MAP Results Analysis K-11th

Summative Assessments
» Measures of Academic Progress – since Winter 2009
(3rd – 11th)
» MAP for Primary Grades – since Spring 2013 (K-2nd)
» Stanford Achievement Test Series, Tenth Edition –
Winter 2014 (3rd – 11th)
» Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) –
mandatory for 10th-11th since Fall 2011
» National Mandated Exams (Pruebas Nacionales) –
8th and 12th
» Midterm and Final Exams – 3rd – 12th

Spring 2014 MAP test results indicate
» The area of Language as the highest performance with a
58% of the students from 3rd – 11th being at or above the
2011 normative.
» The area of Mathematics shows the lowest performance
with a 42% of the students from 3rd – 11th being at or above
the 2011 normative.
Percentage of Students at or above the 2011 normative
54%
MAP Results 3rd - 11th
Spring 2014
42%
58%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Reading Math Language

Winter 2014 Stanford 10 test results indicate
» The area of Mathematics as the highest performance with
a 52% of the students from 3rd – 11th being at or above the
50th percentile.
» The area of Reading shows the lowest performance with a
28% of the students from 3rd – 11th being at or above the
50th percentile.
28%
Stanford 10 - Winter 2014
3rd - 11th
Percentage of Students At or Above
the 50th National Percentile
35%
52%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Reading Language Mathematics

Reading
» MAP Results:
• Overall results
• Classes with an
increasing trend
• Results per area
• Projection
comparison
» Stanford 10 results
» PSAT Results

41%
Percentage of Students at or above
46%
MAP (3rd - 11th)
Reading
the 2011 normative
50%
61%
54%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Spring 2010 Spring 2011 Spring 2012 Spring 2013 Spring 2014
We can observe an increasing trend from Spring 2010-2013 with a
slight slump in Spring 2014.

32%
42%
29%
37%
39%
58%
38%
12%
13%
19%
52%
52%
63%
50%
56%
16%
36%
50%
67%
68%
56%
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Class of 2017
Class of 2018
Class of 2019
Class of 2021
Class of 2023
Class of 2024
Class of 2025
MAP Results
Reading - Increasing trend
2014
2013
2012
2011

15%
31%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
MAP Primary Grades K-2nd
Reading
the 2011 normative
Spring 2013 Spring 2014
We can observe this group of students had a significant growth.

33%
the 2011 normative
42%
54%
44%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
MAP 3rd - 5th
Reading
Spring 2011 Spring 2012 Spring 2013 Spring 2014
We can observe an increasing trend from Spring 2011-2013 with a slight
slump in Spring 2014.

33%
MAP 6th - 8th
the 2011 normative
37%
57%
64%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Reading
An increasing trend from Spring 2011-2014 is evident in Middle School
Reading results.

76%
MAP 9th - 11th
Reading
the 2011 normative
73% 71%
58%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
We can observe a negative trend from Spring 2011- 2014.

16%
36%
50%
35%
52%
59%
68% 67%
56% 56%
62%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Class of
2025
Class of
2024
Class of
2023
Class of
2022
Class of
2021
Class of
2020
Class of
2019
Class of
2018
Class of
2017
Class of
2016
Class of
2015
MAP Results
Reading
Comparison of Actual and Projected Performance
Spring 2014 Projected Perfomance
Taking into account our measurable objectives and MAP test results, by spring 2014 our
overall level of performance should have been a 60% in the area of Reading. The classes
of 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016 have surpassed the growth projection
made from Spring 2012 results to Spring 2017 per class.

6% 8% 9%
23%
18%
52% 54%
29%
38%
43%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Class of
2024
Class of
2023
Class of
2022
Class of
2021
Class of
2020
Class of
2019
Class of
2018
Class of
2017
Class of
2016
Class of
2015
Reading
The classes of 2019 and 2018 demonstrated a strong performance in the
area of Reading.

PSAT – 10th and 11th
Critical Reading
Percentage of Students At or Above the 50th Percentile
26%
20%
32%
11%
24%
40%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Class of 2016 Class of 2015 Class of 2014 Class of 2013
2011
2012
2013
The class of 2015 shows the strongest performance in the area of
Critical Reading.

Language
» MAP Results:
• Overall results
• Classes with an
increasing trend
• Projection
comparison
» PSAT Results
» Midterm/Final Exams

Percentage of students at or above
52% 52%
MAP results (3rd - 11th)
Language
the 2011 normative
62%
59% 58%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
No significant growth can be observed.

44%
MAP results (3rd - 5th)
Language
the 2011 normative
53% 53% 54%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
We can observe an increasing trend from Spring 2011-2014.

48%
MAP results (6th - 8th)
the 2011 normative
54%
60% 61%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Language
Language results.

65%
MAP results (9th -11th)
the 2011 normative
79%
64% 62%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Language
High school results have consistently maintain performance with the
exception of an increase from Spring 2011-2012.

39%
51%
49%
49%
45%
38%
64%
57%
57%
59%
54%
59%
58%
47%
55%
50%
68%
55%
64%
66%
61%
53%
78%
64%
54%
59%
86%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Class of 2015
Class of 2016
Class of 2017
Class of 2018
Class of 2019
Class of 2020
Class of 2021
MAP Results
Language - Increasing trend
2014
2013
2012
2011

32%
78%
MAP Results
Language
64% 64%
54%
57% 59%
86%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Class of 2022 Class of 2021 Class of 2020 Class of 2019 Class of 2018 Class of 2017 Class of 2016 Class of 2015
Taking into account our measurable objectives and MAP test results, by spring
2014 our overall level of performance should have been a 65% in Language. The
classes of 2021, 2020, 2019, and 2015 have met or surpassed the growth
projection made from Spring 2012 results to Spring 2017 per class.

21%
25%
18%
50%
32%
44%
38%
43%
26%
67%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Class of
2024
Class of
2023
Class of
2022
Class of
2021
Class of
2020
Class of
2019
Class of
2018
Class of
2017
Class of
2016
Class of
2015
Language
Percent of Students At or Above
The classes of 2015 and 2021 demonstrated a strong performance in
the area of Language.

PSAT -10th and 11th
49%
47%
68%
38%
21%
Writing Skills
45%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
2011
2012
2013
The class of 2015 demonstrated a strong performance in 2012.

94%
74%
81%
75%
75%
75%
93%
60%
76%
86%
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
Grade Level
Midterm and Final Exam Average 2014
Language Arts
Percentage of Students at or above 80
The classes of 2014, 2021, and
2023 had the strongest
performance in Midterm and
Final exams.

Mathematics
» MAP Results:
• Overall results
• Classes with an
increasing trend
• Projection
comparison
» PSAT Results
» Midterm/Final Exams

38%
30%
MAP (3rd - 11th)
Mathematics
the 2011 normative
39%
45%
42%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
No significant growth can be observed.

MAP for Primary Grades (K - 2nd)
32%
41%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Mathematics
the 2011 normative
Spring 2013 Spring 2014
A significant growth is evident in this group of students.

12%
MAP (3rd-5th)
Mathematics
the 2011 normative
15%
27%
24%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
We can observe an increasing trend from Spring 2011-2014.

33%
MAP (6th - 8th)
Mathematics
the 2011 normative
42% 43%
47%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Mathematics results.

48%
MAP (9th -11th)
Mathematics
the 2011 normative
63% 61% 59%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
An increase from Spring 2011-2012 followed by a slight decrease in the
following years.

9%
13%
31%
60%
8%
21%
54%
68%
22%
4%
32%
41%
44%
39%
53%
26%
39%
68%
65%
71%
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Class of 2015
Class of 2017
Class of 2019
Class of 2020
Class of 2022
Class of 2024
MAP Results
Mathematics - Increasing trend
2014
2013
2012
2011

20%
53%
25% 26%
19%
39%
68%
38%
65%
47%
71%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Class of
2025
Class of
2024
Class of
2023
Class of
2022
Class of
2021
Class of
2020
Class of
2019
Class of
2018
Class of
2017
Class of
2016
Class of
2015
MAP Results
Mathematics
Taking into account our measurable objectives and MAP test results, by spring 2014
our overall level of performance should have been a 50% in Mathematics. The
classes of 2024, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016, and 2015 have met and/or surpassed
the growth projection made from Spring 2012 results to Spring 2017 per class.

41%
33%
27%
50%
39%
60%
54%
100%
53%
76%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Class of
2024
Class of
2023
Class of
2022
Class of
2021
Class of
2020
Class of
2019
Class of
2018
Class of
2017
Class of
2016
Class of
2015
Mathematics
The classes of 2015, 2017, and 2019 demonstrated a strong
performance in the area of Mathematics.

Mathematics
37%
20%
41%
18%
24%
15%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
PSAT
2011
2012
2013
This is the area with the lowest overall performance.

97%
70%
63%
48%
42%
67%
25%
62%
52%
70%
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
Midterm and Final Exam Average 2014
Mathematics
Percentage of Students at or above 80
The class of 2023 had the
strongest performance in
Midterm and Final exams.

National Mandated Exam Results
Percent of Students At or Above Mean
8th Grade
Year Lengua Española Matemáticas Ciencias Sociales
Ciencias de la
Naturaleza
2011 100% 100% 100% 100%
2012 100% 100% 100% 100%
2013 100% 100% 100% 100%
12th Grade
Year Lengua Española Matemáticas Ciencias Sociales
Ciencias de la
Naturaleza
2011 100% 100% 100% 100%
2012 100% 100% 100% 92%
2013 100% 100% 100% 100%
Based on the reports submitted by the Dominican Ministry of Education, all
classes are performing at or above the mean.

Factors that might have limited growth
» Transition to Common Core MAP in Fall 2013.
» Adoption of Common Core Mathematics and Language curricula.
» Fluctuation in student population.
» Faculty turnover rate in MS/HS.
» High number of maternity leaves in Elementary staff.
Factors that might have contributed growth
» Involving students in goal setting activities using MAP results.
» Provision of resources that allows to track student performance.
» Teacher trainings regarding data analysis and timely feedback.
» Appropriate implementation of school improvement efforts.

Actions taken based on data results
» Extended school hours twice a week for 8th and 12th grade
students.
» Revision of Social Studies 9th grade curriculum to include
important topics from our local Sociales curriclum (Dominican
History).
» Implementation of SuccessMaker (digital curriculum for Math
and Reading).
» Implementation of Summer Reading Program. Use of Lexile
Levels to target reading instruction.
» Increase of math contact hours in grades K-5.
» Integration of IXL Math in grades 2-11 (online math practice).
» SAT prep courses and Math FUNdamentals as elective offers.

Based on the obtained results from our student
performance data, the school is considering revising
the measurable objectives from our Improvement Plan
taking into account individual subgroups
performance.

MAP Results Analysis K-11th

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (17)

Similar to MAP Results Analysis K-11th

Similar to MAP Results Analysis K-11th (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

MAP Results Analysis K-11th