I used this presentation as an additional source to study for my TOGAF 9 exams. In the end I passed both y Level I and Level II exams. This might help you as well.
This is a very short introduction to The Open Group Architecture Framework -- a framework for enterprise architecture. It is meant to provide an executive summary of what TOGAF is and also provide a few reasons why you should use it.
The latest version of the TOGAF standard has special emphasis on Business Architecture, Digital Trends, and Business Transformation beyond IT. Stuart Macgregor takes us through some of these changes to the TOGAF® 9.2 standard and discuss how they will benefit us.
I used this presentation as an additional source to study for my TOGAF 9 exams. In the end I passed both y Level I and Level II exams. This might help you as well.
This is a very short introduction to The Open Group Architecture Framework -- a framework for enterprise architecture. It is meant to provide an executive summary of what TOGAF is and also provide a few reasons why you should use it.
The latest version of the TOGAF standard has special emphasis on Business Architecture, Digital Trends, and Business Transformation beyond IT. Stuart Macgregor takes us through some of these changes to the TOGAF® 9.2 standard and discuss how they will benefit us.
Changing the Security Landscape: An overview of the powerful SABSA Business Attributes Profiling technique and it's applications and benefits including two-way traceability, risk & opportunity management, strategic planing and executive reporting.
A Practical Example to Using SABSA Extended Security-in-Depth Strategy Allen Baranov
A practical example of using the SABSA extended Security-in-depth layer strategy. A little bit of insight into why and how I extended the original and how to use it to create Information Security Standards that have sound architecture behind them.
Regulatory Approval Process for Medical Devices in EU - Presentation by Aksha...Akshay Anand
A presentation on Regulatory Approval Process for Medical Devices in European Union that explains in brief about the various aspects including the EU Medical Device Directives, Classifications, CE Certification, Medical Device Registration & Timelines. This was presented as a part of curriculum by Akshay Anand in JSS College of Pharmacy, Mysuru during January 2015
WEB PORTAL INTEGRATION ARCHITECTURE APPROACHESijwscjournal
Enterprise Modelling with Web portal integration architecture requires investment of advanced architectural thinking into definition of services before any development of services or service consumers can begin. Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) is gradually replacing monolithic architecture as the premier design principle for new business applications with its inherently systematic nature and capability. Earlier efforts of notable styles of SOA such as CORBA and XATMI have failed to be adopted as main stream projects because of demanding design process requirement with sense-making activities and even have been residing with the modern SOA or Web services middleware. In this paper it is aimed to incorporate sensemaking design activities with the proposed semantic web service based architecture. This paper tries to tackle the above problem by proposing a service-oriented architecture for web data and service integration. A gen-Spec architectural pattern has been suggested and adopted in order to tackle the problem. Firstly, it proposes a service-oriented platform independent architecture and Secondly, it presents a specific deployment of such architecture for data and service integration on the web using semantic web services implemented with the WSMO (Web Services Modeling Ontology).
WEB PORTAL INTEGRATION ARCHITECTURE APPROACHESijwscjournal
Enterprise Modelling with Web portal integration architecture requires investment of advanced architectural thinking into definition of services before any development of services or service consumers can begin. Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) is gradually replacing monolithic architecture as the premier design principle for new business applications with its inherently systematic nature and capability. Earlier efforts of notable styles of SOA such as CORBA and XATMI have failed to be adopted as main stream projects because of demanding design process requirement with sense-making activities and even have been residing with the modern SOA or Web services middleware. In this paper it is aimed to incorporate sensemaking design activities with the proposed semantic web service based architecture. This paper tries to tackle the above problem by proposing a service-oriented architecture for web data and service integration. A gen-Spec architectural pattern has been suggested and adopted in order to tackle the problem.
Firstly, it proposes a service-oriented platform independent architecture and Secondly, it presents a specific deployment of such architecture for data and service integration on the web using semantic web services implemented with the WSMO (Web Services Modeling Ontology).
The Role of the Enterprise Architect in Business Process ReengineeringRichard Freggi
Business Process Reengineering is often a challenging undertaking. This paper is a case study, sharing practical experience of how the enterprise architect can help in three ways:
• Provide a common language allowing different organizations, consultants and IT teams to communicate effectively
• Set the right level of abstraction to facilitate analysis and solution of complex questions
• Reconcile user’s wants and needs with the capabilities and constraints of IT systems
Reference is made to the Zachman Framework, especially the columns for “Data”, “Function” and “People”; and how these columns can be used to interact with stakeholders using UML (Unified Modeling Language).
Executive Overview Using Soa To Improve Operational Efficiencysean.mcclowry
Overview on how services oriented architectures can be applied to improve operational efficiency. Introduced in the context of the MIKE2.0 Methodology.
Discussion Post 1A software process model is a streamlined port.docxmadlynplamondon
Discussion Post 1:
A software process model is a streamlined portrayal of a product procedure. Each model speaks to a procedure from a particular point of view. The straightforward reason for these methods is to offer an altered programming advancement according to the prerequisites. Now and then they are otherwise called software improvement life cycle (SDLC) approaches. There are different sorts of models:
1. Waterfall model: When we have an organized procedure and when our necessities are clear as in basic frameworks that need itemized, exact, and precise archives to portray the framework to be delivered. It isn't acceptable when prerequisites are not satisfactory and on the off chance that they continually change and not defenseless for client communication. The periods of the cascade model are: Requirements, Design, Implementation, Testing, and Maintenance.
2. Prototype model: This model is utilized for the advancement of an early example, or the arrival of an item worked to test an idea. This is helpful when prerequisites aren't clear. In spite of the fact that it needs great apparatuses, brisk turn of events, and significant expenses. The periods of a model are: Establish goals, Define model usefulness, Develop the model, Evaluate the model.
3. Incremental and Iterative: They are appropriate for huge tasks and are more affordable to the difference in prerequisites since they bolster client associations with every addition. They don't fit into little ventures or very much organized tasks. The periods of iterative advancement are Inception, Elaboration, Construction, Transition.
4. Spiral: It is useful for highly hazardous or enormous ventures where the necessities are questionable. The venture's prosperity is exceptionally reliant on the hazard examination stage. It doesn't function admirably for littler ventures. Each circle in the winding speaks to a stage. Each circle is part of four areas: Objective setting, Risk appraisal, and decrease, Development, and approval, Planning.
5. Agile: It suits little medium size undertaking, with quick changes in the necessities as a client is included during each stage. Exceptionally constrained arranging is required to begin with the undertaking. There are a few distinctive dexterous techniques accessible, for example, Scrum, Crystal, Agile Modeling (AM), Extreme Programming (XP), and so on.
Discussion Post -2
Rapid Prototyping Model
It follows an iterative model of software development. This model is certainly found to be focusing on implementing the simple and initial phase but finds it difficult and complex when setting the broader feature when it is completed. Reduction of cost and time wastage along with improvement of model user-friendliness serves as its major strengths while inadequate analysis and high cost of prototype implementation give its limitation (Scacchi, W. 2002).
Advantages:
- Absolutely unacceptable for ...
Stepping-stones of enterprise-architecture: Process and practice in the real...Tetradian Consulting
What do we do when we’re doing enterprise architecture? What issues do we tackle, in what sequence, for what business reasons, for what business value? And how do we get results fast? This presentation describes how to adapt the Architectural Development Method (ADM) from The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) for use in all types of enterprise architecture - for IT and beyond - and at all architecture maturity-levels.
[Presentation at TOGAF Conference, London, April 2009. Applies to TOGAF versions 8.1 and 9. Copyright (c) Tetradian Consulting 2009]
Enterprise Architecture & Solution Architecture- Traverse the GapSmartinfologiks
Implementing Enterprise Architecture (EA) can result in improved organizational efficiency, better alignment of IT systems with business goals, and reduced costs and risks. Solution Architecture (SA) can help optimize technology solutions to meet specific business needs, increased productivity and efficiency, and improved customer satisfaction.
Know More: https://blog.smartinfologiks.com/solution-architecture/enterprise-architecture-solution-architecture-traverse-the-gap/
Service oriented configuration management of software architectureIJNSA Journal
Software configuration management (SCM) is an important activity in the software engineering life cycle. SCM by control of the evolution process of products leads to constancy and stability in software systems. Nowadays, use of software configuration management is essential during the process of software development as rules to control and manage the evolution of software systems. SCM effects different levels of abstraction included the architectural level. Configuration of software architecture causes improvement in the configuration of the lower abstraction levels. CM of software architecture is more significant in large scale software with longevity of life cycle. Traditional SCM approaches, at the architectural level, do not provided the necessary support to software configuration management, so systems that use these approaches are faced with problems. These problems arise because of the lack of a serious constant and repeated changes in the software process. To overcome this it is necessary to create an infrastructure. Hence, a service oriented approach for configuration management is presented in this paper. In this approach, the activities of configuration management are conducted from a service oriented viewpoint. This approach was also used to try and control the evolution and number of versions of different software systems in order to identify, organize and control change and reforms during the production process. This approach can compose services and create composite services for new undefined activities of configuration.
SERVICE ORIENTED CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT OF SOFTWARE ARCHITECTUREIJNSA Journal
Software configuration management (SCM) is an important activity in the software engineering life cycle. SCM by control of the evolution process of products leads to constancy and stability in software systems. Nowadays, use of software configuration management is essential during the process of software development as rules to control and manage the evolution of software systems. SCM effects different levels of abstraction included the architectural level. Configuration of software architecture causes improvement in the configuration of the lower abstraction levels. CM of software architecture is more significant in large scale software with longevity of life cycle. Traditional SCM approaches, at the architectural level, do not provided the necessary support to software configuration management, so systems that use these approaches are faced with problems. These problems arise because of the lack of a serious constant and repeated changes in the software process. To overcome this it is necessary to create an infrastructure. Hence, a service oriented approach for configuration management is presented in this paper. In this approach, the activities of configuration management are conducted from a service oriented viewpoint. This approach was also used to try and control the evolution and number of versions of different software systems in order to identify, organize and control change and reforms during the production process. This approach can compose services and create composite services for new undefined activities of configuration.
Similar to TOGAF 9 Guidelinesand Techniques Ver1 0 (20)
Open Digital Architecture (ODA) is a blueprint for modular, cloud-based, open digital platforms that can be orchestrated using AI.
Designed to support our industry into the cloud native era, ODA sets the framework required
for CSPs to invest in IT, transforming business agility and operations by creating simpler IT and network solutions that are easier and cheaper to deploy, integrate and upgrade. Enabling growth, profitability and a cutting-edge customer experience.
A simple Small to Medium Enterprise Cybersecurity approach with minimal cost for Enterprise `security Architecture implementation with technologies proposed
2. Applying Iteration to the ADM
Applying the ADM at different Enterprise
Levels
ADM Cycle Approaches
3.
4. Architecture Context iterations allow initial mobilization of architecture activity
by establishing the architecture approach, principles, scope, and vision.
Architecture Definition iterations allow the creation of
architecture content by cycling through Business, Information
Systems, and Technology Architecture phases. These iterations
also allow viability and feasibility tests to be carried out by looking
at opportunities and migration planning.
Architecture Governance iterations support governance
of change activity progressing towards a defined Target
Architecture.
Transition Planning iterations support the creation of for
mal change roadmaps for a defined architecture
5. Two process styles can be adopted within
the ADM for the definition of architectures:
◦ Baseline First: In this style, an assessment of the baseline (i.e., current
state) landscape is used to identify problem areas and improvement
opportunities. This process is suitable when a target solution is not clearly
understood and agreed upon.
◦ Target First: In this style, the target solution is elaborated in detail and
then mapped back to the baseline, in order to identify change activity.
This process is suitable when a target state is agreed at a high level and
where the enterprise wishes to avoid proliferating current business
practice into the target model.
6.
7.
8.
9. The enterprise must be
partitioned into different
areas, each of which can
be supported by
architectures (Subject
Matter, Time Period and
Level of Detail)
10.
11.
12. Key Benefits
1. It is lightweight, as multiple architectures can
be developed against a single Request for
Work, project plan, etc.
2. It allows for very close integration of
architectures at different levels in the
organization.
3. It works well when all architectures are being
developed by a single team.
Key Limitations
1. It does not explicitly set out governance and
change management relationships between
the different architectures.
2. It requires all architectures to be completed in
sequence and potentially released at the
same time. This may delay the release of
strategic architectures or prevent specific
Capability Architectures from being
developed.
3. Similar architectural activities are repeated
within a number of phases within the ADM. It
may become difficult to distinguish the
differences between different phases.
13. Key Benefits
1. It is comprehensive. All ADM activities are
carried out at all levels.
2. It establishes explicit governance
relationships between architectures.
3. It allows for federated development of
architectures at different levels in the
organization.
Key Limitations
1. It requires the establishment of an
enterprise-wide governance hierarchy to be
effective.
2. It does not work well when many
architectures are being developed by the
same team of architects.
14. TOGAF Version 9, The Open Group
Architecture Framework (TOGAF), 2009