Download to read offline
Uploaded byJari Laru
Teknologiatuettu oppiminen ja opetus - luento asiantuntijafoorumissa
The document discusses the integration of technology in education, highlighting the importance of technology-supported learning and various educational tools. It references numerous studies and resources related to Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), student retention, and the evolving landscape of educational methodologies. Additionally, it touches on educational strategies and the necessity for adaptive learning environments to enhance teaching effectiveness.
More Related Content
Similar to Teknologiatuettu oppiminen ja opetus - luento asiantuntijafoorumissa
Teknologiatuettu oppiminen ja opetus - luento asiantuntijafoorumissa
- 1. Teknologiatuettu oppiminen ja opetus JariLaru, KT, yliopistonlehtori, teknologiatuettu oppiminen ja opetus, Oulun KTK,yliopisto Pohjois-Pohjanmaan liiton asiantuntijafoorumi 1/2017 KEHITTYVÄ KOULUYMPÄRISTÖ
- 2.
- 3.
- 4. Koivisto & Laru(submitted, 2016). Redesigning activities and Minecraft world of afterschool code club for learning computational thinking and 21st century skills
- 6.
- 7.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 15.
- 16. Teknologiatuettu oppiminen eiole hopealuoti
- 17. Laru, J., Näykki,P. & Järvelä, S. (2015). Four stages of research on the educational use of ubiquitous computing. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 11/2015 •GARTNER 2016: •On the RiseBlockchain in Education •Tin Can API •Li-Fi •Smart Machine Education Applications •Virtual Reality/Augmented Reality Applications in Education •Bluetooth Beacons •Robotic Telepresence •Exostructure Strategy •MOOC Platforms •Classroom 3D Printing •Affective Computing •https://www.gartner.com/doc/ 3364119/hype-cycle- education-
- 18. MOOC vs. SOOC vs. Flipped Classroom • Assessment, P.I. N. (2012). Research & practice in assessment, (March 2012), 5–15. Balakrishnan, G., & Coetzee, D. (2013). Predicting Student Retention in Massive Open Online Courses using Hidden Markov Models. EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2013/EECS-2013- 109.pdf Belanger, Y., & Thornton, J. (2013). Bioelectricity: A quantitative approach. Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach, 1–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-48865-3 Berge, Z. L., & Huang, Y. (2004). Volume 13 – Issue 5 May 2004. Deosnews, 13(5). Retrieved from http://www.ed.psu.edu/acsde/deos/deosnews/deosarchives.asp Christine, W., Roe, B., & Paterson, B. L. (2007). Coming Out as Ill: Understanding Self-Disclosure in Chronic Illness from a Meta- Synthesis of Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470692127.ch7 Cormier, D., & Siemens, G. (2010). “Through the Open Door: Open Courses as Research, Learning, and Engagement.” Educause Review, 45(4), 30–39. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume45/ThroughtheOpenDoorOpenCoursesa/209320 Halawa, S., Greene, D., & Mitchell, J. (2014). Dropout Prediction in MOOCs using Learner Activity Features. eLearning Papers, 37(March), 1–10. Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/In_depth_37_1 (1).pdf Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001 Hone, K. S., & El Said, G. R. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting MOOC retention: A survey study. Computers and Education, 98, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.016 Kerka, S. (1988). Strategies for retaining adult students: the educationally disadvantaged. ERIC Digest, No. 76.(76), 76. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED299455&ERICExtSe arch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED299455 Khalil, H., & Ebner, M. (2014). MOOCs Completion Rates and Possible Methods to Improve Retention - A Literature Review. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, 2014(1), 1305–1313. Retrieved from /p/147656/ Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing Disengagement : Analyzing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses. Lak ’13, 10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460296.2460330 Koller, D., Ng, A., Do, C., & Chen, Z. (2013). “Retention and Intention in Massive Open Online Courses” (New Horizons). Educause Review, 62–63. Larry, H. (2012). Lessons learned from MITx’s prototype course. Retrieved December 13, 2014, from http://news.mit.edu/2012/mitx- edx-first-course-recap-0716 Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y MEYER, R. (n.d.). What It’s Like to Teach a MOOC (and What the Heck’s a MOOC?). Retrieved December 13, 2016, from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/what-its-like-to-teach-a-mooc-and-what-the-hecks-a-mooc/260000/ Paterson, B., & Dubouloz, C. (2009). Conducting qualitative metasynthesis research: Insights from a metasynthesis project. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 22–33. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Conducting+Qualitative+Metasynthesis+Research+:+Insights+from +a+Metasynthesis+Project#0%5Cnhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Conducting+Qualitative+Metasy nthesis+Resea Xiong, Y., Li, H., Kornhaber, M. L., Suen, H. K., Pursel, B., & Goins, D. D. (2015). Examining the Relations among Student Motivation, Engagement, and Retention in a MOOC: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Global Education Review, 2(3), 23–33. Retrieved from http://ger.mercy.edu/index.php/ger/article/view/124 Yang, D., Sinha, T., & Adamson, D. (2013). “Turn on, Tune in, Drop out”: Anticipating student dropouts in Massive Open Online Courses. Proceedings of the NIPS Workshop on Data Driven Education, 1–8. Retrieved from http://lytics.stanford.edu/datadriveneducation/papers/yangetal.pdf Yuan, B. L., Powell, S., Yuan, L., Powell, S., & Cetis, J. (2013). MOOCs and Open Education : Implications for Higher Education A w hite p aper. Zheng, S., Rosson, M. B., Shih, P. C., & Carroll, J. M. (2015). Understanding Student Motivation, Behaviors and Perceptions in MOOCs. CSCW ’15: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1882–1895.
- 19. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk7ExsojYgI&list=UUXiKgucoUVd47d PnUrMtrPg Itsesäätely ym. taidotova ERITTÄIN tärkeitä teknologiatuetun oppimisen kontekstissa
- 20.
- 21.
- 24.
- 25. SLAM - Strategicregulation of learning through Learning Analytics and Mobile clouds for individual and collaborative learning success http://www.slamproject.org/blog
- 26.
Editor's Notes
- #18 Personal, portable and wirelessly networked technologies are now ubiquitous. However, more pedagogically grounded instructional design is needed (Laru, Näykki & Järvelä, 2015) potential role of tools and appropriate instructional design for guiding and supporting learning processes has been virtually ignored (Järvelä & Hadwin, 2013).