This document analyzes data from Mars and other planets in our solar system to argue that the concept of rest mass is incorrect. It presents equations showing relationships between planets' orbital periods, distances, and other properties. For example, it shows that Mars' axial tilt of 25 degrees appears as a constant in equations using Kepler's second law to relate orbital period and distance for each planet. It aims to prove that planets are deeply dependent on each other, rather than having independent, fixed masses. The goal is to establish an alternative view of the universe where mass is created and influenced by motion rather than being an intrinsic property. It uses Mars as an initial case study but plans to further analyze orbital distances, inclinations, and masses of other
The Planets Basic Equations (Gerges Equations)Georgy Tawdrous
This document presents a theory that the planets in our solar system form a single harmonious system that works together with the Sun. The author aims to prove that the masses of the planets are created by their motions, rather than masses causing motion via gravity. They define mass as an accidental form dependent on and controlled by motion. Several chapters are outlined to prove this theory by presenting new definitions of mass and deriving equations for orbital properties like distance and period based on these definitions. The theory goes against the standard gravitational view of mass as an intrinsic property.
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System? Gerges francis
This document discusses whether Saturn was the last planet created in the solar system. It presents several pieces of data showing relationships between Saturn's orbital characteristics and those of other planets like Mars, Venus, and Earth. The author argues this shows Saturn's data was dependent on and came after the other planets, indicating Saturn was created last. The document's main conclusions are that Saturn was the last planet created and that the solar system planets were created relative to each other, with their data dependent on one another.
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion) Gerges francis
The document discusses the geometry of the solar system. It provides data on planetary properties and proposes that:
1) The solar system is a single trajectory of energy, with each planet representing a point on that trajectory.
2) All planetary data, such as diameters, masses, and orbital distances, are created relative to each other based on a single underlying equation.
3) Jupiter plays a central role, with its diameter determining the total diameter of all planets and its energy owning the main energy of the solar system. Equations are presented showing relationships between Jupiter and Saturn.
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)Gerges francis
Why The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory is An Ellipse?(revised)
Abstract
1- Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory Is A Square (A Conclusion)
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory (because of Earth and moon motions)
3- Both forms of trajectory (square and circular) get interaction together and produce the ellipse trajectory as the planet motion final trajectory…. That's why the direct observation shows the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse (Kepler 1st Law is correct)
4- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim (i.e. the perihelion and aphelion points of planet motion trajectory proves that, this ellipse is produced by interaction between square and circular trajectories of motion)
5- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done because of Uranus and Neptune effects…
6- The interaction effect between the square and circular trajectories is found through the rate (4/π)
7- This effect is transported into the moon orbit in form (400/π) – and this transportation is done as Energy Transportation….
8- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
This paper completes the discussion in my previous paper
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
Vacuum Energy Theory Basics:
-Vacuum stores Energy (Space is Energy)
-Vacuum stores Energy with different capacities (Space has different densities of Energy).
-Vacuum with higher storing Capacity (Space with higher density of Energy) goes to upper location vertically relating to other Space Layers (as shown in the figure).
-The solar group has 9 Space layers (Mercury Level is the highest Layer vertically)
-Each Space Layer has different density of Energy (different Capacity)
-Each Space layer stores Energy….from this Energy the planet matter is created and the layer rest Energy is used as potential energy which will transferred into Kinetic Energy to be used for this planet motion.
-The relativistic effects (specifically Lorentz length contraction) leads to increase the Vacuum storing capacity of Energy (i.e. increase the Space density of Energy)
-The Previous description explains why the solar group motions trajectory is in a pyramid form.
-The solar group original Energy is provided by the Earth
Paper hypothesis:
-Jupiter Cycle of 8 of Jupiter days (=79.2 hours), this Cycle effects on Uranus Orbital Period (30589 solar days)
The hypothesis Explanation:
-Jupiter cycle of 8 days proves that, Uranus orbital period (30589 solar days) can be used as (30589 seconds)!
-That tells us, different rates of time are found in the solar system, and tells also that, several interactions are found between the planets motions which we can't discovered because these interactions are done on different rates of time
-Shortly … Because
-Light motion features are found in the planets motions, Classical Mechanics Science can't help us to discover all interactions found between planets motions, Instead we have to use Relativistic Motions Science to discover these interactions.
Paper Objective:
-The paper discusses the interaction between Jupiter and Uranus Motions which is seen in the dependency of Uranus Orbital Period & Jupiter 8 Days Cycle.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This paper proposes hypotheses about how the moon was originally a light beam and how its orbital motion relates to the creation of matter in the universe. It discusses how the moon may have transitioned from a light state to a matter state based on interactions with another light beam. The paper aims to follow the moon's progression from light beam to planet and back again in order to better understand how matter and space are created in the solar system. Key points discussed include the moon orbit being related to the distance traveled by a 1.16 mkm/sec light beam in 1 second, and how the moon's mass and gravity were created from its original light state.
The Planets Basic Equations (Gerges Equations)Georgy Tawdrous
This document presents a theory that the planets in our solar system form a single harmonious system that works together with the Sun. The author aims to prove that the masses of the planets are created by their motions, rather than masses causing motion via gravity. They define mass as an accidental form dependent on and controlled by motion. Several chapters are outlined to prove this theory by presenting new definitions of mass and deriving equations for orbital properties like distance and period based on these definitions. The theory goes against the standard gravitational view of mass as an intrinsic property.
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System? Gerges francis
This document discusses whether Saturn was the last planet created in the solar system. It presents several pieces of data showing relationships between Saturn's orbital characteristics and those of other planets like Mars, Venus, and Earth. The author argues this shows Saturn's data was dependent on and came after the other planets, indicating Saturn was created last. The document's main conclusions are that Saturn was the last planet created and that the solar system planets were created relative to each other, with their data dependent on one another.
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion) Gerges francis
The document discusses the geometry of the solar system. It provides data on planetary properties and proposes that:
1) The solar system is a single trajectory of energy, with each planet representing a point on that trajectory.
2) All planetary data, such as diameters, masses, and orbital distances, are created relative to each other based on a single underlying equation.
3) Jupiter plays a central role, with its diameter determining the total diameter of all planets and its energy owning the main energy of the solar system. Equations are presented showing relationships between Jupiter and Saturn.
Why the solar planet motion trajectory is an ellipse (revised)Gerges francis
Why The Solar Planet Motion Trajectory is An Ellipse?(revised)
Abstract
1- Solar Planet Motion Real Trajectory Is A Square (A Conclusion)
2- This square trajectory is seen by us as circular trajectory (because of Earth and moon motions)
3- Both forms of trajectory (square and circular) get interaction together and produce the ellipse trajectory as the planet motion final trajectory…. That's why the direct observation shows the planet motion trajectory as an ellipse (Kepler 1st Law is correct)
4- Planet Eccentricity supports this claim (i.e. the perihelion and aphelion points of planet motion trajectory proves that, this ellipse is produced by interaction between square and circular trajectories of motion)
5- The square and circular trajectories interaction is done because of Uranus and Neptune effects…
6- The interaction effect between the square and circular trajectories is found through the rate (4/π)
7- This effect is transported into the moon orbit in form (400/π) – and this transportation is done as Energy Transportation….
8- Saturn is the main player in the solar group geometry
This paper completes the discussion in my previous paper
Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Is A Square And Not An Ellipse
Vacuum Energy Theory Basics:
-Vacuum stores Energy (Space is Energy)
-Vacuum stores Energy with different capacities (Space has different densities of Energy).
-Vacuum with higher storing Capacity (Space with higher density of Energy) goes to upper location vertically relating to other Space Layers (as shown in the figure).
-The solar group has 9 Space layers (Mercury Level is the highest Layer vertically)
-Each Space Layer has different density of Energy (different Capacity)
-Each Space layer stores Energy….from this Energy the planet matter is created and the layer rest Energy is used as potential energy which will transferred into Kinetic Energy to be used for this planet motion.
-The relativistic effects (specifically Lorentz length contraction) leads to increase the Vacuum storing capacity of Energy (i.e. increase the Space density of Energy)
-The Previous description explains why the solar group motions trajectory is in a pyramid form.
-The solar group original Energy is provided by the Earth
Paper hypothesis:
-Jupiter Cycle of 8 of Jupiter days (=79.2 hours), this Cycle effects on Uranus Orbital Period (30589 solar days)
The hypothesis Explanation:
-Jupiter cycle of 8 days proves that, Uranus orbital period (30589 solar days) can be used as (30589 seconds)!
-That tells us, different rates of time are found in the solar system, and tells also that, several interactions are found between the planets motions which we can't discovered because these interactions are done on different rates of time
-Shortly … Because
-Light motion features are found in the planets motions, Classical Mechanics Science can't help us to discover all interactions found between planets motions, Instead we have to use Relativistic Motions Science to discover these interactions.
Paper Objective:
-The paper discusses the interaction between Jupiter and Uranus Motions which is seen in the dependency of Uranus Orbital Period & Jupiter 8 Days Cycle.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
This paper proposes hypotheses about how the moon was originally a light beam and how its orbital motion relates to the creation of matter in the universe. It discusses how the moon may have transitioned from a light state to a matter state based on interactions with another light beam. The paper aims to follow the moon's progression from light beam to planet and back again in order to better understand how matter and space are created in the solar system. Key points discussed include the moon orbit being related to the distance traveled by a 1.16 mkm/sec light beam in 1 second, and how the moon's mass and gravity were created from its original light state.
The document discusses motion transportation among solar planets. It proposes that planets motions create different time rates, such that 1 hour of Mercury motion = 24 hours of Uranus motion. It aims to prove this by showing Venus and Uranus motions interact such that 1 hour of Venus motion = 17.7 hours of Uranus motion. The document analyzes Venus' rotation period and planetary motion cycles to support its hypothesis.
In this paper we compare between the physics current theories which try to explain the solar system motions and the planets real data – this is a known process in physics
Example No. 1
Lorentz Length Contraction Phenomenon tells that- a particle with length L0 will be contracted to L1 when this particle travels with high velocity motion.
¬¬¬
So the question is – Why the particle length is contracted with high velocity motion?
Some physics books tell that, this contraction is just illusion of measurements!
That means, Lorentz Transformations measure illusions and not facts!
We refused that,
But if the particle own length contracted by high velocity motion –that will make the particle properties as a function of its motion – means –Particle mass is created by this particle motion
Newton told us a planet moves basically by masses gravity with the sun - so what's first and what's the second? what's the reason and what's the result
The mass causes the motion (Newton) or the motion defines the mass (Lorentz)?
Similar to this argument we will discuss how to discover the solar system.
Paper Objective
The paper tries to show that Jupiter Data can't be explained by the solar system current theories.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry Gerges francis
-Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 seconds a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter
-But, The Earth moon circumference =10921 km
-We are astonished, and asked, how a planet circumference can be used as a period of time? But the answer was "It's Just Pure Coincidence Of Numbers!"
- There's no doubt that this answer is mistaken
- Even if, we provide more examples – as this one –
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 7510 seconds a distance = 51118 km = Uranus Diameter!
- But, Pluto circumference =7510 km
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon creation effect on the solar system geometry (revised)Gerges francis
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Question
Can Jupiter effect on Earth motion?
The Question Explanation
- 142984 km (Jupiter diameter) x 1047 = 149.6 mkm (Earth orbital distance)
- Where
- 1047 = The sun Mass / Jupiter Mass
- Many data shows that, Jupiter can effect on Earth & its moon motions, for example
- 10921 km (The moon circumference) x 449197 km (Jupiter circumference) = 4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference)
Paper Claim
- The masses gravity forces is one of many ways by which Planets motions can effect on each other- but it's not the only way – where there are many other ways by which far planets can effect on the inner planets motions
- These ways depend on the solar system geometrical design, because the geometrical rules based on which the solar planets data is created provide different ways of Planets motions effect ability on each other.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Earth moves with light velocity relative to the sun (i)Georgy Tawdrous
The Earth moves with C velocity (light velocity) relative to the Sun
i.e.
The light is produced by The Earth Motion, where
The Earth transforms her motion mechanical waves into light waves, producing the light beams
These light beams travel to the sun and reflect on her where the sun is just a mirror.
The Earth Motion = The Solar Planets Daily Velocities Total based on new time rate defined by the Earth.
Total Solar Eclipse Phenomena proves the following claim.
- The Solar group is one Trajectory of Energy and Each Planet is a point on it
- The Solar group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in this same machine
- The solar group can be similar to one body and each planet is a member in this same body (where the same energy creates all solar planets and their orbital distances, similar to the blood which causes to create all body members)
- Also the solar group is a similar to a great river has many canals where these canals create soils on their banks (the soils are similar to the planets and the canals are similar to the orbital distances)
- The solar planets motions are done in cooperation with each other to perform one job where each planet motion does one task in this same great job
Clearly
The total solar eclipse is done because of a geometrical reason which creates the planets diameters (and even the sun diameter) in geometrical relationships with their distances to enable the total solar eclipse to be occurred
Shortly
No one Solar Planet can be found or move independent from the other planets (even the sun can't be found without the solar planets)
Observation vs data analysis as astrophysics research methodGerges francis
The document discusses using planet data analysis as an astrophysics research method rather than relying solely on observational results. It argues that observational results without data analysis can lead to imaginary concepts. It provides examples showing relationships between various planetary properties like diameters, radii, and orbital distances. The document suggests the solar system should be viewed as one interconnected machine rather than independent planets, and questions concepts like the randomness of planetary formation and definitions of units like distance.
Earth axial tilt 23.4 degrees effects on many other solar planets in addition to the Earth,
Which proves that,
The solar group is one body (or one machine), each planet should be considered as a member in this same body where all solar planets are created from the same energy.
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one?
1- The Cycle 2737 years is a real one
2- The Cycle 2737 years refers to the sun inner main changes
3- The Sun energy depends on the solar planets motions energies accumulation (and doesn't depend on any nuclear interactions occurring inside the sun)
i.e. the solar planets motions mechanical waves (Energy) are transferred into light waves (Energy= sun rays)
4- Solar planet motion energy is accumulated daily and technically by lorentz length contraction effect, where solar planet motion is a relativistic one.
5- Solar planet motion energy is concentrated inside the space regularly and technically by lorentz length contraction phenomenon, where the space stores Energy with different densities.
6- Solar Planets Motions Energies Total Produces The Sun Rays
7- The moon daily motion shows the lorentz contraction effects in the solar group, i.e. the Lorentz contraction effects are found daily and that means the planet usual daily motion causes lorentz effects which causes the Space stored energy to be concentrated..
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- The document discusses the idea that the solar system is not a collection of separate bodies orbiting the sun, but rather one interconnected system where each planet's motion and properties depend on and influence the others.
- It analyzes data about planetary diameters, orbital periods, and motion distances to find mathematical relationships and argue that planets' characteristics were designed based on an underlying geometric structure rather than independent masses.
- In particular, it notes that Earth, the Moon, and Pluto move equal distances in their day periods, and explores how Saturn's orbital period may relate to the creation of different rates of time across the solar system.
No Random Process Causes The Solar Group Creation (No Big Bang) Gerges francis
The Main Conclusion
The solar group can't be created by any random process.
i.e.
The Big Bang Concept is Unreal
The previous conclusion is produced easily and clearly through the solar planets data analysis..
That means…
The Big Bang Theory contradicts strongly and clearly with the solar planets data analysis and their geometrical meanings which supports the claim that, the big bang concept is Unreal one.
This paper tries to show and prove this contradiction and to show that the solar planets data analysis is the best way to understand the solar group origin and motion which necessitates to review many other theories concern the solar group origin an motion.
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper discuss if this fact supports the hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
3- The Moon Day Period Discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mars Migration Theory Supports The Conclusion That "Saturn Must Be Created After The Earth Moon Creation"
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)Gerges francis
Paper objective
The paper provides (1-50) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion analysis – The questions are:
1- Why do Venus and Uranus rotate on their axes, or spin, in a clockwise direction?
2- Does aether wind exist?
3- What are the major and most effective refutations of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity? Question Asked December 6, 2019.
4- Which is the most convincing physical experiment (Not Thought Experiment) that conclusively validates Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity?
5- The advance of Mercury perihelion is achieved in Newtonian gravity
6- Is Gravity a Push or a Pull?
7- Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?
8- Life on Mars: Open discussion
9- What do you think about wave-particle duality?
10- Is there somebody who believes in the theory of Everett (multitude of universes)? Do Einstein's Field Equations allow multiple universes?
11- Do the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable distance in between them?
12- What's underline the Lorentz transformation? And what's the dimension of the space?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planets Data Analysis Curriculum
1- Define And Discover The Directed Data
2- Suggest a hypothesis to explain how this directed data is created (the new hypothesis should depend on old hypotheses in one feature at least).
3- Provide other data arranged according to this new hypothesis to prove its credibility
4- Conclude the geometrical rule based on which the mentioned data is created
5- The concluded geometrical rules form the general geometrical design
6- Use all hypotheses to form one general hypothesis.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
What's The Solar Planet Nature?
The Planet existence proves 3 claims at least
1- The planet existence is a proof that, There's a relationship between other planets based which the new planet is created.
2- The space is Energy with different densities
3- The Matter is created from Space by energy accumulation process
(Shortly, The Planet Is A Relationship Between Other Planets)
I.e.
The first Matter in universe is created from Space Energy, and any other matter is created by this same way …., but… The Second Matter Is Created In Geometrical Relationship With The First One…
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
El documento proporciona instrucciones para aplicar herramientas ofimáticas como Microsoft PowerPoint. Explica los conceptos básicos de PowerPoint e incluye pasos para crear una presentación en blanco. También describe los elementos clave de la interfaz de PowerPoint como la barra de título, la barra de acceso rápido, la banda de opciones y el área de esquema.
mapa conceptual,
1. ¿Cuál es el rol principal de un profesional en el desarrollo de proyectos basados en una excelente gestión de proyectos?
2. ¿Qué elementos son necesarios para que pueda garantizarse un ciclo de vida de un proyecto completamente?
3. ¿Quiénes son los principales responsables de establecer adecuadamente el ciclo de vida de un proyecto?
The document discusses motion transportation among solar planets. It proposes that planets motions create different time rates, such that 1 hour of Mercury motion = 24 hours of Uranus motion. It aims to prove this by showing Venus and Uranus motions interact such that 1 hour of Venus motion = 17.7 hours of Uranus motion. The document analyzes Venus' rotation period and planetary motion cycles to support its hypothesis.
In this paper we compare between the physics current theories which try to explain the solar system motions and the planets real data – this is a known process in physics
Example No. 1
Lorentz Length Contraction Phenomenon tells that- a particle with length L0 will be contracted to L1 when this particle travels with high velocity motion.
¬¬¬
So the question is – Why the particle length is contracted with high velocity motion?
Some physics books tell that, this contraction is just illusion of measurements!
That means, Lorentz Transformations measure illusions and not facts!
We refused that,
But if the particle own length contracted by high velocity motion –that will make the particle properties as a function of its motion – means –Particle mass is created by this particle motion
Newton told us a planet moves basically by masses gravity with the sun - so what's first and what's the second? what's the reason and what's the result
The mass causes the motion (Newton) or the motion defines the mass (Lorentz)?
Similar to this argument we will discuss how to discover the solar system.
Paper Objective
The paper tries to show that Jupiter Data can't be explained by the solar system current theories.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry Gerges francis
-Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 seconds a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter
-But, The Earth moon circumference =10921 km
-We are astonished, and asked, how a planet circumference can be used as a period of time? But the answer was "It's Just Pure Coincidence Of Numbers!"
- There's no doubt that this answer is mistaken
- Even if, we provide more examples – as this one –
- Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 7510 seconds a distance = 51118 km = Uranus Diameter!
- But, Pluto circumference =7510 km
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The moon creation effect on the solar system geometry (revised)Gerges francis
The Moon Creation Effect On The Solar System Geometry (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Question
Can Jupiter effect on Earth motion?
The Question Explanation
- 142984 km (Jupiter diameter) x 1047 = 149.6 mkm (Earth orbital distance)
- Where
- 1047 = The sun Mass / Jupiter Mass
- Many data shows that, Jupiter can effect on Earth & its moon motions, for example
- 10921 km (The moon circumference) x 449197 km (Jupiter circumference) = 4900 mkm (Jupiter orbital circumference)
Paper Claim
- The masses gravity forces is one of many ways by which Planets motions can effect on each other- but it's not the only way – where there are many other ways by which far planets can effect on the inner planets motions
- These ways depend on the solar system geometrical design, because the geometrical rules based on which the solar planets data is created provide different ways of Planets motions effect ability on each other.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Earth moves with light velocity relative to the sun (i)Georgy Tawdrous
The Earth moves with C velocity (light velocity) relative to the Sun
i.e.
The light is produced by The Earth Motion, where
The Earth transforms her motion mechanical waves into light waves, producing the light beams
These light beams travel to the sun and reflect on her where the sun is just a mirror.
The Earth Motion = The Solar Planets Daily Velocities Total based on new time rate defined by the Earth.
Total Solar Eclipse Phenomena proves the following claim.
- The Solar group is one Trajectory of Energy and Each Planet is a point on it
- The Solar group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in this same machine
- The solar group can be similar to one body and each planet is a member in this same body (where the same energy creates all solar planets and their orbital distances, similar to the blood which causes to create all body members)
- Also the solar group is a similar to a great river has many canals where these canals create soils on their banks (the soils are similar to the planets and the canals are similar to the orbital distances)
- The solar planets motions are done in cooperation with each other to perform one job where each planet motion does one task in this same great job
Clearly
The total solar eclipse is done because of a geometrical reason which creates the planets diameters (and even the sun diameter) in geometrical relationships with their distances to enable the total solar eclipse to be occurred
Shortly
No one Solar Planet can be found or move independent from the other planets (even the sun can't be found without the solar planets)
Observation vs data analysis as astrophysics research methodGerges francis
The document discusses using planet data analysis as an astrophysics research method rather than relying solely on observational results. It argues that observational results without data analysis can lead to imaginary concepts. It provides examples showing relationships between various planetary properties like diameters, radii, and orbital distances. The document suggests the solar system should be viewed as one interconnected machine rather than independent planets, and questions concepts like the randomness of planetary formation and definitions of units like distance.
Earth axial tilt 23.4 degrees effects on many other solar planets in addition to the Earth,
Which proves that,
The solar group is one body (or one machine), each planet should be considered as a member in this same body where all solar planets are created from the same energy.
Is the 2737 Phenomenon a real one?
1- The Cycle 2737 years is a real one
2- The Cycle 2737 years refers to the sun inner main changes
3- The Sun energy depends on the solar planets motions energies accumulation (and doesn't depend on any nuclear interactions occurring inside the sun)
i.e. the solar planets motions mechanical waves (Energy) are transferred into light waves (Energy= sun rays)
4- Solar planet motion energy is accumulated daily and technically by lorentz length contraction effect, where solar planet motion is a relativistic one.
5- Solar planet motion energy is concentrated inside the space regularly and technically by lorentz length contraction phenomenon, where the space stores Energy with different densities.
6- Solar Planets Motions Energies Total Produces The Sun Rays
7- The moon daily motion shows the lorentz contraction effects in the solar group, i.e. the Lorentz contraction effects are found daily and that means the planet usual daily motion causes lorentz effects which causes the Space stored energy to be concentrated..
Paper question
How Does The Gravity work?
The Question Explanation
- The motion at distance is one basic question still needs a sufficient answer.
- The mass gravity concept gives us no geometrical mechanism or any explanation concerns the gravity works mechanism, so we don't know if the gravity needs time or works immediately, or if the gravity causes the space to be formed in some geometrical form to perform the gravity effect.
- We have only the word (gravity) which means, some mass will cause another mass to be moving at distance but no details how this motion is done …
- Venus and Saturn motions data gives some reference that these 2 planets motions depend on one another.
- How Venus and Saturn motions can be performed depending on each other? Whatsoever the answer is, it means, (some effect at distance) is found between these 2 planets.
- Can this effect be a reason for the motion at distance which we search for?
The paper analyzes the 2 planets motions data to see if such effect can be found between the 2 planets and How this effect can be transported from one planet to another?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
- The document discusses the idea that the solar system is not a collection of separate bodies orbiting the sun, but rather one interconnected system where each planet's motion and properties depend on and influence the others.
- It analyzes data about planetary diameters, orbital periods, and motion distances to find mathematical relationships and argue that planets' characteristics were designed based on an underlying geometric structure rather than independent masses.
- In particular, it notes that Earth, the Moon, and Pluto move equal distances in their day periods, and explores how Saturn's orbital period may relate to the creation of different rates of time across the solar system.
No Random Process Causes The Solar Group Creation (No Big Bang) Gerges francis
The Main Conclusion
The solar group can't be created by any random process.
i.e.
The Big Bang Concept is Unreal
The previous conclusion is produced easily and clearly through the solar planets data analysis..
That means…
The Big Bang Theory contradicts strongly and clearly with the solar planets data analysis and their geometrical meanings which supports the claim that, the big bang concept is Unreal one.
This paper tries to show and prove this contradiction and to show that the solar planets data analysis is the best way to understand the solar group origin and motion which necessitates to review many other theories concern the solar group origin an motion.
Jupiter Has A Cycle Of 8 Days (II) (Revised) Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis:
Planet day period is defined depends on other planets motions
Paper objective:
The paper discuss if this fact supports the hypothesis (Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion)
Paper contents
1- Planet Velocity And Diameter Relationship
2- Planet Day Period Definition
3- The Moon Day Period Discussion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Mars Migration Theory Supports The Conclusion That "Saturn Must Be Created After The Earth Moon Creation"
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (II)Gerges francis
Paper objective
The paper provides (1-50) questions and answers concerns the solar system motion analysis – The questions are:
1- Why do Venus and Uranus rotate on their axes, or spin, in a clockwise direction?
2- Does aether wind exist?
3- What are the major and most effective refutations of Einstein’s Theories of Relativity? Question Asked December 6, 2019.
4- Which is the most convincing physical experiment (Not Thought Experiment) that conclusively validates Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity?
5- The advance of Mercury perihelion is achieved in Newtonian gravity
6- Is Gravity a Push or a Pull?
7- Is our solar system exemplary for all other planetary systems?
8- Life on Mars: Open discussion
9- What do you think about wave-particle duality?
10- Is there somebody who believes in the theory of Everett (multitude of universes)? Do Einstein's Field Equations allow multiple universes?
11- Do the Gravitational force in between two objects depends on the most probable distance in between them?
12- What's underline the Lorentz transformation? And what's the dimension of the space?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planets Data Analysis Curriculum
1- Define And Discover The Directed Data
2- Suggest a hypothesis to explain how this directed data is created (the new hypothesis should depend on old hypotheses in one feature at least).
3- Provide other data arranged according to this new hypothesis to prove its credibility
4- Conclude the geometrical rule based on which the mentioned data is created
5- The concluded geometrical rules form the general geometrical design
6- Use all hypotheses to form one general hypothesis.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
What's The Solar Planet Nature?
The Planet existence proves 3 claims at least
1- The planet existence is a proof that, There's a relationship between other planets based which the new planet is created.
2- The space is Energy with different densities
3- The Matter is created from Space by energy accumulation process
(Shortly, The Planet Is A Relationship Between Other Planets)
I.e.
The first Matter in universe is created from Space Energy, and any other matter is created by this same way …., but… The Second Matter Is Created In Geometrical Relationship With The First One…
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
Did Lorentz Ask (How The matter is Created)Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
Lorentz believed, The matter is created out of light, or at least, the matter is created by an effect of Light velocity.
The Question Explanation
- There are 2 basic proves for the paper hypothesis which are:
- Lorentz Transformation Equations
- Lorentz Space Mechanical Features
- The paper argues, because Lorentz believed, the matter is created out of light, the transportation of energy among matters be a basic feature.
- The transportation of energy among matters can be used in another form. (A motion transportation among the solar planets)
- The motion transportation among the solar planets is a massive important process because it may explain how the motion at distance is done.
- The masses gravity theory gives us no geometrical mechanism by which a mass can cause another mass motion. Also we can't attribute any mechanical features to the space which transports the gravity effect from one mass to another.
- The paper provides a proof that, Venus Motion Data is transported to Saturn and used as Saturn motion data.
- By that, the paper shows, Some Transportation of (DATA) be done between the 2 planets which may prove (A Motion Is Transported Among The Solar Planets)
- The motion transportation among the planets (if be proved) will be a suitable solution to answer the question (how the motion at distance is done?) and also will be supported by Lorentz studies and equations…
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
El documento proporciona instrucciones para aplicar herramientas ofimáticas como Microsoft PowerPoint. Explica los conceptos básicos de PowerPoint e incluye pasos para crear una presentación en blanco. También describe los elementos clave de la interfaz de PowerPoint como la barra de título, la barra de acceso rápido, la banda de opciones y el área de esquema.
mapa conceptual,
1. ¿Cuál es el rol principal de un profesional en el desarrollo de proyectos basados en una excelente gestión de proyectos?
2. ¿Qué elementos son necesarios para que pueda garantizarse un ciclo de vida de un proyecto completamente?
3. ¿Quiénes son los principales responsables de establecer adecuadamente el ciclo de vida de un proyecto?
Este documento presenta los resultados de un análisis de control de calidad realizado a un producto farmacéutico llamado Fungirex. El objetivo fue determinar el porcentaje de principio activo (óxido de zinc) contenido en el producto. Se midió un 106% de concentración de óxido de zinc, dentro de los parámetros establecidos. Por lo tanto, el Fungirex cumple con los requisitos de calidad.
This document analyzes the stresses, deformations, and modes of failure experienced by an aluminum longboard under typical usage conditions through finite element analysis. It examines a standard "two foot" loading condition to simulate cruising, a concentrated "one foot" load to simulate weight distribution, and impact loads. Three design iterations are analyzed and improved to maximize efficiency without compromising structural integrity. Analysis includes static loading, buckling, fatigue, and modal analyses. Key results show stress distributions and frequencies to understand longboard response under general use.
A RÚSSIA COMO VOCÊ NUNCA VIU - BELÍSSIMOLucio Borges
San Petersburgo fue fundada en 1703 por el zar Pedro el Grande como la nueva capital del Imperio Ruso y para conectar a Rusia con Europa, sirvió como capital durante más de 200 años hasta que la Revolución Rusa trasladó la capital de nuevo a Moscú. Actualmente es la segunda ciudad más grande de Rusia y su centro histórico es Patrimonio de la Humanidad por la UNESCO, también alberga importantes museos, teatros y palacios a lo largo del río Neva.
1. O documento discute a importância de indicadores de desempenho e sistemas de apoio à decisão para melhorar a competitividade e sustentabilidade de empresas.
2. É proposta a aplicação desses indicadores e sistemas na área operacional de uma empresa alimentícia para identificar e corrigir problemas de gestão de estoques.
3. O estudo de caso analisa a situação dessa empresa e propõe a implementação de ferramentas como Lean Six Sigma, Balanced Scorecard e PDCA para melhorar seus processos e indicadores.
A collection of quotes from American educator, author, businessman, and keynote speaker. His most popular book was The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, Stephen Covey.
This document is a 16-page presentation about SEO and rich snippets created with Haiku Deck presentation software. It was created by Heidi Schmidt and contains photos on several pages attributed to different photographers.
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravityGerges francis
The Sun Obliquity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun obliquity on ecliptic (7.25 degrees) proves that, Earth Is Found Before The Sun Creation.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The paper hypothesis tries to disprove Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- While Newton told us, The Sun Is The Planet Motion Reason, the paper hypothesis tells, Earth is found and moving before the sun creation. as a result, we conclude that, Earth Motion Doesn't Depend On The Sun.
- This conclusion be valid for all solar planets. Means, Newton Theory of The sun mass Gravity is mistaken.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Abstract
The Total Solar Eclipse tells us…
the sun/moon diameters = Earth orbital distance/ Earth moon distance
No geometrical reason behind !
The solar planets creation theory tells us, a big star was following the sun, and exploded, from his material the solar planets were formed by the gravity …
i.e. The Solar Planets were created Randomly, and so any relationship as the previous one must be found by "Pure Coincidence"!
I suggest, alternative theory concerns the solar group creation…let's write it:
- The solar planets were created Relating Geometrically to each other and Not Randomly.
- The Matter in general is produced in pairs relating geometrically (or in some other features) and there's no any matter is found individually.
- The solar group is one building, each planet is a component in this same building, that's why each planet has a geometrical relationship with one or more of other planets …
- The sun is created related to the solar planets geometrically.
To support my theory let's use Einstein Equation E=mc2
We consider Each Particle Mass & Energy is independent from any other Particle Mass & Energy…
But let's suppose that, there's One General Energy (E), for the whole universe.
So the universe will be as a puppets theatre, the puppets are the masses but all of them are connected together in the General Energy
i.e.
Each Planet (Particle) Energy Is Created Connected To This General Energy, And So They Are Connected & Related Geometrically To Each Other…. that's what my theory suggests
Research Summary
I- Research Main Questions
1- How Planet Diameter Is Created? (= How The Matter Is Created?)
2- How Planet orbital distance is defined (= What's The Space?)
3- Is There A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
(i.e. Does Space effect on Matter Creation Process?)
II- Research Methodology
I use the planets data analysis to discover the concepts on which they are created?
(I use NASA Planetary Fact Sheet as the only source for Planets Data)
III- Research Hypothesis
(A) Research Primary Hypothesis (have no proves)
- The Matter is created of Energy (E=mc2 supports this idea)
- The Space is Energy (my Hypothesis)
(B) Research Main Hypothesis (have proves)
1- The Solar Group is One Building And Each Planet is A Part Of It
2- There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group
3- Mars Orbital Distance is Changed Through Solar Group History
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Doesn't Move By The Sun Mass Gravity Gerges francis
- The document discusses the hypothesis that the solar system distances were created in a network form by a light beam with a velocity of 1.16 mkm/s.
- It argues that the distances between planets cannot be independent, as Newton claimed, but are instead defined geometrically based on each other.
- As evidence, it notes that 50% of all distances in the solar system are equal to each other, and 40% are related by the same ratio, proving the distances are part of a single geometrical design rather than being created independently.
- The hypothesis is that the light beam first created one planet and its distance, then used that distance to create the next, in a network, disproving
Jupiter Orbital Distance Proves, We See Wrongly The Solar Group,Gerges francis
This paper tries to prove the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis No. (1)
- Jupiter Is The Solar Group Central Point
- Jupiter Orbital Distance contradicts the solar group current description
Hypothesis No. (2)
- Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Can't Be An Ellipse
- Earth Moon motion effects on our vision and force us to see Planet Motion Trajectory as an ellipse (which is a wrong vision)
Mercury Jupiter Distance with Mercury other data supports my claim that,
"The Solar Group is One Machine, Each planet is One Gear In It"
Let's review this idea here again….. I suggest that,
The Matter is created from Energy (this is true based on the Equation E=mc2)
The Distance is created from Energy (my hypothesis)
That means, the Matter and Distance are created from the same Energy,
That means, the whole solar group is created from the same one energy which guarantees the motions harmony.
The matter should be seen as point of light coherence or energy lines connection where the energy is carried in the distances as in matters
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
Abstract
- The Solar Planets motions are relativistic motions
- Earth real Velocity = 0.99 c
- The time is an Energy
- Based on Relativistic Motions, the distances values can be seen as time values
i.e.
- The time is equivalent for the distance
(a development for the Special Theory of Relativity made by me)
- The Solar group geometrical structure depends on the time and Distance equivalence (based on relativistic motions), to create different rates of time, which enables the system to accumulate the Energy
Let's summarize this idea in following:
- Based on the solar group relativistic motions, time and distances values are equivalence
- The solar geometry uses unified distances to create different values of time, which are seen by different cycles
- The time different values depend on each other to create different rates of time
- By this different rates of time the Energy can be accumulated to produce huge energy from average one.
- Based on this description, the solar planets motions produce the sun light beams
Solar planet data geometrical concepts disproves the current theoryGerges francis
I claim that, the Solar group current theory and description are incorrect completely And
contradict directly with the solar planet data geometrical meanings…
let's discuss one example only for explanation…
Example No.1
How the planet orbital distance is defined? How does the planet move? By gravity…
The gravitation equation defines the planet orbital distance… !
Let's examine this answer
1st critic /
Mercury – Venus – Earth ….. these 3 planets order lead us to conclude that, there's some relationship between the planet diameter and his orbital distance
With a clear rule
"Greater Diameter needs Greater Orbital Distance"
The current theory tells us this is pure coincidences!
But
There's similar order (but reversed). Let's see that
Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto
The previous order tells us a reversed rule
"Greater Diameter needs Shorter Orbital Distance"
Something is occurred with Mars which caused the rule to be reversed after Mars!
The current theory still consider this second order also as "pure Coincidences"
But
Uranus Diameter is greater than Neptune Diameter, where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus… that tells us the solar planets order is done depending on the diameter and not on the mass! disproving the gravity concept …!
This critic also is "pure coincidences", the current theory still insists …
2nd Critic/
If the planet moves by gravity, and defines his orbital distance by the gravitation equation, which depends on the masses, why Jupiter isn't in place of Mercury? Why the greatest Mass has no shortest orbital distance? According to the gravitation equation (m/r2)? The told answer is because of the initial points!! And why we accept the gravitation equation based on that if there's no any proof for it?!
For myself I try to understand and don't believe deeply the current theory
So the conclusions are clear before my eyes
1- There's A Relationship Between The Planet Diameter And His Orbital Distance
2- Mars causes Disturbance For This Relationship
In this paper I provide many similar points which disprove clearly the current theory and push us to find more sufficient theory to explain the solar group origin and motion.
Paper Hypothesis
The Universe Is A Continuum
Explanation
Question no. 1
If the universe is a continuum why that disprove the big bang concept?
Because – in this case – the universe will no longer be created by some random process otherwise it can't be a continuum – to be a continuum its components should be created complementary to each other to consist together one continuum
Question no. 2
Why does the Special theory of relativity prove that the universe is a continuum?
Einstein told that Space-time is a continuum but he didn't tell that the universe is a continuum- Space-time is coordinates consist one continuum because it's coordinates –means – the time and distance values are defined by the point position in space-time – So when Einstein told the Space-time is a continuum he didn't effect on the universe geometry itself – he simply provided a new geometry to define the coordinates
But
When we accept the hypothesis that – the universe is a continuum - that means -we accept that the particle properties are defined by coordinates!
Specifically – that means – Particle Mass will be defined as time and distance in the space-time coordinates! But particle mass is a particle property and can't be defined by any coordinates! We have 2 different visions here!
But … in fact ....the particle high velocity motion changes its time, length and MASS
So, simply if the mass can be added to the space-time and defined as particle coordinates – so the special theory of relativity disproves the big bang theory
Otherwise –it can't …. In this paper I try to prove that – practical mass is defined as distance & time values – all of them are space-time coordinates – that proves the hypothesis – the universe is a continuum – and disproves the big bang theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Arguments
- The paper provides 2 basic arguments
- (1st Argument)
- The Paper disproves Newton Theory of The sun mass gravity and proves that the solar planets motions can't be independent motions from one another but each planet motion depends on other planets motions.
- This discussion concludes that, the solar system distances be created in a network form, integrated together in one geometrical design.
- The argument conclusion is (The solar planet move one unified general motion)
- The 1st Argument Depends On (Jupiter Motion Analysis)
- (2nd Argument)
- The Paper claims that the solar planets motions be accompanying with a light beam motion which provides the required energy for the planets and their distances creation (because matter is created of energy and space is created of energy)
- The light motion accompanying with the solar planets motions cause the planets to move one unified general motion.
- The 2nd Argument Depends On (Mercury Motion Analysis)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second) and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse draws the cart –Similar to that – light motion leads planet motion- based on that light motion is the energy source by which planet does its motion)
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Jupiter And Mercury Motions Analysis (Revised)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity and Planet Motion Independency Concept.
- Because
- Jupiter Motion depends on Mercury and Mars Cycles Periods
- This dependency proves that,
- The solar planets motions be integrated into One Unified Motion
- Means,
- The solar planets be similar to gears move in one machine they do their motions in comparison with each other, or
- The solar planets be similar to train carriages they move together One Unified General Motion
- The solar system distances be similar to railways be built by energy and the planets be similar to trains move on these railways
- Jupiter Motion analysis disproves Newton theory in 2 basic points which are
- (1) The Planet Motion Can't be Independent from the other planets motions
- (2) The Planet Motion Be done by the same force by which Planet Matter is created, Because the motion features be effective in Planet Matter Dimensions.
Paper Conclusion
- The Solar System Distances Be Created In A Network Form And Based On One Geometrical Design.
- Means
- The distances be distributed based on geometrical design in comparison with other distances and no a single distance be created independent from the other distances
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Kepler 3rd law explanation (a claim against nobel prize board decision in ph...Gerges francis
A claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision – in Physics -2018
Best Greetings
I send this paper as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board - for their decision - for Nobel Prize in physics 2018
Of course I have nothing against the great people who receive the Nobel Prize in Physics 2018 and I congratulate them for their great works
But at my side, I found there's a serious question here
Because I explained frequently in my research that, there's a serious contradiction in physics current theories and we can't understand the solar group geometry if no one solves this contradiction…
I Provided many hard arguments to prove this claim and thought that, the Nobel Prize Board will support me to solve this contradiction in physics.
But I found the Board decision avoids my work!
For that reason I summarized the main idea in this paper and send it as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board
And I wish the board will accept to give me a chance to explain and defend my point of view..
With the Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers
http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Why should we refuse the decision of nobel prize for physics 2021Gerges francis
Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Abstract
Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
Paper question Explanation
- Mars was the second planet after Mercury with original orbital distance 84 mkm but Pluto was the mercury moon revolves round it.
- There was one more planet found at a distance 71 mkm from the sun.
- Mars was collided with this planet and destroyed it. as a result
- Mars and Pluto were migrated from their original orbital distances.
- Mars had migrated from (84 mkm) to its current position (227.9 mkm) and through its displacement, Mars had collided with Venus and Earth and caused the Earth moon creation. based on this story, Mars itself had collided with Earth and caused the moon creation (not the ancient plant theia)
- The planets migration were done before the sun creation and caused serious negative effect on the solar system. that explains how Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken where the sun is created after all planets creations and motions. so how the sun can be the planets motions reason?
- How can I know this data?
- By Using The Planets Motions Data Analysis.
- The solar system is created as one machine, and the planets and their distances be distributed geometrically in a network form. by that the planets migration caused registered changes in the solar planets motions data.
- Again
- Why Should We Refuse The Decision of Nobel Prize for Physics 2021?
- Because
- While Newton theory of the sun mass gravity is mistaken clearly, and contradicts the planets motions data. and while Newton theory which is lived since 400 years prevented any real progress in the solar system understanding, and while tenths of papers be written against Newton theory and its negative effects on the solar system general understanding.
- And while, tenths of papers and thousands of pages be written with hundreds of questions and contradictions against the negative effect of Newton theory...
- The Nobel Prize Decision 2021 sees nothing of that. We are again be under Newton theory umbrella. No logic they have in their decision but by force they forced to remove the correction in the physics book. And then for one more year the physics teachers over Earth will teach the lies of Newton and every student have to learn!
- The Decision Is Mistaken
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Motion Depends On A Light Beam Motion Gerges francis
Paper hypothesis
- The Solar system motion depends on a light beam motion.
The hypothesis explanation
- There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec in the solar system
- The solar system is created out of this light beam energy. The light energy creates The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances
- Based on this vision
- The solar system motion depends on this light beam motion.
- As a result
- This light beam effects are seen frequently in the planets motions data. because the planet is similar to a puppet on the puppets theater, the light motion is the main player behind and by that the light moves by using planets motions data and the light motion effects on these planets motions data.
- The hypothesis tells another universe be found behind the universe of matter and the important news is that, the hidden universe causes the matter universe motion.
- By that, the solar planets don't move by the sun mass gravity. The solar planets are similar to ships found on a sea they move by this sea waves. Where the sea is the light motions, because of that the light motions define the planets motions range and creates their motions data.
Paper Objective
- The paper proves the light motion existence behind the planets motions and proves also that the light motion cause the planets motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation (More Discussion)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Data Analysis As Astrophysics Scientific Method.pdfGerges francis
Planet Data Analysis As Astrophysics Scientific Method
Abstract
Paper Discovery
- Planet Data Analysis should be considered the astrophysics research basic method.
- The paper proves that – We have to use planets data analysis to discover how the solar system be created and moving – the method provides safe approaches to conclude the facts and protects from the imaginary ideas –
- On the other side –
- Planets data analysis method proves – The big bang theory is wrong and Newton theory of the sun gravity is wrong – (also the method proves one light beam its velocity 1.16 million km per second be found) –
- The method opens a new page in the physics book because it provides a new source of knowledge to discover how the solar system be created and moving.
- The paper provides a new concept tells
(Planet Data Be Created Based On Geometrical Rules And Exact Equations)
And (One Law Controls All Planets Data)
- Based on this new concept – Planet Data Analysis can show The Geometrical Rules based on which this planet be created and moving.
- The paper explains and proves the idea shortly.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Similar to Mars Data Analysis proves the Rest Mass Concept is Unreal (20)
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
The document discusses Kepler's law that a planet's orbit defines its velocity. It provides 5 points to explain this: 1) Planet data is based on exact equations, not random factors. 2) A planet's diameter should be indirectly related to its orbital distance to avoid breaking during motion. 3) A planet's mass affects its orbital inclination and limits variables in diameter equations. 4) A function is needed between a planet's orbit and velocity to connect variables like rotation period. 5) Newton's gravity theory and the Big Bang theory are incorrect because planet data requires exact geometrical rules, not chaos. The document aims to show planetary motions result from one precise geometrical design, not random forces.
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Mars Data Analysis proves the Rest Mass Concept is Unreal
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
1
Mars Data Analysis
proves
The Rest Mass Concept Is Unreal
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
2
Mars Data Analysis
proves
The Rest Mass Concept Is Unreal
Gerges Francis Twadrous
2nd
course student – Physics Department - physics & Math faculty –
peoples' friendship University – Moscow – Russia
gfrancis@yandex.ru / gergesfrancis@yandex.ru /+201022532292
ABSTRACT
The Solar Group Planets Data shows, There's A Real Dependency between
The Planets, in Their existences, Structures, Masses and Motions.. etc
I chose Mars Data as entrance to show The Real Dependency of Mars Basic
data on Earth & Venus Data!
The Dependency of the Solar Group Planets on each other, is showed &
proved by the Planets Basic Data analysis..
So The Planets Dependency On Each Other tells Us, That
The Rest Mass Concept Is Unreal
I.e. The Planet Mass (Matter) is not independent
I.e. The Planet Mass (Matter) is created by the Planet Motion, portable
by the Motion & controlled by the Motion..
I.e. The Planet Motion Doesn't Cause By The Gravitational Forces!
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
3
1- Introduction
The Solar Group Planets Data Analysis shows, A Deep Real Dependency
between The planets, in Their existences, Structures, Masses and
Motions.. etc
Which tells us that
The Mass (matter) is not independent
I.e. The Rest Mass Concept Is Unreal
I may describe the Matter as An Ice Mountain on the sea water where the
Motion is the sea water..
Another example, the Matter is similar to the computer screen mouse
which considers as indicator for the Motion direction
In this paper I present the Proof that
"The Planets Deep Dependency is Truth"
"Deep dependency" I.e. the dependency in their existences,
Structures, Masses and Motions.. etc
The Proof tools discussion is presented in "The Research Methods"
But the disproving of The Rest Mass Concept provides us with a universe
alternative Vision as following:
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
4
2- Universe Alternative Vision
This research Theory
All solar group planets, including the sun, all of them just One
System of Motions or may be called One Machine, and this
machine does One Task
i.e.
All The Planets work Together In Harmony With The Sun To
perform One Duty (One Job)
For that Reason
The Components of this one system (i.e. The Solar group Planets
& the Sun) are depended on each other, connected with each
other and suitable for each other in their existences, Masses &
Motions …etc
SHORTLY,
This Theory tells Us, That
The solar group planets with the sun consists One Harmonious
Motions System, and this motions system creates the Planets
Masses, Orbits, Cycles and all other planets properties to be suitable
to this harmonious motions system.
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
5
3- The Mass Alternative Definition
The universe alternative Vision gives us a real shock because it
contradicts strongly with the universe classical vision, So why we can't
see the universe by such alternative vision? That Because we consider
The Mass As Independent Property! Because we see the Motion
Cycles individually thinking each Cycle related to her Mass & the mass is
independent!. Where no one imagines that The Cycle Motion Was Found
Already Before The Mass and The Mass is found As Indicator to refer to
the Motion direction!!
Through the Universe Alternative Vision, I provide
The Mass Alternative Definition:
The Mass (Matter) is not independent property but dependent on the
Motion, created & portable by the Motion.
The Mass is an accidental form, found based on the Motion, controlled by
the Motion, and without Motion the Mass will disintegrate
Based on that,
The Rest Mass Concept Is Unreal
&
The Planet Motion Doesn't Cause By The Gravitational Forces!
So Let's try to prove that in the following item "The Research Methods"
Note: This definition doesn't tell us "the Mass has no gravitation force", it's not true,
The Mass surely has gravitation force,
As the Ice Mountain has heavy weight on the Sea Water.
But the Mass is portable by the Motion and created by it (So The Mass gravitational
forces doesn't cause the Plant motion), in dealing with the Planet motion we'll discuss
this concept in more details.
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
6
4- Methods of Research
To prove "The Rest Mass Concept Is Unreal" I need to prove..
There is A Deep Real Dependency between The Solar Group Planets.
A Deep Real Dependency between The planets, means the Planets
Dependency in Their existences, Structures, Masses, inclinations, and
Motions.. etc
Which tells us that
The Planet Basic data is dependent on Other Planets Data
I.e. The Mass Is Not Independent
But dependent on the Motion, created by the Motion & portable by the
Motion..
So, If I prove Any Planet depends On The Other Planets Data to form
& define his Mass, Diameter, Orbital inclination, Orbital distance or
Orbital period…. etc
That means I got the proof for my theory i.e. I proved that,
The Planet isn't independent but dependent on the other planets
I.e. The Mass Is Not Independent
I.e. The Rest Mass Concept Is unreal (The research claim)
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
7
For Example
Mars Diameter 6713km = Earth Diameter 12756km/ Mars Orbital
inclination 1.9 degrees
This equation tells us there's some Relation between Earth & Mars
diameters..
So this can be a proof for my argument, and then I will deduce the Mars
Diameter isn't independent!!
Many physicists will find This Is Incorrect Method, where they
consider the previous Mars diameter equation is just "A Pure
Coincidence In Numbers" and so my proof will not be acceptable from
them!
For that reason I need to classify my proving process as following:
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
8
Subject Page No.
Abstract 2
1- introduction 3
2- Universe Alternative Vision 4
3- The Mass Alternative Definition 5
4- Research Methods 6
Contents 8
Part I- The Planets Data Dependency
In this part I provide many data sources proving the
Planets Real Deep Dependency on each other, and I'll
discuss the Meaning of "Pure Coincidence of Numbers".
I use Mars data as entrance to show the planets Data
Dependency, as following:
9
Chapter 1 / The Mars Dependency Data 9
Chapter 2/ The Proves of "The Mass is created by the
Motion"
22
Chapter 2/The Planet Gravity equation
Chapter 2/ The Planet Orbital Period Equation
Chapter 2/ The Planet Mass Equation
Chapter 3/ The Mass definition conclusion 44
Chapter 4/ The Planet Orbital Distance Equation 47
Chapter 5/ The Planet Orbital Inclination Equation 57
Chapter 6/ The 2737 Egyptian astronomic phenomenon as
proof that, The Rest Mass concept is unreal
62
Chapter 7/ Mercury Puzzles & other Coincidences 72
Part II- The Planets Deep Dependency Explanation
In this Part I try to explain why the planets are deeply
depended on each other, and how that is occurred
78
Chapter1/ The Light Theory 79
Appendix No. 1 References 88
Appendix No.2 Historical and philosophical Data about
2737 Egyptian astronomic Phenomenon
91
Author curriculum vitae 95
University certificate 96
Gerges Equations 97
Planetary Fact Sheet – Metric 98
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
9
PART I / Chapter 1
Mars Data analysis shows
The Deep Dependency between the Planets
I- Mars Axial Tilt
Through Kepler second Law using for the solar group planets we find
some interesting information as following
P2
* 25 = d3
Where
- P : The Planet orbital period
- d : The Planet orbital distance
- 25: Mars Axial Tilt
The results are shown in the following table
Planet P2
* 25 = d3
Error
Mercury (88)2
*25 (57.9)3
0.2%
Venus (224.7)2
*25 (108.2)3
0.3%
Earth (366)2
*25 (149.6)3
0
Mars (687)2
*25 (227.9)3
0.3%
Jupiter (4331)2
*25 (778.6)3
1.4%
Saturn (10474)2
*25 (1433.5)3
1%
Uranus (30589)2
*25 (2872.5)3
1.3%
Neptune (59800)2
*25 (4495.1)3
1.5%
Pluto (90588)2
*25 (5870)3
1.4%
The table shows 25 as a fixed number for the 2nd
Kelper law (Planets data
sheet is found at last page of this Paper)
25 Is The Mars Axial Tilt
Surely if Mars Axial Tilt considers the same constant number for the
solar group planets through kepler 2nd
Law, it's a Real prove there's A
Dependency Between the Planets each other.. but the physicists considers
this just "Pure coincidence", So we'll discuss that soon in this chapter.
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
10
II- Earth / Mars Dependency
Mars Data shows his Deep Dependency on Earth & Venus Data, as we'll
see now, but I should refer to the meaning of this dependency between
Mars & Earth.. each planet is created based on his dependency with all
solar group planets. i.e. There's always a deep dependency between any
two planets in the solar group. But I found Mars Data has a clear deep
dependency on the Earth & Venus, for that I use the Mars /Earth
Dependency data as entrance to explain the idea and then the discussion
may extend later.
A- In following I show some of Mars Basic Data depending of the
Earth Data:
1. Mars Diameter = Earth diameter / Mars orbital inclination
(6713.6 = 12756 / 1.9 ….error 1.1%)
2. Mars orbital period = Earth orbital period* Mars orbital
inclination (687 = 365.25 *1.9)
3. Mars Axial Tilt = Mars orbital inclination * (Earth Diameter/
Moon Diameter)2
(25.2= 1.9 * (3.66)2
)
4. Mars Gravity = (1.9)2
(0.642/5.97) *9.8 = 3.7 (Error 2.8%)
Where 1.9 Mars orbital inclination
0.642 Mars Mass / 5.97 Earth Mass /9.8 Earth Gravity
5. (square root of (Mars Axial tilt /Earth Axial Tilt)) = (Mars Day/
Earth Day) (25/23.44)1/2
= (24.7/24)
6. Earth Orbital Cycle * (Earth day/ Mars Day) = Moon Cycle
(365.25 (24/24.7) = 354 days)
7. Mars orbital Cycle 687 days defines 1.9 days/ degree (687 days
/360 degrees = 1.9) where (Mars orbital inclination =1.9 degrees)1
1
- I wish the reader doesn't be annoyed because of the equation No. 7, where the 1.9 presents two
different units, which tells us it's to be a consistent equation, but such equations are necessary for the
claim explanation, So when we reach to the discussion it will be clear how this equation can be
consistent.
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
11
B- In following I show some of Mars Basic Data depending of
Venus& Moon Data:
1- Mars orbital inclination = Venus orbital period / Venus day
period (244.7/116.8= 1.9)
2- Mars orbital inclination = (Venus Complementary Axial Tilt)2
/
Venus orbital inclination ((2.6)2
/3.4 = 1.9) (Note Venus
Complementary Axial Tilt = 180-177.4 where 177.4 is Venus
Axial Tilt)
3- Mars orbital inclination * The complementary Venus Axial tilt
=Moon orbital inclination (1.9*2.6=5.1)
4- Mars Diameter = Moon Diameter * Mars orbital inclination
(6792= 3475*1.9)
5- Moon Sidereal year (27.3*12) = 327.6 = (1.9)4
*25.2 (1.9 Mars
orbital inclination & 25.2 Mars Axial Tilt)
6- Mars Orbital distance = Mars/ Venus distance * Mars Orbital
inclination (227.9 = 119.7 * 1.9).
We should pay attention to this last equation, because all the planets
orbital distance can be defined based on this equation!
This equation has 3 elements which are
A- 119.7 millions km the distance between Venus & Mars
B- 1.9 Mars orbital inclination
C- 3.4 Venus orbital inclination
Because the distance is defined between both of the two planets (Mars &
Venus) and so each planet contributes by his orbital inclination value as
we see in next table,
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
12
The Sun / Pluto distance is classified based on
Venus/Mars distance
Planet The planet orbital distance equation Registered
(error)
Mars Mars orbital distance
227.9= 119.7 * 1.9
0
Jupiter Jupiter orbital distance
778.6 = 119.7 * (1.9)*(3.4)
0.6%
Saturn Saturn orbital distance
1433.5 = 119.7 * (1.9)2
*(3.4)
2.4%
Uranus Uranus orbital distance
2872.5 = 119.7 * (1.9)3
*(3.4)
2.8%
Neptune Neptune orbital distance
4495 = 119.7 * (3.4)3
4.6%
Pluto Pluto orbital distance
5870 = 119.7 * (1.9)6
4%
The Rest Planets
Mercury Mercury orbital distance
57.9 = ((3.4) /(1.9)3
)* 119.7
2.4%
Venus Venus orbital distance
108.2 = ((3.4)/(1.9)2
)* 119.7
4.1%
Earth Earth orbital distance
149.6 = (1.9)1/3
* 119.7
0.9%
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
13
Study of
The Venus/ Mars Distance Table
1- Why This Equation tells Us The Planets Are Depended On Each
Other?
o Because I defined specific 3 values (119.7 m k which is
Mars/ Venus distance, 1.9 degrees which is Mars Orbital
inclination & 3.4 Venus Orbital inclination) So through just
3 Values, it's possible to define the orbital distances for all
solar group planets!! The planets orbital distance interacted
with Thee Constants to produce 10 values correctly, and that
can't be occurred unless the planets themselves are related to
each other in their orbital distances!
o I started with Mars to Pluto, because these planets are found
after the Venus/ Mars distance which we use as a
measurement, and then I completed the rest planets to show
How the Planets are related to each other..
o In all my Equations & Tables I used the following specific
method. I define specific numbers in the basic equation
without a specific form for these numbers using, as we saw
in the Venus / Mars distance Table, I defined 3 values but
didn't define the form of this 3 values using, I left each
planet to use the values as possible to reach to the convenient
data. But I can't explain why I didn't define a specific form
for the three values using here, I should explain that in the
Planet Mass equation, because it's clear enough there, let's
discuss this question there (at end of this chapter).
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
14
Mars Data Analysis Comment
By many ways I explained there's A Real Dependency for Mars data on
Earth & Venus Data..
But the physicists will not accept this data analysis and they will claim
this numbers similarity just "Pure Coincidences" ?
Although there are many different forms for this Dependency in Mars
Data..
But the physicists will consider them as just "Pure Coincidences"!
For that reason I provide the analysis of "the Solar Eclipse Phenomenon"
Trying to explain the meaning of "Pure Coincidences of Numbers"
As following
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
15
III- The Solar Eclipse Data Analysis
The Sun size = 400 folds the moon size, but the Sun/ Earth distance=
= 400 folds the Moon/ Earth distance, for that reason the people on
the earth see the sun size equals the moon size approximately, that
enables the total solar eclipse to be occurred before our eyes!
Is it just "a pure coincidence"? or there's a physical reason caused
the Sun/ Moon sizes rate = the Sun / moon distances to the Earth
rate, to enable the total solar eclipse to be occurred?!
The total solar eclipse appears as a simple pure coincidence, but the
data analysis shows that, there are several many coincidences under
its cover which form a real puzzle … as following:
Quoted from "Total Solar Eclipses and How to Observe Them ….Martin Mobberley' P.11
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
16
A- Eclipse Data Analysis Summary
1- As I mentioned before the sun/moon sizes rate = their
distances rate to the Earth, that's our first coincidence
2- The sun size = 400 folds moon size = 3.66 x 109, where 3.66
is the Earth /moon sizes rate, and 109 is the Sun/ Earth sizes
rate, i.e. Number. 400 of the size, includes the three planets
sizes rates together!
3- The total solar eclipse umbra length = 384000 km and the
lunar umbra length = 1.4 million km where (1.4/0.384 = 3.66)
(3.66=Earth/moon size rate) but that means the earth has such
Specific Moon whose Circumference caused an umbra
length = the distance between the moon and the earth!!
Regardless the Earth location!!
4- Also as we know the Metonic Cycle (which is moon Cycle)
depends on the solar Cycle (19 sidereal years)!. And because
Metonic Cycle ends on the last day of the 19 Sidereal years
(first condition) and because the difference between the Lunar
year 354.3 days and the sidereal year 365.25 days is 11 days
(the second condition) for that the people were enabling to
create the solar lunar calendar!
5- The sun cycle is 365.25 days as the Earth Cycle! Where the
sun give the Earth the same face always, but the Earth Cycle
365.25 = Lunar sidereal cycle 27.3 * (3.66)2
(3.66 is the Earth/
moon sizes rate), so it's Logical the Earth has a cycle 365.25
days depending on the Moon Cycle, but why the Sun has the
same Cycle period?! "Pure coincidence" (Note: may be that
17. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
17
the reason for the Metnoic Cycle which is a moon Cycle to be
depending on the sidereal years & Not on Lunar years)
6- Note that the Earth /moon sizes rate is 3.66, and as I
mentioned the Earth Cycle 365.25 days depends on this rate
where 365.25 = 27.3 * (3.66)2
, but Not just the Earth Cycle
depends on the Lunar Cycle by This Rate (3.66)2
but also The
Earth/ Moon Gravities Depend On This Same Rate!! where
the Moon gravity = (3.66)2
(moon mass/ earth mass) x 9.8 earth
gravity = 1.6 which is the moon gravity!!!… Note! the Sun
itself follows this same equation by which the sun gravity =
274 m/sec2
. (these also pure coincidences) (The planet
gravities equations will be studied in Chapter one/ Part one of
this paper) (NOTE please the value (3.66)2
repeated also in
Mars Data which tells us this relation value refers to a
relation extending through many different Planets!)
18. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
18
Comments On The Eclipse Data Analysis
It's easy to believe all this data just coincidences!
But why we are sure all this data just coincidences?
Is it impossible, there's a mistake in our vision for the universe, and
this mistake leads the data to be seen before our eyes as "Pure
coincidences"
This paper try to show Another Universe Vision, through the
comparison between our principle basics with the Solar group Data
And through this alternative vision we may see much better our
universe. Any way let's try to see the solar eclipse in more depth as
following:
1- We know How the Solar eclipse works, we know that there's a cycle
for the eclipse events called Saros continues for around 18 Sidereal
years, and this Cycle depends on the Lunar Cycle continues for 19
sidereal years Called Metonic Cycle . in Metonic Cycle (as explained
in the Previous figure) The line of nodes regresses 19 degrees
yearly, for that the complete Cycle needs 19 years, and this
regression for 19 degrees every year causes the regression 19 days
for the eclipse events yearly!! (Here The Pure coincidence are found
clearly and easily! : 19 Degrees, 19 Years & 19 Days, Why These
Numbers Aren't "Pure Coincidences"?
2- Why these very similar numbers Not just coincidences in Numbers as
thousands we found in the Planets Geometries which have no physical
Meaning? But they aren't coincidences because we have a real
explanation for all numbers 19 years, 19 degrees & 19 days, we know
these numbers are resulted by the same process. Now this "Pure
Coincidence" will be an explained physical phenomenon, written in
19. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
19
the physics books and teaching to the students!! Why? Because We
Understand The Eclipse Process!! i.e. When we don’t understand
the physics reason for such "Pure coincidences of Numbers" we
consider them just "Pure coincidences", and leave them easily without
explanations!
3- I have another example related to Mercury.. Mercury Synods Saturn,
Uranus, Neptune & Pluto once each 88 days where Mercury orbital
Period is 88 days! Why?! It's "Pure coincidence", No. (Now again it's
clear the similar Numbers "pure coincidences" has physical
explanation. Where Copernicus has equation to define the synodic
period based on the Sidereal period (synodic period = 1/(1/SP1-1/Sp2)
where Sp1 is Sidereal period of first planet and Sp2 is Sidereal period
of Second planet. We should note the value in denominator should be
positive). By this equation we'll find the Synodic Period between short
orbital period planet as Mercury (88 days) and very long period planet
(as Saturn, Uranus, Neptune & Pluto) should be equal to the short
planet orbital period because the value 1/Sp2 will equal Zero. No once
again we have clear explanation why the "pure coincidences" are
found.
4- I have another one, Mercury Synods The Earth once each 116 days
But the Venus Day is 116.8 days & 116.2Π= 365.2 which is the Earth
Cycle Why?!! So It's absolute wrong to consider that just "Pure
coincidence", surely there's a relation between the Mercury/ Earth
synodic period with the Venus Day & Earth Cycle! But we don’t
understand How does the Gears works and for that we don't see the
relation!! (Note 116.8 = 176 "Mercury Day" / 1.5 where the Mercury
Orbital Period 88/ Mercury rotation period 58.6 = 1.5!)
20. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
20
5- I have one more puzzle related to Mercury! " (Π+1) * Mercury orbital
period = Mercury orbital circumference distance!! What's the
Geometrical meaning of (Π+1)!! I don't understand the geometrical
meaning, for that I will consider this is "Pure Coincidence" (by
Numbers (Π+1)* 88 = 2 Π*57.9 = 364)!!!2
6- But why we don't understand the other universe motions?! if we
understood the eclipse motion?! (first Reason) Because we consider
The Mass as the planet independent characteristic property, So we
don’t see the solar group as A System Of Harmonious Motions, but
we see all these motions are related to their Masses individually,
where no One Imagines The Motion Was Found Before The Mass and
regardless the Mass, and the Mass is found just to refer to the
Motion direction. So we can't see the Harmony between these
Planets Motions and for that reason we don’t know THE DUTY
which the planets motions is performed! ( i.e., we don't know the
Planet Cycle result)
7- (Second Reason) the Meaning of the unit. For example what does
mean "1 second", when we study the solar day production process? It's
something as one looks at a mirror! The "1 second" is the result of
Earth Cycle around her axis in front of the Sun, but because the Cycle
still not complete yet, we don't know the meaning of solar day and we
can't find the meaning of the "1second", in this Case we would try to
find another definition till the earth complete her cycle around her
axis, now the Meaning of "1second" may become part of the earth axis
degrees! Or part of the earth rotation radius!! Now the meaning of "1
2
- Actually Mercury Puzzles no one can leave without explanation!, So I should try to
find the correct explanation for this very strange many "Pure Numbers coincidences"
at the End of this Part in Chapter 7 titled "Mercury Puzzle and other Pure
Coincidences"
21. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
21
second" is absolute absent because the meaning "1 second" found after
the solar day is produced …Here we will face the "Pure Coincidences"
of numbers which show similar Numbers but have different
Meaning, as we saw in Mars Data 1.9 days / degree of his Cycle (687
days /360 degrees = 1.9) but Mars Orbital inclination is 1.9 degrees ..
The Same Number But Not The Same Meaning! We remember 19
degrees & 19 days where we understood perfectly the eclipse process!
But with Mars we don't understand his process! So it will be just "Pure
Coincidence"!! which I'll leave without explanation! Easily we should
classify each process data & understand How this process is doing,
and that can be done if we understand the universe basic operations3
!!
8- For Sure no one can call support from Bode Law in all its forms,
where the physics considered Bode Law is a false & misleading law,
spite Bode Law shows the relation between many planets, but Bode
Law was refused without trying to explain why 6 planets follow this
Law and 3 planets don't follow?!
9- The last point here is the argument. I argue that, the similar numbers
which are found in the Planets Geometries are connected numbers
formed by the planet motion (as we saw in the 19 years, 19 degrees &
19 days of the eclipse motion), I argue all similar numbers can be
explained clearly if we understand the universe motions correctly, and
because we don’t understand the universe motions correctly we
may use these "pure coincidences numbers" to lead us to
understand the universe motions.
- 3
In many physics books the authors claimed that the lunar trajectory definition is
very difficult and can't be reachable correctly, which can be a proof that we don't
understand the universe motions correctly.
22. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
22
Chapter 2
1st
- The Proves That "The Matter (Mass) Is Created By The Motion"
In this chapter I provide many astronomic phenomena that supports my
claim "the Matter (Mass) is created by the Motion" as following:
1- The Matter is found in a Motion: all the planets around us just
Matters are found in Cycles & Motions, no any of them appears as
free or independent Matter (Mass). So why the gravitation theory
describes the mass is independent property &found regardless the
Motion?! where can we find a Mass (Matter) without motion? Even
for the creatures bodies Matters (the animal has a blood cycle for his
body, the planet has a juice cycle)
So the Motion is the essential component of the Matter (Mass)
2- The Matter (Mass) Is Found In Dual Forms!
(i.e. 2 opposite forms of the same creature),
There are electron and positron!
There are female & male!
There are Matter & Antimatter
Two opposite forms of the Masses,
So How the Matter (Mass) can be INDEPENDENT if there's
another opposite form?!
The Matter (Mass) is produced based on something which can
create the TWO FORMS,
I guess it's logical conclusion.
And the collision between the Electron & positron produce light!! So,
that what I'm saying, the electron & positron Matters return to their
origin once again. I want to explain that the Matter (Mass) is created
by the Motion, and the Motion attributes to the light
23. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
23
So why The Mass is independent?!
3- The Planet Matter (Mass) structure formed in Spherical Form to
be suitable with The Planet Motion rotation round his Axis. For
that reason The Planet is a spherical form, and no any planet is in
squared or triangular form, because the spherical forms are the best
suitable forms for the Planets Motions (the planet rotation around his
Axis). Someone claims the Motion ease in Space doesn't depend on
the Planet geometrical form, and this idea is incorrect, because we
have no Equation connected the planet geometrical form with his
orbital distance, and I guess the non-spherical Planet needs longer
orbital distance, that which I need to prove later (where I provide a
proof the Sun/Planet distance depends on the Planet diameter in my
Equation to define the Planets orbital distances which I provide in
Chapter four/ Part One of this paper). But Also others claim the
cylindrical forms can be suitable as much as the spherical forms, and
this idea also is incorrect because, we have no a register for the planet
Motions history, so if in case the Planet Axis turns 90 degrees, in any
very special case and the Planet had to continue his motion, the
spherical form will be very suitable but the Cylindrical form will not
work. (Note there's many planets regresses in their motions in
behaviors not explained completely, So it's not some strange idea to
turn the Planet Axis 90 degrees in special case and to continue his
motion)
4- The Matter (Mass) can be created by the Light. As we know from
Anderson experiment 1934 when he produced Electron & positron
from Gamma Rays (1.2 Mev), and so easily we see the Matter (Mass)
is a product and not origin i.e. the Mass isn't independent.
24. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
24
5- The Universe continuous Motion tells us the Motion is the basic
factor in the Universe and Not the Matter (Mass). Actually the
gravitation theory definition of the Mass is just against the Universe
continuous Motion (Specially the inertia definition)
6- The Universe Wave Nature which is found in the Matter, energy,
motions and all other Universe components, this Wave nature tells us
the Universe has one source. i.e. all the universe origins from one
Source. So we may consider that the Motion is the origin of this
universe, and the Motion characteristic property is the wave nature. So
when the Matter is created by the motions, the Motion nature still
showed and seen in the Matter.
7- The Human & Universe Harmony: For example why the creatures
are sleeping at Night and wake up during the Day? Because their
bodies made of light motion (Matter is created by the motion) and
when the sun "their source" is absent, the creatures feel the fatigue and
sleep. This process produces the harmony between the universe &
creatures, where there's no light, the human should learn Not to work!!
If The Creatures Bodies Masses Are Independent How Such Harmony
Can Be Performed?!!
8- The Planets Gravities Equation. This equation we'll study in details
here, where we'll find that, the Planet Gravity depends on The planet
relative Mass density, which makes the Earth diameter/ Planet
diameter rate effects in the planet gravity equation. So we find the
diameters rate effects on the Planet gravity which proves that "the
Mass isn't independent" (Note Please, The Sun gravity itself follows
this same equation).. in following Table we study this equation in
details..
25. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
25
The Planets Gravities Equation4
1st
Equation
The Planets Gravity=
= (Earth Diameter/ Planet Diameter)2
* (Planet Mass / Earth
Mass)* Earth Gravity
THE PLANETS GRAVITIES TABLE
Planet Equation Resulted Registered Error
The Sun (Earth/Sun diameters rate)2
(Sun
Mass/ Earth Mass)* earth gravity
= (1/109)2
* 333000*9.8= 274
274 274 0
Moon (3.66)2
x (0.073 / 5.97) x 9.8 1.6 m/sec2
1.6 m/sec2
0
Mercury (2.61)2
x (0.23/5.97) x 9.8 3.7 m/sec2
3.7 m/sec2
0
Venus (1.0538)2
x 4.87 /5.97) x 9.8 8.9 m/sec2
8.9 m/sec2
0
Earth 9.8 9.8 9.8 0
Mars (1.878)2
x (0.642 / 5.97) x 9.8 3.7 m/sec2
3.7 m/sec2
0
Jupiter (0.0892)2
x (1898 / 5.97) x 9.8 24.7 m/sec2
23.1 m/sec2
6.9%
Saturn (0.10582)2
x (568/5.97) x 9.8 10.44 m/sec2
9 m/sec2
16%
Neptune (0.2575)2
x (102/ 5.97) x 9.8 11.1 m/sec2
11 m/sec2
0.9%
Pluto (6.97)2
(0.0131 / 5.97) x 9.8 1.04 m/sec2
1.1 m/sec2
5.4%
Note The Big errors caused by using of the squared values i.e. Saturn error
isn't 16% but just 4% and Jupiter error isn't 6.9% but just 2.6% .. etc)
4
I provide in this paper my 5 Basic Planets Equations (written all together in last page
before the planet data sheet at the end of this Paper), these Equations I found them,
and these equations are not found in any physics book for that I call them "GERGES
EQUATIONS", these equations define the planets gravities, Masses, orbital
distances, & orbital inclinations. And also I provide in this paper many other forms
for the Planets relations but these 5 Planets Basic Equations are the Most correct and
accurate equations, where the other forms are found to refer to the planets relations &
Dependency.
26. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
26
The Planets Gravities Table Comments
A- Why the gravity equation is working? If Each Planet Mass is
independent, why such equation can be valid?! This equation tells
us The Mass isn't independent, because of that the rates between
the sizes & masses of one Planet can effect to define other Planets
gravities.
B- This equation proves easily there's a dependency between the
Planets Masses with each other, i.e. the Planets Masses aren't
independent.
C- The Sun itself follows this same gravity equation and that's a
great reference proving that the Mass is Not Independent, but
the Mass is produced by the Planet Motion.
D- Through this equation we may explain why the Saturn has such
small gravity less even than the earth gravity, spite of his mass
around 95 folds the earth mass, where the reason is the
Earth/Saturn circumferences rate, now because this number is
(0.0892) and even we need the squared value which equal
(0.00795664) this number, that caused the Saturn gravity to
decrease so much… and that support the idea the Mass isn't
independent.
27. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
27
2nd
- The Proves That "The Matter (Mass) Is Created By The Motion"
9- The Mass & Experiment. It's very hard to prove the Matter (Mass) is
created by the Motion through the lab experiments, Because our body
itself are Matters (Masses) made of Motions, and we see the Matter
around us as a person looks at himself in Mirror! We need outer
source of knowledge to know this information.. exactly as someone
tries to measure the ship speed in which he travels by the ship tools!!
It's impossible to get it, and he needs to make his measurement related
to the Sea itself.. for that reason I use the solar group planets Data.
10- In following I present the planet Period Equation which proves the
planets are depended on each other to define their orbital Cycles
Periods, this item has 2 parts (A & B) in item B I provide the equation
with its proves & comments, but in A I wish to refer to some deep
contemplation related to our Solar group planets
a. Why the planets should depend on each other to define their
orbital periods, distances…etc? why that's important?
How do we imagine the planets move in their Cycles? How can each
planet move in his rotation trajectory if he's independent from the other
planets ?! There's something wrong in deep. It can't be done! Where they
all rotate around the same Sun, they follow similar trajectories! It will be
something very strange to consider they are independent from each other.
This comment not to provide a proof to support my claim, this comment
talks to the human mind! How can create such Cycles for independent
players?! Even for cars you can't accept for trunks to move in bicycles
roads! It's wrong in basic description!
But if we accept the planets are depended on each other
i.e. The Matter (mass) is NOT independent.
28. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
28
B- The Planets Orbital Periods Equation
2nd
Equation
The Planet orbital Period= The Previous Planet
period * his orbital inclination (or Axial tilt)
Planet His equation Registered Error
Mercury The orbital period 88 (has no previous
planet So Mercury considers the
basic unit)
88 0
Venus Venus Period = 88 *2.6 = 228.8 days days 224.7 (1.8%)
88 Mercury orbital period (The previous planet)
2.6 the Venus axial Tilt complementary (where Venus Axial
Tilt is 177.4 so the complementary = 180-177.4 = 2.6)
Venus follows the Equation perfectly
Earth Earth Period =224.7 * 1.6 = 360.6 360.6 365.2
(error 1%)
224.7 is the Venus orbital period (The previous planet)
1.6 is (2.6)1/2
where 2.6 is the Venus Axial tilt complementary
Earth follows the Equation perfectly
Mars Mars Period = 365.25 x 1.9 = 693.9 693.9 687 (1%)
365.25 the Earth Period (The previous planet)
1.9 Mars orbital inclination
Mars follows the Equation perfectly
Jupiter Jupiter Period = 687 *(1.9)2
*(3.1)1/2
=
4364.9 days
4331 0.7%
Jupiter uses
29. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
29
687 Mars period (The previous planet)
1.9 Mars orbital inclination according to the equation
3.1 Jupiter Axial Tilt
Jupiter follows the Equation perfectly
Saturn Saturn Period
4331 *2.5 = 10827.5days
10747
days
0.7%
4331 Jupiter period
2.5 Saturn orbital inclination
Saturn follows the Equation perfectly
Uranus Uranus Period =
10747 *(97.8/26.7)*0.8 =
10747*2.93=31492
31492.3 30589
(error
2.9%)
10747 Saturn orbital Period
26.7 Saturn Axial Tilt according to the Equation
97.8 Uranus Axial
0.8 Uranus orbital inclination
Neptune Neptune Period =
= 30589* (97.8/(28.3*1.8)) = 58728
days
58728
days
59800
(error
1.7%)
30589 Uranus period according to the equation
97.8 Uranus Axial Tilt according to the Equation
28.3 Neptune Axial Tilt
1.8 Neptune Orbital inclination
Pluto Pluto Period = 59800 *1.8*0.8 =
86112
86112 90588
(error
4.9%)
59800 Neptune Period
1.8 Neptune orbital inclination
0.8 Uranus Orbital inclination
30. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
30
The Planets Orbital Periods Equation Comments
1 -The Equation Factors
This Equation uses the following factors
A-The Previous planet orbital period
B- The orbital inclinations & Axial tilts of the required planet
& his previous.
As a rule when we use any planet Data, the orbital inclination &
Axial Tilt of this Planet become free option to the planet equation
to reach to the convenient value..
1- Why this Equation & Table tells us some Truth?
- The Equation is valid for all the Planets where no any planet
used outer numbers except Pluto used the Uranus orbital
inclination in addition to Neptune orbital inclination, which
proves there's a real rule controls the planets orbital Periods
which no one can create if not found by the Planets Creator
Himself Basically.
- The planet orbital period depending on the previous planet
orbital inclination is a logical idea because each planet
depends & connects with his previous Planet to find his
rotation area, So the previous planet orbital inclination effects
on the planet orbital period & distance as we'll see in Part 1/
chapter 4.
- This equation is easy and clear where shows to us there's a real
Dependency between each planet with his previous Planet that
supports the research claim the planets Deep Dependency on
each other
This Equation is a crucial proof that
"The Planet Matter (Mass) is not independent"
31. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
31
11- In Chapter 6 of Part 1, I Provide the Egyptian Astronomic
Phenomenon 2737, where I proved that this Cycle 2737 depends on
Metonic Cycle, So How the gravitation theory can explain the
effect of the Moon little Mass on Saturn (the very far planet), to
force Saturn to follow the Moon trajectory!!
12- In the following I provide the Mass equation, which can prove
easily that the Mass isn't independent as following:
32. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
32
The Planet Mass Equation
3rd
Equation
The Planet Mass=
= 0.073*1024
kg (moon Mass)* 224.7 (Venus orbital period)* F(x)
(where F(x) is a function in the required Planet/ moon diameters rate with
orbital inclination & Axial Tilt of The required Planet, Venus & Moon)
The Planet Mass Equation Study
First: The Equation Factors
The equation uses basic factors to define the planet Mass, these factors
are the following :
a. The Moon Mass 0.073* 1024
kg
b. The Venus orbital Period 224.7 day
c. The required Planet / Moon diameters rate
d. Orbital inclinations of the three planets (the require Planet,
Venus & Moon) as free options
e. Axial Tilts of the three planets (the require Planet, Venus &
Moon) as free options
Note
- To define any Planet Mass I use the three planets orbital
inclinations & Axial tilts, that because Venus & Moon I use their
Data in the Basic equation, for that reason it's possible to use their
orbital inclinations & Axial tilts additionally because we already
use their data. For the same reason we use the orbital inclination &
Axial Tilt of the required Planet because we try to define his Data.
33. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
33
- I don't create a specific form for the function f(x) because the Mass
(Matter) is created by the Motion according to my Basic
hypothesis, and I proved by many ways that we don't understand
the planets Motions, for that I can't define specific form for the
function f(x). I restricted the function f(x) to use specific values
(Diameters rate as a basic value of f(x) and the orbital inclinations
with the Axial Tilts for the three planets as free options) to reach to
the convenient required planet Mass value, and by such way we
depend on specific Values to define the Masses which may prove
These Masses Aren't Independent, but because we don't
understand the Planet Motion I can't define This Dependency in
any form.
- Here we should remember the question from Mars/ Venus distance,
which was why I didn't create a form to use the Basic Values in the
Planet distance definition based on Mars/ Venus distance. And the
answer is the same, where the planets distances depend on specific
3 values that means the Planet distances Aren't Independent, but
Because we don't understand the Planet Motion I can't define This
Dependency in any form.
34. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
34
Second: Why this equation expresses really about the Planet Mass?!
And Why this equation considers a proof that :
The Mass Is Not Independent?
1. Because all The Solar group Planets used Constant Numbers
(which are 0.073*1024
kg (moon Mass), 224.7 (Venus orbital
period), Venus & Moon Orbital inclinations & Axial tilts, all of
these 6 Values Are Constants). And in addition to these constant
numbers, The required planet uses his own diameter rate,
orbital inclination & Axial Tilt. So 6 Constant numbers and 3
Variables define the Planet Mass which Proves The Mass Is Not
Independent.
2. The previous 6 Values (all the orbital inclination & Axial Tilts) all
of them are free options for the Planet to use any of them to reach
to the Mass convenient value, and I follow this way because the
Mass is depended on the Motion and we don’t understand the
Planet Motion, for that I left the Planet free to reach to his Mass
value in freedom which helps us to reach to the correct value and to
learn us some information about the planet motion
3. By using 6 constants & 3 Variables, that means all Planets Masses
are related together & connected with each other i.e. The Planet
Mass is Not independent.
4. Also When the Planets Masses depend on his own planet orbital
inclination or Axial tilt (his motion variables) regardless the 6
constants, that means The Planet Mass depends on the Motion
i.e. The Mass depends On The Motion And The Mass It's Not
Independent.
5. Also When the Planets Masses depend on the Planet diameter rate
to the moon diameter that means "The planet Mass is Not
independent".
35. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
35
The Solar Group Planets Masses Table Used The Mass Equation
The Planets Masses Equation (Again)
5th
Equation
The Planet Mass=
= 0.073*1024
kg (moon Mass)* 224.7 (Venus orbital period)* F(x)
(where F(x) is a function in the Planet/ moon diameters rate with orbital
inclination & Axial Tilt of The required Planet, Venus & Moon)
The
Planet
The Mass = 0.073 *224.7* F(x) Result Regist
ered
Error
Mercury Mercury Mass =
(0.073*224.7)/ (1.404*7*5.1)= 0.327
0.327 0.330 0.9%
1.404 Mercury/ Moon diameters rate
7 Mercury orbital inclination
5.1 Moon orbital inclination
Venus Venus Mass =
(0.073* 224.7)/3.48 = 4.713
4.713 4.87 3.2%
3.48 (Venus/ moon) diameters rate
Earth Earth Mass= 0.073*3.66*224.7= 60.03 60.03 59.7 0.5%
3.66 (Earth/ moon) diameters rate
Moon 0.073 * 1024
kg
Mars (1.95*224.7*0.073)/1.9*25.2=0.66 0.668 0.642 4%
1.95 (mars/ Moon) diameters rate
1.9 Mars Orbital inclination
25.2 Mars Axial Tilt
Jupiter Jupiter Mass= 1786 1898 5.9%
36. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
36
(0.073*41.14*224.7*3.44)/1.3 = 1786
41.14 Jupiter/ moon diameters rate
3.44 Venus orbital inclination
1.3 Jupiter orbital inclination
Saturn Saturn Mass=
0.073* 34.68* 224.7=568.8
568.85 568 0
34.68 (Saturn/ moon) diameters rate
Uranus Uranus Mass =
(0.073 * 14.71* 224.7)/(0.8*3.44) = 87.6
87.6 86.8 1%
14.71 (Uranus/ moon) diameters rate
0.8 Uranus orbital inclination
3.44 Venus orbital inclination
Neptune Neptune Mass=
(0.073*224.7*14.2*1.8*6.7)/28.3 = 99.24
99.24 102 2.7%
14.2 (Neptune/ moon) diameters rate
1.8 Neptune Orbital inclination
28.3 Neptune Axial Tilt
6.7 Moon Axial Tilt
Pluto Pluto Mass =
(0.687 *0.073*224.7)/(122.5*7) = 0.01351
0.01314 0.0131
4
0%
0.687 (moon/Pluto) diameters rate
7 Mercury orbital inclination
122.5 Pluto Axial tilt.
Note: all planets follow the equation perfectly except Neptune needs Uranus Orbital
inclination to define his Mass & Pluto needs Mercury Orbital inclination to define his
Mass.
37. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
37
Study of Solar Group Planets Masses Table
I should explain that all my 5 Basic planets equations are just methods
to express the Planet Data. So my equations are similar to a
measurement for the average planets data and to see which Planet
follows completely the equation and which Not. My hard work
summarizes in the numbers dealing to make the process very near to
the Planet data itself.
For that, I don't know why one planet uses his orbital inclination
to define his Mass, and why another planet doesn't use!.(I left the
own planet data as the planet free option to produce convenient result-
but the misunderstanding of the planet behavior in his equation found
because of the planet Motion misunderstanding, where the Mass is
created by the Motion), I tried to find suitable format for the planet
Mass depend on the Planet own Data, and I found that during my
dealing with the Planet data numbers
Also there are some additional values available for any planet to use
without limitation, such as the Moon orbital inclination & Axial tilt,
and also Venus orbital inclination & her Axial Tilt .. and that because
these planets data are using as Basics of the Mass Equation, so for
example any planet can use not only the Moon Mass in his equation
but also its orbital inclination degrees…etc this also is considered as
free options for any planet to produce the convenient result.
38. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
38
The main argument here is the following:
1- Because all the Planets used the same constants numbers
(moon mass, inclinations, Venus period.. etc) So the Planets
Masses Are Related To Each Other
2- And where the Planet Mass depend on the own Planet motion
data, that may prove, the Mass isn't independent property
because the Mass depends on the planet motion data which
are changeable according to the Motion (Motion data i.e.
orbital inclination & Axial Tilt)
39. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
39
The Masses Equation Table Comment
Planet Its Mass equation solution
Mercury Mercury Mass
(0.073*224.7)/(1.404 *7*5.1) = 0.327
0.073 Moon mass
1.404 Mercury/ moon sizes
5.1 Moon orbital inclination
Mercury follows the Equation perfectly
Venus Venus Mass = (0.073* 224.7)/3.48 = 4.713 (Error3.2%)
0.073 Moon mass
224.7 Venus orbital Period
3.48 = (Venus / moon sizes
rate)
Venus follows the Equation perfectly
But Venus divides her equation by the Venus / Moon
diameters rate, and the reason may be the Venus regressive
Motion, where this Research Basic hypothesis is the Mass is
created by the Motion, and when the Motion changes, the
Mass equation may change also.
Earth Earth Mass= 0.073*3.66*224.7= 60.03 (Error 0.5%)
0.073 Moon mass
224.7 Venus orbital Period
3.66 Earth / moon sizes rate
Earth follows the equation Perfectly
Mars Mars Mass= (1.9* 224.7*0.073*1.9)/6.7*5.18*2.6 = 0.66
(error 3.5%)
1.9 Mars / moon diameters rate 6.7 Moon Axial Tilt
224.7 Venus orbital period 5.1 Moon orbital inclination
40. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
40
2.6 Venus complementary Axial
Tilt (180-177.4 =2.6)
1.9Mars Orbital inclination
Mars follows the equation Perfectly
Mars uses many factor in his equation all of them are
available by the equation rule, So he used just his own
data, Moon data & Venus data.
Jupiter Jupiter Mass=
(41.14*224.7*0.073*3.44)/1.3 = 1786 (error 5.9%)
41.14 Jupiter/ Moon sizes rate 0.073 * 1024
kg Moon Mass
224.7 days Venus orbital
Period
3.44 Venus orbital
inclination
1.3 Jupiter orbital inclination
The factors are usual, but Jupiter need help from Venus
orbital inclination and that's logical because Venus period is
using as the moon mass. And Jupiter uses his orbital
inclination also (Jupiter follows the equation perfectly)
Saturn Saturn Mass = 0.073* 34.68* 224.7=568.8 (error 0%)
34.68 (Saturn/ moon) sizes
rate
224.7 Venus Orbital Period
0.073 * 1024
kg moon mass
Saturn follows the equation Perfectly
Uranus Uranus Mass =
= (14.71 * 0.073* 224.7)/ 0.8*3.44 = 87.6 (1%)
14.71 Uranus/ moon sizes rate 224.7 Venus period/ 0.073 Moon
Mass
0.8 Uranus Orbital inclination 3.44 Venus Orbital
41. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
41
inclination
Uranus follows the equation perfectly
Just Uranus divided his equation by his orbital inclination
and Venus orbital inclination, and both numbers are used
normally by the equation explained rules.
Neptune Neptune Mass= (14.2 * 0.073*224.7*0.8)/1.8 = 103.5 (1%)
14.2 Neptune/ moon sizes rate 224.7 Venus period/ 0.073
Moon Mass
0.8 Uranus Orbital inclination 1.8 Neptune Orbital
inclination
Neptune follows the equation approximately
Neptune uses the Uranus orbital inclination (the nearest
Planet) and divided by his orbital inclination, all of that
follow the equation normally.
Pluto Pluto Mass = (0.687 *0.073*224.7*)/(122.5*7) = 0.01314
(0%)
0.687 (moon/Pluto) sizes rate 224.7 Venus period/ 0.073
Moon Mass
122.5 Pluto Axial tilt 7 Mercury orbital inclination
Pluto follows the equation approximately
Pluto divided his equation by his orbital inclination and it's
normal, but also by Mercury orbital inclination, because
Mercury is the Master of our group (Starting Basic point), So
Mercury starts the group and closes it, so he used his orbital
inclination with his Mass and with Pluto mass
42. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
42
3rd
-The Proves Of "The Mass Is Created By The Motion" (Continued)
13- The Mass & time (The Matter & Antimatter)
As I argue in this Chapter, the mass is created by the Motion, we know
the Mass (matter) is produced by the light in two forms (electron &
positron) which is called the matter & antimatter. Some people ask
where's the antimatter on the Earth?, because we find just Matter can
continue in existence?
I argue that the time is necessary for the Material Universe Continuous
Existence. The Time Create An Isolator Between The Matter &
Antimatter but both of them are found on the Earth.
We should notice that the positron moves backwardness at the time
dimension, which means The Matter & antimatter are separated from
each other BY THE TIME.
So because the time is found and forms the isolator between the Matter
and Antimatter, the Matter moves in Cycle suffering the continuous
attraction between the positive & negative charges, which can't reach
each other because of the time.
14- The Church learnt us that The Mother of God still Virgin after
She gave birth to Him!! And why this learning is important for
us?!!
The Church told us that the Mass (Matter-body) is made of light (the
motion), and The Lord Himself (as any other human) passed through His
Mother without tearing Her Body, because he passed as a light beam,
which's a human ability needs some training (as the Monks training to be
enable to fly as light beams!! Which are events registered in the history
can't be denied or explained). for that reason The Mother of God still
Virgin after the Birth!!! The Church tried to save the Nature correct
43. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
43
principles in the religion learning to help the science. Very strange the
science considers the Religion is his enemy! while the Religion & ancient
civilizations try to learn us some useful principles5
!
15- How can we explain the astrology strange abilities?
Because the Matter (Mass) is created of the motions (the Universe
Motions) for that the astrology professionals who knows the universe
motions can expect some events will be happen for our material bodies,
because the body material is controlled by the universe motions. (how
these abilities can be explained if the Matter (Mass) is independent?!!).
5
- I'm very surprised that there's no any study dealt "the 2737 Egyptian astronomic
phenomenon"(I present this phenomenon in chapter 1 of Part 2 of this Paper)! I see
that not logical because the phenomenon tells us there were other people understood
perfectly the universe astronomy and they gave us a great gift by building the great
three pyramids as a references to such phenomenon, so why the modern astronomy
doesn't try to compare our knowledge with theirs through encourage the studies and
reports about this 2737 Egyptian astronomic phenomenon.. actually it's illogical to
neglect such very great gift we didn't work for, but even got it without any payments
or efforts, and its data are available to us to compare our knowledge with ancient
knowledge and correct ourselves if it's necessary!!
44. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
44
Chapter 3
The Mass Definition Conclusion
Introduction
After the proves that "the Matter (Mass) is created by the Motions",
we know now that
The Planet Motion Is NOT Caused by the
Gravitational Forces
The Planet is portable by the Motion
Actually that should change our vision to the universe
completely, then I provide here an example for the universe
vision change
That we'll see in following.
Earth Cycle
The Earth has a cycle which is
365 days+ 365 days +365 days +366 days = 1461 days
This is the Earth Cycle which is very known
But we need to realize that the Earth Matter is effected by the
Earth Cycle, that because the Earth Matter is portable by the
Earth Motion.
45. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
45
Let's study one case as example for the change in our universe
vision.
The Earth Great Earthquake
Before December 2012 there were many claims that in December
2012 the Earth will face the greatest Earthquake in human history.
The claims of the greatest Earthquake are found in many sites as the
following
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_phenomenon
http://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/maya-world-end.html
Here I don't evaluate this information if it's correct or incorrect
Here I want to use this information to show how the universe Vision
will change based on the Matter new definition.
We all know that the Earthquake didn’t happen in December 2012,
as it was expected
But I want to apply my new Mass definition on this Case
Let's try
46. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
46
The Earthquake date was mistaken! Why?
The earthquake shouldn't hit the earth in December 2012, that was
mistaken date! And why?
Because we know now that the Earth Matter (Mass) is portable by
the Earth Motion
And because the Earth Matter (Mass) depends on the Earth Motion,
the Earth Mass should be effected by the Earth motion Cycle..
So the Motion Cycle (365.+365+365+366 = 1461 days) isn't just
motion Cycle but also the Earth Matter (Mass) is influenced by this
Cycle..
That means the greatest earthquake – if truth- can't reach to the Earth
Matter in December 2012
But should wait after one complete Cycle (1461days)
So The Correct Date should be after December 2016
As the sun rays sent to the Earth needs 500 seconds to reach to the Earth
That's the same case the Earthquake strong force should reach to the
Earth Matter (Mass) after one complete Cycle (1461 days)
The Conclusion
The Earth Greatest earthquake –if Truth- will hit the
Earth Mass after December 2016..
47. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
47
Chapter 4
The Planets Orbital Distances Equation
4th
Equation
THE PLANET ORBITAL DISTANCE =
= (Plant Diameter /Earth Diameter)* Earth Orbital Distance
1AU * The Orbital Inclination of the Previous Planet.
Introduction:
What we need from the Planets orbital distances study? We need to
prove that the Planets orbital distances are depended on each other.
Or the planet orbital distances depend on any other data which
means the planet distances are not independent.
The Planet Orbit distance equation is one of the very interesting
equations, which proves clearly that the Planets orbital distances are
depended on the Planets diameters & orbital inclination.
So any Planet orbital distance depends on his diameter rate to the
Earth diameter and the orbital inclination of his previous Planet (for
example Venus orbital distance depends on Mercury orbital
inclination- And this idea should be correct because the previous
planet gives the allowable area for the planet rotation)
This Planet Orbit Distance Equation Is A Crucial
Proof That The Planets Are Depended On Each.
48. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
48
The Planet Orbital Distance Table
Now I'll use this equation to define the solar group planets orbital
distances as following.
Planet THE PLANET ORBITAL DISTANCE = (Plant
Diameter /Earth Diameter)* Earth orbital distance
1AU * The orbital inclination of the Previous Planet.
Resulted Registered
Mercury (Mercury Diam/ Earth Diam)* 1AU
=0.38*149.6 = 57.37 M km
57.3 57.9
(error 1%)
Because there's no Previous Planet for Mercury, for that he doesn't use
any orbital inclination to define his orbital distance
Venus (Venus Diam/ Earth Diam) * (Mercury orbital
inclination/9.3) * 1AU =
0.9488* 149.6* 7/9.3 = 106.8
106.8 108.2
(error
1%)
- Venus uses The Mercury orbital inclination according to the equation,
because Mercury is the previous Planet to Venus.
- The Solar group planets are one series connected together, So Venus
needed to divide hers equation by 9.3 to find her orbital distance, and
Neptune needed to multiply his equation by 9.3 to find his orbital
distance!! So there's no change is happened because Venus & Neptune
are connected together and can behave as one number when multiply
it with 9.3 and divide it by 9.3 the result will be no change.
- That's not very surprised, and we will see this operation repeats again
by the same value. that does not weaken the equation, that proves the
planets are connected with each other more deeply than the gravitation
theory suggests
Neptune (Neptune Diam/ Earth Diam)= 3.882 * 1Au *0.8
Uranus orbital inclination * 9.3 = 4483.7
4320.7 4495.1
(error 3.8%)
- Neptune uses Uranus orbital inclination according to the Equation
Neptune uses also the multiplying of 9.3 to balance the Venus division of it,
to define his orbital inclination.
Earth Is our Measure tool to define the distance
Earth orbital distance = 149.6 million km
49. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
49
We should notice that the Earth orbital inclination is Zero, that means Mars
can't depend on the Earth to define his orbital distance because she has no
orbital inclination, Spite Mars very near to the Earth..
For that Mars will depend on Jupiter! Because the Earth has no orbital
inclination..
But this will make some difficulties because Jupiter himself should depend
on Mars to define his orbital distance, and all that will make the situation
some complex.
For that reason, we should not define the Mars distance Now
We should starts again from Uranus (Because Neptune is defined already
connected directly with Venus) to find the continuous series to see how Mars
& Jupiter will solve this problem..
And now we'll start with Uranus
Uranus (Uranus Diam/Earth Diam) *1AU* F(x) =
= 4 * 1AU * 2.5 Saturn orbital inclination * 1.922 =
2875.3 (1.922 transferred to Saturn)
2875.
3
2872.5
(error 0)
- Uranus uses Saturn orbital inclination according to the equation.
- As we know from Venus & Neptune, the solar group is a series
continuous & connected together. For that the numbers transferred
through the solar group from planet to planet without difficulties
because all the planets are created by the Same Motion, and for that
reason the rest Number 1.922 will transferred easily to Saturn where
Saturn may use this number and if that happens Uranus & Saturn will
be partners in this same value which part of it at Uranus and The Other
Part At Saturn.
Saturn (Saturn Diam/ Earth Diam) * 1AU = 9.44 *149.6
= 1413.5
1413.
5
1433.5
(error
1.3%)
- Saturn depends on Jupiter orbital inclination 1.3 according to the Equation.
- But there's a transferred Number (1.922) came from Uranus,
- These both numbers together = 1.3*1.922 =2.517
- But Saturn equation doesn't uses any orbital inclination!
For that reason
50. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
50
This whole Number (2.517) will be transferred into Jupiter
Jupiter (Jupiter Diam/ Earth Diam) * 1AU * F(x)=
= 11.209 x 149.6 x 0.461 = 775.11
775.1
1
778.6
(Error
4/1000)
- Jupiter should depend on Mars orbital inclination according to the equation
But
- There's also a transferred number from Saturn
- So the total is
- 2.517 (transferred from Saturn) * 1.85 Mars orbital inclination = 4.656
- But Jupiter used inclination orbital value = 0.461
- So the rate between both values = 10
- This 10 will be transferred to Pluto
Mars (Mars Diam/ Earth Diam) * 1AU *(1.31/0.461)
= 227 millions km
227 227.9
(error
4/1000)
- Mars was the problem, because the Earth has no orbital inclination,
and so it's difficult to define his orbital distance..
From the Mars Equation we see
- Mars depends on Jupiter and that's the only available solution, shortly
because there's no third planet!
- But when Mars used the Jupiter orbital inclination to define his orbital
distance, he has to use the Value 0.461 which used by the Jupiter himself
It’s important to understand that
Because the relation between Mars & Jupiter is mutual relation both of them
depends on each other to define their orbital distance and for that reason
both of them use the same number.
Pluto (Pluto Diam/ Earth Diam)*1 AU* 10* 17.2*1.3
= 6255.25
6255.
2
5870
(6.5%)
- Pluto uses his orbital inclination because no other planet behind him.
- But Pluto also uses Jupiter orbital inclination, and the reason for that is
the Number 10 which is transferred from Jupiter to Pluto. So if the
transferred No. 10 can reach to Pluto from Jupiter, why Jupiter orbital
inclination himself not reach…
The Planet Orbital Distance Table Comment
51. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
51
1st
:Why the previous equation & table tell us some Truth?
1. The basic equation is used for all the planets, i.e. there's one rule
controls all the planets, how can any one create such Rule if didn't
create by the Planets Creator Himself.
2. The transferred numbers through the Solar group depends on The
Orbital Inclinations of the solar group planets i.e. there are no
outer Numbers, so if the orbital inclinations of the solar group
planets aren't suitable to the equation, these transferred value will
show great disturbances.
3. The Numbers are transferring between the Planets are correct idea
based on assumption that the Planets are depended on each other,
related to each other and suitable for each other..
4. The errors are at average and be acceptable
2nd
: What does tell us this equation?
1. The Using of Previous planet orbital inclination to define the
planet orbital distance is a correct idea because each planet
defines his planet orbital distance based on his previous planet
position i.e. each position Planet defines the next planet position.
That's the reason for which Bode Law discovered some sequences
for the Planets, but because of the Mars problem, this sequence
has some change So the Bode law equation didn't realize it.
2. The Planets are connected, related and depended on each other.
This Equation is a crucial proof that
"The Planet Matter (Mass) isn't independent &
Created by The Motion"
52. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
52
Other forms express the Planet orbital distance relations
Form No.1
We may know that
- Mercury orbital distance = Mercury diameter x (109)2
- Earth orbital distance = Earth diameter x (109)2
- Saturn orbital distance = Saturn diameter x (109)2
Just these three planets follow this equation, and the other solar
group planets don't follow! So if I have no physical reason for these
specific three planets to explain why these 3 planets specifically
follow this equation, I have to give up and consider these numbers as
just "Pure coincidences"…!
But I Have A Physics Reason & Explanation!!
These Three Planets Are Members In The 2737 Cycle
(the 2737 Egyptian astronomic phenomenon occurred when
Mercury, Venus & Saturn aligned on the Egyptian pyramids heads
on 3rd
December 2012 which is a phenomenon repeats once each
2737 years, and on 3rd
December 2012 "the 2737 Cycle" is repeated
for third Time –The phenomenon 2737 in details is found in Part 1/
chapter 6 of this paper)
Now I Have A Physical Reason!
I claim the Mass is created by the Motion, So these 4 planets
(Mercury, Venus, Earth & Saturn) perform one specific Motion
Cycle which is the 2737 Cycle, But the Other Planets don't perform
the 2737 Cycle,
53. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
53
So the Motion of the 2737 Cycle is the cause to create these 4
Planets orbital distances depend on their diameters!! This
conclusion seems logical to our argument,
But this explanation faces a serious obstacle! Because Venus the
fourth member of the Cycle 2737 doesn't follow this equation!!
So the physical reason will be invalid because of that!! NO!!!
Because Venus regresses, we should remember (the Mass is created
by the Motion). And Now Venus changes her Motion regarding to
the other three planets, why she should follow their same equation?!
It's just correct Venus can't follow their equation, and the equation
still valid
This form of relation tells us these four planets follow the same rule
to define their orbital distances Based on their diameters
I.e. The planet orbital distances aren't independent
I.e. The planets are not independent
i.e. The Planet Matter (Mass) isn't independent
54. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
54
I’ll provide here the references of the Cycle 2737
2737 CYCLE REFERENCES
The Planets Mercury, Venus & Saturn aligned the Egyptian
Pyramids heads once each 2737 years
Occurred on 3rd
December 2012
(more details in chapter 1/ part2 of this paper)
I- References for the 2737 phenomenon predicting occurrence
http://alamongordo.com/apocalypse-armageddon/3-planets-balanced-giza-pyramids-december-3-
2012/
http://galacticconnection.com/mercury-saturn-and-venus-aligned-on-dec-3-2012-with-the-pyramids-at-giza
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-y_OAdAAdes
http://galacticconnection.com/mercury-saturn-and-venus-aligned-on-dec-3-2012-with-the-pyramids-at-giza/
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/20/planetary-alignment-pyramid-scheme/
http://astroblogger.blogspot.com.au/2012/08/no-there-will-not-be-planets-aligned.html
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?397336-Planets-Aligned-with-Pyramids-of-Giza-1st-Time-in-2-737-Years-12-3-2012
http://www.stuffwecomeupwit.com/planetary-alignment-that-will-take-place-dec-3-2012-on-top-of-pyramids/
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2067960/pg1
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2068942/pg1
http://blogs.nature.com/houseofwisdom/2012/08/planets-alignment-on-pyramids-image-is-not-very-accurate.html
http://2012thebigpicture.wordpress.com/2012/12/01/significance-of-the-giza-pyramid-planetary-alignment-on-december-3rd-2012/
II- References for the 2737 phenomenon actual occurrence
http://earthsky.org/space/photos-from-friends-december-3-2012-line-up-of-three-planets
http://modernsurvivalblog.com/space/planetary-alignment-with-pyramids-of-giza/
http://sciencespiritzer.fullblog.com/alignment-of-planets-on-the-pyramids-12032012.html
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/12/3-pyramides-of-gizeh-3-dec-2012-star-alignement-confirmed-2507300.html
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/12/3-pyramides-of-gizeh-3-dec-2012-star-alignement-confirmed-2507300.html
http://modernsurvivalblog.com/space/planetary-alignment-with-pyramids-of-giza/
http://forum.gdvplanet.com/topic/369-planets-align-with-giza-pyramids/
http://missiongalacticfreedom.wordpress.com/2012/12/02/december-3-2012-planetary-alignment-with-giza-pyramids-orions-belt/
http://modernsurvivalblog.com/space/planetary-alignment-with-pyramids-of-giza/
http://sciencespiritzer.fullblog.com/alignment-of-planets-on-the-pyramids-12032012.html
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/12/3-pyramides-of-gizeh-3-dec-2012-star-alignement-confirmed-2507300.html
55. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
55
Other forms express the Planet orbital distance relation
Form No. 2
The Planets Orbital Distances & Circumferences
Planet Planet Orbital
distance (d)
1st
circumference =
2Πd = R
2nd
circumference =
2ΠR
Mercury 57.9 364 2288
Venus 108.2 680.1 4275
Earth 149.6 940.3 5908
Mars 227.9 1432.5 9004.2
Ceres 415 2608
Jupiter 778.6 4894 30762
Saturn 1433.5 9010.5 56637.4
Uranus 2872.5 18055.7 113492.9
Neptune 4495.1 28254.9
Pluto 5870 36897.1
From The Previous Table We Find
- Neptune orbital distance = The second circumference of Venus
orbital distance (with error 4.8%)
- Pluto orbital distance = The second circumference of Earth
orbital distance (with error 0.6%)
- Saturn orbital distance = The first circumference of Mars
orbital distance (with no error approximately)
- Uranus orbital distance = The first circumference of Ceres
orbital distance (with error 9.2 %)
56. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
56
Comment On The Table of
(The Planets Orbital Distances & Circumferences)
- Saturn, Uranus, Neptune & Pluto are found at distances equals
the other planets orbital distances circumferences!! Is there a
physical interpretation for this phenomenon or that's just "pure
Coincidences"
- I think There's a physical reason that create some planets
orbital distance equals at other Planets orbital distances
circumferences, but we see this universe wrongly, because of
the gravitational definition of the Mass prevents us to see the
motions harmony creating the Mass and its Cycle distance.
Note:
1- Mercury orbital Circumference = 364 millions km, but this
same number = (Π+1)* 88 (88 is mercury orbital period)!!
2- Jupiter second circumference is 30762 and this number equals
Uranus orbital periods days (error 0.5%)!!
We should not be surprised that the distances can be seen in orbital
periods! It's not coincidence, it's the process by which the Planets produce
the time & space in which we live!
The Earth rotation period (23.9 hours) transfers into Cycle degrees (360
degrees) which will transfer into defined distance (the Earth rotation
distance around her Axis per day as a part of the orbital distance 365.25
days ), but not just that, the Planet Mass found based on the motion by
method which we don’t know, So after the Mass is found the Motions
decrease by the Mass Value, then the New Mass will have gravitational
forces to practice more effect on the general very complex equation by
which the solar day, the space, the chance for life & knowledge learning
are produced!!! (more details about the coincidences and unit meaning
we should discuss in chapter 7 titled Mercury Puzzles).
57. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
57
Chapter 5
The Planets orbital inclination equation
5th
Equation
Planet Orbital inclination =13.18 *(F(x))
Where:
13.18: The Moon Motion degrees daily =(360/27.3days)
F(x) Is A Function Of The Planet & Moon OI & AX
The Planets Orbital inclination table
The Planet Orbital inclination = 13.18*f(x) Result Registere
d
Erro
r
Mercury Mercury orbital Inclination OI. =
13.18*1/92= 1/7
1/1/7= 7
7 7 0
1/92 = Mercury Axial Tilt (0.01= 1/92), Mercury uses his
Axial according to the Equation to define his orbital
inclination.
This equation shows that the Mercury orbital inclination is
1/(equation Value), which means the Mercury equation is
reflective because Moon depends on Mercury and Not
mercury depends on the Moon)
Venus Venus orbital inclination
(13.18)1/2
=3.63
Venus uses the moon degrees according
to The equation
3.63 3.44 5.5%
Note 13.18 /5.18 = 2.54
Where
5.18 the Moon orbital inclination
2.54 (approximately = 2.6) which is Venus Axial Tilt
complementary (180-177.4 = 2.6)
This is another equation used by Venus to define another number
based on the moon motion degrees daily (13.18)
58. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
58
Earth Earth Orbital inclination = zero
Earth Axial Tilt AX= 13.18*1.73=22.8
22.8 23.44 2.7%
1.73 = (5.18)1/3
Where
5.18 is the Moon orbital inclination
Moon Moon orbital inclination = (13.18/2.6) =
5.07
5.07 5.18 2%
2.6 = (6.68)1/2
Moon Axial tilt
Mars Mars AX = 13.18 * 1.9 = 25.04 25.04 25.2 0.6%
1.9 Mars orbital inclination
Mars uses his Axial Tilt according to the equation, easily he finds
his orbital inclination.
Jupiter Jupiter Orbital inclination
= 13.18/ (3.1)2
=1.37
1.37 1.3
Where
3.1 Jupiter is Axial Tilt
Jupiter uses his Axial Tilt according to the Equation.
Saturn Saturn Orbital inclination =
(13.18/26.7)*5.18= 2.51
2.51 2.5 0.3%
26.7 Saturn Axial Tilt
5.18 Moon orbital inclination
Saturn uses his Axial Tilt according to the Equation and easily finds
his orbital inclination.
Uranus Uranus Orbital inclination =
97.8/(13.18*5.18*1.77)
Note/ Uranus regress
0.809 0.8 0
Where
97.8 Uranus Axial Tilt
5.18 Moon Orbital inclination
1.77 Neptune orbital inclination
59. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
59
Uranus uses his Axial Tilt according to the Equation
Uranus uses Moon Orbital inclination
& Uranus uses Neptune orbital inclination
I should explain that I had to use Neptune Number, because I want
no any outer Number to use supporting the equation, but there's no
way to fight here, because Uranus really depends on Neptune orbital
inclination, he gives us this information and prevents us from the
imagination!
So this information confirmed that the planets depends on each
other.
Neptune Neptune Orbital inclination
= (28.3 * 5.18) / (13.18*6.68) = 1.665
Where
28.3 Neptune Axial Tilt
5.18 Moon Orbital inclination
6.68 Moon Axial Tilt
1.665 1.77 5.9%
Neptune uses Just the equation components without any outer Value
to prove the equation is correct.
Pluto (122.5/13.18 ) = (3.047)2
3.047 * 5.18 = 15.78
15.78 17.2 8.2%
122.5 Pluto Axial Tilt
5.18 Moon orbital inclination
Pluto uses Just the equation components without any outer Value to
prove the equation is correct.
60. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
60
The Planet Orbital inclination Table Comments
5th
Equation
Planet Orbital inclination =13.18 *(F(x))
Where:
13.18: The Moon Motion degrees daily =(360/27.3days)
F(x) Is A Function Of The Planet & Moon OI & AX
1. The Equation is Valid for all the Planets, where all the planets
follow the equation perfectly except three cases which are
a. The Earth depends on Mars orbital inclination to define
her Axial Tilt because the Earth orbital inclination is
Zero
b. Uranus depends on Neptune orbital inclination, which is
a proof that the planets depended on each other,
supporting my argument the Mass is created by the
motion.
2. I don't form the way by which planet uses his Axial Tilt with
13.18 (the moon motion degrees daily) to define his orbital
inclination because that depends on the planet motion which
we don't understand yet, and so I left the planet deals his Axial
tilt number to reach to a convenient value where the resulted
equation tells us some data about the planet motion.
61. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
61
3. The Mercury equation appears as a reflective equation because
the moon motion degrees daily depends on mercury inclination
and Not the Mercury depends on the Moon (the Mercury
reflective equation with the moon data are found many times
in different equations to support this fact). .
4. It should be noticed that Venus has 2 equation by which Venus
defines her orbital inclination and her complementary Axial
tilt, in both equation Venus follows the equation rule clearly,
and didn't use any outer number.
5. Uranus & Pluto have reflective equation to define their orbital
inclinations because both of them regresses
62. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
62
Chapter 6
The Egyptian Astronomic Phenomenon 2737
1- INTRODUCTION6
On 3rd
December 2012 aligned 3 planets (Mercury,
Venus and Saturn) on the three Great Pyramids
heads in Egypt, the Phenomenon repeated just once
each 2737 years.
I called this phenomenon
"The 2737 Egyptian Astronomic Phenomenon"
In this paper I present the proof that the 2737 Egyptian Phenomenon
Cycle depends on the Moon Metonic Cycle!
And then in the 3rd
Chapter I'll discuss how the three planets
(Mercury, Venus and Saturn) depend on the Earth- moon orbit in
their motions!
In this introduction I'll refer just to some interests we got by the
2737 Egyptian phenomenon.
Some interests we got by 2737 Egyptian phenomenon:
First we know that the Pyramids builders recognized the
different astronomic cycles, and especially 2737 phenomenon,
for that they built just 3 pyramids at its parallel line.
Second, we know that the Pyramids builders knew the relative
distances between the planets and built the pyramids at their rates!
Third where the 2737 phenomenon repeated on 3rd
December
2012 for the third time, so the Number 8211 years is important
number for human life or at least for the pyramids age.
Fourth, I may claim that the Pyramids builders built the three
Pyramids specifically for the 2737 Egyptian phenomenon.
Note: The Great Pyramid Height is 5776 Egyptian inches = the
distance between the Sun & Pluto (each inch = 1 million kilometer)
6
- In the appendix No 2 I provided many references for this actual event, with some videos
63. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
63
1ST
SECTION
Why the Lunar year doesn't correspond with the sidereal year at any
cycle?7
We know that the moon turns with the Earth around the sun, so why the
lunar year which equals 354.36 days (lunar Synodic period 29.53 days x
12 months) doesn't correspond to the Sidereal year that equals 365.25
days at any cycle?
We see the 32 Sidereal year a cycle = 11688 days
But the Lunar year cycle =33 years - 5.81 days =11693.88-5.8= 11688
And why there's this addition 5.81 days to prevent both periods to meet
each other
We know that the plane of lunar orbit regresses 19 degrees each year that
causes the eclipse to come early 19 days each year8
So that said the movement of 19 degrees causes change for 19 days
And now we see the lunar year come early 5.81 days, and the lunar plane
has inclination to ecliptic equal approximately 5.14 degrees…
Can I suppose that this difference between Sidereal Cycle 11688 days and
Lunar Cycle 11693.88 days which equals 5.8 days caused by the lunar
plane inclination 5.14 degrees (later we will discuss How?) When we
divided this inclination value 5.14 degrees (or the period 5.8 days) at 360
we find that,
The Lunar orbital inclination causes the lunar Synodic day to come early
approximately 21 minutes daily..
That lead to the following results
- The correct Synodic month is 29.515
- The correct Synodic year is 354.1818 days And by such
way
The lunar cycle which contain 33 Synodic year = 11687.999days
The Sidereal Cycles which contain 32 sidereal year = 11688 days
Where both come to end in the same day
And So the cycle of 32 sidereal years equals 33 modified Lunar Synodic
years (modified lunar year = 354.1818 days) perfectly
7
- the day defines here approximately 86164 seconds where the sidereal year is
365.25 days.
8
- Total Solar Eclipses and how to Observe them- Martin Mobberley- page. 11
64. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
64
2ND
SECTION
The Basic Lunar Year 360 Days
Now I modified the lunar year already from 354.36 to be
354.1818 days
But there's another year related to the moon,
In this year we should added the modified year 354.1818 to the
difference of days caused by the lunar orbital inclination which was
5.8 days approximately
So 5.8+ 354.1818 = 360 days approximately
That's the ancient biblical year And I'll call it
The Basic Lunar Year
Now we have three types of years
- The Basic Lunar Year =360 days
- The modified lunar Synodic year =354.1818 days
- The Sidereal year = 365.25 days
And we'll see how the Metonic Cycle effect on each of them
65. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
65
3RD
SECTION
The 2737 Egyptian Astronomic Phenomenon depends on
Metonic Cycle
The Metonic Cycle defines as a moon Cycle continues for 19
Sidereal Orbit year which equals 6939.75 days, and Metonic Cycle
made because the Lunar orbit plane regresses yearly 19 degrees that
causes the eclipses to come early 19 days yearly.
The Following Table shows How The Metonic Cycle Effect On
The Different Years
Metonic
Cycle
Number
Sidereal
years No.
(365.25
days)
Number of modified Lunar year (equals
354.1818 days)
The Basic lunar Year Numbers
(360 days)
For each Metonic CycleLunar years
in each
Metonic cycle
The Lunar years
(354.1818days) Numbers
For each Metonic Cycle
M. Cycle 1 19 S.
Year
19 19 Lunar Y. + 210.295 days 19 BLY (Basic Lunar Year) +
99.75d(days)
M. Cycle 2 38 S. Y 20 38 L. Y. +420.59d =
39 L. Y + 66.408 d
38 BLY+ 199.5 d
M. Cycle 3 57 S. Y 19 58 L. Y + 276.703 d 57 BLY+ 299.25d
M. Cycle 4 76 S. Y 20 77 L. Y +486.998 d =
78 L. Y +132.8162 d
76 BLY+399d =
77 BLY+39 days
M. Cycle 5 95 S. Y 19 97 L. Y + 343.111d 96 BLY+138.75d
M. Cycle 6 114 S. Y 20 116 L.Y +553.406d =
117 L. Y + 199.224d
115 BLY+ 238.5d
M. Cycle 7 133 S. Y 20 136 L. Y +409.519d=
137 L. Y +55.3374d
134BLY+ 338.25d
M. Cycle 8 152 S. Y 19 156 L. Y +265.6324d 153 BLY+438d= 154
BLY+78days
M. Cycle 9 171 S. Y 20 175 L. Y +475.9274d=
176 L. Y + 121.745d
173 BLY+ 17.75d
M. Cycle 10 190 S. Y 19 195 L. Y+ 332.0406d 192 BLY+ 277.5d
M. Cycle 11 209 S. Y 20 214L.Y +542.3356d=
215 L. Y +188.1538d
211 BLY+ 37.25d = 212 BLY+
17.25d
M. Cycle 12 228 S. Y 20 234 L. Y +398.4488d=
235 L. Y +44.267d
231 BLY+117d
M. Cycle 13 247 S. Y 19 254 L. Y +254.652d 250BLY+ 216.75d
M. Cycle 14 266 S. Y 20 273 L. Y +464.857d=
274 L. Y + 110.675d
269 BLY+216.5d
M. Cycle 15 285 S. Y 19 293 L. Y +320.9702d 288 BLY+416.25d= 289
BLY+56.25d
M. Cycle 16 304 S. Y 20 321L.Y +531.2653d=
313 L. Y +17.0834d
308 BLY+156d
M. Cycle 17 323 S. Y 20 332 L. Y +387.378d=
333 L. Y + 33.1966d
327 BLY+255.75d
M. Cycle 18 342 S. Y 19 352L.Y+ 243.4916d 346 BLY+ 355.5d
M. Cycle 19 361 S. Y 20 371L.Y +453.7866d=
372 L. Y + 99.60486d
365 BLY+455.25d=
366 BLY+ 95.25d
66. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
66
M. Cycle 20 380 S. Y 19 391 L. Y + 309.8992d 385 BLY+195d
M. Cycle 21 399 S. Y 20 410 L. Y + 520.1948d=
411 L. Y +166.013d
404 BLY+294.75 d
M. Cycle 22 418 S. Y 20 430 L. Y +376.308d
431 L. Y +22.12626d
423 BLY+394.5d=
424 BLY+ 34.25d
M. Cycle 23 437 S. Y 19 450 L. Y + 232.4212d 443 BLY+ 134.25d
M. Cycle 24 456 S. Y 20 469 L. Y +442.7162d=
470 L. Y + 88.5344d
462 BLY+ 234d
M. Cycle 25 475 S. Y 19 489 L. Y +298.829d 481 BLY+ 333.75d
M. Cycle 26 494 S. 20 508 L. Y + 509.1244d=
509 L. Y + 154.9426d
500 BLY+433.5d=
501 BLY+ 73.5d
M. Cycle 27 513 S. Y 20 528 L. Y +365.2376d=
529 L. Y +11.0558d
520 BLY+173.25d
M. Cycle 28 532 S. Y 19 548 L. Y +221.3508d 539 BLY+273d
M. Cycle 29 551 S. Y 20 567 L. Y +431.6458d=
568 L. Y + 77.464d
558 BLY+ 372.75d=
559 BLY+ 12.5d
M. Cycle 30 570 S. Y 19 587 L. Y + 287.759d 578 BLY+ 112.5d
M. Cycle 31 589 S. Y 20 606 L. Y + 498.054d=
607 L. Y + 143.8722d
597 BLY+ 212.25d
M. Cycle 32 608 S. Y 20 626 L. Y + 354.1872=627
L. Y
616 BLY+ 312d
M. Cycle 33 627 S. Y 19 646 L. Y + 210.295 635 BLY+ 441.75d =
636BLY+51.75d
M. Cycle 34 646 S. Y 20 665 L. Y + 420.5754d=
666 L. Y + 66.3936d
655 BLY+151.5d
M. Cycle 35 665 S. Y 19 685 L. Y + 276.6886d 674 BLY+ 251.25 d
M. Cycle 36 684 S. Y 20 704 L. Y +486.9836d=
705 L. Y ++132.801d
693 BLY+ 351 d
M. Cycle 37 703 S. Y 19 724 L. Y + 343.096d 712 BLY+ 450.75d
=713BLY+90.75d
M. Cycle 38 722 S. Y 20 743 L. Y + 553.391d=
744 L. Y + 199.2092d
732 BLY+190.5d
M. Cycle 39 741 S. Y 20 763 L. Y +409.5042d=
764 L. Y + 55.3224d
751BLY+289.5d
M. Cycle 40 760 S. Y 19 783 L.Y + 265.6174d= 770BLY+389d=
771 BLY +29 days
67. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
gfrancis@yandex.ru gergesfrancis@yandex.ru +201022532292
67
The Previous Table Study classified into 2 parts
First Part : The study of the column of the modified lunar year
(which equals 354.1818days)
1- Each 32 Metonic Cycles the last day of modified lunar year
(equals 354.1818 days) corresponds with the last day of
Metonic cycle which is the Sidereal Year last day where the
lunar modified years equal 627 lunar years that equals 608
sidereal years perfectly.
2- The difference days between the Modified lunar year with the
Metonic Cycle moves in Cycle and decreases as following
(66.4- 55.33- 44.26- 33.19- 22.126- 11.0558 – 0.00 days) at 98
years interval (98 modified Lunar years – which equals
354.1818 days)
3- The modified Lunar years number for each Metonic Cycle
shown in the table, and I found the following Modified Lunar
Year order "19-20-19-20-19-20" repeats once with each Cycle
consist of 627 modified Lunar year
a. That means with the last day of the Metonic Cycle No.
32 which equals 608 Sidereal Years but equals 627
Modified lunar year. after this Cycle ends, and starts the
new one the modified lunar year order 19-20-19-20-19-
20 will repeat once again as a mark for the new Cycle
starting (this order in table marks by Gray color)
b. We can call the Metonic Cycle no. 32 a Cycle for the
modified Lunar year with the Metonic Cycle (this Cycle
in Table remarked by Yellow)