Mr. Swami, the recruitment manager at CITPR, unofficially selected 25 students from TTC College after a recruitment drive. He congratulated the students and told the college that they were considered out of the placement process without official offer letters from CITPR. After multiple reminders, CITPR said it would take more time to decide on hiring due to restructuring. This caused major issues like stopping students from other interviews and lack of response to queries. Mr. Swami's actions were unjustified and he was dismissed for not following proper procedure and damaging the company's relationship with the college. The case highlights the importance of proper communication, transparency, and avoiding rash decisions in recruitment.

1. HRM
“A Recruitment Fiasco”
GARGI MANGAL- 20DM077
GAURAV THAKUR- 20DM079
KARTIK GARG- 20DM099
NEHAL JAIN- 20DM137
NIHAR SRIVASTAVA- 20DM139
PARIDHI MALIK- 20DM149

2. AFTER A MONTH
Thank you very much Mr. Swami. I will congratulate the students via e-
mail and as per our placement policies, these 25 students will be
considered out of the placement process.
Mr. Sampat! You will be happy to know that we have selected 25
students from your Campus. The official communication of offer letters
will be finalized within the next 20 days.
After multiple constant reminders, we are yet to receive the official offer
letters for the selected students. It is very concerning as these students
are not allowed to sit in job interviews of other companies as well.
Mr. Sampat, due to an organizational restructuring in the company it
will take some more time to decide about the hiring.

3. MAJOR ISSUES HIGHLIGHTED IN
THE CASE
Revealing the results of recruitment drive unofficially just on the basis of personal
relationship.
Stopping the students from further sitting for the placement process without any
official letter from Mr. Swami.
Not providing proper response for the queries about the offer letters by the
company.
Rash decision making without concrete evidence by the Recruitment Manager, Mr
Swami, at CITPR.
Lack of coordination and awareness amongst the employees of CITPR.

4. Possible Measures taken by Mr. D Ganesh
Mr. Swami do not go for the recruitment until
confirmation comes from the international
client
After this since he was very satisfied with Mr. Swami’s style of
working, he chose not to interfere much later.
Mr. Ganesh could have followed up with the latest developments in the case.
Mr. Swami took the decision without a final confirmation from Mr. Kapoor (VP-
Product Development) for a final confirmation on the manpower requirement.
After the Recruitment Drive Mr. Ganesh could have taken the initiative of
informing the real situation and the uncertainties

5. The serious omissions by Mr. Swami related to the
campus recruitment drive at TTC College

6. Justification Of Actions Taken Against Mr.
Swami And Mr. Sampat
Yes, the actions taken were correct because both persons involved were not being
ethical towards their job.
Despite no concrete agreement between the CITPR and the TTC College, Mr.
Sampat refrained the students from the placement procedure.
Mr. Sampat could have told about the situation to the Director earlier to avoid the
delay in the placement process
Mr. Swami was very unprofessional in his conduct as the recruitment manager.
Mr. Swami’s dismissal was justified as he had tarnished the relationship enjoyed
between the company and the college.

7. Insights
This case talks about the recruiting problem between CITPR and
TTC college.
This case illustrates the value of proper communication
between people working in the organization
Inter and Intra organizational communication
It also talks about the value of timely and continuous
communication
Importance of patience when it comes to important decisions
which affect other people as well
Importance of transparency between alliances

8. Thank You!