The document provides information on state indicator requirements for schools' 2011-2012 report cards. At least 75% of students must score proficient or higher on state tests for grades 3-8 and 10 for schools to meet indicators. For 11th grade tests, 85% must pass, and attendance and graduation rates must be at least 93% and 90%, respectively. The school met 12 out of 12 state indicators and earned a Performance Index of 109.0, designating it as Excellent. Student performance data is also presented by subject, grade, and student group.

1. Tomeetatestindicatorforgrades
3-8and10,atleast75%ofstudents
testedmustscoreproficientorhigher
onthattest.Otherindicatorrequirementsare:
11thgradeOhioGraduationTests,85%;Attendance
Rate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%.
State
Indicators
2011-2012 School Year Report Card
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 85 percent
The state requirement is 93 percent
The state requirement is 90 percent
3rd Grade Achievement
1. Reading
2. Mathematics
4th Grade Achievement
3. Reading
4. Mathematics
5th Grade Achievement
5. Reading
6. Mathematics
7. Science
6th Grade Achievement
8. Reading
9. Mathematics
7th Grade Achievement
10. Reading
11. Mathematics
8th Grade Achievement
12. Reading
13. Mathematics
14. Science
Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade)
15. Reading
16. Mathematics
17. Writing
18. Science
19. Social Studies
Ohio Graduation Tests (11th Grade)
20. Reading
21. Mathematics
22. Writing
23. Science
24. Social Studies
Attendance Rate
25. All Grades
2010-11 Four-Year Graduation Rate
26. School
The state requirement is 75 percent
The state requirement is 75 percent
The six designations are
• Excellent with Distinction
• Excellent
• Effective
• ContinuousImprovement
• Academic Watch
• Academic Emergency
Value-AddedAdequate
YearlyProgress
Performance
Index
Indicators
TheSchoolReportCardforthe
2011-2012schoolyearshows
theprogressschoolshavemade
basedonfourmeasuresof
performance.
Thecombinationofthefour
measuresisthebasisfor
assigningstatedesignations
todistricts,buildingsand
communityschools.
Your School’s
Designation: Performance
Index
State
Indicators Performance
Index
OntheWeb:reportcard.ohio.gov
State
Indicators
(0-120 points)
*
Your School
2011-2012
Your District
2011-2012
State
2011-2012
Percentage of Students at and above the Proficient Level
Any result at or above the state standard is indicated by a .
-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.
Cumulative results for students who took the tests as 10th or 11th graders.
*
Current Principal:
Current Superintendent:
Value-Added
Component
Score
= met
+ = above
– = below
Value-Added
Measure
Value-Added
Component
Score
= met
+ = above
– = below
Value-Added
Measure
AYP
IRN# 002709
Big Walnut High School
PO Box 5001, Sunbury, OH 43074-5001—Grades 9-12—Delaware County
Excellent
12
Met
--
StevenJ.Mazzi(740)965-3010
StephenP.Fujii(740)965-3766
Number of State
Indicators
Met out of 12
109.0
91.8%
88.6%
95.4%
90.4%
92.2%
88.8%
90.7%
94.6%
87.4%
86.4%
83.1%
93.8%
90.6%
92.5%
95.6%
95.6%
96.9%
92.0%
96.5%
79.0%
79.8%
83.3%
78.4%
76.8%
67.5%
72.5%
86.7%
79.9%
79.5%
73.6%
83.0%
79.6%
71.5%
86.0%
82.6%
87.1%
76.7%
81.6%
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
95.6%
95.6%
96.9%
92.0%
96.5%
94.9%
95.8%
95.8%
95.3%
94.8%
92.6%
89.9%
93.0%
85.6%
87.8%
94.9%
95.8%
95.8%
95.3%
94.8%
95.4% 94.5%93.8%
92.9% 79.7%92.9%

2. 2
All students in the school for a full academic year are included in the results.
The State
Indicators
are based on state
assessments, as well
as on attendance and
graduationrates.
Toearnanindicator
forAchievementor
GraduationTests,at
least75% ofstudents
mustreach proficient
orabovefor the given
assessment. For
the 11th grade Ohio
GraduationTests
indicators,acumulative
85%passagerateforeach
assessmentis required.
State
Indicators
Your School’s Assessment Results Over Time
Big Walnut High School, Delaware County

3. 3
Overall Composite
Scores reflect grade level and overall composite
ratings for the 2011-2012 school year.
Value-Added Measure
Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
Reading
Mathematics
On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov
Yourschool’sValue-Addedratingrepresentstheprogressyour
schoolhasmadewithitsstudentssincelastschoolyear.
Incontrast,achievementscoresrepresentstudents’performance
atapointintime. Ascoreof“Above”indicatesgreaterthanoneyearof
progresshasbeenachieved;“Met”indicatesoneyearofprogresshas
beenachieved;“Below”indicateslessthanoneyearofprogresshasbeen
achieved.Value-Addedresultsarecomputedonlyforbuildingsthatinclude
sufficienttestingdataforstudentsinanygrade4through8.
Met
Expected Growth
=
- Below
Expected Growth
=
+ Above
Expected Growth
=
Legend
Performance Index
Performance Level Across Grades
3-8 and 10 for All Tested Subjects
(Includes every student enrolled in
the school for a full academic year)
X =WeightPercentage Points
Your School’s Performance Index
Performance Index Calculations
for the 2011-2012 School Year
0.0
0.3
0.6
1.0
1.1
1.2
Untested
Limited
Basic
Proficient
Accelerated
Advanced
X
X
X
X
X
X
=
=
=
=
=
=
ThePerformance
Index reflects the
achievementofeverystudent
enrolledforthefullacademic
year.ThePerformanceIndex
isaweightedaveragethatincludes
alltestedsubjectsandgradesand
untestedstudents.Thegreatest
weightisgiventoadvancedscores
(1.2);theweightsdecreaseforeach
performancelevelandaweightof
zeroisgiventountestedstudents.
Thisresultsinascalefrom0to120
points.ThePerformanceIndexcanbe
comparedacrossyearstoshow
schoolachievementtrends.
Performance
Index
2011-2012 2010-2011 2009-2010
Performance Index Over Time
Note: Value-Added results are computed only for buildings that include students in grades 4 through 8.
Value-Added
Component
Score
= met
+ = above
– = below
d
e
w
Value-Added
Measure
Big Walnut High School, Delaware County
0.0
1.4
3.3
20.4
36.5
38.3
0.0
0.4
2.0
20.4
40.2
46.0
109.0
109.0 103.6 101.8

4. All
Students
All
Students
Asian or
Pacific Islander
Asian or
Pacific Islander
Econ.
Disadvtgd
Econ.
Disadvtgd
Multi-Racial Multi-RacialHispanic Hispanic
Students with
Disabilities
Students with
Disabilities
Limited English
Proficient
Limited English
Proficient
White,
non-Hispanic
White,
non-Hispanic
American Indian/
Alaska Native
American Indian/
Alaska Native
Black,
non-Hispanic
Black,
non-Hispanic
4
Grades 3-8 and 10
Reading
and
Mathematics
Adequate Yearly
Progress
All Students
PercentProficientPercentTested
Economically Disadvantaged
Asian/Pacific Islander
Black, non-Hispanic
American Indian/Alaska Native
Hispanic
Multi-Racial
White, non-Hispanic
Students with Disabilities
Limited English Proficient
Reading
Mathematics
Reading
Mathematics
Graduation Rate
Attendance Rate*
Legend
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Reading
Proficiency:
Mathematics
Proficiency:
Reading
Participation:
Mathematics
Participation:
Attendance
Rate:
AYP Determination
by Indicator
Graduation
Rate:
AYP Determination
by Subgroup
AYP
Determination
for Your School:
This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this year’s AYP goals.
For test indicators, AYP can be met in one of four ways:
1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;
2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;
3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harbor;
4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results.
Class of 2010 Five-Year Graduation Rate Information
For the non-test attendance rate indicator, AYP can be met in one of three ways:
1) meeting the AYP target with the current year results;
2) meeting the AYP target with two-year combined results;
3) making improvement over the previous year.
For the non-test graduation rate indicator, AYP can be met in one of two ways:
1) meeting the AYP target with the current year results;
2) making a 2 percentage point improvement over the previous year.
Attendance Rate is evaluated only for the All Students subgroup.*
NR
N/A
Met
Not Met
Not Required – This indicator was not evaluated for this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statistically
reliable result. 30 students is the minimum size for the proficiency and non-test indicators, while 40 is the minimum size for the participation rate indicators.
This subgroup met AYP for this indicator with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harbor, or growth measure results.
This subgroup did not meet AYP for this indicator.
Not applicable.
Class of 2011 Four-Year Graduation Rate Information
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
NR
NR
NR
NR
Met NR NR NR NR NR NR Met NR NR
Met Met NR NR NR NR NR Met Met NR
Met Met NR NR NR NR NR Met Met NR
Met
Met
Met
Met
Met
N/A
Met
Big Walnut High School, Delaware County
N/A
95.0%92.9%
----
----
----
----
----
----
81.3%83.8%
86.1%78.8%
95.0%92.6%

5. -- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.
Reading
Writing
Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
Reading
Writing
Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
Reading
Writing
Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
Reading
Writing
Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
Reading
Writing
Mathematics
Science
Social Studies
Black,
non-Hispanic
American
Indian/
Alaska Native
Asian or
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic
Multi-
Racial
White,
non-Hispanic
Non-
Disabled
Students
Students
with
Disabilities
Migrant
Non-
Econ.
Disadvtgd
Econ.
Disadvtgd
Limited
English
Proficient
Female Male
Your School’s Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level
Percentage of Students Scoring Limited
Percentage of Students Scoring Basic
Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient
Percentage of Students Scoring Accelerated
Percentage of Students Scoring Advanced
State and Federally Required School Information
5
Number of Limited English Proficient Students
Excluded from Accountability Calculations
Average Daily
Student
Enrollment
Black,
non-
Hispanic
American
Indian or
Alaska Native
Asian or
Pacific
Islander
Hispanic Multi-Racial
White,
non-
Hispanic
Students
with
Disabilities
Migrant
Economically
Disadvantaged
Limited
English
Proficient
Your School’s Students 2011-2012
Underthefederal
NoChildLeftBehind
Act, states are
required to report
certaindataabout
schoolsandteachers.
Datapresentedhere
areforreporting
purposesonlyand
arenotusedinthe
computationofthe
statedesignation
fordistrictsand
schools.
Your BuildingYour Building’s Poverty Status*: District
Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelor’s Degree
Percentage of teachers with at least a Master’s Degree
Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes
not taught by highly qualified teachers
Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes
taught by properly certified teachers
Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught
by teachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure
School Teacher Information
*High-poverty schools are those ranked in the top quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students. Low-poverty schools are those ranked in the bottom quartile based on the percentage of economically disadvantaged students.
-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.
921
--
Big Walnut High School, Delaware County
Low Poverty
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
1.4
0.9
2.4
0.9
1.9
2.8
2.4
1.9
6.6
1.9
22.2
27.4
16.5
15.6
20.8
39.6
65.1
24.5
29.7
22.2
34.0
4.2
54.7
47.2
53.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.5
5.1
1.5
19.5
22.6
14.9
12.8
19.0
41.0
73.3
23.1
30.8
21.5
38.5
4.1
61.5
51.3
57.9
9.7
6.5
16.1
6.5
12.9
16.1
16.1
12.9
19.4
3.2
38.7
54.8
25.8
32.3
35.5
29.0
19.4
35.5
22.6
32.3
6.5
3.2
9.7
19.4
16.1
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
1.0
1.0
1.5
1.0
1.0
2.1
1.5
2.1
5.1
2.1
21.5
23.6
14.4
14.9
18.5
40.0
69.2
26.2
30.3
24.6
35.4
4.6
55.9
48.7
53.8
3.2
0.0
6.5
0.0
6.5
9.7
6.5
3.2
19.4
0.0
25.8
48.4
29.0
19.4
38.7
35.5
45.2
16.1
25.8
12.9
25.8
0.0
45.2
35.5
41.9
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.9
0.0
1.8
0.0
1.8
4.5
1.8
1.8
7.3
3.6
17.3
18.2
18.2
18.2
22.7
35.5
73.6
21.8
28.2
20.9
41.8
6.4
56.4
46.4
50.9
1.7
1.7
2.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
2.6
2.6
6.9
0.0
26.7
35.3
14.7
12.9
19.8
43.1
58.6
27.6
31.0
25.0
26.7
1.7
52.6
47.4
53.4
1.6% -- -- 2.1% 3.7% 91.8% 13.5% -- 13.1% --
100.0% 100.0%
63.7% 60.7%
0.6% 0.2%
99.1% 99.6%
0.0% 0.0%

6. 6
1. IfaschoolmeetsAYPinthecurrentyear,itcanbe
ratednolowerthanContinuousImprovement.
2. IfanExcellentorEffectiveschooldoesnotmeetAYP
forthesametwo(ormore)subgroupsforthree
consecutiveyears,itsratingwillbedecreasedto
EffectiveorContinuousImprovement(respectively).
Oncethepreliminarydesignationisdetermined,Value-Added,
thefourthmeasureintheaccountabilitysystem,isevaluated
todeterminetheimpact(ifany)ontheschool’sfinal
designation.
1. Ifyourschool’sdesignationeitherisincreasedordecreased
duetoAYP,Value-Addedhasnoimpactonthedesignation
andthepreliminarydesignationbecomesthefinaldesignation.
2. Ifyourschoolexperiencesaboveexpectedgrowthinthe
currentyear,yourschool’sfinaldesignationwillincrease
byonedesignation.
3. Ifyourschoolexperiencesbelowexpectedgrowthforat
leasttwoconsecutiveyears,yourschool’sfinal
designationwilldecreasebyonedesignation.
Thepreliminarydesignationresultsfromidentifyingthe
highervaluebetweenthepercentageofindicatorsmet
byyourschoolandyourschool’sPerformanceIndex.
AYPthenisevaluatedtodetermineitseffectonthe
preliminarydesignation. Therearetwowaysinwhich
AYPcanaffectthepreliminarydesignation.
Determiningyourschool’sreportcarddesignationisamulti-stepprocess. Thefirststepistodetermineapreliminarydesignation,which
isbasedonthefollowingcomponents:1)thepercentageofindicatorsmet,2)thePerformanceIndexand3)AYPdetermination.
Determining Your School’s Designation
Indicators Met Performance Index AYP Designation Preliminary Designation
94%-100% 100 to 120or
or
or
or
or
and
and
and
and
and
andand
Met or Not Met Excellent or Effective
75%-93.9%
0%-74.9%
50%-74.9%
31%-49.9%
0%-30.9%
90 to 99.9
80 to 89.9
0 to 89.9
70 to 79.9
0 to 69.9
Met or Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Not Met
Met
Effective or Continuous Improvement
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
Continuous
Improvement
=
=
=
=
=
=
Preliminary Designation Value-Added Measure* Final Designation
Excellent
Effective
Continuous Improvement
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
Above expected growth in the current year
and
and
and
and
and
Excellent with Distinction
Effective
Above expected growth in the current year
Above expected growth in the current year
Above expected growth in the current year
Above expected growth in the current year
Excellent
Continuous Improvement
Academic Emergency
Academic Watch
Academic Emergency
Continuous Improvement
Academic Watch
Effective
*Inallothercases,Value-Addedwillhavenoimpactonthedesignationandthepreliminarydesignationwillbecomethefinaldesignation.
or
or
or
or
or
Value-Added
Component
Score
= met
+ = above
– = below
Below expected growth for 2 consecutive years
Below expected growth for 2 consecutive years
Below expected growth for 2 consecutive years
Below expected growth for 2 consecutive years
Below expected growth for 2 consecutive years
Big Walnut High School, Delaware County

7. 7
The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),
oftenreferredtoas“TheNation’sReportCard,”istheonlynationallyrepresentativeand
continuingassessmentthatenablesthecomparisonofperformanceinOhioandotherstates
invarioussubjectareas.Schoolsandstudentswithineachstateareselectedrandomlyto
beapartoftheassessment.Notallstudentsinthestateorinaparticularschooltakethe
assessment.Dataarereportedatthestatelevelonly,andtherearenoindividualstudentor
evenschoolsummaryresults.Theassessmentsareconductedinmathematics,reading,science,
writing,thearts,civics,economics,geographyandU.S.history.
ToviewOhio’smostrecent
NAEPresults,goto:
andsearchforkeyword“NAEP”
http://education.ohio.gov
Big Walnut High School, Delaware County