2. CONTENT
LEADER
LEADERSHIP
LEADER VS MANAGER
INGREDIENTS OF LEADERSHIP
HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT STUDIES ON LEADERSHIP
TRADITIONAL THEORIES OF LEADRESHIP
MODERN THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP
STYLES OF LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT
3. LEADER
A leader is a person whose behaviour stimulates action in a
group.
A person who influences a group of people towards the
achievement of a goal.
4. LEADERSHIP
Art or process of influencing people so that they will strive
willingly and enthusiastically towards the achievement's of
group goals.
Willingness with zeal and confidence
7. ROLES OF LEADER
1.Group spokesman
2. Group co-coordinator
3. Group advisor
4. As a policy maker
5. As a planner
6. As a symbol of a group
7. As an expert
8. As an educator
9. As an initiator
10. As an evaluator
11. External group representative
8. HISTORICALLY IMPORTANT STUDIES ON LEADERSHIP
THE LOWA LEADERSHIP STUDIES
THE OHIO STATE LEADERSHIP STUDIES
THE EARLY MICHIGAN LEADERSHIP STUDIES
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15. TRADITIONAL THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP
GREAT MAN THEORY
TRAIT THEORY
GROUP AND EXCHANGE THEORY
CONTIGENCY THEORY
PATH GOAL THEORY
16.
17. What characteristics or traits make a person a leader?
Trait theories of leadership sought personality, social,
physical or intellectual traits that differentiate leaders from
non leaders
Limitations
• No universal traits found that predict leadership in all
situations
• Unclear evidence of the cause and effect of relationship of
leadership and traits
• Better predictor of the appearance of leadership than
distinguishing effective and ineffective leaders
TRAIT THEORY
18. Leader–Member Exchange Theory
This theory argues that because of time pressure, leaders establish a special
relationship with a small group of their followers.
These individuals make up the in-group and other followers fall into the out-group.
19.
20. Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory
In-group members
Share a common bond and value
system
Interact with the leader regularly
Receive more challenging
assignments and more meaningful
rewards
Are more positive about the
organization and have higher job
performance and satisfaction
Out-group members
Have less in common with the
leader
Have limited interactions with
the leader
Receive less challenging work
and little positive reinforcement
Become bored and often quit
21.
22. Fred Fiedler developed a situational model of leadership which is termed as
contingency theory of leadership.
Fiedler theorized that leadership effectiveness is a matter of match between a leader’s
personality and the situation or setting in which he functions.
CONTIGENCY THEORY
23.
24. Least Preferred Co-Worker (LPC) Questionnaire
An instrument that purports to measure whether a person is task- or relationship-oriented.
He distinguished two leadership personalities which are poles apart:
1.Task oriented leaders and
2. Human relations oriented leaders
He further classified that:
1. Leader-member relations may be: good or poor
2. Task structure may be :high or low
3. Position power may be :strong or weak.
By mixing these three contingency variables, there are different eight situations in which a
leader can find him self.
He further classified these eight situations as
very favorable,
moderately favorable
very unfavorable
27. Path-Goal Theory
based on specifying a leader's style or behavior that best fits the employee and work
environment in order to achieve a goal (House, Mitchell, 1974).
The goal is to increase your employees' motivation, empowerment, and satisfaction
so they become productive members of the organization.
Path-Goal is based on Vroom's (1964) expectancy theory in which an individual will
act in a certain way based on the expectation that the act will be followed by a given
outcome and on the attractiveness of that outcome to the individual. The path-goal
theory was first introduced by Martin Evans (1970) and then further developed by
House (1971).
It best be thought of as a process in which leaders select specific behaviors that are
best suited to the employees' needs and the working environment so that they may
best guide the employees through their path in the obtainment of their daily work
activities (goals) (Northouse, 2013).
28.
29.
30.
31.
32. CHRISMATIC LEADERSHIP
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP
AUTHENTIC LEADERSHIP
MODERN THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP
33. Charismatic leadership is basically the method of encouraging
particular behaviors in others by way of eloquent communication,
persuasion and force of personality.
Charismatic leadership
34. 1. Vision and articulation.
Has a vision—expressed as an idealized goal—that proposes a future better than the status quo; and is able to
clarify the importance of the vision in terms that are understandable to others
2. Personal risk.
Willing to take on high personal risk, incur high costs and engage in self-sacrifice to achieve the vision
3. Environmental sensitivity.
Able to make realistic assessments of the environmental constraints and resources needed to bring about
change
4. Sensitivity to follower needs.
Perceptive of others’ abilities and responsive to their needs and feelings
5. Unconventional behavior.
Engages in behaviors that are perceived as novel and counter to norms
35.
36. Transactional Leadership
Transactional leadership is a style of leadership that focuses
on supervision, organization, and performance;
transactional leadership is a style of leadership in
which leaders promote compliance by followers through both
rewards and punishments.
Leaders who guide or motivate their followers in the direction
of established goals by clarifying role and task requirements.
This type describes the interaction between leader and follower
as a transaction.
A follower agrees to serve the leader in return for some sort of
incentive. This could be a wage if it is in business, or perhaps
just a feeling of accomplishment in a volunteer situation.
37. Characteristics of Transactional Leaders
Contingent Reward:
Contracts exchange of rewards for effort, promises rewards for good performance,
recognizes accomplishments
Management by Exception (active):
Watches and searches for deviations from rules and standards, takes corrective action
Management by Exception (passive):
Intervenes only if standards are not met
Laissez-Faire:
Abdicates responsibilities, avoids making decisions
38. Transformational Leadership
Transformational leadership is a style of leadership where a leader works with
subordinates to identify needed change, creating a vision to guide the change
through inspiration, and executing the change in tandem with committed
members of a group.
Transformational leadership serves to enhance the motivation, morale, and job
performance of followers through a variety of mechanisms.
39.
40. Characteristics of Transformational Leaders
Idealized Influence:
Provides vision and sense of mission, instills pride, gains respect and trust
Inspiration:
Communicates high expectations, uses symbols to focus efforts,
expresses important purposes in simple ways
Intellectual Stimulation:
Promotes intelligence, rationality, and careful problem solving
Individualized Consideration:
Gives personal attention, treats each employee individually, coaches,
advises
41.
42.
43. DIFFERENT LEADERSHIP IN PRESENT AERAS
SERVENT LEADERSHIP
POLITICAL LEADERSHIP
CONTEXTUAL LEADERSHIP
E LEADERSHIP
PRIMAL LEADERSHIP
RELATIONALLEADERSHIP
POSITIVE LEADERSHIP
SHARED LEADERSHIP
RESPONSIBLE LEADERSHIP
48. 'Managerial grid' as developed by Robert Blake and Jane Mouton,
It is a graphic model of alternative combinations of managerial styles or orientations or
behaviour, on a two dimensional space. The two styles or orientations are:
1. Concern for production and
2. Concern for people.
1, 1: Low concern for production and for people (Impoverished leadership)
1, 9: Low concern for production and high concern for people( Country club
leadership)
9, 1: High concern for production and low concern for people (Task leadership
5, 5: Moderate concern for production and people( Middle of the road leadership
9, 9: High concern for production and people ( Team leadership):
MANAGERIAL GRID
49.
50. Rensis Likert and his associates studied the patterns and styles of managers for three
decades at the University of Michigan, USA, and identified a four-fold model of
management systems.
The model was developed on the basis of a questionnaire administered to managers in
over 200 organizations and research into the performance characteristics of different
types of organizations.
LIKERTS LEADERSHIP STYLE
51. 1.Exploitative-authoritative: The first system of Rensis Likert theory is characterized by
decision-making in the upper echelons of the organization, with no teamwork and little
communication other than threats.
2. Benevolent-authoritative: This Likert system is based on a master-servant relationship
between management and employees, where rewards are the sole motivators and both
teamwork and communication are minimal.
3. Consultative: In this style, managers partly trust subordinates, use both rewards and
involvement to inspire motivation, foster a higher level of responsibility for meeting goals,
and inspire a moderate amount of teamwork and some communication.
4. Participative-group: This system is based on managerial trust and confidence in
employees; collectively determined, goal-based rewards; a collective sense of responsibility
for meeting company objectives; collaborative teamwork and open communication
52.
53. Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory
Situational Leadership Theory (SLT)
A contingency theory that focuses on followers’
readiness; the more “ready” the followers (the more
willing and able) the less the need for leader support
and supervision.
54.
55. Finding and Creating Effective Leaders
Selection
Review specific requirements for the job
Use tests that identify personal traits associated with leadership, measure self-
monitoring, and assess emotional intelligence
Conduct personal interviews to determine candidate’s fit with the job
Training
Recognize that all people are not equally trainable
Teach skills that are necessary for employees to become effective leaders
Provide behavioral training to increase the development potential of nascent
charismatic employees