Antimicrobial susceptibility testing – disk diffusion methods
This document provides information on antimicrobial susceptibility testing using disk diffusion methods. It discusses the importance of AST for treating infectious diseases and monitoring antimicrobial resistance. The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method is described in detail, including media preparation, inoculum standardization, disk and antibiotic solution preparation, quality control strains, incubation, reading zones of inhibition, and interpreting results according to CLSI guidelines. Special considerations are given to organisms like MRSA, VISA, and inducible clindamycin resistance in Staphylococci.
INTRODUCTION
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testis very important
for treating infectious diseases and monitoring
antimicrobial resistance in various pathogens.
It is essential that the reports are
relevant,
timely
interpreted correctly
to ensure Quality Control.
3.
To guidethe clinician- selection of antibiotics
To accumulate epidemiological information
on the resistance of microorganisms of
public health
importance within the community.
4.
DEFINITION
AST :
It isa determination of least amount of an
antimicrobial chemotherapeutic agent that will
inhibit the growth of microorganism invitro.
Quality control :
A process in the laboratory designed to monitor the
analytical phase of testing procedure to ensure
that tests are working properly.
5.
AST methods
a. Diskdiffusion method:
1. Kirby Bauer method
2. Stokes method
b. MIC:
1. Broth dilution method
2. Agar dilution method
c. E-test
6.
Diffusion-Kirby Bauer method
Principle
Paper disks impregnated with antimicrobial agent are
placed on agar medium uniformly seeded with the test
organism.
A concentration gradient of the antibiotic is formed by
diffusion from the disk and the growth of the test
organism is inhibited at a distance form the disk (that
is related among other factor) to the susceptibility of
the organism
7.
Medium
According toCLSI (clinical laboratory standard institute)
Muller Hinton Agar - Non fastidious organism
Temperature - 45°C to 50°C
Thickness 4mm
PH 7.2 – 7.4
Moisture
Storage: 5 days at 2-8°C
Prolonged storage causes – dehydration of the media
MHA Plates wrapped in air tight plastic bags and
refrigerated – 2 weeks
8.
Media used
Muller HintonAgar
It is best for non fastidious organism
It shows acceptable batch to batch
reproducibility
It has low thymidine content.
(Increased thymidine antagonise the activity of
sulphonamides)
Reverse the inhibitory effect of SXT – lesser or
no zone-falls resistant report
To check QC – ATCC 29212
E.faecalis – SXT ->20mm
9.
MHBA ( 5%sheep blood agar )
Strept. Pneumoniae
Beta strept, alpha strept, non haemolytic strept
MHCA & HTM
Haemophilus spp
GC agar
Gonococci
Media used contd
10.
Antibiotics
Commercial disk
Whenever wereceive the antibiotics check the label,
Mfg date, Exp date and Lot no.
It should be checked with ATCC strains
Stored at -20°C or -70°C and at 4°C – 8°C
Routine use keep at 4°C – 8°C
Paper disk (In-house)
Whatmann filter paper No. 2 is used
Diameter 6mm with regular edges
Sterilize by hot air oven at 160°C for 1hour
Do not use irregular edged and charred disk
11.
Antibiotic solution preparation
It is always prepared from pure substance
Stock made concentrations depending on disk strength
Some antibiotics dissolved in organic solvent and others
in sterile distilled water
Use only minimum volume of organic solvent to stabilize
the antimicrobial powder
After preparing the solution should checked with ATCC
strains
Prepared antibiotics are aliquote into 6-7 ml in tubes
Lesser amount – improper delivery of antibiotic
12.
Antibiotic solution preparation
Eg; Ampicillin – Needed concentration-2000µg/ml(DD
strength 10µg/ml)
1mg=1000µg/ml
2mg=2000µg/ml
20mg=2000µg/10ml
200mg=2000µg/100ml
Volume stock (in ml) =weight(mg) x potency of
antibiotic(µg) /needed concentration(µg)
Obtaining satisfactory results, dispense 10ml into 20ml
sterile tube
Store it at -20°C for six months
13.
Inoculum
Turbidity standardfor inoculum preparation
McFarland Standard – BaSO4
0.5 - 2 x 108 - for GNB and fast growing organism
1.0 - 3 x 108 - for Gram positive cocci
14.
PREPARATION OF CULTURE
Select10 morphologically identical well isolated
colonies
Inoculate in 1.5ml NB
Incubate for 2hrs
15.
Adjust opacity –McFarland's standard
0.5 for Gram Negative bacilli
1 for Gram Positive cocci
16.
INOCULATION
Marking theplates
Six antibiotics – 85 to 90mm petridishes
Two antibiotics – QC
Streaking the plates
( within 15 mins after opacity adjusted )
Placing the disks
In-between two disk – 24mm
Periphery to the disk – 15mm
Overlapping of zone of inhibition should be
avoided
Time duration – 15mins
Loop 2mm diameter it delivers 0.005ml
Ensure complete contact to the agar surface
disk should not be relocated
17.
INCUBATION & ATMOSPHERE
MHAplates are incubated at 37°C for 16-18hrs
MHBA, HTM are incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2
incubator
18.
ATCC control strainsfor AST
QUALITY CONTROL
To check the quality of the medium
Potency of the antibiotic
Technical error
When ever we receive new drug or media
19.
Quality control (QC)
QC - A procedure which ensures that the
performance of a test/procedure is reliable
QC in AST - Testing a standard strain of known susceptibility
to the antimicrobial agent tested
Goal of QC - Accuracy and reproducibility
READING
Each zone sizeis interpreted according to the
organism by reference in the CLSI guidelines
RESISTANCE :resistant , to indicate that the
bacteria can not be inhibited by the antibiotics.
INTERMEDIATE : intermediate , to indicate that
the bacteria can be inhibited by the high dose of
antibiotics.
SUSCEPTIBLE :susceptible, to indicate that the
bacteria can be inhibited by the normal dose of
antibiotics
23.
READING AND INTERPRETATION
Onlypure growth is considered for reading
Inoculum should be adequate
There should not be any misplacing of antibiotics
Quality control strains should be in expected
ranges (guided by CLSI)
24.
Acidic pH of medium
Alkaline p H of medium
Addition of thymidine to
medium
Low content of thymidine
Less action
aminoglycoside,
quinolones and macrolides,
excess activity of tetra
More activity of
Aminoglycosides,
quinolones and macrolides
Lesser activity of tetra
Decrease activity of SXT –
resistant zone
ATCC 29212 E.faecalis – SXT
more than – 20mm
satisfactory
25.
Magnesium + Calcium(cation)
Excess : reduce zone size for aminoglycoside
Low : increase zone size for aminoglycoside
Zinc
Excess : reduce zone size for carbapenems
Lesser : increase zone size in carbapenems
26.
Larger zone ofinhibition
Light inoculum
Error in inoculum preparation
Depth of the medium is thin
MHA is nutritionally unacceptable
Smaller zone of inhibition
heavy inoculum
Error in inoculum preparation
Depth of the medium is thick
27.
One or morezone too small or too large zone
Measurement error
Transcription error
Random defective disk
Disk not pressed firmly to the agar surface
One QC strain is out of range but other QC strain are within
range for the same antibiotic
One may be the better indicator of QC problem
Two QC strain is out of for the same antibiotic
Problem with the disk
Cont…
Colonieswithin the zones
of inhibition
Zones overlap
Zones indistinct
Mixed culture
Resistant mutants within
the zone.
disks too close together
Poorly streaked plate
30.
• Cont….
Double zone
Proteusswarming – ignore
Fastidious organism – eg, beta Strept,
S.pneumoniae – zone of inhibition
not by haemolysis
Co-trimoxazole reading
31.
Precautions
Ampicillin is alwaysR to Klebsiella and Aeromonas
spp
Nitrofurantoin S to E.coli R to Proteus and
Klebsiella
Cefoxitin R – MRSA
Cefpodoxime R – ESBL in GNB
Imipenem and meropenem R – CRO
32.
Cont….
Vancomycin andteicoplanin resistant – VRE
Alert forms – HICC, MS office, respective
units/wards
S.typhi and S. paratyphi A newer guideline for
ciprofloxacin – >31 is S and MIC by E.test
Oxacillin R S.pneumoniae do penicillin MIC
33.
ADVANTAGES
Technically simple toperform
Reproducible reagents are inexpensive
Does not require any special equipments
Easily understood by clinicians
Flexible regarding the selection of antibiotics
Stokes method
Susceptible –zone size of the test strain is larger
than or equal to control strain
Resistant – zone size of the test strain is smaller
than 2mm
Intermediate – zone size of the test strain is 2-
3mm smaller than that of the control strain
Advantages
Both control and test organism is same environment
Disadvantages
2 to 4 antibiotics in one plate is tested
Laborious
Organisms requiring specialconsiderations
• Emergence of resistance:
• Staphylococci:
• Methicillin resistant S.aureus:
• Oxacillin and other penicilinase resistant penicillin such as
methicillin, cloxacillin constitute the drug of choice for
Staphylococcal infections.
• Methicillin is no longer the agent of choice for testing
and treatment.
• The penicillin binding protein which has low affinity for
binding all beta-lactam drugs is encoded by the gene
mec A
38.
Contd....
• mec Ais responsible for resistance to methicillin
and other beta lactam antibiotics
• mec A encodes penicillin binding proteins 2a,
which differs from other penicillin binding protein
as its active site does not bind methicillin or other
beta lactam antibiotics
• Penicillin binding protein 2a can continue to
catalyze the transpeptidation reaction required
for peptidoglycan, enabling the cell wall synthesis
in the presence of antibiotics
39.
Contd....
• Consequence ofthe inability of PBP2a to interact
with beta lactams
• Acquition of mecA confers resistance to all beta
lactam antibiotics in addition to methicillin
• MRSA is significant in hospital acquired and
community associated infections
• Drug of choice – vancomycin and teicoplanin –
injectable
• Rifampacin and linezolid – oral drug
• Topical application – bacitracin, chlorohexidine,
mupirocin
40.
Detection methods forMRSA
• Cefoxitin DD – surrogate marker
• Because cefoxitin serves to induce greater
expression of PBP2a in mec A containing strains of
Staphylococci and also function as test reagent to
detect resistant.
• Oxacillin screen plate
– MHA with 4%Nacl + 6mg per ml
– Spot inoculate – incubate at 350C
– More than one colony indicates oxacillin resistant
Molecular detection by PCR can be performed
41.
• CLSI recommendscefoxitin for specific break
points interpretative criteria for S.aureus and
Coagulase neg Staph.
• Cefoxitin – zone of inhibition can be easily read
than oxacillin DD.
Break points for DD interpretation
Cefoxitin Oxacillin
Resistance Susceptible Resistance Intermediate Susceptible
S.aureus 21 22 10 11-12 13
CONS 24 25 17 - 18
42.
Cefoxitin vs Oxacillin
•Cefoxitin
• Stable drug
• Requires 16-18hrs
incubation at 370C
• No supplement is
necessary
• Clear zone of inhibition
and wider range of
interpretative criteria
• Oxacillin
• Degradation on storage
• Requires 24hrs incubation
at 350 C
• 2-5% Nacl is added
• Narrow range of
interpretative criteria
hence zone of inhibition is
measured using
transmitted light
43.
Vancomycin resistance ordiminished
susceptibility in S.aureus
• Strains with reduce susceptibility to vancomycin have been
called vanco intermediate S.aureus (VISA) or glycopeptide
intermediate (GISA)
• Between 2002-2005 five different strain of MRSA were
detected for the first time with vancomycin resistant.
• The first MRSA isolate with more subtle diminished
susceptibility to vancomycin with MIC value 8mg per ml
(intermediate)
• Although still uncommon both vanco(R) S.aureus and VISA
are of great concern because vanco is the drug of choice for
MRSA
44.
DETECTION METHODS
• VancomycinDD
• Vancomycin MIC
• Vancomycin agar screen test
– Brain heart infusion agar with vancomycin 6mg per ml
45.
Inducible clindamycin resistantin
Staphylococci:
• Two different resistant mechanisms confers
macrolide resistance (e.g. erythromycin)
• The erm gene codes for methylation of 23S r RNA
which results in resistant to erythromycin and
either inducible or constitutive resistant to
clindamycin.
• The msrA gene codes for an efflux mechanisms
which results in resistance to erythromycin but
susceptible to clindamycin.
• D zonetest for inducible clinda resistance to be
performed before reporting clindamycin
• For the D zone test erythromycin and clindamycin
disk to be placed 15-26 mm edge to edge on MHA
by usual DD test.
• Incubation-16-18hrs at 37c.
• Flatening of the clinda zone between the 2 disk –
indicates the isolate has inducible clindamycin
resistant because of erm gene
• No flatening the isolate is erythromycin resistant
(due to msrA).
48.
• D zonepositive- clindamycin resistant
• D zone negative- clindamycin susceptible
• Both erythromycin and clindamycin resistant- clindamycin
resistant.
Vancomycin resistant Enterococci:
• E. faecium and the E.faecalis are most common resistant to
vancomycin and teicoplanin
• Six different types of vancomycin resistance
• Van A and B are most commonly encountered
• Van A – resistance to both vancomycin and teicoplanin
• Van B - resistance to vancomycin and susceptible to
teicoplanin
49.
VRE mechanism
• Alterationto the terminal amino acid residues of
the NAM/NAG-peptide subunits
• The D-alanyl-D-lactate variation results in the loss
of one hydrogen-bonding interaction
• This loss of just one point of interaction results in
a decrease in affinity between vancomycin and
peptide
50.
VRE detection
• Diskdiffusion
• MIC by broth dilution, agar dilution and E-test
• Vancomycin agar screen plate
• BHIA with 6mg vancomycin can be used for
Enterococci and Staphylococci
• Drugs – daptomycin, linezolid, quinipristin
dalfopristin
51.
High level aminoglycosideresistance
• Enterococci are inherently resistant to the
concentration of aminoglycoside producing their use
as single agent for treatment of enterococcal
infections
• This low level resistance is due to the poor drug
uptake by the enterococcal cells.
• However enterococci develop high level
aminoglycoside resistance in which the particular
aminoglycoside does not demonstrate synergism
with the cell wall active agent penicillin or ampicillin.
52.
• High levelaminoglycoside resistant in
enterococci is usually the result of enzyamtic
inactivation of the drugs.
• Detection by
DD – Gentamicin 120µg
MIC - Gentamicin 500µg
53.
ESBL
• The majormechanism of resistant to β-lactam antimicrobial
agent in Gram negative bacilli is production of β-lactamase
enzyme because of their increased spectrum activity.
• ESBL are a group of plasmid mediated diverse complex and
rapidly evolving enzymes that are posing a major therapeutic
challenge in the treatment of hospitalized and community
based patients.
• Infections caused by ESBL strains from UTI to life threatening
sepsis.
54.
• Β-lactamase theseenzymes share the ability to hydrolyse
These cephalosporins include cefotaxime,ceftriaxone,
and ceftazidime, as well as monobactam aztreonam.
• ESBL – producing organsims exhibit co-resistance to many
other class of antibiotics.
• Because of inoculum effect and substrate specificity –their
detection is also major challenge.
• But now CLSI gives the guideline for detection of ESBL in
Klebsiella pneumoniae, K.oxytoca, E.coli and Pr.mirabilis.
• ESBL are β-lactamase capable of confering bacterial
resistance to the penicillin, I, II and III generation of
cephalosporins and aztreonam
55.
β lactamases
Restricted
spectrum
β lactamases
ESBL
AmpCβ
lactamases
CTX-M OXA
Serine MBL
Class B
Class A OXA
Class D
OthersClassical
TEM-1 & 2,
SHV-1
TEM-3,
SHV-2
Over
65
types
11, 14,
15, 16,
17
CMY, LAT,
FOX
KPC,
SME,
IMI
23, 24,
40, 51,
58
Carbapenemases
IMP,
VIM,
NDM
CLSI ESBL confirmatorytests
interpretation
For E. coli, Klebsiella, and P. mirabilis
MIC test ≥3 two-fold concentration decrease in MIC of
cefotaxime/ceftazidime +/- clavulanate 4 μg/ml
Disk test ≥5-mm increase in zone diameter for
cefotaxime/ceftazidime +/- clavulanate 10 μg
59.
Icil
AmpC Beta lactamases
•Chromosomal mediated in Enterobacter, Serratia,
Citrobacter, Morganella, Providencia
• Plasmid-mediated in E. coli and Klebsiella
Emergence predominantly in community-acquired
infections
• Co-resistance to aminoglycosides, SXT, quinolones
TEM, SHV CTX-M OXA AmpC
Cefpodoxime R R R R
Clavulanate S S R R
Cephamycins S S S R
Cefepime R R R S
60.
Drug of Choice
•Carbapenems (Impenem, meropenem)
• Colistin, polymyxin, tigecycline for serious
infections
• Co-trimoxazole, nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin,
gentamycin, amikacin and inhibitor combinations
for uncomplicated infections.
61.
Carbapenemase
• Carbapenems –Highest class of beta lactam agent
current available, eg, imipenem, meropenem,
ertapenem
• Carbapenem resistance to all beta lactam antibiotics
such as penicillin, cephalosporins, monobactams and
carbapenems
• Carbapenem resistance due to
Production of carbapenemases
Excess production of ESBL, porin loss, increased
efflux pumps
• Carbapenemases are beta lactamase enzyme coded
by plasmids
62.
• In GNBmost commonly encountered are
• Klebsiella pneumoniae carabapenemase (KPC) -
Serine in their active site
• Metallo beta lactamases – Zinc in their active site
• Metallo beta lcatamases – R to all beta lactams
but S to monobactam
• KPC – R to all beta lactam / beta lactamase
inhibitor
63.
Detection methods
• DD– imipenem, meropenem
• MIC – broth, agar dilutions
• E-test
Modified Hodge test
• Lawn culture of E. coli ATCC 25922 - 1/10 of 0.5
McFarland
• ERT10 μg
• Inoculate cultures as shown in figure
• edge of disk to periphery
64.
CONCLUSION
• AST isvery important for the clinician to treat the
patient with appropriate antibiotics.
• Formulation of antibiotic policy
• Surveillance of resistance
– In community
– Hospital out breaks
• Lab to upgrade its own good standard
• Ensures accuracy, reliability reproducibility of the
test performed.