1. Best Practices with Media and Technology Marlo Gaddis and Jackie Pierson

3. IMPACT students caught up within one year Effect significant at p<. 0001, controlling for grade, race, exceptionality, Free/reduced lunch, sex, absenteeism

4. EOG growth from baseline to Year 2 Effect significant at p<. 05, controlling for free/reduced lunch, race, exceptionality, sex, absenteeism, parent education

5. Student Use of Computers in Grades 3-5 2004-05

6. Note : Effects significant at p < .0001. Response options were 1 (not at all), 2 (minimally), 3 (confidently) and 4 (able to teach others). Analyses controlled for sex and age.

9. Note : * significant at p < .05 Category Comparison IMPACT Administrators 58.8% 76.5% Classroom teachers 69.3% 77.0%* Special subjects teachers 76.8% 62.5%

10. Note : Years in the profession was significant (Odds Ratio = 1.18, p < .03), and IMPACT was a near-significant trend (Odds Ratio = 1.52, p < .07).

12. 79.9 95.7 IMPACT Model Implementation Six year average before IMPACT 1997-2002 Four year average after IMPACT 2003-2006