Recruitment Fiasco at CITPR ltd.

1. Human Resource Management
Recruitment Fiasco At CITPR Ltd.
By- GROUP 4
MANVI BOLIA - 20DM118
KAMAKSHI KAUSHIK - 20DM094
KRISHANK KAPOOR - 20DM105
KANISHKA SINGH - 20DM096
MIHIR MANCHANDA - 20DM120
NEHAL CHUGH - 20DM135

2. Discuss the major issues highlighted in
the case study.
1

3. Elusive behaviour displayed
by Mr. Swami concerning
the offer letters.
Communicating results to
students without official
communication.
Informally revealing the
results of the recruitment
process.
3. Re-Center
Communication gaps
between the employees of
CITPR.
Recruitment process
initiated without
confirmation of sure
vacancies in the company.
Refraining students from
appearing in any other
interviews without any
official communication from
CITPR.
The HR director not keeping
tabs on the recruitment
drive

4. In your opinion could Mr. D Ganesh
have taken some measures to avoid the
embarrassment caused to CITPR?
Justify your option with relevant
arguments.
2

5. Thinks would have been
different if better communication
methods were used rather than
just sticking to the guidelines
even after missing the deadline.
A clear conversation between
Mr. Ganesh and Mr. VN Swami
could have turned the situation
for better.
After the recruitment fiasco, he
could have stabilized the
situation by informing the
College about the shortage and
the mishap that has happened
from the Company so that the
college could have asked its
students to sit for other
companies.
He could have been more
proactive in staying up to date
about the recruitment drive at
TTC College of Engineering and
Management. There was a
serious communication gap
between the Hr department
concerning new recruits and
vacancies.

6. Elucidate the serious omissions by Mr.
Swami related to the campus
recruitment drive at TTC college of
Engineering and Management.
3

7. Omissions by Mr. Swami
2
3
1 He did not confirm the vacancies in the organisation.
He displayed elusive behaviour when contacted by Mr. Sampat regarding the offer
letters.
He informally revealed the results of the selection process, thereby violating ethics and
creating unnecessary problems in the first place.
4 He also did not inform about this fiasco to the HR Director or Mr. Sampat.
5
He left people hanging instead of taking a decision as to whether or not to put the process
on hold or not.

8. Lapses on Mr. Sampat’s part
2
3
1 Mr. Sampat communicated the results to the students without any official confirmation
from CITPR.
He did not inform the Director of the institute about this fiasco.
He did not let the students sit for the rest of the placement process even after the
vague response from Mr. Swami.
4 He was passive when contacting Mr. Swami and let time pass instead of acting with
the information available to him.
5
He did not try hard to find out what the issue was in the delay of the offer letters.

9. Do you think the actions taken against
Mr. Swami and Mr. Sampat were
justified? Substantiate your stance with
reasons.
4

10. The actions taken against Mr.
Sampat is also justified
because he should have
demanded for offer letters then
and there but he trusted them
waited and didn’t let students
sit in the placement drive.
The actions taken against Mr.
Swami was justified as he
ignored the direction that has
been given to him by the HR
Head Mr. D. Ganesh and went
ahead with the recruitment
drive and which in turn has
tarnished the reputation of
CITPR and also affected the life
of 25 students involved in it.

11. THANK YOU!!!!