This document discusses how colleges and universities can improve their web pages for academic programs. It provides five reasons why program pages are important: 1) they are the top priority for prospective students; 2) programs are the core products that colleges offer; 3) college is expensive so pages need to demonstrate value; 4) Google is directing targeted searches to these pages; 5) these pages appeal to focused students. It then provides seven ideas for developing and rolling out new program pages, such as assembling a team, piloting select programs, doing a competitive analysis, and testing pages with students.
1. GET WITH THE
How colleges and universities can provide better
major, minor, degree, and certificate information on the web
PROGRAM
Doug Gapinski of mStoner
7. #heweb14
What are some of the best program pages
(degrees, minors, concentrations,
or certificates) you’ve seen?
8. Five reasons why program pages matter
When is a prospective student not a
prospective student?
Great examples
Kicking off your very own program page
redux initiative
10. 1Program listings are the top priority for
prospective students – according to them!
11. 0%
7.5%
15.0%
22.5%
30.0%
Academic program/ major listing Cost Academic program/ majors details Financial aid Scholarships Enrollment/ admissions information Housing details
Students Parents
First content targets on
college and university websites
Source: Noel-Levitz
12. How can you demonstrate value?
29%
22%
16%
18%
4%
33%
25%
32%
6% 5%
Academic program content Testimonials Statistics (job placement/grad schools) Videos Calculators
Seniors
Parents
How can colleges and universities
demonstrate value?
Source: Noel-Levitz
24. The average cost (tuition and fees) of one year of
college as an undergraduate in 2013–2014:
$30,094 – private colleges & universities
$22,203 – public universities, out-of-state
$8,893 – public universities, in-state
Source: Collegeboard
25. For four years:
$120,376 – private colleges & universities
$88,812 – public universities, out-of-state
$35,572 – public universities, in-state
Note: financial aid, inflation, average time to complete (about 55 months and variable
based on type of institution) aren’t calculated into the numbers above.
Source: Collegeboard
26. m
• Ranked #1 liberal arts college in the nation
• 17% acceptance rate
• $46,600 per year (tuition and fees)
• Economics is their most popular program
(major for 19% of undergraduate students)
Source
27. m
Does this page looks like it demonstrates the value
of a $186,400 product?
28. m
• Very little information for a
prospective student
• Majority of page describes
functional requirements for
current students
• References to class of 2007
and 2008
• No links to apply, request
information, or visit
• 20% of visual real estate
goes to an empty events feed
29. m
• Very little information for a
prospective student
• Majority of page describes
functional requirements for
current students
• References to class of 2007
and 2008
• No links to apply, request
information, or visit
• 20% of visual real estate
goes to an empty events feed
31. Because Google is handing you targeted leads
that don’t come through your home page or your
admissions pages.
32. This is the average number of monthly searches for “best college” in Seattle Washington.
33. This is the average number of monthly searches for “computer science degree”
and related terms in Seattle Washington – as reported by Google AdWords.
34. A single specific program search is generating almost 2x the number of leads as a
generic college search. What are they gonna see when they click your program?
36. Program pages have huge potential for
appealing to high-ability students, focused
leads, and/or stealth applicants.
37. The homepage:
an all-purpose Swiss Army
Knife for millions of visitors per
year.
The program page:
a state-of-the-art surgeon’s tool
designed for a few thousand
visitors per year who are
investigating a specific product.
38. When is a prospective student not a
prospective student?
44. In the US, the national transfer rate across all
institution types is 32.9% for full-time students
and 33.9% for part time students.
Source: the Chronicle of Higher Education
45. undecided / undeclared students,
current student who will change majors,
and transfer students
are current students but they are
still shopping for a program
cürr-spéc-tiv
56. What makes a great program landing page
or pages?
57.
58.
59. • Calls to action listed on
every program page.
• Degree-specific academics
page explains the way the
degree can be customized.
• Offers both data and
storytelling.
• Events are linked by
location.
60. • Calls to action listed on
every program page.
• Degree-specific academics
page explains the way the
degree can be customized.
• Offers both data and
storytelling.
• Events are linked by
location.
61.
62. • Overview of products (major and
minor) are the first page
• Includes information on internships,
jobs, and a page just for those
thinking about grad school
• Lists program-specific accolades
and awards
• Simple, concise explanations of the
requirements for earning the degree
• Sample courses shown
63.
64.
65. • Entry page covers all the basics
and then some.
• The entire thing is designed to
clarify process – from
investigation to getting in (it
even has interview tips).
• “Key Information Set” – data on
things like student satisfaction.
• How to apply, open house
information, who to call are all
listed up front.
66.
67.
68. • Content supports careers, where
alumni work, concentrations, major-
specific learning options, and faculty
highlights – all on one single page.
• Dedicated (but customized) areas for
high-ability students on almost every
major page.
• Program requirements are included
for current students – no specific
courses codes listed.
• Bottom of the page offers similar
majors.
69.
70.
71. • Relevant data right up front
• Superb “What to Expect”
section tells the story of what
it’s like to earn the degree –
time spent in class, lab work,
and more.
• Custom viewbook widget is a
little buggy, but it does allow
someone to assemble a multi-
program pdf – it’s worth
checking out.
72. To recap, some of the things that make program pages good:
• You need to be giving them access to next steps from
program pages – no exceptions.
• Assume that it’s a visitor’s first time there – but have more
details available for the repeat visitor (think of the Oxford
example).
• Anything that explains what to expect – from selectivity, to
typical courses to time spent in class – is good.
73. • Part of the program page or section should be dedicated to
high ability students (honors, accolades, research
opportunities).
• Data AND storytelling, not one or the other.
• Programs should always link to similar programs or at least
have a button for a listing page.
74. Who can help with data (program, internship, placement and/or
academic satisfaction)?
• Director of institutional research (if you’ve got one)
• Academic deans
• Admissions
• Career services offices
80. Decentralized programs
In this model, the deans and/or content editors
for each department are usually responsible for
maintaining the program pages.
82. Centralized programs
(uncommon)
Program pages live under a
single sections – academics
or admissions.
This model doesn’t require
someone to browse the
department to get to the
program.
Program pages link to
departments.
To departments
ACADEMICS OR
ADMISSIONS
UNDERGRADUATE GRADUATE OTHER
HOME
PROGRAM PROGRAM
PROGRAM PROGRAM
PROGRAM PROGRAM
PROGRAM PROGRAM
PROGRAM PROGRAM
PROGRAM PROGRAM
PROGRAM PROGRAM
PROGRAM PROGRAM
PROGRAM PROGRAM
83. Is it possible to have both models?
Yes – sometimes undergraduate majors and
minors are contained in one centralized location on
the main .edu site and all graduate programs are
contained on the department sites.
84. My own recommendation is for these pages to be
centralized under academics.
Why? It doesn’t make sense to be kicking up to
50% undecided undergraduates down into the
college and school level.
85. 2Assemble a core team to work on
program pages and decide...
... who needs to buy-in to the process.
... who will be writing / editing the pages.
86. 3Pick 10 to 20 programs to pilot – could
be the most popular, the best-ranked, the
oldest (since these tend to have more
content), or a mix.
87. 4Do a competitive analysis of the program
pages of your top three competitors and
top three aspirants.
88. 5
Set up easy, semantic URLs for
redirection to program pages – so you
can promote or link to programs in
marketing materials.
fabercollege.edu/ecology
89. 6Do a content table that lays out the
minimum viable content model for a
program page or section. You can always
scale up for the more robust majors.
90. 7Test program pages with prospective or
current students. This could be your
current pages or concepts for new pages.
See for yourself what your audiences
want.