This document provides a review for a quiz on the theories of Skinner and Bandura. For Skinner, it lists 12 key points to know including the differences between classical and operant conditioning, types of reinforcement and punishment, and Skinner's views on internal processes and human behavior. For Bandura, it also lists 14 key points such as his views on depression, collective efficacy, self-regulation, and how vicarious learning is affected by models. Students are advised to know the theories well and be prepared for application questions that require identifying terms and processes.
Quiz-3 ReviewSkinner1. Know the differences between classical.docx
1. Quiz-3 Review
Skinner
1. Know the differences between classical and operant
conditioning.
2. Understand Positive and Negative Reinforcement, as well as
Positive and Negative Punishment.
3. Understand primary and generalized / conditioned /
secondary (these are all the same thing) reinforcers.
4. Understand Skinner’s biography.
5. Know about reinforcement schedules and continuous,
variable, fixed and intermittent types.
6. Know how Skinner views internal processes, and what he
considers internal processes.
7. Understand what Skinner believed shaped human behavior.
8. Know what Skinner thought about punishment.
9. Understand extinction.
10. Know what Skinner’s approach is called.
11. Know what Skinner thought about freedom.
12. Be prepared for scenarios where you must identify terms
and processes.
Bandura
1. Know what Bandura felt about depression and its causes.
2. Understand collective efficacy and proxy agency.
3. Understand what happens when the model is punished.
4. Know what Bandura means by human agency.
5. Know and understand the components of self-regulation.
6. Understand what contributes to self-efficacy.
7. Know the disengagement techniques well enough to identify
them in scenarios.
8. Understand the Triadic Reciprocal Causation Theory.
9. Know how Bandura explains deviant behavior.
10. Know about Bandura’s systematic desensitization.
11. Understand efficacy expectations and outcome expectations.
12. Know about chance encounters and fortuitus events.
2. 13. Understand how vicarious learning is affected by the model.
14. Know how Skinner’s theory and Bandura’s theory are
similar and different.
Post 1
Jazmyn Crider
Nov 2, 2019Local: Nov 2 at 6:23pm<br>Course: Nov 2 at
5:23pm
Manage Discussion Entry
In this case Victor's performance appraisal could be counter
productive because he was not assessed as an individual based
on his performance but rated as part of a group. From Victor's
prospective this would be discouraging overall negatively
influencing his individual work ethic. As an employee one
should feel valuable as an individual and as part of a group.
Nathan was right to encourage Victor's group efforts but wrong
in dismissing his individual contributes. Nathan Should have
provided positive feedback for Victor's accomplishments and
constructive criticism for area's which he could improve.
Because Nathan minimized Victor's individual contribution to
group projects he could have possibly decreased Victor's
willingness to perform at a high level and his desire to be a part
of the organization as a whole.
Post 2
Larry Huff
SundayLocal: Nov 3 at 3:27pm<br>Course: Nov 3 at 2:27pm
Manage Discussion Entry
It seems as if Nathan is using a results appraisal approach. The
end result seems more important to Nathan than the
performance of any individual. Nathan even states that
everyone received excellent ratings. Victor was not given the
opportunity to discuss his performance. He was simply told to
read and sign his appraisal. I would suggest that Victor
schedule a more convenient time with Nathan to discuss his
performance. According to expectancy theory Victor has a low
3. level of instrumentality. He does not feel that his performance
is leading to a sense of accomplishment. This can lead to low
employee motivation. Victor needs to express this to Nathan
so that they can set new goals for Victor or better help him to
achieve existing goals
Post 3
Susan Autry
MondayLocal: Nov 4 at 11:48am<br>Course: Nov 4 at 10:48am
Manage Discussion Entry
Victor is wanting a true sincere evaluation but his supervisor
seems to being going through the motions to get all evaluations
done without putting much thought into it. This could make
Victor have negative feelings towards his job. He could become
very unmotivated because according to his boss's evaluation
style, it doesn't matter if you work hard and do your best or you
don't, everyone seems to get the same evaluation. This is
discouraging and doesn't give Victor anything to work towards.
Since Victor's supervisor is so busy at the moment, he could
request a one on one meeting at a time that is convenient for
both of them to discuss his concerns and request more feedback
specific to his job performance. This would kind of be a touchy
situation since Victor is worried about not getting the raise he
wants if he brings up his worries of his performance not being
up to par over the past year.
Post 4
Julia Knaggs
MondayLocal: Nov 4 at 11:53am<br>Course: Nov 4 at 10:53am
Manage Discussion Entry
First, Victor should not be discouraged by this experience.
Clearly, he is already a highly motivated and appreciated
employee in this company. Additionally, this is not the only
opportunity Victor has to discuss the new performance
standards for his job. Before these routine performance
appraisals, Victor should make sure his supervisor knows what
4. he is hoping to gain from the conversation. It may be
intimidating to bring up these issues to his supervisor, but this
will only further prove that he serves as an asset to the company
by being apart of their team. If he reaches the end of the
meeting and he feels his concerns still were not heard, he
should ask to schedule another meeting while still showing his
supervisor that he has a positive attitude within his role. By
coming in with his own list of expectations for himself/the
conversation and outlining goals for future appraisals, Victor
can show that he is worthy of his spot in the company.
It's also important to note how goal-setting theory as discussed
in our textbook can be used to understand Victor's experience
and the subject of employee motivation in this example. This
theory urges that managers motivate workers by focusing on
creating direction and vision through organizational goals.
Moreover, these goals must be specific and difficult to push
workers to the next level. If Victor were to discuss the
importance of goals in his own work with his supervisor, he
might consider implementing a goal setting process into future
performance appraisals for all employees. This way, not only
will Victor have a way to share his thought about his new
performance standards, but every employee around him will be
motivated to contribute more to the company because of
Victor's confidence and creativity.
Post 5
Leah Chapman
MondayLocal: Nov 4 at 8:02pm<br>Course: Nov 4 at 7:02pm
Manage Discussion Entry
My advice for Victor would be to take action and speak up to
Nathan and express to him what he feels should be talked about.
The meeting and rushing to get the products out could have
waited until after the meeting with Victor was over or just asked
if he could have waited a minute to finish the paper work to get
the orders out in a timely manner. Nathan basically washed off
5. Victors meeting with him and did not allow for much, or any,
feedback. Victor should raise a concern with the new
performance standards in his job description to make it known
that he think or would like to see some changes in the outcome
of what the company is doing. He could also talk about the
expectancy in the job as well.
Post 6
Annalise Bruer
WednesdayLocal: Nov 6 at 12:34am<br>Course: Nov 5 at
11:34pm
Manage Discussion Entry
I actually had this same thing happen to me in high school. Of
course we didn’t have performance appraisals, but we had
grades which I took very seriously. In one of my classes, there
were only 2 people including me. The teacher didn’t really give
us much book work because we were able to do more hands-on
stuff due to the lack of students. At the end of the semester, the
teacher gave us a high A but I knew it wasn’t what I deserved.
She kind of just guessed our grades. I could have done better
than the grade or I could have done worse. But the fact that I
didn’t know what my grade honestly should have been really
bothered me. If I could go back, I should have explained this to
my teacher and had her explain how she got my grade or even
just tell me what I was good at and what I could have improved.
This is the same thing Victor should do. As communication is a
big role in the work place, he should tell his boss that he would
rather have his score reflect how he performed rather than it be
easy. The employees of this work place have no reason to be
motivated after they view their appraisal. This will lead to lack
of effort and a faulty staff.
Reply Reply to Comment
Chapter 13