The document analyzes and compares the post-earthquake public policy responses and their impacts on retailer livelihood recovery in Bam, Iran and Bhuj, India. Interventions are examined at macro, city, and micro levels. At the city level, policies prioritizing speed of reconstruction over integrated land use led to negative impacts. At the micro level, assistance programs mainly benefited landowners and better-off groups, excluding many renters. Livelihood recovery was constrained by housing recovery approaches and uneven distribution of reconstruction resources.
Policy impact and livelihood recovery of retailers in earthquake affected cities
1. The Impacts of Post-disaster Public Policy
responses on livelihood recovery of
retailers in earthquake-affected cities
A comparative study of the reconstruction of Bam and Bhuj
Mojgan Taheri Tafti
PhD Candidate
The University of Melbourne
2. Objective of the research
To develop an
understanding of the
implications of post-
disaster public policy
responses for the
long-term recovery of
urban retailers in two
cities of Bam (Iran)
3. Bam & Bhuj- background
The 2001 Gujarat The 2003 Bam
Earthquake Earthquake
Population: 125,000 Population: 92,000
50% destruction in old 80% destruction in old
districts districts
Death toll: 7,000
Bhuj Death toll: 26,000
Bam
Bhuj
Bam
4. Pre-earthquake condition
• The two cities are small market towns, serving as
administrative centres as well as distributive centres of
goods and services for their urban-region.
• Therefore, retail constitutes a large proportion of
livelihood activities. In Bam 30 % of jobs was in retail
sector. Bhuj Bam
Pre- earthquake retail units 3,148
3,800
Damaged retail units 1,900 (60%) damaged
3,200 (85%) destroyed
5. Recovery programme in the two cities
Bhuj Bam
State Government of Central Government of
Gujarat Iran
Loan from the World Public fund and the
Bank and the ADB World Bank loan
Different
conceptualization of
recovery in public
policy responses
Recovery as a Recovery as the
developmental restitution of the
process lost physical assets.
7. Policies Targeting Recovery at Individual Level
Bhuj Bam
Owner-driven
Policy Cash grant model for
approach the reconstruction
Temporary shops of shops
Temporary shops
A sum lump of 124 1,200 US$ grant
Assistanc
US$ and 62 US$ to 7,000 US$ grant for
e shopkeepers and the reconstruction
cabin owners of each unit.
Beneficiar Shop and cabin
Shop owners
Tenant shopkeepers were excluded from both
ies owners
recovery programmes.
In Bam, tenants retailers accounted for 75%
8. Public policy at micro level:
The policy impacts- Bam
• In Bam, the policy later changed to benefit
landowners. This change mostly benefited middle
income and upper-income groups.
• Construction of many of these new shops left
unfinished due to the inflation rate and the
9000
increase in construction material and the stagnant
8000
property market.
7000
6000
5000
Pre-earthquake
4000 shops
3000
2000 Earthquake
1000 Shop Permit
0
Completed
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Source: Housing Foundation of Iran. Internal report
9. Public policy at micro level:
The policy impacts
Shopkeepers had to entirely rely on their own
assets for achieving recovery.
Bhu
j Consequently, those with no adequate assets
had to shift to labour jobs or their recovery took
Assistance did not play a key role in their
a long time.
livelihood recovery.
Assistance played a role in livelihood recovery of
shop owners
Shop renters had to wait in temporary shops.
Bam Change in the beneficiaries of the policy from
shop owners to land benefited middle-income
and high income landowners
10. Intervention at micro scale:
The impacts of housing reconstruction policies
Bam
• An integrate and flexible programme for
reconstruction of residential and
commercial units.
Bhuj
• Separate programmes
for reconstruction of
residential and
commercial units.
• This resulted in
disappearance of
buildings with mixed
land use: a prevalent
12. Intervention at city scale:
The impacts of Urban Planning - Bam
• New urban plan prescription for widening
the existing roads resulted in a considerable
delay in reconstruction of shops and lengthy
business disruption.
9000
8000
7000
6000 Unfinished
construction
5000
Pre-earthquake
4000
shops
3000
2000 Earthquake
1000 Shop Permit
0
Completed
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Source: Housing Foundation of Iran. Internal report
13. Intervention at city scale:
Urban Planning- Bhuj
• Main Bazaar to be exempted from the
prescription of the development plan of the
city
• The priority was given to the minimum
disruption of the traditional bazaar’s
function.
14. Intervention at city scale:
Urban Planning- Bhuj
• Cut off an average of
half a meter from
each shop.
• The project was
conducted by local
government
involvement and
finished in 40 days
• The bazaar even
more vulnerable
against a future
seismic event.
15. Intervention at city scale:
(Re)construction of commercial centres -Bam
Two projects:
The major
commercial axis of
the city & the
Traditional bazaar.
• Very slow
reconstruction
process.
• Construction of
800 shops almost
entirely with public
funding sources.
• Most of the new
16. Intervention at city scale:
(Re)construction of commercial centres -Bhuj
The local authority undertook a venture with
private developers for construction of a series of
commercial buildings on governmental lands.
2,000 new shops were built.
Slow process of construction, allegations of
corruption.
Given the relatively high price of these shops and
their location on the new relocation sites outside the
city, these shops were mostly bought by non-
stricken retailers and non pre-earthquake
shopkeepers.
17. Intervention at macro scale:
Policy provisions at this level had
important, yet indirect implications for the
livelihood recovery of the stricken retailers.
Bhuj Bam
Economic recovery at the urban-region level
- Incentives for - No policy provision for
industrialization : economic recovery of the
Ten folded increase in district.
industrial units. - Local industrial complex
Boosting the city’s of district- regional centre
- Renovation role as the was closed.
level infrastructure
-New district-level -Some district-level
infrastructure have been infrastructure have not
Impact upon the recovery of retailers rebuilt yet.
built. been
-New developments -Administrative changes :
attracted more city lost its centrality.
investments.
18. Conclusion:
Bhuj
Recovery
Programme
Bam Recovery of the
Recovery
district
Programme - Reconstruction of
the district level
infrastructure
Recover
- Economic revival
y of of the district:
-retailers
Income
agriculture
recovery
revival,…
Recove
-Restitution of
the physical Recovery of ry of
the -Re-
the city
assets
-Socially and
neighbourho establishment
- Minimum
physically of the role of
business od
- Speed of the city in its
disruption
reconstruction urban-region
- physical and
economic
recovery of the
20. Conclusion: of the economic recovery of the urban-
-The importance
region.
- The approach of the public policy responses towards
Macro-
level
recovery:
-Reconstruction of the lost assets vs. Development and
Trade-off between the speed of recovery and improving
modernization.
the built environment.
- Multi-stakeholderofnegotiation in its urban region.
Reestablishment the city role planning process is
City-level
likely to minimize such consequences.
- Direct intervention of the public sector in building new
commercial units was lengthy entwined with allegations
- Public assistance plays a critical role for resumption of
of corruption, and mainly benefited the non-affected
business activities .
Micro
level
groups.
- Defining access to assistance based on tenure leads to
inequitable distribution of resources
21. Interventions at different levels
Bam Bhuj
Macro-
Economic Reconstruction of Rapid
Recovery of damaged Industrialization
the Urban- infrastructure Agriculture &
Reconstructio
Region Repair of Renovation of
local handicraft
n of damaged urban
City-level
infrastructure Infrastructure. infrastructure
Reconstructio (Re)construction (Re)construction
n of trade and of trade and of trade and
service services. service centres
centres Is not finished yet some of the
Touristic spots
Individual NA
Assistance for touristic spots
Assistance for
Micro
New job
livelihood reconstruction of NA
reconstruction of
opportunities
assistance damaged damaged
buildings buildings
22. Intervention at city scale:
Integrated impacts in neighbourhoods- Bhuj
• Small businesses were closed
24. Intervention at city scale:
Integrated impacts in neighbourhoods- Bam
• Neighbourhoods with higher land price are
reconstructed sooner than other areas. In those
neighbourhoods of Bam with slower recovery
process, retailers who could finish the
reconstruction of their shops have not achieved
their recovery, in terms of income and business
Move?
activities.
26. Existing practices of livelihood recovery
• Most literature about
post-disaster
livelihood recovery in
developing countries
are concerned with
rural settlements.
• In practice, post
disaster livelihood
promotion
interventions have
been rather limited
and little
documentation exists
of the design and
27. Public policy at the city level:
The policy impacts
Urban planning must led to a minimum business
disruption for shopkeepers.
Direct intervention of public sector in both
cases benefited those shopkeepers at the
commercial niches of the city.
Direct intervention of the public sector in
building new commercial units was
lengthy, entwined with allegations of
corruption, and mainly benefited the non-
shopkeepers or non-affected shopkeepers.
28.
29. Intervention at city scale:
(Re)construction of commercial centres -Bhuj
• Renovation of the traditional vegetable
bazaar.
After the reconstruction, many pre-earthquake
traders could not afford the higher rent price.
30. II. Assistance distribution and housing
Recovery
• The first priority of the recovery programmes
was to provide housing.
• Assistance distribution to shop owners did not
play a key role in their livelihood recovery.
• Housing and location as
an important factor in access
to livelihood opportunities
• Housing recovery as an
option for livelihood
recovery is not sustainable.
31. Livelihood recovery trajectories- Bam
• Many shopkeepers specially shop renters are still
trading in temporary units.
• Those who were able to rebuild their shops in the
areas with low land price, experiencing reduce in
foot traffic.
• Those who received the assistance for building a
shop were better-off groups (not necessarily pre-
earthquake shopkeepers or local people).
• Construction of many new commercial buildings
have abandoned unfinished.
32. Some observations:
• Livelihood recovery should be addressed
at different levels.
• Disruption of trade played an important
role in livelihood recovery of households.
• Exclusive focus on housing
reconstruction have led to further
poverty of the poor in urban settlements.
• Those benefited from the public sector
projects of building commercial units
were in most cases not genuine victims
or not pre-earthquake shopkeepers.
• Distribution of resources based on the
losses occurred deprived the most in
33. Managerial Economic Trends at
Financial ability to national/state level
assets adjust to Process of decision-
Social new making
assets condition The holistic economy
Political Programmes
policy framework
assets relating to the
Tenure urban-
Neighbourhoo regional role
d recovery of the city
process Livelihood
Demographic recovery
changes considerations
Livelihood for the urban-
Strengthening/
recovery of region
weakening the
neighbour Resource
city’s role at the
retailers distribution
urban-region
level. Reconstructio
Economic n of
recovery of the infrastructure
34. IV. Interventions in commercial units- Bam
• The government rebuilt a number of shops
within the commercial axis of the city using
public funding.
• Very slow reconstruction process.
• The reconstruction of the traditional bazaar
still is not finished yet.
35. Bam & Bhuj
• Formal sector employees, permanent jobs:
Those who were employees of government had the steady source of income
Experienced no impact upon their livelihoods
Have a steady income during the years after the earthquake
Their capability to accumulate or re-accumulate assets especially housing has
significantly enhanced, because of :
access to formal loan sources
the income enabled them to finish the construction of their houses incrementally
Based on the content analysis of the interviews almost all the interviewees in these
groups increased their housing assets.
36. Distribution of resources
• No prerequisite for receiving the subsidized loan for building commercial
units, except for a trading permit and ownership of a plot of land
• Enhanced the capacity of those who had access to assets including
land, financial capital and social/political assets for receiving loans.
• Those with less assets including rental tenure could not receive a loan for
their livelihood recovery. The capability of them to achieve recovery are
constraint
• In areas with lower-income residents, the commercial areas have not been
completely reconstructed, which affected the foot traffic and income of the
shopkeepers
Editor's Notes
Good afternoon. My name is MojganTaheri. I am going to talk about the impacts of public policy responses for the livelihood recovery of retailers in two cities of Bam and Bhuj.
This presentation is a part of my PhD thesis which attempt to develop an understanding of how public policy response mediated households’ capability to recover from disaster-induced impacts. The study draws upon field research conducted in 2011. Methodsemployed are consisting of archival review, in-depth interviews with the residents, decision makers and key informants, as well as observation and onsite mapping. The selection of the two reconstruction experiences were based on their relative similarity in context and the nature of disaster. The objective of this presentation is to develop an understanding of the implications of post-disaster public policy responses for the long-term recovery of urbanretailers in two cities of Bam (Iran) and Bhuj (India).
Just a brief basic information about the two cases. Bam is located on south east of Iran and Bhuj is a ciry in Kutch district, Gujarat state, India. You can see the pre-earthquake population, earthquake impacts in terms of human fatalities and the built environment.
These two cities have been small market towns, serving as administrative centres as well as distributive centres of goods and services for their urban-region. therefore, retail constituted a large proportion of livelihood activities in these cities; in Bam 30 % of jobs (3,050) was in retail sector. You can see the number of pre-earthquake retail units in both cities and the damaged incurred to them in the wake of the earthquake.
The post-earthquake public policy responses in Bam and Bhuj differed in their holistic approaches towards recovery. The vigorous pursuit of economic growth in Gujarat, significantly influenced the recovery programme’s conceptualization of recovery as a developmental process, where development is perceived as economic growth, industrialization, and modernization. On the other side, the economic slowdown in Iran in addition to the geopolitics of the stricken areas left no room for formulating an ambitious recovery programme for Bam. Therefore, recovery was conceptualized as the restitution of the lost physical assets.
Examining the two recovery programmes in this presentation is pursued by looking at a range of policy provisions at three different levels:First I will discuss the policies concerned with the recovery at the micro level. We found that two sets of policies were important: housing reconstruction policies and policies which directly targeted the livelihood recovery of retailers.Then at the city level, I will discuss different policies Urban planning policies, interventions in reconstruction of commercial centres and reconstruction of urban infrastructure and amenities.Finally, I will look at the interventions at the regional level and see their impacts upon livelihood recovery of retailers in these two cities.At the macro level, recovery programme policy provisions had important, yet indirect implications for the livelihood recovery of the stricken retailers. The aforementioned divergence in attitudes of public policy responses in the two countries was influential in economic revival of the two affected regions and cities and hence also the livelihood recovery of retailers. In Gujarat and Kutch district, the ‘developmental’ objectives of the recovery programme were pursued by an array of policies including the renovation of the critical regional infrastructure, introducing incentives for rapid industrialization, and revitalization of agriculture and rural economy. In addition to these attempts, a focus on Bhuj as the administrative centre of Kutch district was associated with an unprecedented investment in urban infrastructure and reconstruction of district-level social infrastructure. These changes attracted more investment in tourist facilities, industry and other sectors, which were influential in revitalization of trade and commerce in Bhuj. Many entrepreneurs in the commercial centre of the city reported reaching their previous levels of income and activities.On the other side, the aforementioned conceptualization of recovery as restitution of the damaged physical assets in Bam led to the neglect of the economic revival of the city and the region. The damages incurred to the 2,500 year old Bam citadel, the city’s major touristic spot, long-term closure of an industrial complex next to the city, and inability of the main economic engine of the region, i.e. date production, to return to its ex-ante state led to the economic decline in city and region. In fact, in Bam events unfolded in the reverse direction compare to Bhuj: some of the regional social infrastructure was not rebuilt and at the same time with redefining the administrative boundaries of the city-region of Bam, the city lost its importance and centrality. This, in addition to other factors at the national level, led to a decline in commercial activities in the city. Even those shopkeepers who could retain their working places in the commercial centre of the city reported their business operation to be well below pre-event profitability.
At micro level, policy provisions for retailers was different in the two cities. The public assistance for retailers in Bhuj consisted of temporary places and a small cash grant. In Bam, public assistance consisted of temporary places for business, payment of a cash grant for starting business activities, and an assistance for reconstruction of damaged shops. The similar theme here was that in both cities the policy excluded tenant retailers from any assistance. This is the problem given that in both cities tenant retailers accounted for a considerable portion of retailers. For instance, in Bam 75% of pre-earthquake shopkeepers were tenants.
In Bam, later the policy have been changed to recognize landowners instead of shop owners eligible for receiving the grant This encouraged developers and high and middle income groups to start building several shops and accumulating new assets. However, because of a high inflation rate many of them abandoned their construction processes unfinished. So as you can see in this figure shows the number of building permits for retail establishments in 2009 is almost as twice as the pre-earthquake number of shops, while the construction of around 45% of them has not been finished yet. Furthermore, returning to the ex-ante condition in terms of the number of shops six years after the earthquake, as shown in this figure has not necessarily led to the recovery of former shopkeepers. The rent of the newly built shops has not been affordable for some of the pre-earthquake shop renters and some of them are still trading in temporary shops provided by the government.
So, what were the implications of these policies for retailers.In Bhuj, thenegligible assistance means that affected retailers had to entirely rely on their own assets for achieving recovery. Consequently, those with no adequate assets had to shift to labour jobs or their recovery took a long time.The assistance did not play a role in their livelihood recovery. In Bam, assistance play a role in the reconstruction of damaged shops.
Another sets of policies at the individual level, as I discussed, was housing reconstruction policies. In Bhuj what happened was that housing assistance was granted exclusively for building residential units. This resulted in disappearance of a prevalent typology of housing with shops on their ground floor from the old fabric of the city. In Bam, on the contrary, the owner-driven reconstruction policies provided more flexibility in construction of building with mixed land-uses.
Now I am going to talk about policies and interventions at the city level.
both cities prepared a new urban development plan for the city after the earthquake. In Bam, the new plan prescription was an in-situ reconstruction, keeping the existing boundaries of the city and widening the existing roads. This policy has been implemented and resulted in a considerable delay in reconstruction of shops and lengthy business disruption. In fact as you can in this graph the reconstruction of retail establishments practically started three years after the earthquake. Given the double-digit inflation in the country, this late start led to further delays. Literature shows that length of the business disruption will led to a late livelihood recovery.
On the other side, in Bhuj, widening the existing roads’ proposal was vehemently objected by major merchants and traders in the main trade centres of the city. So the policy has been implemented in neighbourhoods, but the main commercial centre of the city was exempted from the prescription of the development plan of the city.
so, a compromise has been made to cut off just half a meter from each shop. The project was conducted by local government involvement and finished in 40 days so the business disruption was minimized for these shopkeepers. This, however, left the bazaar even more vulnerable against a future seismic event.
The second issue in recovery programmes intervention at the city level was construction or reconstruction of the commercial centres. In Bam, two projects were by the direct intervention of the public sector; one on the major commercial axis of the city and another one in the city traditional bazaar. you can see in this map. The construction of these two projects took a long time . In general, public sector has built more than 800 shops in the commercial centre of the city almost entirely by public funding sources. The rebuilt shops, however, were mainly rented out or sold by their owners to the non-affected migrants who could afford the high rent of the new shops.
In Bhuj the local authority undertook a venture with private developers for construction of a series of commercial buildings on governmental lands. However, given the relatively high price of these shops and the location of some of them in new relocation sites outside the city, these shops were mostly bought by the better-off for investment purposes. These shopping centres started practically functioning eight to nine years after the earthquake. The process therefore was lengthy again and there were allegation of corruption.In Bhuj, 1000 new shops have been built through public private partnership in governmental land and by the investment of private sector. These shops are not affordable for many pre-earthquake shopkeepers. Also in many cases, the location of these shops in relocation sites was prohibiting. Therefore, many of those who bought a shop in these new centres were not genuine victims or even pre-earthquake shopkeepers. In Bam, the reconstruction of shops in the commercial district of the city has been done or is under-construction by the public sector. Apart from the issue of equality in resource distribution between shop owners in this area and those in other neighbourhoods, many of these shops have been bought by the better-off and migrants.
At the macro level, Due to a symbiotic relation between these cities and their urban-regions, the economic recovery of the city depend on the economic recovery of the urban-region as well as the re-establishment of the role of the city in its urban-region. In Bhuj economic growth in Kutch district through different programmes on one side and the reestablishment of the city role by building new district level infrastructure on the other led to the revitalization of trade and commerce in the city. Almost all interviewees who get back to their business in the commercial centre of the city reported reaching their previous levels of income and activities.On the other side, in Bam the economic revival of the city and the region was largely neglected in the recovery programme. The city lost its centrality and the district lost one of its economic engines. This led to a decline in commercial activities in the city. Even those shopkeeper interviewees who could retain their working places in the commercial centre of the city reported that they have not yet achieved their pre-earthquake income level.
To sum up,- Looking at policy provisions at the macro level demonstrated the importance of an integrated policy consideration for recovery at different levels. At the city level, looking at the implication of urban planning policies for reconstruction shows that ambitious interventions normally leads to a significant business disruption and delay in urban recovery as a whole. literature provides extensive evidence that the length of business disruption has detrimental impacts upon livelihood recovery of shopkeepers and business owners . Therefore some trade-off between these objectives needs to be made. Multi-stakeholder negotiation and deliberation in planning process is likely to minimize such consequences. - The other common theme in both cases was that the direct intervention of the public sector in construction or reconstruction of commercial centers and the business niches in the two cities were politically motivated and favoured the business elites. Moreover, these direct interventions in both cases were lengthy and coupled with allegation of corruption. Finally, the main beneficiaries of these projects were not genuine victims or even pre-earthquake shopkeepers.-In regards with the livelihood recovery of retailers at individual level, the nature of assistance and definition of the beneficiaries need more attention in policy formulation. In Bam, the nature of assistance and the definition of the policy beneficiaries, led to the accumulation of new assets for the better-offs. In Bhuj, public policy did not incorporate any considerable assistance for supporting the stricken retailers.The other issue observed in both cases, defining the access to assistance based on tenure deprived the pre-earthquake tenant shopkeepers from any recovery assistance and support. In the absence of access to finance for low-income shopkeepers in both cities, many small retailers lost their businesses. Generally speaking, those who need most support for their livelihood recovery were bypassed by the policy.Current policy recommendations by international development institutions have traditionally rurally-focused origins and do not capture the complexities embedded in recovery process in urban settlements. Addressing challenges such as variety of tenure and livelihood arrangements as well as buildings with mixed land-uses and mixed tenure in these settlements needs more sophisticated policy responses, formulated through participation of all stakeholders, in the face of disastrous events.
o the presentation compares and contrasts these policies at three different scales: micro scale which targets recovery of individuals, city scale which addresses livelihood and economic recovery at the city level, and finally macro scale which is concerned with economic recovery at the district level. At the micro scale these policies were mainly concerned with the reconstruction of the damaged buildings. As you have noticed interventions including micro-finance were not incorporated in the recovery programme in cities, while we had these sorts of interventions in affected rural areas. at the city level which policies addressed livelihood and economic recovery at this scale; in can include reconstruction of infrastructure which is critical for businesses in resumption of their activities, etc and finally macro scale which is concerned with economic recovery at the district level. These policies had direct and indirect implications for livelihood recovery of shopkeepers in these two cities.This table illustrates what happened during the years following the earthquake at different levels.Due to a symbiotic relation between these cities and their urban-regions, the economic recovery of the city depend on the economic recovery of the urban-region and secondly, as well as the re-establishment of the role of the city in its urban-region. At the urban-region level in Bam despite the attempts of international and local organizations, the agriculture sector, already suffered from a long-term drought, has been experiencing a decline following the earthquake. This has affected Bammi people whose livelihoods were dependent to date-related enterprise including date trade, storage, and packaging.In Bhuj and in Kutch, the industrial incentive schemes resulted in a ten-folded increase in the number of medium and large industrial units in the district. The economic revival of rural settlements, especially in agriculture and handicraft sectors have also been pursued by public sector and local and international NGOs. Different strategies have been employed for revival of this sector including a revolving fund, subsidized loan scheme for self-employed groups and cottage industries. Bhuj was the trade centre for the products of traditional handicrafts especially to tourists and visitors.In Gujarat, newly built or reconstructed higher level social infrastructure for the district has been established in Bhuj. For instance, reconstruction of the ‘district’ hospital, Kutch university, renovated airport all are serving the population of the whole district and reinforced the central role of the city. This re-establishment can be related to the recovery process in the city, including restitution of services that it was offering to its urban-region.In contrast, Bam experienced a decline and weakening in its centrality for its urban-region during the years following the earthquake. First of all, due to the decisions made during the years following the earthquake, the administrative urban-region of Bam has been diminished and some parts of it have been separated. Also many social infrastructure has not been rebuild yet including the city hospital. This changes impacted the number of visitors to the city and hence the trade and market. At the city level a significant portion of the finance related to the component of recovery in urban settlements was directed to renovation of infrastructures of. In Bam, many critical infrastructure have been rebuilt and repaired and some of them are yet to be finished.At this level also reconstruction of trade centres was very important which will be discussed in more detail. At the city level, no initiative have been launched by the public sector or NGOs to provide new livelihood opportunities within the cities. However, in case of Bhuj changes occurred at the district level attracted investments from the private sector, for instance the establishment of two new hotels, new bank branches have contributed to the economic recovery of Bhuj. Also social infrastructure established by NGOs or other institutions provided some job opportunities for the middle income and educated groups. New industrial establishments, however, in most cases attracted the influx of migrants from the neighbour states which added to the slum areas in and around the city. In Bam, due to the narrow conceptualization of recovery as physical reconstruction process, no initiative with the aim of job creation has not been set up. Even worse, As a result of the economic decline in the country, exacerbated by the multinational sanctions, the famous car factory of the city which was not affected by the earthquake and employed 16% of the work force in the city before the earthquake faced a long-term closure. Now, Bam has the highest rate of unemployment in the province. linking micro-realities with meso or macro policy levels is that so many of the key contextual issues affecting poor men’s and women’s access to assets and livelihoods strategiesAt the micro level, public assistance for livelihood recovery of individuals. In both cases assistance was allocated for recovery of business owners. The assistance was a combination of grant and loans. Just one other group of individuals in cities were received public assistance and they were retailers. I will talk about the nature of this assistance and its impact upon livelihood recovery of this group.Two other sets of policies also affected the recovery of shopkeepers; urban plan of the city and housing assistance policies. Both cities adopted a new urban development plan after the disaster.
Well, what were the impacts of these recovery programme components on the earthquake-affected households in these two cities. In Bhuj, due to the small assistance many shopkeepers with marginal assets were not able to reconstruct their shops and shifted to labour jobs. Among these assets, social assets, financial assets, and human asset in terms of managerial ability of the business owner to seek new strategies As it has been mentioned before many small shops within the old fabric of the city have been disappeared..those who remained within the old fabric lost their costumers due to relocation of considerable population.Due to the economic growth in the urban-region, however, many of those who were able to return to trade , have experienced income recovery or boost.Those who with less job disruption have experienced income recovery or boost.
Move?
Analysing the data gathered on households’ recovery in Bam and Bhuj demonstrates that different interacting factors playing out at different spatial-temporal scales have been deeply influential in shaping the recovery paths of different affected households. It shows that the livelihood recovery of households needs to be addressed at different levels.Due to a symbiotic relation between these cities and their urban-regions, the economic recovery of the city depend on the economic recovery of the urban-region and secondly, as well as the re-establishment of the role of the city in its urban-region. At the urban-region level in Bam despite the attempts of international and local organizations, the agriculture sector, already suffered from a long-term drought, has been experiencing a decline following the earthquake. This has affected Bammi people whose livelihoods were dependent to date-related enterprise including date trade, storage, and packaging.In Bhuj and in Kutch, the industrial incentive schemes resulted in a ten-folded increase in the number of medium and large industrial units in the district. The economic revival of rural settlements, especially in agriculture and handicraft sectors have also been pursued by public sector and local and international NGOs. Different strategies have been employed for revival of this sector including a revolving fund, subsidized loan scheme for self-employed groups and cottage industries. Bhuj was the trade centre for the products of traditional handicrafts especially to tourists and visitors.In Gujarat, newly built or reconstructed higher level social infrastructure for the district has been established in Bhuj. For instance, reconstruction of the ‘district’ hospital, Kutch university, renovated airport all are serving the population of the whole district and reinforced the central role of the city. This re-establishment can be related to the recovery process in the city, including restitution of services that it was offering to its urban-region.In contrast, Bam experienced a decline and weakening in its centrality for its urban-region during the years following the earthquake. First of all, due to the decisions made during the years following the earthquake, the administrative urban-region of Bam has been diminished and some parts of it have been separated. Also many social infrastructure has not been rebuild yet including the city hospital. This changes impacted the number of visitors to the city and hence the trade and market. At the city level a significant portion of the finance related to the component of recovery in urban settlements was directed to renovation of infrastructures of. In Bam, many critical infrastructure have been rebuilt and repaired and some of them are yet to be finished.At this level also reconstruction of trade centres was very important which will be discussed in more detail. At the city level, no initiative have been launched by the public sector or NGOs to provide new livelihood opportunities within the cities. However, in case of Bhuj changes occurred at the district level attracted investments from the private sector, for instance the establishment of two new hotels, new bank branches have contributed to the economic recovery of Bhuj. Also social infrastructure established by NGOs or other institutions provided some job opportunities for the middle income and educated groups. New industrial establishments, however, in most cases attracted the influx of migrants from the neighbour states which added to the slum areas in and around the city. In Bam, due to the narrow conceptualization of recovery as physical reconstruction process, no initiative with the aim of job creation has not been set up. Even worse, As a result of the economic decline in the country, exacerbated by the multinational sanctions, the famous car factory of the city which was not affected by the earthquake and employed 16% of the work force in the city before the earthquake faced a long-term closure. Now, Bam has the highest rate of unemployment in the province.
literature provides little guidance on which policies are most effective in livelihood recovery in cities affected by disasters. In 2010, the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in its guidance note on livelihood recovery mentions that “In practice, post disaster livelihood promotion interventions have been rather limited and little documentation exists of the design and impacts of these efforts” (2010: 34). Moreover, current academic research on post-disaster livelihood recovery in the context of developing countries are mainly concerned with rural settlements .In cities, however, post disaster livelihood recovery is of more importance as income is a means for accessing basic resources including food, water and shelter. This study, therefore, seeks to contribute to the existing knowledge on long-term livelihood recovery in disaster affected cities in developing countries. (not good)
in general, there is a trade-off between using the opportunity provided by the earthquake for improving the urban built environment and the time of the recovery process. The length of the business disruption would impede the recovery of retailers. So in urban planning after the earthquake realistic timeframes are very important factor. The other common theme in both cases was that the direct intervention of the public sector in construction or reconstruction of commercial centers and the business niches in the two cities were politically motivated and favoured the business elites. Moreover, these direct interventions in both cases were lengthy and coupled with allegtion of corruption. Finally, the main beneficiaries of these projects were not genuine victims or even pre-earthquake shopkeepers.
Also the local authority directly intervened in the reconstruction and repair of the thriving market street of the city.
The second impact of the recovery programme on the livelihood recovery of people was related to distribution of resources and policies related to housing recovery.First of all, the limited assistance allocated to shop owners in Bhuj did not play a role in their livelihood recovery. In Bam also, although the amount of assistance was as bigger as 20 times of that in Bhuj, it did not play a role in livelihood recovery of many shopkeepers as 75% of them were tenant and therefore, were deprived from receiving assistance.The first priority of the recovery programmes in resource distribution in both cases was housing which could not be spent for other purposes.More importantly , in Bhuj housing recovery programme led to relocation of low income households which affected their access to livelihood opportunities and daily costs.
In Bam, due to the aforementioned problems as well as a rampant inflation in the country many shopkeepers were not able to rebuild their shops and are still trading in temporary units.Those who were able to rebuild their shops in the areas with low land price, experiencing reduce in foot traffic, as their neighbours were not able to finish reconstruction of their shops.The assistance for shop construction has been mainly absorbed by the better-off or migrant ( and not necessarily pre-earthquake shopkeepers).Construction of many new commercial buildings have abandoned unfinished.
Like other disasters “capital-intensive livelihoods before the disaster received larger grants”.
Political capital is defined broadly… as the ability to use power in support of political or economicpositions and so enhance livelihoods; it refers to both the legitimate distribution of rights and power as well as the illicit operation of power