1 3 May 2018
Risks from soil
pollution and
Food safety
- State of art -
Frank A. SwartjesThe Global Symposium on Soil
Pollution | GSOP18, 2-4 Mai 2018, Rome
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations)
3 May 20182
OUTLINE
 Introduction
 Human health RA
(Incl Food safety)
 Bottom line
40 YEARS OF GETTING USED TO IT
3 May 20183
RISK???!!!!!!
17 April 20184
5 3 May 2018
19 out of 28
EU Member
States:
risk-based
SSVs
Risk-
based
SSVs
=
3 May 20186
OUTLINE
 Introduction
 Human health RA
(incl. Food safety)
 Bottom line
3 May 20187
EXPOSURE FROM SOILS
Oral
Dermal
Inhalation
3 May 20188
BIOMONITORING

 Blood
 Urine
 Hair
 Nails
 Exhaled breath
 Skin tissue
 Health monitoring program
3 May 20189
EXPOSURE CALCULATIONS

 Several exposure models available
 Basically same structure
 Different boundary conditions and input
parameters
10
CLEA
NoName
France
NoName Sweden
Risk-net
S-Risk
JAGG
CSOIL
UMS
LUR
‘Beregningsverktøyme’
3 May 201811
LEVEL PLAYING FIELD?
VEGETBALE CONSUMPTION
Exposure adults (mg/ kgBW/day):
x 106 (left) / x 104(right)
0
1000
2000
3000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Cd, Res, clay, stand. inputs
0
20
40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Benzene, Res, sand, m.-sp. inputs
3 May 2018
INDOOR AIR INHALATION
Exposure adults (mg/ kgBW/day):
Log transformed
3 May 2018
Pathways Routes of exposure
Soil > Outdoor Outdoor: soil ingestion
Outdoor: dermal exposure to soil
Outdoor: inhalation of soil vapors
Outdoor: inhalation of soil derived dust
Outdoor: inhalation of volatilized irrigation water
Soil > Indoor Indoor: dust ingestion
Indoor: dermal exposure to soil derived dust
Indoor: inhalation of soil originated vapors
Indoor: inhalation of volatilized domestic water
Soil > Diet Res. diet: uptake of homegrown vegetables
Res. diet: Ingestion of soil attached to vegetables
Res. diet: uptake of homegrown fruits
Res. diet: ingestion of soil attached to fruits
Res. diet: consumption of meat
Res. diet: consumption of diary products
Groundwater Resident diet: consumption of groundwater
Indoor: inhalation of groundwater vapors
Showering
Irrigation
Surface water dermal contact surface water (swimming)
ingestion surface water (swimming
ingestion suspended matter (swimming)
Surface water consumption of fish and shellfish
EXPOSURE PATHWAYS
(Carlon and
Swartjes, 2007)
SOIL INGESTION RATES
 Children: consensus
 Adults: some debate
3 May 2018
beetroot
potato
leek
onion
r&wcabbage
frenchbeans
tomato
endive
lettuce
cauliflower
carrot
radish
spinach
total
As
Ni
Pb
Cu
Hg
Zn
Cd
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
BCF
crop
Metal
BCF-values based on geometrical mean
As
Ni
Pb
Cu
Hg
Zn
Cd
BCF VALUES METALS
3 May 2018
6 December 201717
BCFs RIVM DATASET Cu (n = 46)
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45

 Potatoes, cauliflower, cabbage, carrot, lettuce,
beans
 pH = 4.9 – 8.4; %OM = 0.19-0.57
MECHANISTIC:
THREE STEP PROCEDURE
Speciation in soil
Effective
Pore water
concentration
Plant root
uptake
Concentration
plant
roots
Transport within
the plant
Concentration
edible plant
parts
Total
soil
concentration
REPRESENTATIVE CONCENTRATION
IN CROP
Take into account:
 Type of crop
 Soil properties
 Consumption rate-weighting
3 May 2018
FREUNDLICH-TYPE EQUATIONS
 Cd / Zn << Pb / Cu
 Problematic for As / Co
3 May 2018
As SOIL VERSUS CROP
3 May 201821
EXPOSURE DUE TO INHALATION
INDOOR AIR /
CONCEPTUAL MODEL (US EPA, 2017)
27 March 2017
3 May 201823
EXPOSURE DUE TO INHALATION
INDOOR AIR / PROCESSES
 Convection and diffusion in
groundwater and soil air
 Sorption
 Intrusion into buildings
 Ventilation
 Degradation
 Complicated/ Relatively
unreliable
3 May 201824
RESEARCH
 Abreu & Johnson (2005/2006):
position of groundwater plume/
diffusion obstacles
(α 2-5 OoM 20 m shift)
 Picone (2012):
Distribution of water in soil profile
(oxygen supply)/ degradation
(several OoM)
3 May 201825
RESEARCH
 Provoost (2013).
Henry coefficient: overestimation
 Verginelli and Baciocchi (2014).
Vertical exclusion distance:
distance from the source, above
which the potential for vapor
intrusion can be considered
negligible
3 May 201826
VALIDATION STUDY VAPOR
INTRUSION MODELS – INDOOR AIR
Provoost et al., 2009
CRITICAL EXPOSURE
 Threshold compounds
 non-carcinogens
 non-genotoxic carcinogens
 Non-threshold compounds
 genotoxic carcinogens
Distinction for calculation of critical exposure:
3 May 2018
3 May 201828
OUTLINE
 Introduction
 Human health RA
 Bottom line
22 May 201429
KEY MESSAGE
 Many sophisticated Risk
Assessment Tools in the EU
 Substantial differences in appraisal
ACTING SMART
 Multiple lines of evidence
 Combination between calculations and
measurements (contact media)
 Tiered approaches
 Experience & creativity
3 May 2018
KNOWLEGDE EVOLUTION HH RA
3 May 2018
3 May 201832
POLICY DECISIONS
 Protection targets? Ecology?
 Conservative? Central tendency? Reasonable
Maximal Exposure?
 Access cancer: 10-4 - 10-6 lifelong exposed
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF
LOCAL CONDITIONS
 Groundwater tables/ design houses VERSUS
risk of indoor air inhalation
 Vegetable uptake under tropical conditions
(Jing et al., 2017; SW China)
(Dos Santos et al., 2018; Sao Paulo)
 Geophagy in South Africa
(e.g., Eijsackers al. 2015)
3 May 2018
HARMONIZATION
 One set of SSVs? No!!
 The same blueprint? No!
  Toolbox, including
 standardised tools
 flexible tools
3 May 2018
FLEXIBLE TOOLS
Accounting for differences in:
 Geography
 Cultural/ social aspects
 Policy / decision making
3 May 2018
3 May 201836
Colleagues at GSOP:
THANK YOU
for your
ATTENTION !
→ frank.swartjes@rivm.nl
www.RIVM.NL
LINKED IN GROUP EXPOSURE
27 March 2017
Human exposure from contaminated soil,
groundwater and sediments
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/8341261

Soil pollution and food safety

  • 1.
    1 3 May2018 Risks from soil pollution and Food safety - State of art - Frank A. SwartjesThe Global Symposium on Soil Pollution | GSOP18, 2-4 Mai 2018, Rome FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)
  • 2.
    3 May 20182 OUTLINE Introduction  Human health RA (Incl Food safety)  Bottom line
  • 3.
    40 YEARS OFGETTING USED TO IT 3 May 20183
  • 4.
  • 5.
    5 3 May2018 19 out of 28 EU Member States: risk-based SSVs Risk- based SSVs =
  • 6.
    3 May 20186 OUTLINE Introduction  Human health RA (incl. Food safety)  Bottom line
  • 7.
    3 May 20187 EXPOSUREFROM SOILS Oral Dermal Inhalation
  • 8.
    3 May 20188 BIOMONITORING  Blood  Urine  Hair  Nails  Exhaled breath  Skin tissue  Health monitoring program
  • 9.
    3 May 20189 EXPOSURECALCULATIONS   Several exposure models available  Basically same structure  Different boundary conditions and input parameters
  • 10.
  • 11.
    3 May 201811 LEVELPLAYING FIELD?
  • 12.
    VEGETBALE CONSUMPTION Exposure adults(mg/ kgBW/day): x 106 (left) / x 104(right) 0 1000 2000 3000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Cd, Res, clay, stand. inputs 0 20 40 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Benzene, Res, sand, m.-sp. inputs 3 May 2018
  • 13.
    INDOOR AIR INHALATION Exposureadults (mg/ kgBW/day): Log transformed 3 May 2018
  • 14.
    Pathways Routes ofexposure Soil > Outdoor Outdoor: soil ingestion Outdoor: dermal exposure to soil Outdoor: inhalation of soil vapors Outdoor: inhalation of soil derived dust Outdoor: inhalation of volatilized irrigation water Soil > Indoor Indoor: dust ingestion Indoor: dermal exposure to soil derived dust Indoor: inhalation of soil originated vapors Indoor: inhalation of volatilized domestic water Soil > Diet Res. diet: uptake of homegrown vegetables Res. diet: Ingestion of soil attached to vegetables Res. diet: uptake of homegrown fruits Res. diet: ingestion of soil attached to fruits Res. diet: consumption of meat Res. diet: consumption of diary products Groundwater Resident diet: consumption of groundwater Indoor: inhalation of groundwater vapors Showering Irrigation Surface water dermal contact surface water (swimming) ingestion surface water (swimming ingestion suspended matter (swimming) Surface water consumption of fish and shellfish EXPOSURE PATHWAYS (Carlon and Swartjes, 2007)
  • 15.
    SOIL INGESTION RATES Children: consensus  Adults: some debate 3 May 2018
  • 16.
  • 17.
    6 December 201717 BCFsRIVM DATASET Cu (n = 46) 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45   Potatoes, cauliflower, cabbage, carrot, lettuce, beans  pH = 4.9 – 8.4; %OM = 0.19-0.57
  • 18.
    MECHANISTIC: THREE STEP PROCEDURE Speciationin soil Effective Pore water concentration Plant root uptake Concentration plant roots Transport within the plant Concentration edible plant parts Total soil concentration
  • 19.
    REPRESENTATIVE CONCENTRATION IN CROP Takeinto account:  Type of crop  Soil properties  Consumption rate-weighting 3 May 2018
  • 20.
    FREUNDLICH-TYPE EQUATIONS  Cd/ Zn << Pb / Cu  Problematic for As / Co 3 May 2018
  • 21.
    As SOIL VERSUSCROP 3 May 201821
  • 22.
    EXPOSURE DUE TOINHALATION INDOOR AIR / CONCEPTUAL MODEL (US EPA, 2017) 27 March 2017
  • 23.
    3 May 201823 EXPOSUREDUE TO INHALATION INDOOR AIR / PROCESSES  Convection and diffusion in groundwater and soil air  Sorption  Intrusion into buildings  Ventilation  Degradation  Complicated/ Relatively unreliable
  • 24.
    3 May 201824 RESEARCH Abreu & Johnson (2005/2006): position of groundwater plume/ diffusion obstacles (α 2-5 OoM 20 m shift)  Picone (2012): Distribution of water in soil profile (oxygen supply)/ degradation (several OoM)
  • 25.
    3 May 201825 RESEARCH Provoost (2013). Henry coefficient: overestimation  Verginelli and Baciocchi (2014). Vertical exclusion distance: distance from the source, above which the potential for vapor intrusion can be considered negligible
  • 26.
    3 May 201826 VALIDATIONSTUDY VAPOR INTRUSION MODELS – INDOOR AIR Provoost et al., 2009
  • 27.
    CRITICAL EXPOSURE  Thresholdcompounds  non-carcinogens  non-genotoxic carcinogens  Non-threshold compounds  genotoxic carcinogens Distinction for calculation of critical exposure: 3 May 2018
  • 28.
    3 May 201828 OUTLINE Introduction  Human health RA  Bottom line
  • 29.
    22 May 201429 KEYMESSAGE  Many sophisticated Risk Assessment Tools in the EU  Substantial differences in appraisal
  • 30.
    ACTING SMART  Multiplelines of evidence  Combination between calculations and measurements (contact media)  Tiered approaches  Experience & creativity 3 May 2018
  • 31.
  • 32.
    3 May 201832 POLICYDECISIONS  Protection targets? Ecology?  Conservative? Central tendency? Reasonable Maximal Exposure?  Access cancer: 10-4 - 10-6 lifelong exposed
  • 33.
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LOCAL CONDITIONS Groundwater tables/ design houses VERSUS risk of indoor air inhalation  Vegetable uptake under tropical conditions (Jing et al., 2017; SW China) (Dos Santos et al., 2018; Sao Paulo)  Geophagy in South Africa (e.g., Eijsackers al. 2015) 3 May 2018
  • 34.
    HARMONIZATION  One setof SSVs? No!!  The same blueprint? No!   Toolbox, including  standardised tools  flexible tools 3 May 2018
  • 35.
    FLEXIBLE TOOLS Accounting fordifferences in:  Geography  Cultural/ social aspects  Policy / decision making 3 May 2018
  • 36.
    3 May 201836 Colleaguesat GSOP: THANK YOU for your ATTENTION ! → frank.swartjes@rivm.nl www.RIVM.NL
  • 37.
    LINKED IN GROUPEXPOSURE 27 March 2017 Human exposure from contaminated soil, groundwater and sediments https://www.linkedin.com/groups/8341261