Vacuum Energy Theory Basics:
-Vacuum stores Energy (Space is Energy)
-Vacuum stores Energy with different capacities (Space has different densities of Energy).
-Vacuum with higher storing Capacity (Space with higher density of Energy) goes to upper location vertically relating to other Space Layers (as shown in the figure).
-The solar group has 9 Space layers (Mercury Level is the highest Layer vertically)
-Each Space Layer has different density of Energy (different Capacity)
-Each Space layer stores Energy….from this Energy the planet matter is created and the layer rest Energy is used as potential energy which will transferred into Kinetic Energy to be used for this planet motion.
-The relativistic effects (specifically Lorentz length contraction) leads to increase the Vacuum storing capacity of Energy (i.e. increase the Space density of Energy)
-The Previous description explains why the solar group motions trajectory is in a pyramid form.
-The solar group original Energy is provided by the Earth
Research 1st hypothesis discussion (ii) (revised)Gerges francis
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Paper Main Question
Why Does Uranus Orbital Distance = Saturn Orbital Diameter?
(Why does Saturn orbital distance = Saturn Uranus distance?)
Space Definition and Features
- Solar Planets are theater of puppets connecting by one trajectory of energy.
- Space is Energy and created as a result of light motion
- Uranus Orbital Distance is the solar system first distance created as a result of light motion for 1 second (1 second of light motion is equivalent to 1 solar day of planet motion – 3rd hypothesis)
- Saturn Orbital Distance is a defined distance by the solar system motion per a solar day
- Uranus and Saturn orbital distances are produced by one motion done in the same period of time by Earth Moon Effect.
- Earth Moon has no this great energy to effect on Saturn and Uranus orbital distances, but Earth Moon is the solar system general energy indicator and he defines where the energy will pass –that shows his effect secret.
Paper Question
Why Mercury Day Period =175.94 Solar Days?
Let's try to explain this question in following…
I suppose the solar system is one building and each planet is a part of it – for that reason – each planet data is created complementary to other planets data- and no planet is created individually…
Also– because the solar system is one building – so the solar system moves as a train- So as the train moves with its carriages together in one motion –regardless what's first carriage and what's last one – similar to the solar system moves with all planets together spite of Planets Different Velocities – the solar system general unified motion unify these velocities in one motion only –
Based on this description – each planet data effect on the solar system geometry
From this approach the question should be …
Why Mercury Day Period = 175.94 solar days…
But the deep question is another ….let's ask it in following…
Why Mercury Day Period is used in double value (=2 x 175.94 days) generally in the solar system geometry?
What does that mean? because the solar system is one building – so each planet data is used by other planets – and I have found that Mercury Day Period isn't used as 175.94 solar days but used usually as 351.8 (= 2 x 175.94) solar days –
So – I write this paper to prove this fact and I use it to support the claim that the solar system is one building and each planet data is complementary to the others
So
this paper has 2 objectives– (1st) to prove Mercury Day Period Using (2nd) to support the claim that the solar group is one building…
This paper proposes hypotheses about how the moon was originally a light beam and how its orbital motion relates to the creation of matter in the universe. It discusses how the moon may have transitioned from a light state to a matter state based on interactions with another light beam. The paper aims to follow the moon's progression from light beam to planet and back again in order to better understand how matter and space are created in the solar system. Key points discussed include the moon orbit being related to the distance traveled by a 1.16 mkm/sec light beam in 1 second, and how the moon's mass and gravity were created from its original light state.
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)Gerges francis
Why The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory is An Ellipse?(revised)
Abstract
1- Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory Is A Square (A Conclusion)
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory (because of Earth and moon motions)
3- Both forms of trajectory (square and circular) get interaction together and produce the ellipse trajectory as the planet motion final trajectory…. That's why the direct observation shows the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse (Kepler 1st Law is correct)
4- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim (i.e. the perihelion and aphelion points of planet motion trajectory proves that, this ellipse is produced by interaction between square and circular trajectories of motion)
5- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done because of Uranus and Neptune effects…
6- The interaction effect between the square and circular trajectories is found through the rate (4/π)
7- This effect is transported into the moon orbit in form (400/π) – and this transportation is done as Energy Transportation….
8- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
This paper completes the discussion in my previous paper
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
Mars Data Analysis proves the Rest Mass Concept is UnrealGerges francis
This document analyzes data from Mars and other planets in our solar system to argue that the concept of rest mass is incorrect. It presents equations showing relationships between planets' orbital periods, distances, and other properties. For example, it shows that Mars' axial tilt of 25 degrees appears as a constant in equations using Kepler's second law to relate orbital period and distance for each planet. It aims to prove that planets are deeply dependent on each other, rather than having independent, fixed masses. The goal is to establish an alternative view of the universe where mass is created and influenced by motion rather than being an intrinsic property. It uses Mars as an initial case study but plans to further analyze orbital distances, inclinations, and masses of other
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar System Geometrical Design depends on Mars and Pluto Motions
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Group is a machine of gears and each planet motion be used as a gear in it, the planets motions be integrated one another and create one unified motion.
- This vision tells, the solar system distances must be created as a network designed geometrically based on the planets positions and motions.
- The vision makes the solar group as a train and the planets as carriages in one train
- Accordingly, Planet motion can't be independent from the others'
- The dependency of motions among the planets depends on the planets motions periods, because each planet creates its own rate of time to perform the integration among the planets motions to create the planets unified general motion.
- Based on this vision, each planet position and motion data be defined in comparison with the other planets positions and data. As a result, the planets motions be similar to chess board pieces motions. each motion depends on the others and be calculated geometrically
- The vision disproves The Sun Mass Gravity Of Newton, and also Planet Motion Independency Concept which is inherited of Newton theory, because it tells the solar system moves by one geometrical design creates the planets data and motions.
- And
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury, and Pluto was the Mercury Moon.
- Some great strike caused Mars and Pluto to migrate from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
- By the planets migration, the solar system distances network be confused and needed a repair and by that, the solar system design takes Mars and Pluto as the basic 2 points to redesign the solar system distances Network
- The solar system design caused to create new 2 Planets (The moon and Saturn), to support the solar system redesign process.
Paper Objective
- The paper explains the solar system design, proving that Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken (this discussion be the paper part No. (II) under the title "The Solar System Creation Theory")
- The paper explains the changes be occurred by Mars and Pluto migration in the solar system design, proving the planets migration event (Part no. (I) of this paper under title (The Solar System Design Description)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Question
Can 2 Equal Gravity Forces effect On The Moon Motion Trajectory?
- We still try to understand the moon motion trajectory….
- How we reach to this question? Let's remember the argument….
- The moon moves 2.58 mkm daily = Earth motion distance, but because of Lorentz Length contraction phenomenon (rate 1.0725), the moon motion distance is contracted and became (2.41 mkm)… So the moon needs to move an additional distance = 0.17 mkm to cover this difference found by the contraction effect.
- The moon moves its daily displacement (88000 km) depends on Earth mass gravity force… But this distance is not enough, and the moon needs to move additional (88000 km) to cover the rest of distance…..
- Because (Earth Mass = total masses of Mercury + Venus + Mars + the moon) (difference 1%), I have suggested that, these 4 inner planets masses total produces a gravity force equal Earth gravity effect on the moon, and so, these 4 inner planets masses gravity causes the moon to move the additional distance (88000 km)
- The main difficulty in this explanation is the distances, because the 3 inner planets are so far from the moon but Earth is so close and because of that, this explanation can clearly be disproved, so I have to find a way to overcome the distances effect.
- I have suggested that, the 3 planets masses are distributed in some Specific Geometrical Building which saves the 3 planets gravity effect on any point inside its space, based on this idea, Venus mass gravity effects on the Earth moon as if this moon is Venus own moon and as if the distance between them is 0.5 million km and not 41.4 million km! it's (imaginary) solution for the problem, because we never see such geometrical structures for masses gravity forces… But (we have seen such for Electric Attraction Forces)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research 1st hypothesis discussion (ii) (revised)Gerges francis
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Paper Main Question
Why Does Uranus Orbital Distance = Saturn Orbital Diameter?
(Why does Saturn orbital distance = Saturn Uranus distance?)
Space Definition and Features
- Solar Planets are theater of puppets connecting by one trajectory of energy.
- Space is Energy and created as a result of light motion
- Uranus Orbital Distance is the solar system first distance created as a result of light motion for 1 second (1 second of light motion is equivalent to 1 solar day of planet motion – 3rd hypothesis)
- Saturn Orbital Distance is a defined distance by the solar system motion per a solar day
- Uranus and Saturn orbital distances are produced by one motion done in the same period of time by Earth Moon Effect.
- Earth Moon has no this great energy to effect on Saturn and Uranus orbital distances, but Earth Moon is the solar system general energy indicator and he defines where the energy will pass –that shows his effect secret.
Paper Question
Why Mercury Day Period =175.94 Solar Days?
Let's try to explain this question in following…
I suppose the solar system is one building and each planet is a part of it – for that reason – each planet data is created complementary to other planets data- and no planet is created individually…
Also– because the solar system is one building – so the solar system moves as a train- So as the train moves with its carriages together in one motion –regardless what's first carriage and what's last one – similar to the solar system moves with all planets together spite of Planets Different Velocities – the solar system general unified motion unify these velocities in one motion only –
Based on this description – each planet data effect on the solar system geometry
From this approach the question should be …
Why Mercury Day Period = 175.94 solar days…
But the deep question is another ….let's ask it in following…
Why Mercury Day Period is used in double value (=2 x 175.94 days) generally in the solar system geometry?
What does that mean? because the solar system is one building – so each planet data is used by other planets – and I have found that Mercury Day Period isn't used as 175.94 solar days but used usually as 351.8 (= 2 x 175.94) solar days –
So – I write this paper to prove this fact and I use it to support the claim that the solar system is one building and each planet data is complementary to the others
So
this paper has 2 objectives– (1st) to prove Mercury Day Period Using (2nd) to support the claim that the solar group is one building…
This paper proposes hypotheses about how the moon was originally a light beam and how its orbital motion relates to the creation of matter in the universe. It discusses how the moon may have transitioned from a light state to a matter state based on interactions with another light beam. The paper aims to follow the moon's progression from light beam to planet and back again in order to better understand how matter and space are created in the solar system. Key points discussed include the moon orbit being related to the distance traveled by a 1.16 mkm/sec light beam in 1 second, and how the moon's mass and gravity were created from its original light state.
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)Gerges francis
Why The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory is An Ellipse?(revised)
Abstract
1- Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory Is A Square (A Conclusion)
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory (because of Earth and moon motions)
3- Both forms of trajectory (square and circular) get interaction together and produce the ellipse trajectory as the planet motion final trajectory…. That's why the direct observation shows the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse (Kepler 1st Law is correct)
4- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim (i.e. the perihelion and aphelion points of planet motion trajectory proves that, this ellipse is produced by interaction between square and circular trajectories of motion)
5- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done because of Uranus and Neptune effects…
6- The interaction effect between the square and circular trajectories is found through the rate (4/π)
7- This effect is transported into the moon orbit in form (400/π) – and this transportation is done as Energy Transportation….
8- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
This paper completes the discussion in my previous paper
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
Mars Data Analysis proves the Rest Mass Concept is UnrealGerges francis
This document analyzes data from Mars and other planets in our solar system to argue that the concept of rest mass is incorrect. It presents equations showing relationships between planets' orbital periods, distances, and other properties. For example, it shows that Mars' axial tilt of 25 degrees appears as a constant in equations using Kepler's second law to relate orbital period and distance for each planet. It aims to prove that planets are deeply dependent on each other, rather than having independent, fixed masses. The goal is to establish an alternative view of the universe where mass is created and influenced by motion rather than being an intrinsic property. It uses Mars as an initial case study but plans to further analyze orbital distances, inclinations, and masses of other
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
-The Solar System Geometrical Design depends on Mars and Pluto Motions
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The Solar Group is a machine of gears and each planet motion be used as a gear in it, the planets motions be integrated one another and create one unified motion.
- This vision tells, the solar system distances must be created as a network designed geometrically based on the planets positions and motions.
- The vision makes the solar group as a train and the planets as carriages in one train
- Accordingly, Planet motion can't be independent from the others'
- The dependency of motions among the planets depends on the planets motions periods, because each planet creates its own rate of time to perform the integration among the planets motions to create the planets unified general motion.
- Based on this vision, each planet position and motion data be defined in comparison with the other planets positions and data. As a result, the planets motions be similar to chess board pieces motions. each motion depends on the others and be calculated geometrically
- The vision disproves The Sun Mass Gravity Of Newton, and also Planet Motion Independency Concept which is inherited of Newton theory, because it tells the solar system moves by one geometrical design creates the planets data and motions.
- And
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury, and Pluto was the Mercury Moon.
- Some great strike caused Mars and Pluto to migrate from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
- By the planets migration, the solar system distances network be confused and needed a repair and by that, the solar system design takes Mars and Pluto as the basic 2 points to redesign the solar system distances Network
- The solar system design caused to create new 2 Planets (The moon and Saturn), to support the solar system redesign process.
Paper Objective
- The paper explains the solar system design, proving that Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken (this discussion be the paper part No. (II) under the title "The Solar System Creation Theory")
- The paper explains the changes be occurred by Mars and Pluto migration in the solar system design, proving the planets migration event (Part no. (I) of this paper under title (The Solar System Design Description)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Question
Can 2 Equal Gravity Forces effect On The Moon Motion Trajectory?
- We still try to understand the moon motion trajectory….
- How we reach to this question? Let's remember the argument….
- The moon moves 2.58 mkm daily = Earth motion distance, but because of Lorentz Length contraction phenomenon (rate 1.0725), the moon motion distance is contracted and became (2.41 mkm)… So the moon needs to move an additional distance = 0.17 mkm to cover this difference found by the contraction effect.
- The moon moves its daily displacement (88000 km) depends on Earth mass gravity force… But this distance is not enough, and the moon needs to move additional (88000 km) to cover the rest of distance…..
- Because (Earth Mass = total masses of Mercury + Venus + Mars + the moon) (difference 1%), I have suggested that, these 4 inner planets masses total produces a gravity force equal Earth gravity effect on the moon, and so, these 4 inner planets masses gravity causes the moon to move the additional distance (88000 km)
- The main difficulty in this explanation is the distances, because the 3 inner planets are so far from the moon but Earth is so close and because of that, this explanation can clearly be disproved, so I have to find a way to overcome the distances effect.
- I have suggested that, the 3 planets masses are distributed in some Specific Geometrical Building which saves the 3 planets gravity effect on any point inside its space, based on this idea, Venus mass gravity effects on the Earth moon as if this moon is Venus own moon and as if the distance between them is 0.5 million km and not 41.4 million km! it's (imaginary) solution for the problem, because we never see such geometrical structures for masses gravity forces… But (we have seen such for Electric Attraction Forces)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (III)Gerges francis
The document discusses relativistic effects in the solar system motions. It hypothesizes that matter is created from light beams, so light motion features should be found in planetary motions. The document lists several light motion features that have been discovered in planetary data, including relativistic effects. It suggests relativistic light motion is hidden behind geometrical rules governing planetary motions.
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)Gerges francis
Paper objective
The paper provides (1-50) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion analysis – The questions are:
1- Why do Venus and Uranus rotate on their axes, or spin, in a clockwise direction?
2- Does aether wind exist?
3- What are the major and most effective refutations of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity? Question Asked December 6, 2019.
4- Which is the most convincing physical experiment (Not Thought Experiment) that conclusively validates Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity?
5- The advance of Mercury perihelion is achieved in Newtonian gravity
6- Is Gravity a Push or a Pull?
7- Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?
8- Life on Mars: Open discussion
9- What do you think about wave-particle duality?
10- Is there somebody who believes in the theory of Everett (multitude of universes)? Do Einstein's Field Equations allow multiple universes?
11- Do the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable distance in between them?
12- What's underline the Lorentz transformation? And what's the dimension of the space?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planets order disproves the gravity theoryGerges francis
Abstract
- The Solar Planets order proves that, the planet orbital distance is defined based on his Diameter and NOT his Mass, which disproves the Gravity Theory..
But
- Planet Diameter and Orbital Distance Relationship Equation is so hard to define…! Why?
Because
- The solar Group has 2 Heads (The Sun and Earth).
The Solar Group is A Dipole….
We need to modify the Solar Group Basic Description to be " A Dipole System"…
- This paper also discusses the Sun nature and Origin…
The paper discusses more deep the results of the basic Concept which is:
"Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
Why we have to suggest this concept?
Because
The Planet Motion shows Geometrical Effects And Rules Can't Be Explained By The Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Based on that– we have to find the player which creates these geometrical effects and rules if the Rigid Body Motion Mechanics can't create them
To solve this dilemma I have to suggest that there's a light beam motion hidden the planet motion
I have provided 9 proves (in Part II) and 4 other proves (in part VI) to show that the planets motions geometrical structures can't be explained by the Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
In the 4 proves of (Part VI) I have tried to prove that the distances are created because of the light motions - the data provides Strong & Clear Direction to support this claim.
So
The very near conclusion is that "Planet Moves Following For Light Motion"
Or
"The Planet & Light motions pass the same distance but with different rates of time"
The different rates of time are created as relativistic effects because we deal with light motions –
But
The next question will cause the serious discussion
"Now If The Light And Planet Pass The Same Distance by different rates of time- if it's fact- the question should be – "Are the events will be seen in double?" because – the same event is passed by light motion (at first) and then by the planet motion (at second) Where there's a difference in time between both motions because of the different rate of time between Planet and Light Motions?!"
Simply – Do We Live In A Universe Has Double Vision?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) (2)Gerges francis
- The document discusses the hypothesis that the solar system distances were created in a network form, rather than independently, based on analysis of planetary motion data.
- Key points made include that 50% of all distances in the solar system are equal to one another, and 40% are related by a ratio of 1.0725. This is said to directly prove the distances were created as part of a single geometrical design or network, rather than independently.
- The paper aims to prove that the distances network exists based on planetary data, and separately to explain how light motion could have created the distances in this networked form, with light velocities of 1.16 mkms and 0.3 mkms proposed to be involved.
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.3) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun is created after all solar planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun mass gravity decisively
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The paper analyzes the solar planet motion and compares it with Newton theory..
- Many new features be discovered and attributed to the planet motion and these features disprove also Newton theory in addition to the sun age theory.
1. Let's provide a list of these new discovered features in following:
2. The Solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion - By that the planets motions be similar to a machine of gears.
3. The Solar planets revolutions around the sun be done in equal periods of time
4. The Solar planets motions use different rates of time - by that the solar planets motions be similar to a great mechanical clock.
5. The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form. By that the solar system distances be similar to a chess board, each planet moves depending on the other planets motions and by using geometrical calculations
6. Mars and Pluto had migrated from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one?
1- The Cycle 2737 years is a real one
2- The Cycle 2737 years refers to the sun inner main changes
3- The Sun energy depends on the solar planets motions energies accumulation (and doesn't depend on any nuclear interactions occurring inside the sun)
i.e. the solar planets motions mechanical waves (Energy) are transferred into light waves (Energy= sun rays)
4- Solar planet motion energy is accumulated daily and technically by lorentz length contraction effect, where solar planet motion is a relativistic one.
5- Solar planet motion energy is concentrated inside the space regularly and technically by lorentz length contraction phenomenon, where the space stores Energy with different densities.
6- Solar Planets Motions Energies Total Produces The Sun Rays
7- The moon daily motion shows the lorentz contraction effects in the solar group, i.e. the Lorentz contraction effects are found daily and that means the planet usual daily motion causes lorentz effects which causes the Space stored energy to be concentrated..
The solar system design disproves newton theory (revised)Gerges francis
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Why Don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?Gerges francis
Why don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Because
Paper Hypothesis
- The Planets Motions are Motions of Light Beams, That means each planet motion depends on a motion of light beam – Based on that, we have to use the light geometry to explain the solar planets motions.
Shortly
- Planet Motion = Light Motion and should be studied under Relativistic Considerations
- Because we see the planets as matters move by low velocity– We consider that the light geometry is unsuitable science to explain the solar planets motions.
- That's Why – There Are Many Contradictions In The Solar Planets Motions Current Understanding And Description..
Paper Objective
- The Paper tries to prove the claim that
"The Solar Planets Motions Are Motions Of Light Beams"
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
Saturn Is The Last Planet Created In The Solar System
We complete our discussion about this hypothesis which we have started in the paper
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System?
The Idea Summary
- Saturn Data Is Similar To Other Planets Data – for example – Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference
- This data refers to that –Saturn may be created after Mars Creation (or vice versa) – but = because Saturn data depends on different planets data – for example – Saturn Diameter = Venus Circumference x π - So such data leads to the conclusion that Saturn may be created after all other planets – means – Saturn is the last planet created in the solar system
- Based on this claim we have 2 questions to discuss
o (1st Question) Can Any Planet Data Be Created Depending On Any Other Planet Data?
o (2nd Question) why Saturn data is created by these specific values? For example – Saturn orbital distance = Mars orbital circumference – based on that – I claim Saturn orbital distance is created depending on Mars orbital circumference – the question is – why? why Saturn doesn't any other planet orbital circumference? Why specially used Mars orbital circumference? And generally – if Saturn data is crated based on some planets data why Saturn used these specific planets data and other's
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1.There's a velocity =1.16 mkm /sec
2.Jupiter proves that "The Solar System Is One Machine"
3.The solar system is one machine of gears and each planet is a gear in this same machine.
4.Jupiter & the three inner planets are created depending on each other
5.Mars is created depending on Jupiter & Saturn cooperation
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
My Research Hypotheses
Abstract
During 2013-2019 I have studied the solar system geometry. Based on this study I have formed the following 5 basic hypotheses:
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Hypothesis No.2
Solar System moves as a train. i.e. A train moves with all its carriages together, similar to that – Solar Planets move together as one train in one unified motion (i.e. No Planet moves individually or independently from other planets motions)
Hypothesis No.3
Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on energy of light motion for 1 second period – that means – Planet moves following light motion – i.e. – Planet motion shows double motions – (1st) Light Motion (2nd) Its Follower Planet Motion
Hypothesis No.4
Solar System Unified Motion depends On Solar Day Period
Hypothesis No.5
Matter Creation process depends on solar day period of time – that means – Matter creation process depends on the time as one of its main components
In this paper I try to explain these 5 hypotheses and provide short proves for them
Paper Hypothesis
The Matter Is Created Based On The Light Beam Energy
The Hypothesis Explanation
The light motion is found before any matter creation –
- I suppose the planet is a point only- and this supposed point follows the light motion – means – the light basic job in the planet matter creation is to create the planet motion
- The planet matter (mass, volume …etc) is created as a function on this planet motion –
- The Planet motion concepts are:
o (1st) Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second
o (2nd) The planet matter is created based on this planet motion for 1 solar day
Paper Conclusion
o The Planet Matter Is Created Based on the light Motion & Energy
o The planet matter is created as a function on this planet motion
But
o The light moves but can't be changed into matter! Why?
Because
o Some change is happened for the light nature to enable the matter to be created – for example- Gamma rays (1.2 mev) can produce electron and position by double production experiment – means the matter creation is done by the light energy but the light nature needs some change to produce the matter
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon creation effect on the solar system geometry (revised)Gerges francis
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Question
Can Jupiter effect on Earth motion?
The Question Explanation
- 142984 km (Jupiter diameter) x 1047 = 149.6 mkm (Earth orbital distance)
- Where
- 1047 = The sun Mass / Jupiter Mass
- Many data shows that, Jupiter can effect on Earth & its moon motions, for example
- 10921 km (The moon circumference) x 449197 km (Jupiter circumference) = 4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference)
Paper Claim
- The masses gravity forces is one of many ways by which Planets motions can effect on each other- but it's not the only way – where there are many other ways by which far planets can effect on the inner planets motions
- These ways depend on the solar system geometrical design, because the geometrical rules based on which the solar planets data is created provide different ways of Planets motions effect ability on each other.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1.Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets proves that, "The Solar System Is One Machine"
2.Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets is done by A Light Beam Its Velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
3.Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets proves that m there's a light velocity =1.16 mkm /sec in the solar system.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar system motion analysis (questions and answers)Gerges francis
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
- This paper contains 5 questions and their answers concerning the solar system motion analysis
The Questions Are:
- Question no. (1). Why should The solar Planets Data Analysis be considered a basic tool in the solar system motion research? (page no. 2)
- Question no. (2) Can far planets (as Jupiter and Uranus) effect on the Earth moon motion? (page no. 5)
- Question no. (3) Can the classical mechanics explain the solar system motion? (page no. 14)
- Question no. (4) How The Sun Is Created? (page no. 18)
- Question no. (5) Why couldn't Titius Bode Law predict Neptune’s orbital distance? (page no. 34)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
In this paper we compare between the physics current theories which try to explain the solar system motions and the planets real data – this is a known process in physics
Example No. 1
Lorentz Length Contraction Phenomenon tells that- a particle with length L0 will be contracted to L1 when this particle travels with high velocity motion.
¬¬¬
So the question is – Why the particle length is contracted with high velocity motion?
Some physics books tell that, this contraction is just illusion of measurements!
That means, Lorentz Transformations measure illusions and not facts!
We refused that,
But if the particle own length contracted by high velocity motion –that will make the particle properties as a function of its motion – means –Particle mass is created by this particle motion
Newton told us a planet moves basically by masses gravity with the sun - so what's first and what's the second? what's the reason and what's the result
The mass causes the motion (Newton) or the motion defines the mass (Lorentz)?
Similar to this argument we will discuss how to discover the solar system.
Paper Objective
The paper tries to show that Jupiter Data can't be explained by the solar system current theories.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.2) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Pluto And The Moon Motions Are Effected By The Earth Motion.
The hypothesis Explanation
- I use the planets data analysis to discover the solar planets creation and motions.
- The planets data shows the following fact….
- Pluto Day Period be =153.3 hours because Pluto day period depends on The Earth moon day period (708.7h). That explains why Pluto day period is so long in comparison with the outer planets days periods. The fact is that, Pluto day period is created as a function in the Earth Moon Day Period.
- On the other side, the moon orbital apogee radius which should be = 413600 km became =406000 km because of Pluto motion effect on the moon orbital motion.
- Paper Objective
- Because no physics theory can give an explanation for such dependency found between 2 small masses planets which are at a huge distance between them, I have to prove this dependency between the 2 planets by all means. And as a result for these proves, we have to search after the method by which this dependency can be created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Kepler 3rd law explanation (a claim against nobel prize board decision in ph...Gerges francis
A claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision – in Physics -2018
Best Greetings
I send this paper as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board - for their decision - for Nobel Prize in physics 2018
Of course I have nothing against the great people who receive the Nobel Prize in Physics 2018 and I congratulate them for their great works
But at my side, I found there's a serious question here
Because I explained frequently in my research that, there's a serious contradiction in physics current theories and we can't understand the solar group geometry if no one solves this contradiction…
I Provided many hard arguments to prove this claim and thought that, the Nobel Prize Board will support me to solve this contradiction in physics.
But I found the Board decision avoids my work!
For that reason I summarized the main idea in this paper and send it as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board
And I wish the board will accept to give me a chance to explain and defend my point of view..
With the Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers
http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
The Space is Energy
This supports the claim
"There's A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance"
This paper discusses and tries to prove this fact
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (III)Gerges francis
The document discusses relativistic effects in the solar system motions. It hypothesizes that matter is created from light beams, so light motion features should be found in planetary motions. The document lists several light motion features that have been discovered in planetary data, including relativistic effects. It suggests relativistic light motion is hidden behind geometrical rules governing planetary motions.
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)Gerges francis
Paper objective
The paper provides (1-50) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion analysis – The questions are:
1- Why do Venus and Uranus rotate on their axes, or spin, in a clockwise direction?
2- Does aether wind exist?
3- What are the major and most effective refutations of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity? Question Asked December 6, 2019.
4- Which is the most convincing physical experiment (Not Thought Experiment) that conclusively validates Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity?
5- The advance of Mercury perihelion is achieved in Newtonian gravity
6- Is Gravity a Push or a Pull?
7- Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?
8- Life on Mars: Open discussion
9- What do you think about wave-particle duality?
10- Is there somebody who believes in the theory of Everett (multitude of universes)? Do Einstein's Field Equations allow multiple universes?
11- Do the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable distance in between them?
12- What's underline the Lorentz transformation? And what's the dimension of the space?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar planets order disproves the gravity theoryGerges francis
Abstract
- The Solar Planets order proves that, the planet orbital distance is defined based on his Diameter and NOT his Mass, which disproves the Gravity Theory..
But
- Planet Diameter and Orbital Distance Relationship Equation is so hard to define…! Why?
Because
- The solar Group has 2 Heads (The Sun and Earth).
The Solar Group is A Dipole….
We need to modify the Solar Group Basic Description to be " A Dipole System"…
- This paper also discusses the Sun nature and Origin…
The paper discusses more deep the results of the basic Concept which is:
"Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
Why we have to suggest this concept?
Because
The Planet Motion shows Geometrical Effects And Rules Can't Be Explained By The Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Based on that– we have to find the player which creates these geometrical effects and rules if the Rigid Body Motion Mechanics can't create them
To solve this dilemma I have to suggest that there's a light beam motion hidden the planet motion
I have provided 9 proves (in Part II) and 4 other proves (in part VI) to show that the planets motions geometrical structures can't be explained by the Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
In the 4 proves of (Part VI) I have tried to prove that the distances are created because of the light motions - the data provides Strong & Clear Direction to support this claim.
So
The very near conclusion is that "Planet Moves Following For Light Motion"
Or
"The Planet & Light motions pass the same distance but with different rates of time"
The different rates of time are created as relativistic effects because we deal with light motions –
But
The next question will cause the serious discussion
"Now If The Light And Planet Pass The Same Distance by different rates of time- if it's fact- the question should be – "Are the events will be seen in double?" because – the same event is passed by light motion (at first) and then by the planet motion (at second) Where there's a difference in time between both motions because of the different rate of time between Planet and Light Motions?!"
Simply – Do We Live In A Universe Has Double Vision?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity (Revised) (2)Gerges francis
- The document discusses the hypothesis that the solar system distances were created in a network form, rather than independently, based on analysis of planetary motion data.
- Key points made include that 50% of all distances in the solar system are equal to one another, and 40% are related by a ratio of 1.0725. This is said to directly prove the distances were created as part of a single geometrical design or network, rather than independently.
- The paper aims to prove that the distances network exists based on planetary data, and separately to explain how light motion could have created the distances in this networked form, with light velocities of 1.16 mkms and 0.3 mkms proposed to be involved.
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.3) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun is created after all solar planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun mass gravity decisively
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- The paper analyzes the solar planet motion and compares it with Newton theory..
- Many new features be discovered and attributed to the planet motion and these features disprove also Newton theory in addition to the sun age theory.
1. Let's provide a list of these new discovered features in following:
2. The Solar planets motions be integrated into one unified general motion - By that the planets motions be similar to a machine of gears.
3. The Solar planets revolutions around the sun be done in equal periods of time
4. The Solar planets motions use different rates of time - by that the solar planets motions be similar to a great mechanical clock.
5. The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form. By that the solar system distances be similar to a chess board, each planet moves depending on the other planets motions and by using geometrical calculations
6. Mars and Pluto had migrated from their original orbital distances to their current positions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one?
1- The Cycle 2737 years is a real one
2- The Cycle 2737 years refers to the sun inner main changes
3- The Sun energy depends on the solar planets motions energies accumulation (and doesn't depend on any nuclear interactions occurring inside the sun)
i.e. the solar planets motions mechanical waves (Energy) are transferred into light waves (Energy= sun rays)
4- Solar planet motion energy is accumulated daily and technically by lorentz length contraction effect, where solar planet motion is a relativistic one.
5- Solar planet motion energy is concentrated inside the space regularly and technically by lorentz length contraction phenomenon, where the space stores Energy with different densities.
6- Solar Planets Motions Energies Total Produces The Sun Rays
7- The moon daily motion shows the lorentz contraction effects in the solar group, i.e. the Lorentz contraction effects are found daily and that means the planet usual daily motion causes lorentz effects which causes the Space stored energy to be concentrated..
The solar system design disproves newton theory (revised)Gerges francis
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Why Don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?Gerges francis
Why don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Because
Paper Hypothesis
- The Planets Motions are Motions of Light Beams, That means each planet motion depends on a motion of light beam – Based on that, we have to use the light geometry to explain the solar planets motions.
Shortly
- Planet Motion = Light Motion and should be studied under Relativistic Considerations
- Because we see the planets as matters move by low velocity– We consider that the light geometry is unsuitable science to explain the solar planets motions.
- That's Why – There Are Many Contradictions In The Solar Planets Motions Current Understanding And Description..
Paper Objective
- The Paper tries to prove the claim that
"The Solar Planets Motions Are Motions Of Light Beams"
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
Saturn Is The Last Planet Created In The Solar System
We complete our discussion about this hypothesis which we have started in the paper
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System?
The Idea Summary
- Saturn Data Is Similar To Other Planets Data – for example – Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference
- This data refers to that –Saturn may be created after Mars Creation (or vice versa) – but = because Saturn data depends on different planets data – for example – Saturn Diameter = Venus Circumference x π - So such data leads to the conclusion that Saturn may be created after all other planets – means – Saturn is the last planet created in the solar system
- Based on this claim we have 2 questions to discuss
o (1st Question) Can Any Planet Data Be Created Depending On Any Other Planet Data?
o (2nd Question) why Saturn data is created by these specific values? For example – Saturn orbital distance = Mars orbital circumference – based on that – I claim Saturn orbital distance is created depending on Mars orbital circumference – the question is – why? why Saturn doesn't any other planet orbital circumference? Why specially used Mars orbital circumference? And generally – if Saturn data is crated based on some planets data why Saturn used these specific planets data and other's
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1.There's a velocity =1.16 mkm /sec
2.Jupiter proves that "The Solar System Is One Machine"
3.The solar system is one machine of gears and each planet is a gear in this same machine.
4.Jupiter & the three inner planets are created depending on each other
5.Mars is created depending on Jupiter & Saturn cooperation
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
My Research Hypotheses
Abstract
During 2013-2019 I have studied the solar system geometry. Based on this study I have formed the following 5 basic hypotheses:
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Hypothesis No.2
Solar System moves as a train. i.e. A train moves with all its carriages together, similar to that – Solar Planets move together as one train in one unified motion (i.e. No Planet moves individually or independently from other planets motions)
Hypothesis No.3
Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on energy of light motion for 1 second period – that means – Planet moves following light motion – i.e. – Planet motion shows double motions – (1st) Light Motion (2nd) Its Follower Planet Motion
Hypothesis No.4
Solar System Unified Motion depends On Solar Day Period
Hypothesis No.5
Matter Creation process depends on solar day period of time – that means – Matter creation process depends on the time as one of its main components
In this paper I try to explain these 5 hypotheses and provide short proves for them
Paper Hypothesis
The Matter Is Created Based On The Light Beam Energy
The Hypothesis Explanation
The light motion is found before any matter creation –
- I suppose the planet is a point only- and this supposed point follows the light motion – means – the light basic job in the planet matter creation is to create the planet motion
- The planet matter (mass, volume …etc) is created as a function on this planet motion –
- The Planet motion concepts are:
o (1st) Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on light motion for 1 second
o (2nd) The planet matter is created based on this planet motion for 1 solar day
Paper Conclusion
o The Planet Matter Is Created Based on the light Motion & Energy
o The planet matter is created as a function on this planet motion
But
o The light moves but can't be changed into matter! Why?
Because
o Some change is happened for the light nature to enable the matter to be created – for example- Gamma rays (1.2 mev) can produce electron and position by double production experiment – means the matter creation is done by the light energy but the light nature needs some change to produce the matter
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon creation effect on the solar system geometry (revised)Gerges francis
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Question
Can Jupiter effect on Earth motion?
The Question Explanation
- 142984 km (Jupiter diameter) x 1047 = 149.6 mkm (Earth orbital distance)
- Where
- 1047 = The sun Mass / Jupiter Mass
- Many data shows that, Jupiter can effect on Earth & its moon motions, for example
- 10921 km (The moon circumference) x 449197 km (Jupiter circumference) = 4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference)
Paper Claim
- The masses gravity forces is one of many ways by which Planets motions can effect on each other- but it's not the only way – where there are many other ways by which far planets can effect on the inner planets motions
- These ways depend on the solar system geometrical design, because the geometrical rules based on which the solar planets data is created provide different ways of Planets motions effect ability on each other.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
1.Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets proves that, "The Solar System Is One Machine"
2.Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets is done by A Light Beam Its Velocity =1.16 mkm/sec
3.Jupiter Effect On The Inner Planets proves that m there's a light velocity =1.16 mkm /sec in the solar system.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The solar system motion analysis (questions and answers)Gerges francis
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
- This paper contains 5 questions and their answers concerning the solar system motion analysis
The Questions Are:
- Question no. (1). Why should The solar Planets Data Analysis be considered a basic tool in the solar system motion research? (page no. 2)
- Question no. (2) Can far planets (as Jupiter and Uranus) effect on the Earth moon motion? (page no. 5)
- Question no. (3) Can the classical mechanics explain the solar system motion? (page no. 14)
- Question no. (4) How The Sun Is Created? (page no. 18)
- Question no. (5) Why couldn't Titius Bode Law predict Neptune’s orbital distance? (page no. 34)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
In this paper we compare between the physics current theories which try to explain the solar system motions and the planets real data – this is a known process in physics
Example No. 1
Lorentz Length Contraction Phenomenon tells that- a particle with length L0 will be contracted to L1 when this particle travels with high velocity motion.
¬¬¬
So the question is – Why the particle length is contracted with high velocity motion?
Some physics books tell that, this contraction is just illusion of measurements!
That means, Lorentz Transformations measure illusions and not facts!
We refused that,
But if the particle own length contracted by high velocity motion –that will make the particle properties as a function of its motion – means –Particle mass is created by this particle motion
Newton told us a planet moves basically by masses gravity with the sun - so what's first and what's the second? what's the reason and what's the result
The mass causes the motion (Newton) or the motion defines the mass (Lorentz)?
Similar to this argument we will discuss how to discover the solar system.
Paper Objective
The paper tries to show that Jupiter Data can't be explained by the solar system current theories.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Design Disproves Newton Theory (Revised No.2) Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Revolutions Around The Sun Be Done In Equal Periods of Time
Paper hypothesis Explanation
(I)
- The Solar Planets move as gears in one machine- each planet motion depends on the other planets motions.
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another to create one unified integrated motion.
- The unified integrated motion causes the planets revolutions around the sun to be done in equal periods of time, to save the timing adjustments of the planets motions to be integrated with one another.
- The equal periods causes the planets motions to use different rates of time to adjust the planets orbital distances increasing and their velocities decreasing
- The equal periods of time and the using of the different rates of time causes the solar system distances to be created in a network form
- The distances network means, the distances be created based on one geometrical design and be distributed as a network.
- This vision attributes 3 new features to the solar planets motions which are:
- (1) The Planets Move An Integrated Unified Motion
- (2) The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
- (3) The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- By that, the solar group be similar to a great mechanical clock, each planet works as a gear moves depending on the other planets motions and defines a part of the solar system general rate of time (the general rate of time is the solar day 86400s)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Pluto And The Moon Motions Are Effected By The Earth Motion.
The hypothesis Explanation
- I use the planets data analysis to discover the solar planets creation and motions.
- The planets data shows the following fact….
- Pluto Day Period be =153.3 hours because Pluto day period depends on The Earth moon day period (708.7h). That explains why Pluto day period is so long in comparison with the outer planets days periods. The fact is that, Pluto day period is created as a function in the Earth Moon Day Period.
- On the other side, the moon orbital apogee radius which should be = 413600 km became =406000 km because of Pluto motion effect on the moon orbital motion.
- Paper Objective
- Because no physics theory can give an explanation for such dependency found between 2 small masses planets which are at a huge distance between them, I have to prove this dependency between the 2 planets by all means. And as a result for these proves, we have to search after the method by which this dependency can be created.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Kepler 3rd law explanation (a claim against nobel prize board decision in ph...Gerges francis
A claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision – in Physics -2018
Best Greetings
I send this paper as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board - for their decision - for Nobel Prize in physics 2018
Of course I have nothing against the great people who receive the Nobel Prize in Physics 2018 and I congratulate them for their great works
But at my side, I found there's a serious question here
Because I explained frequently in my research that, there's a serious contradiction in physics current theories and we can't understand the solar group geometry if no one solves this contradiction…
I Provided many hard arguments to prove this claim and thought that, the Nobel Prize Board will support me to solve this contradiction in physics.
But I found the Board decision avoids my work!
For that reason I summarized the main idea in this paper and send it as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board
And I wish the board will accept to give me a chance to explain and defend my point of view..
With the Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers
http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
The Space is Energy
This supports the claim
"There's A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance"
This paper discusses and tries to prove this fact
Research presentation (revised) (iv) (corrected) Gerges francis
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation (More Discussion)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse draws the cart –Similar to that – light motion leads planet motion- based on that light motion is the energy source by which planet does its motion)
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This document presents a research hypothesis that planet motion depends on light motion. It provides four proofs of this hypothesis:
1) Matter and space dimensions are created proportionally based on an equation. This explains why the sun and moon appear the same size.
2) Planet orbital distances appear proportional to diameters, supporting the first proof. Mars' position may have changed, supporting this.
3) Lorentz transformations show that particle properties change with motion, providing consistency with the first two proofs.
4) A "Mars Migration Theory" explains anomalies in theories of Earth's moon by proposing Mars collided with Earth and Venus as it migrated outwards. This supports the claim that orbital distances relate to diameters.
The Space is Energy
This fact can be proved directly by Earth Jupiter Distance Analysis (627 million km)
That means the matter and distance are created from Energy regardless their different forms (The sun rays is different from the oil but both are energy)
This fact supports the main idea in my research that:
The solar group is a trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this trajectory.
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion) Gerges francis
The document discusses the geometry of the solar system. It provides data on planetary properties and proposes that:
1) The solar system is a single trajectory of energy, with each planet representing a point on that trajectory.
2) All planetary data, such as diameters, masses, and orbital distances, are created relative to each other based on a single underlying equation.
3) Jupiter plays a central role, with its diameter determining the total diameter of all planets and its energy owning the main energy of the solar system. Equations are presented showing relationships between Jupiter and Saturn.
Energy Transportation Through The Solar Group Gerges francis
Abstract
This paper analyzes and tries to prove the previous paper concepts
Light Velocity Effect On Solar System Geometry
In that paper I have claimed:
1. The Solar Group is one Geometrical building and Each Planet is a part of It
2. i.e. solar planets are connected with each other as a train carriages– means– the planets motions is one general motion done by the whole machine (the train)
How that can be possible?
3. Planet matter is created of Energy (E=mc2 supports that)
4. Planet Orbital Distance is created of Energy (Space = Energy "My Hypothesis)
That means
5. Solar Group is one Energy transports from one planet to another creating the planet matter and orbital distance – and causes planet motion configurations
Main Conclusion
The previous description provides a basic conclusion which is:
"Energy Must Be Transported Through The Solar Group Which Creates Planets Matters And Orbital Distances"
This is the main idea shortly…
In this paper we try to analyze this idea (concept) as deeply as possible
In this analysis process we have many points to deal with
First of all we need to
(1) Prove The Energy Transportation Process ….and
(2) Discover Energy Transportation Process Features and Concepts
But, because Energy Transportation Process is So complex one – I need to summarize its features in questions to follow the argument in clear gradually progress
Paper Main Questions
1- What Does Mean "Energy Is Transported From Point To Another Through The Solar Group"? (will be discussed in Point No. 3)
2- How Can We Be Sure That The Energy Is Transported From Any Point To Another? (Point No. 4)
3- What Are The Energy Transportation Basic Concepts & Features? (Point No. 5)
4- Can Planets Axial Tilts And Orbital Inclinations Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 6)
5- Can Planets Diameters Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 7)
6- Can Planets Masses Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 8)
7- Can Planets Velocities Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 9)
8- Can Planets Orbital Distances Values Prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 10)
9- Does Pluto Earth Relationship prove Energy Transportation Process? (Point No. 11)
Abstract
- The Solar Planets motions are relativistic motions
- Earth real Velocity = 0.99 c
- The time is an Energy
- Based on Relativistic Motions, the distances values can be seen as time values
i.e.
- The time is equivalent for the distance
(a development for the Special Theory of Relativity made by me)
- The Solar group geometrical structure depends on the time and Distance equivalence (based on relativistic motions), to create different rates of time, which enables the system to accumulate the Energy
Let's summarize this idea in following:
- Based on the solar group relativistic motions, time and distances values are equivalence
- The solar geometry uses unified distances to create different values of time, which are seen by different cycles
- The time different values depend on each other to create different rates of time
- By this different rates of time the Energy can be accumulated to produce huge energy from average one.
- Based on this description, the solar planets motions produce the sun light beams
Abstract
Hypothesis: Space is Energy and has different densities of Energy
i.e. Not all spaces have the same energy density
The Main Idea ….
Let's summarize the main idea in following:
1- The space is Energy
2- The Space has different densities of Energy
3- The space of higher energy goes to upper level where the lower Energy Space is found in lower level
4- As we see in air or water… the higher temperature air goes to up but the lower temperature air goes down.. this process uses the medium (air or water) to transfer the energy but without medium the space itself behaves by this same mechanism where the space is Energy has different densities and tries to reach the balance point of his different energy levels.
5- Also we know that, the higher places have potential energy higher than the lower places which supports the same meaning that the space different densities of energy can be distinguished by different levels of space..
6- Now let's suppose that, the planet uses the space potential energy by transferring it into kinetic energy for this planet motion…
7- So the planet is born from his space energy (his orbital distance energy) and moves by transferring this space potential energy into kinetic energy (and this explains the relationship which we have found between the planet diameter and orbital distance)
8- Based on that, Mercury is found on the most higher point (level) than any other planet and he's directly under the sun, and because of his very high position, his space potential energy is very high one where Mercury uses this high potential energy by transferring it into kinetic Energy by which Mercury moves (Mercury velocity is the highest one)
9- That means, each solar planet is found on different level relating to the other planets and based on his motion velocity.
10- i.e. Each solar planet occupies one step in stairs contains of 9 steps…. That means the solar group is in stair form and the sun is on Apex
11- Based on that, the solar planets motions trajectory must be in a pyramid form.
12- The previous idea makes the solar group motions is near to atom's particles motions which can lead to unify the physics theories.
Research Summary
I- Research Main Questions
1- How Planet Diameter Is Created? (= How The Matter Is Created?)
2- How Planet orbital distance is defined (= What's The Space?)
3- Is There A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
(i.e. Does Space effect on Matter Creation Process?)
II- Research Methodology
I use the planets data analysis to discover the concepts on which they are created?
(I use NASA Planetary Fact Sheet as the only source for Planets Data)
III- Research Hypothesis
(A) Research Primary Hypothesis (have no proves)
- The Matter is created of Energy (E=mc2 supports this idea)
- The Space is Energy (my Hypothesis)
(B) Research Main Hypothesis (have proves)
1- The Solar Group is One Building And Each Planet is A Part Of It
2- There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group
3- Mars Orbital Distance is Changed Through Solar Group History
Plato in the Allegory of the cave tells us some interesting theory
We can't see the facts because we are prisoners in the cave
We can see only the facts shadows
So we have to analyze the seen shadows to reach to the facts
Plato's Cave is in a consistency with my theory which is
"Planet Motion depends On Light Motion"
Let's summarize this theory in following:
- The light motion is found before the creation of the universe matter
- Lorentz Transformations tells that – The matter is created as a function of its motion (this argument will be reviewed in this paper introduction)
- I suggest that – The Matter Is Created Out Of The Light - Some Change in Light Nature causes to create The Matter
How?
- Suppose we have a light its nature is changed (by This Specific Change) – So this changed light will get a new property which causes the matter creation – let's call this changed light as "The Matter Zygote"
- The Matter Zygote has a new property – where – it creates the matter based on the motion – this property isn't one of the light nature properties – because the light travels but creates no matter – "The Matter Zygote" is different because of the light nature change – and the matter zygote creates the matter by motion
- The Light Motion is the Distance Creator and Designer where the matter zygote is a follower to the light motion.
- The Light And matter pass the same distance but with different rates of time
- The matter is created as a function of its motion –means – the matter properties are created to be in harmony with this matter motion – because of that- the Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, orbital inclination and axial tilt…etc are in harmony with this same planet motion – that because the planet motion was found before the planet matter creation.
- The Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
- The Motion Concept " Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day Depends On Light Motion For 1 Second"
- The Matter Creation Concept "The Planet Matter Is Created As A Function Of Its Motion During 1 Solar Day"
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Does The Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features (II)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar System Geometry depends On Light Motion Features
The Hypothesis proves
- The Solar System Data can be explained only by using the light motion geometrical features … let's see some data & Rules in following:
The Equal Distances 50% at least of all distances in the solar system distances are equal each other – we have these distances in the previous paper (Does the Solar System Geometry depend on Light Motion Features?) – We can't explain why these distances are equal each other unless we suggest that these distances are created by a light beam and its reflected one
The Rated Distances by the rate 1.0725 – these distances also we have seen in the previous paper – around 40 % of all the solar planets distances are rated to each by the same one rate (1.0725) and we can't explain why? unless we suggest that – these distances also were equal as the previous point distances but the reflected light beams of these distances are reflected in another frame which created Lorentz length Contraction Phenomenon for all these distances – otherwise why by the same one rate 40% of all distances are rated
The proportionality between the matter and space in the solar system – this also should be a proof that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features - the previous prove we have discussed in the previous paper with many others – is there any new proof?
A NEW PROOF
The Universe Creator is the Motion and NOT the Matter – i.e. – the motion is found before the matter creation- this concept proves that the solar system geometry depends on light motion features. – the paper discuss and tries to prove this concept…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Abstract
According to Carl Anderson Experiment 1932, by which he produced electron & positron from Gamma rays
I claim the solar system is created by the light through this same way, where, I claim
1- The Earth is The Big Electron
(i.e. the Earth Atom has a positive nucleus charge and cloud of electrons move around this nucleus "which is Real for the Earth")
2- 4 Planets (Mercury, Venus, Moon & Mars) together are The Big Positron
(i.e. The four planets Atoms have a negatives nucleuses charges and clouds of positrons move around these nucleuses (which is supposed)
3- The Attraction between the 5 inner planets depends on The Charge Attraction, Avoiding The Gravity Concept.
4 - The Outer Planets are depended on The Inner Planets
5- The sun is the solar system motions result
This paper tries to prove the Previous Theory.
(The solar system geometry is a series of papers, this first paper is dedicated for the previous theory proves only)
- The document presents a theory that the solar system was created by light in the same way that electrons and positrons are produced from gamma rays according to Carl Anderson's 1932 experiment.
- Specifically, the theory claims that the Earth acts as a "big electron" while the planets Mercury, Venus, Moon, and Mars together act as a "big positron." Their interaction is proposed to explain the motions and attractions of the inner planets.
- To prove this theory, the document will analyze data about the inner and outer planets to show they can be distinguished in categories consistent with the theory - namely, distinguishing the Earth from the other four inner planets, and showing the outer planets are dependent on the inner planets.
Abstract
The Total Solar Eclipse tells us…
the sun/moon diameters = Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance
No geometrical reason behind !
The solar planets creation theory tells us, a big star was following the sun, and exploded, from his material the solar planets were formed by the gravity …
i.e. The Solar Planets were created Randomly, and so any relationship as the previous one must be found by "Pure Coincidence"!
I suggest, alternative theory concerns the solar group creation…let's write it:
- The solar planets were created Relating Geometrically to each other and Not Randomly.
- The Matter in general is produced in pairs relating geometrically (or in some other features) and there's no any matter is found individually.
- The solar group is one building, each planet is a component in this same building, that's why each planet has a geometrical relationship with one or more of other planets …
- The sun is created related to the solar planets geometrically.
To support my theory let's use Einstein Equation E=mc2
We consider Each Particle Mass & Energy is independent from any other Particle Mass & Energy…
But let's suppose that, there's One General Energy (E), for the whole universe.
So the universe will be as a puppets theatre, the puppets are the masses but all of them are connected together in the General Energy
i.e.
Each Planet (Particle) Energy Is Created Connected To This General Energy, And So They Are Connected & Related Geometrically To Each Other…. that's what my theory suggests
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
The document discusses Kepler's law that a planet's orbit defines its velocity. It provides 5 points to explain this: 1) Planet data is based on exact equations, not random factors. 2) A planet's diameter should be indirectly related to its orbital distance to avoid breaking during motion. 3) A planet's mass affects its orbital inclination and limits variables in diameter equations. 4) A function is needed between a planet's orbit and velocity to connect variables like rotation period. 5) Newton's gravity theory and the Big Bang theory are incorrect because planet data requires exact geometrical rules, not chaos. The document aims to show planetary motions result from one precise geometrical design, not random forces.
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The binding of cosmological structures by massless topological defectsSérgio Sacani
Assuming spherical symmetry and weak field, it is shown that if one solves the Poisson equation or the Einstein field
equations sourced by a topological defect, i.e. a singularity of a very specific form, the result is a localized gravitational
field capable of driving flat rotation (i.e. Keplerian circular orbits at a constant speed for all radii) of test masses on a thin
spherical shell without any underlying mass. Moreover, a large-scale structure which exploits this solution by assembling
concentrically a number of such topological defects can establish a flat stellar or galactic rotation curve, and can also deflect
light in the same manner as an equipotential (isothermal) sphere. Thus, the need for dark matter or modified gravity theory is
mitigated, at least in part.
(June 12, 2024) Webinar: Development of PET theranostics targeting the molecu...Scintica Instrumentation
Targeting Hsp90 and its pathogen Orthologs with Tethered Inhibitors as a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategy for cancer and infectious diseases with Dr. Timothy Haystead.
Sexuality - Issues, Attitude and Behaviour - Applied Social Psychology - Psyc...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Describing and Interpreting an Immersive Learning Case with the Immersion Cub...Leonel Morgado
Current descriptions of immersive learning cases are often difficult or impossible to compare. This is due to a myriad of different options on what details to include, which aspects are relevant, and on the descriptive approaches employed. Also, these aspects often combine very specific details with more general guidelines or indicate intents and rationales without clarifying their implementation. In this paper we provide a method to describe immersive learning cases that is structured to enable comparisons, yet flexible enough to allow researchers and practitioners to decide which aspects to include. This method leverages a taxonomy that classifies educational aspects at three levels (uses, practices, and strategies) and then utilizes two frameworks, the Immersive Learning Brain and the Immersion Cube, to enable a structured description and interpretation of immersive learning cases. The method is then demonstrated on a published immersive learning case on training for wind turbine maintenance using virtual reality. Applying the method results in a structured artifact, the Immersive Learning Case Sheet, that tags the case with its proximal uses, practices, and strategies, and refines the free text case description to ensure that matching details are included. This contribution is thus a case description method in support of future comparative research of immersive learning cases. We then discuss how the resulting description and interpretation can be leveraged to change immersion learning cases, by enriching them (considering low-effort changes or additions) or innovating (exploring more challenging avenues of transformation). The method holds significant promise to support better-grounded research in immersive learning.
CLASS 12th CHEMISTRY SOLID STATE ppt (Animated)eitps1506
Description:
Dive into the fascinating realm of solid-state physics with our meticulously crafted online PowerPoint presentation. This immersive educational resource offers a comprehensive exploration of the fundamental concepts, theories, and applications within the realm of solid-state physics.
From crystalline structures to semiconductor devices, this presentation delves into the intricate principles governing the behavior of solids, providing clear explanations and illustrative examples to enhance understanding. Whether you're a student delving into the subject for the first time or a seasoned researcher seeking to deepen your knowledge, our presentation offers valuable insights and in-depth analyses to cater to various levels of expertise.
Key topics covered include:
Crystal Structures: Unravel the mysteries of crystalline arrangements and their significance in determining material properties.
Band Theory: Explore the electronic band structure of solids and understand how it influences their conductive properties.
Semiconductor Physics: Delve into the behavior of semiconductors, including doping, carrier transport, and device applications.
Magnetic Properties: Investigate the magnetic behavior of solids, including ferromagnetism, antiferromagnetism, and ferrimagnetism.
Optical Properties: Examine the interaction of light with solids, including absorption, reflection, and transmission phenomena.
With visually engaging slides, informative content, and interactive elements, our online PowerPoint presentation serves as a valuable resource for students, educators, and enthusiasts alike, facilitating a deeper understanding of the captivating world of solid-state physics. Explore the intricacies of solid-state materials and unlock the secrets behind their remarkable properties with our comprehensive presentation.
JAMES WEBB STUDY THE MASSIVE BLACK HOLE SEEDSSérgio Sacani
The pathway(s) to seeding the massive black holes (MBHs) that exist at the heart of galaxies in the present and distant Universe remains an unsolved problem. Here we categorise, describe and quantitatively discuss the formation pathways of both light and heavy seeds. We emphasise that the most recent computational models suggest that rather than a bimodal-like mass spectrum between light and heavy seeds with light at one end and heavy at the other that instead a continuum exists. Light seeds being more ubiquitous and the heavier seeds becoming less and less abundant due the rarer environmental conditions required for their formation. We therefore examine the different mechanisms that give rise to different seed mass spectrums. We show how and why the mechanisms that produce the heaviest seeds are also among the rarest events in the Universe and are hence extremely unlikely to be the seeds for the vast majority of the MBH population. We quantify, within the limits of the current large uncertainties in the seeding processes, the expected number densities of the seed mass spectrum. We argue that light seeds must be at least 103 to 105 times more numerous than heavy seeds to explain the MBH population as a whole. Based on our current understanding of the seed population this makes heavy seeds (Mseed > 103 M⊙) a significantly more likely pathway given that heavy seeds have an abundance pattern than is close to and likely in excess of 10−4 compared to light seeds. Finally, we examine the current state-of-the-art in numerical calculations and recent observations and plot a path forward for near-future advances in both domains.
EWOCS-I: The catalog of X-ray sources in Westerlund 1 from the Extended Weste...Sérgio Sacani
Context. With a mass exceeding several 104 M⊙ and a rich and dense population of massive stars, supermassive young star clusters
represent the most massive star-forming environment that is dominated by the feedback from massive stars and gravitational interactions
among stars.
Aims. In this paper we present the Extended Westerlund 1 and 2 Open Clusters Survey (EWOCS) project, which aims to investigate
the influence of the starburst environment on the formation of stars and planets, and on the evolution of both low and high mass stars.
The primary targets of this project are Westerlund 1 and 2, the closest supermassive star clusters to the Sun.
Methods. The project is based primarily on recent observations conducted with the Chandra and JWST observatories. Specifically,
the Chandra survey of Westerlund 1 consists of 36 new ACIS-I observations, nearly co-pointed, for a total exposure time of 1 Msec.
Additionally, we included 8 archival Chandra/ACIS-S observations. This paper presents the resulting catalog of X-ray sources within
and around Westerlund 1. Sources were detected by combining various existing methods, and photon extraction and source validation
were carried out using the ACIS-Extract software.
Results. The EWOCS X-ray catalog comprises 5963 validated sources out of the 9420 initially provided to ACIS-Extract, reaching a
photon flux threshold of approximately 2 × 10−8 photons cm−2
s
−1
. The X-ray sources exhibit a highly concentrated spatial distribution,
with 1075 sources located within the central 1 arcmin. We have successfully detected X-ray emissions from 126 out of the 166 known
massive stars of the cluster, and we have collected over 71 000 photons from the magnetar CXO J164710.20-455217.
Discovery of An Apparent Red, High-Velocity Type Ia Supernova at 𝐳 = 2.9 wi...Sérgio Sacani
We present the JWST discovery of SN 2023adsy, a transient object located in a host galaxy JADES-GS
+
53.13485
−
27.82088
with a host spectroscopic redshift of
2.903
±
0.007
. The transient was identified in deep James Webb Space Telescope (JWST)/NIRCam imaging from the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES) program. Photometric and spectroscopic followup with NIRCam and NIRSpec, respectively, confirm the redshift and yield UV-NIR light-curve, NIR color, and spectroscopic information all consistent with a Type Ia classification. Despite its classification as a likely SN Ia, SN 2023adsy is both fairly red (
�
(
�
−
�
)
∼
0.9
) despite a host galaxy with low-extinction and has a high Ca II velocity (
19
,
000
±
2
,
000
km/s) compared to the general population of SNe Ia. While these characteristics are consistent with some Ca-rich SNe Ia, particularly SN 2016hnk, SN 2023adsy is intrinsically brighter than the low-
�
Ca-rich population. Although such an object is too red for any low-
�
cosmological sample, we apply a fiducial standardization approach to SN 2023adsy and find that the SN 2023adsy luminosity distance measurement is in excellent agreement (
≲
1
�
) with
Λ
CDM. Therefore unlike low-
�
Ca-rich SNe Ia, SN 2023adsy is standardizable and gives no indication that SN Ia standardized luminosities change significantly with redshift. A larger sample of distant SNe Ia is required to determine if SN Ia population characteristics at high-
�
truly diverge from their low-
�
counterparts, and to confirm that standardized luminosities nevertheless remain constant with redshift.
Authoring a personal GPT for your research and practice: How we created the Q...Leonel Morgado
Thematic analysis in qualitative research is a time-consuming and systematic task, typically done using teams. Team members must ground their activities on common understandings of the major concepts underlying the thematic analysis, and define criteria for its development. However, conceptual misunderstandings, equivocations, and lack of adherence to criteria are challenges to the quality and speed of this process. Given the distributed and uncertain nature of this process, we wondered if the tasks in thematic analysis could be supported by readily available artificial intelligence chatbots. Our early efforts point to potential benefits: not just saving time in the coding process but better adherence to criteria and grounding, by increasing triangulation between humans and artificial intelligence. This tutorial will provide a description and demonstration of the process we followed, as two academic researchers, to develop a custom ChatGPT to assist with qualitative coding in the thematic data analysis process of immersive learning accounts in a survey of the academic literature: QUAL-E Immersive Learning Thematic Analysis Helper. In the hands-on time, participants will try out QUAL-E and develop their ideas for their own qualitative coding ChatGPT. Participants that have the paid ChatGPT Plus subscription can create a draft of their assistants. The organizers will provide course materials and slide deck that participants will be able to utilize to continue development of their custom GPT. The paid subscription to ChatGPT Plus is not required to participate in this workshop, just for trying out personal GPTs during it.
8.Isolation of pure cultures and preservation of cultures.pdf
Vacuum energy theory
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
Vacuum Energy Theory
Solar Group Geometry (Part 21)
By Gerges Francis Twadrous
2nd
course student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013
TEL +201022532292 georgytawdrous@yandex.ru / mrwaheid@gmail.com
Abstract
The figure shows The Solar Group (E1 is Mercury
level but E9 Is Pluto level)
Vacuum Energy Theory Basics
- Vacuum stores Energy (Space is Energy)
- Vacuum stores Energy with different capacities
(Space has different densities of Energy).
- Vacuum with higher storing Capacity (Space
with higher density of Energy) goes to upper
location vertically relating to other Space
Layers (as shown in the figure).
- The solar group has 9 Space layers (Mercury Level is the highest Layer vertically)
- Each Space Layer has different density of Energy (different Capacity)
- Each Space layer stores Energy….from this Energy the planet matter is created and
the layer rest Energy is used as potential energy which will transferred into Kinetic
Energy to be used for this planet motion.
- The relativistic effects (specifically Lorentz length contraction) leads to increase
the Vacuum storing capacity of Energy (i.e. increase the Space density of Energy)
- The Previous description explains why the solar group motions trajectory is in a
pyramid form.
- The solar group original Energy is provided by the Earth
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Twitter https://twitter.com/tawadrous_f
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
S. Virgin Mary Assumption into Heaven.
Written in Cairo – Egypt
11th
January 2019
E2
E3
E5
E6
E7
E8
E9
E1
E4
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
Planetary Fact Sheet - Metric
MERCUR
Y
VENUS EARTH MOON MARS JUPITE
R
SATUR
N
URANU
S
NEPTUN
E
PLUTO
Mass (1024
kg) 0.330 4.87 5.97 0.073 0.642 1898 568 86.8 102 0.0131
Diameter (km) 4879 12,104 12,756 3475 6792 142,984 120,536 51,118 49,528 2390
Density (kg/m3
) 5427 5243 5514 3340 3933 1326 687 1271 1638 1830
Gravity (m/s2
) 3.7 8.9 9.8 1.6 3.7 23.1 9.0 8.7 11.0 0.6
Escape
Velocity (km/s)
4.3 10.4 11.2 2.4 5.0 59.5 35.5 21.3 23.5 1.1
Rotation
Period (hours)
1407.6 -5832.5 23.9 655.7 24.6 9.9 10.7 -17.2 16.1 -153.3
Length of Day (hours) 4222.6 2802.0 24.0 708.7 24.7 9.9 10.7 17.2 16.1 153.3
Distance from
Sun (106
km)
57.9 108.2 149.6 0.384* 227.9 778.6 1433.5 2872.5 4495.1 5870.0
Perihelion (106
km) 46.0 107.5 147.1 0.363* 206.6 740.5 1352.6 2741.3 4444.5 4435.0
Aphelion (106
km) 69.8 108.9 152.1 0.406* 249.2 816.6 1514.5 3003.6 4545.7 7304.3
Orbital
Period (days)
88.0 224.7 365.2 27.3 687.0 4331 10,747 30,589 59,800 90,588
Orbital
Velocity (km/s)
47.4 35.0 29.8 1.0 24.1 13.1 9.7 6.8 5.4 4.7
Orbital
Inclination (degree
s)
7.0 3.4 0.0 5.1 1.9 1.3 2.5 0.8 1.8 17.2
Orbital
Eccentricity
0.205 0.007 0.017 0.055 0.094 0.049 0.057 0.046 0.011 0.244
Axial Tilt (degrees) 0.01 177.4 23.4 6.7 25.2 3.1 26.7 97.8 28.3 122.5
Mean
Temperature (C)
167 464 15 -20 -65 -110 -140 -195 -200 -225
Surface
Pressure (bars)
0 92 1 0 0.01 Unknown*
Unknown
*
Unknown
*
Unknown* 0
Number of Moons 0 0 1 0 2 67 62 27 14 5
Ring System? No No No No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Global Magnetic
Field?
Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Unknow
n
MERCUR
Y
VENUS EARTH MOON MARS JUPITE
R
SATUR
N
URANU
S
NEPTUN
E
PLUTO
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
Contents
Subject Page
Abstract 1
Planetary Fact Sheet – Metric 2
Contents 3
1- Introduction 4
2- Methodology 9
Proves of the Theory 10
3-Planets Velocities are found based on geometrical rules and not
by gravity force
11
4-The moon orbit shows that, solar planet diameters are created
from the space Energy
13
5-The solar group motion trajectory is in a pyramid form,
supporting the theory
16
6-Earth Motion Energy is The Solar Group Original Energy 17
Appendix No.1 20
Appendix No. 2 (The Planets alignment in December 2012) 21
Author Curriculum Vitae 29
Author Other Papers 35
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
1- Introduction
Vacuum Energy Theory tries to explain the solar group geometrical structure and
motion… to do this hard task, the theory suggests many new concepts…
To provide sufficient proves for this theory we need to discuss its main concepts
Let's summarize the theory main concepts and discuss them
Theory Main Concepts
1st
Concept Space is Energy and has different densities of energy
2nd
Concept Space of higher Energy goes upper vertically (in location)
3rd
Concept The Matter is created from the space (Space= Energy)
4th
Concept Lorentz length contraction effect causes to concentrate the energy
(i.e. causes to increase the space energy density)
5th
Concept the solar planets are found on 9 different steps vertically
(which makes the solar group motions in a pyramid form)
6th
Concept The Planet Velocity shows his space layer energy density
The Discussion
1st
Concept Space is Energy and has different densities of energy
What's the space? It's the darkness around us ……What's the darkness? …….???
In Young Experiment (double slit experiment), the light coherence produces bright
fringes and dark fringes…I don't discuss the light nature theory…I discuss the
experiment results…
From light coherence… (the input is light beams only)
The results are bright fringes ….. and dark fringes…..imagine we are very small
creatures and we live inside the dark fringes… how we'll see it? as space or
darkness….. it's right
1-The Space is An Energy…. My proof is Young Experiment
Are there different densities of Energy in the Space?
The idea here is related and not direct….I suppose that the matter is created from Space
because the Space is Energy…. but the matter creation depends on quantum standardization,
that means 1.2 Mev (Gamma Rays) may produce Electron and positron but 1.1 Mev
(Gamma rays) can't…
So the idea is
I suppose Lorentz length contraction causes to concentrate the energy, this energy
concentration increase the energy density in space…this concentration of Energy will be
continuous till this energy reaches to the required quantum value to create the matter and
after the matter creation the energy density will be decreased…. It's something like woman
pregnancy to give birth to a child….. so the space density of Energy during this period will
be increasing and after the matter birth this density will be decreased… I mean the proof is a
part of the whole process, we should later discuss in details.
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
2nd
Concept Space of higher Energy goes upper vertically (in location)
This idea we have concluded from classical phenomena… for example the hot air or
water moves to higher level, where the cold air moves down…. Also we know that
the higher places have potential energy more than the lower places…..
I suppose these phenomena just outer features for the basic machine behind… that the
space itself moves upper in location (vertically) with higher density of Energy… so
the higher Energy is upper always….
This description needs more analysis because the matter is created from the space
energy (as I have supposed) now before the matter creation the space density of
Energy was so higher but after the matter creation the density will be so lower which
causes great changes in the solar group vertical levels…
But is there any real proof that, the upper space has stored energy more than the
lower one?! Why there's no potential energy for the lowest ground level? Because
there's no more lowest… so the vertical arrangement itself is a proof that there's
energy with upper vertical motion…
The whole machine proves are sufficient prove for its components…
3rd
Concept The Matter is created from the space (Space= Energy)
Pair production (electron and positron production from Gamma rays 1.2Mev)
Tells us that, the particles (matters) can be created from the energy (Gamma rays)
Let's remember 1st
question….. is Space An Energy? does Space store Energy?
Yes… why because of Young Experiment (as explained before)…. So space has
energy…. and matter is created of energy…so space can create the matter
2-The Space can create the matter
I.e.
The Solar Planet Diameter (Matter) Is Created From This
Solar Planet Orbital Distance Energy (Space Energy)
This explains the relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
Please review
Kepler 3rd Law Explanation
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
4th Concept Lorentz length contraction effect causes to concentrate the energy
(i.e. causes to increase the space energy density)
This idea we have discussed before…. Let's remember it here again…
We have steel rod its length L1 moves with a velocity v=0.99c (where c is light
velocity)… what will happen? This steel rod will be contracted with rate 7.1
i.e. if L1 = 7.1 m in no motion relative to us, so L1 will = 1 m when it moves with
v=0.99c relative to us…. what did happen? Lorentz length contraction effect….. but
is there any change occurred for the steel rod itself….? No…. so what's happened?
Just changes for our vision!
But when we accelerate electron to move by c velocity and the electron mass
increases instead to accelerate its velocity…is this change for the electron mass a real
change or just happened for our vision otherwise where is the energy which we spent
in the acceleration process?
This discussion was complex one and still till now…. The main difficulty is that we
consider that, the object has entity independent from our vision!
The direct question is that….. has the object entity independent from our vision or
not?!
Even I'm afraid to answer!! No has not
Why?
Because the universe matter is created as a result for the human mind effect on the
universe…. The matter is created as mirror to the knowledge in the human mind….
That's occurred because the human mind works by electromagnetic waves move with
c velocity which force us to see all light beams around us as matters ..
This answer isn't sufficient yet … basically because I don't know why the light (or
object) moves with physical law…. Why the motion isn't done simply in Chaos?....
that's happening basically because of the human logic and knowledge …
I'm unable to continue this discussion….It's harder than my current ability!
Let's return to lorentz contraction….
The matter has no independent existence….it's energy we see in matter form
When the steel rod L1 moves by v=0.99c ….something is happened for our vision so
we see it shorter…. The steel energy is the same…. So the same energy is stored in
shorter length….that's called concentration of Energy …. Which increases the energy
density in space
For more extensive discussion please read my previous paper
Why Energy has Different Forms?
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0116
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
5th
Concept The solar planets are found on 9 different steps vertically
(which makes the solar group motions in a pyramid form)
This idea we have discussed before and will discuss more deeply in this paper
For our previous discussion please review
Solar Planets Motions Trajectory is a Pyramid (Part i)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0076
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0135
6th Concept The Planet Velocity shows his space layer energy density
To discuss this concept as deeply as possible let's ask the following question
The Question is
If the higher Space level (Mercury level) contains the most great Energy amount why didn't
produce the most great mass (Jupiter for example) in place of Mercury….? Means if the
energy is available why isn't used for greater mass in place of higher velocity (where
Mercury is the highest velocity planet)?
We had similar question…. Let's remember it here…
When we try to accelerate an electron to move by c velocity…. We have found that, the
electron mass becomes greater but the electron velocity isn't accelerated why? The energy is
available but isn't used for velocity instead used for mass?!
I conclude, there's another factor effect on the Energy distribution between mass and
velocity of the born planet
Let's discuss Heisenberg principle in following
Heisenberg principle discussion
Heisenberg principle states that, there's a fundamental limit of measuring accuracy both
position and momentum of a particle in the same time.
Why?
If the particle moves by high velocity near light velocity, that may cause relativistic effects
which may increase this particle mass and changes his momentum…. So to measure the
velocity (change reason) and the momentum (change result) in the same time it may be
illogical but why the particle position (and not the particle velocity)?
Let's write that in mathematic form
(dX/dE)….the particle (solar planet) position changes (vertically) based on his space energy
change…
Why the particle position doesn't change relating to the time?
That because the matter is produced from the space energy based on quantum
standardization… that means the energy 1.2Mev (Gamma rays) may produce electron and
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
positron but the Energy 1.1 Mev (gamma rays) can't do that. i.e. the matter creation depends
on quantum standardization…
So the particle position will change according to his level of Energy change till this energy
reach to the required quantum to produce the matter and then the matter will be produced
with her time rate…
So what's the particle which moves vertically till matter is born? It's supposed particle
(which may be a wave) the matter will be born after reaching the required quntum value of
energy but the matter behaviour is defined by the enegy before the matter creation…. Means
any wave of the mother energy can behave in place of the supposed particle (as a wave) till
the particle is born after the energy quantum is produced.
Bohr Model
The solar group by the previous description will be near to Bohr model of Atom
There are 2 important points here to refer
1- Our model for solar group uses the location vertical axis as measurement of different
Energy levels of Space
2- Because the planet motion is in ellipse form and moves from perihelion to aphelion
and vice versa so no emitting Energy is required.
I wish the machine is clear as possible
- The relativistic effects (Lorenz length contraction effect) causes to concentrate the
energy which increase the space density of energy
- The space higher density of Energy moves upper on the vertical axis
- The available energy with another unknown reason together causes to produce the matter
from Space Energy (Vacuum Energy)
- The Sapce higher energy is seen in higher velocity and not in greater mass for the solar
planet (but is seen in greater mass and no higher velocity for electron)
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
2- Methodology
I use the same method in all my researches, The Planet Data Analysis…
Let's explain the idea here again
In Pythagoras triangle we found that a2
+ b2
= c2
, this rule we can conclude from the triangle
data if its dimensions are 3, 4 and 5… so the data may show the geometrical rules….similar
to that, I use the solar planets data analysis to conclude the main geometrical rules which
explain the solar planets origin and motion…
Let's use this method to explain the moon orbital motion in following:
Preface:
Also
Let's explain the previous Equation firstly
28.3 degrees (Neptune axial tilt) is the main value which is contracted by lorentz length
contraction effect (by the 1.0725) to produce 26.7 deg (Saturn axial tilt) which also is
contracted again to produce 25.2 deg. (Mars axial tilt) and then contracted again to produce
23.4 deg. (Earth axial tilt) so these 4 values are equal but the difference is found by
relativistic effects
The Moon Orbital Motion:
- The moon moves 2.58 mkm daily = Earth motion daily (otherwise they will be
separated from each other)
- If there's no relativistic effects in the solar system, the moon should be seen as a
bright stationary point in the sky because Earth and Moon move by the same
velocity.
But
- Because of the relativistic effects this value (2.58 mkm) will be contracted with the
rate 1.0725 to produce the value 2.41 mkm (as in 1st
Equation)
- So the moon daily motion =2.58 mkm but this value is seen =2.41mkm (because of
lorentz length contraction phenomenon)
- The difference between both = 0.17 mkm which causes The Moon Daily
Displacement (0.17 mkm = 2 x 88000 km)
- Why the difference 0.17 mkm = 2 x moon daily displacement 88000km? may that
occur because of the motions opposite directions.
This theory can answer easily why the moon orbital circumference at apogee radius
(2.58mkm) = Earth daily motion….. because this circumference express the daily motion…
Please review … "The Moon Orbital Motion"
https://www.academia.edu/s/77becf288e/the-moon-orbital-motion
or
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0200
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-moon-orbital-motion
0725.1
mkm2.41mkm)0.384(rnceCircumfereOrbitalMoon
mkm2.58mkm)0.406(rnceCircumfereOrbitalApogee
0725.1
tiltaxailSatrun26.7
tiltaxailNeptune28.3
tiltaxailMars25.2
tiltaxailSatrun26.7
tiltaxailEarth23.4
tiltaxailMars25.2
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
PROVES
OF
Vacuum Energy Theory
3-Planets Velocities are found based on geometrical rules and not by gravity force
4-The moon orbit shows that, solar planet diameters are created from the space Energy
5-The solar group motion trajectory is in a pyramid form, supporting the theory
6-Earth Motion Energy is The Solar Group Original Energy
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
3-Planets Velocities are found based on geometrical rules and not by gravity force
3-1 Data
3-2 Discussion
3-1 Data
Group No. 1
1- A 17.1
VelocityPluto
VelocityNeptune
VelocityMars
VelocityMoon
VelocityEarth
VelocityVenus
(Max error 1.8%)
2- 2
355.1
VelocityJupiter
VelocityCeres
VelocityCeres
VelocityMars
VelocityVenus
VelocityMercury
A (Max error less 1%)
3- B 239.1
VelocityMars
VelocityEarth
VelocityNeptune
VelocityUranus
(Max error 1.6 %)
4- 2
4263.1
VelocityUranus
VelocitySaturn
B (Max error1.8 %)
5- (B/A) = (B2
/A2
) = 1.0725 (Max error1.3%)
Group No. 2
2Πmkm2
/ day =
= 4.095 mkm (Mercury velocity daily) x 1.534 mkm (Ceres velocity daily) =
= 3.02 mkm (Venus velocity daily) x 2.082 mkm (Mars velocity daily) =
= 2.58 mkm (Earth velocity daily) x 2.41 mkm (Moon velocity daily)=
Note Please There's No Cross Sectional Points Here
Each 2 planets velocities multiplication produce = 2Πmkm2
/ day, That tells us there's
some geometrical reason behind….
Note please /I suppose the moon daily velocity =2.41 mkm …. This suggestion
depends on the description is explained in this paper Methodology please review it.
Group No. 3
- Pluto Velocity daily = 1/ the moon supposed velocity daily (2.2%)
- Neptune Velocity daily = 1/ Mars Velocity Daily (2.9%)
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
3-2 The Discussion
The previous data is provided here to support one idea only …let's write here
"The Solar Planet Velocity Can't Be Created Based On The Gravity Force"
But
"The Solar Planet Velocity Is Created Based On Geometrical Rules And By
Geometrical Reasons"
There's nothing here to fight for….
I provide clear data supports my idea…
The classical theory will consider all provided data are found just by pure
coincidences….
I can't find any logic in the current theory defense points….. so my claim is supported
by one clear point here…
Let's start another prove point in following…
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
4-The moon orbit shows that, solar planet diameters are created from the space
Energy
4-1 Data
4-2 The Discussion
4-1 Data
i. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee point =363000 km = Solar Outer Planets
Diameters Total (error 1%)
ii. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee point =406000 km= Solar Planets Diameters Total
iii. The Distance between Perigee and Apogee = 40000km = Inner Solar Planets
Diameters Total = Earth Circumference.
iv. Earth daily motion = The moon orbit circumference at apogee radius (r=406000 km)
v. Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance at total solar eclipse radius
(r=377000km)
vi. Note Please/ Solar Planets Diameters Total= 2 Jupiter diameters + 1 Saturn diameter
(i.e. Jupiter diameter = 8 solar planets diameters total)
vii. 2 Neptune Circumference = outer planets diameters total (without Neptune) (1.8%)
Table No.1
"The Solar Planets Diameters Total Relationship With The Moon Orbit"
If Earth diameter = 12756 km, is considered to be = 1
i.e. The Earth Circumference which = 40080 km, will be just =Π
So The Following Is Correct Error
Earth Circumference = Π -
Solar Inner Planets diameter total = Π -
Moon motion free space (from perigee to apogee) = Π
(the free space without the moon diameter)
1.3%
Moon Perigee orbit radius = 9 Π -
Solar outer planets diameters total = 9 Π -
Moon orbit apogee radius =10 Π 1.2
All solar planets diameters total =10 Π 1
2 Jupiter diameter + Saturn diameter =10 Π -
Saturn Circumference =9.5Π
= Moon orbit radius at total solar eclipse
-
Jupiter Circumference =11 Π 1.9
The Sun diameter =11 Π2
1.2
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
More Data
The solar planets matters (diameters) are created based on geometrical rules
This moon orbit triangle proves this fact.
Let's suppose C is Earth
- AB = 120536 km = (=Saturn diameter)
- CB = 449000km = (=Jupiter Circumference)
- AC =373000 km =(=Saturn Circumference)= 373000 km = (Earth Moon
Distance when the moon at solar eclipse radius)
Details of CB
- CD= 363000 km =(Earth Moon Distance when the moon at perigee point)
- CF= 406000 km =(Earth Moon Distance when the moon at apogee point)
- DF=FB=43000 km (distance between perigee and apogee)
- AD is Perpendicular on the base CB where AD = DB = 86000 km
- EF=GD =43000 km (DFEG is a square its dimension =43000km)
- EF is perpendicular on the base, so the angle (BEF)= 45 degrees.
All previous dimensions are found based on Pythagoras rule …also.
- A angle = 121.67 degrees
- C angle = 13.33 degrees
- B angle = 45 degrees
Also
I- Solar Planets Diameters Total = 2 Jupiter diameters + 1 Saturn diameter
II- Jupiter Diameter = 2 Jupiter Circumference – 2 Saturn Circumference
III-
VI- CD =363000 km = Perigee radius = outer planets diameters total
12
2
km120536diameterSaturn
km142984diameterJupiter
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
4-2 The Discussion
This point aims to prove that, there's a relationship between the solar planets
diameters and the moon orbit radiuses…
- The previous data tells easily that, the solar planets diameter are created related
to the moon orbital radiuses and based on Geometrical rules and can't be
created by any random process…
- In fact the previous triangle is hard to understand… ABC triangle is formed by
values equal Saturn diameter, Saturn Circumference and Jupiter Circumference
but the moon orbit main points are defined clearly by this triangle altitude and
his parallel line created to divide DB into 2 parts ….where Saturn
Circumference = the moon orbital radius at total solar eclipse…. !
- I have tried frequently to show that there are Geometrical Rules Behind The
Matter Creation…this is the main idea in my research ….because the current
theories suppose that the planets are created from an exploded star material by
gravity forces effect…. This concept is absolutely wrong because the planets
matters (diameters and circumferences) can't be created by any random
process… but by geometrical rules.. as we see clearly in the previous triangle..
Let's provide more data to support this same meaning
Table No.2 No Error More Than 1.5%
The Relationship The Rate
Earth Diameter / Venus Diameter = A
= Mars Diameter / Earth Radius =
Mars Diameter / Venus Radius =
A2
= Venus Diameter / Moon Circumference =
= Moon Radius * Π/ Mercury Diameter =
= Pluto Circumference / Mars Diameter =
=Uranus Circumference / Jupiter Diameter =
= lunar apogee radius /lunar perigee radius =
Pluto Circumference / Earth Radius =
A3
= Mercury Circumference / Earth Diameter =
= Earth Diameter / Moon Circumference =
= Uranus Radius / Mars Circumference =
= Jupiter Diameter / Saturn Diameter =
= Saturn diameter / Uranus Diameter =
Venus Radius / Mercury Diameter = A4
= Uranus Diameter / Earth Circumference =
Uranus Diameter / Venus Circumference = A5
Jupiter Radius / Uranus Diameter =
A6
= Mercury Diameter / Moon Diameter =
= Mars Diameter / Mercury Diameter =
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
5-The solar group motion trajectory is in a pyramid form, supporting the theory
5-1 The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
5-2 why we see the planet square trajectory as ellipse one?
5-1 The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
The solar group motions trajectory is a pyramid… this idea we have discussed in details before
Please review
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0135
The Solar Group Geometrical Structure is A Pyramid (Revised)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0060
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square (Proves)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0147
5-2 why we see the planet square trajectory as ellipse one?
Let's answer this question in following ….. the following data we have seen before in Methodology
I-
The New Data is the following one
II-
Neptune axial tilt =28.3 degrees (on horizontal level) but on vertical level will be 28.3 +90
=118.3 degrees (as in Equation No. II)
So the value 118.3 degrees is related to the value 127.27 by the same contraction rate
What is the value 127.27 ? (400/π)=127.27 … this value we have discussed in our
discussion that " Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse"
And I have claimed that the solar planet motion trajectory is a square but we see it as an ellipse
because of the Earth Moon orbit effect ….
So the moon orbit effect produces this value 127.27 which is contracted and seen as 118.3 degrees
by lorentz contraction rate…
Neptune axial tilt 28.3 degree is contracted by lorentz contraction effect by the same rate (1.0725)
and produced 26.7 degrees (Saturn axial tilt) which will be contracted to produce 25.2 deg (mars
axial tilt) which will be contracted to produce 23.4 deg (Earth axial tilt)
That means this value 127.27 (which makes the square trajectory to be seen by us as an ellipse)…
this same value effects on 4 planets axial tilts (according to the previous equations) which means
that this same value 127.27 effects on all solar planets (but we have no yet the rest equations
because of the unknown geometrical rules)… so this value in truth force us to see the solar planet
trajectory ion ellipse form where it in truth is a square….
The previous equations tries to show that the factor is effective deeply in the solar planets data
which makes the observation results absolutely true in vision but not true in geometrical truth
meaning.
0725.1
tiltaxailSatrun26.7
tiltaxailNeptune28.3
tiltaxailMars25.2
tiltaxailSatrun26.7
tiltaxailEarth23.4
tiltaxailMars25.2
0725.1
y)(verticalltiltaxailNeptune118.3
127.27
17. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
17
6-Earth Motion Energy is The Solar Group Original Energy
6-1 The main Idea
6-2 The Whole Story
6-1 The main Idea
The solar group is created of Energy as we have discussed
The original Energy in the solar group is found from Earth motion
Even if we found the solar group original energy starts from Jupiter as we have discussed before ion
my previous paper Solar Group Geometrical Structure http://vixra.org/abs/1805.0081
In this case Earth has sent this energy to Jupiter, and that Means Jupiter Energy in fact is Earth
Energy…
The description which we have discussed before about the Earth motion Energy shows that the solar
group energy is found by Earth motion
Let's provide the data in following
6-2 The Whole Story
We have studied this whole story before …. But there's one new information I need to add so I need
to review the whole story and then add the new information….
I- Let's summarize the story in following:
- Earth daily motion is Energy (2.58 million km), Earth does it daily
- On the first day, Earth sent her daily motion energy (2.58mkm) toward the
moon orbit on the horizontal axis …
- There are relativistic effects in the space between Earth the moon caused by
v1=0.99c which caused a rate = 7.1
- Earth daily energy(2.58 mkm) faced these relativistic effects, and Earth daily energy
is contracted by the rate 7.1 which produces the equation 2.58 mkm =7.1 x 0.363
mkm (perigee radius =0.363 mkm) where the Energy stopped here!
- So Perigee radius is created firstly from Earth daily energy, but Earth energy is
stopped at perigee point (r=0.363 mkm) and can't move further
That's Why….
- On the second day, Earth sent her daily motion (2.58 mkm) toward the sun on
the vertical axis…. to avoid the contraction effect
- Earth daily Energy (2.58 mkm) reaches to the sun, where the sun absorbs this
energy and reflects it towed Pluto….so the Energy 2.58 mkm is sent from the
sun to Pluto
- In the way Earth Daily Energy (2.58mkm) received a great effect from Uranus
and sent it again toward Pluto
- Earth Daily Energy (2.58 mkm) reaches to Pluto who will send this same
energy toward the moon orbit (Energy transportation process depends on
r=0.406 mkm)
18. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
18
- Earth Energy (2.58mkm) is sent from Pluto to Apogee circumference =2.58
mkm which makes apogee radius = 406000km
- Earth Energy which consist the moon apogee circumference wants to move
deeper toward the Earth body, but this energy again faces the relativistic effects
from the other side so the contraction is done by the rate 1.0725
- Earth Energy tried 2 times to move deeper toward the Earth body starting from
apogee orbit….
o In first time the apogee circumference 2.58 mkm (r=0406mkm) is
contracted to produce the moon orbit average circumference 2.41 mkm
(r=0.384mkm) and the energy is stopped here again…
o In the second time the Energy at apogee radius r= 0.406 mkm faces the
relativistic effects and produce the total solar eclipse radius r= 0.378
mkm and stopped here….
But
- The moon orbit energy had to reach to Earth body to complete the process
because the moon orbit is created from Earth daily motion energy, so the
distance between apogee (r=0.406 mkm) and perigee (r=0.363 mkm) (which is
an Energy), this distance (0.406 mkm – 0.363 mkm = 43000km) is contracted
by the rate 1.0725 mkm and reach to the Earth through Perigee point which is
the only point connected with the Earth body directly
- 43000 km = 1.0725 x 40080 km (Earth Circumference =40080 km)
- Earth rotates around her axis daily producing this distance =40080
km = Earth Circumference …. That means Earth Circumference is
created by this process and the previous story was related to Earth
motion Energy before the matter birth.
- That means the energy from higher points (apogee, average and total solar
eclipse radiuses) will be sent to Perigee point because it is the only point is
connected to the Earth directly…
- Who will carry the Energy from higher to lower points?….. The Moon….
- Now we can see why the three points are distinguish from perigee point
because they receive their energy by 2 different trajectories of Energy….
This story proves we have discussed in my previous paper
Research Paper" The Solar Day Production"
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0426
or
https://www.academia.edu/s/95094e05e0/the-solar-day-production
or
https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis/the-solar-day-production
19. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
19
II- The New information
- The energy (2.58 mkm) is sent from the sun to Pluto and in the way received a great effect
from Uranus and sent again to Pluto…. What's Uranus effect?
Uranus Effect
- If we remember Earth first day energy is sent toward the moon and created Perigee Point
radius (363000km) and stopped there… we know that because 2.58 mkm =7.1 x 0.363 mkm
o But The distance (energy) 363000 km = 7.1 x 51118 km (Uranus diameter) …what
does that mean? The Energy had stopped at perigee point and couldn't move further
(at horizontal axis) but because Uranus is perpendicular on the moon orbit
(vertically)….so the energy could be sent on vertical axis to reach to Uranus from
which Uranus diameter is created…. So Uranus effects on the sent Energy drom the
sun toward Pluto! By what energy Uranus practices his effect? By the Energy which
is sent from Perigee point on the first day… what does that mean? The Energy which
is sent to Pluto = total Earth Energy in 2 days! Why? Because the first day energy is
stored in Uranus level and the second day energy is sent from the sun to Pluto and in
the way Uranus added his energy (this is the effect which Uranus practiced on the
sent Energy from the sun to Pluto)
- That explains to us why in the moon orbit the energy is concentrated because 2 days energy
are added to each other and sent to the moon orbit by Pluto…
Please review
Earth Circumference
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0434
20. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
20
Appendix No.1 (Puzzled Data)
(1)
viii. Earth Moon Distance at Perigee point =363000 km = Solar Outer Planets Diameters
Total (error 1%)
ix. Earth Moon Distance at Apogee point =406000 km = Solar Planets Diameters Total
x. The Distance between Perigee and Apogee = 40000km = Inner Solar Planets
Diameters Total = Earth Circumference.
xi. Earth daily motion = The moon orbit circumference at apogee radius (r=406000 km)
xii. Saturn Circumference = Earth Moon Distance at total solar eclipse radius
(r=377000km)
xiii. Note Please/ Solar Planets Diameters Total= 2 Jupiter diameters + 1 Saturn diameter
(i.e. Jupiter diameter = 8 solar planets diameters total)
xiv. 2 Neptune Circumference = outer planets diameters total (without Neptune) (1.8%)
(2)
- Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Pluto Distance = 1375 mkm
- Saturn Pluto Distance =Mercury Neptune Distance = 4437 mkm
- Mars orbital circumference 1433.5 mkm = Saturn orbital distance = Uranus Saturn
distance = Neptune orbital distance /π =
- Jupiter Pluto distance 5092 mkm = Uranus Neptune distance x π
- Saturn orbital distance 1433.5mkm= Saturn diameter x Venus diameter =
(Venus Circumference)2
=
(3)
- Sun Diameter = Jupiter Diameter x π2
(error 1.4%)
And
- Saturn Diameter = Venus Diameter x π2
(error 0.8%)
(4)
- Jupiter orbital Period 4331 days = Mars Orbital Period 687 days x 2π (error 0.3%)
- Mars Orbital Period 687 days = Earth Orbital Period 365.25 days x 1.9 (Mars orbital
inclination = 1.9 degrees)
- Mars Orbital Period 687 days = Moon Orbital Period 27.3 days x 25.2 (Mars axial
tilt= 25.2 degrees)
- Saturn orbital period10747 d.=Earth orbital period 365.25 d. x Synodic month 29.5 d.
(5)
- 17.4 degree (inner planet orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 17.2 degree (Pluto orbital
inclination)
- 23.6 degree (outer planet orbital inclinations total) x 0.99 = 23.4 degree (Earth axial tilt
(6)
- Mercury moves a distance = 720 mkm during his day period (4222.6 hours)
(Mercury Jupiter Distance = 720 mkm)!
- Venus orbital circumference = 680 mkm but Venus Jupiter distance = 670 mkm
(error 1.5%)
- Earth orbital circumference = 940 mkm but Earth Jupiter distance (when both of them be at
2 different sides from the sun = 778.6 mkm +149.6 mkm = 928.2 mkm (error 1.25%)… why
3 planets define their orbital distances relating to their positions from Jupiter?!
Simply…. Are these relationships found based on Geometrical Reasons or by pure coincidences?
… I suggest that… these relationships are found based on Geometrical Reasons
21. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
21
Appendix No. 2 The 2737 Phenomenon
(The Planets alignment in December 2012)
( I called: The Egyptian Astronomic Phenomenon 2737)
1- Introduction
On 3rd
December 2012 aligned 3 planets (Mercury, Venus
and Saturn) on the three Great Pyramids heads in Egypt, the
Phenomenon repeated just once each 2737 years.
I called this phenomenon
"The 2737 Egyptian Astronomic Phenomenon"
In this paper I present the proof that the 2737 Egyptian
Phenomenon Cycle depends on the Moon Metonic Cycle!
And then in the 3rd
Chapter I'll discuss how the three planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn)
depend on the Earth- moon orbit in their motions!
In this introduction I'll refer just to some interests we got by the 2737 Egyptian
phenomenon.
Some interests we got by 2737 Egyptian phenomenon:
First we know that the Pyramids builders recognized the different astronomic cycles,
and especially 2737 phenomenon, for that they built just 3 pyramids at its parallel
line.
Second, we know that the Pyramids builders knew the relative distances between the
planets and built the pyramids at their rates!
Third where the 2737 phenomenon repeated on 3rd
December 2012 for the third time,
so the Number 8211 years is important number for human life or at least for the
pyramids age.
Fourth, I may claim that the Pyramids builders built the three Pyramids specifically
for the 2737 Egyptian phenomenon.
Note: The Great Pyramid Height is 5776 Egyptian inches = the distance between the
Sun & Pluto (each inch = 1 million kilometer)
22. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
22
1ST
SECTION
Why the Lunar year doesn't correspond with the sidereal year at any cycle?1
We know that the moon turns with the Earth around the sun, so why the lunar year which
equals 354.36 days (lunar Synodic period 29.53 days x 12 months) doesn't correspond to the
Sidereal year that equals 365.25 days at any cycle?
We see the 32 Sidereal year a cycle = 11688 days
But the Lunar year cycle =33 years - 5.81 days =11693.88-5.8= 11688
And why there's this addition 5.81 days to prevent both periods to meet each other
We know that the plane of lunar orbit regresses 19 degrees each year that causes the eclipse
to come early 19 days each year2
So that said the movement of 19 degrees causes change for 19 days
And now we see the lunar year come early 5.81 days, and the lunar plane has inclination to
ecliptic equal approximately 5.14 degrees…
Can I suppose that this difference between Sidereal Cycle 11688 days and Lunar Cycle
11693.88 days which equals 5.8 days caused by the lunar plane inclination 5.14 degrees
(later we will discuss How?) When we divided this inclination value 5.14 degrees (or the
period 5.8 days) at 360 we find that,
The Lunar orbital inclination causes the lunar Synodic day to come early approximately 21
minutes daily..
That lead to the following results
- The correct Synodic month is 29.515
- The correct Synodic year is 354.1818 days And by such way
The lunar cycle which contain 33 Synodic year = 11687.999days
The Sidereal Cycles which contain 32 sidereal year = 11688 days
Where both come to end in the same day
And So the cycle of 32 sidereal years equals 33 modified Lunar Synodic years (modified
lunar year = 354.1818 days) perfectly
1
- the day defines here approximately 86164 seconds where the sidereal year is 365.25 days.
2
- Total Solar Eclipses and how to Observe them- Martin Mobberley- page. 11
23. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
23
2ND
SECTION
The Basic Lunar Year 360 Days
Now I modified the lunar year already from 354.36 to be 354.1818 days
But there's another year related to the moon,
In this year we should added the modified year 354.1818 to the difference of days caused by
the lunar orbital inclination which was 5.8 days approximately
So 5.8+ 354.1818 = 360 days approximately
That's the ancient biblical year And I'll call it
The Basic Lunar Year
Now we have three types of years
- The Basic Lunar Year =360 days
- The modified lunar Synodic year =354.1818 days
- The Sidereal year = 365.25 days
And we'll see how the Metonic Cycle effect on each of them
24. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
24
3RD
SECTION
The 2737 Egyptian Astronomic Phenomenon depends on Metonic Cycle
The Metonic Cycle defines as a moon Cycle continues for 19 Sidereal Orbit year which
equals 6939.75 days, and Metonic Cycle made because the Lunar orbit plane regresses
yearly 19 degrees that causes the eclipses to come early 19 days yearly.
The Following Table shows How The Metonic Cycle Effect On The Different Years
Metonic
Cycle Number
Sidereal
years No.
(365.25
days)
Number of modified Lunar year (equals 354.1818
days)
The Basic lunar Year Numbers (360
days)
For each Metonic CycleLunar years in
each Metonic
cycle
The Lunar years
(354.1818days) Numbers
For each Metonic Cycle
M. Cycle 1 19 S. Year 19 19 Lunar Y. + 210.295 days 19 BLY (Basic Lunar Year) +
99.75d(days)
M. Cycle 2 38 S. Y 20 38 L. Y. +420.59d =
39 L. Y + 66.408 d
38 BLY+ 199.5 d
M. Cycle 3 57 S. Y 19 58 L. Y + 276.703 d 57 BLY+ 299.25d
M. Cycle 4 76 S. Y 20 77 L. Y +486.998 d =
78 L. Y +132.8162 d
76 BLY+399d =
77 BLY+39 days
M. Cycle 5 95 S. Y 19 97 L. Y + 343.111d 96 BLY+138.75d
M. Cycle 6 114 S. Y 20 116 L.Y +553.406d =
117 L. Y + 199.224d
115 BLY+ 238.5d
M. Cycle 7 133 S. Y 20 136 L. Y +409.519d=
137 L. Y +55.3374d
134BLY+ 338.25d
M. Cycle 8 152 S. Y 19 156 L. Y +265.6324d 153 BLY+438d= 154 BLY+78days
M. Cycle 9 171 S. Y 20 175 L. Y +475.9274d=
176 L. Y + 121.745d
173 BLY+ 17.75d
M. Cycle 10 190 S. Y 19 195 L. Y+ 332.0406d 192 BLY+ 277.5d
M. Cycle 11 209 S. Y 20 214L.Y +542.3356d=
215 L. Y +188.1538d
211 BLY+ 37.25d = 212 BLY+
17.25d
M. Cycle 12 228 S. Y 20 234 L. Y +398.4488d=
235 L. Y +44.267d
231 BLY+117d
M. Cycle 13 247 S. Y 19 254 L. Y +254.652d 250BLY+ 216.75d
M. Cycle 14 266 S. Y 20 273 L. Y +464.857d=
274 L. Y + 110.675d
269 BLY+216.5d
M. Cycle 15 285 S. Y 19 293 L. Y +320.9702d 288 BLY+416.25d= 289
BLY+56.25d
M. Cycle 16 304 S. Y 20 321L.Y +531.2653d=
313 L. Y +17.0834d
308 BLY+156d
M. Cycle 17 323 S. Y 20 332 L. Y +387.378d=
333 L. Y + 33.1966d
327 BLY+255.75d
M. Cycle 18 342 S. Y 19 352L.Y+ 243.4916d 346 BLY+ 355.5d
M. Cycle 19 361 S. Y 20 371L.Y +453.7866d=
372 L. Y + 99.60486d
365 BLY+455.25d=
366 BLY+ 95.25d
M. Cycle 20 380 S. Y 19 391 L. Y + 309.8992d 385 BLY+195d
M. Cycle 21 399 S. Y 20 410 L. Y + 520.1948d=
411 L. Y +166.013d
404 BLY+294.75 d
M. Cycle 22 418 S. Y 20 430 L. Y +376.308d
431 L. Y +22.12626d
423 BLY+394.5d=
424 BLY+ 34.25d
M. Cycle 23 437 S. Y 19 450 L. Y + 232.4212d 443 BLY+ 134.25d
M. Cycle 24 456 S. Y 20 469 L. Y +442.7162d=
470 L. Y + 88.5344d
462 BLY+ 234d
M. Cycle 25 475 S. Y 19 489 L. Y +298.829d 481 BLY+ 333.75d
M. Cycle 26 494 S. 20 508 L. Y + 509.1244d=
509 L. Y + 154.9426d
500 BLY+433.5d=
501 BLY+ 73.5d
M. Cycle 27 513 S. Y 20 528 L. Y +365.2376d= 520 BLY+173.25d
25. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
25
529 L. Y +11.0558d
M. Cycle 28 532 S. Y 19 548 L. Y +221.3508d 539 BLY+273d
M. Cycle 29 551 S. Y 20 567 L. Y +431.6458d=
568 L. Y + 77.464d
558 BLY+ 372.75d=
559 BLY+ 12.5d
M. Cycle 30 570 S. Y 19 587 L. Y + 287.759d 578 BLY+ 112.5d
M. Cycle 31 589 S. Y 20 606 L. Y + 498.054d=
607 L. Y + 143.8722d
597 BLY+ 212.25d
M. Cycle 32 608 S. Y 20 626 L. Y + 354.1872=627 L.
Y
616 BLY+ 312d
M. Cycle 33 627 S. Y 19 646 L. Y + 210.295 635 BLY+ 441.75d =
636BLY+51.75d
M. Cycle 34 646 S. Y 20 665 L. Y + 420.5754d=
666 L. Y + 66.3936d
655 BLY+151.5d
M. Cycle 35 665 S. Y 19 685 L. Y + 276.6886d 674 BLY+ 251.25 d
M. Cycle 36 684 S. Y 20 704 L. Y +486.9836d=
705 L. Y ++132.801d
693 BLY+ 351 d
M. Cycle 37 703 S. Y 19 724 L. Y + 343.096d 712 BLY+ 450.75d
=713BLY+90.75d
M. Cycle 38 722 S. Y 20 743 L. Y + 553.391d=
744 L. Y + 199.2092d
732 BLY+190.5d
M. Cycle 39 741 S. Y 20 763 L. Y +409.5042d=
764 L. Y + 55.3224d
751BLY+289.5d
M. Cycle 40 760 S. Y 19 783 L.Y + 265.6174d= 770BLY+389d=
771 BLY +29 days
26. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
26
The Previous Table Study classified into 2 parts
First Part : The study of the column of the modified lunar year (which equals
354.1818days)
1- Each 32 Metonic Cycles the last day of modified lunar year (equals 354.1818 days)
corresponds with the last day of Metonic cycle which is the Sidereal Year last day
where the lunar modified years equal 627 lunar years that equals 608 sidereal years
perfectly.
2- The difference days between the Modified lunar year with the Metonic Cycle moves
in Cycle and decreases as following (66.4- 55.33- 44.26- 33.19- 22.126- 11.0558 –
0.00 days) at 98 years interval (98 modified Lunar years – which equals 354.1818
days)
3- The modified Lunar years number for each Metonic Cycle shown in the table, and I
found the following Modified Lunar Year order "19-20-19-20-19-20" repeats once
with each Cycle consist of 627 modified Lunar year
a. That means with the last day of the Metonic Cycle No. 32 which equals 608
Sidereal Years but equals 627 Modified lunar year. after this Cycle ends, and
starts the new one the modified lunar year order 19-20-19-20-19-20 will
repeat once again as a mark for the new Cycle starting (this order in table
marks by Gray color)
b. We can call the Metonic Cycle no. 32 a Cycle for the modified Lunar year
with the Metonic Cycle (this Cycle in Table remarked by Yellow)
Second Part: The Study Of The column of the Basic Lunar Year ( equals = 360 Days)
1- We see in the table the day common fractions spread through the cycles but these
fractions unify to be one day each 4th
Metonic Cycle which equals 76 Sidereal years
(that similar to the Sidereal Year, 3 years equals 365 days and the 4th
year is 366
days)…..
2- but after 4th
Metonic Cycle the last day of Basic Lunar year (which equals 360 days)
doesn't correspond the last day of the Metonic Cycle because there are 39 days
addition to the Basic Lunar years (means 76 Sidereal years = 77 Basic Lunar Years
+39 days). And with the following cycles this number increases regularly by addition
39 days each 76 Sidereal years. (so after more 76 years we finds at the 8th
Metonic
Cycle 154 Basic Lunar Year + 78 days…. And that continues)
3- But at Metonic Cycle No. 40th
which equals 760 Sidereal Years we find this number
equals 771 Basic Lunar years + 29 days, and that means the rest days decreased
27. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
27
from 39 days to be 29 days during period (760 Sidereal Years -76 Sidereal years
= 684 years) and this is the difference between the Metonic Cycle No. 4 and Metonic
Cycle No. 40…and all that says… EACH 684 SIDEREAL YEARS, THE REST
DAYS DECREASE 10 DAYS
4- Now we know that 39 days prevented the basic lunar year to end in the same day
with the 4th
Metonic Cycle, and we know this period 39 days decreases by 10 days
each 684 sidereal years, and that means we need four Cycles which will decrease the
39 days to be (-1 day) which is the most near to the metonic Cycle.
5- Now we need 4 Cycles of the period 684 years where These 4 Cycles Equals 2736
Sidereal Years
6- And based on that the 2736 Phenomenon was a Metonic Cycle and this period was
needed to Correspond the Basic Lunar year with the last day of Metonic Cycle (the
Basic Lunar Year equals 360 days – the bible year which no one considers in modern
life)
7- Now we saw 39 days which found in Metonic Cycle No. 4, have decreased as
(10/10/10/9) at interval 684 Sidereal years for each 10 days, by that we found the
2737 Egyptian phenomenon for which we researched,
8- But still there are two questions, first about the number because we got the Cycle of
2736 Sidereal Years and not 2737 Sidereal Years, and the second question about the
last day we need because 39 equals (10/10/10/9) and the decreasing EACH 684
years equals 10 days and that means the last cycle will have -1 day
We still have 2 question to answer respectively
The First Question
says we got relation to the Cycle 2736 Sidereal years and not to 2737 Sidereal years phenomenon?
And how 2736 Cycle related to 2737 Cycle?
the answer
As we know Metonic Cycle is 6939.75days
We know Saros Cycle is 6585.35 days
And the difference between both is 354.2 days
Which equals a modified lunar year approximately..
28. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
28
While Metonic Cycle connected to Saros Cycle completely because the Metonic Cycle is The lunar
Orbit Cycle and Saroc Cycle is The Eclipse Cycles that made by the Moon itself.. all that say to us,
there's great connection between both Cycles..
Because there's a complete year difference between them (regardless the explanation of How that
occur!)
And we see this Cycle 2736 Sidereal years needs a complete sidereal year to be our phenomenon
2737 …
So Both connected with Great Relation
While the first one depends on the Metonic Cycle that means the second also does.
The Second question about the minus day
39 days we found and the decreasing is 10 days each 684 Sidereal years means after 4 Cycles
(2736 Sidereal years) the number 39 will decrease to be -1 day.. means the Metonic Cycle will
finish after the last Basic lunar year day with one complete day..
So each 2736 Sidereal years we have -1 day
So this Cycle will continues to be 10 (-10) days and to consume in one Cycle 3736 Sideral Years
Where 27360 Sidereal years = 1440 Metonic Cycles (which we may call astronomy full day where
the solar day equals 1440 Minutes).
A comment on
The Egyptian Astronomic Phenomenon 2737
I'm very surprised that there's no any study dealt "the 2737 Egyptian astronomic
phenomenon"!
I see that not logical because the phenomenon tells us there were other people understood
perfectly the universe astronomy and they gave us a great gift by building the great three
pyramids as a references to such phenomenon, so why the modern astronomy doesn't try to
compare our knowledge with theirs through encourage the studies and reports about this
2737 Egyptian astronomic phenomenon.. actually it's illogical to neglect such very great gift
we didn't work for, but even got it without any payments or efforts, and its data are available
to us to compare our knowledge with ancient knowledge and correct ourselves if it's
necessary!!
5-3 Is there an Earthquake, will be done as a result for the 2737 phenomenon?
- Earth moves toward the sun 1 km daily … means during 8211 years (2737 years x 3)
the Earth moves 3 million km toward the sun
i.e. Earth Orbital distance was 153 million km and become now 150 million km
- The greatest Earthquake may be done during 17/7/2018 to 28/7/2018
29. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
29
AUTHOR CURRICULUM VITAE
(https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous/CurriculumVitae)
CONTACTS - Name : Gerges Francis Tawdrous
- Mobil : +201022532292
- Telephone : +222550186
- E-mail :georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com
- Address : 11 Mohmed Rageb St – madenet El Saada
El Materiya – Cairo – Egypt
EDUCATION
(All Certificates
Are Attached)
- Moscow -Russia –Peoples Friendship University
Of Russia –Since 2009 Till 2013 –Faculty Of Science.
- Nizhniy Novgorod –Russia- The Russian Language
Training Course 2007- 2008.
- Goethe institute - Cairo – 2001 to 2007
- Ain Shams University - Cairo- Bachelor Degree Of
Commerce -2000
LANGUAGES I provide the following translation
English into Arabic and vice versa
Russian into Arabic
German into Arabic
SERVICES Translation, Proofreading, and Editing.
The rate around 3500 words daily
WORK
EXPERIENCE
I have worked as freelance translator since 2003 till now,
so I gained a great expertise in different fields.
I achieved special experience in the legal, economic &
technical fields, So I provide the perfect translation for the
contracts, agreements, memorandums, specifications,
laws, decrees, …etc.
I provide the English authenticated translation (acceptable by
all courts, official organizations and the foreign embassies)
COMPUTER SKILLS I am an experienced computer user, I work with MS Office (Word,
Excel, etc.), Reader, Adobe Acrobat (full), WinZip, WinRar, etc.
PERSONAL
DATA
Date of Birth : 09/10/1974 – Cairo.
Martial status : Single
Nationality : Egyptian
Religion :Christian
BEST REGARDS
30. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
30
31. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
31
32. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
32
33. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
33
34. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
34
35. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
35
Author Other Papers
I- The Holy Bible Studies
The Tabernacle Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/pdf/1701.0344v1.pdf
II- The Physics & Astronomy Studies
Space Has Different Densities of Energy
http://vixra.org/abs/1901.0107
The Moon Orbit Triangle
http://vixra.org/abs/1901.0082
Theory of Matter Creation (Lorentz Length Contraction Reason) (II)
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0473
Theory of Matter Creation (Lorentz Length Contraction Reason) (part I)
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0459
Earth Circumference
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0434
The Solar Day Production
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0426
The Moon Orbital Motion
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0200
Pluto Velocity Analysis
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0160
The Moon Motion is A Relativistic Motion
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0132
Why Energy has Different Forms?
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0116
Pluto Data Shows a Relationship with Earth
http://vixra.org/abs/1812.0036
The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0523
The Moon Orbit Analysis
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0422
The Moon Geometry
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0389
1st Degree in Physics Needs 24 Years!! (My Story)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0339
The Moon Motion Trajectory
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0313
"Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"(Part2)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0188
"Neptune Data shows The Solar Group Geometry"
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0178
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square (Proves2)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0163
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square (Proves)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0147
36. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
36
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0135
Solar Planets Motions Trajectory is A Pyramid or A Cone? (Part II)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0096
Solar Planets Motions Trajectory is a Pyramid (Part i)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0076
The Solar Group Geometrical Structure is A Pyramid (Revised)
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0060
Earth Axial Tilt
http://vixra.org/abs/1811.0013
The Observer Effect On The Observation Results (Space = Energy=mc2)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0343
Definition of Space (Revised)
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0307
Does The Moon move by Gravity?
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0089
Kepler 3rd Law Explanation (a Claim Against Nobel Prize Board Decision in Physics 2018
http://vixra.org/abs/1810.0053
Metonic and Saros Cycles Harmony Reason
http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0559
The Solar Group Main Equation (Part 2)
http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0468
The Solar Group Main Equation
http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0186
The Solar Group Main Energy
http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0152
Jupiter Uranus Distance (Metonic Cycle Reason) (revised)
http://vixra.org/abs/1809.0043
"Metonic Cycle proves,, Solar Planets Motions depend on Their Cooperation,,
http://vixra.org/abs/1808.0566
Mercury Day = 3 Mercury rotation periods =2 Mercury orbital periods, Why?
http://vixra.org/abs/1808.0588
Mercury Jupiter Distance (revised)
http://vixra.org/abs/1808.0495
The Solar Group is One Machine (Proves)
http://vixra.org/abs/1808.0081
Solar Planet Gravity Equation
http://vixra.org/abs/1808.0012
The Moon Orbit Geometrical Structure (revised)
http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0449
84 Minutes are Required for Mercury Day
http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0412
Pluto was "The Mercury Moon"
http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0331
Saturn Data Proves Mars Immigration
http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0301
37. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
37
Mars Immigration Proves (Revised)
http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0268
Solar Planet Motion
http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0220
Mercury Velocity
http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0208
Solar Planet Diameter Creation Rule
http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0208
All Manuscripts
https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
contacts
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All papers
https://www.slideshare.net/search/slideshow?searchfrom=header&q=gerges+francis+papers+