1. EK RUKA HUA FAISLA
Submitted by :
arnold
dheeraj
ankit
santosh
nitish
2.
3.
4. FACTS PRESENTED IN COURT
The knife; the tool used to murder
the old man
Eye witness 1 – an old man who lived just
beneath the house of the victim
Eye witness 2 – a lady who lived right across the
street just opposite to the victim’s house
4
5. THE VERDICT
*At the start of discussion all agreed that the boy was
guilty except for one i.e. juror 8
*Everyone tried to convince him that he was wrong, but he
stood his ground and never change his opinion.
*After listening to his thought, juror 9 an old man
supported his opinion.
*Juror 8 was very creative and came up with great facts
about the case which showed that the boy wasn’t guilty.
*With his persuasive power and after learning all those
facts, the remaining jurors subsequently started to change
their minds.
*Juror 3 however was aggressive and had a sense of self
important, did try to prove that the boy was guilty but
finally gave up.
6. Juror 8 proved that it was impossible for the
old man to heard the noise and to walk down
the hall and reaching the front door in 15 sec
He lied to the court as he wasn’t known to
anybody so he tried seeking attention from
the media and the mass people
They also proved that the woman lied.
Finally decided that the boy was innocent
7. Social Cognitive Theory :-
*Jurors learned and made the final decisions or changed
their behavior through social environment and personal
factor.
*E.g. – juror no. 9 decided to support juror 8’s decision
that the boy was innocent where everybody else were
against it.
Experiential learning :-
*All the jurors were learning through direct experience
*They were working as a team to come to a final decision
in that situation of making verdict.
Cognitive theory :-
*Based on the facts and finding about the case, they
agreed on the final outcome i.e. the boy was innocent
8. Working as a team:-
* Had a common goal to give a verdict and they were
interdependent to each other
Social loafing :-
* Some jurors were less responsible and contributing less in the
discussion.
Free-rider effect, as some were not giving enough
participation under the assumption that others will cover it.
Group cohesiveness :-
* From the beginning, there were disagreement among some
jurors and some were not in the favor that the boy was
innocent
* Nevertheless, the group stick together and finally made the
decision that the boy was innocent, and every jurors respected
the decision.
* Group dynamics :-
* They interacted and some jurors were able to influenced
attitudes and behaviors of others.
9. o Juror 8 leadership could be classified as a democratic
leadership. He involves other members actively and asks
them their point of view to discuss.
o Juror 8 leadership could be classified as a supportive
leadership. He provided a great deal of direction and leads
with his ideas.
o Juror 8 leadership could be described as Transformational
Leadership. He had inspired the other jury members to
transcend their own self- interest in order to have a
meaningful and healthy analysis of the case.
10. * Stereotyping :
* The last person who changed his opinion that the accused
was not guilty i.e. juror 3 was actually stereotyping. In the
past, his son, a teenager once had fight with him &
because of this incident he made a general perception
that all teenagers are irresponsible & could indulge in
crime very easily.
* One of the jurors had a very selective perception he just
accepted the evidence that the boy was guilty on its face
value & made up his mind which was easier for him to
believe without proper thought.
* Projection:
* According to one of the juror 10, the accused came from
slum & poor background. The boy also had a history of
small crime. He projected that the boy is guilty, as most
of the criminals come from poor & slum background.
11. COMPARISON BETWEEN
THREE JURORS
Lead roles :
Juror 8 :- Played by
K.K. Raina
Juror 9 :- Played by
Annu Kapoor
Juror 3 :- Played by
Pankaj Kapur
12. J8 :
• His perception was very positive.
• Initially he was having doubt about the case, but
as discussion goes on he was convinced the accused
wasn’t guilty.
J9 :
• Good perception
• Wanted to discuss and listen more about the case
J3 :
• Bad perception
• Always wanted other jurors to be on his side
• Forced others to made the decision what he
wanted them to make
13. J8 :
Openness to experience :-
*Degree of intellectual curiosity, creativity and a
preference for novelty and variety.
Emotional stability :-
*Calm, self confidence and cool.
*High Self efficacy
Proactive personality :-
*Identifying opportunities, showing initiatives and
act on them till the desired result comes.
* Active constructive :-
*Actively participated in the discussion. Took
initiatives and ideas were logical and reliable.
14. J9 :
Agreeableness :-
*Compassionate, cooperative, warm and agreeable
Good listener :-
*Was listening to every juror whether positive or negative
opinion until he came with valid point.
Patience :-
*Showed patient when other jurors made inappropriate
behaviors with him, Patiently observed everyone’s point
of view very closely.
J3 :
Neuroticism :-
*experiencing unpleasant emotions easily such as anger,
anxiety, aggression, depression, or vulnerability
Narcissism :-
*Arrogant, sense of self importance & self admiration, or
extreme selfishness.
* Active destructive
15. J8 :
Intrinsic motivation :-
*Doing his job and trying to achieve the best from
the case to get his own satisfaction and
fulfillment.
Need for achievement (McClelland’s need) :-
*He was seeking for excellence, competition,
challenging and difficult goals
Progression satisfaction :-
*He remained at a particular need level until that
need was satisfied.
16. J9 :
* He was very supportive and a motivating factor for J8 .
* He motivated him to come up with valid points.
* When everybody were against J8’s opinion, he stood up in his
side
J3 :
Need for power (McClelland’s theory):-
* He wanted to direct, control and influence the jurors’
opinion.
17. J8 :
Persuasive :-
*By providing new info, he convinced others to
change their minds.
*Great communicator
*Positive attitude and leadership skills
J9 :
*Good attitude
*Opportunity grabber, he made some relevant
points which was the turning point of the case.
J3 :
*Loud mouthed, Bad attitude
*Selfish
*Stubborn, Didn't respect others opinion.