The document discusses a scenario where a panel has asked a team to study the potential impacts of an eruption of Mt. Rainier that is similar in magnitude to the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo in the Philippines. The team will use the PBL model and Earth system science approach to prepare a response. They identify what is known, such as the community's concerns, and what is unknown, like the eruption patterns and regional climate and topography. The team needs to develop an early warning system, evacuation plan, and salvage priority plan to protect resources. The problem statement is that a Mt. Rainier eruption would affect the region's population, flora and fauna, and natural resources

1. Albert Rodriguez
EDTC 6341.61
Volcano Scenario
PBL Model
1. Read and analyze the volcano scenario.
Mt. Pinatubo
In 1991, Mt. Pinatubo in the Philippines exploded into Earth's second
largest volcanic eruption this century. This eruption deposited more
than 1 cubic mile (5 cubic kilometers) of volcanic ash and rock
fragments on the volcano's slopes. Within hours, heavy rains began to
wash this material down into the surrounding lowlands in giant, fast-
moving lahars. In the next four rainy seasons, lahars carried about half
of the deposits off the volcano, causing even more destruction in the
lowlands than the eruption itself.
Situation
A Washington State panel comprised of business people, state
congressional representatives, and concerned citizens have contacted
your team for advice. They want you to study the impact that Mt.
Rainier might have if it were to erupt with the same magnitude as the
Mt. Pinatubo eruption. You will use the PBL Model and the Earth
system science approach in preparing your response.
2. List personal understandings, ideas, or hunches?
a. I need to research Mt. Rainer in regards to location and its surroundings.
b. I believe every sphere will be affected by Mt. Rainer’s eruption.
c. I hypothesis that the eruption will disrupt the biosphere thus all flora and
fauna in balance with it within a radius reasonable to such an event.
d. It is my belief that there will be modifications to the immediate and
surrounding lithosphere with a lesser degree when factoring in distance.
e. It would be safe to inference that the hydrosphere will be affected, (i.e.
buried, contaminated, temperature altered), to equivalently affect its
dependent marine life.
3. List what is known.
a. The community’s concern on a potential threat to their well-being.
b. The possibility of all of Earth’s spheres being affected.
c. The existing possibility of an eruption that can be as severe as Mt.
Pinatubo, from where hard data has been gathered to prove – beyond a

2. Albert Rodriguez
EDTC 6341.61
reasonable doubt – that such an event to destroy, disrupt, and/or forever
change a region’s way of life.
4. List what is unknown.
a. The eruption patterns of Mt. Rainer.
b. The climate patterns of Mt. Rainer’s region.
c. The region’s topography and pathways of lesser resistance in conjunction
to the surrounding communities and their interests.
d. The area’s game and wildlife, natural resources, and other populations’
interdependent of this region.
e. To what degree the spheres would be affected.
5. List what needs to be done.
a. An early warning system to be put into place by experts in the field.
b. An evacuation plan linked with shelters and all their components.
c. Establish a “salvage-priority-plan” to protect necessary resources to
continue business, healthcare, education, and government.
6. Develop a problem statement.
An eruption from Mt. Rainer will affect the region’s population, flora and
fauna, and natural resources based on the effects on the Earth’s spheres.