Audience feedback

1. Audience Feedback

2. This question was asked the questionnaire
produced on eval and go for general
information for the target audience that filled
out the questionnaire to see who filled it in
more male or female. The graph shows that
most of the viewers were female, this means
that if I was to produce this questionnaire
again I would try to get more accurate results
by having more males fill out the
questionnaire so you have the same amount
of opinions from each.

3. This question was also once again was asked for
general information about who viewed our
production and filled out the questionnaire. The
viewers were mainly between the ages of 16-19. If
this was to be produced again I would try to get
more variety of ages that would fill out the
questionnaire so there is different opinions from
different ages which could make the responses
even more accurate,

4. This question was asked in the
questionnaire to see if that the two
different advertisements met their job
role of advertising the documentary,
From the results 100% of viewers
said that they would be interested in
watching the documentary, this means
that the advertisements were
successful.

5. This question was asked in the
questionnaire to see if the people who
filled out the questionnaire thought if
the newspaper advertisement has been
produced profesionally as this was one
of the aims to produce a professional
and conventional product. The viewer
that said no to the newspaper
advertisement being professional could
be because they may not know
anything about newspaper
advertisement so they don't know how
they are suppose to look or they don't
know the conventions.

6. This question was asked for the
audiences opinion if they liked the print
advertisement. The graph shows that the
respondants were not as simple as most
people did like the advertisement and
there was average which was in the
middle. I have learnt from this that the
advertisement could have been slightly
better.

7. This question was asked to see the opinions how
professional our Documentary looked. From the graphs I
have learnt that the viewers think that our Documentary is
professional however maybe some improvements could
have been made to make it even more professional.

8. The results from this question show that they are all
positive comments from people who selected the scale
rating or 3 upwards. I learnt from this that the documentary
followed codes and conventions to be of a professional
standard.

9. The results from this question show that most
people rated that our Documentary was
informative as a high number. I have learnt from
this that our Documentary to the audience was
an informative production.

10. This question was asked to
see why the audience rated
it this scale. I found out that
the documentary was
informative but some people
did want more information.

11. This question was asked to
see what the audience thought
about the techical quality
however from this I have learnt
that the quality was good but
however the results may not be
accurate as not all viewers may
be media students so they may
not know.

12. From these responses of
why the technical quality was
good I learnt that the
Documentary does flow and
it is technically good as
codes and conventions were
followed.

13. This question was asked to
see if the audience feel
intrigued to watch the full 5
minutes. I learnt that most of
the viewers felt intrigued
which I learnt that the
products were successful as
the audience wanted to
watch it.

14. This question was asked to
see why the audience felt
intrigued to watch the
Documentary. I learnt that
the feedback was positive
for this question and makes
people want to watch.

15. This question was asked to ask
the audience how entertaining
they thought the Documentary
was. From the results I learnt
that it lower on the
entertainment side as
informative is slightly higher in
responses, so I learnt that our
documentary is more
informative than entertaining.

16. This question was asked to see if
our Documentary was professional
compared to other media products. I
learnt that from the results our
products were similiar and
professional as most viewers said
yes, where as nobody said no. Also
some viewers said they were unsure
this could be because they dont
know conventions to make sure that it
looked professional.

17. This question was asked to see what
the audiences favourite aspect in the
documentary is, and also we could
see any improvements in certain
sections. The graphs shows that the
voxpops and title sequence were not
the best things in the documentary,
the most popular was the interviews. I
learnt that the voxpops and title
sequence could be improved more in
editing.

18. This question was asked to
see why this was their favourite
aspect in the documentary
which most the feedback
relates that the documentary is
professional. I learnt from this
question that our documentary
did look to a professional
standard.

19. This question was asked to
see which interview was liked
the most. The results show
that the most popular
interview was Zumba
instructor and dog walker.

20. This question was asked to
see why this was the
audiences favourite interview
. I learnt that the dog walker
seem to be the favourite
because it related to the
documentary and was just a
simple type of exercise.

21. This question was asked to see if
the newspaper advertisement and
radio trailer did relate to the
documentary. The graph shows
that most people said yes, so i
learnt that the products all relate
together and also that the one
person that said no probably
doesn’t know the codes and
conventions, I know this as every
viewer said yes except one.

22. This question was asked to
see whether our aim was
successful to include as many
different exercises and
methods to keep fit. All the
viewers said yes. I learnt from
this is that the exposition of
the documentary is clearly
highlighted.

23. This question was asked to
see what improvements could
have been made. Most
people said that more variety
of methods to keep fit could
have been included. I learnt
from this the different
improvements that could have
been made.

24. We asked this question so
we had more detail on how to
improve the documentary.
Some feedback was that the
documentary could have
included some more facts.

25. We asked this question so that
we could see if the audience
thought that the documentary
flows. All viewers said yes which
I learnt from this that the
documentary was
understandable, and also that
following codes and conventions
a professional product will be
produced.

26. We asked this question to see
if the exercises that were
included was a decent amount
for this length of time. 94% of
viewers said yes and some
people said that there could
have been more but I learnt
from this that there was enough
content to keep the audience
engaged.

27. This question was asked to see
if the audience thought we had
included enough information.
Most people said that there was
enough information. I learnt from
this that there was enough
content to advertise the
documentary. But there could
have been more facts involved.

28. This question was asked to see why this one person said no the radio trailer
not having enough information. This feedback was that the radio clip was
short so not enough information could have been included.

29. This question was asked to
see if the audience thought
that the documentary was
good that they would advise
a family member or friend to
watch. 100% said that they
would advise a friend or
family member.

30. This question was asked to see if
there was an actual 30 minute
documentary how many would
actually watch the full documentary.
94% of people said that they would.
The other 6% probably said no
because they may not be into sports.
I learnt that the Documentary was a
successful product because a lot of
people would watch the full 30
minute.