An Exploratory Study for the Deployment of a Techno-pedagogical Staff Learning EnvironmentLaurent Moccozet, Omar Benkacem, BinetaNdiaye, VjollcaAhmeti, Patrick Roth, Pierre-Yves Burgi, University of Geneva, Switzerland
PlanContextMotivationsExploratorystudyStudyresultsImplementationFurtherdevelopmentsConclusion
ContextHow to introduce and implement PLE at an institution level such as the University of Geneva ?Various audiences (students,  teaching staff, administrative and technical staff)A range of available e-learning systems (2 LMSs, CMS, Blog, Mediaserver, Portal my.unige, etc…)
MotivationLots of sound objectives: Encourage and develop learners autonomy in an institutional context.Provide an integrated access to formal and informal resources.Facilitate the development of collaborative learning networks among learners.But where are we starting from:	 What are the current practices ?Don’t change practices, make them evolve
ExploratorystudyThree action linesQuantitative survey14000 students asked about their IT and Web 2.0 practices (from which 1400 answered). <1>Data collect and processingQualitative surveyInterviews with 7 members of the boards of students associations from different faculties. <2>Interviews with 10 teachers and techno-pedagogical experts. <3>
StudyResultsLocal resources:Personal resources (mainly available from the student’s personal equipments – laptop, smartphone, desktop…).Institutional resources:Resources available from the institution (mainly LMSs).External (cloud) resources:Resources  available from the Web 2.0 ecosystem.
Studyresults
StudyresultsEquipment ? Definitely not a problem !Students are not proactive with web 2.0 resources and tools usage (no particular interest to “discover”).opportunistic with their usages of Web 2.0 resources and tools. usages are mainly evolving according to the evolution of the environment they know (ex : Facebook, google …)having informal learning/training usages of the Web 2.0 resources and tools (but they don’t know)
StudyresultsDoctoral students are identified as a potential “early adopters” audience for a PLE.Doctoral students are the one that are the more interested in accessing “external” resources.
ImplementationA global approach:Pedagogical axis associates technology watch, awareness and training.Technological axis introduces the PLE as a “pedagogical dashboard” to aggregate IT resources.
Implementation
Pedagogical axisAwareness       Dedicated blogWatch: Introduction of a collaborative tool for evaluating and sharing resources Training:Soft skills seminars for PhD students (digital & information literacy) Dedicated training modules (based on activities) Experimenting dashboard in pilot classes
Technological axisPedagogical dashboard :A «hub», a single entry point to access/manage formal and informal resources.Evolutive environment:Pre-integrated resources (no requirement to discover…)Open to new resources (… but you if you want/can anyway)
Technological axisGraaasp
Technological axis
Further developmentsExtend PLE with/to other institutions:Lausanne Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EuropeanprojectROLE) University of Fribourg University of LausanneUniversity of ZurichSWITCH members
ConclusionDesign and build an accurate global environment to stimulate new models of learning.
Your questions

Techno Pedagogical Staff Learning Environment

  • 1.
    An Exploratory Studyfor the Deployment of a Techno-pedagogical Staff Learning EnvironmentLaurent Moccozet, Omar Benkacem, BinetaNdiaye, VjollcaAhmeti, Patrick Roth, Pierre-Yves Burgi, University of Geneva, Switzerland
  • 2.
  • 3.
    ContextHow to introduceand implement PLE at an institution level such as the University of Geneva ?Various audiences (students, teaching staff, administrative and technical staff)A range of available e-learning systems (2 LMSs, CMS, Blog, Mediaserver, Portal my.unige, etc…)
  • 4.
    MotivationLots of soundobjectives: Encourage and develop learners autonomy in an institutional context.Provide an integrated access to formal and informal resources.Facilitate the development of collaborative learning networks among learners.But where are we starting from:  What are the current practices ?Don’t change practices, make them evolve
  • 5.
    ExploratorystudyThree action linesQuantitativesurvey14000 students asked about their IT and Web 2.0 practices (from which 1400 answered). <1>Data collect and processingQualitative surveyInterviews with 7 members of the boards of students associations from different faculties. <2>Interviews with 10 teachers and techno-pedagogical experts. <3>
  • 6.
    StudyResultsLocal resources:Personal resources(mainly available from the student’s personal equipments – laptop, smartphone, desktop…).Institutional resources:Resources available from the institution (mainly LMSs).External (cloud) resources:Resources available from the Web 2.0 ecosystem.
  • 7.
  • 8.
    StudyresultsEquipment ? Definitelynot a problem !Students are not proactive with web 2.0 resources and tools usage (no particular interest to “discover”).opportunistic with their usages of Web 2.0 resources and tools. usages are mainly evolving according to the evolution of the environment they know (ex : Facebook, google …)having informal learning/training usages of the Web 2.0 resources and tools (but they don’t know)
  • 9.
    StudyresultsDoctoral students areidentified as a potential “early adopters” audience for a PLE.Doctoral students are the one that are the more interested in accessing “external” resources.
  • 10.
    ImplementationA global approach:Pedagogicalaxis associates technology watch, awareness and training.Technological axis introduces the PLE as a “pedagogical dashboard” to aggregate IT resources.
  • 11.
  • 12.
    Pedagogical axisAwareness  Dedicated blogWatch: Introduction of a collaborative tool for evaluating and sharing resources Training:Soft skills seminars for PhD students (digital & information literacy) Dedicated training modules (based on activities) Experimenting dashboard in pilot classes
  • 13.
    Technological axisPedagogical dashboard:A «hub», a single entry point to access/manage formal and informal resources.Evolutive environment:Pre-integrated resources (no requirement to discover…)Open to new resources (… but you if you want/can anyway)
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
    Further developmentsExtend PLEwith/to other institutions:Lausanne Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EuropeanprojectROLE) University of Fribourg University of LausanneUniversity of ZurichSWITCH members
  • 17.
    ConclusionDesign and buildan accurate global environment to stimulate new models of learning.
  • 18.