Transboundary co-operation in the fields of flood protection with Hungarian eyes
Workshop on “Flood management in a transboundary context”, 13-14.12.2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Why we need a Water Saturation vs. Height function for reservoir modelling.
Definitions: Free-Water-Level, HWC, Net, Swirr
Several case studies showing applications to reservoir modelling.
To determine a field’s hydrocarbon in place, it is necessary to model the distribution of hydrocarbon and water
throughout the reservoir. A water saturation vs. height (SwH) function provides this for the reservoir model. A
good SwH function ensures the three independent sources of fluid distribution data are consistent. These being
the core, formation pressure and electrical log data. The SwH function must be simple to apply, especially in
reservoirs where it is difficult to map permeability or where there appears to be multiple contacts. It must
accurately upscale the log and core derived water saturations to the reservoir model cell sizes.
This presentation clarifies the, often misunderstood, definitions for the free-water-level (FWL), transition zone
and irreducible water saturation. Using capillary pressure theory and the concept of fractals, a convincing SwH
function is derived from first principles. The derivation is simpler than with classical functions as there is no
porosity banding. Several case studies are presented showing the excellent match between the function and
well data. The function makes an accurate prediction of water saturations, even in wells where the resistivity
log was not run, due to well conditions. Logs and core data from eleven fields, with vastly different porosity and
permeability characteristics, depositional environments, and geological age, are compared. These
demonstrates how this SwH function is independent of permeability and litho-facies type and accurately
describes the reservoir fluid distribution.
The function determines the free water level, the hydrocarbon to water contact (HWC), net reservoir cut-off,
the irreducible water saturation, and the shape of the transition zone for the reservoir model. The function
provides a simple way to quality control electrical log and core data and justifies using core plug sized samples
to model water saturations on the reservoir scale. The presentation describes how the function has been used
to predict fluid contacts in wells where they are unclear, or where the contact is below the total depth of the
well. As the function uses the FWL as its base, it explains the apparently varying HWC in some fields and how
low porosity reservoirs can be fully water saturated for hundreds of feet above the FWL.
This simple convincing function calculates water saturation as a function of the height above the free water level
and the bulk volume of water and is independent of the porosity and permeability of the reservoir. It was voted
the best paper at the 1993 SPWLA Symposium in Calgary.
The Remarkable Benefits and Grave Dangers of using Artificial Intelligence in...Steve Cuddy
Overview
What is Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Petrophysical Case Studies showing successful applications
- Evolution of shaly water saturation equations
- Nuclear Magnetic Resonance T1 & T2 spectra analysis
- Prediction of shear velocities
- Litho-facies and permeability prediction
- The log quality control and repair of electrical logs
Narrow vs. General vs. True AI
The grave dangers of using AI
- More than AI making poor petrophysical predictions!
- I describe an end of civilisation scenario
Why we need a Water Saturation vs. Height function for reservoir modelling.
Definitions: Free-Water-Level, HWC, Net, Swirr
Several case studies showing applications to reservoir modelling.
To determine a field’s hydrocarbon in place, it is necessary to model the distribution of hydrocarbon and water
throughout the reservoir. A water saturation vs. height (SwH) function provides this for the reservoir model. A
good SwH function ensures the three independent sources of fluid distribution data are consistent. These being
the core, formation pressure and electrical log data. The SwH function must be simple to apply, especially in
reservoirs where it is difficult to map permeability or where there appears to be multiple contacts. It must
accurately upscale the log and core derived water saturations to the reservoir model cell sizes.
This presentation clarifies the, often misunderstood, definitions for the free-water-level (FWL), transition zone
and irreducible water saturation. Using capillary pressure theory and the concept of fractals, a convincing SwH
function is derived from first principles. The derivation is simpler than with classical functions as there is no
porosity banding. Several case studies are presented showing the excellent match between the function and
well data. The function makes an accurate prediction of water saturations, even in wells where the resistivity
log was not run, due to well conditions. Logs and core data from eleven fields, with vastly different porosity and
permeability characteristics, depositional environments, and geological age, are compared. These
demonstrates how this SwH function is independent of permeability and litho-facies type and accurately
describes the reservoir fluid distribution.
The function determines the free water level, the hydrocarbon to water contact (HWC), net reservoir cut-off,
the irreducible water saturation, and the shape of the transition zone for the reservoir model. The function
provides a simple way to quality control electrical log and core data and justifies using core plug sized samples
to model water saturations on the reservoir scale. The presentation describes how the function has been used
to predict fluid contacts in wells where they are unclear, or where the contact is below the total depth of the
well. As the function uses the FWL as its base, it explains the apparently varying HWC in some fields and how
low porosity reservoirs can be fully water saturated for hundreds of feet above the FWL.
This simple convincing function calculates water saturation as a function of the height above the free water level
and the bulk volume of water and is independent of the porosity and permeability of the reservoir. It was voted
the best paper at the 1993 SPWLA Symposium in Calgary.
The Remarkable Benefits and Grave Dangers of using Artificial Intelligence in...Steve Cuddy
Overview
What is Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Petrophysical Case Studies showing successful applications
- Evolution of shaly water saturation equations
- Nuclear Magnetic Resonance T1 & T2 spectra analysis
- Prediction of shear velocities
- Litho-facies and permeability prediction
- The log quality control and repair of electrical logs
Narrow vs. General vs. True AI
The grave dangers of using AI
- More than AI making poor petrophysical predictions!
- I describe an end of civilisation scenario
Overview of the Sava Commission activities
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Overview of the Sava Commission activities
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Coastal and Marine Environment Protection
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Protection and Sustainable Use of the Dinaric Karst Aquifer System (DIKTAS)
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Assessment of Transboundary, Rivers, Lakes and Groundwaters in South-Eastern Europe
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in Southeastern Europe, 15-16.12.2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Hydropower vs Flood Control in Dam and Basin Management Levels
Workshop on “Flood management in a transboundary context”, 13-14.12.2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Plants can't move and get out of the way when water levels become difficult to handle. Flooding and soil saturation leads to a depletion of oxygen in the soil and reduction of light and carbon dioxide availability. So how do plants deal with the stress of being flooded?
Flood Risk Management in Spain: flood control in transboundary rivers
Capacity Building Workshop on “Flood management in a transboundary context”, 13-14.12.2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Transboundary cooperation in the Prespa Park
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
6 years of Petersberg Phase II/Athens
Declaration Process, Contribution to the successful
story of Drin Dialogue
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Neretva and Trebisnjica Management Project
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Regional Cooperation Council
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Making hydropower sustainable in the Western Balkans
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Climate Variability and Change, Importance for IWRM planning process
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Extreme phenomena – Floods in transboundary rivers
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Transboundary flood management in a changing environment
International Roundtable on Protection and Sustainable Use of Trans-boundary Waters in South East Europe, 15-16 December 2011, Zagreb, Croatia
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
Securing your Kubernetes cluster_ a step-by-step guide to success !KatiaHIMEUR1
Today, after several years of existence, an extremely active community and an ultra-dynamic ecosystem, Kubernetes has established itself as the de facto standard in container orchestration. Thanks to a wide range of managed services, it has never been so easy to set up a ready-to-use Kubernetes cluster.
However, this ease of use means that the subject of security in Kubernetes is often left for later, or even neglected. This exposes companies to significant risks.
In this talk, I'll show you step-by-step how to secure your Kubernetes cluster for greater peace of mind and reliability.
Unlocking Productivity: Leveraging the Potential of Copilot in Microsoft 365, a presentation by Christoforos Vlachos, Senior Solutions Manager – Modern Workplace, Uni Systems
Elevating Tactical DDD Patterns Through Object CalisthenicsDorra BARTAGUIZ
After immersing yourself in the blue book and its red counterpart, attending DDD-focused conferences, and applying tactical patterns, you're left with a crucial question: How do I ensure my design is effective? Tactical patterns within Domain-Driven Design (DDD) serve as guiding principles for creating clear and manageable domain models. However, achieving success with these patterns requires additional guidance. Interestingly, we've observed that a set of constraints initially designed for training purposes remarkably aligns with effective pattern implementation, offering a more ‘mechanical’ approach. Let's explore together how Object Calisthenics can elevate the design of your tactical DDD patterns, offering concrete help for those venturing into DDD for the first time!
Pushing the limits of ePRTC: 100ns holdover for 100 daysAdtran
At WSTS 2024, Alon Stern explored the topic of parametric holdover and explained how recent research findings can be implemented in real-world PNT networks to achieve 100 nanoseconds of accuracy for up to 100 days.
A tale of scale & speed: How the US Navy is enabling software delivery from l...sonjaschweigert1
Rapid and secure feature delivery is a goal across every application team and every branch of the DoD. The Navy’s DevSecOps platform, Party Barge, has achieved:
- Reduction in onboarding time from 5 weeks to 1 day
- Improved developer experience and productivity through actionable findings and reduction of false positives
- Maintenance of superior security standards and inherent policy enforcement with Authorization to Operate (ATO)
Development teams can ship efficiently and ensure applications are cyber ready for Navy Authorizing Officials (AOs). In this webinar, Sigma Defense and Anchore will give attendees a look behind the scenes and demo secure pipeline automation and security artifacts that speed up application ATO and time to production.
We will cover:
- How to remove silos in DevSecOps
- How to build efficient development pipeline roles and component templates
- How to deliver security artifacts that matter for ATO’s (SBOMs, vulnerability reports, and policy evidence)
- How to streamline operations with automated policy checks on container images
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1DianaGray10
This session provides introduction to UiPath Communication Mining, importance and platform overview. You will acquire a good understand of the phases in Communication Mining as we go over the platform with you. Topics covered:
• Communication Mining Overview
• Why is it important?
• How can it help today’s business and the benefits
• Phases in Communication Mining
• Demo on Platform overview
• Q/A
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
PHP Frameworks: I want to break free (IPC Berlin 2024)Ralf Eggert
In this presentation, we examine the challenges and limitations of relying too heavily on PHP frameworks in web development. We discuss the history of PHP and its frameworks to understand how this dependence has evolved. The focus will be on providing concrete tips and strategies to reduce reliance on these frameworks, based on real-world examples and practical considerations. The goal is to equip developers with the skills and knowledge to create more flexible and future-proof web applications. We'll explore the importance of maintaining autonomy in a rapidly changing tech landscape and how to make informed decisions in PHP development.
This talk is aimed at encouraging a more independent approach to using PHP frameworks, moving towards a more flexible and future-proof approach to PHP development.
Sudheer Mechineni, Head of Application Frameworks, Standard Chartered Bank
Discover how Standard Chartered Bank harnessed the power of Neo4j to transform complex data access challenges into a dynamic, scalable graph database solution. This keynote will cover their journey from initial adoption to deploying a fully automated, enterprise-grade causal cluster, highlighting key strategies for modelling organisational changes and ensuring robust disaster recovery. Learn how these innovations have not only enhanced Standard Chartered Bank’s data infrastructure but also positioned them as pioneers in the banking sector’s adoption of graph technology.
SAP Sapphire 2024 - ASUG301 building better apps with SAP Fiori.pdfPeter Spielvogel
Building better applications for business users with SAP Fiori.
• What is SAP Fiori and why it matters to you
• How a better user experience drives measurable business benefits
• How to get started with SAP Fiori today
• How SAP Fiori elements accelerates application development
• How SAP Build Code includes SAP Fiori tools and other generative artificial intelligence capabilities
• How SAP Fiori paves the way for using AI in SAP apps
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...SOFTTECHHUB
The choice of an operating system plays a pivotal role in shaping our computing experience. For decades, Microsoft's Windows has dominated the market, offering a familiar and widely adopted platform for personal and professional use. However, as technological advancements continue to push the boundaries of innovation, alternative operating systems have emerged, challenging the status quo and offering users a fresh perspective on computing.
One such alternative that has garnered significant attention and acclaim is Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, a sleek, powerful, and user-friendly Linux distribution that promises to redefine the way we interact with our devices. With its focus on performance, security, and customization, Nitrux Linux presents a compelling case for those seeking to break free from the constraints of proprietary software and embrace the freedom and flexibility of open-source computing.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingAftab Hussain
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
11. •Zagreb, 13-14. December
•
•
2011.
•The Danube river basin in Central-Europe
•Most international basin in the world
•17 riparian countries
•Basin area: 801.463 km²
•Hungary and its 7 neighbours (Austria,
Slovakia, Ukraine, Roumania,
Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia) share 77,7
% of the basin area (605700 km²)
•Longitude: 2.857 km (HU stretch: 417 km)
12. •COOPERATION IN THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN
•EU aims:
• Sustainable use of water
• ICPDR :Coordination of the
Danube basin aims
•National aims:
•Consideration of the special flood prevention circumstances
•Implementation of EU WFD and Flood Directive
•
15. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Developments after the I. World War
•Permanent Technical Commission for
the Water Regime of the Danube
(CRED)
•C.R.E.D. worked in the period 1924-
1938.
•Liquidation of the water boards
•Initiated bilateral and trilateral frontier
water agreements among the
interested
•states
•Central topic: flood protection
16. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•The first frontier water agreements
•Hungarian-Roumanian General Water
Agreement 1924.
•Hungarian-Austrian Frontier Water
Agreement 1927.
•Hungarian-Czecho-Slovakian Frontier
Water Agreement 1937.
•Hungarian-Roumanian-Czecho-
Slovakian Technical Commission for
Transcarpathia
17. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Frontier water agreements
•after the II. World War
•1950. Hungarian-Soviet Agreement
(renewed in 1981. ended in 1993.)
•1950. Hungarian-Roumanian Agreement
(renewed in 1969. and in 1986.)
•1954. Hungarian-Czecho-Slovakian
• Agreement (renewed in 1976.)
•1955. Hungarian-Yugoslavian
Agreement
•1956. Hungarian-Austrian Agreement
18. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•New frontier water agreements
•after the political regime changes
•1993, 1997. Hungarian-Ukrainian Agreement
•Slovakia became the partner in the former
Hungarian-Czecho-Slovakian
Agreement
• Serbia became the partner in the former
Hungarian-Yugoslavian Agreement
•1994. Hungarian-Croatian Agreement
•1994. Hungarian-Slovenian Agreement
•2003. New Hungarian-Roumanian Agreement
19. •The structure of the frontier water
commissions
•By catchment principle:
–e.g. Tisza Subcommission in HU-SK relation
–Danube and Dráva Subc. in HU-CRO relation
•By technical or administrative principle:
–Water Management Subcommission
–Hidrometeorological Subcommission
–Financing Subcommission
20. •Important tasks of water
commissions:
•- water level and volume measurements
•- checking the state of the dykes and the
hydrotechnical
constructions
•- flood protection
•- agreement of development and technical
plans
•- water balance
•- water quality measurements and evaluation
•- regulate activities, create subcommissions,
working groups.
21. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Hungarian-Austrian Water Commission
•Most traditional agreement and
Commission
•Catchment areas: Lake of Fertı, Ikva,
•Pinka, Hanság, Rába, Lapincs rivers
•Operational and preparatory activities
•managed by the Water Subcommission
•(agreed licencing of flood protection
works)
•Working Group for Water Quality
Control
22. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Hungarian-Slovakian Commission
• of Frontier Waters
•Danube Subcommission (flood protection)
•Ipoly Subcommission (flood protection)
•Tisza Subcommission (flood protection)
•Water Quality Control Subcommission
•Financial Expert Group
•Hydrological Expert Group (forecast)
•WFD Expert Group
23. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Hungarian-Ukrainian Frontier Water
•Agreement
•Water Demage Mitigation Group of
Experts
•(Yearly inspection of dykes, canals and
water management constructions,
mutual acceptance of
development plans)
•Water Quality Control GoE
•Hydrological and Water Management
GoE
24. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Hungarian-Roumanian Water
•Commission
•Flood and Inland Water
Subcommission
•(Yearly inspection, special
regulation)
•Hydrometeorological
Subcommission
•(Flood forecast)
•Longterm WM
PlanningSubcommission
25. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Hungarian-Serbian Water
• Management Commission
•The 1955. HU-YUG Agreement is
considered valid by both parties
•Interruption of co-operation by civil
Interruption
war
•Water Demage Mitigation
Subcommission
•(Yearly flood protection inspection,
icebreaker cooperation on Danube)
•Water Management Subcommission
26. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Permanent Hungarian-Croatian Water
• Management Commission
•Danube and Drava Basin
Subcommission
•(flood protection competence,
development of flood forecasting, new
Drava Atlas)
•Mura Subcommission
• (flood protection competence)
•Water Quality Control
27. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Permanent Hungarian-Slovenian Water
• Management Commission
•Working Group of Water Management
• cofinancing of the construction and
maintanence of Kebele/Kobijlski
Reservoir
•Working Group of Water Quality
Control
29. • Common Hungarian-Ukrainian hydrographic telemeasuring system
•Hazai területen 33 db távmérı •Kárpátalján 35 db távmérı
állomás: állomás:
•19 db vízrajzi 25 db vízrajzi
•2 db hidrometeorológiai • (10 URH, 15 Mőhold.)
•3 db ultrahangos vízhozammérı 10 db hidromet.
T
Jelmagyarázat:
• (5 URH, 5 Mőholdas)
a
a oc
p
•5 db automata talajvízkút
O
Lb r
Malomrét Vízgyőjtı határ
oly
na
d
Országhatár
v
•3 db automata szivattyútelep
a
Csapadék és léghı-
Nagyberezna mérséklet
ta
•1 db torkolati mőtárgy Lju Sóhát
Alsóverecke
Alsóhideg-
Vízállás
Vízállás TACIS
VÁK IA patak
SZLO
a
rj
Turjamezı Csapadék TACIS
u
Vezér-
T
g
Un szállás Fülöpfalva Toronya
Vízállás USGS
Polena Repenye
UNGVÁR Zalomiszko Pláj Ökörmezı Csapadék USGS
központ
átjátszó Alsókalocsa
átjátszó Vízminıség
a Munkács Szolyva
rc
L to
a Távmérı központ
U
Alsókalocsa
K
(Rókarét)
R
Záhony Alsóremete Dolha
A
Szabolcs-
JN
g
r
Királymezı
o
ro veresmar t Huszt
yá
g Kraszna
b
od a g
A
ors Na
aa
átjátszó
T
B Körösmezı
B Huszt
iz
Tl
Dragobrat
sa
Dombrád
a
K só
átjátszó
c
z
az
s
a
T
a
-i
T za
r
i z
Ts
Huszt
a
is Nyéresháza
te
T
Vásáros- (Tiszakirva)
ke
namény Rahó
e
Tiszabercel
F
Tivadar Tiszabecs átjátszó
s.
y- fõc Kaszómezı
TOKAJ nya Sonkád Láposmezı
Ló Rahó
Técsı
Kótaj
Tunyog- Garbolc T za
is Nagybocskó
Kántor- Kocsord matolcs V.oroszi
NYÍREGYHÁZA jánosi Túr
KÖZPONT
Iza
R
O
V
is
Cs s rs llá s
á zá zá Csenger
M
ó
Nagyecsed S m os
za
Á
N
IA
Ágerdımajor
NAGY ÁNY
B A
o s ós
á p Als zõc s
Als zopor
ós Nag yb úny Mac s m ezõ L
ka
r za
Sülelm ed
K sn
Magyarlá p os
a
Na szód
e
os rc
S m zte
Zilah za
Bes
Dés B zterc e
es
Hída lm ás
s
á
lm
S m osújvár
za
A
os
m
Borsa
a
-z
isS
K
Kolozsvá r
Béles
os
S ida
m os za m
g -Sza m g -S
M e le H id e
Pola na
Horea
30. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•HU-UA Telemeasuring System
• In HU territory: 19 hydrographic stations
• 2 hydromet.
stations
» 3 URH water discharge st.
» 5 aut. groundwater wells
» 3 aut. pumping stations
» 1 outlet structure
• In UA territory: 10 URH hydrogr. stations
• •
15 satellite hydrogr.
stations
» 5 URH hydromet. stations
» 5 satellite hydromet. st.
31. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Hungarian technical assistance for
•neighbouring countries I.
•
• In 2001: dyke breach on Upper Tisza in
Hungarian
• territory. Hungarian assistance for pumping
out the excess water in Ukrainian territory
(1 month).
•
• In 2001 and in 2008: Hungarian Government
provided support to Ukraine for
the development
32. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Hungarian technical assistance for
•neighbouring countries II.
• In 2004: pumping provided on Serbian
territory
• by the Lower Tisza Directorate (Szeged)
•
• In 2005: dyke breach on Temes/Timis river in
• Roumania. The Hungarian Flood Protection
Service with mobile pumps helped to free a
flooded Roumanian pumping station and then
• together with Roumanian colleagues
pumped out the water from the flooded
territory.
33. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Hungarian icebreakers on the Serbian
•and Croatian Danube river section
•By a special contract Hungarian icebreakers
used to provide technical assistance for
Yugoslavian authorities on the Danube
(1964/65, 1985/86). Other occasions
preparedness were provided.
•This bilateral cooperation continued
trilaterally
•(HU-SE-CRO)
•Special expert group meets every December
34. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Hungarian-Slovenian Transboundary
•Cooperation
•Heavy floods in 1998 and 2005 on Kebele/
•Kobijlski watercourse
•Common study on the Kebele/Kobiljski
•catchment to stop the the high floods
•(Vodnogospodarski inštitut Ljubljana
• VIZITERV Budapest)
•INTERREG IIIA SLO-HU-CRO Neighbourhood
Programme 2004-2006
• cofinancing of the construction and
maintanence of Kebele/Kobiljski Emergency
Reservoir
35. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Financing of Kebele/Koiljski
• Emergency Reservoir
•EU support by the Structural Fund:1.090.949
EUR
• from this sum for Hungary: 690.130 EUR
• for Slovenia: 400.819
EUR
•Hungarian contribution: 414.077 EUR
•Slovenian contribution: 969.859 EUR
•Total cost: 2.474.885 EUR
•Ratio of financing: 44% HU, 56% SLO
36. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Results:
• Flood protection of 3 Hungarian and 5
Slovenian settlement solved by the project
• The reservoir retains 40% of the
1%probability
• flood for 3-5 days
•Provides regulated conveyance of floods on
the River Lendva and its tributaries
•Provides possibility for water quality control
38. •Tisza Water Forum 2001-2004.
•
•WG I. National characteristics of the Tisza River Basin
(Yugoslavia)
•WG II. Description of the flood control situation by
countries (Romania)
•WG III. Increase of lead time available for preparation
(Hungary)
•WG IV. Definition of the design flood levels (Slovakia)
•WG V. Implementation of the necessary measures
(lUkraine)
•WG VI. Environmental impact assessment (Slovakia)
•WG VII. International co-operation, legal framework
(Hungary)
•WG VIII. Integrating the outputs (Romania)
39. •Tisza Water Forum Summary
•
•Five lateral ministerial meeting initiated in
2001
•Concrete results in 4 Working Groups, but
could not achieve concrete common project
• Tisza River Basin Flood Control Concept
(2002)
• Contacts with EU
• The results of the Forum were integrated
into the ICPDR Tisza Group activity (2004)
•
40. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•ICPDR Co-operation in the field
•of flood protection
•1994. Sofia Convention on the Cooperation for
the Protection and Sustainable Use of the
Danube
•2000. Action Plan for Sustainable Flood
Prevention
• 2002. Flood Protection Working Group
•2004. Adoption of Action Plan
•2007. EU Flood Directive
•2008. First Report on Achievements for the
Public
•2009. Overview of flood monitoring systems
41. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Targets of Flood Action Plan
•Improvement of forecasts
•Preparation and coordination of sub-
basin action plans
•Fora for expert knowledge exchange
•Recommendation for common
approach and evaluation of flood
risks
42. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Cooperation by the EU Flood Directive
•2007. Issue of EU Flood Directive
• Aim: to reduce risks
•2011. Preliminary Flood Risk
Assesment
•2013. Flood risk management maps
•2015. Flood risk management plans
43. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•ICPDR projects and programs
•TISAR 2007: Joint implementation of
WFD and Flood D. in the Tisza river
basin
• (Development of Flood Mgmt.
Strategy)
•UNDP/GEF Tisza MPS: testing wetland
and floodplain management
• (3 demonstration projects with flood
component: practical
implementations
44. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Other international
•projects
•Danube Floodrisk: Risk mapping and
data collection by 8 riparian countries
(ICPDR)
•Ceframe: Central European Flood
Risk Assesment for the Lajta river (HU-
AT-SK)
•Pro Raab: Development of flood
forecasting on the Rába river (HU-AT)
45. •Zagreb, 13-14. December 2011.
•Conclusions
•The flood protection is very important
in transboundary relations
(monitoring, forecast, risk
assesment, emergency
cooperation must be developed).
•The bilateral and multilateral
cooperation must be harmonized.
•The bilateral projects must be
developed to regional ones
depending from situation.