Rhetorical Analysis Of Military Industrial Complex Speech

Rhetorical Analysis Of Military Industrial Complex Speech
During the Cold War, there were enough nuclear weapons produced to destroy the whole world
several times over. The "Military–Industrial Complex" speech delivered by President Dwight D.
Eisenhower in his farewell address in 1961 touched on his views on the massive arsenal production.
President Eisenhower used parallelism, allusion, and tone to warn the American people of the
dangers of producing excessive military weapons. To stress the need of maintaining balance in
national programs, Eisenhower used parallelism. In section 3 paragraph 4, he reiterates the words
'balance between.' "Balance between the private and public economy, balance between cost and
hoped for advantage––balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable..." By
repeating those two words, he is gaining the attention of the American audience and drilling the
concept into their heads. At a time of paranoia and overall fear, the people are being ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
He addresses topics in a serious manner in an attempt to warn citizens of the possible unfortunate
events that will occur without action taken. In section 3 paragraph 1, he touched on how America's
failure to maintain peace would be detrimental. "Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of
comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both home and abroad."
His use of the word 'our' makes the audience believe he is apart of the people and convinces them to
think higher of his character. He continues to warn his fellow citizens of the negative outcomes of
the military–industrial complex in section 4 paragraph 5. "The potential for the disastrous rise of
misplaced power exists and will persist." The solemn words used are an effective way to reach out
to his audience. By mentioning the harsh effects America can endure, people know the subject area
is one to be concerned
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Modern World 's Highest Incarceration Rate
The United States often describes itself as a noble power, often placing itself and other countries as
protectors of the modern world, and an international force. A major issue arises in this model theory
when a certain statistic is mentioned, and that is the fact that the U.S. only has 4.4 percent of the
total world population, but accounts for 22 percent of the world's prisoners (Tsai, "U.S. Has World's
Highest Incarceration Rate"). The self–proclaimed U.S. model, actually consists of injustice and
inequality, and a diversion from true rehabilitation and fair punishment, that is all distracted by the
prison industrial complex, politics, and profits. This mass incarceration, and the "prison–industrial
complex" causes the U.S. to ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The mass incarceration of part of the U.S population is propelled mainly by the practices of
politicians with regards to business. This is justified as legal by politicians stating they are trying to
do what is best for the people by being "tough on crime". By making the statement that they are
being tough on crime, politicians typically earn public support while supporting private companies
in terms of detention. Another justification that is used is the statement of leading the war on drugs
by creating harsh punishments for drug offenders. One fact that shows how irrational harsh
punishment for everyone is that only 10 percent percent of federal drug offenders are classified as
high–level offenders, but all face the same harsh minimum punishments (Battaglia, drugpolicy.org).
The problem with this policy is that most drug offenders are nonviolent, and end up getting sucked
into a cycle of violent behavior due to the long terms they are being forced to serve due to laws. By
shifting towards private contracting the focus is truly on profits, so corners are cut and the focus on
rehabilitation is lost, punishing both the imprisoned and the public which could be benefitting from
individuals saved through the justice

Summary: The Military Industrial Complex
Fallows describes the impact of the military–industrial complex has to be detrimental in its
economic and political influence just as Eisenhower warned in his speech." The economic problem
is that the federal government no longer has enough money to throw around without a plan. The
political problem is the distortion of the process of public choice." (Fallows, 2009, para 8). The
military industrial complex encourages the option of war. War can be profitable with the promise of
wealth, land etc. On the other hand, war can be damaging to a country's economy and its
environment. There are risks of an enormous amount of civilian and military casualties. The United
States has been quick to go to war in my opinion. It appears the American soldiers ... Show more
It has brought about increase in jobs in the defense industries and in defense–related production in
mining, agriculture, construction, and services. Workers in this field make up a significant amount
of the total labor force. The development of industries and private organizations as a result of the
military–industrial complex created a huge array of job opportunities for people. There was also a
flow of military personnel into private military contractors. The military industrial complex seemed
to have an influence on the number of people recruited into the defense

Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Gilded Age
Question 2
From the end of the nineteenth century to the middle of the twentieth century many economic
changes occurred, from booms to busts, but all effected minorities less favorably.
At the end of the nineteenth century began an era of industrialization that created an economic
upturn called the gilded age. Hallmarks of this age were technological advances, banking
innovations, and wealth concentrations. Railroad construction, advances in steel production, and
electrical innovation drove industrial and economic growth. Emerging from this upheaval were a
gaggle of industrial big wigs: John D. Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, and Andrew Carnegie. These three
represented an unholy alliance with government and big business that left smaller ... Show more
Ford Motor company not only revolutionized production with the assembly line, but also paid its
workers well enough that they could afford to buy its cars too. This boom in car ownership
encouraged other industries to grow as well, sectors such as road and bridge construction, glass and
leather manufacturing, and naturally, oil production expanded also. Advertising built brand
identification and created a consumer culture that equated patriotism, and piety with consumerism.
For the first time, companies like Coca Cola, and General Electric sold hope and lifestyle,
encouraging the creation of a consumer culture. Unfortunately this "roaring twenties" boom
economy lead many to lean too heavily on credit, leading to an inevitable down cycle called the
Great Depression.
Structural defects in the US economy, such as banking sector instability, wage stagnation,
agricultural overproduction, and over reliance on credit, were the main causes of the Great
Depression. Newly elected Herbert Hoover and his administration floundered as unemployment and
hunger raged out of control. So many lost their homes that card board shanties called "Hoovervilles"
sprung up in all major cities. American 's disillusionment with governmental ineffectiveness during
Hoover 's administration allowed the Democratic Party to elect the first democratic president since
Woodrow Wilson(1921). Franklin Delano Roosevelt(FDR) swept into power ready to

Summary: The Military Industrial Complex
The military industrial complex was a term coined by President Eisenhower describing the growing
relationship between the military and the government, mostly regarding the massive increase in
military spending. Since the Cold War, the United States has continually expanded military
spending, particularly the Department of Defense, which is currently 21 times more expensive than
the State Department. The most common effect this has on members of Congress is the pressure that
is put on them to appropriate funds for the DOD in the best way possible. The consequences of not
being able appropriate the proper funds could result in job loss missed economic opportunities and
ultimately not being reelected. Congress deals with funding projects such as the expensive F–35
which has yet to be made. Lockheed and Martin, the F–35s designers, applied a method called
political engineering in order to get bipartisan support. This method includes using the 133,000 jobs
across 45 states as leverage in order for state politicians to continue their support. Another deal
congress has had to deal with is the Base Realignment and Closing Commissions (BRACs) which
essentially ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Currently, the United States spends about 1 percent of its current budget in 150 countries on what is
considered soft power. Soft power is made up expanding markets, providing humanitarian
assistance, importing goods and strengthening global prosperity. Despite only accounting for 1
percent of the Budget, several studies have shown up to 45% of people believe foreign aid is the
United States most expensive category of the Federal Budget. On the flip side, spending on DOD
has remained around roughly 20% for the last 10 years. The United States can't afford to continue to
police the world and continue to trade with fast–growing nations while the DOD is taking 20% of
our annual

The World War II And The Cold War
The term "military complex" was made popular by Eisenhower who was the president from 1953 to
1961. The term refers to the marriage of military institutions with economic institutions for the
reason of securing the nation However, the structure of the intertwined military, government and
civilian was started earlier in the century from about 1915. There were many trial and errors to get
the ball rolling on such an impacting and controversial issue. Many boundaries had to be overcome
for there to function among these industries with the common ground of providing for the nation
while at war. Although war's affect may touch upon many aspects of life not only in America but
any nation at war, blurred lines take the place of division between ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
So it is common for the height of the industrial military complex to be focused on the Cold War and
World War II. Yet, the beginning years is when important changes took place and forever changed
the infrastructure of government regarding military and industry.
Due to the massive spending dedicated to weapons and warfare, biological and traditional there is
even more of vague divergence between the organizations. How this blending came to be regarding
commerce and military started around 1917. The first time the United States had to use its economy
to prepare for war was for World War I. Production was not only needed for the war but also, to put
the economy at full capacity. Therefore the civilian industry had to be enlisted in the production of
supplies for the military. A network was created between federal government, military services and
industry. Commerce coupled with this new network laid the groundwork for the complex
Eisenhower later described in 1961. At these beginning stages, however, there was a disarray of
order to accomplish supplying the military with what it demanded. The lack of power to command
organization needed to adhere industry with government was owed to the different schools of
thought concerning the government's role in commerce. On one hand it was thought that the
government should stay out of the

Sowing Weapons Of War Essay
Weapons often seem as a necessity when it comes to defense, whether it be self defense or the
defense of peace and freedom. In the United States' war with Iraq, there have been a reported one
hundred sixty–five thousand Iraqi civilians were killed between 2003 and 2015. All too often,
civilians find themselves victim to war violence.
In 1995, The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops issued an article written by the National
Conference of Bishops titled Sowing Weapons of War: A Pastoral Reflection on the Arms Trade and
Landmines. The article explores the issues and effects of war weapons. The National conference of
bishops refers to the arms trade as a scandal and is greatly condemned because the purchasing and
selling these weapons ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The issues regarding the arms trade discussed in Sowing Weapons of War include the free market in
arms, moral responsibility, policies for curbing the trade, and the banning of landmines. Regarding
the free market in arms, the Unites States' activity in the trade has increased dramatically since the
Cold War and this increase has led to an increase in lives lost in third world countries due to
violence. As a supplier of war weapons, the United States has a moral responsibility to ensure that
they follow the process for a legitimate trade. The trade is legitimate if it promotes legitimate
defense or follows the principle of sufficiency. However, even though there are instances where the
trade can be justified, measures should be taken to curb the trade. Strict controls in the United States
as well as internationally can curb the trade; as well as finding nonmilitary ways to protect jobs.
Landmines claim the lives of civilians every week; measures need to be take internationally to
reduce the number of landmines hidden across the world. In conclusion, weapons of war take the
lives of several people everyday, but it does not have to remain this way as there are many steps that
the country and the world can take to put an end to the illegitimate

An Interpretation Of The Fourteenth Amendment
The 13th
*Provides us with an interpretation of the 13th amendment. –13th amendment basically abolished
slavery
*Conveys to us what the Prison Industrial Complex is –"is a term used to describe the overlapping
interests of government and industry that use surveillance, policing and imprisonment as solutions
to economic, social and political problems" (http://www.prisonabolition.org/what–is–the–prison–
industrial–complex/)
*Throughout the film DuVernay maps the journey of African Americans as they endured slavery,
segregation, then integration, and finally societal oppression; how they went from slavery to mass
incarceration.
She uses the aesthetics of sound, and lighting which are important contributors to the themes of
bondage and inequality. Slavery was our country's old economic system, therefore, when he 13th
amendment freed these people, how were they supposed to rebuild their economy. People who are
locked up in prison often provide the system with an extremely cheap source of labor. Furthermore,
those in prison are suavely people who come from poor or low income families. Yet, they are
charged high rates when talking to family members in prison. In some places, one must work and
hour and a half making minimum wage in order to have a simple 10 minute phone call with
someone in prison. Additionally, politicians throughout the 80's and 90's played a crucial role in the
development of the system which exists today. Richard Nixon's "war on drugs" is when we began

The Human Trafficking Aspect Of The Military Industrial...
Furthermore, a report by Reuters in 2013 found that nothing has changed as staffers are routinely
pressured to falsify figures to cover for any missing funds. Meanwhile, the Pentagon has received
$8.5 trillion since 1996, the first year in which all government agencies were required to submit to
audits. Yet, none of that money has been audited by an independent party, thereby making the
Pentagon the only federal government agency that has refused to allow outside audits! To sum up,
it's difficult to find more incontrovertible evidence to show the galling lack of accountability for the
military industrial complex, but the human trafficking aspect may just do so.
During that same House Committee hearing, Rep. McKinney also confronted Rumsfeld questioning
why Dyncorp has continued to receive contracts even though the company had been involved with
human trafficking. In short, DynCorp is an exceedingly politically–connected corporation with
executives and board members who served in the Reagan and Clinton administrations. Nonetheless,
in response to McKinney's question, Rumsfeld answered, "I'm advised...that it was not the
corporation that was engaged in the activities you characterized, but I'm told it was an employee of
the corporation and it was some years ago in the Balkans that that took place." To clarify, the
corporation's executives weren't involved with trafficking, but they decided to figuratively kill the
messenger once they were made aware of the heinous actions

Prison Industrial Complex ( Pic )
Prison Industrial Complex (PIC) is a term we use to depict the interests of government and industry
that utilization observation, policing, and detainment as answers for what may be, in fact, monetary,
social, and political "issues. Through its range and effect, the jail modern complex secures the
power of individuals who get their energy through racial, monetary and other auxiliary benefits by
shielding current power conveyances. It benefits government and industry, and in addition those
people who as of now hold control in our general public. There are six segments I trust add to the
PIC. The segments are criminalization, media, reconnaissance, policing, court framework, and the
detainment facilities. Criminalization is the procedure through which certain activities get to be
distinctly unlawful. Activities get to be wrongdoings simply after they have been socially or
lawfully characterized all things considered through procedures, for example, enactment, court
decisions, or institutional approaches. Thoughts regarding what is "criminal" reach out a long ways
past particular activities, be that as it may. Criminalization is additionally what happens when whole
gatherings of individuals, or of social conditions (the destitute, youth, eccentric individuals), are
focused by law requirement for reconnaissance, discipline and control. The criminalization of
vagrancy, for instance, incorporates the control of vagrants through laws that make everything from
open pee to resting

Elite Power In Mass Media
The power elites have a striking influence in mass media and what type of information is given to
the public. The term power elite was coined by C. Mills as the authority in society. Studies have
shown the flow of bias information from elites to the masses and how these messages influence
them. This flow of influence not only has been seen in past history but we still are seeing it today in
our so called MacDonaldized society. Therefore, individuals should take caution when interpreting
media, specifically media related to politics and our society.
Mills defines manipulation as individuals not realizing they are being controlled. Therefore, they
believe they are acting on free will. Where he defines coercion–being as one being forced to do
something they may not want to do. To give a better understanding of elite power and their use of
manipulation and coercion, one must look into what Mills described as the 3 levels of society. The
first being the elite authority, which has the most power in the society. Usually composed of men of
similar origin, education, career and style of life. The Second is the Middle level of power elite
which is thought of as Congress, parties, and conflict. interest groups (however their decisions
ultimately rely on the power elite). The last level is the masses, which compose of individuals such
as ourselves. The power elites work through the middle level to manipulate this level of society.
This manipulation is done by conglomerates, the high

Eisenhower's Last Speech Summary
Eisenhower's last speech was based on telling America the risks of moving forward with the military
industrial complex. The military industrial complex is an agreement which allows private companies
to produce and sell weapons to the U.S. government. Eisenhower talks about how he was worried
about spending too much money on the weapons from private companies since he came into office.
Eisenhower is weary about the sudden increase of the military industry and thinks that it could help
America but at the same time could harm them. He thinks it could be dangerous to quickly become
reliable on the new technology and advancements in war industry and spend too much money on
these items. In the end, Eisenhower wishes well to the authorities coming

The Arms Trade Treaty ( Att )
It was in the year 2009 when the UN General Assembly approved to assume negotiations to
establish the world's first international Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). Its purpose was to create a
spectrum of international standards to use in governing the global arms trade. Since its initial
implementation, there has been an influx of countries' pledges towards the treaty. However, many
major arms producing and importing countries have refused to sign the document. This has become
a major basis of debate because without regulation of any sort these countries limiting any chance
for peace in major conflict areas. The arms trade treaty needs to be effectively implemented in the
modern arms industry due to the many obscene violations before its ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
For instance, Anup Shah studied that after the 1991 Persian Gulf crisis, the United States agreed to
sell 80 advanced F16s to the United Arab Emirates. In return, the US was to be able to build military
bases there with access to the only deep–water port capable of storing carriers in the Persian Gulf.
Companies and governments export arms to many regions around the world; however, these places
sometimes include war torn countries and brutal regimes. It was in the year 2000 "that U.S.
contracts accounted for 49.7% of global sales ... and the U.S. controlled half of the developing
world 's arms market with $12.6 billion in sales." (Stanton, Madsen) Companies end up selling to
these areas of the world because "in order to make up for a lack of sales from domestic and
traditional markets for military equipment, newer markets are being created or sought after." (Shah,
The Arms Trade is Big Business) To rid the industry of high rates of corruption and to stop
companies from making secret deals with governments, the ATT needs to be better enforced
amongst the world's arms

Private Military Contractors In Vietnam War
In his 1960 Farewell Address, former President Dwight D. Eisenhower brought attention to the
"military–industrial complex", a term that is used to describe how the government uses private
industry to meet its various demands during war or peace. Since World War I and World War II, the
United States has witnessed a greater connection between the public and private sectors as private
industry pumped out the goods to keep the government and country going. Similarly, there were
changes on the battlefield as now private contractors became common sights. Eventually, the
government would call on private contractors to provide aid on the military battlefield and even
fight in some instances. The use of non–governmental workers on the battlefield ... Show more
At the height of the war in 2007, there were about 190,000 armed and unarmed contractors
compared to 160,000 US troops. During the war, these contractors served various purposes such as
logistical support and the security of convoys and bases. Moreover, " about 199,783 contractors
were employed by the US in Iraq and Afghanistan in fiscal year 2010", which truly demonstrates
how far the contracting business has come in the United States in less than a

Military Industrial Complex in Vietnam
On 26 July 1950, President Harry Truman approved a multi–million dollar military assistance
package designed to help the French defeat a strong communist movement in French Indochina. The
package included $15 million worth of military equipment and a small number of American military
advisors assigned to supervise the flow of tanks, plans, artillery, and other equipment.1 By 1954, the
United States government had provided 80% of the war supplies used by the French in Indochina
which equated to about $3 billion.2 This marked the beginning of the United States involvement in
Southeast Asia and the expansion of the military–industrial complex in America. This paper will
explore the role the American military–industrial complex played as part ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
But much of this fear was driven by American newspapers. In 1951, Charles E. Wilson praised the
American Newspaper Publishers Association for basically convincing the free world that they were
in constant danger. Wilson also told the group that because of this perceived danger, Congress was
now able to budget vast sums of money to avert it.10 At the advent of the 1960s, Eisenhower's
definition of the military–industrial complex had fundamentally been altered by President John F.
Kennedy. Kennedy, along with Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, consolidated the military
industry process and set up controls similar to that of a major corporation.11 As Commander–in–
Chief, Kennedy resisted pressure from senior military advisors to send additional troops into
Vietnam. Kennedy's desire was to have all troops out of Southeast Asia by 1965.12 These beliefs
were reinforced by the failures of the Bay of Pigs operation in 1961 and the Cuban Missile Crisis in
1962. Kennedy had no desire to escalate the Cold War which was contrary to what the Joint Chiefs
of Staff and the Central Intelligence Agency wanted. By refusing to go to war, Kennedy was also
reducing the possibility of greater profits for many defense contractors. Despite the Warren
Commission's conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone in assassinating Kennedy, the
speculation that the CIA or members of the military–industrial complex were somehow

Why Did Dwight D. Eisenhower Use The Military Industrial...
On January 17, 1961 President Dwight D. Eisenhower delivered his farewell address to the nation,
his final public speech as President of the United States. As such it was his last opportunity to
address the nation, on any subject of his choice, with the authority, prestige and preeminence that
comes with the office of President of the United States. His choice, what he termed the Military
Industrial Complex, was perhaps something that at the time did not register in the mind of the
average American as a priority when placed along the topics of the Communism, the Cold War and
nuclear war. Yet, as it turns out the issue regarding the Military Industrial Complex and
Eisenhower's warnings about it have outlasted the fears of the mid 20th century. ... Show more
This partnership inherently erodes the safeguards and checks intended to exist over each group by
placing the key to the well being of one party in the hands of the other eliminating any incentive to
perform each party's duty in favor of self preservation. As it plays out, the arms industry places its
manufacturing centers in key congressional districts such that they ensure congressional approval
and contracts by playing on the limitation of the democratic system. Because each representative in
these districts has to be reelected to office, each election cycle produces the possibility of being
voted out of office. One essential component in a reelection bid is to ensure the economic prosperity
of the electorate, therefore if a congressmen were to limit, reduce or in any way infringe on the arms
industry they would risk the economic sufficiency of their electorate and with it diminish their
possibility of reelection. Thus, a mutual benefit between Congress and the arms industry

Eisenhower And The Military Industrial Complex Essay
2) Eisenhower and the Military Industrial Complex (2:30)
a) Quote: "Until the latest of our world conflicts [meaning WWII] the United States had no..."
Finish the quote.
President Eisenhower states "Until the latest of our world conflicts [meaning WWII] the
United States had no armaments industry."
b) How many millions of men and women at the time were directly engaged in the "defense
establishment"?
Three and a half million men and women were directly engaged in the defense establishment.
c) Eisenhower said the councils of government need to guard against what, sought or unsought?
Eisenhower said "the councils of government must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted
influence whether sought or unsought by the military industrial conflicts."
d) Why? What could be "endangered"? The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power
exists and will persist, and we may never let this endanger our liberties or democratic processes.
e) "Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can..." what? "Only an alert and knowledgeable
citizen can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense,
with our peaceful methods and goals." (FYI. More on military industrial complex in history.
Recommended!)
Presidents on the "domino theory" (primary media doc, presidents talking): (FYI, "Berlin Wall",
(FYI, Kennedy, http://www.history.com/topics/cold–war/cold–war–history/videos#jfk–a–new–
generation)
3) Cold War in Middle

Essay about Mass Incarceration of African Americans
"Until justice is blind to color, until education is unaware of race, until opportunity is unconcerned
with the color of men's skins, emancipation will be a proclamation but not a fact."(Lyndon Johnson).
For generations in the United Stated, ethnic minorities have been discriminated against and denied
fair opportunity and equal rights. In the beginning there was slavery, and thereafter came an era of
racism which directly impacted millions of minorities lives. This period called Jim Crow was the
name of the racial caste system up in till mid 1960s. Jim Crow was more than just a series of severe
anti–Black laws, it became a way of life. Under Jim Crow, African Americans were positioned to
the status of second class citizens. What Jim Crow ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Just like race is a social construct and exists only in our minds, with no biological evidence, so is the
assumption that most prisoners convicted of drug offense are African Americans. It is a myth that
we as a nation have moved beyond race, Racial caste is alive and well in America. Alexander, author
of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, explained how our
treatment of criminals has created a new racial caste system, and the only way to make change is by
massive social change and Civil Rights movement. The criminal laws often focus on psychoactive
drugs used by the minority populations. Minorities are disproportionately targeted, arrested, and
punished for drug offenses. For instance, Black, Latino, Native American, and many Asian were
portrayed as violent, traffickers of drugs and a danger to society. Surveillance was focused on
communities of color, also immigrants, the unemployed, the undereducated, and the homeless, who
continue to be the main targets of law enforcement efforts to fight the war on drugs. Although
African Americans comprise only 12.2 percent of the population and 13 percent of drug users, they
make up 38 percent of those arrested for drug offenses and 59 percent of those convicted of drug
offenses causing critics to call the war on drugs the "New Jim Crow"(drug policy). The drug

The Military-Industrial Complex
Being a young citizen of America gives one a limited view on the conflict in the Middle East. One
should do their best to learn so they may gather all information and have an educated opinion. This
applies to the war we started in Iran and the continuing 'fight against terrorism'. All this fighting has
bled into Syria, and American intervention in Syria, such as bombings and the search for/fight for
oil, have created more of a problem in the middle east post 9/11. It's has caused not only terrorist
groups to become more active, but the overall hatred for americans in syria has skyrocketed since
we invaded Iran shortly after 9/11.
Before we delve into the complex web of causes and effects for the war on terrorism, what is
terrorism. As defined ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This Invasion started with stealth planes dropping "Precision bombs". They were not really
precision bombs because in the documentary Why we fight it said out of the bombs dropped in the
first six months none of them hit their intended target. These bombs instead came down on civilians.
The US claims we are there to free them, but are we really? If we want to save them from
destruction why are we destroying them ourselves? As the death toll rises anger swells to the surface
and that anger is turned into Anti–American terrorist groups. The Anti–American movement sweeps
over the country and our solution is to drop more bombs. " The United States, the United Kingdom,
France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar began flying in fighters, weapons and equipment to turn the
Syrian Spring into a bloody civil war. Once they had overthrown the government of Libya, at the
cost of 25,000 to 50,000 lives, they began adapting the same strategy to Syria, despite knowing full
well that this would be a much more drawn–out, destructive and bloody war" (Davies). We feel the
need to spread our culture to other countries in a wicked form of imperialism. We say 'we want to
bring them freedom, save them with democracy.'; Although, are we really saving them? Their
governments run just fine, our interventions are for our gain. We have certain beliefs, but that does
not mean we must force them upon countries we see as

Prison Industrial Complex And Its Interrelationships
Name Course Institution Tutor Date Urban anthropology Question 1: In Maskovsky and
Cunningham (2009), there is a relationship which exists between the politics of surveillance, the rise
of the prison complex and their interrelationships. The Bush administration was not formulated on
the basis of unifying the homeland security but it was intended to create a fragmentation in the
system which has unequal measures of the risks and security protocols which are followed. The
prison industrial complex in this system was designed in order to eliminate people who are
considered to be high profile criminals from the society. A lot of funds have been allocated to this
system which depended entirely on policing strategies and surveillance improvements in order to
help reduce the activities of terrorists. This massive investment in this sector led to the changes in
the administration and the urban fears increased as a result of increased surveillance. The connection
between urban fears, the politics of security and surveillance and the rise of prison industrial
complex is based on the changes which took place in the bush administration. According to parenti
(2000) the relationship between urban fears, the rise of the prison industrial complex and the politics
of surveillance and security are interrelated in different ways. The ways in which they are
interrelated is caused by the overlapping nature of the American cities. In order to make the
overlapping nature of the American

Tropic Of Chaos Summary
Right now, there are over thirty countries around the world developing drone technologies. Like all
arms races, once a weapon is developed, there is no 'turning–back.' For instance, once the atomic
bomb was created, other nations franticly sought to create their own earth–scorching nuclear
weapons. Today, the same is true with regards to drones and, more recently, autonomous battlefield
robots: the US may have been the first nation to deploy such weapons in combat, but it won't be the
last. In addition, the deployment of these weapons has a long history. For example, returning to the
work of Pete Singer:
"The first predator drones were used in 1995 during the Balkan conflicts in Bosnia and Kosovo. By
2000, the Air Force was developing ways ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Here, I've only explored a few dynamics of militarism. Equally important would be an examination
of how patriarchy and culture play a role in militarizing individuals, societies, cultures, etc. For now,
the most important thing to recognize is the fact that almost every nation around the world is
militarizing at a rapid pace, pouring vast sums of money into military training, technologies and
weapons. Of course, this is great news for the weapons industry, but bad news for humanity.
Furthermore, the weapons industry and governments around the world are currently developing the
most high–tech military weapons imaginable, with a particular focus on unmanned battlefield robots
and, increasingly, autonomous battlefield weapons. Moreover, all of these trends take place within
the context of climate change, adding another source of violence and

Military Industrial Complex ( Mic )
Paige Hagen
AMST 2011
David Karjanen
3 November 2015
Military Industrial Complex Dwight D. Eisenhower coined the term Military Industrial Complex
(MIC). With the expansion of the war efforts throughout the country and seeing it firsthand as a
general in World War II, he realized how powerful the military was becoming in the United States.
In his farewell speech to the public, Eisenhower warned that this great complex that has been
created carries great implications, and that though it may be necessary, the nation must be careful
not to let it get out of control and have power misplaced. The Military Industrial Complex is the
interweaving of the military with industries and corporations, and after the 9/11 attacks it greatly
influenced the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The B–2 Bomber for example, having parts made in all 50 states, is a strategic move. Nobody is
going to stop the production of that plane; no congressman/woman is going to allow that. Simple
positions that were originally held by people in the service sector, such as peeling potatoes and
doing laundry, are now handled by contractors. For every soldier out fighting with a gun, there are
hundreds of people working to provide equipment. To the people of Congress, defense spending
equals jobs, and that is how Congress gets woven in with the industries as well in the MIC. In
addition to Congress are think tanks; people that work in research to connect education with
political action. They work to provide information to help back up certain policies. The revolving
door effect comes into play here because many members of the Military Industrial Complex have
been or will be part of another branch. These cycles of people spread their knowledge and ideas
throughout the entire MIC and therefore keep the "correct" ideas flowing. There have been efforts
made to glorify the military as well. After the Vietnam War, the pentagon began to strategize how to
control the correspondent's access to the fighting on the fields and hide what is really going on. This
was thought of as necessary to maintain national support in future conflicts. Fast forward nearly
three decades and you will see that the Pentagon spent $1.2 billion on advertising intended to

Wages of Crime by R. T Naylor
Introduction:
Wages of Crime: Black Markets, Illegal Finance, and the Underworld Economy is a book by R. T.
Naylor based on his views of organized crime and the government's stance and involvement. Naylor
writes from a mostly democratic point of view and presents his thesis quite clearly. Naylor's thesis
in this book is that organized crime is a convenient myth handed to society by the government. In
this book Naylor sets up four important concepts: first on the black market operations of guerrilla
groups, second on the modern arms market, then on money laundering, and finally the underworld
trade in gold. Throughout the book he talks about the critique of the public perceptions of organized
crime, a discussion of anti–money laundering policies, and an analysis of terrorist financing.
Summery
At the start of his second chapter Naylor sets up the difference between the motives of insurgent
groups versus criminal groups. Naylor claims "Criminals commit economic crimes to make money."
(pg. 45) and that is where motivation ends for them. The difference between insurgent groups is,
"money is merely a tool –one that is necessary but not sufficient to achieve. Like the formally
constituted governments they challenge, insurgent groups have political programs...they have
control over armed forces, and they directly compete with the state for territory, population, and
resources." (pg. 45) A parallel economy is then created by the guerrilla groups to supply the
population with what

Example Of Corporate Social Responsibility
"We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by
the military–industrial complex" (Eisenhower). This was Eisenhower's warning against the military–
industrial complex in his farewell address as president. Even so, our military and government have
gotten out of control with the amount of money the goes to defense spending every year. This is
precisely why our government needs to adopt some form of corporate social responsibility to, at
some level, be able to regulate themselves. There are just too many examples of wasteful spending
spawning from bad policies and dependency to ignore the source of the problem any longer. The
U.S. defense budget is out of control, crucial to our economy, and too ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
That's how Eau Claire, Wisconsin, the ninth largest city in Wisconsin, got their hands on a military
grade armored personnel carrier (Boyd). Why is our defense spending debate only about arming
soldiers? Why doesn't it includes the food chain of contractors selling arms to the military, who
eBayed them to law enforcement? Or what about the way defense spending helps determine whether
you have a job.
Lots of parts of defense spending are domestic spending. Defense spending creates American
manufacturing jobs. Going back to the tanks from before, there is one set of workers at one factory
in Lima, Ohio who can make those tanks and they are the only people who can. If they get laid off
we lose are tank building infrastructure and we give an American town the rust belt treatment. And
there is a similar situation with the Bradly Fighting Vehicle manufactured in York, Pennsylvania and
only York, Pennsylvania. What happens in Lima and York happens all over the country every time
America gives itself defense jobs. The biggest example being the F–35 Lightning II Joint Strike
Fighter.
The Air Force pitched the F–35 to Congress as something the defense company Lockheed Martin
would build. Lockheed promised Congress that the F–35 would create 125,000 American jobs
across 46 states (Lockheed Martin). So permission to build it zipped through Congress because
projects that boost 96% of the U.S. economy tend to do well in a Senate vote. The F–35 will also be
the

Military Industrial Complex Essay
Position on Military Industrial Complex Catalina M. Young Archbishop Edward A. McCarthy
Abstract The "Military Industrial Complex" is a term coined by former President Dwight D.
Eisenhower. This refers to the relationship between the nation's armed forces and the industries that
support them. Though its name came about in the 1960s, this relationship between armed forces and
private industry dates back centuries. Recent legislation has been passed to help limit the power that
this relationship has over defense spending. For any country, military spending is a big part of the
national budget. Over time this business transaction has formed into a relationship between the
nation's armed forces and these private defense industries. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
At that point in time, arms were still being manufactured and shipped over from Britain. Hamilton
not only saw this as a more economical way to obtain arms, but also as a way to cut ties with foreign
arms producers, which he thought was key to national security. This seemingly small proposal at the
time, lead to the eventual production of arms on American soil. From this point onward the
country's defense and economy were intertwined. As the need for more weapons grew, the process
of making them transformed from a single person hand crafting a gun, to an assembly line of people
each trained to build a separate part of a gun. In 1808 a policy for arming the United States' militia
called for more guns to be made. This act supplied the militia with $200,000 in arms and military
equipment annually.(Encyclopedia of the New American Nation, 2013) Pretty soon thereafter
national arms systems were set upon the national armories. A network of reliable arms
manufacturers emerged. Contracts were drawn up between these armories and private
manufacturers, who were more likely to test new means and materials to improve guns. This was
key to an ideal system of arms production. This was the beginning of the military industrial
complex. It was here that the desire for an innovative military arms snowballed into the high–tech
industry that it is today. "In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of
unwarranted influence, whether sought or

Military Industrial Complex
The meaning of the "term military–industrial complex" MIC is not quite clear for the most of
military and civilians, even though they often read about in newspapers or hear from politicians. The
term military–industrial complex did not exist in the past, it has appeared recently. The first use of
this term was on January 17, 1961, when President Dwight D. Eisenhower addressed his farewell to
the nation . After more than two decades on the launch of this term ,R. Buckminster Fuller revisited
Eisenhower's address in his book "A Grunch of Giants" to find out the extent of the influence of the
owners of military industries, . Not only R. Buckminster Fuller who addressed what president
Eisenhower said about the military–industrial complex , but ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Bacevich published an article which is titled " The tyranny of Defense Inc." He said in this article
the expenditures which spent on defense budget are more than which spent on building schools. For
instance " We pay for a single destroyer with new homes that could have housed more than 8000
people", Bacevich Said. Furthermore, The Pentagon's budget has more doubled in the past decades,
to some $700 billion per year.
Fifty years later, James Jay Carafano wrote " Five Steps to Save America's Defense Industrial base",
published by The Heritage Foundation, that the U.S defense base is on the brink of a crises losing
the military industrial complex. Thus, James .J. Carafano suggested five steps to prevent the
imminent industrial base collapse through the United States should have its own resources to protect
national security and emphasizing the advanced defense industries, In Addition to, facilitate the way
for defense nanotechnology industry. In my opinion, I see that there are many similarities and
differences among the President Eisenhower, and R. Bukminster Fuller, Andrew J. Bacevich and
James Jay Carafano about their vision on the military industries which are as

The Concept Of Prison Privatization
The concept of prison privatization is not new; it has its genesis as early as the 18th century.
However it has been received with mixed reviews over the effectiveness, the legality and whether or
not it has the civil rights of prisoners as a priority. More importantly is that prison privatization
profits are in direct conflict with a prosperous economy. According to Wood, (2003) the prison
industrial complex is the change in the criminal justice system due to the "rapid growth" and the
presence of private companies and their importance. Several factors have been identified as the
cause of the rise of this complex. The violence in our society and the people or entities that would
benefit from prison expansion are responsible. The prison complex consists of three concepts,
expansion, privatization, and regression. The growth took place rapidly from 1925–1939, and then
conversely a rapid decline during World War II. Again another flux occurred from the end of the war
to the beginnings of the 1960's. Wood states that potential reform during a ten year period from
1961–1972 on the part of the Democrats, resulted in a drop in the incarceration rate (Wood, 2003).
What is most interesting to note is what was taking place in the country during some of the dramatic
increases. During 1925–1939 the country suffered a major financial hit – The Great Depression.
People were out of work and food was scarce, in the 1960's the country was experiencing social
turmoil. These two

The Silent Crisis Summary
The relationship between Civilian and Military authorities has become increasingly complicated.
Gregory Foster worked to identify a number of areas that have compounded this expanding divide
in his article, "The Silent Crisis". Of the many issues presented, there are three that the author of this
paper believes to be the most pressing. First, the increasing politicization of the upper military
leadership. Second, the lack of strategically competent civilian authorities enhances this disparity.
Lastly, an increasingly influential military–industrial complex continues to cloud the judgement of
civil authorities. Foster warned that senior military leadership must remain politically neutral and
not let their decisions be influenced by partisan politics. However, Foster was not the first to warn of
the dangers in the relationship between civilian and military leaders. Samuel Huntington laid the
foundation for this relationship in his book, The Soldier and the State. Unfortunately, military
leadership has become increasingly politicized to the extent that the Obama Administration felt that
the political maneuvering of senior military leaders was conducted to specifically limit the
expansion of troop numbers during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring
Freedom ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Observers do not need to look far for the signs of a military–industrial complex that has become too
powerful and involved in politics. The Army has repeatedly attempted to halt the production and
spending on new tanks. The Air Force has spent almost $400 billion on the F–35 Joint Strike Fighter
program, nearly double the initial estimate. If the relationship between civilian and military leaders
is to be mended, leadership decisions must not be influenced by the military–industrial

The Influence Of Military Industrial Complex On Foreign...
In his farewell address to the nation in 1961, President Eisenhower warned the country of the
"acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial
complex" (Eisenhower 1961). Despite being a warning from so long ago, time has vindicated
Eisenhower's words. From the time of Eisenhower to present day, the United States has seen an
unprecedented growth of the power, size, and influence of the military industrial complex. Today,
the military industrial complex exerts great pressure on the foreign policy decision making process
of the United States government. This sad state of affairs is the result of a multitude of factors,
including iron triangles and issue networks, as well as the foreign policy bureaucracies that serve as
actors within these paradigms. In order to fully understand the influence of the military industrial
complex on foreign policy decision making, one must first understand the role of the foreign policy
bureaucracies in our government. Bureaucratic agencies in the government such as the State
Department, Department of Defense, are the primary architects of foreign policy. Of course, the
President cannot be the one making the decisions for each and every minutiae of foreign policy.
Having bureaucracies in charge of decision making has several advantages. They tend to be
extremely efficient, and are capable of functioning independently on a daily basis. Foreign policy
bureaucracies are able to become extremely

Mass Incarceration In American Culture
The orthodoxy of mass incarceration has become imbedded in modern American culture. This
American philosophy has permitted the construction of the most punitive carceral system in the
world (Thompson 703). It remains that somewhere in the underpinnings of the United States, there
live the elements required to generate and maintain it. Contemporary hyperpenality follows previous
epochs in American history that gave rise to institutions such as slavery, lynching, and Jim Crow.
Spectacles, such as the documentary 13th, have made attempts to represent the era of mass
incarceration as yet another iteration of American violence weaponized by dehumanization. These
endeavors to represent the penal system assume an immense amount of responsibility. ... Show more
The criminal law and sentencing became means to other ends such as winning elections, fighting
cultural wars, and refusing to accept that the United States had become a multiethnic and multiracial
country (Tonry 504).
Tonry focuses principally on the beginning of the institution's transformation, and he also includes
key American elements that compelled its creation: elections, culture, and race. Further forms of
penal representation concentrate on illuminating the specific actions of policy makers and the
consequences of those choices. Heather Thompson, a professor at the University of Michigan,
historicizes American mass incarceration and, in turn, situates it from a perspective that allows both
a discourse on the founding impetus and current harmfulness. Thompson

Military Industrial Complex : Global Issue Or Exaggerated?
Military–industrial complex: global issue or exaggerated?
On January 17, 1961, the president of the United States of America – Dwight Eisenhower – gave his
farewell speech. In this speech he addressed what he thought was a problem within the country, the
military–industrial complex. He warned the people for the increasing influence of the military
industry. Eisenhower said that military expenditure needed to be tightly controlled, whereas it
started to grow beyond it needs. He urged the people to 'accept the need for a large military
infrastructure, oppose profiteering, support international cooperation, and ensure that their chosen
representatives possessed the capability to engage in this delicate balancing act' (Janiewski 2011,
p.684). Chosen representatives should withhold military contractors to exploit the industry for
personal gains.
Economic gains should not be the reason for investments in the military, necessity should be.
Janiewski argued for example, that the Soviet superiority in missile technology was overdone to
exploit the industry domestically and was used by the Democrats in the elections. After the Korean
War the president already tried to reduce the size of the military. However, organizations like the
National Military–Industrial Conference (NMIC) and his political opponents kept advertising for
investments in the military force, whereas the first group had personal gains on this matter and the
second group used it as a way to gain political power. In

Angela Davis : The Greatest Philosopher Of All Time
Angela Davis is the greatest philosopher of all time because of her work on the "Prison–Industrial
Complex" , racism and feminism. She is a star student of 2 Marxist professors (Theodor Adorno and
Hebert Marcuse) and it shows in her continual efforts to bring about change and equality to our
prison system and day to day lives. Angela Davis has dedicated her life to the improvement of the
lives of others regardless of race, class, or country.
Born January 24, 1944 to Frank Davis and Sally Davis, a service station owner and school teacher,
Angela Yvonne Davis was eager to learn and escape her racist home town of Birmingham, Alabama.
She grew up in a big, well to do family that moved into the neighborhood called "Dynamite Hill"
from the ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Women and minority workers are almost always payed less than a white male for the same job even
if they have the same educational background and experience. Racism and segregation keeps poor
neighborhoods poor while the money goes to suburban, white neighborhoods.
As a student in the Elizabeth Irwin High School in Greenwich Village she became interested in
socialism. She was exposed to many organizations at her school who were fighting for freedom,
equality and liberation. After graduation she was accepted into Brandeis University in Waltham,
Massachusetts. During her freshman year she had the chance to attend the Worlds Festival for Youth
and Students in Helsinki, Finland which furthered her interest in socialism and communism. During
her trip abroad she toured Paris, France, London, England and Geneva, Switzerland which gave her
an interest in foreign affairs and cultures. She was accepted at Hamilton College French Program in
her junior year and spent a year of study in France.
In France she was involved in a lot of protest rallies and political movements. While still in France
Angela found out about the bombing of a church in her hometown. Once she learned the names of
the four little girls who died, she realized they were acquaintances and family friends. The church
bombing left Angela grief stricken and angry at a world where four little girls could be taken out due
to their skin color. Back home in the United States the fight for civil rights was going

America Needs a Strong Military Industrial Complex Essay
America Needs a Strong Military Industrial Complex
By mid–1942, World War II was looking bleak for the Allied powers. The German Wehrmacht was
blitzing through Soviet Russia, the Luftwaffe had laid waste to much of London, Rommel was about
to take Africa, and the Japanese nearly had control of the Pacific. Fortunately, as the Axis started
running low on materiel, America was increasing the Allied supply dramatically. This enormous
production capacity displayed by the U.S. was the product of their new military–industrial complex,
as plants across the country geared up production of weapons and combat vehicles and the
government began pumping resources into the creation of new military–oriented production
facilities. The American ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Stalin, in a toast to his brief allies, made it "to American production, without which this war would
have been lost", while Churchill, in his book recalling the war, claimed, "Through the materials and
weapons [the U.S.] gave us we were actually able to wage war as if we were a nation of fifty–eight
millions instead of forty–eight".
While the onset of war led to a hugely inflated military production capacity, American industry
never completed reversion back to the pre–war focus on purely civilian items. In fact, the value of
military production facilities increased by 3300% between 1939 and 1944, and less than a third of
all plants created during the war were converted to civilian production (Walton 551). Paul Koistinen
writes,
By slow stages, large and sustained military expenditures produced an enduring Military–Industrial
Complex with the self–serving consequences suggested by the World War II economy and, more
seriously, with the potential for perpetuating the forces of modern warfare which had provided for
the initial growth of such a complex (90).
This perpetuation fed right into the arms race created by the new Cold War between the USSR and
NATO.
It was less than a year after war ended in Europe that Churchill revealed in his "Sinews of Peace"
address that, "From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic an iron curtain has descended
across the Continent". The Soviet Union became extremely

The Prison Industrial Complex ( Tabibi )
Question 1. According to Angela Davis (2003a), social historian Mike Davis was the first to coin the
term prison industrial complex, in his research of the California penal system in the 1990s. The
prison industrial complex refers to the coinciding relationship between corporations, government,
correctional communities, and their collective economic interest in prison expansion and high rates
of incarceration (Davis, 2003a). That is, each of these components benefit economically from
perpetuating the notion that increasing crime rates are the causation for prison expansion. However,
scholars and activists contest this belief, stating that crime rates are decreasing, and that prison
expansion is done to increase profits through imprisonment (Davis, 2003a). In this model, criminal
justice policy, crime control and the bodies of the marginalized, are organized and managed using a
business philosophy focused solely of profitability. The term prison industrial complex is a replica
of the military industrial complex (Tabibi, 2015a). Both refer to their respective industry as
providing massive amounts of revenue in the American economy. To provide perspective and
context to the amount of money produced by the prison industry in the United States, the film
Corrections (2001) by Hunt, cites the amount as being upwards of forty billion dollars.
Corporations, elected officials, and government agents, all have an invested interest in the expansion
of the prison system (Davis, 2003a).

The Rise Of The Military Industrial Complex Of Germany...
The rise of the military–industrial complex of Germany from 1933 until its demise in April 1945
was built on manipulation and greed. The Nazis manipulated the great industrial combines of
Germany to the profits to be gained in the pending rearmament program. Hitler and his inner
sanctum created the ultimate crony capitalistic state; emphasizing greed for power and fortune.
Hitler present himself and the party as the final barrier against Russian Bolshevism. Hitler's adept
manipulation of these industrial giants allowed him to throw the world into a maelstrom of killing.
While those same individuals sought to control him; Hitler controlled them under the guise of a final
victory. Whatever else it was; Hitler 's short–lived regime was also a colossal industrial process by
which the wealth and productive power of much of Europe were wrenched from its normal purposes
and converted to a machine for killing. While World War II presents itself in part as a validation of
various theories on air power and the role of armor; it more importantly reaffirmed the concept of
the nationalizing an entire nation's industrial output for conducting war. The World War II was one
of industrial throughput (raw materials, labor, design, infrastructure and delivery to the battlefield)
of two industrial powers; the Allies and Germany. Unfortunately, each of these topics could
constitute a Master's thesis in itself. I will limit my discourse in select events that I found to impact
Germany

The Politics And Last National Security Essay
Arms Trade, Weapons Sales, Armament Sales are just few terms used for the manufacture and sale
or trade of devices to protect a country, attack another and quite possibly benefit economically, or
politically on a global scale. Countries, entities, factions, make, sell, and give things of destruction
to others. This is a reality. The intent of this paper is to provide information that individuals can use
to determine the necessity. The economics, the politics and last the National Security are the three
main discussion points.
History
History of Arms Trade, Weapons Trade or the trade any of items necessary to protect, feed or
conquer dates back to the dawn of time. Scholars note that arms trade or weapons trade could be
traced back 300,000 years (Thieme). As "humans" evolved and interacted with each other, scholars
speculate that the trade of many things occurred. The trade would include stories, knowledge, which
can be considered intangibles, then the tangibles, seeds for food, things to make tools, how to make
a shelter, weapons for protection and survival. Basically trade included instruction and things
needed for every aspect of life; to survive. Agers 2
Elements of Thought
Think about it this way. You have a clan or tribe with really good sharp rocks and a clan or tribe
with really good wood staffs. You put both together you have a more lethal device, for protection
and providing food. An item that was designed to help a human to survive evolved

Analysis Of Dwight Eisenhower's Farewell Address
"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence,
whether sought or unsought, by the military–industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise
of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination
endanger their liberties or democratic processes" (Dwight Eisenhower). These were the words of
Dwight Eisenhower, the 34th president of the United States, in his 1961 Farewell Address. These
words were a warning to Americans. Eisenhower was one of the greatest military minds America
has ever known. Leading America through World War II and Korea, and winning against all odds.
He was a highly respectable figure and highly intelligent. He used these skills to lead the American
people into a prosperous period. His warnings of the future were to be taken with the utmost
urgency and fear. He wanted to protect the American people from themselves. Eisenhower's farewell
address was intended to be both a synopsis of the period of his presidency, and a warning to future
generations. His gravest predictions were of the government themselves. He feared that one day the
governments; state, local, and federal; could attempt to infringe on their rights and freedoms.
Eisenhower believed that the first attempt that was already trying to dig in it's roots was the military
industrial complex.
The military industrial complex was a term coined by Eisenhower in this speech. It has been defined
as the intrenching of the military into the government of a country. In this he feared that having a
perpetual military force, and even worse a constantly active military could infringe the rights of
Americans. How would this happen? Well, in America, there is not a strict democracy. America is a
representative democracy. This means that Americans do not vote for all of their decisions.
Switzerland is a true democracy. They vote in every election for everything. However, in America
citizens elect people to be in charge of their voting. Americans give up power to politicians so
people don't need to worry about laws and regulation. Because of this Americans allow them to have
the keys to their money, powers and the future of their nation. This is a great

Analysis Of Why We Fight By Eugene Jarecki
As a child in the United States you are given the idea that freedom is what we fight for. This is the
backdrop given to us all, but the reality behind it just gets a whole lot bigger. The film "Why we
Fight" by Eugene Jarecki effectively incorporates the opinions of civilians, government officials,
media, and the others on the other side of the mirror including videos of Middle East debacles while
also adding in important facts on the military–industrial complex. Jarecki included video clips of the
responses given when civilians were asked why we fight. Many of the younger ones had the idea
that the United States fights for freedom and liberty, but as the age number increased the confidence
in their responses decreased. By using this Jarecki

Analysis Of The Film Why We Fight
In the 1940's a series of propaganda films titled Why We Fight were produced for the purpose of
defining the enemies of World War 2 to justify the necessity of America's involvement in war. Hitler
needed to be defeated, Nazism had to be destroyed, and tyranny had to be stopped for the sake of
the American way of life by any means necessary. How could society argue against America's role
in the world war when freedom was being threatened? As Martin Luther King Jr. said "Injustice
anywhere is a threat to everywhere." No questions asked, Americans mobilized in the name of
liberty and freedom. However the 2005 documentary film Why We Fight directed by Eugene
Jarecki is not a sequel or war propaganda. The film informs the audience and questions America 's
military industrial complex that has since dictated policy since the victory of World War 2. With the
help of narration, soundbites, and credible speakers Jarecki shines light on the pernicious impact of
the armed industry on our government, army, and citizens. The film opens with President Dwight
Eisenhower's farewell speech at the end of World War 2. Eisenhower's speech is significant because
he warns Americans about the seemingly permanent presence of the arm industry, that had taken
root in America. Moreover Eisenhower is not stating this from a liberal point of view, signifying that
the concern of the military industrial complex is not a party issue or an ideology issue, but rather an
universal one. This piece of

Rhetorical Analysis Of Military Industrial Complex Speech

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Darlene Tourigny

More from Darlene Tourigny (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Rhetorical Analysis Of Military Industrial Complex Speech