This document summarizes the key points from a presentation by Luk Zelderloo of EASPD on disability inclusive disaster risk reduction. EASPD represents over 10,000 social service organizations for persons with disabilities across Europe. A survey conducted by EASPD found that disaster preparedness and response programs do not adequately address the needs of persons with disabilities and do not involve specialized disability service providers. The survey also found a lack of training for service providers on how to support persons with disabilities during disasters. There is a demonstrated willingness by specialized service providers to work with stakeholders to strengthen disaster response and ensure the safety of persons with disabilities.
2. What is EASPD?
• EU NGO in the disability sector
• It represents over 10,000 social
service provider organisations
across Europe
• Based in Brussels, established in
1996
• EASPD plays a key role on a
European level as a representative
of disability service providers
• Objective: Promote equal
3. Membership
• 28 Umbrella Member
Organisations (UMO)
• 71 Single Agency Member
Organisations (SAMO)
• Observers
• 18 Cooperation Agreements
3
4. 3 Pillars
4
Service provision
to members:
networking,
exchange
possibilities to
members at
European,
national, regional
and local level
Research and
Development: as
basis for innovation
and improvement
of service provision
Policy-influencing:
voicing service
providers in
Europe (Political
Representation
towards EU
Institutions and
Council of
Europe)
5. Pre-disaster aspects
• General accessibility of built
environment
• Disability perspective in intervention
plans
• Accessibility of information
• Quality of available data
• Training of the rescue team
5
6. Response and Interventions
• Access to rescue vehicles /
intervenants (design for all)
• Reliable data system
• Medical interventions
• Temporary shelters
6
7. What after a disaster?
Post- Disaster Challenges:
• Special focus on chronically ill (diets,
radiation, diabetes…)
• Therapeutic (post-trauma) support:
mental health
• Special needs education in temporary
education schemes
• Employment? Anti-poverty strategies?
• Disability perspective in reconstruction
plans and strategies
• Access to cash (loans)
7
8. Human Rights and
Ethical Dimensions
• Right to live
• Responsibilit
y to choose
• What is our
value set?
8
9. EASPD
Disaster Preparedness
and Response (DPR) Survey
It examines European Service Providers for
Persons with Disabilities (PwD):
• Experience and Possibility to Act
(methodology and protocols, trainings and
models of good practice (MOGP) in disaster
situations;
• Awareness of national, regional, local and
municipal plans, (specifically dedicated to
PwD) for DPR;
• Level of Involvement in emergency
preparedness and response.
9
10. Research Results:
Countries and Reponses
10
27 Organisations
from 19 Countries in Europe, including:
• 51,9 % Single Agencies
• 29,6 % Umbrella Structures
• 18,5 % Other Organisations.
12. (II) Research Question
Question 2: Are specialised service providers in your country
involved in ensuring the safety of PwD in cases of disasters?
12
13. (I & II ) Research Result
13
• DPR programmes and procedures do not specifically address the
needs of PwD;
• DPR plans do not usually involve specialised service providers in
their development and implementation
There is a need of rethinking the way in which responsible
institutions at the local and national level involve experts and
specialised service providers in ensuring the safety of PwD in
disaster situations.
14. (III) Research Question
Question 3: Does your organisation provide training to staff on how
to act in cases of natural disasters?
14
15. (III) Research Result
Specialised
service
providers have
the expertise to
assist their
users, but lack
specific training
on how to
support them in
cases of
disaster.
15
16. (IV) Research Question
Question 4: Should specialised service providers be involved in
ensuring the safety of PwD in cases of disasters?
16
17. (IV) Research Result
There is a
demonstrated
willingness and
readiness of
specialised service
providers to
cooperate with all
relevant
stakeholders, in
order to strengthen
their disaster
17
18. Conclusions and
Suggestions
It is necessary to:
• Develop guidelines on PwD for
DPR;
• Mainstream disability into civil
protection plans;
• Provide training, cooperation,
information and rise social
18
The questionnaire assessed:
1) the experience of specialised service providers across Europe in disaster situations and their capability to act in terms of methodology and protocols, trainings and models of good practice (MOGP).
2) specialised service providers’ awareness of national, regional, local and municipal plans for disaster preparedness and response (DPR), specifically dedicated to PwD, as well as the service providers’ involvement in the development and implementation of these plans.
3) service providers’ level of involvement in ensuring the security of PwD in such emergencies and their opinions on their role in this field.
A total of 27 organisations from 19 different European countries took part in the survey.
Organisations range from Single agencies, working directly with PwD, to Umbrella structures which represent the views and realities of service providers for PwD from across their countries.
The research therefore provided a good knowledge-base on the topic from across Europe.
The survey results demonstrate that even though there are programmes and procedures addressing the disaster preparedness and response at local and national levels, they rarely, if at all, address the specific needs of the persons with disabilities.
The figure clearly shows that the specialised service provider organisations, having the knowledge and know-how needed to support in a correct way this target group, are usually not involved in the development and implementation of disaster preparedness and response planning.
In addition to this, when asked about specialised service providers’ involvement in ensuring the safety of PwD in cases of disasters, the majority of the organisations interviewed affirmed not to be involved.
These results indicate the need of rethinking the way in which responsible institutions at the local and national level involve experts and service providers in ensuring the safety of persons with disabilities during and after disasters.
The survey outcomes underline that while service providers do have the expertise to assist their users, usually they are not sufficiently trained on how to support them in case of disaster.
In those cases where these trainings exist, they are provided on topics such as: how to act in case of fire, trauma, accident, and evacuation; on safety of buildings and necessary equipment; on cooperation with local fire departments and technical welfare organisations; on safety of persons and first aid.
The preparedness of specialised service providers is crucial, as it is also their involvement in the elaboration of measures for preventing disasters from happening.
A very important result of the survey is the definite willingness and readiness of specialised service providers to cooperate with all relevant stakeholders, in order to strengthen their disaster preparedness.
Disaster preparedness and response plans should include specific guidelines on supporting persons with disabilities, based on their involvement.
Support for people with disabilities has to be provided in close cooperation with those who have the specific knowledge of their needs and the know-how to meet them.
Civil protection services should mainstream disabilities into their disaster preparedness and response plans.
Organisations need more cooperation, training and knowledge on disaster preparedness and response focusing on supporting persons with disabilities.
Social awareness on the topic needs to be raised. More information needs to be provided by the national governments and local entities in case of disasters.