Advancements in Compact Heat Exchangers: A Comprehensive Review

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 10 Issue: 10 | Oct 2023 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2023, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 8.226 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 318
Advancements in Compact Heat Exchangers: A Comprehensive Review
Mithlesh Thakur1, Dr. Ajay Singh2, Dr. Parag Mishra3
1 Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Radharaman Institute of Technology and Science Bhopal,
INDIA
2 Head and Prof. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Radharaman Institute of Technology and Science
Bhopal, INDIA
3 Associate. Prof. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Radharaman Institute of Technology and Science
Bhopal, INDIA
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Compact heat exchangers play a pivotal role in
various industrial applications where efficient heat transfer is
paramount. This review paper aims to provide a
comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art in compact
heat exchanger technology, focusing on convective heat
transfer coefficients, rates of heat transfer, fin size
optimization, and the diverse array of heat exchanger types.
The convective heat transfer coefficient is acriticalparameter
for compact heat exchangers, affecting their thermal
performance. This review exploresthelatestresearchfindings,
methodologies, and innovations in enhancing convective heat
transfer coefficients, encompassing both experimental and
computational approaches. It discusses the influence of
various factors such as geometry, fluid properties, and
operating conditions on convective heat transfer coefficients.
Efficiency in heat exchangers is directly tied to the rateofheat
transfer, and this paper examines recent developments in
enhancing heat transfer rates in compact heat exchangers.
Innovations in design, surface modifications, and advanced
materials are discussed to shed light on strategies for
improving heat transfer efficiency while minimizing pressure
drop. Optimizing the size and geometryoffinsincompactheat
exchangers is a challenging task, as it directly impacts the
overall heat exchanger's performance and size. This review
paper delves into the methodologies employed to achieve
optimal fin designs, highlighting advancements in numerical
simulations, experimental techniques, and novel materials
used for fin construction. Furthermore, the paper presents an
extensive overview of the various types of compact heat
exchangers, including plate-fin, microchannel, shell-and-tube,
and printed circuit heat exchangers. It discusses the
advantages, limitations, and specific applicationsofeachtype,
providing insights into their comparative performance and
suitability for different industrial scenarios.
Key Words: Compact Heat Exchangers, Convective Heat
Transfer Coefficient, Rate of Heat Transfer, Fin Size
Optimization, Heat Exchanger Types
1.INTRODUCTION
Heat exchangers are essential components in various
industrial, commercial, and residential applications, serving
as the linchpin for efficient thermal energy transferbetween
fluids or gases. Among the myriad forms of heat exchangers,
compact heat exchangers stand out as key innovationsinthe
pursuit of enhancedthermal performance, reducedfootprint,
and energy conservation. This paper embarks on a
comprehensive exploration of compact heat exchangers,
focusing on critical aspects such as convective heat transfer
coefficients, rates of heat transfer, fin size optimization, and
the rich diversity of heat exchanger type.
1.1 Compact Heat Exchanger
Heat exchangers are essential components in various
industrial, commercial, and residential applications, serving
as the linchpin for efficient thermal energy transfer between
fluids or gases. Among the myriad forms of heat exchangers,
compact heat exchangers stand out as key innovations in the
pursuit of enhanced thermalperformance,reducedfootprint,
and energy conservation. This paper embarks on a
comprehensive exploration of compact heat exchangers,
focusing on critical aspects such as convective heat transfer
coefficients, rates of heat transfer, fin size optimization, and
the rich diversity of heat exchanger type.
1.2 Convective Heat Transfer Coefficients:
One of the pivotal parameters governing heat transfer in
compact heat exchangers is the convective heat transfer
coefficient. This coefficient quantifies the rate at which heat
is exchanged between the fluid and the heat exchanger
surfaces. As such, understanding and optimizing convective
heat transfer coefficients are paramount for achieving
efficient heat exchange. This review delves into the latest
developments in enhancing convective heat transfer
coefficients, encompassing bothexperimental investigations
and advanced computational modeling techniques. It
explores the intricateinterplayoffactorsthatinfluencethese
coefficients, including geometrical configurations, fluid
properties, and operating conditions.
1.3 Rate of Heat Transfer
Efficiency in heat exchangers is often gauged by the rate at
which thermal energy is transferred between the fluid
streams. This rate of heat transfer is not only a function of

convective heat transfer coefficients but alsodependsonthe
design, material selection, andoperational parametersofthe
heat exchanger. This review paper scrutinizes recent
advancements aimed at boosting heat transfer rates within
compact heat exchangers. It elucidates strategies for
improving thermal performance while concurrently
minimizing pressuredrops,which are crucial considerations
in the practical implementation of these devices.
1.4 Fin Size Optimization
The size and geometry of fins within compact heat
exchangers play a pivotal role in determining their overall
thermal performance and physical dimensions. Achieving
the optimal fin design is a multifaceted challenge that
demands a careful balance between increased heat transfer
rates and limited pressure drop.Thispaperexplorescutting-
edge methodologies for fin size optimization, drawing
insights from numerical simulations, experimental
techniques, and the innovative use of materials.
1.5 Types of Heat Exchangers:
Within the realm of compact heat exchangers, a plethora
of design variations and types exists to cater to diverse
applications. This review provides a comprehensive survey
of the major compact heat exchanger types, including plate-
fin, microchannel, shell-and-tube, and printed circuit heat
exchangers. Each type is examined in terms of its
advantages, limitations, and suitabilityforspecific industrial
scenarios, offering readers a holistic understanding of the
array of choices available in the field.
In conclusion, this review paper serves as a valuable
repository of knowledge for researchers, engineers, and
practitioners engaged in heat exchanger technology. By
synthesizing the latest advancements in convective heat
transfer coefficients, heat transfer rates, fin size
optimization, and heat exchanger typology, it seeks to equip
readers with a comprehensive grasp of the contemporary
landscape of compact heat exchangers and their critical role
in achieving efficient thermal energy management in a wide
range of applications.
The demand for efficientheattransfersolutionshasgrown
exponentially in today's energy-conscious world. Heat
exchangers, as devices designed to transfer thermal energy
from one medium to another, are fundamental to numerous
industries, including HVAC (Heating, Ventilation, and Air
Conditioning),automotive,aerospace,powergeneration, and
chemical processing. Amongthese,compactheatexchangers
have emerged as a pioneering and transformative
technology, offering a compact footprint, increased
efficiency, and adaptability to diverse applications.
1.6 Compact Heat Exchangers: Pioneering
Innovation:
Compact heat exchangers represent a paradigm shift in
the realm of thermal engineering. They defy convention by
delivering efficient heat transferwithin remarkablycompact
dimensions, a feat accomplished through ingenious designs
and material advancements. Unlike traditional heat
exchangers, which often necessitate extensive space
allocation and impose significant weight burdens, compact
heat exchangers embody a commitment to space efficiency
without compromising on thermal performance. This
attribute is especially vital in modern engineering where
space is a premium resource, whether in aircraft,
automobiles, or industrial facilities.
1.7 The Crucial Role of Convective Heat Transfer
Coefficients:
Convective heat transfer coefficients are the linchpin of
heat exchanger performance, dictatingtherateatwhichheat
is exchanged between the working fluids. The pursuit of
enhanced heat transfer often centers on optimizing these
coefficients. This paper dives deep into the latest strategies,
innovations, and discoveries in the realm of convective heat
transfer coefficients within compact heat exchangers. The
exploration spans a spectrum of disciplines, from
experimental investigations that unearth real-world
behaviors to computational simulations that unlock new
design possibilities.
1.8 Efficiency and Rate of Heat Transfer:
Efficiency is the watchword for contemporary heat
exchanger design, and this is intrinsically tied to the rate of
heat transfer. Maximizing heat transfer rates while
minimizing energy losses and pressure drops is the holy
grail of heat exchanger engineers. In this review, we embark
on a comprehensive journey through the multifaceted
landscape of heat transfer rate enhancements within
compact heat exchangers. Wescrutinizeadvancedmaterials,
sophisticated geometries, and state-of-the-art techniques
that empower engineers to harnessthefull potential ofthese
devices.
1.9 Finesse in Fin Size Optimization:
Fins, with their intricate designs and configurations, are
central to the performance of compact heat exchangers.
Achieving optimal fin size is a delicate dance, where minute
adjustments can significantlyimpactheattransfer efficiency.
This paper elucidates the methods, algorithms, and
innovations that have emerged to strike the right balance
between heat transfer enhancement and pressure drop
minimization.

1.10 The Tapestry of Heat Exchanger Types:
Compact heat exchangersarenotmonolithic;instead,they
encompass a rich tapestry of types, each tailored to specific
applications. This review serves as a compass, guiding
readers through the labyrinth of heat exchanger typology.
We unravel the intricacies of plate-fin, microchannel, shell-
and-tube, and printed circuit heat exchangers, presenting a
holistic view of their unique characteristics, strengths, and
domains of application.
2. LITERATURE SURVEY
R.P.P.D. da Silva et. al. [1], The paper discusses the
development of theoretical models for the thermal and
hydrodynamic performance of a compact heat exchanger
manufactured using the SLM process, with good agreement
between the models and experimental data. The study also
highlights the negligible impact of surface roughness on
pressure drop and the significant influence of replacing the
core material on thermal performance in the turbulent
regime. Talal M. Abou Elmaaty et. al. [2], Thepaperfocuses
on the research anddevelopmenteffortsforcorrugatedplate
heat exchangers, which are widely used in various
engineering fields and applications. It discusses the
structure, thermal performance, heat transfer enhancement
mechanisms, advantages, andlimitationsofcorrugatedplate
heat exchangers, as well as their efficiency in both single
phase and two-phase flow. Alireza Jafari et. al. [3], The
paper presents experimental andnumerical investigations of
a brazed plate heat exchanger, highlighting the importance
of considering brazing joints in the modelling process. The
study also emphasizes the need for developing new
correlations for Nusselt number and frictionfactorofbrazed
plate heat exchangers, based on the comparison with
existing correlations. Saeed Mohebbi et. al. [4], The paper
presents a numerical investigation of water flow in a small-
sized plate heat exchanger with a chevron type corrugation
pattern, and validates the numerical modeling with
experimental tests. The study examines theinfluenceofflow
regime, heat transfer, and friction on the performance of the
heat exchanger, and concludes that a chevron angle of 60°
and increased corrugation depth or decreased corrugation
pitch result in improved performance. Ji Zhang et. al. [5],
The paper provides a comprehensive review of previous
works on the effects of chevron corrugation geometrical
parameters and heat transfer enhancement techniques in
plate heat exchangers, focusing on passive surface
techniques and the use of nanofluids. It aims to describe
relevant studies, provide an understanding of the heat
transfer mechanisms, evaluate and compare different
enhancementtechniques,andsuggestprospectivedirections
for future research. SalmanAl zahrani et.al.[6],Thepaper
aims to improve the thermal performance of the existing
conventional flat plate heat exchanger (FPHE) by
introducing two modified versions (FPHEm1 and FPHEm2)
and comparing their performance with the conventional
corrugated plate heat exchanger (CPHEC). Computational
fluid dynamics (CFD) technique is used to numerically test
the performance of the heat exchangers, and experiments
are conducted to validate the numerical results. The results
show that FPHEm2 outperforms FPHEC and FPHEm1, with
the best temperature uniformity, highest Nusselt number
(Nu), fanning friction factor(f),andturbulenceintensity.The
f data of FPHEm2 are also significantly lower than those of
CPHEC, making it a potential replacement for both FPHEC
and CPHEC. WagdAjeeb et. al. [7], Nanofluids, due to their
improved thermophysical properties, offer promising
cooling solutions in various applications, such as energy
systems and electronics. This study investigates the
convective heat transfer (CHT) and entropy generation of
ethylene glycol (EG)/water-based nanofluids containing Al
and Al2O3 nanoparticles. The research covers nanoparticle
concentrations ranging from 1.0 to 3.0 vol.% and Reynolds
numbers from 400 to 2000 (laminar flow) under constant
heat flux conditions in a mini-channel. Computational Fluid
Dynamics (CFD) tools are employed, and the numerical
approach is validated with experimental base fluiddata.Key
findings are Both nanofluids exhibitsignificant enhancement
in convective heat transfer (CHT)comparedto thebasefluid.
CHT increases with increasing nanoparticle concentration,
reaching maximum enhancements of 20.3% for Al
nanoparticles and 25.1% for Al2O3 nanoparticles at a
concentration of 3.0 vol.%. Pressure drop increases with
rising nanoparticle concentration and Reynolds number for
both nanofluids. Friction factor increases with nanoparticle
concentration but decreases with increasing Reynolds
number. Entropy generation decreases with increasing
nanoparticle concentration, with lower values for Al
nanofluids compared to Al2O3 nanofluids. Evaluation of
energy efficiency shows no significant change in the overall
system's energy usage with nanofluids due to increased
pumping power. Mehdi Bahiraei et. al. [8], The paper
reviews recent investigations on the use of nanofluids in
various types of heat exchangers, including plate heat
exchangers, double-pipeheatexchangers,shell andtube heat
exchangers, and compact heat exchangers. Italsointroduces
the combination of nanofluids with heat exchangers and
discusses the challenges and opportunities for future
research in this area. S. M. S. Murshed et. al. [9], Nanofluids
have gained global attention due to their unique
thermophysical properties and potential applications in
diverse fields. However, controversies exist in reported
thermal characteristics. This paper reviews and discusses
boiling, spreading, and convective heat transfer in
nanofluids, highlighting the need for further research. S. M.
Sohel Murshed et. al. [10], The paper critically reviews
various aspects of nanofluids, including synthesis, potential
applications, and experimental and analytical studies on
thermophysical properties and electrokinetic properties.
The review highlights the inconsistencies in reported
experimental results of thermophysical properties and the
controversies surrounding the enhanced mechanisms of

nanofluids. W. Ajeeb et. al. [11], This study examines the
influence of nanoparticle type and concentration (Al2O3,
SiO2, and TiO2) on the thermal properties and rheology of
aqueous nanofluids. Results demonstrate enhancedthermal
conductivity (up to 7.3%) with increasing nanoparticle
concentration, alongside Newtonian rheological behavior
and increased viscosity (up to 6.5%). W. Ajeeb et. al. [12],
This study investigates forced convective heat transfer in a
horizontal circular tube with laminar flow of MWCNTs
nanofluid under constant heat flux. Nanofluids' preparation
and characterization were conducted, and various
parameters like heat transfer coefficient, Nusselt number,
pressure drop, friction factor, and wall shear stress were
analyzed, comparing them to the base fluid. Computational
fluid dynamics using finite volume method validated the
simulation model. Results show an average heat transfer
coefficient enhancement of 10% and 14%, with
corresponding pressure drop increases of 9.8% and 16.2%
for 0.25% and 0.5% MWCNTs nanofluids, respectively,
compared to the base fluid. Effects of Reynolds number and
particle volume fraction on heat transfer coefficient,
pressure drop, and wall shear stress are discussed, and the
numerical model aligns well with experimental data. I.
Elbadawy et. al. [13], The paper investigates the impact of
using alumina-water nanofluid with different nanoparticle
concentrations onheattransferandfluidflowcharacteristics
in rectangular microchannel heat sinks. Increasing the
nanoparticle concentration improves the cooling process,
resulting in temperature reduction, increased heat transfer
coefficient, and volume reduction in the microchannels. D
Roque et. al. [14], This study investigates convective heat
transfer characteristics of Al2O3 nanofluids in horizontal
minichannels under laminar and turbulent flow with
constant heat flux conditions. Nanofluids were prepared
using water and a water-ethylene glycol mixture with
varying Al2O3 nanoparticle concentrations. Experimental
modifications were made to an existing setup, with
measurements conducted for both base fluids and
nanofluids. Results, analyzed in terms of Nusselt number
(Nu) and friction factor (f), indicate that the low
concentrations of Al2O3 nanoparticles used did not
significantly enhance heat transfer compared to the base
fluid. Deviations between nanofluidand basefluidresultsfell
within the experimental setup's uncertainty range. A.A.
Awais et. al [15], This paper investigates the impact of
distributor and collector header design on the
thermohydraulic performance of minichannel heat sinks
using nanofluids. Testscompareoptimizedandconventional
header geometries with (Al2O3-H2O) nanofluids and
distilled water. Results reveal superior performance for the
optimized header geometry, with a 17% higher overall heat
transfer coefficient, 43% reduced pressure drop, lowerbase
temperature, and thermal resistance. Performance
evaluation criteria (PEC) show a 41% improvement in
hydraulic performancecomparedtotheconventional design.
Kumar R et. al. [16], This study investigates the
thermofluidic behavior of an Al2O3-water nanofluid-cooled,
branched wavy heat sink microchannel (BWHS MC) across
Reynolds numbers (Re) ranging from 100 to 300, utilizing
ANSYS Fluent for conjugate heat transfer analysis. A full-
domain numerical approach is employed, utilizing the RNG
k-ε model to simulate fluidflow.Thestudyalsocompares the
performance of the BWHS MC with a straight channel heat
sink microchannel (SCHS MC) of the same hydraulic
diameter, conducting experiments alongside simulations.
The results reveal that the branched wavy microchannel
promotes secondary flowandenhancesmacroscopicmixing.
This effect disrupts the boundary layer and forms vortices
near the secondary channel, improving thermal
performance.Despitea higher-pressurepenaltycomparedto
SCHS MC, BWHS MC demonstrates superior overall
performance. Increasing nanofluid concentrations lead to
higher heat transfer coefficientsata givenReynoldsnumber.
Remarkably, the BWHS MC achieves a remarkable 154%
increase in the heat transfer coefficientwitha 2%volumetric
concentration of nanofluids at Re = 300, outperforming the
SCHS MC under similar conditions. Kakac S et. al. [17], This
chapter addresses two common issues in heat exchanger
design: rating and sizing. Rating focuses on calculating the
heat transfer rate and fluid outlet temperatures for given
flow rates, inlet temperatures, and allowablepressuredrops
in an existing heat exchanger with known surface area and
flow passage dimensions. Sizing, on the other hand, involves
selecting an appropriate heat exchanger type and
determining its dimensions to meet specific requirements
for hot and cold fluid inlet/outlet temperatures, flow rates,
and pressure drops. Wen T et. al [18], This study explores
the synergistic effect of using ZnO ethylene glycol
(EG)/water nanofluids in multiport mini channels with
hydraulic diameters of 1.22 mm and 1.42 mm to enhance
heat transfer performance. ZnO nanoparticles (30 nm
diameter) are dispersed in 40%/60% EG/watersolutions to
create nanofluids at 0.75%and1.5%volumeconcentrations.
Both experimental and CFD simulation methods are
employed to assess heat transfer and flow behavior under
various conditions. Experimental findingsshowthatNusselt
numbers improve by 6.7% and 9.8% on average for
nanofluids with 0.75% and 1.5% concentrations,
respectively. However, this enhancement comes at the cost
of increased friction factors, resulting in varying thermal
performance factors (0.94 to 1.31) with average values of
1.05 and 1.07. Reducing channel diameter boosts heat
transfer coefficients and pressure drop while maintaining
nearly the same Nusselt number. A new correlation is
developed to predict Nusselt numbers in ZnO nanofluid
flows within multiport mini channels, with a Mean Absolute
Relative Deviation (MARD) of 9.2%. In numerical
simulations, the single-phase model provides better
predictions for Nusselt number and friction factor with
average relative deviations of approximately 16% and
19.1%, respectively. The mixture model overestimates
Nusselt numbers but offers reasonable friction factor
predictions. This study serves as a valuable reference for
future research on nanofluid behavior in mini channels.

Dovic V et. al. [19], This study aims to enhance our
understanding of complexflowphenomena withinplate heat
exchangers, critical for refining numerical models and
generalized heat transfer and pressure drop correlations
applicable in heat exchanger optimization.Theinvestigation
includes 3D numerical simulations of flow in corrugated
channels with different corrugation angles (β28° and 65°)
across laminar, transient, and turbulent flow conditions.
Visualizations and thermal-hydraulic tests (Re = 0.1–6037)
on corresponding channels validate the study's findings.
Variations in flow patterns significantly impactheattransfer
and pressure drop data. Simulation results are analyzed
along channel sections, considering flow substreams,
velocity distribution, wall shear stress, and wall heat flux
distribution. These results confirm observations from
visualization tests regarding interactionsandcharacteristics
of longitudinal and furrow substreams, as well as the
development of thermal and hydrodynamic flow conditions
within a basic cell. The suitability of comparing simulations
and experimental data based on Fanning friction factor and
Nusselt number is discussed with respect to characteristic
length, hydraulic diameter, and mean velocity at different
flow patterns. Calculated heat transfer and pressure drop
align reasonably well with experimental and literature data.
This analysis highlights the importance of substream
velocity, their interactions, and flow component sizes in
determining heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics
within plate heat exchanger channels. These findings can
contribute to improving CFD modeling, generalized
correlations, and the definition ofRe,Nu,andf, enablingdata
comparison across different geometriesandflowconditions.
Bhattad A et. al. [20], This study focuses on quantifying
improvements in energetic and exergetic performance in a
counter-flow corrugated plate heat exchanger using Al2O3–
MWCNT hybrid nanofluids as a coolant.Experimentsinvolve
different nanoparticle volume ratios (ranging from 5:0 to
0:5) at a 0.01 v% concentration for sub-ambient
temperature applications.Variationsincoolantflowrate(2.0
to 4.0 lpm) and coolant inlet temperature (10 to 25 °C) are
considered. Key findings include: Enhancement of up to
15.2% in the heat transfer coefficient observed for MWCNT
(0:5) nanofluid, with negligible impact on pump work
(0.02%) and a 2.96% increase in the performance index.
Improved hydrothermal performance of nanofluids as
MWCNT ratio in the particle mixtureincreases,withminimal
impact on pressure drop. No optimal nanoparticle ratio
identified within the studied mixture ratios. The study
provides insights into the potential for enhanced heat
exchanger performance using Al2O3–MWCNT hybrid
nanofluids, withvariationsinnanoparticlevolumeratios and
concentrations under different operating conditions.
3. MATH’S
In the field of compact heat exchangers and convective
heat transfer, various mathematical models and equations
are employed to describe heat transfer processes, fluidflow,
and performance characteristics. Here are some common
mathematical models and equations used in this context:
3.1. Heat Conduction Equation:
The heat conduction equation, typically the steady-state or
transient form of the heat equation, is fundamental for
describing heat transfer within solid materials, including
heat exchanger walls. It is typically represented as:
Steady-State Heat Conduction Equation(1D):
Q=U∗A∗ΔTlm
Where:
 Q is the rate of heat transfer (in Watts).
 U is the overall heat transfer coefficient (in Watts
per square meter Kelvin, W/m²K).
 A is the effective heat transfer area (in square
meters, m²).
 ΔTlm is the logarithmic mean temperature
difference (in Kelvin, K).
3.2 Reynolds Number (Re):
The Reynolds number is used to characterize the flow
regime within heat exchangers. It is defined as:
Re=ρuL/μ
Where:
 ρ is the fluid density (kg/m^3).
 u is the fluid velocity (m/s).
 L is a characteristic length (e.g., hydraulicdiameter)
(m).
 μ is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid (Pa·s).
3.3. Nusselt Number (Nu):
The Nusselt number is used to describe convective heat
transfer and is defined as:
Nu=hL/k
Where:
 h is the convective heat transfer coefficient
(W/m^2·K).
 k is the thermal conductivity of the fluid (W/m·K).
 L is a characteristic length (e.g., hydraulicdiameter)
(m).
3.4. Darcy-Weisbach Equation:
This equation is commonlyusedtodescribepressuredrop
in fluid flow through heat exchanger channels, pipes, or
ducts. It is represented as:

ΔP=f(L/D)ρu2/2
Where:
 ΔP is the pressure drop (Pa).
 f is the Darcy friction factor (dimensionless).
 L is the length of the flow path (m).
 D is the hydraulic diameter (m).
 ρ is the fluid density (kg/m^3).
 u is the fluid velocity (m/s).
3.6. Colburn Equation:
The Colburn equation relates the Nusselt number (Nu),
Reynolds number (Re), and Prandtl number (Pr) to predict
convective heat transfer coefficients in specific geometries:
Nu=0.023Re0.8Pr0.3
This equation provides an estimation of the Nusselt number
based on the flow conditions and fluid properties.
3.7. Effectiveness-NTU Method:
This method is commonly used to analyze and predict the
performance of heat exchangers, particularly when dealing
with non-uniform temperature distributions. It involves the
use of the heat exchanger effectiveness (ε) and the number
of transfer units (NTU) and is often expressed as:
ε=1−e−NTU(1+C)
Where:
 ε is the heat exchanger effectiveness
(dimensionless).
 NTU is the number of transfer units
(dimensionless).
 C is the heat capacity rate ratio (C = Cr for parallel
flow, C = 2Cr for counterflow).
These mathematical models and equations provide the
foundation for analysing and designing compact heat
exchangers, optimizing their performance, and predicting
their thermal and hydraulic behaviour under various
operating conditions. The specific choice of equations
depends on the geometry, flow regime, and other
characteristics of the heat exchanger system in question.
4. FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Computational Fluid
Dynamics (CFD) are powerful numerical techniques used in
the analysis and design of heat exchangers, including
compact heat exchangers. Here, we'll provideanoverview of
how FEA and CFD are applied in this context, along with
some equations and models commonly used:
4.1. Finite Element Analysis (FEA):
FEA is often used for structural analysis of heat
exchangers to ensure they can withstand thermal and
mechanical stresses. Key equations and models used in FEA
for heat exchangers include:
4.2. Stress-Strain Relationship:
The fundamental equation used in structural FEA is
Hooke's Law, which relates stress (σ) to strain (ε) for linear
elastic materials:
σ=E⋅ε
Where:
 E is the material's Young's Modulus (Pa)
4.3. Thermal Stress:
When analyzing heat exchangers, temperature variations
can induce thermal stresses. The equation forthermal stress
(σthermal)is given by:
σthermal=α⋅ΔT⋅E
Where:
 α is the coefficient of thermal expansion (1/K)
 ΔT is the temperature change (K)
4.4. FEA Mesh:
The heat exchanger geometry is divided into finite
elements, and the equations areappliedtoeachelement. The
mesh generation is a crucial step in FEA.
4.5. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD):
CFD is used to simulate and analyze fluid flow and heat
transfer within heat exchangers. Common equations and
models used in CFD for heat exchangers include:
4.5.1. Navier-Stokes Equations:
These equations govern fluid flow and are often solved
numerically in CFD simulations. The incompressible form of
the Navier-Stokes equations is:
∂t/∂u+(u⋅∇) u=−1/ ρ (∇P) +ν∇2u
Where:
 u is the velocity vector
 P is the pressure
 ρ is the fluid density
 ν is the kinematic viscosity

4.5.2. Heat Transfer Equations:
CFD also solves heat transfer equations to analyze
temperature distribution within the heat exchanger. The
heat conduction equation is used for solid components:
q=−k⋅∇T
Where:
 q is the heat flux
 k is the thermal conductivity
 T is the temperature
4.5.3. Turbulence Models:
For modeling turbulent flows, various turbulence models
like the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes(RANS)equations
or Large Eddy Simulation (LES) are used to capture
turbulence effects.
Turbulence models in Computational Fluid Dynamics
(CFD) are used to simulate the behavior of turbulent flows,
which are characterized by chaotic and swirling motion.
These models provide a way to predict the distribution of
turbulence properties within a fluid domain. One commonly
used turbulence model is the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-
Stokes (RANS) model. Here's an explanation of the RANS
model with its key equations:
 Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS)
Model:
The RANS model aims to predict the time-averaged flow
properties, including velocity and pressure, as well as the
turbulent properties, such as turbulence kinetic energy (k)
and turbulent dissipation rate (ε). The key equations of the
RANS model are the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes
equations, along with equations for turbulence quantities:
 Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations
(RANS Equations):
TheReynolds-averagedNavier-Stokesequationsarebased
on the decomposition of flow variables into mean and
fluctuating components. The equationsforthemeanvelocity
components (u, v, w) and pressure (P) are as follows:
Continuity Equation (for incompressible flow):
∇⋅U=0
Momentum Equations (for the x, y, and z directions):
∂(u)/∂t+(u⋅∇)u=−1/ρ(∇P)+ν∇2u−∂(u′u′)/∂x−∂(u′v′)/∂y−
∂(u′w′)/∂z + ∂(τij)/∂x
(Similar equations for v and w)
Where:
 U=(u,v,w) is the mean velocity vector
 ρ is the fluid density
 ν is the kinematic viscosity
 P is the mean pressure
 u′u′, u′v′, u′w′, and τij representtheReynoldsstresses
(turbulent components of the stress tensor), which
are modelled based on turbulence models.
Turbulence Quantities Equations (k-ε Model):
In a k-ε turbulence model, two additional transport
equations are solved to predict turbulencekinetic energy (k)
and the turbulent dissipation rate (ε):
 Transport Equation for Turbulence Kinetic Energy
(k):
∂(k)/ ∂t +(u⋅∇)k=∂/∂xj [(ν+νt) ∂k/∂xj]−ui′uj′ ∂ui/∂xj −ρϵ
 Transport Equation for Turbulent Dissipation Rate
(ε):
∂(ϵ)/ ∂t +(u⋅∇)ϵ= ∂/∂xj [(ν+νt) ∂ϵ/∂xj]+C1ϵ/k [2ui′uj′ ∂k
/∂xj]−C2ρϵ2/k
Where:
νt is the turbulent viscosity, typicallymodelledasνt=Cμk2
/ϵ
C1 and C2 are model constants
ui′uj′ represents the Reynolds stresses
5. CONCLUSION
In this comprehensive review paper, we have embarked
on a journey through the intricate world of compact heat
exchangers, exploring their design, performance, and the
underlying principles that govern their operation. Our
exploration has spanned key aspects, including convective
heat transfer coefficients, rates of heat transfer, fin size
optimization, and the diverse array of heat exchanger types.
Here, we summarize the key takeaways and implications
drawn from our investigation:
Compact heat exchangers have emerged as pioneering
innovations, redefining the landscape of thermal
engineering. Their ability to efficiently transfer heat while
occupying minimal space has positioned them at the
forefront of diverse industrial applications, from aerospace
to energy generation. Convective heat transfer coefficients
have been a focal point of our discussion. We've delved into
the latest research, methodologies,andinnovationsaimed at
enhancing these coefficients. Factors such as geometry,fluid
properties, and operating conditions have been scrutinized
to uncover strategies for optimizing thermal performance.
Efficiency in heat exchangers hinges on the rate of heat
transfer. We've explored advanced materials, surface

modifications,anddesignprinciplesthatempowerengineers
to maximize heat transfer rates while minimizing pressure
drops, vital considerations in real-world applications. The
size and design of fins within compact heat exchangers are
pivotal to their thermal performance. Our review has
provided insights into methodologies for fin size
optimization, ranging from numerical simulations to
experimental techniques, ensuring that the right balance
between heat transfer enhancement and pressure drop
minimization is struck.
REFERENCES
[1] R.P.P. da Silva, et al., Thermal and hydrodynamic
analysis of a compact heat exchanger produced by
additive manufacturing, Appl. Therm. Eng. 193 (2021),
116973.
[2] T.M. Abou Elmaaty, A.E.Kabeel,M.Mahgoub,Corrugated
plate heat exchanger review, Renew. Sustain. Energy
Rev. 70 (2017) 852–860.
[3] A. Jafari, A. Sadeghianjahromi, C.C. Wang, Experimental
and numerical investigation of brazed plate heat
exchangers – A new approach, Appl. Therm. Eng., 200
(August 2021) (2022) 117694.
[4] S. Mohebbi, F. Veysi, Numerical investigation of small
plate heat exchangers performance having different
surface profiles, Appl. Therm. Eng., 188(September
2020) (2021) 116616.
[5] J.i. Zhang, X. Zhu, M.E. Mondejar, F. Haglind, A review of
heat transfer enhancement techniques in plate heat
exchangers, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 101 (2019)
305–328.
[6] S. Al zahrani, M.S. Islam, S.C. Saha, Heat transfer
enhancement of modified flat plate heat exchanger,
Appl. Therm. Eng., 186(January) (2021) 116533.
[7] W. Ajeeb, S.M.S. Murshed, Numerical studyofconvective
heat transfer performance, entropy generation and
energy efficiency of Al and Al2O3 nanofluids in
minichannel, J. Nanofluid. 12 (2023),
https://doi.org/10.1166/jon.2023.1903.
[8] M. Bahiraei, R. Rahmani, A. Yaghoobi, E. Khodabandeh,
R. Mashayekhi, M. Amani, Recentresearchcontributions
concerning use of nanofluids in heat exchangers: A
critical review, Appl. Therm. Eng. 133 (January) (2018)
137–159.
[9] S.M.S. Murshed, C.A. Nieto De Castro, M.J.V. Loureno,
M.L.M. Lopes, F.J.V. Santos, A review of boiling and
convective heat transfer with nanofluids, Renew.
Sustain. Energy Rev. 15 (5) (2011) 2342–2354.
[10] S.M.S. Murshed, K.C. Leong, C. Yang,Thermophysical and
electrokinetic propertiesofnanofluids-Acritical review,
Appl. Therm. Eng. 28 (2008) 2109–2125.
[11] W. Ajeeb, R.R.S.T. Silva, S.M.S. Murshed, Rheology and
Thermal Conductivity of Three Metallic Oxides
Nanofluids, in: 7th World Congress on Momentum,Heat
and Mass Transfer (MHMT’22), 2022, pp. 7–10. DOI:
10.11159/enfht22.234.
[12] W. Ajeeb, M.S.A. Oliveira, N. Martins, B. Abreu,
Experimental and numerical study of convective heat
transfer and laminar flow of a MWCNTs nanofluid in a
horizontal tube, J. Nanofluid 8 (1) (2019) 1–11.
[13] I. Elbadawy, M. Fayed, Reliability of Al2O3 nanofluid
concentration on the heat transfer augmentation and
resizing for single and double stack microchannels,
Alexandria Eng. J. 59 (3) (2020) 1771–1785.
[14] D. Roque, W. Ajeeb, S.M.S. Murshed, J.M.C. Pereira,
Forced convection heat transfercharacteristicsofAl2O3
nanofluids in a minichannel- an experimental study, J.
Phys. Conf. Ser. 2116 (2021), 012056,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2116/1/012056.
[15] A.A. Awais, M.H. Kim, Experimental andnumerical study
on the performance of a minichannel heat sink with
different header geometries using nanofluids, Appl.
Therm. Eng. vol. 171, no. February (2020), 115125.
[16] R. Kumar, B. Tiwary, P.K. Singh, Thermofluidic analysis
of Al2O3-water nanofluid cooled branched wavy heat
sink, Appl. Therm. Eng. vol. 201, no. PA (2022), 117787.
[17] S. Kakaç, H. Liu, Heat Exchangers: Selection, Rating and
Thermal Design, second ed., CRCPressLLC,Florida,USA,
2002
[18] T. Wen, L. Lu, S. Zhang, H. Zhong, Experimental study
and CFD modelling on the thermal and flow behavior of
EG/water ZnO nanofluid in multiport mini channels,
Appl. Therm. Eng. 182 (2021) 116089.
[19] D. Dovi´c, I. Horvat, P. Filipovi´c, Impact of velocitiesand
geometry on flow components and heattransferinplate
heat exchangers, Appl. Therm. Eng., 197 (2021) p.
117371 Contents.
[20] A. Bhattad, J. Sarkar, P. Ghosh, Experimentationoneffect
of particle ratio on hydrothermal performance of plate
heat exchanger using hybrid nanofluid, Appl. Therm.
Eng. 162 (April) (2019), 114309.

Advancements in Compact Heat Exchangers: A Comprehensive Review

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Advancements in Compact Heat Exchangers: A Comprehensive Review

Similar to Advancements in Compact Heat Exchangers: A Comprehensive Review (20)

More from IRJET Journal

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Advancements in Compact Heat Exchangers: A Comprehensive Review