This document discusses how networked individualism and social media are impacting alternative dispute resolution processes like peer mediation. It notes that people now function more as networked individuals with diverse, loosely connected networks rather than relying on tight-knit groups. Peer mediation tweets reveal critiques of the fairness of the process as well as struggles over the appropriate forum to resolve disputes. The implications discussed include the need for ADR programs to incorporate social media as an important backchannel and to consider expanded coaching and monitoring roles to address issues raised in the virtual space.