T he Natur al
A ppr oach.
Stephen Krashen, Tracy Terrell (1981).In Jack C. Richards&Rodgers,
Theodore,CUP (2001)



                                   Prof. Estela N. Braun. Teacher Training
                                   Programme, Practice II, 2010. Human
                                   Sciences College, UNLPam.
Back in California:
  Terrell taught Spanish. Wished to apply
   naturalistic principles of SLA.
  Stephen Krashen, an applied linguist, built on
   the rationale. “The Natural Approach”(1983).
  Related their approach to the Natural or
   DIRECT Method.
  A)Use of language in communicative situations
   without recourse to the native language.
  B)Teaching without any reference to grammar.
  C) Textbook examples.
Approach :theory of
language.
  Naturalistic language learning in YLE.
  Emphasis on EXPOSURE, INPUT, rather
   than on practice.
  Central role of COMPREHENSION.
  COMMUNICATION as the primary
   function of language.
  Primacy of MEANING.
  Importance of VOCABULARY.
Main Tenets of the
Theory:
  1. The Acquisition/Learning Hypothesis.
  ACQUISITION is the natural way.
   Unconscious.Understanding language and
   using it for meaningful communication.
  LEARNING :process in which conscious rules
   about the language are developed.Requires
   formal teaching and does not lead to
   acquisition.
2. The Monitor
Hypothesis:
  Conscious learning can function as a
   monitor or editor that checks and repairs
   the output of the acquired system.
  3 Conditions to Monitor:
  1. Time.
  2.Focus on forms.
  3.Knowledge of rules.
3. The Natural order
Hypothesis.
  Based on SLA, Brown and other studies
   (1978).
  Certain grammatical structures or
   morphemes are acquired before others.
  Errors are signs of naturalistic
   developmental processes.
4. The INPUT
Hypothesis:
 People acquire language best by being
  exposed to input that is slightly above their
  current level of competence.
 i+1 formula.
 Clues based on situation,
  context,extralinguistic information, KOW, make
  comprehension possible.
 Caretaker speech, slower rate, repetition, use
  of Yes/No more than WH questions help to
  make the input more COMPREHENSIBLE.
5. The Affective Filter
Hypothesis
  Krashen considers the learner’s emotional
   state as a FILTER that passes, impedes or
   blocks the INPUT necessary to acquisition.
  3 kinds of affective or attitudinal variables:
 o Motivation.
 o Self-confidence.
 o Anxiety (fear of emabarrassment, etc.)
Implications for ELT
 Provide lots of comprehensible input.
 Use visual aids to help the acquisition of
  vocabulary.
 The focus in the classroom should be on
  reading and listening;speaking should be
  allowed to “Emerge”. Silent Period.
 Lower the affective filter. Relaxed
  classroom atmosphere.
OBJECTIVES

 For beginner students up to Intermediate.
 What they can/won’t be able to do (Page
  184)
 THE SYLLABUS:
 BICs.
 CALP.
TECHNIQUES:

TPR (James Asher)
Mime, gesture, use of context.
Situation-based practice.
Group work activities.
Whatever minimizes learner’s anxiety
 and maximizes learner self-confidence.
LEARNER ROLES:
 Processor of comprehensible input.
 Learner decisions on when to speak, what to
  speak about, what linguistic expressions to
  use.
 Pre-production stage:participate in the
  language class without need to respond.
 Early production stage:respond to familiar
  questions,fixed conversation.
 Speech-emergent phase:role-play, games,
  personal info and opinions, group problem-
  solving.
TEACHER ROLES:

 1.Teacher is primary source of
  comprehensible input.
 2. Teacher creates a classroom
  atmosphere that is interesting and
  friendly to lower the affective filter.
 3. Teacher chooses a rich mix of
  classroom activities.
ROLE OF
INSTRUCTIONAL
MATERIALS:
 Realia more than textbooks.
 Visual aids.
 Brochures, maps, advertisements,
  menus, shedules.
 Syllabus of topics and situations.
 PROCEDURE:
 Mainly TPR.
CONCLUSION

 The Natural Approach rejects the formal
  grammatical organization of language to
  teach it.It is not used at a native level.
 It emphasizes comprehensible and
  meaningful practice activities , rather
  than production of grammatically perfect
  utterances and sentences.

The natural approach

  • 1.
    T he Natural A ppr oach. Stephen Krashen, Tracy Terrell (1981).In Jack C. Richards&Rodgers, Theodore,CUP (2001) Prof. Estela N. Braun. Teacher Training Programme, Practice II, 2010. Human Sciences College, UNLPam.
  • 2.
    Back in California:  Terrell taught Spanish. Wished to apply naturalistic principles of SLA.  Stephen Krashen, an applied linguist, built on the rationale. “The Natural Approach”(1983).  Related their approach to the Natural or DIRECT Method.  A)Use of language in communicative situations without recourse to the native language.  B)Teaching without any reference to grammar.  C) Textbook examples.
  • 3.
    Approach :theory of language.  Naturalistic language learning in YLE.  Emphasis on EXPOSURE, INPUT, rather than on practice.  Central role of COMPREHENSION.  COMMUNICATION as the primary function of language.  Primacy of MEANING.  Importance of VOCABULARY.
  • 4.
    Main Tenets ofthe Theory:  1. The Acquisition/Learning Hypothesis.  ACQUISITION is the natural way. Unconscious.Understanding language and using it for meaningful communication.  LEARNING :process in which conscious rules about the language are developed.Requires formal teaching and does not lead to acquisition.
  • 5.
    2. The Monitor Hypothesis:  Conscious learning can function as a monitor or editor that checks and repairs the output of the acquired system.  3 Conditions to Monitor:  1. Time.  2.Focus on forms.  3.Knowledge of rules.
  • 6.
    3. The Naturalorder Hypothesis.  Based on SLA, Brown and other studies (1978).  Certain grammatical structures or morphemes are acquired before others.  Errors are signs of naturalistic developmental processes.
  • 7.
    4. The INPUT Hypothesis: People acquire language best by being exposed to input that is slightly above their current level of competence.  i+1 formula.  Clues based on situation, context,extralinguistic information, KOW, make comprehension possible.  Caretaker speech, slower rate, repetition, use of Yes/No more than WH questions help to make the input more COMPREHENSIBLE.
  • 8.
    5. The AffectiveFilter Hypothesis  Krashen considers the learner’s emotional state as a FILTER that passes, impedes or blocks the INPUT necessary to acquisition.  3 kinds of affective or attitudinal variables: o Motivation. o Self-confidence. o Anxiety (fear of emabarrassment, etc.)
  • 9.
    Implications for ELT Provide lots of comprehensible input. Use visual aids to help the acquisition of vocabulary. The focus in the classroom should be on reading and listening;speaking should be allowed to “Emerge”. Silent Period. Lower the affective filter. Relaxed classroom atmosphere.
  • 10.
    OBJECTIVES  For beginnerstudents up to Intermediate.  What they can/won’t be able to do (Page 184)  THE SYLLABUS:  BICs.  CALP.
  • 11.
    TECHNIQUES: TPR (James Asher) Mime,gesture, use of context. Situation-based practice. Group work activities. Whatever minimizes learner’s anxiety and maximizes learner self-confidence.
  • 12.
    LEARNER ROLES:  Processorof comprehensible input.  Learner decisions on when to speak, what to speak about, what linguistic expressions to use.  Pre-production stage:participate in the language class without need to respond.  Early production stage:respond to familiar questions,fixed conversation.  Speech-emergent phase:role-play, games, personal info and opinions, group problem- solving.
  • 13.
    TEACHER ROLES:  1.Teacheris primary source of comprehensible input.  2. Teacher creates a classroom atmosphere that is interesting and friendly to lower the affective filter.  3. Teacher chooses a rich mix of classroom activities.
  • 14.
    ROLE OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS:  Realiamore than textbooks.  Visual aids.  Brochures, maps, advertisements, menus, shedules.  Syllabus of topics and situations.  PROCEDURE:  Mainly TPR.
  • 15.
    CONCLUSION  The NaturalApproach rejects the formal grammatical organization of language to teach it.It is not used at a native level.  It emphasizes comprehensible and meaningful practice activities , rather than production of grammatically perfect utterances and sentences.