Research Summary
I- Research Main Questions
1- How Planet Diameter Is Created? (= How The Matter Is Created?)
2- How Planet orbital distance is defined (= What's The Space?)
3- Is There A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
(i.e. Does Space effect on Matter Creation Process?)
II- Research Methodology
I use the planets data analysis to discover the concepts on which they are created?
(I use NASA Planetary Fact Sheet as the only source for Planets Data)
III- Research Hypothesis
(A) Research Primary Hypothesis (have no proves)
- The Matter is created of Energy (E=mc2 supports this idea)
- The Space is Energy (my Hypothesis)
(B) Research Main Hypothesis (have proves)
1- The Solar Group is One Building And Each Planet is A Part Of It
2- There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group
3- Mars Orbital Distance is Changed Through Solar Group History
A summary of my research part 2- (matter creation discussion)Gerges francis
A Summary Of My Research -Part 2- (Matter Creation Discussion)
Abstract
We complete our discussion in the previous paper
A Summary Of My Research
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planet Matter is Created Based On The Following Features:
A- Planet Matter Can't Be Created by Any Random process
B- Planet Matter Can't Be Created Independently From Other Planets Matters
(Planet Diameter and Mass supports this claim)
C- There's a direct relationship between planet diameter and orbital distance
No Random Process Causes The Solar Group Creation (No Big Bang) Gerges francis
The Main Conclusion
The solar group can't be created by any random process.
i.e.
The Big Bang Concept is Unreal
The previous conclusion is produced easily and clearly through the solar planets data analysis..
That means…
The Big Bang Theory contradicts strongly and clearly with the solar planets data analysis and their geometrical meanings which supports the claim that, the big bang concept is Unreal one.
This paper tries to show and prove this contradiction and to show that the solar planets data analysis is the best way to understand the solar group origin and motion which necessitates to review many other theories concern the solar group origin an motion.
Observation vs data analysis as astrophysics research methodGerges francis
The document discusses using planet data analysis as an astrophysics research method rather than relying solely on observational results. It argues that observational results without data analysis can lead to imaginary concepts. It provides examples showing relationships between various planetary properties like diameters, radii, and orbital distances. The document suggests the solar system should be viewed as one interconnected machine rather than independent planets, and questions concepts like the randomness of planetary formation and definitions of units like distance.
The document presents a hypothesis that the solar system is one geometrical structure, with each planet playing a role. It provides equations and data showing relationships between planetary diameters, distances, radii, and circumferences that suggest their dimensions were created based on geometrical reasons and as parts of a single system, rather than randomly. The author aims to analyze planetary data to understand how it was determined and prove the solar system is a designed, integrated whole rather than the result of chance processes.
Kepler 3rd law explanation (a claim against nobel prize board decision in ph...Gerges francis
A claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision – in Physics -2018
Best Greetings
I send this paper as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board - for their decision - for Nobel Prize in physics 2018
Of course I have nothing against the great people who receive the Nobel Prize in Physics 2018 and I congratulate them for their great works
But at my side, I found there's a serious question here
Because I explained frequently in my research that, there's a serious contradiction in physics current theories and we can't understand the solar group geometry if no one solves this contradiction…
I Provided many hard arguments to prove this claim and thought that, the Nobel Prize Board will support me to solve this contradiction in physics.
But I found the Board decision avoids my work!
For that reason I summarized the main idea in this paper and send it as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board
And I wish the board will accept to give me a chance to explain and defend my point of view..
With the Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers
http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
In this paper we compare between the physics current theories which try to explain the solar system motions and the planets real data – this is a known process in physics
Example No. 1
Lorentz Length Contraction Phenomenon tells that- a particle with length L0 will be contracted to L1 when this particle travels with high velocity motion.
¬¬¬
So the question is – Why the particle length is contracted with high velocity motion?
Some physics books tell that, this contraction is just illusion of measurements!
That means, Lorentz Transformations measure illusions and not facts!
We refused that,
But if the particle own length contracted by high velocity motion –that will make the particle properties as a function of its motion – means –Particle mass is created by this particle motion
Newton told us a planet moves basically by masses gravity with the sun - so what's first and what's the second? what's the reason and what's the result
The mass causes the motion (Newton) or the motion defines the mass (Lorentz)?
Similar to this argument we will discuss how to discover the solar system.
Paper Objective
The paper tries to show that Jupiter Data can't be explained by the solar system current theories.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion) Gerges francis
The document discusses the geometry of the solar system. It provides data on planetary properties and proposes that:
1) The solar system is a single trajectory of energy, with each planet representing a point on that trajectory.
2) All planetary data, such as diameters, masses, and orbital distances, are created relative to each other based on a single underlying equation.
3) Jupiter plays a central role, with its diameter determining the total diameter of all planets and its energy owning the main energy of the solar system. Equations are presented showing relationships between Jupiter and Saturn.
The moon indeed moves by gravity (iii) (explanation)Gerges francis
Paper hypotheses
- Light Motion For 1 Second causes Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day (my research 5th hypothesis)
- Planet Matter is created as a result of Planet motion
- Solar system matters are created by planet motion for 2 Solar Days
- Saturn orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 1 solar day ("The Train Motion Concept")
- Uranus orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 2 Solar Days
- That explains the theoretical reason behind Uranus and Saturn strong relationship
A summary of my research part 2- (matter creation discussion)Gerges francis
A Summary Of My Research -Part 2- (Matter Creation Discussion)
Abstract
We complete our discussion in the previous paper
A Summary Of My Research
Paper Hypothesis
Solar Planet Matter is Created Based On The Following Features:
A- Planet Matter Can't Be Created by Any Random process
B- Planet Matter Can't Be Created Independently From Other Planets Matters
(Planet Diameter and Mass supports this claim)
C- There's a direct relationship between planet diameter and orbital distance
No Random Process Causes The Solar Group Creation (No Big Bang) Gerges francis
The Main Conclusion
The solar group can't be created by any random process.
i.e.
The Big Bang Concept is Unreal
The previous conclusion is produced easily and clearly through the solar planets data analysis..
That means…
The Big Bang Theory contradicts strongly and clearly with the solar planets data analysis and their geometrical meanings which supports the claim that, the big bang concept is Unreal one.
This paper tries to show and prove this contradiction and to show that the solar planets data analysis is the best way to understand the solar group origin and motion which necessitates to review many other theories concern the solar group origin an motion.
Observation vs data analysis as astrophysics research methodGerges francis
The document discusses using planet data analysis as an astrophysics research method rather than relying solely on observational results. It argues that observational results without data analysis can lead to imaginary concepts. It provides examples showing relationships between various planetary properties like diameters, radii, and orbital distances. The document suggests the solar system should be viewed as one interconnected machine rather than independent planets, and questions concepts like the randomness of planetary formation and definitions of units like distance.
The document presents a hypothesis that the solar system is one geometrical structure, with each planet playing a role. It provides equations and data showing relationships between planetary diameters, distances, radii, and circumferences that suggest their dimensions were created based on geometrical reasons and as parts of a single system, rather than randomly. The author aims to analyze planetary data to understand how it was determined and prove the solar system is a designed, integrated whole rather than the result of chance processes.
Kepler 3rd law explanation (a claim against nobel prize board decision in ph...Gerges francis
A claim against Nobel Prize Board Decision – in Physics -2018
Best Greetings
I send this paper as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board - for their decision - for Nobel Prize in physics 2018
Of course I have nothing against the great people who receive the Nobel Prize in Physics 2018 and I congratulate them for their great works
But at my side, I found there's a serious question here
Because I explained frequently in my research that, there's a serious contradiction in physics current theories and we can't understand the solar group geometry if no one solves this contradiction…
I Provided many hard arguments to prove this claim and thought that, the Nobel Prize Board will support me to solve this contradiction in physics.
But I found the Board decision avoids my work!
For that reason I summarized the main idea in this paper and send it as a claim to the Nobel Prize Decision Board
And I wish the board will accept to give me a chance to explain and defend my point of view..
With the Best Regards
Gerges Francis Tawdrous
TEL +201022532292
E-mail georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers
http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
In this paper we compare between the physics current theories which try to explain the solar system motions and the planets real data – this is a known process in physics
Example No. 1
Lorentz Length Contraction Phenomenon tells that- a particle with length L0 will be contracted to L1 when this particle travels with high velocity motion.
¬¬¬
So the question is – Why the particle length is contracted with high velocity motion?
Some physics books tell that, this contraction is just illusion of measurements!
That means, Lorentz Transformations measure illusions and not facts!
We refused that,
But if the particle own length contracted by high velocity motion –that will make the particle properties as a function of its motion – means –Particle mass is created by this particle motion
Newton told us a planet moves basically by masses gravity with the sun - so what's first and what's the second? what's the reason and what's the result
The mass causes the motion (Newton) or the motion defines the mass (Lorentz)?
Similar to this argument we will discuss how to discover the solar system.
Paper Objective
The paper tries to show that Jupiter Data can't be explained by the solar system current theories.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Solar System Geometry (Summarized Discussion) Gerges francis
The document discusses the geometry of the solar system. It provides data on planetary properties and proposes that:
1) The solar system is a single trajectory of energy, with each planet representing a point on that trajectory.
2) All planetary data, such as diameters, masses, and orbital distances, are created relative to each other based on a single underlying equation.
3) Jupiter plays a central role, with its diameter determining the total diameter of all planets and its energy owning the main energy of the solar system. Equations are presented showing relationships between Jupiter and Saturn.
The moon indeed moves by gravity (iii) (explanation)Gerges francis
Paper hypotheses
- Light Motion For 1 Second causes Planet Motion For 1 Solar Day (my research 5th hypothesis)
- Planet Matter is created as a result of Planet motion
- Solar system matters are created by planet motion for 2 Solar Days
- Saturn orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 1 solar day ("The Train Motion Concept")
- Uranus orbital distance is the required distance to be passed by the solar system unified motion during 2 Solar Days
- That explains the theoretical reason behind Uranus and Saturn strong relationship
A Solar Group Suggested Description:
1- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same building- i.e. Each Planet is created to be a complementary to the other planets and No solar planet is created or move independently
2- The solar group can be similar to one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same trajectory.
3- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body.
4- Also, The solar group can be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine works as one group.. that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2) – but How The Space Is Created? I suppose that the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy..
Can that be possible?
The Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for the same content….
So it's possible to create matter and space of the same energy…
I have another example to support that…
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright and dark fringes –regardless the theoretical explanation – the experiment tells "when one input is used(light)– outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance – so this same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and their orbital distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data depending on each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances are created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the planets data analysis show the solar planets dependency.
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?Gerges francis
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?
Best regards
When I have discovered that..
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
I have asked Why? But the usual answer was ……
It's Pure coincidence….!
Later I have discovered more equalities….As the following:
1. Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference = Pluto Eccentricity distance = Saturn Uranus Distance = 1433.5 million km
2. Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Pluto Distance = 1375 million km
3. Saturn Pluto Distance = Mercury Neptune Distance = 4436.5 million km
Then I have asked again… why These Distances Are Equal? Is there a geometrical reason behind?…but the usual answer always be …. " Pure Coincidences"
The question wasn't so simple and the answer was mentioned…. I ask clearly… are the solar planets members in the same body? or parts in the same building?- shortly are the solar group as the human hand and the fingers are similar to the planets? means the planets are created and moving depending on each other because all of them consist one machine –one body –one building – one geometrical structure – means the planets aren't separated from each other– but connected with each other.
(that means the space between the planets is a method to connect each planet with others and not to separate each planet from the others)…. This is my question aim!
And the current theory understood that clearly…
And told also a clear answer … that
Any solar planet is separated from the others - each planet is found and move independently..
So the two visions are clear before our eyes ……And the fighting is clear also….
The Solar Group Classical Vision: tells us that… the planet is created independently and move by gravity with the sun without effect of the other solar planets….
My Suggested Vision Is:
The Solar Group is one body – one machine – one building – one geometrical structure – No Planet can be found or move independently from the other planets …. Even the sun herself can't be found without the solar planets… we deal here with one machine – one geometrical structure- so if this geometrical structure has many elements we should be wise enough to see that these elements are members in the same geometrical structure and this structure is found by the cooperation and integration of his members…..
We should fight to prove that we are correct and the current theory is mistaken… Please read the argument…
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Total Solar Eclipse Phenomena proves the following claim.
- The Solar group is one Trajectory of Energy and Each Planet is a point on it
- The Solar group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in this same machine
- The solar group can be similar to one body and each planet is a member in this same body (where the same energy creates all solar planets and their orbital distances, similar to the blood which causes to create all body members)
- Also the solar group is a similar to a great river has many canals where these canals create soils on their banks (the soils are similar to the planets and the canals are similar to the orbital distances)
- The solar planets motions are done in cooperation with each other to perform one job where each planet motion does one task in this same great job
Clearly
The total solar eclipse is done because of a geometrical reason which creates the planets diameters (and even the sun diameter) in geometrical relationships with their distances to enable the total solar eclipse to be occurred
Shortly
No one Solar Planet can be found or move independent from the other planets (even the sun can't be found without the solar planets)
This paper tried to answer the questions:
-Why Jupiter orbital circumference = The Inner Planets Orbital Circumferences Total + Saturn Orbital Distance?
-Why Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days?
-Why Mercury Pluto Distance = 5848.2 mkm?
Paper Conclusions
-There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec in the solar system
-Jupiter Data Shows The Solar System Energy Distribution
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravityGerges francis
The Sun Obliquity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun obliquity on ecliptic (7.25 degrees) proves that, Earth Is Found Before The Sun Creation.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The paper hypothesis tries to disprove Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- While Newton told us, The Sun Is The Planet Motion Reason, the paper hypothesis tells, Earth is found and moving before the sun creation. as a result, we conclude that, Earth Motion Doesn't Depend On The Sun.
- This conclusion be valid for all solar planets. Means, Newton Theory of The sun mass Gravity is mistaken.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Earth moves with light velocity relative to the sun (i)Georgy Tawdrous
The Earth moves with C velocity (light velocity) relative to the Sun
i.e.
The light is produced by The Earth Motion, where
The Earth transforms her motion mechanical waves into light waves, producing the light beams
These light beams travel to the sun and reflect on her where the sun is just a mirror.
The Earth Motion = The Solar Planets Daily Velocities Total based on new time rate defined by the Earth.
Abstract
- The Solar Planets motions are relativistic motions
- Earth real Velocity = 0.99 c
- The time is an Energy
- Based on Relativistic Motions, the distances values can be seen as time values
i.e.
- The time is equivalent for the distance
(a development for the Special Theory of Relativity made by me)
- The Solar group geometrical structure depends on the time and Distance equivalence (based on relativistic motions), to create different rates of time, which enables the system to accumulate the Energy
Let's summarize this idea in following:
- Based on the solar group relativistic motions, time and distances values are equivalence
- The solar geometry uses unified distances to create different values of time, which are seen by different cycles
- The time different values depend on each other to create different rates of time
- By this different rates of time the Energy can be accumulated to produce huge energy from average one.
- Based on this description, the solar planets motions produce the sun light beams
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
The Moon Orbit Analysis
Earth Moon motion has specific 4 points which are:
1. Perigee Point (R1) : Radius 363000 km from Earth (the nearest point)
2. Total Solar Eclipse (R2) : Radius 377000 km from Earth
3. Average Moon Orbit (R3) : Radius 384000 km (registered)
4. Apogee Point (R4) : Radius 406000 km from Earth (the most far point)
These 4 points are defined by 4 geometrical rules which are:
- (1st Rule) Pythagoras rule : R2n + (86000km)2= R2n+1
(why 86000 km? we'll discuss that in this paper)
- (2nd Rule) Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn= (1/Rn+1)
- (3rd Rule) (Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn+1/ Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn) =1.0725
- (4th Rule) The Rate 365.25
This paper tries to prove this fact, and discusses more deep question… why the moon orbital different radiuses are defined by these 4 geometrical rules?
Mars Migration Theory Supports The Conclusion That "Saturn Must Be Created After The Earth Moon Creation"
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second) and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Arguments
- The paper provides 2 basic arguments
- (1st Argument)
- The Paper disproves Newton Theory of The sun mass gravity and proves that the solar planets motions can't be independent motions from one another but each planet motion depends on other planets motions.
- This discussion concludes that, the solar system distances be created in a network form, integrated together in one geometrical design.
- The argument conclusion is (The solar planet move one unified general motion)
- The 1st Argument Depends On (Jupiter Motion Analysis)
- (2nd Argument)
- The Paper claims that the solar planets motions be accompanying with a light beam motion which provides the required energy for the planets and their distances creation (because matter is created of energy and space is created of energy)
- The light motion accompanying with the solar planets motions cause the planets to move one unified general motion.
- The 2nd Argument Depends On (Mercury Motion Analysis)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions rates of time be defined by using ONE RULE
- Based on the planets motions rates of time, the planets orbital periods and distances be defined. means,
- Based on this One Rule, the solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined.
- If the solar planets motions be independent from one another, how their orbital periods and distances be defined based on one rule only?
- The paper provides a proof that, the planets motions use different rates of time which proves that, the solar planets move one unified general motion. means,
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another and created one unified general motion, because of that, the planets motions need to use different rates of time to enable their motions to be integrated into one unified general motion.
- This fact changes the solar system description inherited from Newton theory of the sun mass gravity. The solar planets be similar to carriages in one train move together one unified motion. also the solar group can be similar to a mechanical clock, and the planets be similar to the gears of this clock. Each gear does one motion (and creates one rate of time) and these motions be integrated into one unified gnarl motion (and the rates of time be integrated into one unified general rate of time)
Paper objectives
- The paper provides the rule based on which all solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined, and test all planets motions data to prove that, no planet motion contradicts this rule.
- The paper tries to answer the question (why the solar planets use different rates of time) by providing The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory.
- The paper is divided into 2 parts.
- (1st Part) Provides the rule and its proves discussion
- (2nd Part) Provides The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (III)Gerges francis
The document discusses relativistic effects in the solar system motions. It hypothesizes that matter is created from light beams, so light motion features should be found in planetary motions. The document lists several light motion features that have been discovered in planetary data, including relativistic effects. It suggests relativistic light motion is hidden behind geometrical rules governing planetary motions.
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System? Gerges francis
This document discusses whether Saturn was the last planet created in the solar system. It presents several pieces of data showing relationships between Saturn's orbital characteristics and those of other planets like Mars, Venus, and Earth. The author argues this shows Saturn's data was dependent on and came after the other planets, indicating Saturn was created last. The document's main conclusions are that Saturn was the last planet created and that the solar system planets were created relative to each other, with their data dependent on one another.
Uranus and Neptune orbit perpendicular to the plane of the other planets. The document provides equations showing relationships between planetary orbital distances, periods, and axial tilts intended to support this. In particular, it argues Uranus' unusually high axial tilt of 97.8 degrees results from relativistic effects and relationships to the moon's orbit via the Metonic cycle.
The observer effect on the observation results (space = energy=mc2)Gerges francis
1) The document discusses the observer effect on observation results and proposes that human mind and thinking can influence matter creation and the geometrical structure of the solar system.
2) It provides several examples of relationships between planetary properties like diameters and orbital distances that seem too coincidental to be pure chance.
3) The author's theory is that the human mind realization process can affect our vision of the solar system, and that the solar system's structure is an interactive process involving both its geometrical components and the human mind.
The Moon Geometry
The Moon Data Analysis shows the following:
1- Earth-Moon is an unique planet in the solar group and not similar to any other moon in the group.
2- The Solar Planets are connected together geometrically
i.e.
3- The solar planets are created to be complementary to each other, all of them together consist one geometrical structure (as a triangle, square, or pyramid….)
That means
a. There was an original energy before any matter existence. And from this energy the planet matter is created (based on E=mc2) and the planet orbital distance is created (I suppose the space = Energy). This same energy also causes the planet motion as part of the general geometrical structure.
b. Each solar planet is a part of this same geometrical structure and has a specific job in it (that means no part is absent..! means the original energy created all required planets to form the required geometrical structure)
c. Each Planet Data is created to be suitable for the planet job in the general geometrical structure..
Direction Of Energy Through The Solar Group Gerges francis
- The Solar Group Main Energy is sent from Jupiter to Pluto – This energy sending is continued for 2 sequence solar days
- Neptune used Jupiter Sent Energy consuming 16% of this total energy and the rest of Energy Neptune reflected it toward the inner planets into 2 Energy Trajectories.
o 1st Trajectory is sent to Earth (will be discussed Point No.4)
o 2nd Trajectory is sent to Mercury
- The 1st Trajectory of Energy is reached to Earth (with 86400mkm) – Where Earth reflected this energy into 2 new parts
o Part 1 the energy is sent from Earth to Venus
o Part 2 the energy is sent from Earth to (Jupiter & Uranus)
- The total energy (90000mkm) proves that all energy gathered together on one point only and no contradiction is found…
This explanation shows that the energy passes in cycle through the solar group
The previous idea supports my claim:
- The Solar Group is One Trajectory Of Energy and each planet is appoint on this same energy trajectory….. or
- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same geometrical structure (building)- i.e. Each planet data is created to be suitable for the required task of this planet in the whole building …..and
- No solar planet can be found or move independently
a. Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body. All solar planets and their orbital distances are created by the same energy (by the same blood all body members are created)
b. Or, The solar group be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine job depends on the gears different tasks.. and that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
My Research Hypotheses
Abstract
During 2013-2019 I have studied the solar system geometry. Based on this study I have formed the following 5 basic hypotheses:
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Hypothesis No.2
Solar System moves as a train. i.e. A train moves with all its carriages together, similar to that – Solar Planets move together as one train in one unified motion (i.e. No Planet moves individually or independently from other planets motions)
Hypothesis No.3
Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on energy of light motion for 1 second period – that means – Planet moves following light motion – i.e. – Planet motion shows double motions – (1st) Light Motion (2nd) Its Follower Planet Motion
Hypothesis No.4
Solar System Unified Motion depends On Solar Day Period
Hypothesis No.5
Matter Creation process depends on solar day period of time – that means – Matter creation process depends on the time as one of its main components
In this paper I try to explain these 5 hypotheses and provide short proves for them
A Solar Group Suggested Description:
1- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same building- i.e. Each Planet is created to be a complementary to the other planets and No solar planet is created or move independently
2- The solar group can be similar to one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this same trajectory.
3- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body.
4- Also, The solar group can be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine works as one group.. that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2) – but How The Space Is Created? I suppose that the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy..
Can that be possible?
The Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for the same content….
So it's possible to create matter and space of the same energy…
I have another example to support that…
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright and dark fringes –regardless the theoretical explanation – the experiment tells "when one input is used(light)– outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance – so this same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and their orbital distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data depending on each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances are created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the planets data analysis show the solar planets dependency.
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?Gerges francis
Why Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance?
Best regards
When I have discovered that..
Saturn Orbital Distance = Saturn Uranus Distance
I have asked Why? But the usual answer was ……
It's Pure coincidence….!
Later I have discovered more equalities….As the following:
1. Saturn Orbital Distance = Mars Orbital Circumference = Pluto Eccentricity distance = Saturn Uranus Distance = 1433.5 million km
2. Mercury Saturn Distance = Neptune Pluto Distance = 1375 million km
3. Saturn Pluto Distance = Mercury Neptune Distance = 4436.5 million km
Then I have asked again… why These Distances Are Equal? Is there a geometrical reason behind?…but the usual answer always be …. " Pure Coincidences"
The question wasn't so simple and the answer was mentioned…. I ask clearly… are the solar planets members in the same body? or parts in the same building?- shortly are the solar group as the human hand and the fingers are similar to the planets? means the planets are created and moving depending on each other because all of them consist one machine –one body –one building – one geometrical structure – means the planets aren't separated from each other– but connected with each other.
(that means the space between the planets is a method to connect each planet with others and not to separate each planet from the others)…. This is my question aim!
And the current theory understood that clearly…
And told also a clear answer … that
Any solar planet is separated from the others - each planet is found and move independently..
So the two visions are clear before our eyes ……And the fighting is clear also….
The Solar Group Classical Vision: tells us that… the planet is created independently and move by gravity with the sun without effect of the other solar planets….
My Suggested Vision Is:
The Solar Group is one body – one machine – one building – one geometrical structure – No Planet can be found or move independently from the other planets …. Even the sun herself can't be found without the solar planets… we deal here with one machine – one geometrical structure- so if this geometrical structure has many elements we should be wise enough to see that these elements are members in the same geometrical structure and this structure is found by the cooperation and integration of his members…..
We should fight to prove that we are correct and the current theory is mistaken… Please read the argument…
Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?
Abstract
Paper Question
"Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon?"
Based on what this question is asked? What meaning is behind?
The Earth Moon is created by a direct effect of Jupiter – means – if Jupiter doesn't effect directly on the Earth Moon Creation – the moon should have change in its own data
i.e.
The Earth moon has its own data values (diameter - mass – orbital inclination …etc) this data is created by its Values because of Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation otherwise this data should be changed
Shortly
- If Jupiter didn't effect on the Earth moon creation process – the Earth moon diameter shouldn't be 3475 km and its mass should change from 0.073x 1024 kg also its orbital distance can't be 0.384 mkm and axial tilt should change from 6.7 degrees and its orbital inclination should not be 5.1 degrees ….similar to that, all Earth Moon Data should be changed…
- The next question is – Why Jupiter did effect on the Earth Mon Creation? This question is out of this paper scope – here we try to prove that – the Earth Moon Data is created by its values just because of Jupiter effect on it.
- How to prove this claim – I use The Planets Data Analysis Direction as a method of astrophysics research to prove this fact –
(The Planets Data Direction Method is explained in the paper methodology)
Paper Contents
2- Can Jupiter effect on the Earth Moon Creation?
3- Mars Migration Theory Revision
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Total Solar Eclipse Phenomena proves the following claim.
- The Solar group is one Trajectory of Energy and Each Planet is a point on it
- The Solar group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in this same machine
- The solar group can be similar to one body and each planet is a member in this same body (where the same energy creates all solar planets and their orbital distances, similar to the blood which causes to create all body members)
- Also the solar group is a similar to a great river has many canals where these canals create soils on their banks (the soils are similar to the planets and the canals are similar to the orbital distances)
- The solar planets motions are done in cooperation with each other to perform one job where each planet motion does one task in this same great job
Clearly
The total solar eclipse is done because of a geometrical reason which creates the planets diameters (and even the sun diameter) in geometrical relationships with their distances to enable the total solar eclipse to be occurred
Shortly
No one Solar Planet can be found or move independent from the other planets (even the sun can't be found without the solar planets)
This paper tried to answer the questions:
-Why Jupiter orbital circumference = The Inner Planets Orbital Circumferences Total + Saturn Orbital Distance?
-Why Mercury Day needs 5040 seconds to be =176 solar days?
-Why Mercury Pluto Distance = 5848.2 mkm?
Paper Conclusions
-There's a light beam its velocity =1.16 mkm/sec in the solar system
-Jupiter Data Shows The Solar System Energy Distribution
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The sun obliquity disproves newton theory of the sun mass gravityGerges francis
The Sun Obliquity Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The sun obliquity on ecliptic (7.25 degrees) proves that, Earth Is Found Before The Sun Creation.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The paper hypothesis tries to disprove Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity.
- While Newton told us, The Sun Is The Planet Motion Reason, the paper hypothesis tells, Earth is found and moving before the sun creation. as a result, we conclude that, Earth Motion Doesn't Depend On The Sun.
- This conclusion be valid for all solar planets. Means, Newton Theory of The sun mass Gravity is mistaken.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Earth moves with light velocity relative to the sun (i)Georgy Tawdrous
The Earth moves with C velocity (light velocity) relative to the Sun
i.e.
The light is produced by The Earth Motion, where
The Earth transforms her motion mechanical waves into light waves, producing the light beams
These light beams travel to the sun and reflect on her where the sun is just a mirror.
The Earth Motion = The Solar Planets Daily Velocities Total based on new time rate defined by the Earth.
Abstract
- The Solar Planets motions are relativistic motions
- Earth real Velocity = 0.99 c
- The time is an Energy
- Based on Relativistic Motions, the distances values can be seen as time values
i.e.
- The time is equivalent for the distance
(a development for the Special Theory of Relativity made by me)
- The Solar group geometrical structure depends on the time and Distance equivalence (based on relativistic motions), to create different rates of time, which enables the system to accumulate the Energy
Let's summarize this idea in following:
- Based on the solar group relativistic motions, time and distances values are equivalence
- The solar geometry uses unified distances to create different values of time, which are seen by different cycles
- The time different values depend on each other to create different rates of time
- By this different rates of time the Energy can be accumulated to produce huge energy from average one.
- Based on this description, the solar planets motions produce the sun light beams
Does Earth Velocity Causes The Eclipse Phenomena? (T.S. Eclipse III) Gerges francis
Why We See the Sun Disc = the Moon Disc? (T.S. Eclipse II)
Total Solar Eclipse Analysis (Part I)
In this paper we ask does Earth velocity effects on total solar eclipse?
We deal here with the velocity and not the motion
That means
The question can be as following:
If Earth moves by different velocity, can that effect on the eclipse phenomena?
Let's think ….
Why the total solar eclipse is occurred? Because the moon moves between the sun and Earth…! It's NOT Enough….
Venus moves between the sun and Earth but doesn't cause any solar eclipse…. The point here that we see the sun disc = the moon disc…. That's why when the moon moves between the sun and Earth that creates solar eclipse….
Why we see the moon disc = the sun disc? We have discussed that in (part II)
Here we deal with new question…
If Earth velocity changes, does it effect on the solar eclipse?
Let's think
The total solar eclipse is a process done by 3 players (Earth, moon and the sun). to put the three planets on the same straight line we need some configuration between the 3 planets motions to produce the angle 180 degrees between the 3 players…
So Earth velocity is a player which faces the 2 other players… any velocity change may effect on the eclipse geometrical structure but to perform the eclipse event the three players have to cooperate with each other…
The Concept (Cooperation And Integration)
This concept is what I try frequently to explain and prove.
Without the cooperation and integration between the planets the solar group can't be found or even can't be created…! The cooperation is the source of life .....etc
The Moon Orbit Analysis
Earth Moon motion has specific 4 points which are:
1. Perigee Point (R1) : Radius 363000 km from Earth (the nearest point)
2. Total Solar Eclipse (R2) : Radius 377000 km from Earth
3. Average Moon Orbit (R3) : Radius 384000 km (registered)
4. Apogee Point (R4) : Radius 406000 km from Earth (the most far point)
These 4 points are defined by 4 geometrical rules which are:
- (1st Rule) Pythagoras rule : R2n + (86000km)2= R2n+1
(why 86000 km? we'll discuss that in this paper)
- (2nd Rule) Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn= (1/Rn+1)
- (3rd Rule) (Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn+1/ Moon Orbital Circumference at Rn) =1.0725
- (4th Rule) The Rate 365.25
This paper tries to prove this fact, and discusses more deep question… why the moon orbital different radiuses are defined by these 4 geometrical rules?
Mars Migration Theory Supports The Conclusion That "Saturn Must Be Created After The Earth Moon Creation"
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
- Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
- Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
- From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I. Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II. The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III. Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV. Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V. Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI. Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Gerges francis
Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Motion Features Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity
- Where
- Planet Motion Features Prove Light Motion Effect On Planet Motion.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- Many new features are discovered in the solar planets motions among which:
- (1) The Solar Planets Move One Unified General Motion
- (2) The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates of Time
- (3) The Solar system Distances Be Created In A Network Form
- (4) The Solar Planets Motions Data Be Used Mutually Among Planets
- The previous features disprove Planet Motion Independency Concept inherited by Newton Theory of The Sun Mass Gravity- the features simply gives us a different vision about the solar system motion.
- Instead of the rigid body moving by the sun mass gravity independently from other rigid bodies in creation and motion data, The Solar Planet be a similar to a point on one trajectory of energy. where the solar planets move together one unified motion as train carriages transporting among the planets the motion with the rates of time making the solar system as a great Clock its input one motion creates (one second) and its output another motion creates (one solar day).
- And the 2 motions depend on one another as 2 gears in one machine of gears.
- Can this vision be a fact?
- I claim Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity is created out of imagination basically because the sun is created after all planets creation and motion.
- How can I prove my idea against Newton theory?
- By Planets Motions Data Analysis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Paper Arguments
- The paper provides 2 basic arguments
- (1st Argument)
- The Paper disproves Newton Theory of The sun mass gravity and proves that the solar planets motions can't be independent motions from one another but each planet motion depends on other planets motions.
- This discussion concludes that, the solar system distances be created in a network form, integrated together in one geometrical design.
- The argument conclusion is (The solar planet move one unified general motion)
- The 1st Argument Depends On (Jupiter Motion Analysis)
- (2nd Argument)
- The Paper claims that the solar planets motions be accompanying with a light beam motion which provides the required energy for the planets and their distances creation (because matter is created of energy and space is created of energy)
- The light motion accompanying with the solar planets motions cause the planets to move one unified general motion.
- The 2nd Argument Depends On (Mercury Motion Analysis)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Cycle 2737 Years Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Cycle 2737 years depends on Metonic Cycle,
Metonic Cycle is produced by an effect of Uranus Motion on the Earth Moon motion.
Mercury, Venus and Saturn be effected by Uranus motion effect on the moon motion. As a result these 3 planets create the Cycle 2737.
Paper objective
- The Paper provides my claim against Nobel Prize Decision for Physics 2021
Paper hypothesis explanation
- In December 2012, many sites referred to some new astronomical phenomenon be repeated one time each 2737 years. The 3 planets (Mercury, Venus and Saturn) be in parallel above the 3 great pyramids heads in Egypt – this interesting event be occurred while the Mayan calendar be ended its long cycle (more than 5000 years)
- Some people expected great earthquake during December 2012, but nothing be occurred. Some people told that they recorded the event of the cycle (2737) and other people claimed that the event is not true.
- I have searched after a theoretical method to know if this cycle is a real one. This is an interesting approach because it answers why the cycle be done? For example we don't know why Earth has a cycle of 4 years (1461 days). That makes this approach is a rich method in discussion and analysis
- The research conclusion I have written in a hypothesis form. Metonic Cycle be produced by Uranus Motion Effect on the moon motion.
- This conclusion be supported by the fact, Uranus Orbital Distance = 19.2 Earth Orbital Distance. And if Uranus and Earth move by equal velocities, Earth would revolve around the sun 19.2 revolutions (years) while Uranus revolve around the sun one revolution only – while Metonic Cycle be 19 years – the equal values (19 and 19.2) give some confidence that Uranus motion caused Metonic Cycle
- This conclusion is the paper discussion cornerstone. Because it disproves Newton Theory of the sun mass gravity. Newton theory is an imaginary idea and no planet moves by the sun gravity. Because of that, The planets motions data and features contradict Newton Theory of The sun gravity.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)Gerges francis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time (Revised)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time
Paper Hypothesis Explanation
- The planets motions rates of time be defined by using ONE RULE
- Based on the planets motions rates of time, the planets orbital periods and distances be defined. means,
- Based on this One Rule, the solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined.
- If the solar planets motions be independent from one another, how their orbital periods and distances be defined based on one rule only?
- The paper provides a proof that, the planets motions use different rates of time which proves that, the solar planets move one unified general motion. means,
- The solar planets motions be integrated with one another and created one unified general motion, because of that, the planets motions need to use different rates of time to enable their motions to be integrated into one unified general motion.
- This fact changes the solar system description inherited from Newton theory of the sun mass gravity. The solar planets be similar to carriages in one train move together one unified motion. also the solar group can be similar to a mechanical clock, and the planets be similar to the gears of this clock. Each gear does one motion (and creates one rate of time) and these motions be integrated into one unified gnarl motion (and the rates of time be integrated into one unified general rate of time)
Paper objectives
- The paper provides the rule based on which all solar planets orbital periods and distances be defined, and test all planets motions data to prove that, no planet motion contradicts this rule.
- The paper tries to answer the question (why the solar planets use different rates of time) by providing The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory.
- The paper is divided into 2 parts.
- (1st Part) Provides the rule and its proves discussion
- (2nd Part) Provides The Solar System Creation And Motion Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
The Solar System Motion Analysis (Questions and Answers) (III)Gerges francis
The document discusses relativistic effects in the solar system motions. It hypothesizes that matter is created from light beams, so light motion features should be found in planetary motions. The document lists several light motion features that have been discovered in planetary data, including relativistic effects. It suggests relativistic light motion is hidden behind geometrical rules governing planetary motions.
Is Saturn The Last Planet Created In The Solar System? Gerges francis
This document discusses whether Saturn was the last planet created in the solar system. It presents several pieces of data showing relationships between Saturn's orbital characteristics and those of other planets like Mars, Venus, and Earth. The author argues this shows Saturn's data was dependent on and came after the other planets, indicating Saturn was created last. The document's main conclusions are that Saturn was the last planet created and that the solar system planets were created relative to each other, with their data dependent on one another.
Uranus and Neptune orbit perpendicular to the plane of the other planets. The document provides equations showing relationships between planetary orbital distances, periods, and axial tilts intended to support this. In particular, it argues Uranus' unusually high axial tilt of 97.8 degrees results from relativistic effects and relationships to the moon's orbit via the Metonic cycle.
The observer effect on the observation results (space = energy=mc2)Gerges francis
1) The document discusses the observer effect on observation results and proposes that human mind and thinking can influence matter creation and the geometrical structure of the solar system.
2) It provides several examples of relationships between planetary properties like diameters and orbital distances that seem too coincidental to be pure chance.
3) The author's theory is that the human mind realization process can affect our vision of the solar system, and that the solar system's structure is an interactive process involving both its geometrical components and the human mind.
The Moon Geometry
The Moon Data Analysis shows the following:
1- Earth-Moon is an unique planet in the solar group and not similar to any other moon in the group.
2- The Solar Planets are connected together geometrically
i.e.
3- The solar planets are created to be complementary to each other, all of them together consist one geometrical structure (as a triangle, square, or pyramid….)
That means
a. There was an original energy before any matter existence. And from this energy the planet matter is created (based on E=mc2) and the planet orbital distance is created (I suppose the space = Energy). This same energy also causes the planet motion as part of the general geometrical structure.
b. Each solar planet is a part of this same geometrical structure and has a specific job in it (that means no part is absent..! means the original energy created all required planets to form the required geometrical structure)
c. Each Planet Data is created to be suitable for the planet job in the general geometrical structure..
Direction Of Energy Through The Solar Group Gerges francis
- The Solar Group Main Energy is sent from Jupiter to Pluto – This energy sending is continued for 2 sequence solar days
- Neptune used Jupiter Sent Energy consuming 16% of this total energy and the rest of Energy Neptune reflected it toward the inner planets into 2 Energy Trajectories.
o 1st Trajectory is sent to Earth (will be discussed Point No.4)
o 2nd Trajectory is sent to Mercury
- The 1st Trajectory of Energy is reached to Earth (with 86400mkm) – Where Earth reflected this energy into 2 new parts
o Part 1 the energy is sent from Earth to Venus
o Part 2 the energy is sent from Earth to (Jupiter & Uranus)
- The total energy (90000mkm) proves that all energy gathered together on one point only and no contradiction is found…
This explanation shows that the energy passes in cycle through the solar group
The previous idea supports my claim:
- The Solar Group is One Trajectory Of Energy and each planet is appoint on this same energy trajectory….. or
- The Solar Group is One Geometrical Structure or one building and each planet is a part of this same geometrical structure (building)- i.e. Each planet data is created to be suitable for the required task of this planet in the whole building …..and
- No solar planet can be found or move independently
a. Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in this same body. All solar planets and their orbital distances are created by the same energy (by the same blood all body members are created)
b. Or, The solar group be similar to one machine each planet is a gear in this same machine… so the machine job depends on the gears different tasks.. and that means the cooperation and integration between the solar planets data is the main base on which the solar group is created and move.
My Research Hypotheses
Abstract
During 2013-2019 I have studied the solar system geometry. Based on this study I have formed the following 5 basic hypotheses:
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Hypothesis No.2
Solar System moves as a train. i.e. A train moves with all its carriages together, similar to that – Solar Planets move together as one train in one unified motion (i.e. No Planet moves individually or independently from other planets motions)
Hypothesis No.3
Planet motion for 1 solar day depends on energy of light motion for 1 second period – that means – Planet moves following light motion – i.e. – Planet motion shows double motions – (1st) Light Motion (2nd) Its Follower Planet Motion
Hypothesis No.4
Solar System Unified Motion depends On Solar Day Period
Hypothesis No.5
Matter Creation process depends on solar day period of time – that means – Matter creation process depends on the time as one of its main components
In this paper I try to explain these 5 hypotheses and provide short proves for them
Jupiter Orbital Distance Proves, We See Wrongly The Solar Group,Gerges francis
This paper tries to prove the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis No. (1)
- Jupiter Is The Solar Group Central Point
- Jupiter Orbital Distance contradicts the solar group current description
Hypothesis No. (2)
- Solar Planet Motion Trajectory Can't Be An Ellipse
- Earth Moon motion effects on our vision and force us to see Planet Motion Trajectory as an ellipse (which is a wrong vision)
Planet Diameter & Orbital Distance Relationship (A Theoretical Analysis)Gerges francis
Abstract
Paper Hypotheses
(1)
There's A Relationship Between Planet Orbital Distance And Its Diameter.
(2)
- Human vision and realization process effects on the universe around
- The Matter is created as an effect of human mind on the universe around – Matter has no real existence.
i.e.
- Matter is created based on Human Vision (And Realization Process)- which depends on the distance – that explains why there's a relationship between planet diameter and orbital distance.
- There's no a proved relationship between planet orbital distance and its mass (In Planets Data) because the mass can't be measured by a vision
- That explains Planet diameter and orbital distance relationship reason
- That makes many of physics laws around us are rooted in human mind knowledge and realization process which explains why Planets move according to physics laws and not simply in chaos.
Shortly
- Human mind is a player in solar group geometry and without discovering of its geometrical role –the solar group geometry will be obscure forever
Planets Data Analysis Curriculum
1- Define And Discover The Directed Data
2- Suggest a hypothesis to explain how this directed data is created (the new hypothesis should depend on old hypotheses in one feature at least).
3- Provide other data arranged according to this new hypothesis to prove its credibility
4- Conclude the geometrical rule based on which the mentioned data is created
5- The concluded geometrical rules form the general geometrical design
6- Use all hypotheses to form one general hypothesis.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Planets Motions Description (Revised)Gerges francis
Paper Hypothesis
The Solar Planets Motions Create One Unified General Motion.
The Hypothesis Explanation
- The hypothesis tells the planets motions be similar to Train Carriages Motion
- Also the planets motions be similar to Chess Pieces Motions
- The hypothesis discovers One Law controls the solar system motion and data.
- The planets unified general motion forces each planet motion to be complementary with other planets motions to perform The Unified General Motion. as a result, The Planet motion be An Obligatory Motion.
- Based on that, The Solar Planet Can't Change Its Motion.
- The Solar Planet creates its data to be in consistency with its motion.
- Because, the planet can't change its motion, but can change its data to be in consistency with its motion. and because of that, the planet data be created in consistency with its motion.
- Because the planet motion be complementary with other planets motions.
- The planet data be created complementary with other planets data
- Based On This Vision
- The solar planets data be created based on One Geometrical Design.
- And
- The Planets Creation And Motions Data Be Controlled By One Equation Only
- The paper hypothesis gives a different vision from the solar planets classical description. because its tells that, (The Solar Planet Data Be Created Based On Geometrical Calculations And Rules). The classical description tells planets data be created by random process and without geometrical reasons behind.
- The Planets Unified General Motion proves discussion shows that, the hypothesis tells the fact.
Paper Main Question
- Can The Planets Motions By Masses Gravity Forces Create The Planets Unified General Motion?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
A Planned Design Be Found Before The Solar System Creation.pdfGerges francis
A Planned Design Be Found Before The Solar System Creation
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The solar system be created out of one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity = 1.16 million km per second.
Paper hypothesis Explanation
- (1st Question)
- Can Be A Planned Design Found Before The Solar System Creation?
- If there was a planned design found before the solar system creation, How can we know that? how to discover it?
- (1) (Planets Data Analysis)
- The question suggests a different vision toward the solar system creation and motion – instead of the planets which are solid bodies separated and independent from one another the question supposes that the solar group is one building and each planet is a part of this same building – or the solar group is similar to one machine of Gears and each planet is similar to a gear in it –
- This idea necessitates the planets data to be created complementary to one another because they are parts in the same one building – means- the planets data must be created complementary one another – by this vision – we can conclude that – One Law Controls All Planets Data.
- This idea tells, the planets data can be concluded theoretically without observation
- The paper proves this idea, and provides 5 equations by which the planets data can be concluded theoretically – the paper concludes Planets data by using these 5 equations (4 equations are mine and 1 equation depends on Kepler law)
- (2) Example For Explanation
- Kepler stated (Planet Orbit Defines Its Velocity), this law tells we can conclude planet velocity theoretically without observation if we know its orbital distance -
- The paper provides a similar meaning by my 5 equations by which we can conclude planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …etc all planets data can be concluded theoretically which proves that this data be created originally based on exact equations and mathematical calculations – that shows one design was found behind the solar system creation.
- (3) Does Planet Move Depending On Its Mass?
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong and no planet moves by the sun gravity – there are 3 reasons for this conclusion which are:
- (a)
- The gravitation equation is wrong equation because it doesn't define any planet orbital distance – where the initial condition claim is wrong because planet data be created based on exact equations and mathematical calculations as the paper proves by the 5 equations.
- (b)
- Planet velocity doesn't depend on its mass but on its orbital distance where planets velocities be decreased gradually with their orbital distances increasing while the masses don't support this graduation – that tells – the concept (Planet motion depends on its mass) losses its 2 component because neither planet orbital distance nor its velocity depend on its mass. (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar Group Geometry Analysis (Questions & Answers) (Part I)Gerges francis
The Solar Group Geometry Analysis (Questions & Answers) (Part I)
This Paper claims the following:
- The Solar group current Description and theory are incorrect and insufficient
- The Solar group current Description and theory contradicts the solar planet data geometrical analysis.
In this paper we discuss 6 questions with their answers which can show and prove the solar group current theory and description weakness and insufficiently…
The Questions Are In Following:
1- How The Planet Diameter Is Created?
2- How The Planet Orbital Distance Is Defined? By Gravity Force …is it True?
3- What's The Most Near Distribution For The Solar Planets Order?
4- Why Earth moves Daily A Distance = The Moon Orbit Circumference?
5- Why The Light Velocity Is The Universe Highest Velocity?
6- Can The Planet Mass be created independently from the other planets masses?
Paper Hypothesis
The Universe Is A Continuum
Explanation
Question no. 1
If the universe is a continuum why that disprove the big bang concept?
Because – in this case – the universe will no longer be created by some random process otherwise it can't be a continuum – to be a continuum its components should be created complementary to each other to consist together one continuum
Question no. 2
Why does the Special theory of relativity prove that the universe is a continuum?
Einstein told that Space-time is a continuum but he didn't tell that the universe is a continuum- Space-time is coordinates consist one continuum because it's coordinates –means – the time and distance values are defined by the point position in space-time – So when Einstein told the Space-time is a continuum he didn't effect on the universe geometry itself – he simply provided a new geometry to define the coordinates
But
When we accept the hypothesis that – the universe is a continuum - that means -we accept that the particle properties are defined by coordinates!
Specifically – that means – Particle Mass will be defined as time and distance in the space-time coordinates! But particle mass is a particle property and can't be defined by any coordinates! We have 2 different visions here!
But … in fact ....the particle high velocity motion changes its time, length and MASS
So, simply if the mass can be added to the space-time and defined as particle coordinates – so the special theory of relativity disproves the big bang theory
Otherwise –it can't …. In this paper I try to prove that – practical mass is defined as distance & time values – all of them are space-time coordinates – that proves the hypothesis – the universe is a continuum – and disproves the big bang theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Paper Argument
1-The 3 inner Planets (Mercury – Venus & Earth) were created by Jupiter effect
2-Mars Is Exceptional In Its Creation
3-Jupiter orbital circumference is created based on the inner planets orbital circumferences (i.e. there's a mutual effect between Jupiter and the inner planets)
4-The inner planets & Jupiter can't define the sun position in the sky relative to their orbital circumferences
5-Jupiter and the inner planets depend on Saturn to define the sun position relative to their orbital circumferences (Through Mars Effect)
6-Saturn depends on Uranus to define the sun position in the sky
7-Uranus Is The First Planet Created Relative To The Sun
8-The Basic Connection Between Jupiter And The Inner Planets depends On Venus, Where Jupiter Venus Relationship shows an effect on the sun creation.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research 1st hypothesis discussion (ii) (revised)Gerges francis
Hypothesis No.1
Solar System is One building (or one machine) and each planet is a part of this same building.
Paper Main Question
Why Does Uranus Orbital Distance = Saturn Orbital Diameter?
(Why does Saturn orbital distance = Saturn Uranus distance?)
Space Definition and Features
- Solar Planets are theater of puppets connecting by one trajectory of energy.
- Space is Energy and created as a result of light motion
- Uranus Orbital Distance is the solar system first distance created as a result of light motion for 1 second (1 second of light motion is equivalent to 1 solar day of planet motion – 3rd hypothesis)
- Saturn Orbital Distance is a defined distance by the solar system motion per a solar day
- Uranus and Saturn orbital distances are produced by one motion done in the same period of time by Earth Moon Effect.
- Earth Moon has no this great energy to effect on Saturn and Uranus orbital distances, but Earth Moon is the solar system general energy indicator and he defines where the energy will pass –that shows his effect secret.
This paper proposes hypotheses about how the moon was originally a light beam and how its orbital motion relates to the creation of matter in the universe. It discusses how the moon may have transitioned from a light state to a matter state based on interactions with another light beam. The paper aims to follow the moon's progression from light beam to planet and back again in order to better understand how matter and space are created in the solar system. Key points discussed include the moon orbit being related to the distance traveled by a 1.16 mkm/sec light beam in 1 second, and how the moon's mass and gravity were created from its original light state.
Why Don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?Gerges francis
Why don't We Understand The Solar System Geometry?
Because
Paper Hypothesis
- The Planets Motions are Motions of Light Beams, That means each planet motion depends on a motion of light beam – Based on that, we have to use the light geometry to explain the solar planets motions.
Shortly
- Planet Motion = Light Motion and should be studied under Relativistic Considerations
- Because we see the planets as matters move by low velocity– We consider that the light geometry is unsuitable science to explain the solar planets motions.
- That's Why – There Are Many Contradictions In The Solar Planets Motions Current Understanding And Description..
Paper Objective
- The Paper tries to prove the claim that
"The Solar Planets Motions Are Motions Of Light Beams"
Paper Hypothesis
-Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
-Mars & The Earth Moon Motions are Interacting because "Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion"
i.e. Even If The Earth Moon is created by Mars Collisions with Venus and Earth (through Mars Migration Motion)- but the Geometrical building of The Moon Planet still controlled by the same rules based on which Mars, Venus & Earth Were Created!
Why??
Because the light motion is the cause behind the planet motion-
And because of that – All planets motions are controlled by this same light motion –
Shortly
The light motion is the master and maker of the road and all planets are followers.
The paper discusses this hypothesis deeply-
First let's remember Mars Migration Theory – to discover the historical events by which the earth Moon was created from Mars collisions debris with Venus and Earth
Mars Migration Theory Revision:
-Mars original orbital distance was 84 mkm. and Mars had migrated to 227.9 mkm
-Through Mars Motion from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm, Mars had collided with Venus and then Mars had collided with Earth also.
-From the Collisions debris The Earth Moon was created –and Mars had found its moons. And the rest debris had attracted by Jupiter and created The Asteroid Belt
The Giant-Impact Hypothesis is in consistency with Mars migration theory
But Instead of the (Supposed Planet) Theia, Mars itself made the collisions.
Mars migration Theory solves The Giant-Impact Hypothesis difficulties:
I.Why Venus has No Moon? – Because Mars had migrated and moved from 84 mkm to 227.9 mkm and pushed all debris in its motion direction – far from Venus – So Venus had found no debris around to create its own Moon - But Earth has a greater Mass and the debris lost their motion high momentum at Earth Position– so Earth could attract some debris and create its moon
II.The Lunar Magma Ocean (LMO) Origin– is Venus – because the moon is created by 3 planets debris (Venus – Earth – Mars) – So their rocks are found in it
III.Why The Iron Oxide (Feo) of the Moon= (13%)? Because The rate (13%) is a middle between Mars rate (18%) and the terrestrial mantle (8%).
IV.Why Mars diameter (and Mass) are decreased through the history? Because of the collisions – Mars diameter lost around ( 4.1 %) (And Mars mass also which causes difficulties for Mars gravitation equation)
V.Mars migration is done Because of The Sun Creation Process
VI.Is there a possibility that Mars will return to its original point (84 mkm)? Yes
VII. Why? Because the Planet orbital distance is defined relative to its diameter (and Mass) Mars now is in the wrong Position- but forced to it because of the sun effect
Conclusion
The Giant-impact hypothesis supports Mars migration Theory
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research presentation (revised) (iv) (corrected) Gerges francis
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Paper Basic Question
Why do we analyze Jupiter Data and effect on different Planets?
Because
I try to prove that,
-The planets motions are light motions but we see them motions in planets motions form
-It's a light beam which causes the planets to move in front of us in the sky
-There's no gravity from the sun, there's no Big Bang theory – No more imaginations
-It's A Light Beam Motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
The Solar System Geometry Analysis
Research Presentation (More Discussion)
Research Claim
Classical Mechanics Science is insufficient to explain the Solar System Motion.
Because
The Solar System Motion shows Geometrical Effects and Features can't be created by Rigid Body Motion Mechanics
Research Suggestion
The Solar System Motion should be explained through Relativistic Motions Science
Research Hypothesis
Planet Motion depends On Light Motion
(As the horse and cart – light motion is the source of energy which cause planet motion- so light is the horse and planet is the cart).
Research Presentation Contents
1- Research Hypothesis Proves
2- Research Hypothesis Analysis
3- Planet Motion Mechanism
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
2012 Phenomenon Has Told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon).pdfGerges francis
Best greetings –
2012 Phenomenon has told Facts Because (The Sun Is A Phenomenon)
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The sun is a phenomenon created by the planets motions – means - the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the sun rays be created by Planets Motions Energies total- As a result – the sun is created after all planets creation and motion which disproves Newton theory of the sun gravity where no planet moves by the sun gravity –
The hypothesis explanation
The sun creation as a phenomenon depends on the planets motions energies shows a great gab between the solar system motion description and the real facts of this motion –for that reason – I provide 2 more points to confirm this gab existence while the 2 points be less strange in meaning can prove clearly this gab is found deeply in the description– not only for the sun rays source of energy but also for the basic ideas of the solar system motion.
(Point No. I)
The Mass Gravity Force Can't Cause The Solar System Motion
The planet moves by the force which caused its creation otherwise this planet will be broken by its motion because 2 forces affect on it- Newton Is Wrong In Logic – But –
I wish to move beyond this point –because – I refuse generally the mass gravity force using as a reason for the solar system motion – the idea is wrong in concept –
Basically because
The mass gravity force is so limited force in range and can't provide the solar system motion features – we need one more powerful and intelligent force – the eclipse phenomenon may help this explanation –the force which created the planets diameters in proportionality with specific distances – and the sun diameter be used also in this process- the force considers each planet motion and velocity – thinking about the whole process to produce the total solar eclipse by many players their creation data be created for this purpose.
Usually the total solar eclipse be considered as pure coincidence result and the beauty of geometry be removed- the paper analyzes the eclipse geometrical data to show a small part of the beauty –
Can the mass gravity poor concept do that? the description Newton told can explain how the matter be created? or how is planet data created? why is the moon diameter =3475 km? because if it be 5000 km the whole geometry will be changed….
The moon creation can help to see another part of this force beauty – the moon be created by planets collision but the moon diameter be created based one exact equations – means- the force works geometrically even through the collisions
In fact
This idea also shows the gab between the solar system facts and the current theory because – while – the current description supposes the planets data be created by random process, initial conditions and unknown historical factors that fact is that the planets data be created based on exact equations
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Rays Production Theory
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Rays Energy Source Is The Planets Motions Energy – means- The Sun Is Not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays – instead – the planets motions energies total be used to create the sun rays.
The hypothesis explanation
I- The Sun Rays Creation Depend On The Relative Motion Concept
This point provides the method by which the sun rays be created – the rays creation depend on the relative motion – that means- we need to find 2 motions in the solar system move relative one another and the different velocity between the 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
Regardless – this is possible or not – our job be defined clearly –
We need 2 motions move relative one another and the different velocity between these 2 motions be = Light Velocity = 300000 km/sec
II- Can We Attribute Mechanical Features For The Space?
Here we try to produce the 2 relative motions –
(Let's suppose the sun isn't found but the planets still revolve around its space point)
We have to attribute mechanical features for the space – let's do that in following
We suppose the space be similar to a sea water and the planet be similar to a stick moves perpendicularly through the sea water – this is similar to – a spoon turns water in a vessel - the spoon motion through the water causes a wave in the water –
The theory supposes the planet motion causes a wave in the space –
let's use this hypothesis in our analysis…
Mercury revolves around the sun (point) with velocity 47.4 km/sec – how to see that in our description?
Mercury (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Mercury velocity is 47.4 km/sec and that causes the wave velocity to be (47.4 km/sec)
And -
Venus (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion – Venus velocity (35 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec = 82.4 km/sec)
And – The Earth moon (a stick moves through water perpendicularly) revolves around the sun point and causes to create a wave by its motion –the moon velocity (29.8 km/s) – by that the wave velocity be (47.4 km/sec +35 km/sec +29.8 = 112.2 km/sec) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is a Phenomenon, Created By The Planets Motions Energies (revised).pdfGerges francis
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one design – this design uses the distance 90000 million km as a distance unit.
The hypothesis explanation
The hypothesis tells – the planets distribution uses one design and this one design gives a chance for the planets to make their distances total equal 90000 million km for a unit period of time – there's a necessity to use this distance we explain here.
The data shows 2 facts
(1st Fact) One Map (One Design) Controls The Planets Distribution Between The Sun And Pluto –
(2nd Fact) This One Design Uses The Distance 90000 Million Km As A Unit
Paper first question
Why does the solar system design use the distance 90000 million km as a unit?
Let's answer in following…
If (c =300000 km/sec = light velocity) how can we measure the value (c2)?
Let's suppose we use the value (c2) for one second – how can we measure it?
In this case the value (c2) will be = 90000 million km
Now
The hypothesis tells, the planets motions aim to pass this distance (90000 million km) and to use this distance based on A Motion For A Period Of Time = One Second
(We Discover In The Paper Discussion How This Motion Can Be Created)
As a result –
The distance 90000 million km will be a equivalent to the value (c2)
And
The value (c2) is the source of energy from which the sun rays be created.
Based on that
The Sun Rays Be Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total
Means,
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion - Instead – the planets motions energies total be accumulated and be used as energy source to produce the sun rays- then the sun disc and body be created from the sun rays energy.
And
Because the planets motions aim to create the sun rays they aim to pass the required distance 90000 million km and the solar system design causes this distance to be used by a motion depends on one second
Paper second question
Can Light Beam Be Produced By Matters Relative Motion?
The planets motions distances total per solar day (=17.75 million km)
(This distance contains the Earth moon velocity which is equal Earth velocity)
During 1461 days the planets motions distances total be =25920 million km
Light (300000 km/s) travels in one day (86400 s) a distance =25920 million km
But the Earth Cycle is (365 +365+365+366 =1461 days)
The idea tells us – if 1461 seconds of the Earth motion = 1 second of the sun motion – the velocities difference between the 2 motions will be= Light Velocity (300000km/s)
The paper discusses how that can be possible- but – here – we discuss the conceptual question- can light beam be created by matters relative motion?
The planets data tells about a new method which is (Motions Use Different Rate Of Time) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
means, Saturn moves by light velocity relative to the sun point –
The hypothesis Proof
The paper hypothesis tells Saturn motion causes to produce the sun rays
Let's prove that in following
(1)
The Planets Motions Use Different Rates Of Time Where
One hour of Mercury motion be = 24 hours of any planet motion (except Saturn)
One hour of Any Planet motion be = 24 hours of Saturn
These rates of time be proved in the paper discussion.
(2)
Saturn moves a distance =90000 million km in a period = 107470 days
The period 107470 days (of Saturn) = 576 x 186.6 days (Of Mercury)
Means this period (107470 days) be seen on Mercury as (186.6 days)
(3)
The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec –
This total be created relative to the point of space on which the sun will be created –
Means
We suppose the sun isn't found and the planets still revolve around the point of space on which the sun will be created-
Mercury (47.4 km/s) revolves around this point of space and creates a different in velocity with it = (47.4km/s)
Venus (35 km/s) revolves around this point and creates a different in velocity = 47.4km/s + 35km/s =82.4 km/s
The 9 planets velocities total 176 km/s causes to create a different velocity =176 km/s with this point of space
Now
The rate of time be created based on the rate of velocities –means
1day of this point of Space be =176 days of Mercury
(Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s)
But
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = 1.0725 days of the point of space
We know the rate (1.0725) effect on the solar system – for example – this rate effect on 40% of all distances and 60% 0f all planets axial tilts and effect on many other data-
By this rate (1.0725) the period (1.0725 days) will be = one day
Means
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space
But
The solar system creation theory tells– the planets matters and their distances be created from one energy and this energy be provided by one light beam and the planets move with this light beam based on the rate of time (One Second of Light motion be = One Solar day of Planet Motion)
This must be the same rate be used with the space because the matter and space be created together.
As a result
107470 days (of Saturn) be =186.6 days (of Mercury) = one day of the point of space =one second of light motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
(1)
The Sun Rays Be Produced By Planets Velocities Total - The Sun Is Not Doing Nuclear Fusion
Light (300000 km/sec) travels in one solar day a distance = the solar planets motions distances total in 1461 solar days–
The solar planets velocities total uses this rate of time (1=1461) and produces light velocity (300000 km/sec) from the planets velocities total
(2)
If the solar planets motions can't produce light velocity the solar system would be destroyed.
Paper conclusion
Because the sun rays energy be provided by the planets motions energies total and the planets move in cycles – that necessitates – the sun creation and death depend on a cycle –means- after this sun be dead another sun will be created because the sun is a phenomenon created based on a cycle (as the eclipse)
The hypothesis explanation
(1)
The Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created Out Of One Energy -
This idea can be acceptable simply by the physics book because it's known that the matter and space be created of energies – here – I add one idea only tells that-from the same one energy the planets matters and their distances be created –
The matter and space have different forms spite they be created from the same energy because the creation rules be different for them- as the oil and coal - they be created from the same source but the creation rules be different and the forms be different as a result
The idea causes basic change in the solar system motion description–because –instead of the separated planets as separated points – we deal with one energy which causes to create a continuum of data – by that –the data can be transported among the planets (in fact it does).
The idea doesn't create any new thing– but – it discovers the unjustifiable description for the planets motions – where it be believed that the planets are separated from one another as islands in a sea and no connection can be available – this description is mistaken in concept because the matter is created of energy and the space is created of energy and it's illogical to prevent the contact between them -here – the transportation of data among the planets should be a proved fact depend on the planets motions.
Shortly
The continuum of data of the solar system is a logical fact should be proved, and the separated points description should be considered unjustifiable vision.
A Conclusion
From one energy the planets matters and their distances be created
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
The Sun Is A Phenomenon
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
The solar planets velocities total be equivalent to light velocity 300000 km/s
The hypothesis explanation
- The Sun Is A Phenomenon Created By The Planets Motions –
- Means-
- The Sun Rays Energy Source Isn't Any Nuclear Interaction Found Inside The Sun – But – The Sun Rays Energy Be Found By The Planets Motions Energies Total
- Shortly
- The Planets Velocities Total Be Used As One Motion Velocity – And This Motion Uses A Rate Of Time To Reach To Light Velocity.
- Let's explain that in details in following…
- (1)
- We need to suppose that (One Hour Of Mercury Motion =24 Hours Of Any Planet Motion) and
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Solar Days Of Saturn Motion)
- These rates of time be proved in the discussion clearly –
- (2)
- The 9 planets velocities total be =176 km/sec – this value be seen in Mercury Data as (176 solar days = Mercury Day Period)
- We conclude that, Mercury controls this velocities total 176 km/s
- And
- After The Earth Moon Creation, the moon velocity 29.8 km/sec be added to the 9 planets velocities total (176 +29.8 =205.8 km/s)
- The total 205.8 km/s be seen in the moon motion data as (205.8 x π =655.7) (error 1.4%) where (655.7 hours = the moon rotation period)
- That tells the velocities total be seen also in the moon rotation period (a cycle period as Mercury)
- But
- Why for Mercury used (DAYS) but for the moon used (HOURS)??
- Because
- (One Hour Of Mercury Motion = 24 Hours Of The Moon Motion)
- (3)
- The total (205.8 km/s) can create the velocity 300000 km/s only if the rate of time (1=1461) be created – let's see the light velocity creation -
- 300000 km = 205.8s x 9.7 km/s x 24 x 2π
- Let's explain how the light velocity (300000 km/s) be created.
- The planets velocities total (205.8km/s) moves for 1second and passes 205.8 km, this distance be sent from the moon to Saturn in a period form (205.8 seconds)
- But (one hour of any planet motion = 24 hours of Saturn motion) for that reason the period (205.8 s of the moon motion) be equal = (205.8 s x 24) of Saturn motion.
- The rate (2π) be found by the geometrical design
- The data tells, each second Saturn moves, passes a distance =9.7 km but the solar system passes a distance =300000 km
- If the solar system moves (one motion) and uses (one velocity) for this distance (300000 km) for each second - The Solar System Velocity Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) – means – The Planets Velocities Total Should Be Equivalent To Light Velocity (300000 km/s) (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022).pdfGerges francis
Please help (1-9-2022)
National Bank Of Egypt Practice The Fraud (2020-2022)
National bank of Egypt practice Fraud and Breach of Trust
Because
It refused the judgment issued by The French ministry of Justice and denies the money by judged and disregarded the Foreign Court Judgment.
Sent to the honorable united Nations Secretary – General
António Guterres
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
best Greetings
The Sun Creation Process
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Light Beam Energy The Solar System Be Created
And
This Light Beam travels with 1.16 million km per second
The hypothesis explanation..
- (1)
- The solar system be created out of one light beam energy –
- The solar planets matters and their distances be created of one energy and this one energy be provided by one light beam and this light beam travels with velocity 1160000 km/s –
- Shortly
- The physics book accepts that (matter and space be created of energies)
- The hypothesis adds one idea only tells
- (from the same one energy the solar planets matters and their distances be created) this is the hypothesis main idea –
- Matter and Space creation be done from the same stuff (energy) but by using different geometrical rules –the idea is similar to the creation of the oil and coal both be created from the same source but they have 2 different forms because the creation process depend on 2 different geometrical rules.
- The matter and space creation process can be summarized by the following data
- (light 1.16 million/s = matter + space + light 300000 km/s)
- The data tells the input energy be a light beam its velocity 1160000 km/s, from this energy the matter and space be created and the light known velocity 300000 km/s be created as a side product from the process.
- Briefly
- If we find Matters in the universe – we can't find the light velocity 1160000 km/s because its energy be consumed in the matter and space creation process and produced the known light beam velocity 300000 km/s as a side product.
- Based on this vision
- The matter be a geometrical point found on a trajectory of energy or (on a light beam) – by that – the matter moves by light motion –
- Imagine a rock in a tube form be found in some sea water and the water passes through this rock tube and pushes the rock itself to move with the water-
- That answers the question (how does planet move?) no sun gravity be used here – instead – the planet moves by light motion from its energy the planet be created.
- Here we disprove Newton theory of the sun gravity – because
- By one force the planet be created and moving otherwise this planet will be broken by effect of 2 forces on it – here – the force caused the planet creation is the light beam energy and the force causes the planet motion is this same light beam motion- that explains the safe planet motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
Paper hypothesis
Venus motion effect on the moon motion and causes the moon orbital period to be = the moon rotation period =27.3 days
The hypothesis explanation..
- The hypothesis explanation can be summarized in 3 questions:
- (1) Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (2) By What Equation Planet Diameter Can Be Defined?
- (3) How Can Planet Diameter Equation Change The Solar System Vision?
- Let's try to answer these questions in following…
(1st Question)
Can Planet Data Depend On Exaction Equations?
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane or rocket manufacture – the manufacturer needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all specifications, otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period, axial tilt …and all data based on Exact Equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically without observation which prove this fact decisively.
- Then we have to ask (How Planet Data Be Created In Order?)
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves this fact – because – it proves each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2=4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orbital distance
- Example (Venus orbital distance)2= 4 (Mercury orbital distance) x50.3 million km (Venus orbital distance=108.2 million km Mercury orbital distance =57.9 million km)
- This equation be tested and discussed in this paper – but its concept is a clear one – it tells the planets leave an empty space for the new planet – for that reason each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance.
- Logically the new planet can't disturb the current planets positions or motions trajectories – by that –the orbital distance be defined by the neighbors positions –
- (3)
- The new planet has to revolve around the sun based on its orbital distance which be defined obligatorily where no data of this planet be taken into consideration in its orbital distance definition –neither mass nor diameter – instead – the distance be defined based on the neighbor distance.
- But
- Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance – otherwise – this planet will be broken through its motion –
- The function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is the necessary requirement to cause the planet safe motion
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Vodafone-Egypt Practices a fraud and breach of trust during 2013-2022.pdfGerges francis
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
Vodafone –Egypt practices a fraud and breach of trust during (2013-2022)
2013-2022: Egypt authority prevented any job from me and prevented me to travel abroad- They Torture My Mother By Electric Shock And Try To Kill Her By Insulin Injection- they threaten our lives –Please Help
2010-2013: I have studied in Faculty of physics & Math– Physics Department – Peoples Friendship University of Russia – Moscow – Russian Federation.
2013-2022 (Details) - Because I couldn't return to Moscow - I have performed an interesting research in astrophysics- many international physicists interested for it – while Egypt authority realized my research importance they:
(I) torture my mother by electric shocks to force me stop publishing my papers
(II) They practice hacking on my accounts & Telephone Calls (+201022532292).
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Petition (with signature) (Egypt Persecution Against The Coptic).pdfGerges francis
Please help
Egypt Authority Persecutes The Coptic -Please Help
EGYPT AUTHORITY TRIES TO KILL MY MOTHER – PLEASE HELP
(Also they force my family to send me to the madhouse)
Because
Egypt Authority tries to STEAL my astrophysics research results, I worked in it since 2013 till now –Egypt authority torture us to steal my research – they hanged many of my accounts and even prevent me to write my research papers by using torture.
(They try to burn my laptop- which is my only source for all my research materials)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Passport No./ A11263731 ID. No./27410090102716
Address /11 Mohamed Rageb st- Madenet El Saada – EL Materiya District – Cairo – Egypt
Planet Diameter Be A Function In Its Rotation PeriodGerges francis
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- Planet Diameter Be Created As A Function In Its Rotation Period
The hypothesis Explanation
- (1)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations –
- As a plane manufacture – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight …etc otherwise this plane can't fly safely.
- The moving planet under the physical laws has to define its data based on exact equations otherwise this planet can't move safely.
- I have discovered 5 equations can conclude Planets Data theoretically prove this fact decisively.
- (2)
- Planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation - because – the planets motions leave an empty place for the new planet – by that- each planet orbital distance be defined by the other planets orbital distances and motions trajectories.
- My first equation proves each planet orbital distance depends on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance –
- d2 = 4d0 (d-d0) where d= planet orbital distance and d0= its neighbor orb. distance
- We test and discuss this equation in the current paper–
- As a result –
- The planet found itself in an obligatory position be defined by other planets data and the planet data itself has no role in its orbital distance definition.
- (3)
- Planet motion can be a dangerous one if this planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance – means- the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken (The mass can decrease planet velocity – but the wrong diameter can break it) – for that reason – the planet has to create its diameter as a function in its orbital distance to move safely.
- But
- If the function has only 2 variables (planet diameter and its orbital distance), If this planet changes its orbital distance for any reason its diameter will be broken as a result –
- The designer had to create the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance as indirect function contains many other variables and by that if the planet changes its orbital distance the other variables will be changed but the diameter will be saved.
- As a result
- Planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance – by that – the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance be created but contains also other variables to protect the diameter.
- My fourth equation proves this fact let's see it
- (4)
- Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
- (v1/v2) = (s/r) =I
- v = Planet Velocity
- r= Planet Diameter
- s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
- I= Planet Orbital Inclination (a rate to inclination unit)
- v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
- we test, discuss and analyze this equation in this current paper.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
-Physics and Mathematics Faculty - Peoples' Friendship university of Russia –
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae).pdfGerges francis
Gerges Francis Tawdrous (Curriculum Vitae)
My Research Argument
(Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity?)
1-Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations
Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – All planet data be created based on exact equations and geometrical rules - No single data be created based on random process, initial condition nor unknown historical factors.
As in a plane or a rocket manufacture, the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width, weight and all its specifications and dimensions –
If this plane data be created by inaccurate dimensions, this plane can't fly
Similar to that
Planet moves through the space under physical laws and if its data be not created based on exact equations this planet will be broken through its motion – because – the safe motion necessitates a full harmony between planet data one another and with the physical laws controls the motions through space
In this investigation we try to define how Planet creates its data – or in more accurate words – By What Order Planet Data Be Created? what data be created at first and what be later? – by that – we can discover the harmony original point.
I have discovered 5 equations by which we can conclude planet data theoretically without observation that proves the idea decisively
2- Planet Orbital Distance Be Defined Before Its Creation
This simple fact be proved by 2 basic proves – "First Proof" The Logical Analysis
The current planets positions define the new planet position
The balancing effect of the planets motions forces the new planet to take the left place for it – because the planets revolve around the sun in their trajectories of motions – for that – the new planet has to find a place far from these trajectories.
Imagine you are in some crowded bus – the people pushed you to the last place in this bus because it's the only free place there – you came later and this is the only available place for you – by that – you are forced to accept this place
Planet orbital distance be defined before the planet creation – the logic proves this fact clearly
"Second Proof"
My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
My equation tells– Planet Orbital Distance Depends On Its Neighbor Distance
It's a simple and a trustee equation – let's use Venus as example
(108.2 million km)2 = 4 (57.9 million km) (50.3 million km)
where
108.2 million km = Venus orbital distance and
57.9 million km = Mercury orbital distance and (50.3 = 108.2 -57.9)
(There are 3 exceptions – Earth depends on Mercury – Mars depends on Venus and Pluto depends on Uranus –
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity.pdfGerges francis
Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
Abstract
Paper Argument
- Planet Motion Logic Disproves Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
- (1)
- By one force planet be created and moving – means - the force which created the Planet– it causes its motion – as a result
- (No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity) because (The Sun Had Created No Planet)
- One more force caused the planets creation and their motions
- For that reason
- Planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another –
- For example (Mercury creation and motion data be in harmony one another) and Mercury moves safely and isn't broken
- But -we don't have 9 forces in the solar system – One force for each planet – instead – We have one force only caused All Planets Creation And Motion
- Now- let's ask
- How Can One Force Create 9 Planets And Causes Their Motions?
- This force needs to use One Geometrical Design to do this job – as 9 gears be moving by one motor we need a machine to do this job
- Based on this analysis – No planet moves by the sun gravity – Newton is wrong
- (2)
- The gravitation equation is wrong because no planet orbital distance be defined based on it- and that explains the contradiction between the planets masses order and their orbital distances
- This fact is a powerful against Newton – but the logic still more power
- Because
- The planet orbital distance be defined before this planet creation – because – the distance be defined by other planets distances – means - the new planet orbital distance be defined based on the balancing of the current planets motions trajectories and by that the new planet will find itself in a position defined obligatory by other planets –
- This fact be proved also by my first equation which proves that each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor planet orbital distance (Not On Its Mass)
- My First Equation tells (d2 = 4d0 (d-d0))
- d = Planet Orbital Distance and d0 = its neighbor planet orbital distance
- (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Discussed In The Paper)
- I want to say
- The principle idea is wrong because the distance be defined obligatory by other planets motions trajectories and planet mass can do nothing to change it
- (3)
- The logic still moves against Newton because
- The planet is found itself in an obligatory position and has to revolve around the sun from this position – now what about this planet diameter – because
- If the planet diameter isn't in harmony with its orbital distance this planet will be broken – here – Newton idea is wrong completely because he looked at the mass but planet mass can decrease its velocity where the wrong diameter can cause the planet to be broken – by that – the planet has to create a function between its orbital distance and its diameter to move safely otherwise it will be broken – the point is Newton defined the mass as the basic player! (continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department
,Why Does Planet Orbit Define Its Velocity, (Kepler Law Analysis).pdfGerges francis
The document discusses Kepler's law that a planet's orbit defines its velocity. It provides 5 points to explain this: 1) Planet data is based on exact equations, not random factors. 2) A planet's diameter should be indirectly related to its orbital distance to avoid breaking during motion. 3) A planet's mass affects its orbital inclination and limits variables in diameter equations. 4) A function is needed between a planet's orbit and velocity to connect variables like rotation period. 5) Newton's gravity theory and the Big Bang theory are incorrect because planet data requires exact geometrical rules, not chaos. The document aims to show planetary motions result from one precise geometrical design, not random forces.
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse (Questions And Answers)
Abstract
Paper objective
The paper answers the following questions
1. Can each planet orbital distance depend on its neighbor planet orbital distance? In this case how the distance between the sun and Pluto be created? (Can One Map Be Drawn For All Planets Orbital Distances?)
2. Is There a necessity to create a proportionality between planet diameter and orbital distance?
3. Can Planet rotation period be defined based on its velocity?
4. Correct The wrong sentence (Planet Diameter Should Be A Direct Function In Its Orbital Distance And By That This Planet Will Not Be Broken Through Its Motion?)
5. Why Does Venus Have The Longest Rotation Period In The Solar System?
6. Can Planet orbital Distance be Defined before this planet creation? where planet orbital distance be defined based on its neighbor orbital distance?
7. Why Doesn't The Planet Break After Its Creation?
8. Planet data be (Mass – Diameter- Orbital Distance- Period –Inclination….etc) what data be created at first and what be created later?
9. Explain The Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
10. Why does the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period (No For Tidal Locking – this idea is wrong)?
11. Can The Planets Velocities Total Be Defined At First And Each Planet Velocity Be A Function In This Total?
12- Can Solar System Depend On One Geometrical Design?
13- Why Does The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius = 406000 km?
14- Can Mars Orbital Distance Be Changed From 84 million km to 228 million km?
15- Did Newton realize The Solar system Motion Logic?
16- How Be The Sun Disc Created?
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised).pdfGerges francis
The Solar Eclipse Phenomenon Analysis (Revised)
Abstract
Paper Argument
The planets motions can be explained only based on the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System)
The Argument explanation
The solar planets are created complementary one another and their motions be integrated into one unified motion – by that- the planets be similar to members of one creature - Their creation data depends on one design and their motions be integrated together into one unified motion (as a machine of gears – many gears motions but the machine produces One Unified Motion)
Because of that
Any planet motion can be explained only through the concept (One Geometrical Design Be found Behind the Solar System), because based on this one design the planets be created and by this one design the planets motions be integrated and produced one unified motion.
Paper objective
- We have proved the one geometrical design before
- In this current paper we examine the one geometrical design details – by that the paper provides rich points of discussion because we discuss the geometrical details of this one design and their effects on the planets creation and motion data.
- The paper discussions points be summarized in following:
- (1)
- The paper proves the one design uses one map for the distance - means
- The solar system design uses the distance from the sun to Pluto as one piece of distance be distributed based on one map –
- (2)
- The paper proves the solar system design uses one more map for the velocities. by that, the design considers the planets motions be integrated into one unified motion as a machine of gears and this (unified velocity) be distributed for the planets velocities based on one more map.
- (3)
- The paper answers the question (why does the design use 2 different maps?) and explains the massive importance for this using
- The paper analyzes also my fourth equation to prove that – planet diameter be created as a function in its rotation period and the rotation period be created a function in its velocity and the velocity be a function in its orbital distance.
- (4)
- The paper disproves the tidal locking claim as a reason for the moon cycles periods equality – the idea is wrong – where – the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period because of the solar system one design effect on the moon motion.
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
The Dancing Planets
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
From One Energy The Solar Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created
The hypothesis explanation
- (1)
- Newton Theory of the sun gravity is wrong in its logic because by one force the planet should be created and moving –otherwise this planet will be broken -means- The force which created the planet it causes its motion – by that no planet moves by the sun gravity
- (2)
- The Big Bang Theory Is Wrong Because – It Supposed – The First Energy Was In A Chaos Form Resulting From The First Explosion – in Fact – The First Energy (Of The Solar System) was in A Geometrical Design Form.
- (3)
- The physics book accepts (Matter and Space be Created Of Energies) – The paper hypothesis adds one idea tells (From One Energy They Were Created) – means - The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy
- Let's see the paper basic ideas in following
- (A)
- Planet Data Be Created Based On Exact Equations- As any plane or rocket creation – the maker needs exact equations to define this plane length, width and All Other Specifications-
- Similar to that,
- Planet mass, diameter, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt – all data be created based on exact equations and no data be created by any random process, initial conditions or historical unknown factors.
- By that, the planets data can be concluded by mathematical calculations only
- My 5 equations prove this fact (The 5 equations be tested in point no. 3)
- (B)
- The Planet data Exact equations depend on One Geometrical Design –means-
- Because the solar system creation and motion depends on One Geometrical Design, the planets data be created based on exact equations
- The One Geometrical Design is the basic argument of the paper –
- It's similar to the electron and positron be created from Gamma ray (The double production experiment), The 2 particles charges total be (Zero) because gamma ray charge is (Zero)
- By that, one law controls the 2 particles motions – and similar to that – one law or One Geometrical Design controls the solar planets creations and motions
- Also, from Planet motion analysis- we can reach to this same conclusion
- We accept that, one force only be used for planet creation and motion, and the force which created the planet causes its motion –otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it- but
- We don't have 9 forces create the 9 solar planets and cause their motions – instead- we have only one force causes all planets creation and motion –
- This one force can do this job only by using One Geometrical Design -
(continued)
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Planet Diameter Definition Equation
Abstract
Planet Diameter Definition Equation (My Fourth Equation)
(v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
v = Planet Velocity
r= Planet Diameter
s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period
I= Planet Orbital Inclination
v2, s, r and I be belonged to one planet and v1 be belonged to another planet
The Equation Role
- The equation proves that, Planet diameter be created based on geometrical rule and as a function in this planet motion data –
- That tells, the motion was found and defined before this planet creation and for that the planet diameter be created depending on this planet motion data
The Equation Significance
- The Equation proves the argument
- By One Force The Solar Planets Be Created And Moving
- The sun didn't cause any planet creation, So (No planet moves by the sun gravity)
- By One Force and From One Energy All Planets Matters And Their Distances Be Created And This Energy Causes The Planets Motions.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Geometry Of Light Motion
Abstract
Paper hypothesis
- The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
- This one energy is provided by one light beam
- This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second
Paper objective
- The paper is consisted of 2 parts
- Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
- Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
- Let's refer to them in following..
Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second.
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity)
Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –
By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books
It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?!
I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them.
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created.
So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...Travis Hills MN
Travis Hills of Minnesota developed a method to convert waste into high-value dry fertilizer, significantly enriching soil quality. By providing farmers with a valuable resource derived from waste, Travis Hills helps enhance farm profitability while promoting environmental stewardship. Travis Hills' sustainable practices lead to cost savings and increased revenue for farmers by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste.
Current Ms word generated power point presentation covers major details about the micronuclei test. It's significance and assays to conduct it. It is used to detect the micronuclei formation inside the cells of nearly every multicellular organism. It's formation takes place during chromosomal sepration at metaphase.
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
Unlocking the mysteries of reproduction: Exploring fecundity and gonadosomati...AbdullaAlAsif1
The pygmy halfbeak Dermogenys colletei, is known for its viviparous nature, this presents an intriguing case of relatively low fecundity, raising questions about potential compensatory reproductive strategies employed by this species. Our study delves into the examination of fecundity and the Gonadosomatic Index (GSI) in the Pygmy Halfbeak, D. colletei (Meisner, 2001), an intriguing viviparous fish indigenous to Sarawak, Borneo. We hypothesize that the Pygmy halfbeak, D. colletei, may exhibit unique reproductive adaptations to offset its low fecundity, thus enhancing its survival and fitness. To address this, we conducted a comprehensive study utilizing 28 mature female specimens of D. colletei, carefully measuring fecundity and GSI to shed light on the reproductive adaptations of this species. Our findings reveal that D. colletei indeed exhibits low fecundity, with a mean of 16.76 ± 2.01, and a mean GSI of 12.83 ± 1.27, providing crucial insights into the reproductive mechanisms at play in this species. These results underscore the existence of unique reproductive strategies in D. colletei, enabling its adaptation and persistence in Borneo's diverse aquatic ecosystems, and call for further ecological research to elucidate these mechanisms. This study lends to a better understanding of viviparous fish in Borneo and contributes to the broader field of aquatic ecology, enhancing our knowledge of species adaptations to unique ecological challenges.
When I was asked to give a companion lecture in support of ‘The Philosophy of Science’ (https://shorturl.at/4pUXz) I decided not to walk through the detail of the many methodologies in order of use. Instead, I chose to employ a long standing, and ongoing, scientific development as an exemplar. And so, I chose the ever evolving story of Thermodynamics as a scientific investigation at its best.
Conducted over a period of >200 years, Thermodynamics R&D, and application, benefitted from the highest levels of professionalism, collaboration, and technical thoroughness. New layers of application, methodology, and practice were made possible by the progressive advance of technology. In turn, this has seen measurement and modelling accuracy continually improved at a micro and macro level.
Perhaps most importantly, Thermodynamics rapidly became a primary tool in the advance of applied science/engineering/technology, spanning micro-tech, to aerospace and cosmology. I can think of no better a story to illustrate the breadth of scientific methodologies and applications at their best.
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvementIshaGoswami9
As the population is increasing and will reach about 9 billion upto 2050. Also due to climate change, it is difficult to meet the food requirement of such a large population. Facing the challenges presented by resource shortages, climate
change, and increasing global population, crop yield and quality need to be improved in a sustainable way over the coming decades. Genetic improvement by breeding is the best way to increase crop productivity. With the rapid progression of functional
genomics, an increasing number of crop genomes have been sequenced and dozens of genes influencing key agronomic traits have been identified. However, current genome sequence information has not been adequately exploited for understanding
the complex characteristics of multiple gene, owing to a lack of crop phenotypic data. Efficient, automatic, and accurate technologies and platforms that can capture phenotypic data that can
be linked to genomics information for crop improvement at all growth stages have become as important as genotyping. Thus,
high-throughput phenotyping has become the major bottleneck restricting crop breeding. Plant phenomics has been defined as the high-throughput, accurate acquisition and analysis of multi-dimensional phenotypes
during crop growing stages at the organism level, including the cell, tissue, organ, individual plant, plot, and field levels. With the rapid development of novel sensors, imaging technology,
and analysis methods, numerous infrastructure platforms have been developed for phenotyping.
ESPP presentation to EU Waste Water Network, 4th June 2024 “EU policies driving nutrient removal and recycling
and the revised UWWTD (Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive)”
ESR spectroscopy in liquid food and beverages.pptxPRIYANKA PATEL
With increasing population, people need to rely on packaged food stuffs. Packaging of food materials requires the preservation of food. There are various methods for the treatment of food to preserve them and irradiation treatment of food is one of them. It is the most common and the most harmless method for the food preservation as it does not alter the necessary micronutrients of food materials. Although irradiated food doesn’t cause any harm to the human health but still the quality assessment of food is required to provide consumers with necessary information about the food. ESR spectroscopy is the most sophisticated way to investigate the quality of the food and the free radicals induced during the processing of the food. ESR spin trapping technique is useful for the detection of highly unstable radicals in the food. The antioxidant capability of liquid food and beverages in mainly performed by spin trapping technique.
ESR spectroscopy in liquid food and beverages.pptx
A Summary Of My Research
1. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
1
A Summary Of My Research
By Gerges Francis Twadrous
2nd
Course Student – Physics Department - Physics & Math Faculty –
Peoples' Friendship University – Moscow – Russia -2010-2013
TEL +201022532292 mrwaheid@gmail.com / georgytawdrous@yandex.ru
The Assumption Of S. Virgin Mary -Written in Cairo – Egypt – 24th
July 2019
Research Summary
I- Research Main Questions
1- How Planet Diameter Is Created? (= How The Matter Is Created?)
2- How Planet orbital distance is defined (= What's The Space?)
3- Is There A Relationship Between Planet Diameter And Orbital Distance?
(i.e. Does Space effect on Matter Creation Process?)
II- Research Methodology
I use the planets data analysis to discover the concepts on which they are created?
(I use NASA Planetary Fact Sheet as the only source for Planets Data)
III- Research Hypothesis
(A) Research Primary Hypothesis (have no proves)
- The Matter is created of Energy (E=mc2
supports this idea)
- The Space is Energy (my Hypothesis)
(B) Research Main Hypothesis (have proves)
1- The Solar Group is One Building And Each Planet is A Part Of It
2- There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group
3- Mars Orbital Distance is Changed Through Solar Group History
This Paper tries to explain and proves the previous claims
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Twitter https://twitter.com/TawdrousF
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
2. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
2
I- Research Questions Explanation
How The Matter Is Created? What's the Space? Is there a relationship between
the matter and the space in which the matter moves?
The eclipse phenomenon was the start point for this question….
The 1st
question was Why We See The Sun Disc = The Moon Disc?
Because
Why The Diameters Rate = The Distances Rate?
I don't consider the previous equation is found by any pure coincidence – and in fact
– I have a confidence that – There's A Geometrical Reason Behind This Equation
On the other hand – no theory tells us how the matter is created – even the big bang
theory – tells us that – the matter secret is hidden and can't be discovered
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km or Why Saturn Diameter = 120536 km? Such
questions have no geometrical meanings and never be discussed…
For myself – I interest for the geometrical buildings – for example – when I saw a
good machine – I ask how this machine is created? What are the machine
specifications and why the designer choose them? Such questions are important to
see the geometrical ideas behind the built machine –
In The Solar Group – The Analytical Questions Are So Poor – we don't why any
planet diameter equal its value- and also we don't know if there's a relationship
between the planet diameter and orbital distance – we know that a relationship
between Planet mass and orbital distance should be found – which in fact – can't be
proved in the solar group- where the solar planets order doesn't follow the gravitation
equation – that's why Jupiter isn't in Mercury Position, and also Uranus is nearer to
the sun than Neptune (Has Greater Mass)-
Eclipse Previous Equation suggests that – some relationship between the planet
diameter and orbital distance must be found –otherwise we can't see the sun disc =the
moon disc –
From this situation – I have concluded my problem in clear questions:
(1) How The Matter Is Created?
(2) What's The Space?
(3) Is there a relationship between the matter and space?
And decided to use the solar planets data analysis to answer these questions
Let's summarize the research methodology in next point.
400
DistanceMoonEarth
DistanceOrbitalEarth
DiameterMoonThe
DiameterSunThe
==
3. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
3
II- Research Methodology
I use Planets Data Analysis as my research method
What's Planet Data Analysis? Let's summarize it in following:
(1)
- Suppose we have a right triangle its dimensions are 3,4 and 5 meters, can we
use these three numbers to conclude Pythagoras rule z2
= x2
+ y2
?
- That's what I'm doing – I analyze the planets data to conclude the geometrical
concepts behind this data –
- I use NASA Planetary Fact Sheet (http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/)
(I use NASA Planetary Fact Sheet As The Only Source Of Planets Data)
(2)
- I depend on The Data Direction
Example
If we can't explain the previous equation- can we conclude the main concept in it?
There's Some Relationship Between these 4 Planets Axial Tilts
Someone will claim that's "Pure Coincidence"! but we see it's somehow difficult to
accept the same pure coincidence repeated three times
So – The Conclusion Is – There's A Relationship Between These 4 Planets Axial Tilts
This Conclusion is "A Data Direction"
(3)
How my research method can be evaluated? Is it useful method or not?
In anatomy science – the physician doesn't just look to the patient and conclude his
illness – rather – he examine the patient inner structure- that tells us Planet Data is a
treasure we can use in place of many imaginary ideas we may conclude form the
mere outer observation-
For example- the big bang theory tells us that –the solar planets are created by some
random process – from the nebula with gravity effect – but to the planet diameter
creation depends on the random as basic and no any planet diameter is created with
another planet diameter or relative to it – (this is the big bang concept) – simply it's
wrong concept because the eclipse phenomena tell us that the planet diameter is
created to be relative to another planet diameter- So the big Bang imaginary idea
gives us nothing – so why this theory is created? Because no data analysis is done
here – all planets diameters are created to be relative to other planets diameters – this
conclusion I got from Data analysis – and this conclusion doesn't only disprove the
big bang theory but also provides us with more complex question …"how Planet
diameter can be created in relative to another planet diameter" which we will discuss
in the research hypothesis.
0725.1
tiltaxailSatrun26.7
tiltaxailNeptune28.3
tiltaxailMars25.2
tiltaxailSatrun26.7
tiltaxailEarth23.4
tiltaxailMars25.2
===
4. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
4
III- Research Hypotheses
The research provides 3 hypotheses which are:
1- The Solar Group is One Building and Each Planet is A part of it
2- There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group
3- Mars Orbital Distance is Changed Through Solar Group History
In following
For each hypothesis we will study 2 points:
(1st
point) to explain the hypothesis …..and
(2nd
Point) to prove the hypothesis…
So The Hypotheses Discussion Content Should Be As Following:
1-1 (1st
) Hypothesis Explanation
1-2 (1st
) Hypothesis Proves
2-1 (2nd
) Hypothesis Explanation
2-2 (2nd
) Hypothesis Proves
3-1 (3rd
) Hypothesis Explanation
3-2 (3rd
) Hypothesis Proves
5. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
5
1- Solar Group is One Building and each planet is a part of it (1st
Hypothesis)
1-1 (1st
) Hypothesis Explanation
1-2 (1st
) Hypothesis Proves
1-1 (1st
) Hypothesis Explanation
Solar Group Alternative Description:
1- The solar group is one trajectory of Energy and each planet is a point on this
same trajectory
i.e.
2- The Solar Group is One Building and each planet is a part of this same building-
3- Also The solar group is similar to a train and each planet is a carriage of it.
4- Also the solar group can be similar to one body, and each planet is a member in it
5- Also, The solar group can be similar to one machine and each planet is a gear in
this same machine…
That means
6- When a planet moves –it doesn't mean this planet moves individually and
independently from the other planets- NOT TRUE – Any Planet moves with all
other planets together as a train moves will all carriages -
Description Basic Concept
Solar Planets cooperation and integration is the reason of their existence and
motion.
How to understand that?
WE know that the matter is created of Energy (E=mc2
) – but How The Space Is
Created? I suppose the Space is created of Energy also… (Space = Energy)
So the matter and space both are created from the same energy..
Can that be possible?
Energy has different forms (sun rays – nuclear interactions – oil- food ..etc)
Different forms for same content, i.e. it's possible to create matter & space of energy
Another Example
In double slit experiment (Young Experiment) – the light coherence produced bright
and dark fringes –regardless the experiment explanation – the experiment tells "when
one input is used (light)–outputs can be in 2 different forms (bright and dark fringes)"
The Solar Group Creation
I suppose the solar group is one energy creates the planet matter and orbital distance
– so this same energy passes through the whole group to create all solar planets and
their orbital distances from the same energy where this energy creates all planets data
complementary to each other because all of them are created from the same source.
Shortly
The solar group is one thread – as one necklace – all solar planets and their distances
are created from one energy to be complementary to each other- and that's why the
planets data analysis show the solar planets dependency.
6. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
6
1-2 (1st
) Hypothesis Proves
1st
Hypothesis Summary
The solar group is one energy travels from point to another creating the planet matter
and orbital distances …
Let's prove this hypothesis in following 3 points:
1st. The Solar Group Main Energy
2nd. Jupiter Energy
3rd. The Coherence Event
1st. The Solar Group Main Energy (A Brief Summary)
1. Jupiter sends his energy in light beams form Toward Pluto where the sending
energy is continuous for 2 complete solar days (Jupiter light beam velocity
=1.16 mkm/sec – hypothesis)
2. Jupiter Light beam reached to Pluto, and built Neptune Orbital Circumference
from This Energy (Neptune consumed 16% of the total energy to build its
orbital circumference) –
Then
3. Neptune reflected the rest of Energy toward the inner Planets
4. The rest of Energy = 2 x 86400 mkm – and this energy is sent into 2 equal
Trajectories of Energy – Each Trajectory contains 86400 mkm
5. 1st
Trajectory is reflected from Neptune Toward Mercury with energy =86400
mkm
6. 2nd
Trajectory is reflected from Neptune Toward Earth and Venus with energy
=86400 mkm
Then
7. These 2 Energy Trajectories (=light beams) got coherence together in the sun
position (before the sun Creation), and this coherence created an angle
θ=0.142984 degree (which we can call the coherence angle θ)
8. After this coherence the matter is created
9. Based on the coherence angle, Jupiter diameter is created with Mercury
Diameter in Mutual process… later Saturn Diameter is created
10.Also angle θ =0.142984 defines the distance between Earth and Moon and it
effects on Earth, Venus and Moon diameters creation
7. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
7
2nd. Jupiter Energy
A-Jupiter sends the Energy toward Pluto
B-The Energy Trajectories
C-The Coherence
A-Jupiter sends The Energy Toward Pluto
Jupiter energy is a light beam his velocity = 1.16 million km/sec, Jupiter sends this
Energy toward Pluto for 2 solar days (2 x 86400 seconds)
Means
1.16 mkm x 86400 seconds x 2 = 100581 x 2 mkm
I- Data
- (Pluto Orbital Circumference 36897 mkm – Jupiter Orbital Circumference
4894mkm) x 2Π = 100581 mkm x 2
II- Discussion
- Why I use 2Π in previous Equation? Because
o 2 x 100581 mkm = 28255 mkm + 2 x 86400 mkm
Where
o 28255 mkm = Neptune Orbital Circumference
o 86400 mkm = sent Energy Toward Mercury
o 86400 mkm = sent Energy Toward Venus and Earth
- What does the previous Equation tell us?
- Jupiter sent Energy toward Pluto will build Neptune Orbital Circumference at
first (consuming 16%) and the rest Energy will be reflected by Neptune toward
the Inner Planets in 2 equal Trajectories of Energy, each Trajectory contains
energy =86400 mkm .
Note Please
Distance = Energy
This Concept is our Guide to know how the energy travels through the solar group
So
The energy is sent from Jupiter and reflected by Neptune
That means
Jupiter and Neptune Orbital Distances are vital values for the inner planets distances
because they are their Energy source – let's see if it's true in following
8. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
8
More Data
(Group No. 1)
Neptune Orbital Distance
4495.1 Neptune Orbital Distance=
= Earth Venus distance 41.4 x Venus orbital distance 108.2
= Mercury Orbital Distance 57.9 x Earth Mars distance 78.3
= Mercury venues distance 50.3 x Mercury Earth distance 91.7 (error 2.5%)
Why the inner planets uses Neptune orbital distance such frequently?
Because Neptune reflected the energy toward them and they live on this energy –
shortly– the distance is energy and the inner planets define their distances according
to the maximum sent energy and the maximum is Neptune orbital distance
(Group No.2)
Jupiter Orbital Circumference
360 mkm (Mercury Orbital Circumference) + 680 mkm (Venus Orbital Circumference)
+ 940 mkm (Earth Orbital Circumference) + 1433.5 mkm (Mars Orbital Circumference)
x 2 = 4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference) (error 1%)
(Please Note –Mars Orbital Circumference is used 2 Times –because Mars is
exceptional among the solar planets – in hypothesis no.3 we'll discuss it)
(Group No.3)
Jupiter Orbital Distance
1. Mercury Jupiter Distance = 2 Mercury orbital circumference (Mercury moves
during his say =175.94 days – a distance = Mercury Jupiter Distance)
2. Venus Orbital Circumference = Venus Jupiter Distance (error 1.5%)
3. Earth Orbital Circumference = Earth Jupiter Distance
(when Earth and Jupiter be at different sides from the sun so 149.6mkm+778.6mkm=
928mkm = Earth orbital Circumference (error 1.3%)
Question
Why Jupiter orbital Circumference = inner planets orbital circumferences total?
The answer is similar to Neptune answer - because Jupiter is the inner planets source
of Energy and the inner planets can't use greater energy than what's sent.
The previous data supports my claim that
- The Distance Is Energy
- The Energy is sent from one point to answer point through the solar group
Please review
There's A Light Beam Travels With 1.16 mkm/sec
http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0236
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km? (1) http://vixra.org/abs/1907.0137
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 km (2)? (Revised) http://vixra.org/abs/1907.0321
Why Jupiter Diameter =142984 Km? (3) http://vixra.org/abs/1907.0377
9. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
9
B- Energy Trajectories
(1) Neptune –Mercury Trajectory (1st
Trajectory)
(2) Neptune – Venus and Earth Trajectory (2nd
Trajectory)
The Energy, reflected from Neptune, is sent in 2 different Trajectories let's see each
of them in details
(1) Neptune –Mercury Trajectory
Through this trajectory Neptune reflects an Energy = 86400 million km toward
Mercury passing by Saturn and Jupiter, where Jupiter here passed the Energy only
toward Mercury…
I- Data
86400 million km =
= (Jupiter Orbital Circumference –Mercury Orbital Circumference) x 2Π2
= (Saturn Orbital Circumference –Mercury Orbital Circumference) x Π2
Note Please
Neptune Orbital Circumference = Saturn Orbital Circumference x Π
II-Discussion
As we see the idea is clear and we have reason for the relationship between Neptune
and Saturn orbital distance …
Any way the description of passing the Energy from Neptune to Saturn to Jupiter to
Mercury is NOT sure description… we need to wait the coherence event discussion
before see much better… any way we may confirm on the trajectory from Neptune –
Jupiter – Mercury.. this line is almost confirmed…
(2) Neptune – Venus and Earth Trajectory
Through this trajectory Neptune reflected an Energy = 86400 million km toward
Venus and Earth directly
I- Available Data
86400 million km =
= (Neptune Orbital Circumference – Earth Orbital Circumference) x Π
= (Neptune Orbital Circumference – Venus Orbital Circumference) x Π
(Both Errors less than 1%)
II-Discussion
This Energy reflected by Neptune toward Venus and Earth – this energy helped Earth
to build her orbital circumference and to move performing here daily motion
In addition to help the moon motion performance
10. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
10
C- The Coherence Event
we have seen that, the Energy reflected from Neptune toward the inner Planets in 2
trajectories
1st
Trajectory is / Neptune – Jupiter – Mercury
2nd
Trajectory is / Neptune – Earth and Venus
These are 2 trajectories of Energy
We may call them 2 Light Beams where they are reflected by Neptune as any
reflected light beam
These 2 light beams are met each other and get coherence inside the sun location
before the sun creation (and before any matter creation)
i.e.
The Coherence Point is inside the sun
The coherence is done by these 2 light beams producing an angle θ=0.142984 degree
And this interaction and coherence is found inside the sun (position) before the sun
creation…
We should pay more attention for this point, because after this coherence the matter
will be created and we will have plenty of proves for any claim we may tell
Before to start…
Note Please
- We know in young experiment (double slit experiment) the light coherence
produces bright fringes and dark fringes –
- I suppose – we see the bright fringes as matters
- Dark fringes we see as distances
- (Imagine a dark fringe breadth is so wide and the people can live inside a dark
fringes – so the space relative to these people– in fact - is a dark fringe)
-
- That explains how– The Space Can Be Energy –
- And we can claim that all darkness and space around us are just dark fringes
produced by light coherence..
11. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
11
3rd. The Coherence Event
1- Introduction
2- Angle θ effects the planets orbital and internal distances
3- Angle θ defines Jupiter and Mercury diameters
4- Angle θ defines total solar eclipse angle
1- Introduction
Let's summarize the whole idea here again
- Jupiter sends his energy toward Pluto
- Neptune Orbital circumference is built at first from the sent energy
- Neptune reflects the rest energy toward inner planets, into 2 separated
trajectories
o 1st
Trajectory: Energy = 86400 mkm from Neptune to Jupiter to
Mercury
o 2nd
Trajectory: Energy = 86400 mkm from Neptune to Venus and
Earth
- These 2 Trajectories of Energy (2 light beams) will meet each other and
create a coherence between them
- The Coherence event is done in the sun position before the sun Creation
- The Coherence event creates an angle θ = 0.142984 degrees (between 2
light beams)
what we have from this story? angle θ=0.142984 degrees
is this angle really found?
If I can prove that, this angle is really found, can that support my theory?
If this "angle θ=0.142984 degrees" is one of the most important points in the solar
group, can that support my claim?
My ideas depends on the solar planets data! means, I found this rate frequently, that's
why I suggest the theory to explain this data,
The theory tries to answer the question, why the rate =0.142984 is repeated
frequently in different geometrical points? So the theory is a try to answer otherwise
another answer should be provided…
Let's see this angle θ and its effect in next discussions
12. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
12
2-Angle θ effects The Planets Orbital And Internal Distances
I- Data
Solar group orbital and internal distances total = 45 distances
The rate 0.142984 is used as a rate between around 22 distances, means this rate
expresses around 50% of the solar distances rates…let's see that in following
Table No.2 Max Error 2%
Distances Rate θ= 0.142984 Error
(Earth Orbital Diameter /Jupiter Uranus Distance) = = θ No Error
(Earth Mars Diameter /Jupiter Mars Distance) = = θ No Error
(Earth Saturn Distance /Saturn Orbital Circumference)= = θ No Error
(Earth Jupiter Distance /Venus Neptune Distance) = = θ No Error
(Earth Mercury Distance /Earth Jupiter Distance ) = = θ 1.8%
(Mercury Jupiter Distance /Jupiter Pluto Distance) = = θ 1%
(Mercury Mars Distance /Mars Saturn Distance) = = θ 1.5%
(Mars Orbital Distance /Uranus Neptune Distance) = = θ 1.7%
(Mars Jupiter Distance /Neptune Orbital Distance) = = θ 2%
Note Please
Previous table uses Max Error 2% only
means, there are more relationships defined by this same rate 0.142984 but with
higher error and I refused to save the data direction
let's see 2 examples of such relationships in following
(Mars Uranus Distance / Uranus Orbital Circumference) = = θ 2.5%
(Venus orbital Distance / Jupiter orbital Distance) = = θ 3%
II- Discussion
The rate 0.142984 is used for around 50% of the whole distances,
Why?
I don't know by what mechanism this angle effects on these distances, still we need
more search to know that,
But
To use the same rate for half of all solar distances can't be "Pure Coincidences" at any case!
Surely there's a geometrical reason behind this rate frequent using…
And I provided one geometrical reason as following:
Because matter is a bright fringe and distance is dark fringe both are produced
by light coherence, and Angle θ = 0.142984 degree is the coherence angle, for
that reason theses relationships are found ..
Is the previous table a proof that the angle θ= 0.142984 is found?
Let's see more data
13. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
13
3-Angle θ defines Jupiter And Mercury Diameters
"Jupiter Diameter is Created based on angle θ= 0.142984 degrees" (my
Claim)
First/ Jupiter Diameter Creation
I-Data
1-
nInclinatioOrbitalMercury
1
7
1
142984.0 ===θ
2- θ= 0.142984 x 1 million km/1degree = 142984 km (Jupiter Diameter)
Note Please
Why we use 1 million km/1 degree?
If we have a rate 1 degree = 1 million km, that means θ= 0.142984 degree will
=142984 km which is Jupiter Diameter.
Where can we find such rate 1 degree = 1 million km? It's Mercury Orbital
Circumference
- Mercury Orbital Circumference = 360 million=360 degrees ….means 1
million km = 1 degree
- Mercury Orbital Circumference is the first Cycle around θ (because θ locates
inside the sun)
Mercury Diameter Creation
I-Data
Mercury Diameter 4897km x 1 million km = Jupiter Orbital Circumference
Let's here summarize the puzzled points to be shown clearly
- θ =0.142984 degree is related to Mercury because it equals (1/ Mercury orbital
inclination)
- θ =0.142984 defines Jupiter diameter if we use mercury rate 1 million km/0.989
degree
i.e.
- Jupiter Diameter = (1 Million Km /Mercury Orbital Inclination) (Eq 1)
- Mercury Diameter = (Jupiter Orbital Circumference /1Million km) (Eq 2)
14. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
14
400
RaduisEarth
ceCircumfeenOrbitalMoon
DistanceMoonEarth
DistanceOrbitalEarth
DiameterMoon
DiameterSun
===
4- Angle θ defines Total Solar Eclipse Angle
I-Data
Let's ask, what's the angle θ=0.142984?
θ
In the figure
- The two near bodies are the Earth and Moon
- And the far body is the sun
- Angle θ =0.142984 degrees
Angle θ =0.142984 degree is found basically through Sun, Earth and Moon distances
and diameters …i.e.
Distance
Distanceoon
sin
OrbitalEarth
MEarth
=θ
This angle is the same angle which is produced by the 2 light beams coherence
The same angle has the same value and is found in the same position (inside the sun)
This angle is a main factor in the eclipse phenomenon
Let's see that in following
"AngleEclipseSolarTotal"degrees532.0
DaimeterMoon
DaimeterEarth
sin φθ =×
I wish we remember
3.66
DaimeterSaturn
nceCircumfereJupiter
DistanceMoonEarth
DiameterSun
D
DaimeterMoon
DaimeterMoon
DaimeterEarth
=====
φ
θ
π
D: is the covered distance on Earth by the total solar umbra shadow =304 km
II-Discussion
We had strong discussion concerned the eclipse phenomena, let's remember our basic
question why do we see the Sun Disc = The moon Disc…? Because
What we have learnt from that? Why the diameters rate = the distances rate?
This was the hard question.. so let's answer now
Because the diameter is bright fringe and the distance is a dark fringe both of them
are produced from light coherence, from the same process both are produced based
on the same angle θ =0.142984 degree
15. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
15
2- There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group (2nd Hypothesis)
2-1 (2nd
) Hypothesis Explanation
2-2 (2nd
) Hypothesis Proves
2-1 (2nd
) Hypothesis Explanation
How this idea is created?
- I have found that – the rate 1.0725 is used frequently between different Planets
orbital and internal distances and between many other data (as we have seen in
the research methodology)
- Also the rate 7.1 is used frequently
- From length contraction phenomena – we know that- if particle travels with
velocity v1 =0.99 c (where c is light velocity) – so the length contraction rate
will be =7.1 (1)
(2)
(1.071 is very near to 1.0725)
From 1 and 2 I have concluded that both rates may be one rate =7.1 but in Result No.
2 this rate (7.1) is used in some complex system- means it's not used directly but
though some complex geometrical processes – so both are one rate only
I have concluded that this rate 7.1 is found by lorentz length contraction effect as a
result of velocity v1 =0.99c which is found in the solar group but we can't observe it
Also
If v1 =0.99c and this value passed through lorentz equations for any reason
It will be
(0.99c)2
= 0.9999c – I understand the equation result isn't completely correct because
of C2
but – this conclusion will produce the velocity 0.9999c
Now imagine v2=0.9999c also is found in the solar group
Length contraction rate will be 71 (3)
And more important
Earth velocity =0.0001c ….. that means
0.9999 c + 0.0001 c = light velocity (4)
The result no. 4 has components are known for us – simply we have these data in the
solar group except the velocity v2=0.9999c
which we can conclude ….
Conclusion
The Solar Group has higher velocity =0.99c spite we can't observe this velocity – we
can observe its length contraction effect on the planets distances (any many other
data) – and based on these contraction cases we can conclude that the velocity is
found really.
071.1
100
7.1
1 =+
16. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
16
2-2 (2nd
) Hypothesis Proves
Let's proof this Hypothesis…
I-Data
- The Rate 1.0725
I – Data (Distances)
1. 0725.1
mkm2.41nceCircumfereOrbitalMoon
mkm2.58MotionDailyEarth
= (No Error)
2. 1.0725
km)(378500radiusEclipseSolarTotal
km)(406000radiusorbitalApogee
= (No Error)
3. 0725.1
distanceMercuryJupitermkm720.3
DistanceOrbitalJuppitermkm6.778
= (0.7%)
4. 1.0725
DistanceVenusJupitermkm670
distanceMercuryJupitermkm720.3
= (No Error)
5. 1.0725
DistanceEarthJupitermkm629
DistanceVenusJupitermkm670
= (0.6%)
6. 1.0725
mkm)(1325.3DistanceVenusSarurn
mkm)(1433.5DistanceOrbitalSaturn
= (Error 0.8%)
7. 1.0725
mkm)(1205.6DistanceMarsSarurn
mkm)(1284DistanceEarthSaturn
= (Error 0.7%)
8. 1.0725
mkm)(2644DistanceMarsUranus
mkm)(2872.5DistanceOrbitalUranus
= (Error 0.7%)
9. 1.0725
mkm)(4495.1DistanceOrbitalNeptune
mkm)(4894nceCircumfereOrbitalJupiter
= (Error 1.5 %)
II – Axial Tilts Data (Periods)
1st- 1.0725
Tilt)Axial(Earthdegrees23.45
Tilt)Axial(Marsdegrees25.2
= (No Error)
2nd- 1.0725
Tilt)Axial(Marsdegrees25.2
Tilt)Axial(Saturndegrees26.7
= (Error 1.2%)
3rd- 1.0725
Tilt)Axial(Saturndegrees26.7
Tilt)Axial(Neptunedegrees28.3
= (Error 1.2%)
4th- 1.0725
n)InclinatioOrbital(Neptunedegrees1.8
n)inclinatioOrbital(Marsdegrees1.9
= (Error 0.7%)
17. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
17
III – Data (Periods)
5th- 1.0725
Month)Sidereal(Lunardays27.3
Month)Synodic(Lunardays29.53
= (Error 0.8%)
6th- 1.0725
Period)Orbital(Venusdays224.7
Period)Rotation(Venusdays243
= (Error 0.8%)
7th- 1.0725
Day)(Neptunehours16.1
Day)(Uranushours17.2
= (No Error)
8th- 1.0725
Day)(Jupiterhours9.9
Day)(Saturnhours10.7
= (No Error)
I-Discussion
Simply we try to find explanation why all these data are rated with 1.0725?
Let's discuss the planets axial tilts only as example
How do we understand this equation?
From Jupiter Energy Discussion - We know that – Neptune reflected the energy
toward the inner planets..
That means Neptune is the inner planets source of energy
That makes Neptune axial tilt the master value in the previous equation
(remember please 1 degree = 1 mkm….. Why? Because (1) Mercury orbital
circumference =360 mkm =360 degrees and (2) the solar group is one machine – so
any planet can use Mercury rate)
Let's start
28.3 degrees (Neptune Axial Tilt) will be contracted with the rate 1.0725 to produce
26.7 degrees (Saturn Axial Tilt)
(That may explain why Neptune orbital distance = Saturn orbital distance x π)
Then Saturn Axial Tilt (26.7 degrees) will be contracted by the same rate (1.0725) to
produce 25.2 degrees (Mars Axial Tilt)
(That may explain Why Mars orbital circumference = Saturn orbital distance)
Also Mars axial tilt 25.2 deg will be contracted (1.0725) to produce 23.4 deg (Earth
axial tilt) (That May Explain Why Earth Orbital Distance = Earth Mars Distance X
Mars Orbital Inclination)
For full discussion please review
There Are Relativistic Effects In The Solar Group http://vixra.org/abs/1903.0565
Time And Distance Equivalence (Proves) http://vixra.org/abs/1904.0125
0725.1
tiltaxailSatrun26.7
tiltaxailNeptune28.3
tiltaxailMars25.2
tiltaxailSatrun26.7
tiltaxailEarth23.4
tiltaxailMars25.2
===
18. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
18
3- Mars Orbital Distance is Changed Through Solar Group History (3rd
Hypothesis)
3-1 (3rd
) Hypothesis Explanation
How can we know that – if Mars orbital distance is changed through history?
Because The Solar Group Is One Building – so any change can be seen in this
building data and will be seen in other planets data
That means – if we can prove that Mars orbital distance is changed through history by
planets data analysis that will produce also 2 important results
1. It supports the claim that the solar group is one building and each planet is a part
of it
2. it supports also the claim that "Planet Data analysis is the correct method to study
the solar group geometry"
Let's try to do that in following:
(1)
- The inner planets order (Mercury – Venus – Earth) shows that there's some the
relationship between planet diameter (or mass) with their orbital distance,
means Greater Diameter (Or Mass) needs Greater Orbital Distance …
(2)
- The outer planets order (Jupiter- Saturn- Uranus- Neptune – Pluto) tells that the
rule is reversed where Greater Diameter needs Shorter orbital Distance ….
But…. The order depends on diameter and NOT Mass because Uranus
Diameter is greater that Neptune where Neptune Mass is greater than Uranus..
(3)
- (The Conclusion) there's some relationship between the planet diameter and
orbital distance but this relationship is reversed after Mars for some reason-
(Also The Data Direction doesn't support the relationship between the planet
mass and orbital distance which disproves the sun gravity concept)
When I asked this question… the answer was because of the "Initial Points"
But I couldn't accept this answer…because
- The inner planets and outer planets orders provide 2 different forms For The
Same Rule ….. So the nearest conclusion is that there's a relationship between
the planet diameter and orbital distance where Mars position in the solar group
order causes disturbance for this relationship.
Conclusion
Mars Is Not Suitable For Its Position In The Solar Group Order
19. IN THE ALMIGHTY GOD NAME
Through the Mother of God mediation
I do this research
Gerges Francis Tawadrous/
2nd
Course student – physics Faculty – People's Friendship University – Moscow –Russia..
mrwaheid1@yahoo.com mrwaheid@gmail.com +201022532292
19
3-1 (3rd
) Hypothesis Proves
Main Idea
- Mars Orbital Distance was 84 mkm found after Mercury directly
Also
- Pluto was before Mercury – means Pluto was nearer that Mercury to the sun
(or better conclusion – Pluto was the Mercury Moon)
- Mercury Day was 176 solar days
Then
- Mars Immigrated from his original point (84 mkm) to dwell in its new point
with orbital distance = 227.9 mkm
- Mars Immigration caused Pluto to immigrate also
- Mercury Day decreased by Value 5040 seconds as a result of Pluto
Immigration
The proves are long story – so
Please review
Mars Orbital Distance Is Changed Through History
http://vixra.org/abs/1905.0510
Pluto was "The Mercury Moon"
http://vixra.org/abs/1807.0331
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Linkedln https://eg.linkedin.com/in/gerges-francis-86a351a1
Twitter https://twitter.com/TawdrousF
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
All my papers http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous