SYSTEMS THEORY
incorporating Unitary Approaches,
Family Systems, Institutional
Systems, Ecological Models and
Networking
SYSTEMS THEORY
 What is Systems Theory?
 Biological Models
 A Case Study
 The Pincus and Minahan model
 Social Work and Ecology
 Strengths and Weaknesses
An Example
 Think of Lincoln’s transport system: if you
improve car access, you potentially boost the
economy, you satisfy individual demand, but
potentially damage the environment and
increase risks of accidents; if you switch to
public transport, you boost jobs through
infrastructural spending, but you lose income
from car parking, from passing trade,
potentially from tourism…….so any action in
one part has a consequence on the whole
system
Another Example
• Excluding your family and blood
relatives, how many friends and
acquaintances do you have?
• Write down the number that
best approximates to your
social system
Further Examples




Examples of simple systems are babysitting
circles, allotment societies, “share – the
care” schemes
Examples of complex systems are
neighbourhoods, families, kinship networks,
church / faith groups, peer groups, social
communities
SYSTEMS THEORY: A Definition
“A Social system is a system of processes
of interaction between actors……...it is the
structure of the relations between the
actors as involved in the interactive
process which is essentially the structure
of the social system. The system is a
network of such relationships”
(Talcott Parsons: The Social System)
SYSTEMS THEORY: Roots
“Things do not have a meaning in
themselves, but only in relation to other
things” (Saying from Eastern philosophy)
 Society is “an organism of functionally
interdependent parts evolving through
structural differentiation” (Herbert
Spencer: The Study of Sociology)

BIOLOGICAL MODELS
The whole is equal to more than the
sum of its parts
Systems are highly organised
Boundaries are very important, as are
patterned transactions
The behaviour of the individual cannot
be understood without reference to the
system to which s/he belongs
BIOLOGICAL MODELS (2)
Behaviour is best understood as a
circular process
 Systems are naturally self preservationist and conservative
 Systems need energy flow across
boundaries to achieve equilibrium
 Systems are goal directed

Practice Example of Simple Use of Systems Theory –
as an Explanatory Framework – School Refusal

Parents pleased
by D’s help.
David feels
safe at home

David picks
up anxieties.
Wants to
comfort Mum &
cheer up
Dad

David
refuses
to go to
school

Dad guilty
Mum unhappy
Money focus
makes him
feel useless
Anxiety
Attacks – angina
gets worse

Mum worries
about her
Health, but
cannot discuss.
Worries about
money problems
Reminder – how would other theories
intervene in this case?
1.
2.

3.
4.

Psychodynamic – would try to engage
with David’s inner world of feelings
Behavioural – identify and try to isolate
those factors positively reinforcing
David’s school refusal
Cognitive – what do you think?
Systems – as implied earlier – may use
any one of above………BUT would also:
Systems Theory Intervention in David’s Case







Enquire into the way the actions of each family member
impact on the others – see diagram – slide 7
Encourage parents to go to school regularly to see teachers
about David’s progress
Enquire about possible bullying at school & the nature of the
ant-bullying policies
Make sure that the health care system is aware of the
emotional aspects of D’s father’s health problems
Establish whether there were other forms of support available
to D’s parents
Ensure the parents were aware of all potential benefits
available to them
In this sense then Systems Theory is making sure that the
‘problem’ is perceived in the round and in an inter-connected
manner……..simple good practice – you might think!
HUMANS AND SYSTEMS
All people depend upon human systems:
 INFORMAL: family; friends;
neighbourhoods
 FORMAL: church; clubs; associations;
trade unions
 SOCIETAL: school; employer; authorities;
state structures
(Pincus and Minahan, 1973)

Pincus & Minahan’s 4 basic social work
systems
System

Description

Change Agent
System

Social workers & the
organisations they work in

Further
Information

Not just social workers!

People, groups, families,
communities who seek help
& engage with change
agents

Actual clients have agreed
to receive help & have
engaged themselves;
potential clients are those
with whom the sws are
trying to engage

Target
System

People whom the change
agent system is trying to
change to achieve its aims

Client and target systems
may or may not be the
same

Action
System

People with whom the
change agent system works
to achieve its aims

Client, target & action
systems may or may not be
the same

Client
System
Noel Timms’ three levels






MICRO: reference to interaction and
mutuality in personal peer relationships
MEZZO: access to resources, often
facilitated by central figures, informal
leaders
MACRO: relationship between people and
more formal community organisations
Linking Systems and Structural
Theory
 “Community social work demands a

systems orientation and a change of
attitude from social work about roles
and tasks” (Coulshed, 1988)
 Working with communities,
neighbourhoods and networks: a
systems approach to service delivery
Can Systems Theory be Critical?




Systems theory does allow social workers
to be critical of – and target for change considerable ‘issues’ outside the immediate
behaviour of the referral; including:
The referrer's immediate environment; their
own agency’s policies; other agencies; local
& national government policies; social
conventions generally
Linking Systems theory to Networking




a systems approach may be applied to the
analysis of “the complexity of biological,
psychological, social and cultural forces at work
in the relations between formal social work and
informal social support networks” (Garbarino,
1986: 24)
the aim is “to create artificial systems that will
go on to function as natural systems” (Collins
and Pancoast, 1976: 65)
Coates J (2003) Ecology & Social Work
Starts from the notion that SW must support sustainable
development, through:
 Developing caring communities
 Identifying & developing activities that benefit ‘the
common good’
 Promoting active partnerships
 Building capacities in individuals & communities
 Promoting decentralised & localised decision
making - & making it work!
 Promoting community health & social resilience
 Promoting environmental and social justice
 Reducing human & ecological stress – with much use
of grief work
 Focus on natural methods of healing & spirituality
So, it is logical that a radical and critical systems theory
would question all the conventional systems within
which SW is practiced - and promote alternatives
Strengths & Weaknesses of Systems Approach
as a Guide to Practice

Strengths







It offers a unitary approach by combining psychological,
social and community approaches
It is interactive – it facilitates being able to understand
the impact of people on each other, as well the impact of
systems on people & other systems
It offers more than one way to tackle an issue – eclectic
– not ‘stuck’ in one preferred approach
It allows for the integration of approaches
It avoids strict determinist accounts of behaviour
Weaknesses









It is not prescriptive – does not tell us what to do (some
might say that’s a strength!)
It is a generalised theory - hard to apply to specific
situations
It points to many connections but does not provide any
specific theory that might link them in an explanatory
manner
Maybe it includes too much – maybe we need theory that
places some emphasis on what is most important
In many guises it can be quite conservative – creating
stable self reliant systems
Similarly it may overstate the importance of social
cohesion and solidarity
It can have a complex and over technical language – like
many other theories!

Systems

  • 1.
    SYSTEMS THEORY incorporating UnitaryApproaches, Family Systems, Institutional Systems, Ecological Models and Networking
  • 2.
    SYSTEMS THEORY  Whatis Systems Theory?  Biological Models  A Case Study  The Pincus and Minahan model  Social Work and Ecology  Strengths and Weaknesses
  • 3.
    An Example  Thinkof Lincoln’s transport system: if you improve car access, you potentially boost the economy, you satisfy individual demand, but potentially damage the environment and increase risks of accidents; if you switch to public transport, you boost jobs through infrastructural spending, but you lose income from car parking, from passing trade, potentially from tourism…….so any action in one part has a consequence on the whole system
  • 4.
    Another Example • Excludingyour family and blood relatives, how many friends and acquaintances do you have? • Write down the number that best approximates to your social system
  • 5.
    Further Examples   Examples ofsimple systems are babysitting circles, allotment societies, “share – the care” schemes Examples of complex systems are neighbourhoods, families, kinship networks, church / faith groups, peer groups, social communities
  • 6.
    SYSTEMS THEORY: ADefinition “A Social system is a system of processes of interaction between actors……...it is the structure of the relations between the actors as involved in the interactive process which is essentially the structure of the social system. The system is a network of such relationships” (Talcott Parsons: The Social System)
  • 7.
    SYSTEMS THEORY: Roots “Thingsdo not have a meaning in themselves, but only in relation to other things” (Saying from Eastern philosophy)  Society is “an organism of functionally interdependent parts evolving through structural differentiation” (Herbert Spencer: The Study of Sociology) 
  • 8.
    BIOLOGICAL MODELS The wholeis equal to more than the sum of its parts Systems are highly organised Boundaries are very important, as are patterned transactions The behaviour of the individual cannot be understood without reference to the system to which s/he belongs
  • 9.
    BIOLOGICAL MODELS (2) Behaviouris best understood as a circular process  Systems are naturally self preservationist and conservative  Systems need energy flow across boundaries to achieve equilibrium  Systems are goal directed 
  • 10.
    Practice Example ofSimple Use of Systems Theory – as an Explanatory Framework – School Refusal Parents pleased by D’s help. David feels safe at home David picks up anxieties. Wants to comfort Mum & cheer up Dad David refuses to go to school Dad guilty Mum unhappy Money focus makes him feel useless Anxiety Attacks – angina gets worse Mum worries about her Health, but cannot discuss. Worries about money problems
  • 11.
    Reminder – howwould other theories intervene in this case? 1. 2. 3. 4. Psychodynamic – would try to engage with David’s inner world of feelings Behavioural – identify and try to isolate those factors positively reinforcing David’s school refusal Cognitive – what do you think? Systems – as implied earlier – may use any one of above………BUT would also:
  • 12.
    Systems Theory Interventionin David’s Case       Enquire into the way the actions of each family member impact on the others – see diagram – slide 7 Encourage parents to go to school regularly to see teachers about David’s progress Enquire about possible bullying at school & the nature of the ant-bullying policies Make sure that the health care system is aware of the emotional aspects of D’s father’s health problems Establish whether there were other forms of support available to D’s parents Ensure the parents were aware of all potential benefits available to them In this sense then Systems Theory is making sure that the ‘problem’ is perceived in the round and in an inter-connected manner……..simple good practice – you might think!
  • 13.
    HUMANS AND SYSTEMS Allpeople depend upon human systems:  INFORMAL: family; friends; neighbourhoods  FORMAL: church; clubs; associations; trade unions  SOCIETAL: school; employer; authorities; state structures (Pincus and Minahan, 1973) 
  • 14.
    Pincus & Minahan’s4 basic social work systems System Description Change Agent System Social workers & the organisations they work in Further Information Not just social workers! People, groups, families, communities who seek help & engage with change agents Actual clients have agreed to receive help & have engaged themselves; potential clients are those with whom the sws are trying to engage Target System People whom the change agent system is trying to change to achieve its aims Client and target systems may or may not be the same Action System People with whom the change agent system works to achieve its aims Client, target & action systems may or may not be the same Client System
  • 15.
    Noel Timms’ threelevels    MICRO: reference to interaction and mutuality in personal peer relationships MEZZO: access to resources, often facilitated by central figures, informal leaders MACRO: relationship between people and more formal community organisations
  • 16.
    Linking Systems andStructural Theory  “Community social work demands a systems orientation and a change of attitude from social work about roles and tasks” (Coulshed, 1988)  Working with communities, neighbourhoods and networks: a systems approach to service delivery
  • 17.
    Can Systems Theorybe Critical?   Systems theory does allow social workers to be critical of – and target for change considerable ‘issues’ outside the immediate behaviour of the referral; including: The referrer's immediate environment; their own agency’s policies; other agencies; local & national government policies; social conventions generally
  • 18.
    Linking Systems theoryto Networking   a systems approach may be applied to the analysis of “the complexity of biological, psychological, social and cultural forces at work in the relations between formal social work and informal social support networks” (Garbarino, 1986: 24) the aim is “to create artificial systems that will go on to function as natural systems” (Collins and Pancoast, 1976: 65)
  • 19.
    Coates J (2003)Ecology & Social Work Starts from the notion that SW must support sustainable development, through:  Developing caring communities  Identifying & developing activities that benefit ‘the common good’  Promoting active partnerships  Building capacities in individuals & communities  Promoting decentralised & localised decision making - & making it work!  Promoting community health & social resilience  Promoting environmental and social justice  Reducing human & ecological stress – with much use of grief work  Focus on natural methods of healing & spirituality So, it is logical that a radical and critical systems theory would question all the conventional systems within which SW is practiced - and promote alternatives
  • 20.
    Strengths & Weaknessesof Systems Approach as a Guide to Practice Strengths      It offers a unitary approach by combining psychological, social and community approaches It is interactive – it facilitates being able to understand the impact of people on each other, as well the impact of systems on people & other systems It offers more than one way to tackle an issue – eclectic – not ‘stuck’ in one preferred approach It allows for the integration of approaches It avoids strict determinist accounts of behaviour
  • 21.
    Weaknesses        It is notprescriptive – does not tell us what to do (some might say that’s a strength!) It is a generalised theory - hard to apply to specific situations It points to many connections but does not provide any specific theory that might link them in an explanatory manner Maybe it includes too much – maybe we need theory that places some emphasis on what is most important In many guises it can be quite conservative – creating stable self reliant systems Similarly it may overstate the importance of social cohesion and solidarity It can have a complex and over technical language – like many other theories!