North Korea's Nuclear Program

War On Terrorism And Terrorism
War on Terrorism The most current and imminent threat to the future of the United States is foreign
terrorism, which occurs primarily outside the US territory, due to the increasing development in
weapons of mass destruction. Although, the US in the last two decades has seen an increase of
terrible acts of terrorism here in own country. These foreign and domestic entities utilize
intimidation and violence for their political gain or religious beliefs, by instilling fear in innocent
lives. Terrorists also utilize suicide bombing and cyber–attacks in their trail of torment. The United
States is a target of these acts due to our magnitude and authority, and it is imperative that our
Nations security is vigilant and constantly prepared at a moment's notice to maintain our safety.
Prior to September 11, 2001, terrorist activity produced a wave of attacks on the "United States'
marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983, the World Trade Center in 1993, American embassies in Kenya
and Tanzania in 1998, and the USS Cole in 2000" (397). Assassinating important individuals or
small number of people was the focus of early terroristic attacks. On September 11, 2001, the World
Trade Center towers in New York buckled after they were hit by an al–Qaeda organization that
seized the airplanes. Osama bin Laden, was the leader of the militant Islamic terrorist group that
lead the attacks. The group proceeded with one plane that crashed into the Pentagon near
Washington, D. C., and a fourth
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

The Relationship Between Mass Media And The Media
Introduction The media and I have a history of disagreeing. I have referred to them with many
derogatory names, of which they deserve, and continue to see their faults in 2017 (Truman, 1951). I
am particularly interested in how Breitbart and CNN use their influence on the public to further the
partisan divide. Politics seem based more on who the public does not like, rather than who they are
in favor of. Profound changes in the relationship between news media and policy makers have
emerged as byproducts of new, faster communications technology. These changes present some
advantages like fast and widespread coverage nationally and globally, interactive feedback between
journalists and audiences, and convenience. The disadvantages are detrimental, however. The sheer
volume of information available to the public poses a threat due to the fact that oftentimes citizens
know more than their government officials, and information is leaked and hacked more easily. This
is another way that the media can influence the public: "accidentally" leaking information that may
or may not be completely false. Many news organizations feign impartiality, and act as though they
would never intentionally spread deceptive information, but I know this to be a falsehood (Truman,
1961, 115). Mass media has motivations from their CEOs and sponsors, but also from corrupt
politicians who buy out journalists and entire franchises to ensure that they aren't attacked by that
particular organization

Wmd (Weapons Of Mass Destruction)
WMD(Weapons of Mass Destruction)
"A world without nuclear weapons would be less stable and more dangerous for all of us."(Margaret
Thatcher). Although this quote sounds ridiculous, it is absolutely right. Arguments have been made
by President Obama that "nuclear weapons are the greatest threat to U.S. security." However, history
proves that weapons of mass destruction whether– biological, nuclear, chemical or radioactive, are a
necessary evil to sustain global stability, deter attacks from rogue nations and encourage diplomacy.
Weapons of Mass Destruction sustain global peace by keeping the most powerful nations honest.
Currently the United States, Russia, China, UK, North Korea, India, Pakistan, Israel and France all
possess WMD. Of these nations the U.S. is the most prepared to deploy its weapons, while Russia
reportedly has the most WMD's. These nations are the most ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
North Korean Leader Kim Jong II, and Iran's Leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad both threaten to attack
the United States and its allies, conduct tests, and oppress their own people. However, when feeling
threatened each leader has ultimately come to the bargaining table to discuss sanctions. Why?
Because these rogue leaders know that attacking a world power in possession of WMD's would be
suicide. And they want to live.
Weapons of Mass Destruction encourage world leaders to talk rather than attack. There are two
deadly implications of using WMD's. First, the innocent victims are killed in the other country.
Second, more innocent victims are killed when the country responds with their own WMD's.
Diplomacy is the profession, activity, or skill of managing international relations. In this case it's an
action, the action of threating the use of such weapons calms down both sides in conflict. This is a
win–win. Each side gets to talk tough and save face and maintain their status in their

Nuclear Issue in the North Korea from the Eyes of...
Introduction Nuclear issue in the North Korea has been a problem widely discussed around the
world in recent years, while the whole progress from the start of the nuclear crisis (The withdrawal
of the North Korea from the Nuclear Non–Proliferation Treaty in 2003) to the cooperation (Six
Party Talks) and its failure is quite dramatic and worth exploring (Fang, 2009). This paper attempted
to use two perspectives including neorealism and neoliberalism to look at the issue, and examine
their explanatory power. Accordingly, this paper recognized the importance of the two perspectives
in explaining the issue. On one hand, neorealism showed the restraints and balancing behaviors of
the states during the process of negotiation, implying the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Firstly, anarchy leads to International cooperation. Under anarchical status, states feeling unsafe due
to no supreme authority. Thus, they tend to set up regime regulating states' behavior to prevent
defection. In this case, states are willing, though not able to cooperate with others. Regarding the
unit of analysis, neoliberalism believed states are important, but other actors such as IOs, NGOs,
non–state actors are also worth discussing since many issues under globalization cannot be merely
solved by the states and military power. To explore more about the mindset of neoliberalism, Robert
Keohane (2000) suggested the idea of complex interdependence. To begin with, non–state actors can
participate in international politics directly, while transnational world breaks down the assumption
of state as the only actor, and increases the importance of non–state actors like NGOs and TNCs.
Besides, international issues are complicated, breaking down the level of politics. In other words,
there is no absolute difference or hierarchy between high politics like military security and low
politics like public affairs and economy. Thirdly, military power is important for balancing, but it is
not the only method to solve the problems. Military power, for example, cannot solve economic
problems. While interdependence between states becomes more and more prominent under the
increasingly globalizing world, the costs of using force to resolve disputes therefore become much

Nuclear Weapons : The Three Types Of Weapons Of Mass...
Weapons of mass destruction, (WMD), as the name would imply are extremely powerful and very
deadly. There are three types of WMDs, chemical, biological, and nuclear (Chernotsky and Hobbs
2013: 103). The difference between WMD and conventional weapons is that WMD kill a lot more
and with no discrimination. Chemical weapons, such as mustard gas, are banned in war because of
how inhumane it was during the world wars. Biological weapons can be just as deadly as chemical
weapons if the disease is released in a highly populated area. This can cripple a country without
even firing a single bullet (104). Nuclear weapons are commonly viewed as the most destructive
force on the Earth. There are currently 15,000 nuclear weapons in the world with 1,800 are on high
alert and can be launched at a moment's notice (Kristensen and Norris 2017: 289). This is more than
enough nuclear weapons to end the world. Nuclear weapons are very powerful and if the initial blast
does not kill a person, the shockwaves, and radiation will(Nuclear Threat Initiative, "Nuclear 101",
Module 4). Most of the nuclear weapons belong to the United States and Russia, each with around
7,000. The rest of the UN security council have nuclear weapons as well, but not nearly as many.
France comes the closest with 300 and China and England have around 200 each. Pakistan, India,
and Israel all have nuclear weapons but they have even fewer than China and England. It is
unknown how many nuclear weapons North Korea has, but

North Korean Nuclear Program Essay
The North Korean government continues to financially fund the research and testing of nuclear and
ballistic missiles. Little information is known about the North Korean nuclear program and has been
made available to foreign nations due to the secrecy and isolation of international affairs. The threat
of a nuclear strike from North Korea has become an increasingly serious matter for many nations
including the U.S. and its Asian allies, Japan and South Korea. Currently, there are only nine nations
known by intelligent analysis that possesses the resources to manufacture nuclear weapons which do
include the U.S. However, North Korea is the only nation in the 21st century to conduct a nuclear
missile test that has been reported by North Korean ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Back in Washington, President Clinton's administration concluded that North Korea was reviving
their nuclear missile program and demanded access to the suspected facilities being built.
Pyongyang, the capital of North Korea, granted access to multiple locations to U.S. officials for
inspection of facilities in exchange for financial aid and food (Hathaway & Tama 724). North
Korea's negotiation for aid from the U.S. does not come as a surprise for the simple fact that citizens
living under the supreme leadership of Kim Jong–un live in absolute poverty. Although the state–
run government experiences hardship by trying to provide an adequate supply of food for citizens;
the government spends a huge sum of money to maintain a large military force. North Korea was
not pleased with the accusations that they were constructing underground nuclear development
facilities and demanded the U.S. to compensate a large sum of financial aid to the state–government
for defamation. The nation demand for $300 million or other economic benefits and food aid
equivalent to that amount is claimed "very just, because once [North Koreans] open an object,
which is very sensitive in view of their national security... they cannot use it for its original purpose
(Park 538). In addition, North Korea counteracted the U.S. accusations of conducting nuclear
missile testing by accusing the

How Did The Cold War Affect The Korean War
Bryan Sanchez Espinoza
Mr. Munoz
World History
Period 7
5 May 2017
Korean War affect on the Cold War and the two superpowers As said by Chegg Study "The Cold
War is the name given to the relationship that developed primarily between the USA and the USSR
after World War Two. The Cold War was to dominate international affairs for decades and many
major crises occurred – the Cuban Missile Crisis, Vietnam, Hungary and the Berlin Wall being just
some. For many, the growth in weapons of mass destruction was the most worrying issue."
The Korean War started on June 25, 1950. The Cold War had no military action but as of June 25,
1950 that all changed. The first military action of the Cold War began when 75,000 soldiers of
North Korea crossed the 38th parallel (history.com). The 38th parallel was the boundary between
the democratic North Korea and the Republic South Korea (history.com). The United States sent
American troops immediately ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
America losing people in this war is probably the biggest lost they had. The United States was
affected politically. Since the Korean War was the first war during the Cold War it set the norm for
conflicts that would happen later on. This War created the idea of what is called a limited war. This
meant that there were two powerhouse countries that would fight which created the idea of a limited
war, where the two superpowers would fight in another country, forcing the people in that nation to
suffer the bulk of the destruction and death involved in a war between such large nations. The
superpowers avoided descending into an all–out war with one another, as well as the mutual use of
nuclear weapons. It also expanded the Cold War, which to that point had mostly been concerned
with Europe. The Korean war also caused the United States to keep a military presence in Korea to
guard against any future North Koreans attacks which it has maintained up until the

North Korea Has No Ambition for Nuclear Proliferation...
There has been an increase in the support of taking forceful actions towards North Korea which has
seemed to be unpredictable in its steps and decision taken especially in terms of security. It has
maintained its stand on the nuclear arsenal and other programs associated to it, creating a threat to
the security of the whole region and the whole in general (Kim, 2002 pg.6). It has also refused to
involve itself in any form of negotiation making the other nations abandon further negotiations and
are determined to take some forceful action against it. I greatly disagree with the stand of forceful
cause of action being taken against North Korea and the withdrawal of any further talks. The
involvement of the North Korea in the nuclear plan ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It has emphasized in economic policies and relations which some of these nations that show more
interest in the economic policies than political interests. This is a great indicator that North Korea
given if not taken as a threat by these international can help improve their economic policy and
activities from the interactions.
The economy of North Korea is well structured to favor their economic activities. There is existence
of a monopoly system in such an economy that allows for strict scrutiny of economic policies
applicable there. Therefore there is no way North Korea will be a treat to the rest of the international
nations when it is allowed to carry on with nuclear programs. In the recent past North Korea has
revealed its nuclear ambitions where it can be recognized as a nuclear weapons producing state.
This can be linked to its gains into the economy. This emphasizes on the role of a larger trading
market and investments. The outcome generated from the sale of these nuclear weapons can be
reinvested back to the economy to increase the general productivity.
By North Korea involving itself in large production of nuclear weapons say for example for these
international nations it will also improve the conditions in the economy that enable a smooth
production process. In the other hand if North Korea is taken as a threat to the other nations which
are

Pros And Cons Of The Weaponization Of North Korea
Ladies and gentlemen, honorable chairs and delegates it is an honor to be participating in the GLIS
MUN 12 and debate about the global issues that this society confronts.
The weaponization of the DPRK and its continual development of nuclear weapons threaten the
global society even at the moment and this delegate feels strong responsibility of coaxing this
problem that has not shown significant improvement ever since its first controversy
The North Korea's exit from the NPT means that they are able to build nuclear arms without
international restrictions which pose a potential threat. Since then, the United States have poured its
effort in improving bilateral relationships but still North Korea is unresponsive in discussing in the
Six–Party talks. Economic sanctions were executed which isolated North Korea from international
parties, but the results were not significant. This ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For these reasons military interventions are out of the question. The United States will continue to
remain strong alliances with South Korea and include a close coordination of policy towards North
Korea. The DPRK will not be giving up their weapons but promised to not make any further
developments if the previous sanctions are nullified and an aiding program is provided. The current
situation shows that both countries are experiencing the prisoner's dilemma whereas mutual
credibility and cooperation will bring benefits to both countries and solve this dilemma. Not
knowing when another attack or a devastating incident might occur, the United States will like to
finally ask for the other delegations' support of such measures that has a bright prospective focusing
on deterring the usage of nuclear weaponry of DPRK. The United States of America is resolute of
making changes and this delegate hopes to reach an effective

World War II : Will Humanity End Itself Through The...
World War III Will World War III ever happen? Will humanity end itself through the destruction of
nuclear war? Will the world start another global war. A major war could lead civilization to ruin,
taking many people 's lives through the process. As technology advances, weapons are stronger than
ever before, able to wreak havoc on large cities. Even though World War III is associated with
nuclear warfare in the people 's mind, it is unlikely there would be a massive nuclear war. The
superpowers of the world just fight proxy war, for example Vietnam. However, World War III is
improbable, there could be leaders who will make insane decisions, and the over aggression of
Russia, that could lead to WW3. World War III is a hypothetical War among different countries.
Also, Nuclear warfare, or other times Thermonuclear or Atomic warfare, is a artillery conflict or
bureaucratic strategy to cause massive destruction from nuclear weaponry. On July 28, 1914, World
War I started from the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, who was the archduke of Austria–Hungary.
The assassin, Gavrilo Princip, was a serbian nationalist who had connections with a military group,
the Black Hands. Then on September 1, 1939, World War II started from Germany invading Poland,
and Britain and France declared war to germany, as Hitler refused his invasion of Poland. World
War 1 was supposed to be, "a war that will end war"(H.G. Wells) Then World War II started, which
went to a much larger scale than World War

How Does North Korea Pose A Global Threat
The belligerent nation known as North Korea doesn't pose a global threat because their state of
privacy and their display and distribution of arms. Many great leaders, have tactics of showing their
threats, but many are hoaks and have been disproved. Isolation in history has proven to have many
disadvantages in past history.
North Korea doesn't pose a global threat because of their isolation, the most biased nation is
considerably North Korea, they have been proven time by time to provide incorrect information for
the amount of malleable resources they obtain. One state that had massive isolation is Cuba, they
have been the laughing stalk of a country, due to their dictatorships. Cuba has been limited as a
nation, due to their actions such ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Time after time the videos that North Korea sends out to threaten the United States or United
Nations have been proved to be hoaxes or propaganda. The true potential of their weapons of mass
destructions are known, but the last test had resulted in a 5.3 magnitude which is relatively weak
and is most likely not able to travel far enough to wreck havoc in any states that it has tensions with.
The isolation of the nation within the past centuries has been a proven practice all the way from the
Choson Dynasty. The constant isolation can cause fear in many, but others take it as a way of slowly
dying off, as the amount of resources that is available in one land is limited. Recently China has
banned imports of coal from North Korea due to rising tensions between these two nations. Overall
the current status of North Korea is unknown the amount of actual damage they could cause is
limited, but we are not aware of the actual impact they can cause. The sheer isolation of the nation
has proven to be a disadvantage, but has been able to keep many information secret from the world.
In conclusion the North Korean pose of arms does not pose a global threat because the leaders
behind it, the amount of technology available, and the lack of new technology being able to keep up
with the

The Proliferation Of Weapons Of Mass Destruction
To what extent do WMDs and their proliferation present a threat to global security and what are
possible solutions? Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and Threats to Global Security
The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction is one of the foremost threats challenging global
security today. The United States should take an offensive strategy and re–emphasize its nuclear
program due to the current affairs around the globe and the growing threat of the use of weapons of
mass destruction against our citizens, allies and vital interests. The existing arms control
agreements, such as the 1968 Non–Proliferation Treaty and the prohibition of biological weapons of
1972, have not been able to address the issues of weapons of mass ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Movement of illegal imports and the exchange of money can be completed with virtually no
restrictions depending on the place and time due to relaxed import and export laws, lack of
enforcement controls, and electronic system networks. Furthermore, many governments seem to be
unwilling or unable to implement control over the development, storage, or use of these weapons.
More problematic are the shifting ideologies and international relationships that have occurred over
the decades following the cold war. Today there is little doubt terrorist groups or states would use
weapons of mass destruction to further their interests if they were available. The 9/11 Commission
Report documented that Usama bin Laden in an interview with ABC television had called for
Muslims to kill Americans without regard to their status claiming all Americans were "targets." He
had also attempted to purchase weapons–grade enriched uranium for over $1.5 million dollars in an
effort to make an atomic bomb. Although the material later turned out not to be uranium, it clearly
indicated the terrorist's intent to discharge nuclear weapons without regard to the subsequent fallout
of loss of lives, environmental or economic impacts worldwide.[footnoteRef:2] According to
Frederick Mattis, in Banning Weapons of Mass Destruction, nuclear weapons are still considered to
be the ultimate weapon of mass

Nuclear Weapons, Biological And Chemical And Biological...
As many scholars have suggested, Libya's renouncement of nuclear, chemical and biological
weapons shows us a possible solution for the so–called rogue regimes including North Korea. North
Korea presumably continues to possessing nuclear, biological and chemical weapons programs and
continues to develop its nuclear program to the extent that the Democratic People's Republic of
Korea (DPRK) conducted its fifth nuclear test. Experts warn that DPRK can reach its capacity to
complete its Inter–Continental Ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and target the U.S. by 2020. Under these
circumstances, can any policy recommendations be drawn from the precedents regarding Libya?
Three authors, Malfrid Braut–Hegghammer, Dafna Hochman and Peter Viggo Jakobsen have
written about Libya's renouncement of nuclear weapons and they all address the following
questions: What was the condition that made Libya dismantle nuclear weapons? Was the 2003
attack on Iraq the only reason that forced Libya to renounce nuclear weapons as supported by the
Bush administration? Moreover, Jakobson and Hochman suggest what policy implications would be
to curb the DPRK's ambitions for Weapons of Mass Destruction(WMDs). What was the condition
that drove Libya to renounce the nuclear weapons? The three essays commonly address the
condition that made Libya dismantle nuclear weapons. Braut–Hegghammer and Hochman focus on
the reason why the Libyan regime decided to dismantle nuclear weapons.

Write An Essay On 1984 By George Orwell
According to CNN News Fumio Kishida a foreign minister of Japan sites the city of Hiroshima sits
in a beautiful location, surrounded by sea and mountains. It has rich culture and history, and has
been a symbol of peace and hope since its recovery from the atomic bombing in 1945. However,
this is another issue of nuclear and mass destruction of weapons can lead fear and control over
people. During the cold war is when everyone was in fear and had hatred over other countries
besides their own. Nuclear weapons do not create no peace.
For example, the author of 1984, Orwell explains how O'Brien the leader of the party. The party is
the government of Oceania. O'Brien discusses how power controls everything over human beings,
but above all power controls over the mind. Fear, rage, triumph, and self–abasement is what builds
the society of Oceania. "Nothing exists outside the mind", O'Brien explains. I agree ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Over all though if I was living in a society such as North Korea, I would not noticed there is
anything wrong. Everyone around me would all be the same. I could survive in a society compare to
North Korea and Oceania. In all the celebrations of North Korea, I would be just as all the other
people excited for their level of deadly weapons.
Although there are some countries that are examples of the opposite of a society full of fear and
hate. For example, the United states is rule by the people, but even the government limits the power
of the people. The U.S. government yearns to be the central control of everything. The U.S. little by
little relates more to the book 1984. In 1984 there are telescreens in every room watching over
everyone. Likewise, the U.S. has cameras in public areas and hack into anyones phone without
permission to see what anyone is doing. In all societies there are still similarities to the one O'Brien

The United States Government ( Usg ) And Department Of...
East Asia continues to present a broad spectrum of opportunities and challenges to the United States,
our allies, and partners. The United States Government (USG) and Department of Defense (DoD)
continues to work closely with its allies and partners to build relationships and capacity vital to
advancing U.S. national interests of security, prosperity, international order, and the promotion of
universal values. The most profound and alarming trend within the East Asia region over the past
several years is the increasing belligerence and defiance of the Kim Jung–un regime of North Korea.
The United States regards the coercive activities by North Korea, in particular its pursuit of
Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and ballistic missile capabilities, to comprise the most urgent
security threat in the region. The USG is fully committed to maintaining peace throughout the
Korean Peninsula by effectively working with our allies and other regional states to deter and
defend against North Korean military provocations, weapons proliferation, and illicit trafficking;
and to support enforcement of international sanctions restricting North Korean arms trade and other
prohibited activities.
In order to protect and advance U.S. national interests, while operating within the increasingly
volatile environment on the Korean Peninsula, the United States must remain vigilant in deterring
activities by the Kim Jung–un regime that threaten U.S. interests. Additionally, the DoD must
remain

1994 Agreed Framework Case Study
In 2001, shortly after the Bush administration took office, they reviewed the Clinton
administrations' engagement policy toward North Korea in order to halt North Korea's missile
program. Intending to distance itself from his predecessor, the Bush administration pursued hard–
line policy. He came up with the reformulated policy, which was the US will lift further sanctions
and provide more assistance to North Korea if they agreed to "1) start to take serious, verifiable
steps to reduce the conventional weapons threat to the South, 2) undertake "improved
implementation" of the 1994 Agreed Framework, and 3) allow verifiable "constraints" on North
Korea's missile exports". The 1994 Agreed Framework stated that the US commitment to provide
economic,

Essay On The Hobbit Vs The Korean War
Page
1
of 4
ZOOM
Wavy GriggsMr. ArmstrongEnglish comp. II T–R 9:2523 September, 2017The Hobbit Vs. The
ToupeeNorth Korea and America seem to be all that is talked about in modern day media. Does
anyone know the true motives of the participants, no, but what is known is that tensions are high.
While North Korea claims to want overall protection from capitalist society, America claims that the
North Korean Government is a terror regime with weapons of mass destruction. Both sides have
defensive standpoints and reasonable suspicion. Clearly, with tensions rising action being taken is
only a matter of time. A compromise must be agreed on to settle the two nations. With all but peace
talks being put into play, a mandated compromise allowing the North Korean government an ability
to defend itself, and allowing America the safety of non–aggression must be met.Subsequently, this
disagreement goes farther back than many acknowledge. The Korean War, which led up to modern
day confusions, was commonly perceived as a communist attrition war. This very label would, of
course, bring forth America to the fight. America got involved to preserve "order" and prevent
another "Iron Curtain" from forming. America and Russia played huge roles in the skirmish, with
America and Russia both influencing the side aided. North Korea was backed by Russia. With the
Griggs 2help given by Russia, North Korea had huge communist ties. America disliked this and
aided the South Korean people in

The Cultures And Aspects Of The North Korean Culture
Cultures around the world are divide by their distinctive characteristic of people, and how people
interact within their society. Most cultures are driven by the way their environment has been set for
them. Many of cultures have to adapt to the way their environment are due to the conditions that are
set for them and the amount of resources that they are provided. The biggest drive for culture are the
historical custom. Most countries continue to carry their ancestor custom so that the tradition may
stay with them throughout their years, in which making other countries distinctive from one another.
One of the particular country that will be discuss in this report is North Korea. In this report, I will
be discussing the North Korean culture, with describing their living condition in the country,
common issues that they face with on a daily bases, and common threat that they pose on other
countries. North Korea Culture In 1945, during World War II era, North Korea shared the peninsula
of Korea with South Korea. The divided peninsula was heavily influence by United States, United
Nation, and (USSR) Russia. Russia had great influence with the northern peninsula of Korea, while
United States and United Nation held grounds in southern Korea. All three nation took control of the
upper and lower regions after defeating the Japanese armed forces. In web article EveryCulture
2017, states "In 1945, upon the surrender of the Japanese armed forces, Korea was partitioned into
Northern

North Korea Will Meet Its End Is On The Minds Of Many East...
How North Korea will meet its end is on the minds of many East Asian policy makers, analysts,
experts, and military minds. Why is North Korea worth the attention? North Korea is one of the
most heavily armed nations on earth. North Korea possesses a large conventional force of 1.2
million soldiers (Scobell 2007, 8), making her a threat to neighboring South Korea. In addition,
North Korea maintains a large Special Operations Force to operate behind the lines in a major
confrontation with South Korea (Scobell 2007, 8). But it is North Korea's chemical weapons and
missile inventory that pose a threat to not only South Korea but also Japan (Scobell 2007, 9–10) and
island nations in the Pacific. The US is close allies with both Japan and South Korea and North
Korea's advances in unconventional military might are troubling. While it is unlikely North Korea
will attack South Korea in an all out attempt to reunite the peninsula (Scobell 2007, 12), another
possibility exists for North Korea: total collapse of the state as we understand it. The security of
North Korea's weapons of mass destruction will be of paramount importance to the US and the rest
of the world as North Korea maintains a robust WMD program to include nuclear weapons (Scobell
2007, 9–11). North Korea's collapse would require massive resources from the US and South Korea
and other neighboring countries to secure WMD facilities and the population. Since all out war
launched by either US–ROK alliance or North

Nuclear Icb Cons
I found Roy's argument that a North Korean nuclear ICBM would not be a major game changer
convincing because the author has clearly outlined the cost and benefits of four possible policies in
dealing with the North Korean nuclear and missile program. I would add a supporting argument of
nuclear weapons as a "life–insurance" for North Korea to his thesis, before I evaluate the option of
military force as a fifth option to deprive Pyongyang of its nuclear ambitions. In his 2002 State of
the Union address, President George W. Bush named Iran, Iraq and North Korea, as states he
deemed to be part of an "axis of evil." He specifically mentioned those states alleged weapons of
mass destruction programs as a threat to USA. Iraqi weapons of mass

North Korean Crisis Research Paper
The ongoing North Korean Crisis, has, in recent years, escalated as a result of North Korea's
development of nuclear weapons and long–range missiles in violation of UN's Security Council
resolutions. In addition, there were periods of tension such as the shelling of Yeongyeong Island,
and it is possible that any incidents along the border between the two Koreas could potentially result
in dangerous consequences, ultimately leading to war. However, as the Crisis escalates and with
rising tensions, the impacts can already be felt. North Korea currently has defence capabilities such
as chemical and biological weapons, which are frightening on their own, yet even more deadly is the
nuclear weapons North Korea added to their defence arsenal, capable

North Kore A Threat Of World Security Essay
North Korea is a nation where their once family and ally, South Korea, has become their biggest
enemyies. North Korea has taken extensive measures to make sure they are included in some of the
most powerful nations of the modern century. They have done this using the power of nuclear
weapons and other weapons of mass destruction. They have been claimed as a physical and no
longer theoretical threat to its surrounding nations. North Korea has become a threat of world
security and, we should raise arms against North Korea and make them join the NATO in their quest
for world peace and a civilized world, To raise arms against North Korea we would cut off their
supplies which would end the war very quickly and with very little cost., The result of North Korea
surrendering would show the power of the NATO., After the war against North Korea, China would
take over the small country and would use it as a NATO military outpost. (what is supposed to
happen in theory).
Leadership in North Korea
The three dictatorial leaders of North Korea have been Kim II–Sung, Kim Jong Iil, and& Kim Jong
un. Kim Jong il was the leader during WWII and the kKorean war. He died in 2011, which gave his
son Kim Jong– un direct leadership to the throne. Kim Jong un has made life in North Korea easier
for all of his citizens by providing jobs for those who need them most. He has started to gradually
give North Koreans more and more resources to improve their life. Kim Jong un is much better than
his father

Three Approaches To Dealing With North Korea
I personally believe that all three approaches for negotiating with North Korea were inept foreign
policies. As all Bill Clinton's administration did was delay the nuclearizing of North Korea by
exchanging oil. Eventually, North Korea abandoned the agreement with Clinton's administration and
still gained economic aid while making the United States looking foolish. The Bush Administration
had the right idea about seeking a regime change, but underestimated North Koreas government
cohesion and failed to carry it out properly. Of the three approaches, Obama's method for dealing
with North Korea was the most incompetent. For the Obama administration just simply refused to
engage in any negotiations (strategic patience) until North Korea showed ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
As a military invasion would be impossible because of what is known as Mutual Assured
Destruction. Ever since nuclear weapons were invented any nation that has obtained them has never
gone to war with another country that also has weapons of mass destruction. Therefore, the only
solution to the denuclearization of North Korea would be a regime change. For North Korea is the
most sanctioned country in the world and has remained defiant of denuclearization. Any more
sanctions (i.e. Obama's policy) is useless as they will never give into the world's demands.
Consequently, a regime change could occur from the military or a revolution from the peasants. This
could be achieved by using stealth bombers to drop propaganda pamphlets to the North Korean
Populous to incite a revolution. Once a Civil War or Coup de ta is instigated then have the U.S.
provide weapons to the opposing side of the current regime. Even if the Civil War or Coup De ta
fails the war could last several years. As a result, it should destabilize the nation and militarily
weaken it, which would reduce its nuclear arsenal in the

Tension Between The United States And The Cold War
After World War II, only two world superpowers remained: the United States of America and the
Soviet Union. The contradictory political regimes of the democratic United States and the
communist Soviet Union were believed to be mutually exclusive which increased bitterness between
them. Inevitably, the apparent tension between the two superpowers led to the Cold War which
lasted about 45 years. It was war without bloodshed or battle, instead it was a metaphorical war
where the U.S and the Soviet Union increased their weapons and fought for political influence, one
always wanting to excel or maintain within the range of the other. The United States' desperate need
to contain the communist political ideology from spreading any further and meet the Soviet Union's
increased development of nuclear weapons led to the their involvement in the Cold War. The impact
the Cold War had on life during the 1950's and 1960's can be measured through the creation of the
House Un–American ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The democratic ideals of the U.S and the communistic regimen of the USSR competed for nuclear
dominance and international influence. The tension and fear of nuclear war created mass hysteria
within the American population within the 1950's and 1960's that led to the development of the
House Un–American Activities Committee and the procedure of nuclear drills. HUAC was created
to prevent the spread of communism within the United States, and nuclear drills were performed in
schools to help prepare children for nuclear war. To this day, the struggle between communism and
democracy exist as North Korea builds tension with the U.S government through its tenacious
development of nuclear weapons. The fear the Cold War enacted did not end with the fall of the
Soviet Union in 1991. It continues today with North Korea's recklessness, and the terror of one
wrong move ending in nuclear war still

Should The United States Neutralize Wmds?
As many people are very aware, there have been gruesome terrorist actions across many different
nations in recent months. Some of these events include things like the crash of EgyptAir Flight 804
that was suspected to be shot down by a terror group, the bombings in Paris, France and Brussels,
Belgium, as well as the mass shooting in a French political cartoon company. These radical terrorist
groups do not follow any sort of laws, or rules of any kind, giving them free reign over any weapons
they can get their hands on. In the future, these organizations could evolve into using alternative
sources of weaponry. These weapons can and will cause mass destruction and killing in a very short
amount of time. These devices of mass killing are detrimental to higher refined civilizations that do
not support foreign radical beliefs. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The United States's nuclear umbrella should not be withdrawn from foreign countries because of the
risk of more nuclear weapon development. The United States can not keep world peace by
dominating every country's decision on WMDs but the ones that are under nuclear umbrella
protection can be prevented from creating more. A favorable reason the United States should be
allowed to intervene is the country of North Korea. The North Koreans are not afraid of the U.S and
their policies, indicated by North Korea's actions of nuclear missile tests. Republican candidate
Donald Trump, has expressed his extreme dislike for nuclear weapons throughout multiple
interviews. Trump said that the world's enemy is not global warm, but nuclear

Nuclear Arms are Weapons of Mass Destruction
Nuclear arms can easily be classified as weapons of mass destruction, as they destroy all ecosystems
that come in contact with it in a matter of seconds, this fairly new and evolving breed of warfare is
continuously becoming a bigger threat to society due to the fact that; the government can turn to
nuclear power if opposing countries do not comply with their needs. The Cold War was essentially
defined by nuclear weapons and the nuclear arm race between United States and the Soviet Union.
A high degree of anxiety existed between the two superpowers and millions of citizens around the
world were put to risk by nuclear arm race. The use of these nuclear weapons were exceedingly
destructive and the consequences were so enormous that the protection of human rights were
questioned. However the use of these weapons were merely to prevent their use by others. In other
words nuclear weapons were devices of deterrence not warfighting. There was a mutual nuclear
weapon ownership with both states possessing nuclear weapons, therefore the odds of war dropped
quickly. Both superpowers quickly came to the realization that nuclear war between the two
countries could lead to a devastation effect on the world which concluded the cold war. "From 1968
the only universal treaty that stops the spread of nuclear weapons is the Non– Proliferation Treaty
(NPT) with about 130 members. China is a nuclear weapon state but not a party to the treaty. Also
missing are India, Pakistan, Brazil, Argentina

Ben Vajraca. Prof.Robinson. North Korean Nuclear Threat
Ben vajraca
Prof.Robinson
North Korean Nuclear threat Memeo
Since the 1950's North Korea has posed as dangerous threat to The United States and its allies. With
North Korea development of Nuclear arms and its consistent hostile rhetoric and actions towards the
United States. With the North Korea's development of a long range ICBM, more now than ever the
United States has been put into a position where its and many of its allies national security has been
put at risk. We are now put into a position in deciding how to react and move forward with these
development while at the same time mitigating and preventing potential destruction and casualties.
As the advisor to the president my job/goal is to provide the president with advice and ... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
With this these considerations in mind expanding this program would cost heavily as these
programs like Stuxnet can cost hundreds of millions of dollars to develop. Furthermore this type of
program does provide a guarantee of safety as we would not know of its success till an activation of
the missiles and has the possibility of being comprised forcing the U.S to redevelop its program.
The Second option when dealing with this threat would organizing talks among many of the world
powers and countries within East Asia in order to develop a bilateral solution to dealing with Korea.
At this time it is evident the North Korea's biggest ally,China has been distancing themselves either
through heavy sanctions giving the U.S a window of opportunity where China may use its influence
to force change in North Korea, if not to at least working towards other nations to form a
solution.This solution lends to many problematic outcomes with the first being a non–guarantee in
terms of reaching an agreement which looking at previous talks would be highly probable causing
immense setbacks. Additionally agreeing to bilateral talks may put the United States in a position
where heavy comprise may be necessary creating an agreement that does not fulfill our agenda to
the fullest and may create an imagine where the U.S is seen as a subordinate.
The final possible solution to solving this threat

Terrorism Essay
Terrorism is the unlawful use of force against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a
government, the civilian population or any segment thereof, in the furtherance of political or social
objectives". This definition includes three elements: (1) Terrorist activities are illegal and
involve the use of force. (2) The actions are intended to intimidate or coerce. (3) The actions are
committed in support of political or social objectives.
The main topic here is Terrorism and Foreign Policy. The two terms that are going to be discussed is
how the war against terrorism is expanding and how American President George W. Bush misnamed
his National Security Strategy.
In his State of the Union address, President Bush threatened to expand ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Furthermore, if the president attacks North Korea, Iran, or Iraq, he could exacerbate the proliferation
problem rather than reduce it. Other nations would believe that they could be next and think that
working on missiles and weapons of mass destruction was the only way to keep out a superpower
bent on intervening in civil wars everywhere in the name of fighting terrorism.
And would the United States really intervene unilaterally in friendly nations that it believed were
too timid in fighting terrorism–for example, the Philippines or Yemen? In the Philippines, would the
United States intervene against the wishes of a democracy that it helped institute?
A perpetual state of war–as the president seems to envision when he asserted that the war may run
beyond the duration of his term–could undermine economic recovery, does not comport with the
values of a republic, and will likely lead to the erosion of constitutional liberties and the
accumulation of too much power in the executive branch. And a war in perpetuity is not needed to
minimize the threat from North Korea, Iran and Iraq. If the United States could contain the threat
from a rival superpower during the Cold War, it can certainly contain three small, poor countries. In
addition, a seemingly unprovoked war against another Moslem nation, Iran, Iraq or both could act as
a recruiting poster for

The Dangers Of Nuclear Weapons
Since the creation of nuclear weapons, nuclear force has only been used twice. Nuclear bombs were
dropped on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan by the United States, ending World War II. The
destruction, both material and living, produced a sudden realization of the consequences of using
nuclear weapons. Following World War II, states soon realized the potential of and the dangers of
nuclear weapons. With the potential to destroy entire states, people and all, in a matter of seconds,
treaties and agreements were quickly drawn up to prevent the use of nuclear arms. Treaties such as
the Intermediate–Range Nuclear Force Treaty (INF), the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START),
the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty
(CTBT) called for a decrease in the production and a cease in testing of nuclear weapons to prevent
the possibility of nuclear world wars and unnecessary destruction to the environment. When a
nuclear bomb explodes, there are immediate effects from the nuclear blast such as thermal radiation
and several kinds of radiation. Long term effects also occur such as fallout which destroys the
climate and atmosphere of the earth. As such, the United States and Soviet Russia entered a Cold
War once both states obtained nuclear capabilities since neither one would gain anything by using
nuclear force because of mutually assured destruction (MAD). MAD meant that if one state were to
launch a nuclear attack, the immediate

Conflict Between North And South Korea
Conflict in Korea The U.S.'s conflict with North Korea is as old as their leader is short. It all started
in the late 40's and early 50's with the war on Communism. The U.S. feared the rise of Communism
in its neighboring states and the effect it might have on American politics; this phenomenon was
referred to as the Domino Effect. As a result of this fear, the U.S. took action in an attempt to avert
this perceived inevitability. One of the Nations we took action in was Korea; the North was backed
by the Soviets and the South was backed by the U.S.. This country was now torn between two
radically different ideologies; separated by the 38th parallel and a little over 100,000 men. The
Korean War may have ended in 1953, however, we [the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
North vs. South While many people view North and South Korea as one in the same, they are not.
North and South Korea may share a border, but that is all they share; they are dramatically different.
Where North Korea can barely feed their own people, South Korea is a hot spot for technological
development. For example, Hyundai Motor (the world 's fifth biggest car manufacturer), Samsung
Electronics (the world 's biggest technology firm by revenue), and POSCO (one of the worlds
leading manufactures of steel) are some of the few multi–billion dollar companies operating out of
South Korea. While North Korea has committed atrocities against humanity, South Korea has
cultivated an economy that has allowed talented individuals to revolutionize technology. These
claims can be substantiated by taking a look at the GDP of both countries; in 2011, North Korea 's
GDP was estimated at $1,800 per capita whereas South Korea 's was $31,700 per capita. The one
sector of North Korea 's economy that public money is actually funneled into is their military. This
money, which accounts for half of their GDP, is used to develop ICBMs, nuclear warheads, and
other weapons with baleful intent. South Korea may not be a world superpower, but they are miles
and leagues ahead of North Korea. At least, the North understands that weapons of mass destruction
are not toys to be played with by short men with God complexes.

The US Rogue States and the Dialogue with North Korea
Once the Soviet Union collapsed in the early 1990s the bipolar world order disintegrated with it,
leaving the United States as the sole global superpower. Yet, the communism was not the only
concern of Americans. In the early 1980s, this capitalist power already started sensing an
overcoming threat of the international terrorism, which led to the emergence of a new group of
enemies, namely, the rogue states. These countries are seen as a danger to the new unipolar world.
The United States of America assumed a responsibility to contain these states and/or transform them
into successfully functioning democracies. Currently this is being done by military interventions and
sanctions. However, one special state arises – North Korea . It is the ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
However, North Korea receives an absolutely different treatment from other rogue states or the axis
of evil members .
Before delving into the case study of the United States' approach towards the rogue state par
excellence – North Korea, one needs to understand the American aims behind this issue and what
makes it contestable? After the collapse of the Soviet Union the world of duo–polarity and the
perceived threat of communism has disappeared, creating a new world system "with one
superpower and several major powers" (Huntington 36). The emerged order created a new global
threat – international terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. The US, being
the only superpower, saw itself as the democratiser of the world which can prevent the threatening
regimes from spreading. To them this foreign policy was a way of protecting national interests and
expand the community of democratic and capitalist countries that are committed to peace (Lake 46).
Albeit the general goal of democratisation is quite straight–forward, the aims towards every single
rogue state are lacking much uniformity. This happens due to their dissimilar geographical location
and the goals of the "perpetrators" themselves. For example, the majority of the rogue states

Nuclear Weapons During The Cold War
Since the invention of nuclear weapons, they have presented the world with a significant danger,
one that was shown in reality during the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. However, nuclear
weapons have not only served in combat, but they have also played a role in keeping the world
peaceful by the concept of deterrence. The usage of nuclear weapons would lead to mutual
destruction and during the Cold War, nuclear weapons were necessary to maintain international
security, as a means of deterrence. However, by the end of the Cold War, reliance on nuclear
weapons for maintaining peace became increasingly difficult and less effective (Shultz, et. al, 2007).
The development of technology has also provided increasing opportunities for states ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Additionally, it also presents perspectives on important policies and strategies of Iran and North
Korea, in regard to the development of their armory of nuclear weapons.
Since the end of the Cold War, the cases of nuclear proliferation in Iran and North Korea have
gathered enormous international attention. Iran 's nuclear program appeared as a result of the Cold
War alliance between the United States and the late Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. In
2003, Iran was suspected of developing a military nuclear capability and is now developing medium
and intermediate ballistic missiles, which are capable of carrying a nuclear warhead. On the other
hand, North Korea set off a nuclear device and declared suspicions about a military nuclear program
in 2006. Iran and North Korea have recently started cooperation to develop multi–stage ballistic
missiles and have conducted several missile flight tests over the last few years (Schmid, 2008).
With sources dating back to the late 1960s, North Korea's nuclear weapons program has expanded
to be a useful instrument of the government's security. Its principal motivations for developing the
nuclear weapons are as follows: to block foreign pressure, create an international impact and
preserve the terms and conditions of the DPRK (ruling party of North Korea). In contrast, Iran 's
motivations to develop strategic weapons appear to be more complex than that of North Korea. Iran
's efforts to develop nuclear, chemical and

International Law And Nuclear Weapons
Internationally, nuclear weapons have been an important topic of concern and debate for the past
several decades. The concerns and debates within the international community regarding the
proliferation of nuclear weapons to more sovereign states in the post–Cold War era have led to many
international law instruments in attempts to contain these weapons of mass destruction. Treaties
such as the Treaty on the Non–Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and the Test Ban Treaty of 1963,
international organizations such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and the Korean
Peninsula Energy Development Organization (KEDO), along with United Nations Security Council
resolutions and advisory opinions from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) have all played roles
in attempting to contain and reduce nuclear weapons in the international community. However, have
these treaties, advisory opinions, resolutions, and creation of international organizations been
effective in curtailing sovereign states from obtaining and testing nuclear weapons? This paper will
highlight the relationship between specific instruments of International Law pertaining to nuclear
weapons through a case study of North Korea to show that instruments of International Law in
particular, such as the Korean Peninsula Energy Development Agency (KEDO), the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), along with United States and United Nations economic restrictions,
have been ineffective at controlling the

Essay On Usa Vs North Korea
The USA and North Korea are vastly different. For starters, the North Korean people didn't even
have cell phones until five years ago. Did you know how poor/corrupt their economy is, they just
got over a famine that ravaged North Korea for four years, and North Korea has a lot of nuclear
power as well. Even though smart phones have been around for about ten years, the North Korean
people didn't have cell phones until about five years ago. Why is because North Korea's government
is so strict about their country, that you can be arrested for showing video outside of North Korea.
This is because the North Korean people want outsiders to believe that everything in Korea is fine,
and that there a happy place that everyone would like, but in reality, it's a very broken and mislead
country. Besides video, it's also illegal to call someone from ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Most countries now have nuclear power but never use these weapons of mass destruction. As a
result of this, countries hype up their power of nuclear weapons so much, that it forces competing
countries to back down or surrender without actually using nuclear weapons (scare tactics) . Not
only do we know that North Korea has massive nuclear power, but they are actively demonstrating
this power to the world by testing them. So, what we have learned is that North Korea is massively
corrupt. North Korea is also a very poor country as well as a very destructive one. Everything there
is monitored to the point when there is no privacy. It's a big example of a mislead country. They not
only have the nuclear power to cause mass devastation, but are currently testing out nuclear
weapons and aren't scared of causing acts of terrorism. They even use fear tactics on their own
people. Now, compare North Korea to North America and you can see the differences. In
conclusion, be glad that you live in such a privileged

North Korea & Ir The Best Developers Of The Worst Nuclear...
Arshdeep Singh Mrs. Mason English 10 A 24 February 2016 North Korea & Iran in a race to be the
best developers of the worst Nuclear weapons From the 1700 's to the 1900 's, humankind has
gained much knowledge of nuclear energy, all of which started from mere curiosity to understanding
the electrons, protons and neutrons. The knowledge gained over the span of 200 years was so vast
that the humankind has evolved usage of nuclear energy from being beneficial to the humankind to
becoming weapons of mass destruction. It has left the world leaders bewildered as to whether these
advancements in development of nuclear weapons is for welfare of the country or it is to serve
purposes that are far more dangerous than can be encompassed. But the enrichment of nuclear
weapons each year by countries has definitely spurred the scientific community and these actions
have been under scrutiny by the world leaders. In the present day world, out of 196 countries that
exist on this planet, two countries have arisen to be the biggest threats all owing to nuclear weapons.
North Korea and Iran joined this race of exponential development of nuclear weapons and have
posed threats of all sorts to rest of the world with their constant development of nuclear weapons. In
this race, the North Korea has definitely left Iran behind. Therefore, threat of nuclear war with North
Korea is greater than with Iran. These countries have used their capability of nuclear weapons
development to intimidate their foes

Persuasive Essay On Nuclear Weapons
Nuclear weapons are one of, if not the most dangerous weapons in the world today and they are one
of the biggest issues the world faces at this current moment. They have the capability of destroying
entire cities and then some that could result in millions of deaths within seconds. Radiation from the
blasts would kill even more people throughout years to come. They were first used in 1945 at the
end of World War II, when the United States dropped Little Boy and Fat Man in Hiroshima and
Nagasaki to 'save' the lives of American soldiers. Since then, a nuclear arms race was born and it's
becoming more of a concern as time moves forward. Albert Einstein, who was the creator of the
nuclear bomb once said "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World
War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." Countries should not have access to nuclear weapons
because it destroys the environment, there is a possibility of a nuclear war that will end in mass
destruction of the world, and countries could save both revenue and resources. There are many
nuclear bombing tests that happen throughout each year and it's extremely unhealthy for the
environment let alone if a nuclear war happened. According to scientists, even if a small percentage
of the worlds nuclear bombs were set off during a war, it would have an extremely devastating
effect on humanity (Jha). Temperatures would drop quickly because there would be so much black
smoke in the air that the smoke would absorb

The North Korea Nightmare Summary
The general argument made by Harry J. Kazianis in his work , "The North Korea Nightmare", is that
North Korea chose to isolate themselves thinking that is better for their country but in reality it is
not . He writes "there is only one thing that is clear: Tensions on the Korean peninsula are only
going to get worse". In this passage , Kazianis is suggesting that Kim Jong Un is not doing a great
job running his country and is causing his country to become isolated from the other countries . Kim
enjoys flaunting around his new weapons ."Every time Kim tests a new weapons system – or
decides to parade them down the street – the world goes into a panic." This shows that Kim enjoys
the reactions of other countries causing mass destruction and contemplating

The Three Major Types Of Weapons Of Mass Destruction
There are three major types of weapons of mass destruction and those are nuclear weapons,
biological warfare agents, and chemical warfare agents. These weapons share their potential for
large–scale destruction and the indiscriminate nature of their effects, notably against civilians.
WMD's challenges our peace and security here in the United States. There is a strategy for dealing
with weapons of mass destructions, and it is the three pillars, which are counter proliferation,
nonproliferation, and WMD consequence management. The United States has tried to stop other
countries; however, it has gotten to a point that if the United States is attacked with nuclear
weapons, then the U.S. will use WMD as a response to the attack. When it comes to weapons of
mass destruction in the possession of hostile countries and even terrorists, it is one of the greatest
security challenges facing the United States. The first strategy to combat WMD is counter
proliferation to combat WMD use, counter proliferations are fully integrated into the basic
doctrines, in trainings, and even equipping of all forces, since it is important for the U.S military and
appropriate agencies to be prepared to deter and defend against any possible WMD event. With
strengthened nonproliferation to combat WMD proliferation, in order to prevent states from
acquiring WMD and missiles, we must enhance diplomacy, arms control, multilateral agreements,
threat reduction assistance, and export controls. That is to slow and make it more costly to access
sensitive technologies, materials, and expertise. In addition, the laws and treaties that are
consistently violated by Iran for years, are the treaty of the non–profeliration of nuclear weapons,
because they developed a nuclear program that is without the consent of the IAEA. They also has
held into chemical agents and acculturated their chemical stockpile. In the other hand, North Korea
has yet to give up its nuclear weapons, and North Korea has violated the obligations to the IAEA, by
actively developing nuclear weapons. North Korea is likely exchanging nuclear expertise to Iran,
Libya, and Pakistan. It has also sold missiles to Iran. they even have tested their first nuclear
weapon. As we can

The Independence and Isolation of North Korea Essay
North Korea, also referred to as the bridge between Japan and China, is located in the eastern part of
Asia. North Korea is half a pennisula, particularly the northern half, in the Korean Peninsula. North
Korea, is a bit smaller than Mississippi, and about eighty percent of its land it mountainous
(Kummer, 19–20) Signs of human activity date back to 3000 B.C., but Korea was known as Choson.
Historians are not yet sure where the origins of the Korean culture come from but, "..archeologists
have determined that some prehistoric peoples of the Altaic language group probably migrated to
the Korean peninsula from Siberia, Manchuria and Mongolia." (DuBois, 19) Like any other
civilization, the first people fished, gathered food, and hunted. As ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Under Yi Sŏng–Gye's son King Sejong, considered Korea's greatest ruler, inventions like the rain
gauge, the use of a movable type, and the birth of Korean alphabet called Hangeul, still in use today,
surfaced. (Piddock, 27–28) They ruled the entire peninsula for 500 years. Then Korea was annexed
by neighbors Japan in 1910. Korea continued to be under Japan until 1945 when it was liberated at
the end of World War II. ("North Korea", Culturegrams) "With the defeat of Japan in 1945, the
Allies agreed to divide the Korean Peninsula between the Soviet Union and the United States at the
thirty–eighth parallel as a temporary measure." (Piddock, 30) The Soviet Union received the
Northern part of Korea, and the United States the South. ".. Soviet forces closed off northern Korea
at the thirty–eighth parallel and placed Korean communists in power there." Evidently, North Korea
was bound to turn communist. Kim Ill–sung took power of North Korea in 1948, and two years later
the Korean War commenced. (Piddock, 31–32) "on June 25 [1950], soldiers from communist North
Korea (known as the North Koreans People's Army, or NKPA) had launched an invasion of their
noncommunist neighbor, South Korea. South Korean troops(known as Republic of Korea, or ROK,
forces) were surprised, outnumbered, and outgunned by the invaders. .. In the

North Korea's Nuclear Program

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Erica Spivey

More from Erica Spivey (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

North Korea's Nuclear Program