This presentation was given by Afrina Choudhury (World Fish), as part of the Annual Scientific Conference hosted by the CGIAR Collaborative Platform for Gender Research. The event took place on 5-6 December 2017 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, where the Platform is hosted (by KIT Royal Tropical Institute).
Read more: http://gender.cgiar.org/gender_events/annual-scientific-conference-capacity-development-workshop-cgiar-collaborative-platform-gender-research/
young call girls in Janakpuri🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
Testing a gender transformative approach combined with a fish harvesting technology for women
1. Testing a gender
transformative approach combined with a fish
harvesting
technology for women
CGIAR Collaborative Platform for Gender Research, 1st Annual Scientific Conference
6 December 2017
Afrina Choudhury, Fayzur Rahman, Cynthia McDougall, Froukje Kruissen, Julie Newton
2. • Under USAID-funded Aquaculture for Income and
Nutrition (AIN) project in 18 villages in Barisal region,
Southwest Bangladesh
• AIN engages with women to promote
carp/tilapia+mola polyculture in homestead ponds
• Mola is rich in micronutrients
• Women don’t usually catch fish (socio-cultural &
technical reasons); rely on men
• Women find it difficult to catch mola (eg: nets not
suitable for them or nets are not suitable to catch
these small fish with)
Background
3. Project focus
• Piloted fish harvesting technology designed for
women to enable frequent harvesting of nutrient-
rich mola from homestead ponds
• Piloted social consciousness raising exercise to
reduce normative barriers to women at
household level
• Piloted community level social consciousness
raising exercises to reduce normative barriers at
community level
4. Interventions: Technical and Social
∅
∅ ∅
GT 69 CGTA 251HGTA
86
Gill net training (GT): n=155
Gender transformative strategies
− HH GTA Pilot (HGTA): n=86
− Community GTA pilot (CGTA): n=337
5. Research Question:
Overarching: What is the impact of combining a
multi-scale gender transformative approach
together with a women-targeted technology (i.e.
gill net) on women’s empowerment and on
technology adoption?
Intersectional dimensions: age, wealth status,
marital status, years of marriage
6. We define empowerment as the expansion of choice and strengthening of voice
through the transformation of power relations so women involved in gill-net technology
have more control over their lives and futures. The indicators for empowerment chosen
for analysis cover different dimensions of the GATES conceptual model of women’s
empowerment related to agency, resources and institutional structures
We define technology adoption as: the decision to apply an innovation and to continue
using it (Rogers and Shoemaker, 1971). The indicators for adoption defined according
to the domains of technology uptake, technology outcome, benefits distribution,
influencing and enabling factors of uptake.
7. Study on empowerment impacts (ES): Baseline and
endline that survey women farmers and their husband’s
n=144 HH (women with spouse in some
sections), all who received aquaculture training:
- Treatment:
86 with nets + HH GTA
- Control
58 nets only;
Attitude Survey (AS): Before & after gender attitude
surveys with community
n= 458 men and women from 18 villages
- Treatment, n=251, Control, n=207
Consumption Study (CS) : Assessing weekly
adoption and impact on consumption
n= 161 women respondents
- Treatment, n= 95
- Control, n=66
59 85
76
Evaluating gender
Change
AS
CS
ES
458
8. Main evaluation tools (Adapted WEAI, WEFI and
gender scales)
Elements of
Empowerment (GATES
conceptual model)
Dimensions Empowerment +Attitude
Survey
Resources Critical consciousness Self-efficacy
Self-confidence
Assets Land & ponds
Credit
Time allocation
Institutional Structure Family, Community Gendered perceptions
Mobility
Agency Decision making Decision making
Leadership Leadership
Collective action Group membership
11. Multi-scale GTA approach used
NGOs, local
institutions,
govt.
Community
members
Household of
adopter
Woman
adopter
At the household level, tools used
include ‘hopes & fears’, demonstrating
and building trust, ‘power hierarchies’,
access to nutrition, obstacles to change,
‘who decides’, and exploring gendered
behavior.
At the community level, tools used
include ‘hopes & fears’, ‘looking at our
attitudes’, ‘acting like a man/woman’,
‘how will we empower each other’,
gender equality solutions, ‘the man box’
(masculinities) and a historical timeline of
gender changes.
12. Promundo Nurturing Connections
Theory of change: Changes focused on:
Gender transformation takes place
through women and mean
1. Learning through questioning and
critical reflection on gender norms to
develop new attitudes and skills
2. Rehearse equitable and non-violent
attitudes and behaviours in a
comfortable space
3. Internalize new gender attitudes and
norm and apply these through their
own relationships and lives
Theory of change: Changes focused on:
Gender transformation takes place through:
1. Behaviour change is a process that
requires internalizing of new concepts
2. Gender norms are driven by
community norms and group dynamics
3. Adults learn best through action and
experience.
13.
14. Preliminary findings: Bangladesh
• GTA integration has helped explore and
address the social and gender attitudes and
beliefs that prescribe women’s roles
• Technologies conducive for women +GTA
strategies can prompt independent
involvement and decision making
• Women report the positive influence the
involvement of their spouse, family and
community members had on their adoption
• Data show positive change in empowerment
outcomes especially aquaculture-related
decision making, consumption, gender
attitudes and self-efficacy
Only men have valuable knowledge and experience needed for
managing aquaculture resources
Either a man or a women could successfully operate or manage a fish pond
0
20
40
60
80
Baseline Endline Baseline Endline
Intervention Control
Percent
Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree
0
20
40
60
Baseline Endline Baseline Endline
Intervention Control
Percent
Strongly agree Partially agree Disagree
only 17 gm (6-7 large size(2.8-3.1 cm) mola can meet the recommended Vitamin A content for under-5 child as well as Contribute 22, 8, 5, and 5 % of recommended intake of Calcium, Iron Zink, and protein respectively (Kataki & Babu, 2002)
An annual production of 10kg/pond in estimated 4 million small seasonal ponds is enough for meeting the annual dietary Vitamin A requirement of 6 million children
Time period: 1 year
i.e. to develop an understanding of which empowerment domains lead to greater technology adoption (demand articulation) and which domains of empowerment does technology adoption enhance, what are the positive and negative trade-offs between different empowerment domains). This would include an analysis of what factors explain the different outcomes across the different groups (control + treatment).
Scales used include GEM (Gender equitable Men) scale, Gender Norms attitude scale, Gender Relations Scale, WEFI, (http://gender.care2share.wikispaces.net/file/view/C-Change_Gender_Scales_Compendium.pdf )
WEAI indicators include gendred perceptions, leadership, group membership, decision making, nutrition, credit, extension, time use.we also used Rosenberg’s self esteem scale to analyse power within
Simple random sampling method
The study aims to assess the effectiveness of women’s use of the mola gill net on the frequency of mola consumption
Average nearly double the mola consumption in experiment group(N=95) than the control group(N=66)
87% frequency of usage by women
14% did not adopt because society does not see it positively
57% of the time women did not use was becase they did not have time
These exercises helped address power within ,power to and power with
HKI’s Nurturing Connections
Promoting gender-transformative change with men and boys by Promundo and AAS
Engaging Men and Boys in Gender Transformation by Promundo, USAID & others (page-69)
Gender awareness and development by UNDP (page-48)
Gender Sensitivity by UNESCO (page-57)
Gender Analysis and Awareness Course by BRAC (page-27)
We try to involve or target women but women do not use the technologies in a vacuum – without influences from other actors and institutions.
Reducing technology adoption gap between men and women by specifically targeting women
Technologies cannot be 'delivered' in a gender-neutral way because their impacts will not be gender-neutral; the operating environment is shaped a priori by gender relations (Manfre et al. 2012; Ragasa et al. 2012; Farnworth, 2010).
Therefore, on the technology side, ignoring the social context may limit the benefits of an intervention, as barriers to adoption or to benefiting from adoption among marginalized groups are not addressed
(14% women did not adopt the net because society will not see it positively)
The GAS reliability analysis indicates the Cronbanch’s alpha for gender inequality is 0.784 and Cronbanch’s alpha for equality is 0.741.
GAS study respondents were 458 (including 251 as Intervention and 207 as control) from 18 gill net villages. For GAS out of the 458, 186 respondents were women and 272 respondents were men. [[Indicate that will disaggregate analysis by gender]]