Successfully reported this slideshow.

Assessment and Feedback Cluster A IBLC 2012


Published on

Overview slides for workshop at the Blended Learning conference June 2012 led by cluster A

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Assessment and Feedback Cluster A IBLC 2012

  1. 1. Aligning assessment & feedback with 21st century needs Cluster A project teams from the Assessment and Feedback Programme:• Bath Spa/Winchester Universities• Cornwall College• University of Exeter• University of Hertfordshire& Peter Bullen – Critical Friend IBLC 2012
  2. 2. Strand A: Institutional change• The eight projects in this strand aim to redesign assessment and feedback practices, making best use of technology to deliver significant change at programme, school or institutional level.••
  3. 3. Objectives of this session• To gain an overview of the work of the four projects• To stimulate dialogue about technology supported assessment and feedback• To enable participants to consider how this work can be transferred into their contexts
  4. 4. FASTECHJoelle Adams and Bex LewisUsing readily available technologies to support thesystemic enhancement of assessment and feedbackstrategies and practices at programme, faculty andinstitutional levels.FASTFeedback and Assessment Strategy TestingTony HarrisIntegrating technology within assessment andfeedback activity to enhance employability.
  5. 5. COLLABORATE Rich OsborneBringing together staff, students and employers tocreate employability focused assessments enhancedby technology.ITEAMJulie VuoloProviding an integrated approach to supporting a range ofin- and out- of-class technologies that enhance assessmentand feedback opportunities for all our students.
  6. 6. Session - activities• Introduction (5 min)• Engaging with Posters by adding comments/questions (20 min): Task: Please provide one comment/question on one challenge per poster (5 min/poster). Supplementary task: Add other questions/comments as time permits.
  7. 7. Session – activities (continued)• In depth discussion with one of the teams, around their poster (15 min)• Plenary – summary - one key point/group raised in the in-depth discussion (5 min)
  8. 8. For more information about theseprojects see: