An online survey experiment was conducted in which hypothetical candidates with varying gender, biographical information, and policy positions on issues were presented to respondents. The experiment found that respondents did not distinguish between male and female candidates with similar policy positions, and primarily based their evaluation on how much they agreed with the candidates' presented policy positions rather than gender. The study also found that female candidates could overcome issues of competence stereotypes by highlighting their specific policy positions. This illustrates that the availability of information about candidates' policy positions is more influential for voters than gender cues alone.