SlideShare a Scribd company logo
PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 0 54% 31 11 15 57 41% 24 19 15 58 63% 37 10 12 59
Bonham 0 63% 53 21 10 84 55% 49 23 17 89 61% 68 18 26 112
Bowie 0 38% 16 17 9 42 33% 14 16 13 43 67% 38 9 10 57
Crockett 0 81% 21 2 3 26 49% 27 18 10 55 45% 25 15 15 55
Dishman 0 53% 23 14 6 43 65% 32 14 3 49 66% 37 10 9 56
Houston 0 40% 27 24 16 67 46% 37 24 20 81 56% 32 11 14 57
Jefferson 0 47% 18 10 10 38 51% 27 11 15 53 70% 33 8 6 47
Lamar 0 48% 29 19 12 60 39% 30 23 23 76 48% 31 18 16 65
Long 0 60% 53 15 21 89 56% 47 21 16 84 56% 57 25 20 102
Means 0 53% 30 15 12 57 64% 48 17 10 75 74% 53 13 6 72
Milam 0 36% 21 10 27 58 35% 19 12 23 54 53% 25 5 17 47
Rodriguez 0 51% 42 21 20 83 40% 45 37 30 112 54% 50 15 27 92
Stuart 0 63% 59 20 14 93 65% 70 25 12 107 71% 84 27 8 119
Travis 0 49% 23 11 13 47 38% 19 15 16 50 55% 29 15 9 53
Treasure Hills 0 53% 56 28 21 105 62% 84 24 28 136 74% 104 25 11 140
Wilson 0 65% 33 11 7 51 58% 37 18 9 64 76% 53 13 4 70
Zavala 0 52% 28 10 16 54 45% 26 18 14 58 54% 29 11 14 54
3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 64% 34 14 5 53 51% 25 15 9 49 56% 28 10 12 50 All Students assessed on campus
Bonham 58% 64 34 13 111 59% 66 24 21 111 65% 62 20 13 95 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Bowie 65% 34 15 3 52 69% 33 6 9 48 64% 35 13 7 55 Source: Istation
Crockett 64% 39 13 9 61 42% 30 24 18 72 63% 31 8 10 49 Data pulled: 9/14/17
Dishman 63% 29 13 4 46 60% 26 5 12 43 49% 25 16 10 51 * PREK's first assessment is taken in October
Houston 57% 40 17 13 70 52% 35 20 12 67 79% 42 4 7 53 For Internal Use Only
Jefferson 75% 27 5 4 36 69% 24 6 5 35 78% 39 7 4 50
Lamar 41% 40 28 30 98 41% 47 30 39 116 55% 54 23 21 98
Long 59% 54 21 16 91 70% 70 18 12 100 64% 70 22 17 109
Means 64% 59 20 13 92 68% 61 16 13 90 73% 60 10 12 82
Milam 50% 34 18 16 68 57% 32 4 20 56 66% 43 7 15 65
Rodriguez 56% 55 19 25 99 50% 62 32 30 124 65% 65 17 18 100
Stuart 76% 94 25 5 124 75% 98 22 11 131 79% 85 16 7 108
Travis 44% 21 18 9 48 74% 34 5 7 46 64% 35 7 13 55
Treasure Hills 72% 99 24 15 138 70% 98 25 18 141 65% 86 31 16 133
Wilson 60% 44 20 9 73 53% 48 20 23 91 75% 53 10 8 71
Zavala 65% 41 13 9 63 63% 33 8 11 52 72% 39 9 6 54
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 0 25% 3 3 6 12 22% 2 3 4 9 36% 4 3 4 11
Bonham 0 0% 1 1 50% 1 1 2 26% 5 3 11 19
Bowie 0 29% 2 4 1 7 25% 2 4 2 8 43% 6 3 5 14
Crockett 0 100% 2 2 25% 5 9 6 20 44% 8 6 4 18
Dishman 0 100% 3 3 57% 4 1 2 7 56% 5 2 2 9
Houston 0 43% 3 3 1 7 45% 5 2 4 11 22% 2 1 6 9
Jefferson 0 50% 5 3 2 10 13% 2 5 8 15 78% 14 1 3 18
Lamar 0 100% 1 1 18% 4 8 10 22 30% 3 5 2 10
Long 0 25% 2 3 3 8 22% 2 3 4 9 50% 5 3 2 10
Means 0 0 100% 3 3 100% 4 4
Milam 0 31% 4 3 6 13 21% 4 1 14 19 39% 7 2 9 18
Rodriguez 0 0% 1 1 43% 3 1 3 7 29% 5 5 7 17
Stuart 0 36% 4 3 4 11 65% 11 3 3 17 67% 14 5 2 21
Travis 0 25% 2 4 2 8 6% 1 5 10 16 62% 8 2 3 13
Treasure Hills 0 44% 4 3 2 9 23% 3 1 9 13 67% 6 3 9
Wilson 0 100% 1 1 33% 2 4 6 100% 5 5
Zavala 0 50% 4 3 1 8 29% 2 4 1 7 56% 10 3 5 18
0 47% 102 35% 191 53% 223
3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 71% 5 1 1 7 17% 1 3 2 6 25% 1 2 1 4 Students with LEP Indicator (Y)
Bonham 44% 4 4 1 9 30% 3 2 5 10 20% 1 1 3 5 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Bowie 59% 10 6 1 17 56% 9 3 4 16 56% 5 1 3 9 Source: Istation
Crockett 57% 13 6 4 23 47% 15 11 6 32 69% 11 5 16 Data pulled: 9/14/17
Dishman 50% 6 6 12 40% 2 1 2 5 38% 5 3 5 13 For Internal Use Only
Houston 25% 2 3 3 8 38% 5 6 2 13 57% 4 1 2 7
Jefferson 80% 12 1 2 15 67% 10 2 3 15 67% 12 3 3 18
Lamar 39% 16 10 15 41 36% 12 7 14 33 44% 12 7 8 27
Long 50% 5 5 10 40% 2 2 1 5 0% 3 3 6
Means 36% 8 8 6 22 58% 11 2 6 19 71% 12 2 3 17
Milam 47% 8 1 8 17 61% 11 2 5 18 33% 6 3 9 18
Rodriguez 36% 9 9 7 25 41% 9 4 9 22 33% 6 2 10 18
Stuart 60% 6 2 2 10 25% 3 6 3 12 88% 7 1 8
Travis 40% 6 6 3 15 75% 9 1 2 12 13% 1 2 5 8
Treasure Hills 58% 7 1 4 12 63% 5 1 2 8 43% 3 1 3 7
Wilson 56% 9 6 1 16 50% 6 4 2 12 83% 10 2 12
Zavala 57% 13 5 5 23 47% 8 3 6 17 67% 6 1 2 9
51% 282 47% 255 47% 202
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested 3RD Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 0 56% 5 1 3 9 25% 1 3 4 100% 1 1 0
Bonham 0 67% 8 2 2 12 73% 11 2 2 15 0 0
Bowie 0 50% 1 1 2 0% 1 1 0 50% 1 1 2
Crockett 0 67% 8 4 12 0 0 0
Dishman 0 0% 1 1 0 0 100% 1 1
Houston 0 67% 6 3 9 73% 8 3 11 0 75% 3 1 4
Jefferson 0 55% 6 2 3 11 57% 8 5 1 14 0 0
Lamar 0 37% 7 5 7 19 58% 18 4 9 31 73% 11 4 15 36% 12 8 13 33
Long 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0
Means 0 36% 5 5 4 14 72% 21 5 3 29 73% 22 7 1 30 50% 1 1 2
Milam 0 29% 5 3 9 17 39% 7 5 6 18 30% 8 8 11 27 26% 9 6 20 35
Rodriguez 0 38% 5 3 5 13 33% 4 3 5 12 0 33% 1 1 1 3
Stuart 0 36% 4 2 5 11 0 0 0% 1 1
Travis 0 38% 5 1 7 13 50% 8 2 6 16 33% 1 2 3 0% 1 1
Treasure Hills 0 40% 2 1 2 5 33% 1 2 3 0% 1 1 33% 1 2 3
Wilson 0 54% 7 4 2 13 80% 8 1 1 10 0 80% 4 1 5
Zavala 0 8% 1 4 7 12 0 67% 2 1 3 0
0 42% 173 49% 164 54% 80 44% 90
~~ No students assessed in Español for September
All Students assessed in Español
Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Source: Istation
Data pulled: 9/14/17 For Internal Use Only
* PREK's first assessment is taken in October
Istation Reading Español SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage
Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 0 25% 1 3 4 25% 1 1 2 4 13% 1 2 5 8
Bonham 0 100% 1 1 0 33% 2 2 2 6
Bowie 0 0 0% 1 1 100% 2 2
Crockett 0 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 0% 1 4 5
Dishman 0 50% 1 1 2 100% 1 1 33% 1 2 3
Houston 0 0% 1 1 25% 1 3 4 0% 4 4
Jefferson 0 0 0% 1 1 2 40% 2 1 2 5
Lamar 0 0 25% 1 3 4 0% 1 6 7
Long 0 33% 1 2 3 17% 1 2 3 6 17% 2 1 9 12
Means 0 0 0% 3 3 67% 4 2 6
Milam 0 0% 2 2 0% 2 2 50% 1 1 2
Rodriguez 0 33% 1 2 3 17% 1 1 4 6 25% 1 3 4
Stuart 0 67% 2 1 3 20% 1 1 3 5 100% 2 2
Travis 0 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 50% 1 1 2
Treasure Hills 0 80% 4 1 5 33% 1 1 1 3 33% 1 1 1 3
Wilson 0 100% 1 1 0% 1 1 0
Zavala 0 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 3 2 5 67% 2 1 3
0 41% 32 16% 49 39% 74
3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested
Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 #
Austin 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 2 4 6 13% 1 1 6 8 Students with Special Education Indicator (Y)
Bonham 20% 1 2 2 5 17% 1 1 4 6 14% 1 2 4 7 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus
Bowie 0% 1 2 3 0% 1 4 5 0% 3 2 5 Source: Istation
Crockett 42% 5 7 12 0% 1 6 7 13% 1 1 6 8 Data pulled: 9/14/17
Dishman 0% 2 1 3 0% 5 5 25% 1 1 2 4 For Internal Use Only
Houston 13% 1 7 8 11% 1 2 6 9 50% 5 5 10
Jefferson 33% 1 2 3 0 0% 1 1 2
Lamar 0% 8 8 0% 9 9 0% 8 8
Long 7% 1 3 10 14 0% 3 8 11 6% 1 5 10 16
Means 0% 1 2 3 50% 1 1 2 25% 2 6 8
Milam 17% 1 2 3 6 0% 7 7 14% 1 6 7
Rodriguez 25% 2 6 8 25% 2 3 3 8 7% 1 1 12 14
Stuart 100% 1 1 33% 2 4 6 0% 1 1 2
Travis 0% 1 3 4 25% 1 3 4 11% 1 1 7 9
Treasure Hills 33% 3 1 5 9 17% 2 3 7 12 25% 1 3 4
Wilson 9% 1 5 5 11 10% 1 3 6 10 36% 4 1 6 11
Zavala 33% 1 2 3 33% 2 4 6 13% 1 3 4 8
22% 106 14% 113 15% 131
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for SPED
Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
*1stAssessmentinOctober

More Related Content

More from albertrodriguez5150

District calendar-2019-2020
District calendar-2019-2020District calendar-2019-2020
District calendar-2019-2020
albertrodriguez5150
 
Early spanish reading power point
Early spanish reading power pointEarly spanish reading power point
Early spanish reading power point
albertrodriguez5150
 
Esperanza update 020618
Esperanza update 020618Esperanza update 020618
Esperanza update 020618
albertrodriguez5150
 
Ode' to bilingual education
Ode' to bilingual educationOde' to bilingual education
Ode' to bilingual education
albertrodriguez5150
 
Ode' to Bilingual Education
Ode' to Bilingual EducationOde' to Bilingual Education
Ode' to Bilingual Education
albertrodriguez5150
 
Why garden
Why gardenWhy garden
Action plan
Action planAction plan
Action plan
albertrodriguez5150
 
Design team 3
Design team 3Design team 3
Design team 3
albertrodriguez5150
 
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)albertrodriguez5150
 
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguezReviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguezalbertrodriguez5150
 

More from albertrodriguez5150 (20)

District calendar-2019-2020
District calendar-2019-2020District calendar-2019-2020
District calendar-2019-2020
 
Early spanish reading power point
Early spanish reading power pointEarly spanish reading power point
Early spanish reading power point
 
Esperanza update 020618
Esperanza update 020618Esperanza update 020618
Esperanza update 020618
 
Ode' to bilingual education
Ode' to bilingual educationOde' to bilingual education
Ode' to bilingual education
 
Ode' to Bilingual Education
Ode' to Bilingual EducationOde' to Bilingual Education
Ode' to Bilingual Education
 
Why garden
Why gardenWhy garden
Why garden
 
Action plan
Action planAction plan
Action plan
 
Design team 3
Design team 3Design team 3
Design team 3
 
Vocabulous jan 30
Vocabulous jan 30Vocabulous jan 30
Vocabulous jan 30
 
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
Jefferson elemknowsneedtoknows (1)
 
Iu 5 final
Iu 5 finalIu 5 final
Iu 5 final
 
Rubric
RubricRubric
Rubric
 
Rubric
RubricRubric
Rubric
 
Assessment for iu 5
Assessment for iu 5Assessment for iu 5
Assessment for iu 5
 
Rubric for iu 5
Rubric for iu 5Rubric for iu 5
Rubric for iu 5
 
Strengths in the addie model
Strengths in the addie modelStrengths in the addie model
Strengths in the addie model
 
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguezReviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
Reviewer feedback for iu1 albert rodriguez
 
Tac2010 standardsetting
Tac2010 standardsettingTac2010 standardsetting
Tac2010 standardsetting
 
How the moon affects the earth
How the moon affects the earthHow the moon affects the earth
How the moon affects the earth
 
Jefferson 4th grade moon menu
Jefferson 4th grade moon menuJefferson 4th grade moon menu
Jefferson 4th grade moon menu
 

Recently uploaded

Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Tamralipta Mahavidyalaya
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
EverAndrsGuerraGuerr
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
Sandy Millin
 
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxStudents, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
EduSkills OECD
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
EugeneSaldivar
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
Celine George
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
JosvitaDsouza2
 
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chipsFish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
GeoBlogs
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Mohd Adib Abd Muin, Senior Lecturer at Universiti Utara Malaysia
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
TechSoup
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
DeeptiGupta154
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
Vivekanand Anglo Vedic Academy
 
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideasThe geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
GeoBlogs
 
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative ThoughtsHow to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
Col Mukteshwar Prasad
 
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumersBasic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
PedroFerreira53928
 
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptxMARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
bennyroshan06
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Balvir Singh
 
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement EssentialsIntroduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Excellence Foundation for South Sudan
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Jisc
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdfHome assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
Home assignment II on Spectroscopy 2024 Answers.pdf
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
 
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...
 
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptxStudents, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
Students, digital devices and success - Andreas Schleicher - 27 May 2024..pptx
 
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...TESDA TM1 REVIEWER  FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
TESDA TM1 REVIEWER FOR NATIONAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND ORAL QUESTIONS WITH A...
 
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
 
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chipsFish and Chips - have they had their chips
Fish and Chips - have they had their chips
 
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptxChapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
Chapter 3 - Islamic Banking Products and Services.pptx
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
 
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with MechanismOverview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
Overview on Edible Vaccine: Pros & Cons with Mechanism
 
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free downloadThe French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
The French Revolution Class 9 Study Material pdf free download
 
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideasThe geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
The geography of Taylor Swift - some ideas
 
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative ThoughtsHow to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
How to Break the cycle of negative Thoughts
 
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
GIÁO ÁN DẠY THÊM (KẾ HOẠCH BÀI BUỔI 2) - TIẾNG ANH 8 GLOBAL SUCCESS (2 CỘT) N...
 
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumersBasic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
Basic phrases for greeting and assisting costumers
 
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptxMARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
MARUTI SUZUKI- A Successful Joint Venture in India.pptx
 
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela TaraOperation Blue Star   -  Saka Neela Tara
Operation Blue Star - Saka Neela Tara
 
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement EssentialsIntroduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
Introduction to Quality Improvement Essentials
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
 

Istation Report - 1 September

  • 1. PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 0 54% 31 11 15 57 41% 24 19 15 58 63% 37 10 12 59 Bonham 0 63% 53 21 10 84 55% 49 23 17 89 61% 68 18 26 112 Bowie 0 38% 16 17 9 42 33% 14 16 13 43 67% 38 9 10 57 Crockett 0 81% 21 2 3 26 49% 27 18 10 55 45% 25 15 15 55 Dishman 0 53% 23 14 6 43 65% 32 14 3 49 66% 37 10 9 56 Houston 0 40% 27 24 16 67 46% 37 24 20 81 56% 32 11 14 57 Jefferson 0 47% 18 10 10 38 51% 27 11 15 53 70% 33 8 6 47 Lamar 0 48% 29 19 12 60 39% 30 23 23 76 48% 31 18 16 65 Long 0 60% 53 15 21 89 56% 47 21 16 84 56% 57 25 20 102 Means 0 53% 30 15 12 57 64% 48 17 10 75 74% 53 13 6 72 Milam 0 36% 21 10 27 58 35% 19 12 23 54 53% 25 5 17 47 Rodriguez 0 51% 42 21 20 83 40% 45 37 30 112 54% 50 15 27 92 Stuart 0 63% 59 20 14 93 65% 70 25 12 107 71% 84 27 8 119 Travis 0 49% 23 11 13 47 38% 19 15 16 50 55% 29 15 9 53 Treasure Hills 0 53% 56 28 21 105 62% 84 24 28 136 74% 104 25 11 140 Wilson 0 65% 33 11 7 51 58% 37 18 9 64 76% 53 13 4 70 Zavala 0 52% 28 10 16 54 45% 26 18 14 58 54% 29 11 14 54 3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 64% 34 14 5 53 51% 25 15 9 49 56% 28 10 12 50 All Students assessed on campus Bonham 58% 64 34 13 111 59% 66 24 21 111 65% 62 20 13 95 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Bowie 65% 34 15 3 52 69% 33 6 9 48 64% 35 13 7 55 Source: Istation Crockett 64% 39 13 9 61 42% 30 24 18 72 63% 31 8 10 49 Data pulled: 9/14/17 Dishman 63% 29 13 4 46 60% 26 5 12 43 49% 25 16 10 51 * PREK's first assessment is taken in October Houston 57% 40 17 13 70 52% 35 20 12 67 79% 42 4 7 53 For Internal Use Only Jefferson 75% 27 5 4 36 69% 24 6 5 35 78% 39 7 4 50 Lamar 41% 40 28 30 98 41% 47 30 39 116 55% 54 23 21 98 Long 59% 54 21 16 91 70% 70 18 12 100 64% 70 22 17 109 Means 64% 59 20 13 92 68% 61 16 13 90 73% 60 10 12 82 Milam 50% 34 18 16 68 57% 32 4 20 56 66% 43 7 15 65 Rodriguez 56% 55 19 25 99 50% 62 32 30 124 65% 65 17 18 100 Stuart 76% 94 25 5 124 75% 98 22 11 131 79% 85 16 7 108 Travis 44% 21 18 9 48 74% 34 5 7 46 64% 35 7 13 55 Treasure Hills 72% 99 24 15 138 70% 98 25 18 141 65% 86 31 16 133 Wilson 60% 44 20 9 73 53% 48 20 23 91 75% 53 10 8 71 Zavala 65% 41 13 9 63 63% 33 8 11 52 72% 39 9 6 54 Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober
  • 2. PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 0 25% 3 3 6 12 22% 2 3 4 9 36% 4 3 4 11 Bonham 0 0% 1 1 50% 1 1 2 26% 5 3 11 19 Bowie 0 29% 2 4 1 7 25% 2 4 2 8 43% 6 3 5 14 Crockett 0 100% 2 2 25% 5 9 6 20 44% 8 6 4 18 Dishman 0 100% 3 3 57% 4 1 2 7 56% 5 2 2 9 Houston 0 43% 3 3 1 7 45% 5 2 4 11 22% 2 1 6 9 Jefferson 0 50% 5 3 2 10 13% 2 5 8 15 78% 14 1 3 18 Lamar 0 100% 1 1 18% 4 8 10 22 30% 3 5 2 10 Long 0 25% 2 3 3 8 22% 2 3 4 9 50% 5 3 2 10 Means 0 0 100% 3 3 100% 4 4 Milam 0 31% 4 3 6 13 21% 4 1 14 19 39% 7 2 9 18 Rodriguez 0 0% 1 1 43% 3 1 3 7 29% 5 5 7 17 Stuart 0 36% 4 3 4 11 65% 11 3 3 17 67% 14 5 2 21 Travis 0 25% 2 4 2 8 6% 1 5 10 16 62% 8 2 3 13 Treasure Hills 0 44% 4 3 2 9 23% 3 1 9 13 67% 6 3 9 Wilson 0 100% 1 1 33% 2 4 6 100% 5 5 Zavala 0 50% 4 3 1 8 29% 2 4 1 7 56% 10 3 5 18 0 47% 102 35% 191 53% 223 3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 71% 5 1 1 7 17% 1 3 2 6 25% 1 2 1 4 Students with LEP Indicator (Y) Bonham 44% 4 4 1 9 30% 3 2 5 10 20% 1 1 3 5 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Bowie 59% 10 6 1 17 56% 9 3 4 16 56% 5 1 3 9 Source: Istation Crockett 57% 13 6 4 23 47% 15 11 6 32 69% 11 5 16 Data pulled: 9/14/17 Dishman 50% 6 6 12 40% 2 1 2 5 38% 5 3 5 13 For Internal Use Only Houston 25% 2 3 3 8 38% 5 6 2 13 57% 4 1 2 7 Jefferson 80% 12 1 2 15 67% 10 2 3 15 67% 12 3 3 18 Lamar 39% 16 10 15 41 36% 12 7 14 33 44% 12 7 8 27 Long 50% 5 5 10 40% 2 2 1 5 0% 3 3 6 Means 36% 8 8 6 22 58% 11 2 6 19 71% 12 2 3 17 Milam 47% 8 1 8 17 61% 11 2 5 18 33% 6 3 9 18 Rodriguez 36% 9 9 7 25 41% 9 4 9 22 33% 6 2 10 18 Stuart 60% 6 2 2 10 25% 3 6 3 12 88% 7 1 8 Travis 40% 6 6 3 15 75% 9 1 2 12 13% 1 2 5 8 Treasure Hills 58% 7 1 4 12 63% 5 1 2 8 43% 3 1 3 7 Wilson 56% 9 6 1 16 50% 6 4 2 12 83% 10 2 12 Zavala 57% 13 5 5 23 47% 8 3 6 17 67% 6 1 2 9 51% 282 47% 255 47% 202 Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for LEP Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
  • 3. PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested 3RD Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 0 56% 5 1 3 9 25% 1 3 4 100% 1 1 0 Bonham 0 67% 8 2 2 12 73% 11 2 2 15 0 0 Bowie 0 50% 1 1 2 0% 1 1 0 50% 1 1 2 Crockett 0 67% 8 4 12 0 0 0 Dishman 0 0% 1 1 0 0 100% 1 1 Houston 0 67% 6 3 9 73% 8 3 11 0 75% 3 1 4 Jefferson 0 55% 6 2 3 11 57% 8 5 1 14 0 0 Lamar 0 37% 7 5 7 19 58% 18 4 9 31 73% 11 4 15 36% 12 8 13 33 Long 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 ~~ 0 Means 0 36% 5 5 4 14 72% 21 5 3 29 73% 22 7 1 30 50% 1 1 2 Milam 0 29% 5 3 9 17 39% 7 5 6 18 30% 8 8 11 27 26% 9 6 20 35 Rodriguez 0 38% 5 3 5 13 33% 4 3 5 12 0 33% 1 1 1 3 Stuart 0 36% 4 2 5 11 0 0 0% 1 1 Travis 0 38% 5 1 7 13 50% 8 2 6 16 33% 1 2 3 0% 1 1 Treasure Hills 0 40% 2 1 2 5 33% 1 2 3 0% 1 1 33% 1 2 3 Wilson 0 54% 7 4 2 13 80% 8 1 1 10 0 80% 4 1 5 Zavala 0 8% 1 4 7 12 0 67% 2 1 3 0 0 42% 173 49% 164 54% 80 44% 90 ~~ No students assessed in Español for September All Students assessed in Español Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Source: Istation Data pulled: 9/14/17 For Internal Use Only * PREK's first assessment is taken in October Istation Reading Español SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier
  • 4. PK Tested KG Tested 1ST Tested 2ND Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 0 25% 1 3 4 25% 1 1 2 4 13% 1 2 5 8 Bonham 0 100% 1 1 0 33% 2 2 2 6 Bowie 0 0 0% 1 1 100% 2 2 Crockett 0 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 0% 1 4 5 Dishman 0 50% 1 1 2 100% 1 1 33% 1 2 3 Houston 0 0% 1 1 25% 1 3 4 0% 4 4 Jefferson 0 0 0% 1 1 2 40% 2 1 2 5 Lamar 0 0 25% 1 3 4 0% 1 6 7 Long 0 33% 1 2 3 17% 1 2 3 6 17% 2 1 9 12 Means 0 0 0% 3 3 67% 4 2 6 Milam 0 0% 2 2 0% 2 2 50% 1 1 2 Rodriguez 0 33% 1 2 3 17% 1 1 4 6 25% 1 3 4 Stuart 0 67% 2 1 3 20% 1 1 3 5 100% 2 2 Travis 0 0% 1 1 0% 1 1 50% 1 1 2 Treasure Hills 0 80% 4 1 5 33% 1 1 1 3 33% 1 1 1 3 Wilson 0 100% 1 1 0% 1 1 0 Zavala 0 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 3 2 5 67% 2 1 3 0 41% 32 16% 49 39% 74 3RD Tested 4TH Tested 5TH Tested Campus SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # SEPT T1 T2 T3 # Austin 40% 2 1 2 5 0% 2 4 6 13% 1 1 6 8 Students with Special Education Indicator (Y) Bonham 20% 1 2 2 5 17% 1 1 4 6 14% 1 2 4 7 Tier 1 Percentages By Grade Level & Campus Bowie 0% 1 2 3 0% 1 4 5 0% 3 2 5 Source: Istation Crockett 42% 5 7 12 0% 1 6 7 13% 1 1 6 8 Data pulled: 9/14/17 Dishman 0% 2 1 3 0% 5 5 25% 1 1 2 4 For Internal Use Only Houston 13% 1 7 8 11% 1 2 6 9 50% 5 5 10 Jefferson 33% 1 2 3 0 0% 1 1 2 Lamar 0% 8 8 0% 9 9 0% 8 8 Long 7% 1 3 10 14 0% 3 8 11 6% 1 5 10 16 Means 0% 1 2 3 50% 1 1 2 25% 2 6 8 Milam 17% 1 2 3 6 0% 7 7 14% 1 6 7 Rodriguez 25% 2 6 8 25% 2 3 3 8 7% 1 1 12 14 Stuart 100% 1 1 33% 2 4 6 0% 1 1 2 Travis 0% 1 3 4 25% 1 3 4 11% 1 1 7 9 Treasure Hills 33% 3 1 5 9 17% 2 3 7 12 25% 1 3 4 Wilson 9% 1 5 5 11 10% 1 3 6 10 36% 4 1 6 11 Zavala 33% 1 2 3 33% 2 4 6 13% 1 3 4 8 22% 106 14% 113 15% 131 Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Istation Reading SEPTEMBER 2017 Assessment - Tier 1 Percentage for SPED Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier Student % by Tier *1stAssessmentinOctober