This powerpoint presents findings from a research project funded by NTU's School of Education. The research compared how three different groups, pupils, D&T teachers and senior elders, valued the subject of D&T. It used previous work by Alison Hardy to compare their values.
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
What do year 9 pupils, d&t teachers and senior leaders think of d&t
1. What do year 9 pupils, D&T teachers
and senior leaders think of D&T?
Alison Hardy: NTU
Kaylie Gyekye: Emmanuel School
Claire Wainwright: Kimberley School
4. Value of D&T
A value is ‘a standard or criterion for guiding
action, for developing and maintaining attitudes
toward relevant objects and situations’ (Rokeach
1968, p.160)
Theoretical framework (Hardy 2013) created
from interviews with experts and analysing
written documents from trainee teachers:
• 22 value statement
5. Method
• Two partnership schools: city & county
• Fourteen interviews
• Active interviews, transcribed.
• First coding (Saldana 2013): values
• Second coding: Hardy (2013) D&T values framework
• Intercoder reliability
Stakeholder group Upton School Emmanuel School
Senior leaders (SLT) 2 2
D&T teachers 5 2
Y9 pupils 5 8
8. Upton cf. St John’s: Pupils
D&T has these values for both groups of pupils:
3 Empowers society to act to improve the world
4 Personal ownership of decisions and actions
5 Learning of vocational skills and techniques that open doors to a range of careers
6 Using raw materials to make a product
11 Alternative to academic subjects
13 Activity of designing
18 Provides a practical purpose for other school subjects
19 Examination and questioning of the made world
22 Learn practical life skills
Pupils do not hold these values of D&T :
1 Meaningful activity of solving real problems with real solutions
7 Designing for future needs and opportunities
9 Freedom to take risks and experiment
12 Identifying problems to be solved
14 Helps the understanding of human beings' position and existence in
the world
9. Upton cf. St John’s: Pupils
D&T has these values for both groups of pupils:
3 Empowers society to act to improve the world
4 Personal ownership of decisions and actions
5 Learning of vocational skills and techniques that open doors to a range of careers
6 Using raw materials to make a product
11 Alternative to academic subjects
13 Activity of designing
18 Provides a practical purpose for other school subjects
19 Examination and questioning of the made world
22 Learn practical life skills
Pupils do not hold these values of D&T :
1 Meaningful activity of solving real problems with real solutions
7 Designing for future needs and opportunities
9 Freedom to take risks and experiment
12 Identifying problems to be solved
14 Helps the understanding of human beings' position and existence in
the world
16. Findings & implications for Claire
• Personal
• Developing practice
– Classroom
– Planning
• Department philosophy
• Agreement between pupils and D&T teachers,
dichotomy between D&T stakeholders and SLT.
17. Findings & implications for Kaylie
• The values held by SLT and D&T are identical
• Values dichotomy between pupils and all
teachers
• Practical life skills is one of the strongest
values held – why is that?
• Understanding colleagues’ perspectives
18. Findings & implications
• No one thinks D&T involves ‘identifying
problems to be solved’
• Parents’ views of D&T: 4 respondents
• Challenges for the future of D&T’s history: life
skills, craft for the daft, supports other
subjects – its not a gatekeeper
19. Conclusions & what next?
School
• Changes to schemes of work
• Presentation of D&T in published school
material
Personal
Wider view
• What’s wrong with D&T being about life skills
• Modifications to theoretical framework
20. References
Hardy, A., 2013. Starting the Journey: Discovering the Point of D&T. In:
PATT27: Technology Education for the Future: A Play on Sustainability,
Christchurch, New Zealand, University of Waikato: Technology
Environmental Science and Mathematics Education research Centre., .
Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R. and Wood, D.J., 1997. Toward a theory of
stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who
and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22 (4), 853-
886.
Rokeach, M., 1968. Beliefs, attitudes and values: a theory of
organization and change. San Francisco: San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Saldaña, J., 2012. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
21. This work was created by Alison Hardy, Kaylie Gyekye and Claire
Wainwright, funded by the NTU’s School of Education Small Scale
Research Project. It used work previously published by Alison
Hardy, which can be found at:
http://www.iteaconnect.org/Conference/PATT/PATT27/PATT27pr
oceedingsNZDec2013.pdf
This work is licensed under the Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
To view a copy of this license visit:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Editor's Notes
Kaylie
All pupils from Upton school compared with St Johns – red squares show the values of pupils from both schools, and the blank squares show the values that were not mentioned during the interviews .
Asking pupils about their values is an unusual thing to do and could have implications.
Students were shown photographs to prompt some of the discussion and teacher present in the room which could impact on what is said