Media

1. FMP Evaluation
Your name

2. Production Process Evaluation

3. Research
• What were the strengths of your research?
• How did your research help your product?
• What were the weaknesses of your research?
• What could you have done better/improve?
• What effect would this have had on your product?

4. Planning
• What were the strengths of your planning?
• How did your planning help your product?
• What were the weaknesses of your planning?
• What could you have done better/improve?
• What effect would this have had on your product?

5. Time Management
• Did you manage your time well?
• Did you complete your project on time or would your products have
improved with additional time?
• What would you have done if you had more time to produce your work?

6. Technical Qualities
• Compare your work to similar existing products and discuss the similarities and differences
• Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page alongside an existing product
• Use text boxes and arrows

7. Aesthetic Qualities
• Does your work look good? Was it creative? What aspects of your game’s visuals do you
like? What would you improve? How would you improve it?
• Discuss the strengths and weaknesses
• Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them
• Use text boxes and arrows

8. Audience Appeal
• How have you appealed to your target audience? What specific bits of content would appeal to y
• Refer to your findings from your questionnaire.
• Put your final piece(s) in the centre of a page and analyse them
• Use text boxes and arrows

9. Peer
Feedback

10. Feedback 1
• What did you like about the product?
– The consistency of the branding is clear and all the products have a clear
theme and tie together as a media package.
– The camerawork is steady and the editing choices are thought out and synced
to the audio well.
– The magazine reflects the conventions of the genre.
– The deck design used images that are consistant with existing products.
• What improvements could have been made to the product?
• The video is slowly paced and could have done with a build up of action
and tension in the content and audio to draw the audience in.
• The magazine would have appealed to a wider audience with use of a
selling line and basic information such as issue numbers and pricing.
• The deck design could have been edited with more precision and thought
to create a more realistic and united design with the images and text into
one final graphic.

11. Feedback 2
• What did you like about the product?
– I like the video product as it showed some good content and the beat was matching to
the tricks
– I also like the skateboard deck design as it has an artsy feel
– The skateboard magazine design looks very professional
• What improvements could have been made to
the product?
• I think that the skateboard design could be more slick with the board as in blend the images and the name
to make it look more realistic I also think that magazine should have a price and an issue number

12. Feedback 3
• What did you like about the product?
– I like the video as I like the music syncs with the video
– I like the colour of the skateboard as it has a wood effect
– I like the writing on the magazine as it draws attention the
the name brand.
• What improvements could have been made to the
product?
– Everything could be improved with more writing for
example the skateboard doesn’t have much writing neither
does the magazine.

13. Peer Feedback Summary
• What do you agree with from your peer
feedback?
• What do you disagree with from your peer
feedback?

14. Peer Feedback Summary