Saddam Hussein Responsibility

Saddam Hussein Responsibility
Saddam Hussein is widely regarded as Iraq's most notable president, serving for nearly 24 years as a
military dictator from 1979 to 2003. In his time as President, he founded the Iraqi Ba'ath Party, led a
successful war in the Iran–Iraq war, as well as addressed the major illiteracy, education, and medical
problems in the country. As president he fought to combat illiteracy by providing free education and
mandating attendance for his citizens (UNESCO). The Ba'ath party, a political party that combines
Arab nationalism with socialism, strived to increase middle class' wealth, as well as create a country
of prosperity and innovation. Saddam Hussein had great economic intentions for the country, but is
nonetheless responsible for the deaths of ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The court also considered trying Saddam for the genocide that took place against the Kurds and
other minority groups, but it becomes increasingly difficult to prove responsibility for genocide.
Without a paper trail, it becomes difficult to prove "he said/she said" circumstances. On the other
hand, the prosecutors brought up "the principle of command responsibility – that a leader knew, or
should have known, about murders taking place by forces under his command but took no action
either to prevent them or punish those involved" (Simon 2006). Under Saddam's rule, over 300,000
people died almost entirely because of their ethnicity or religion (Simon 2006). Saddam's trial took
place in Iraq under the Iraqi Higher Criminal Court, a court setup by the United States and the UK
during their occupation, in which specializes in international law. Saddam was tried under this court
instead of the International Criminal Court, because his crimes against humanity took place before
2002: the year the ICC was established. All crimes taking place before the ICC's establishment are
unable to be tried by the ICC (Simon
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Saddam Hussein A Brutal Dictator
Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator but he brought benefits for the Iraqi people Saddam Hussein
came into power formally in 1957 replacing President Ahmed Hassan Al–Bakr. He ruled Iraq from
1957–1991 formally and in hiding from 1991–2003. When Saddam took office Iraq was a
recovering country from years of instability and in fighting. His positive benefits in service to the
people of Iraq are his nationalising the Iraqi oil industry, Literacy program, Healthcare system and
welfare program. The company controlling the Iraqi oil industry was Turkish Petroleum Company
which Saddam had changed to Iraqi Petroleum Company. The literacy program was extensive and
free with vans going into remote villages to provide education. The healthcare system

Saddam Hussein's Downfall
Another country like Saudi Arabia with vast amounts of oil is Iraq. However Iraq is not just about
the oil. It is also about water ways and geopolitics. The Tigris and Euphrates rivers flows through
Iraq. Giving Iraq the majority of control of the water resource. Iraq's location is also desirable to the
United States. It borders Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, and Turkey. It also has a coast line of the
Persian gulf. Their location is also missile sticking distance to Israel and the USSR. Controlling Iraq
gives the United States the ability in "controlling" the Middle East. However the United States was
not able to coerced Iraq into being a pawn. Saddam Hussein refused the proposals of the economic
hit–man. For Saddam Hussein, this was the begin of his demise. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
An economic hit man before the invasion was sent to Panama to coerced Omar Torrijos into having
the same faith as Ecuador and Indonesia, because they wanted control of the Panama Canal,
however Torrijos knew the United States hidden agenda. Like Saddam Hussein, he declined the
offer. After the economic hit man failed, the jackals were sent in. They killed Omar Torrijos, who
did not comply, but making it look like a plane accident. His successor eventually continued his
works of establishing independence of Panama as a dictator. A dictator who was a double agent,
eventually weaning away from the United States, accepting weapons from the communist. When the
jackals failed to acquire the Panama Canal because the successor did not comply, the United States
found reason to send in

Saddam Hussein Ideology
Saddam Hussein has been regarded for centuries as a lethal dictator that led Iraq into the despair and
poverty we see today. However, despite his dictatorial methods of leading his country, Hussein
accomplished some astonishing heights for his beloved country; heights that were destroyed by the
American invasion in 2001. Now, it seems that the question on everyone's lips is; "Was Iraq better
off before or after the American invasion?" and it seems that many Iraqi citizens are more inclined
to believe that their country was far more proficient under the rule of Saddam Hussein. Moreover,
many believe that the political and economic situation in Iraq today is far more chaotic and unequal
under the rule of American forces. Yet, despite Saddam Hussein's ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Well before the war, in the 1970s and 1980s, Iraq was a wealthy nation despite their 8 year long war
with Iran; however, a steady decline was recorded as this war began. But America reinforced the
country with very public financial and political support. This aid eventually led to the invasion of
Iraq by American forces shortly after the 9/11 tragedy in an attempt to rid the country of their
tyrannical leader, Saddam Hussein and restore the country to its former glory. This, however, was
never accomplished. An Iraqi citizen, Wael Al–Sallami, who lived through both the Hussein tyranny
and the American invasion voiced his opinion of the American forces on his blog, he believed

The Gulf War and Saddam Hussein Essay
Today we are living in a world where development has taken such leaps that we cannot imagine how
life looked like in the simpler times. Humans have made immense progress in diverse fields.
Whether we discuss science, technology, arts, business, or trade, evidence of progression is
available in all fields. Nevertheless, we would never understand what happened in the past without
one integral area, History. Inventions and discoveries have made our lives simpler, but at the end of
the day who are these inventions made for? As a content area, History is an immense and
wholesome subject. It encompasses several other areas such as culture, people, ancient
developments, anthropology, art, and of course battles and wars. Human history has seen ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
An interesting fact is that during the Iran–Iraq war of 1980, Kuwait was an ally of Iraq. The man
behind this attack was Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein. He considered the United Arab Emirates and
Kuwait in an economic battle against Iraq. Oil production, oil prices, the Iraqi debt owed to Kuwait,
and the aims of Iraq to increase its control in Kuwait served as a trigger for this attack. Prior to the
war negotiation did take place between Iraq and Kuwait although they could not reach an agreeable
conclusion. Afterwards, Saddam Hussein and American ambassador Catherine Glaspie met and
attempted to discuss further intents at reconciliation. This was also a hopeless case as Kuwait
occupied the important areas of this nation, including the Emir's palace. After this attack, the Gulf
war officially began and lasted for another six months until February 1991. A few days later,
Saddam Hussein announced triumph over Kuwait. As a response to this attack, the United Nations
Security Council passed Resolution 661 on Iraq on August 6th. Resolution 661 implies the global
trade restriction, which was imposed upon Iraq. Prior to the trade prohibition, the United Nations
Security Council asked Iraq to withdraw its troops from Kuwait. The attack on Kuwait by Iran is
called the Gulf war as it took place between these two Gulf nations, but this attack was an extremely

Grendel And Saddam Hussein
At the end of Saddam Hussein rein over Iraq he had killed thousands of innocent civilians of his
own country. Hussein was the leader of Iraq for 24 years he had killed over 5,000 innocent people.
Hussein believed that God put him on this earth to become the president of Iraq and to help educate
the children of his country. Saddam Hussein and Grendel from the book of Beowulf are similar
because they both had the ability to kill a large number of people at one time, they also believed that
their killings were for a good reason, and after their killings they would go to a hideout or their
homes, and both of the monsters were very quick with their thoughts of killing. Grendel and
Saddam Hussein are similar in a way that they both had the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
So, whenever Grendel would kill people he would be able to just say that it was his job to commit
that crime and nothing is wrong with that but people didn't care because he was given this job by the
devil. In an interview with Saddam Hussein he states that "The chemical attacks on the kurdish town
was not worth any serious criminal charges" (Military). The reason he said this was because the
town was suspected of slandering his presidency and not following his laws. Unlike Grendel people
actually believed the attack was actually justified since in the country of Iraq slandering your
president is against the law and is punishable by death. Later on it was found out that there was no
evidence of any crime being committed and Hussein was later charged for the attack. A difference
between the two monsters would be that Saddam Hussein was able to make other people believe
that the attack was justified until no evidence was found. And when Grendel would try to make an
excuse for his attacks nobody would really care and would see right through the excuse and say that
it was just cold blooded murder. Another way that Grendel and Hussein are similar is that after all
their attacks they would go back to their homes or hideouts and wait till their next attack. In
Beowulf it states "The blood dripping behind him,back to his lair" (Beowulf 139–140). This

Saddam Hussein 's Full Takeover Of Iraq
This would set the stage for Saddam Hussein's full takeover of Iraq, making way for further
deterioration of Iraq–Iran relations. Iraq would arrest several Iranian representatives and place
Ayatollah Mohammed Bakr al–Sadr on trial for treason as a response to Ayatollah Khomeini and
Prime Minister Barzagan's continued support of the Shi'a opposition to Saddam Hussein's Ba'athist
regime. Furthered broadcasting of rebellion to the Shi'a Muslims in Iraq and the assignation of the
Iraqi Prime Minister led to Iraq's execution of Ayatollah Bakr as–Sadr. This would lead to the first
official military action, Iran's attacks within the Kermanshah province in September 1980. With this
attack Iraq's response once again circles back to the Shatt al–Arab waterway, as they order Iran to
respect the pre–1975 treaty, withdraw from the province, end all support for all opposition to the
Ba'athist regime and ender violence at the border. On September 22, 1980, Saddam commenced an
invasion of Iran, utilizing the violation of the 1975 Algiers agreement as an argument for action.
Saddam would begin bombing Iranian air bases in an attempt to destroy their superior air force
while still grounded. While runways and fuel depots were damaged, most aircrafts were left
untouched and they were launched within hours, targeting major Iraqi cities and other important
targets. Iraq would launch their mechanized infantry into Iran border towns, overwhelming them,
and allowing Iraq to occupy land within the

Saddam Hussien In Tales Of Tyrants, By Dedam Bowden
Throughout history, tyranny has been demonstrated on many occasions.When rulers wanted to have
an absolute power over all the aspects of the country they are ruling. One of the most famous tyrants
in the history of the middle east countries, or maybe the history of the world, is Saddam Hussein.
Saddam Hussein ruled Iraq for more than 23 years; he tortured, arrested, and killed countless
number of people during the time of his reign. In the article of Tales of Tyrants, Mark Bowden
claimed that Saddam Hussein was a brutal and cruel leader who used violence and ferocity in order
to manipulate the Iraqis and plant his fear in them. Bowden used word diction, and pathos to prove
that Saddam is a diabolical and ruthless person who is trying to dominate Iraqis and get whatever he
wants mercilessly, justifying his means by believing that he is a direct descendent of the Prophet
Mohammed which gives him the right to do anything. In his article, Bowden first starts talking
about Hussein's personality employing diciton words like anointed, and glorious to reveal how
important, and confident Hussien was. Bowden articulated that Saddam Hussien, the Anointed one,
Glorious leader, Direct Descendant of the Prophet. Bowden was trying to assert that Saddam
Hussein was a powerful, influential and strong leader. In Bowden's usage of Anointed he was
probably trying to allude to Hussein's ordering the genealogists to construct a plausible family tree
linking him to Fatima the daughter of

Saddam Hussein Research Paper
Saddam Hussein did not comply with the UN Resolutions and in December 1998, he expelled the
UN inspectors of weapons from Iraq. His actions and noncompliance with the UN Resolutions
represented a threat to international peace (Shah, 2006). As a result, President Bill Clinton
(president of the United Sates at the time) fired 450 missiles into Iraq. He also called for Saddam
Hussein "removal from office" (Shah, 2006) and the U.S. congress approved the Iraqi Liberation
Act (ILA) which authorized U.S. "military help to Iraqis trying to dethrone Saddam" (Shah, 2006).
The U.S. bombarding to Iraq and pressures to Hussein did not intimidate him. Saddam Hussein
continued to reject to allow UN inspectors of weapons of mass destructions to return to Iraq. ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
According to Biggar (2011), the removal of Saddam Hussein from power caused a regimen changed
in Iraq, which was in the best interest of the Iraqi people. Without doubt, Saddam Hussein was a
dictator that did not allow free elections and repressed any form of opposition to his rule. Saddam
killed approximately 482,000 Kurds and Shiite rebels in 1988 and 1991. As a consequence of
Hussein brutality, many people justified the invasion of Iraq. Biggar claimed that the military
intervention of the United States "enabled the removal of a brutal tyrant from power – who was
finally brought to justice – and the establishment of democracy in Iraq"
(2011). For people that support the war the elimination of Saddam Hussein brought hope of freedom
and democracy to Iraq and it started with the trial of Hussein on charges of crimes against humanity.
Also, the invasion brought to Iraq for the first time in history a liberal constitution that will
optimistically guarantee human rights and the rule of law. De Castro Santos and Tavares claimed
that the changed of the regime of Hussein was essential "for peace in the Middle East...and it was
necessary in order to challenge an Arab culture warped by irresponsibility, authoritarian brutality,
rage and

Saddam Hussein Justified
One of the greatest debates over the past decade has been whether the US's effort to overthrow a
tyrannical leader named Saddam Hussein was truly justified. The aim of this paper is to shed light
on what the relations were between the United States and Iraq for over half a century and what
factors led to such a disastrous invasion which left over half a million people dead and countless
more injured. What justifications did politicians such as Vice President Dick Cheney and President
George W. Bush give to the American public which convinced the masses that an invasion was
necessary after disastrous examples in the past such as the invasion of Vietnam? It is important that
one looks over specific turning points in history, such as the attack ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As President George W. Bush made clear in his State of the Union on January 29, 2002, that in
meeting this challenge, the US would not differentiate between terrorist groups and nations "which
harbor or arm them" ("World Socialist"). Iraq did not specifically harbor al–Qaeda, but it had
provided training camps and other support to terrorist groups fighting the government of Turkey and
Iran, as well as hard–line Palestinian groups. In fact, "the question of Iraq's link to terrorism grew
more urgent with Saddam's suspected determination to develop weapons of mass destruction
(WMD), which Bush administration officials feared he might share with terrorists who could launch
devastating attacks against the United States"(Al–Oraibi). Furthermore, the vice president at the
time, Dick Cheney also played a significant role in convincing the masses that an occupation was
necessary. The venues for Cheney's speeches were the national convention of the Veterans of
Foreign Wars in Nashville, Tennessee and in San–Antonio, Texas. Aside from assuring a receptive
audience, the choice of veterans' groups reflects the administration's strategy of first

Why Saddam Hussein Won The Invasion Of Iraq
President George W. Bush authorized the invasion of Iraq in 2003 citing that Saddam Hussein had
been stockpiling weapons of mass destruction. In March of 2003 US led coalition forces entered the
country and overthrew the Hussein regime. The conflict was very short causing some of the infantry
units to not be used in combat. After the conflict ended many of these units were withdrawn from
the country from lack of use. In the short term after the regime was toppled, there was still
resistance from irregular units loyal to Saddam. A consequence of the early withdrawal of troops
was the prolonged the need for American forces to remain in the country to end the resistance. The
last of these combat troops were withdrawn in 2011 after eight

Critically Evaluate How the Situational Model of...
Introduction
Saddam Hussein was the President of Iraq from 1979 to 2003 and during his time in office was
responsible for a tumultuous period in Iraqi history. For the purposes of analysis of his leadership
style with respect to a Situational model, three areas of his career will be looked at separately; his
rise to presidency from Vice–President, during the Iran–Iraq War and post invasion of Kuwait.
Situational model of leadership
A widely recognised situational model is the model developed by Hersey and Blanchard (1969) and
the revised model by Blanchard et al. (1985) (Northhouse, 2007). The theory in outline states that
one's leadership style should be dictated by the type of situation and the demands of the situation at
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This leadership style needs to be used sparingly since workers can often "burn out" due to the
demanding pace of the style.
Democratic Leaders: The Democratic Leadership Style gives members of the work group a vote or a
say in nearly every decision the team makes. When used effectively, the democratic leader builds
flexibility and responsibility and can help identify new ways to do things with fresh ideas. Care
should be taken due to the level of personal involvement required by this style and the decision
making process itself can be very time consuming.
Affiliative Leaders: The Affiliative Leadership Style is most effective in situations where morale is
low or teambuilding is needed. This leader is easily recognized by their theme of "employee first."
Employees can expect much praise from this style; unfortunately, poor performance may also go
without reprimand.
 
Authoritative Leaders: If your business seems to be drifting aimlessly, the Authoritative Leadership
Style can be very effective in this type of situation. The authoritative leader is an expert in dealing
with the problems and challenges at hand and can clearly identify goals that will lead to success.
This leader also allows the employees themselves to figure out the best way to achieve those goals.
Coercive Leaders: The Coercive Leadership Style should be used with caution because it is based on
the concept of "command and

The Corruption Of Saddam Hussein
Throughout history corruption has been laid upon many countries changing it in numerous ways.
This corruption derives through certain people, creating a havoc for those having to follow orders
set by leaders they blindly follow. In Iraq, citizens have been tortured, forced to relocate their
families, arrested and murdered. All of this happened under the control of Saddam Hussein and we
have neither found, nor did he offer an explanation to these actions. He has been notorious for
attacking people who disagreed with his opinions, especially other politicians that would give any
sort of competition to access leadership for Iraq. He is responsible for persecuting and denying his
own citizens human rights. Not only physically but financially, spending all of the countries money
on monuments and palaces as he watches his people die from malnutrition and lack of medical
attention.
Saddam Hussein was born on April 28, 1937 in a village called Ouja, near Tikrit in Northern Iraq,
He grew up in a broken home, His family was poor, they were peasants who did not have a home.
He grew up without a father, it is unknown if his father died or disappeared when he was younger.
When he was still a child, he was sent to live with his uncle, Khairallah Tulfah, who made a deep
impact on what Hussein later did in his life. There is proof that Saddam was connected to violence
at an early age. There are several reports that link him to the murders of a school teacher and/or a

Saddam Hussien And The Iraq-Iraq War
Thank you for your comment! Now for the response... (My apologies for this will be extensive).
Know extensively the history of the Middle East, from the back of my hand without resource.
One thing that can agree on was that the system in Baathist Iraq was excellent. There was no
corruption being committed by others, due to fear and strictness of Saddam Hussein. The
educational system was excellent, as after completing primary and secondary school, you could
head to a well–managed university. Prices were low in a convenient setting, reflecting a strong
economy. In fact, the averaged price for a automobile was equivalent to 1,200 IQD. A grain rice
could be bought for less than 4 IQD. The rate of owning a home didn't carry a burden. Overall, the
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Which showed the cruelty of nationalism. Which is illogical, because he disliked the Shia Arabs,
who were the same ethnic group, but different sect of religion. Which reflected that no one deserves
his respect, with exception of Sunni Arabs.
"Being free of the shackles of nationalism (to say nothing of its ugly sister, patriotism."
Eventually, the Kurds would be saved by the United States of America and the West, as they would
provide the no–fly zone in the 36 degree parallel in the North, ultimately establishing a autonomous
region for the Kurds to operate their own quasi–nation in that enclave. The other no–fly zone in the
32nd and deep 33rd degree axis in the South, that would protect the Shia–majority Arabs in this
regions. The purpose of the no–fly zone was to slow down and ultimately stop Saddam Hussein's
militaristic actions towards the groups.
The irony is that Saddam Hussien would fuel the fire to the long and already sectarian violence of
the nation, and officially split of the groups rather uniting the people

Saddam Hussein's Operation Desert Storm
Saddam Hussein takes over Kuwait, and on January 17, 1991 President George Bush signs
Operation Desert Storm. War is upon the Middle East.
Saddam Hussein was born April twenty–eighth, 1937 in a town called Tikrit in Iraq.(Summers) His
father was a shepherd for a local farmer. He left him, his mom, and his brother a few months before
his birth. A while after his birth, his brother died of cancer. Afterward his mom could not take care
of him and she sent him to his uncle in Baghdad. Many years later he returned home and suffered
abuse from his stepfather. He left for Baghdad to return to his uncle. His uncle's Arab nationalism
rubbed off and inspired little Saddam. At twenty Saddam joined Ba'ath party who had goals to unite
Arab states. He got shot in the leg during an assassination attempt on the Iraqi President. He then
fled to Egypt to attend law school. When Ahmed Hassan al–Bakr came to power and Saddam ...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
June twenty–fifth of 1961 Iraq publicly states it owns Kuwait. Twelve years later on March
twentieth, Iraqi soldiers under the command of their president, Ahmed Hassan al–Bakr, Iraq took
over two border posts along the Kuwait border. In 1980, Iraq declares war with Iran. On August
2,1990, the raid on Kuwait begins. Meanwhile, in in the U.S., George Bush is worried after the
message from Saddam Hussein saying that if the U.S. intervenes that they should be ready for some
form of terrorism back home. Then on August fifth, 1990 President Bush calls Iraqis outlaws and
international renegades and expresses his concern by saying,"I view very seriously our
determination to reverse this aggression...This will not stand." Back in the Middle East, Operation
Desert Shield pilots are beginning to be given spots to watch along the Saudi Arabian border. Also
on August seventh, the U.S. ground troops are being deployed along the border. (Persian) The
reason for this action was caused by Saddam's threat to take Saudi Arabia.

The Fall Of Saddam Hussein's Baath Party
also made sure that the Ba'athists maintain control of the civilian population as well. During his
presidency, he made Ba'ath Party membership a requirement for holding almost any government job
and to be a party member in good standing. This incident put fear in Iraqi people from the
beginning. According to an article by BBC News " The Iraqi Baath party," written by Kafala "As
part of Saddam Hussein's power structure and complicit in his brutal rule, the Ba'ath party was
expected to disintegrate with the end of his rule." Saddam had many informants such an extensive
network that two people could not talk together without being reported and to talk with someone
about the president and his policies, he could land them to jail. Saddam made Iraqis

Saddam Hussein's Response To The Iraq War
The involvement of America in Iraq and Afghanistan was ill–timed, and it was not the best way to
respond to the 9/11 attack by Osama Bin Laden. The rationale of the Bush administration to invade
Iraq was that Saddam Hussein had supported Osama Bin Laden's attacks. However, this claim made
no sense going by the fact that Osama had nothing but disdain for the peculiar regime of one
Saddam Hussein. Additionally, the complaint by the Bush administration that Saddam Hussein was
hiding dangerous weapons of mass destruction turned to be false since the administration had no
evidence to prove it. It later came to be known that President Bush had given an order to officials of
the United Nations investigating the regime of Saddam Hussein for weapons

The Pros And Cons Of Saddam Hussein
At the same time, Saddam Hussein was seen as a threat thanks to the public relations campaign the
Bush administration had been doing. In addition, the White House was finishing up a speech that
was for the president to announce on October 7, 2002, so that the use of force on Iraq could be
authorized. In the end the CIA declined the speech because of a sentence in the speech: "The [Iraqi]
regime has been caught attempting to purchase up to 500 metric tons of uranium oxide from Africa–
an essential ingredient in the enrichment process." The line was later removed after the CIA insisted
on the change. Although the lined was thought to be removed from the speech, there was a loss of
communication with the two agents responsible for translating the Niger intelligence resulting in the
line not getting taken out.
When ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Those who supported the war against Iraq believed that it was necessary for the United States to
allay the hostilities coming from Iraq. They also believed that Saddam Hussein needed to be brought
to justice because of how careless he was for human life. In addition, they argued that the region has
a plentiful amount of oil resources that could be beneficial to the world's economy. Also, by getting
rid of Saddam, the rest of the world is overall more safe from the works of terrorists because if Iraq
had weapons of mass destruction, he could provide terrorist groups with those weapons thus making
them stronger making the U.S. more prone to terrorist attacks.
Those against the war with Iraq, countered those arguments saying that a war would kill many
civilians and troops of the libertarian army. In addition, according to U.S. policy and precedents
already set, an attack without any solid information lacks moral authority. The also believed that the
inspectors of the U.N. could possibly correct the problem and that the U.S. would have to rebuild a
new

Saddam Hussein's Invasion Of Iraq
When Saddam Hussein refused to leave Iraq, the United States and allied forces launched an attack
on the morning of March 20, 2003. The invasion itself only lasted 21 days, concluding with the
capture of the Iraqi capital of Bagdad by American forces. Massive air strikes across the country and
against Iraqi command and control threw the defending army into chaos, preventing the Iraqi
military from making an effective resistance. The main body of the coalition forces pushed hard and
fast across Iraq meeting little to no resistance. Iraqi president at the time, Saddam Hussein and his
central leadership went into hiding as the coalition military forces completed the occupancy of the
country. On May 1, 2003, an end to all major combat operations ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Iraqi government blind to the threat it faced, hampered by Saddam's poor military leadership
and deceived by its own propaganda. The inability to believe an invasion was imminent, taunting
the UN with not allowing them to search for the supposed weapons of mass destruction. One man
caused the most ultimate down fall of his country. The United States and Coalition forces devastated
the government and captured the main cites of a large diverse nation in just 21 days. The invasion
did require a large military buildup

Saddam Hussein became the head of the Iraq government in 1979. Around the same time, radical
Islamic ideas coming from the Islamic Revolution were spreading in the region, especially Iraq,
Saddam feared those hostiles movements and in 1980, invaded Iraq. The country had the support of
many nations, including the United States, for doing so. The war ended eight years later, and Iraq
didn't achieve what it had desired. The war caused thousands of deaths, left Iraq with a debt of
billions of dollars and slowed its development on oil export. Kuwait was one of the states that
supported Iraq in the Iran–Iraq War, the country was also scared of the Islamic and Revolution and
wanted to prevent Iranian hegemony in Kuwait. Even though, since Kuwait's ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
In 1913 a convention was signed defining the territories in the Gulf area. A year later Turkey
declared war against Britain, the conflict created border issues. However, after the war Turkey
renounced its claims on Kuwait, and in 1923 the new border was designed by Britain establishing
the boundary between Kuwait and Iraq. These borders gave Kuwait the Warba and Bubiyan islands
which Iraq claimed to be a part of its territory. A more serious crisis came in 1961 when "Kuwait
obtained independence, and the Iraqi ruler, General Abdul–Karim Qassim mobilized troops and
formally announced Iraq's claim for Kuwait." Following the General's actions countries like Britain,
Egypt and Saudi Arabia stood to help Kuwait, such action stopped the crisis, but it did not solve the
disagreements of the border. The economic tensions with Kuwait following the Iraq–Iran War might
have provoked Saddam to recall old territory issues, and made Iraqi–Kuwait relations even more

Saddam Hussein's Three Reasons For The Invasion Of Iraq
resident Bush announced in 2003 the intentions to invade Iraq, and dismantle Saddam Hussein's
regime "to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger." and from a
state department's reason to go to war against Iraq "Defeated a regime that developed and used
weapons of mass destruction, that harbored and supported terrorists, committed outrageous human
rights abuses, and defied the just demands of the United Nations and the world." These reasons led
to thousands of dead on both sides, 612 Billion dollars, and another terror organization taken root.
Originally in the 1980s, the U.S supported Saddam Hussein's war against Iran and aided them with
weapons, and money. During this period was when Saddam's major human ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The U.S lost nearly 4,500 soldiers, and had 45,000 injured. Refugees fleeing the worn torn country
rose to 2.5 million, and caused a refugee crisis for Syria whom took on the most refugees. After the
initial invasion, the country saw a rise in terrorist attacks, and the international community saw
terrorists attacks attributed to the invasion like the July 2005 terrorist bombings of London. The war
also cost more than 600 billion dollars, that's not including interest on debts, and veteran benefits.
The cost will also rise due to the fighting that is currently happening with the terrorist group ISIS.
ISIS was formed from different groups of terrorists like Al–Qaeda. The withdraw of U.S forces (in a
still unstable region) left a Vacuum that was filled by ISIS. The group has caused problems for
Syria, Iraq, France, Tunisia, and many more countries. ISIS's strongholds, Iraq and Syria, are seeing
a genocide of Shiites in the region, and countless executions of civilians, and prisoners of war. ISIS
also had a hand in destabilizing Syria further after the breakout of Civil War in the country. The
fight against ISIS is currently making ground, but it will be years before their ideology is rooted

Pros And Cons Of Saddam
The Mearsheimer and Walt article criticizes this administration's focus on Saddam as a major threat
to the United Stated. I find their arguments flawed in and they depict an incomplete picture of the
Iraq and Saddam. I believe that Saddam remains a major threat to the United States, and I advocate
that you continue to your plan of action against Saddam.
In the article, they present counterarguments against our conclusions that Saddam is undeterrable,
that he is interested in assisting terrorists targeting the United States, and that he intends to use
weapons of mass destruction (WMD) against us. Their claims rely on the belief that Saddam is not a
serial aggressor nor an irrational actor. Despite starting wars with his neighbors, Iran and ... Show
Mearsheimer and Walt are that because there is a lack of evidence of what they consider to be a
"genuine connection" between Saddam and al–Qaeda. This lack of a genuine connection is not a
concern in addressing the issue of Saddam for several reasons. Regardless of whether there is a
connection to Saddam ad al–Qaeda, in the wake of 9you're your administration has declared a global
war on terror, including all terrorist groups and governments that support them, and Saddam falls
within scope of this declaration. Saddam, throughout his rule, has publicly demonstrated support for,
and even had a hand in, terrorist activities. George H. W. Bush was nearly a victim of such an act
when in 1993, Iraqi intelligence attempted to assassinate him using a car bomb. Within Iraq, the
terrorist situation is even more troubling. In 20002, the CIA reported that "Iraq continues to be a
safe haven, transit point, or operational node for groups and individuals who direct violence against
the United States, Israel, and other allies." Aside from direct actions, Saddam has also shown
support for terrorism indirectly. Saddam has provided the families of Palestinian suicide bomber
with cash rewards, and he openly celebrated the attacks on 9/11. Saddam is not an innocent
bystander in global terrorism. He plays a role in global terrorism in the same ways that Osama Bin
Laden has, and if

The Consequences Of Saddam Hussein's Invasion Of Iraq
In 2003 the United States, under the Bush administration made the decision to invade Iraq with
90,000 troops. President Bush justified the decision by stating that Saddam Hussein was a grave
threat to the United States and the rest of the West, furthermore he justified the US's decision to
invade by stating that "the dictator of Iraq and his weapons of mass destruction are a threat to the
security of free nations, he is a danger to his neighbours. He's a sponsor of terrorism. He's an
obstacle to progress in the west Asia. For decades he has been the cruel, cruel suppressor of the Iraqi
people" (Lin) Despite the immense destruction of infrastructure, the deaths of hundreds of
thousands of 'innocent' Iraqi's, another disastrous and detrimental

Operation Iraqi Freedom: The Rapid Collapse Of Saddam Hussein
The rapid collapse of the regime of Saddam Hussein marked a defining moment for advocates of
regime change. Operation Iraqi Freedom and its aftermath produced a number of challenging
problems for Iraqis, their neighbours, the international community and, not least, the supporters of
the invasion. For the last, these problems included the unexpected difficulty of the first phase of the
campaign; the failure to find weapons of mass destruction; the lack of effective planning for the
aftermath; and the continuing violent opposition to the new regime. This chapter examines key
features of neo–conservative thinking in retrospect and prospect after the collapse of Saddam
Hussein's regime. Neo–conservatives had long argued for, and presumably prepared

In 2003, George W. Bush invaded Iraq, believing that the...
In 2003, George W. Bush invaded Iraq, believing that the country's president Saddam Hussein was
using weapons of mass destruction against the people of Iraq. This war started a larger war, named
"Operation Iraqi Freedom". The consequence of this inessential war were the lives of over 4000
Americans, over 1 trillion dollars in spending, and superfluous tension in the Middle East. Though
there are many theories on why Bush invaded Iraq, the one that makes the most sense is
overconfidence. Simply put, George W. Bush and his administration had faulty and ambiguous
evidence, but their overconfidence and pride lead them to put the war into action anyway. This self–
assuredness lead to the expiration of Bush's tenure and the broken hearts of many ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Mr. Bea talks about British Petroleum, which is most known for its oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
"Bea pointed to the congressional testimony, that BP ignored problems with a dead battery, leak
cement job and loose hydraulic fittings" (Borenstein). Here, BP's excessive pride lead to improper
thinking, BP specifically thought that it could continue to ship and drill oil with a variety of known
problems. In the end, BP faced a lot of criticism and worst of all, the Gulf of Mexico is now
perilously polluted with oil. Many people like to believe that pride is something noble, something to
treasure, but that is a false truism. Pride will actually bring a person to make false judgments and
thinking, which will lead to the falling apart of the general public.
Apart from causing fabricated beliefs, hubris will cause individuals to be so confident that they set
completely impractical goals. One example is best expressed by Mr. Lee Clarke, who is an author
and professor at Rutgers University. Clarke made up an example of unrealistic goals involving
British Petroleum's drilling, saying "we have been doing this every day, every year, week in, week
out, so next week we go to 5000 feet, it will be like last week when we went to 300 feet"
(Borenstein). BP's overconfidence has undoubtedly caused them to set ridiculous expectations. In
this scenario, BP is trying

Summary: The Influence Of Saddam Hussein
The primary influences accountable for the actions executed by Saddam Hussein throughout his
term consist of the harsh and abusive nature of his childhood which, when explored in detail,
evidently show that had there been the absence of his stepfather, Saddam's antagonistic outlook
would not exist. Kairallah Tulfah, Saddam's maternal uncle had a severe political impact on Hussein
due to his support of Arab–Nationalism, Ba'athism and Nazi–Germany. Kairallah Tulfah's influence
is also integrated throughout the idea regarding Saddam Hussein's uprising as a political figure as
being a significant influence due to the resilience, determination and support that was developed
throughout this time. Finally, the weaponry–aid that was provided by the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Uncle Talfah's influence on Saddam to see a unified Arab world as beneficial was a foremost
contributing factor to Saddam's loyalty to the Ba'ath party. Uncle Talfah's ideals and influences on
Saddam are evident through his dominating Ba'athist outlook, which were primarily psychologically
implemented by Talfah. Saddam's dedication and impulse to gain full control over Iraq was severe,
alike his uncle's desire to lead and urge the idea of Ba'athism, making the Arab world one powerful
force. Talfah's morals and outlook on the world, being pro Nazi Germany and an Arab Nationalist is
reflected throughout Saddam's engagements and methods used throughout his term. The modes of
operation used by Nazi Germany were those of torture and annihilation. Arab Nationalism was an
influence, evident through Saddam's loyalty to the Ba'ath party, promotion of the Arab World, and if
opposed, was penalized. "The great and immortal squares of Iraq shall be filled up with the corpses
of traitors and spies" (Arnold, Saddam Hussein's Iraq, 2015, p.43)
Kairallah Talfah's impact on Saddam Hussein has severely implemented a negative and destructive
ideology of Arab Nationalism and Ba'athism, promoting supremacy of Arab nations. The influence
and passion for Nazi Germany, introduced by Kairallah Talfah, undoubtedly led to the heinous
nature of Saddam Hussein's crimes, inevitably leading to Hussein's trial and

Saddam Hussein's Invasion Of Iraq In 2003
The invasion of Iraq in 2003 was justified. Saddam Hussein, leader of Iraq at the time was the
central threat to peace in the Middle East. The United States under the Bush presidency aimed to
remove this threat and bring an infectious democracy to the region that would cause a retreat in
terrorism. The Iran–Iraq war claimed the lives of about one million people. Both sides of the war
used weapons of mass destruction, primarily poisonous gases. Instead of rebuilding the country after
war, Saddam tried in 1990 to acquire 19% of the world's oil supply by invading Kuwait. This was
stopped by coalition forces of nations including the US and Britain among others in operation desert
storm perpetuating anti American sentiment. During the Gulf War Saddam commissioned several
failed terrorist attacks against the US and other nations. For example in 1993 the Iraqi Intelligence
Service directed and pursued an attempt to assassinate, through the use of a powerful car bomb,
former president George Bush and the Emir or Kuwait. There was NO reason to doubt that Saddam
had weapons of mass destruction in 2003, he had used them in the Iran Iraq war. At the time close to
no one doubted that Saddam had WMD NOT the Germans, NOT the British ... Show more content
Had Saddam accepted UN resolutions, proven he destroyed his stockpiles of WMD and had no
nuclear weapons development programs there would have been no US invasion. Saddam's
resistance to the UN resolutions proved that nonviolent methods of dispute resolution would not
work in Iraq, and the US invaded as a last resort. Contrary to popular belief there was evidence of
WMD found during the invasion of Iraq and the intelligence was not garbage. Two trailers serving
as mobile lab units containing the equipment necessary to generate biological weapons were found,
as intelligence had

Saddam Interpretation Essay
Mearsheimer and Walt present a number of contrasting arguments that argue that Saddam's
behaviour is actually not Irrational. They state, "the historical record shows that the United States
can contain Iraq effectively–even if Saddam has nuclear weapons–just as it contained the Soviet
Union during the Cold War". The authors delve into Saddam's dealings and actions in the Iran–Iraq
War (1980–88) as well as the Gulf War (1990–91), as well as his administering of chemical
weapons.The authors proclaim that the UN's Saddam Interpretation as "irrational", did not make any
sense. With respect to the Iran–Iraq War and the Gulf War Saddam was labelled "unintentionally
suicidal". The authors rebut with the fact that Iraq had the capability to use WMD's

Saddam Hussein: Tikrit, Iraq
Saddam Hussein Saddam was born in April 28, 1937 in Tikrit, Iraq. He was born into a poor family.
His father disappeared before he was born and his older brother died of cancer shortly after. His
mother was so depressed because of his older brother's death and his father leaving that she was
unable to take care of him. He moved to live with his uncle in Baghdad when he was three. He later
moved in with a devout Sunni Muslim named Talfah. Talfah's politics had a huge influence on
Saddam growing up. Saddam later joined the Ba'ath Party. The Ba'ath Party's main ideology was to
unite Arab states in the Middle East. Members of the Ba'ath party, including Saddam, attempted to
assassinate Iraq's then–president, Abd al–Karim Qasim on October 7, 1959 because he didn't want
to Unite all Arab states. The assassination was a failure, and several of the members were caught,
tried, and executed. All the other members, including Saddam, fled to Syria. Saddam later then went
to Egypt, where he attended law school. When Saddam returned to Iraq in 1963, he was arrested for
in–fighting in the Ba'ath Party. He remained in politics while in Prison, and then years later, he was
able to escape. Still remaining in the Ba'ath party, he proved to be a ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This conflict turned into a war. Western Nations put their support in Saddam even though his
invasion clearly violated international law because they were scared of the spread of Islamic
radicalism. After years of war that left thousands dead on both sides, an agreement was finally
reached on August 20, 1988. Saddam then tried revitalizing Iraq's economy and infrastructure.
Saddam then ordered an invasion on Kuwait on August 2, 1990. To resolve this, The UN Security
Council set a deadline that Iraqi forces must be out of Kuwait. The deadline was ignored, and forces
drove them out of

Why Saddam Hussein Ruled Iraq
Saddam Hussein ruled Iraq for almost a third of the country's existence as an independent nation.
Since its beginning, Iraq was divided by ethnicity and tribal structures representing alternative
socio–political communities in competition with central state government. In fact, Iraq has always
been a weak state – defined as having just enough power and coercive force for the central
government to remain in control – and its viability over time depended on its ability to govern and
enforce laws. The durability of tribal structures, particularly those in the sparsely populated Sunni
portions of the country, made it difficult for the Iraqi government to absorb and integrate them
(Crone, 1993). These problems were exacerbated by the faction ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This process reflected the historic ebb and flow of tribal power, as well as the political durability of
tribal structures able to broker allegiance for privileged influence. Powerful Sunni tribes and tribal
confederations like the Jubur, Dulaym, Tayy, Khazraj, al–Azza, Harb, Maghamis, Mushahadah,
Luhayb, and Ubayd became accustomed to receiving significant money and autonomy, as well as
privileged positions within government (Otterman, 2003). Giving them these benefits in exchange
for their allegiance benefited Hussein, however it also established these tribes as power brokers
within the context of post–invasion Iraq, something bound to hinder the development of Iraqi
democracy and nationalism. If Sunni tribes, representing a third of the Iraqi population, could
choose which government to support or require exclusive privileges from their continued
acquiescence, the prospect of forming an effective Iraqi democracy seemed to require strengthening
the central government by weakening the tribes. However, the ongoing Iraqi insurgency, largely
fueled by the same Sunni tribes, drove the United States into adopting policies the reinforced tribal
power. The became particularly evident in the 2007–2008 period when the United States

A Comparison Of Macbeth And Saddam Hussein
In this research essay I will be explaining how Macbeth can be compare to one of the world's worst
dictators, Saddam Hussein. I will be talking about how they were both very bad people by trying to
gain control over everyone and everything and ultimately be in power. They can both be compared
to each other in many ways. Macbeth and Hussein both ruled by terror, they used violence to solve
any problems that they had, no matter what it may have been. Macbeth can be related to a lot of
other dictators besides Saddam Hussein, but I believe there are a lot of things that can be compared
and contrasted between Macbeth and Saddam Hussein unlike any other dictator. I'm going to first
talk about Macbeth and his life and how he gained power and what he did with it, then I will talk
about Saddam Hussein and finally I will compare them to each other.
Macbeth was first introduced into the play as a warrior, a soldier, who had won great honour from
the kind due to his actions on the battlefield. Macbeth was then led to wicked thoughts by the
prophecies of the three witches, especially after the prophecy of that Macbeth will be made Thane of
Cawdor. Macbeth then commits his first crime by killing Duncan in order to take the crown and
become king. Macbeth is willing to do anything necessary in order to maintain his position in
power. Macbeth commits his second crime by ordering others to kill Banquo, to do his own dirty
work for him. Macbeth had felt that he was a threat to him. Throughout

Saddam Hussein Influence
A dictator is someone who rules over his country with total power, typically someone who gained
his or her power by force. So on April 28, 1937 one of the harshest dictators ever seen had just been
born, and would be later known as Saddam Hussein. Saddam Hussein would go on to reign over
Iraq for 24 years starting in 1979. During this time he married his cousin Sajida Talfah and had two
sons and three daughters. Eventually though Saddam Hussein would be captured by U.S. Forces and
executed on December 30,2006. Saddam Hussein's manipulation into power allowed him to become
the one of the most relentless dictators in recent history, and showed little regard to life and the
people of Iraq.
Before Saddam's reign over Iraq, the Hashemite monarchy ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
During his reign, Saddam made a free education system for the people of Iraq. Around the 1980's
there was 100% enrollment rates that allowed the middle class to become better educated. He also
gave free health care and lowered prices on medicine. Every kid was to be vaccinated by the
government. Helping out families who couldn't afford to protect their kids from diseases. He tried to
make at least one Hospital in each city with high quality healthcare systems. Iraq almost gained a
developed country status because of how well their healthcare system was. He also paved highways
all across the country and made at least one school and clinic in every city. By making these reforms
he was making Iraq a stronger independent country. Also it show the vision he had for Iraq and how
he was trying to improve

Saddam Hussein
Saddam Hussein
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
(Redirected from Saddam)
Saddam Hussein
Enlarge
Saddam Hussein
Saddām Hussein ʻAbd al–Majid al–Tikrītī (Often spelled Husayn or
Hussain; Arabic صدام حسين
عبدالمجيد
التكريتي; born April 28, 1937 1) was
President of Iraq from 1979 to 2003.
A rising star in the revolutionary Ba'ath Party, which espoused secular pan–Arabism, economic
modernization, and socialism, Saddam (see 2 regarding names) played a key role in the bloodless
1968 coup that brought the party to power. As vice president under the frail and elderly ... Show
The stranglehold of the old elites (the conservative monarchists, established families, and
merchants) was breaking down in Iraq. Moreover, the populist pan–Arab nationalism of Gamal
Abdel Nasser in Egypt would profoundly influence the young Ba'athist, even up to the present day.
The rise of Nasser foreshadowed the wave of revolutions throughout the Middle East in the fifties
and sixties, which would see the collapse of the monarchies of Iraq, Egypt, and Libya. Nasser
challenged the British and French, nationalized the Suez Canal, and strove to modernize Egypt and
unite the Arab world politically.
[edit]
Rise in the Ba'ath party
A year after Saddam had joined the Ba'ath party, army officers led by General Abdul Karim Qassim
overthrew Faisal II of Iraq. The Ba'athists opposed the new government, and in 1959, Saddam was
involved in the attempted assassination of Prime Minister Qassim. Saddam was shot in the leg, but
managed to flee to Syria, from where he later moved to Egypt. He was sentenced to death, in
absentia. In exile he attended the University of Cairo law school.
Army officers, including some aligned with the Ba'ath party, came to power in Iraq in a military

coup in 1963. However, the new government was ousted quickly, within seven to eight months torn
by rife factionalism. Saddam returned to Iraq, but was imprisoned in 1964 when an anti–Ba'ath
group led by Abdul Rahman Arif took power. He escaped from jail in 1967 and became one of the
leading members of the

Cory Tertel Ms. Maass Global Issues May 19, 2017 The Life of Saddam Hussein Background My
name is Saddam Hussein. I was born in Tikrit, Iraq on April 28, 1937. I was named by my mother's
brother as my father died before I was born. I lived with my abusive step–father when I was young.
He forced me to steal farm animals because we were poor. I went to live with my uncle at the age of
10. There I was raised a Sunni Muslim. He allowed me to go to school because he was a teacher. I
joined the Arab Baath Socialist Party while still in high school. Through this party we were
unsuccessful in 1959 at an assassination attempt of Major General Abdel Karim Kassem in order to
overthrow the Iraqi monarchy. ("Saddam Hussein") Social Impact Through ... Show more content
In the beginning of my presidency I was able to make the life of the average citizen easier and
better. However after the Anfal Campaign and the invasion of Kuwait, many foreign powers stopped
trading with us. Trade sanctions led to our economy and government to cripple. ("Saddam Hussein
Profile") Focus of your Own: 3 thick questions (open ended questions: how, why) and the answers
to those questions. Why Did Other Countries Turn To Hate Iraq? Foreign nations looked down upon
our actions to create weapons of mass destruction and to use chemical weapons against our own
people. How Did Saddam Hussein Make Sure That No One Would Oppose Him? In order to secure
my power as president I had to install a method of fear through intimidation and pressure. My goal
was to establish a de facto rule as president. Six days after I was promoted to president, I held a
broadcasted meeting with all of the other Baath party leaders. I accused each of the other party
leaders of being disloyal to my presidency and our party, resulting in all of the leaders but one being
executed. Showing the capability of my power live on television for the whole nation to see allowed
me to expand my power upon the region. I began to install a motive of fear, respect, and reliance on
our government. Why did Saddam Hussein order the Anfal

The Persian Gulf War: A USLed War Against Saddam Hussein's...
A) The Persian Gulf War a U.S. – led war against Saddam Hussein's Iraq. The level of analysis that
best explains that event is the individual level. Saddam Hussein made the decision to attack Kuwait
in August of 1990. I believe that the cause of this war was based on one individual (Saddam
Hussein) because of his previous decision to dissolve conflict and return territory that his troop had
occupied. The Persian Gulf War led to countries chain gang to each other. With Britain, France,
Germany, the Soviet Union, Japan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia versus Iraq, Jordan, Algeria, the Sudan,
Yemen, Tunisia and the PLO. The sequences of events was caused by Saddam Hussein's choice to
occupy Kuwait, because of allegation that there was overproduction of

Saddam Hussein was the former president of Iraq for over twenty years. Born on April 28, 1937, in
Tikrit, Iraq, Saddam Hussein was a secularist who rose through the Baath political party to assume a
dictatorial presidency. Under his rule, segments of the populace enjoyed the benefits of oil wealth,
while those in opposition faced torture and execution. After military conflicts with U.S.–led armed
forces, Hussein was captured in 2003. He was later executed.
Saddam's early lifetime could possibly be the reason he did the things he did. His father disappeared
several months before his birth. A few months later, Saddam's older brother died of cancer. His
mother was then taken over with severe depression, just after Saddam was born, because of the
things that had happened previously. At the age of three, he was sent to live with his uncle,
Khairallah Talfah. Several years later, he would return to Al–Awja to live with his mother. But after
being ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Saddam returned to Iraq, but was arrested about a year after he returned, as a result of his attempt to
kill Qasim. Shortly after he escaped prison, in the following years he rose in power. During this time
he helped to produce the first chemical weapons program. In 1979 he attempted to unite Syria and
Iraq, which would have left Saddam powerless, where he forced Al–Bakr to resign. On July 16th
1979, he became president of Iraq. One week later, he called an assembly of the Ba'ath Party. He
then called out 68 names, they were arrested and removed from the room. 22 of the 68 were killed.
By August 1979 hundreds of Saddam's political foes were martyred. Ayatollah Khomeini led the
Islamic revolution to a success against Iraqi forces. Saddam returned by invading the oil–rich region
of Khuzestan in Iran. Soon the conflict became a war. On August 20, 1988, after years of intense
war, that left hundreds of thousands dead, the war reached an

The Pros And Cons Of Saddam Hussein
The two most effective options are containment and invasion, as they utilize military force to
remove Saddam Hussein from power. Invasion is a viable solution because Hussein is a dangerous
threat and needs to be removed from power immediately. Saddam Hussein has repeatedly proven to
be uncooperative and deceptive in dealing with the United Nations weapons inspections. Also,
defeating the dictatorship in Iraq will send a message to other countries, just by mobilizing their
troops that this behavior will not be tolerated by the United States, and that we are willing to invade,
regardless of support from other powers (Mack). The regime in Iraq is a threat to the Iraqi people,
the citizens of the United States, and all of the surrounding countries. Saddam has been threatened
and warned, but still avoids weapons regulations. A historian explained, '"We're not going to tackle
Saddam Hussein, we're going to leave this (Inaudible) dictator in power.' It's pretty obvious how it
would look. It would look that the West was scared of Saddam Hussein, it would appear that
Saddam Hussein had faced down the great powers of the world," (Alternative to War). The Iraqi
citizens are being oppressed by Hussein, and they will welcome the United States troopers, as they
yearn for a new government. Some Arabs want to United States to be involved even more and oust
all other oppressive Arab leaders (Mack). Other countries will look at Iraq and the ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The United States needs to take serious military action, to send a message

In 1969, my mother's family fled Iraq for the United States in hopes of establishing a stable,
opportunistic lifestyle. However, their refuge to the land of opportunity was not without adversity.
Saddam Hussein's rise to power was arguably the best and worst event that happened to the
Chaldeans. Before Saddam, Iraq was led by nationalists who were not fond of Christians and their
beliefs. However, Saddam's prime minister, Tariq Aziz, was Chaldean and allowed Christians to
practice their religion without feeling oppressed as a minority in a majority Muslim country. Still,
the majority of their liberties were still restricted, and their obedience to Saddam and his Ba'ath
Party regime was mandatory. In 1990, after ordering brutal chemical attacks ... Show more content
Sometimes they are forced to abandoned what they hold most dear. The immigration crisis today has
left millions of people stranded in foreign lands. Many have died or suffered greatly during their
refuge, hoping to find a new life, a new beginning. Saddam and his Ba'ath Party brutally imposed
that reality on many Iraqis. While the Chaldeans may not have had it as hard as other Christians in
the country, the effects of the Gulf War, the Kuwait invasion and the Iraq war in 2003 caused
massive displacement and adversity for our people. Many were exiled from their homelands, others
from themselves, suffering psychological and emotional trauma that lives within them to this day.
However, our culture and our faith have always uplifted us. Our churches serve as the pinnacle of
our community, and it is here that Chaldean immigrants and their children gather to re–establish the
life they once remembered. Their courage and desire to escape from a war–torn country and flee to
America is truly a unique story of escaping savaged lands, finding new homes and building empires
on sheer

Saddam Hussein Responsibility

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Liz Brown

More from Liz Brown (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Saddam Hussein Responsibility