1) The document provides background information on a 19-year-old suspect from a slum area who was humiliated in childhood and lost his mother. He is skilled with knives. 2) Key evidence in the case includes the murder weapon (a knife) and eyewitness testimony. 3) Juror #5, Subhash Udhghate, comes from a similar background as the accused. He is logical, passive, and bases his opinions on facts. His own rough childhood means he is sensitive to accusations about where someone comes from. 4) The document analyzes how Juror #5's past life experiences are reflected in his behavior during deliberations, such as his knowledge of knives

1. EK RUKA HUA FAISLA
Character Analysis

2. BACKGROUND OF THE
SUSPECT
19-year-old
Belongs to slum area
Humiliated from childhood
Abusive Father
Lost his mother in
childhood
Expert in knife
skills

4. Key evidences-
The knife Eyewitness 1 (Old Man) Eyewitness 2 (The Lady)

5. Juror No – 5
Subhash Udhghate
• Defensive
• Comes from a similar background as
the accused.
• Logical in his reasoning.
• Passive constructive personality
• Bases his opinions on facts.

6. POLITE &
WELL
MANNERED
TRANSFIGURE
IN NATURE
OPEN
MINDED
ROUGH
CHILDHOOD
PRESENCE
OF
MIND
Disapprove
using
non-verbal
means
Gets up and walks out
Instead of starting a fight.
Offered seat to
the fellow
members
Became aggressive when
called a traitor
Open to other’s
opinions
Have seen a lot
of violence
Demonstrated the
attack by Changing
the Grip
TAKING
STAND FOR
OTHERS
Stand for juror 11
on accusation by
Juror 7
UNABLE
TO
EXPRESS
Was unable to express
his viewpoint when
asked by Juror no. 8

7. PAST LIFE EXPERIENCES AND HOW IT IS REFLECTED IN THE
BEHAVIOUR
Himself belonged to the slum area-
• Non- Verbal- When Mr. Siddiqui was speaking against the just because he belonged to the
slum area, our character without saying anything just moved out of the room
• Verbal- being sensitive on the topic, when a character was asked where he came from, our
character raised voice
• Juror no. 5 grew Up in an Environment where incidents of killing using
knives was common-
• Verbal- Knowledge of knives enabled him to disprove one of the major evidence against
guilty
• Non-Verbal- He observed the knife carefully as if some fact was disturbing him

8. VERBAL MEANS-
In the beginning our character
was shy and unable to express
himself because he felt
intimidated.
After that incident he
started expressing
himself occasionally
whether it was in general
conversation or putting
his points firmly.
But he got very angry and
finally vented out when he
was called a traitor by
JUROR 8.

9. Silence can mean different things to different people and in different
situations
Requested the jurors to wait as one was in Restroom
JUROR 8 was explaining that slap was not the reason of
the murder
– eye movement expressing consent
Interfered in the attack by JUROR 3 respect other person’s personal space
Twisted hand of Juror 3 to express objection
Different non-verbal body
motions such as facial
expressions and gestures.

10. CREDITS: This presentation template was created
by Slidesgo, including icons by Flaticon, and
infographics & images by Freepik.
THANK you
Saksham Chawla [ 20DM256 ]
Rashi Jain [ 20DM267 ]
Harsh Raghubanshi [ 20DM259 ]
Aditi Mittal [20DM275 ]
Utkarsh Singh [ 20DM231 ]
Utkarsh Agarwal [ 20DM229 ]