SlideShare a Scribd company logo
CALCULATIONS AND ANALYSIS
See Stress Calculation Spreadsheet for sources of equations,
sources of constants and material properties, and additional
calculations
Impact Analysis
Direct wheel impact at max speed
 By using the deflection equation,
EI
Fl
s
192
3
= (based upon two fully constrained
rod ends), solving for F, and using a basic kinematic equation (
)(2
22
savv of ∆== ) to solve for s in terms of F, the force of impact can be
determined (227505 N)
 Utilizing shaft stress equations shown below the stress can be determined (400
MPa)
 When comparing this to the shaft’s yield strength, a factor of safety of 1.33 is
calculated
Direct pulley impact at max speed
 Utilizing this same force and finding the stress on the shaft due to bending.
I
Mc
=σ =8510 MPa
 This means the shaft will permanently bend due to the moment applied on it
 The way to avoid this catastrophic failure is to ensure the chassis protects these
open gears by extending past its edges or enclosing it completely. While this may
not completely ensure the module’s safety, it will fix nearly every probable
scenario.
Shaft Stress Calculations
Shaft 1 (Diameter=3/8”)
• Material: 1045 Steel, Yield Strength (Sy)= 530 MPa, Ultimate Strength= 625MPa
• Max Stress
o The shaft is keyed for a 3/32” key, thus a close approximation for the actual
yield strength is ¾ the materials yield strength (Keyed Yield Strength=398
MPa)
o Loading is comprised of three components
 Moment-Based on cantilevered distance from bearing and radial load
exerted on shaft from the miter gear (2.1 N-m)
 Force- Based on axial load exerted on shaft from miter gear (156.12
N)
 Torque- Exerted by the stall torque of the motor, through a gear ratio
of 2:1 (9.64 N-m)
o Stress Calculation-

2/122
max ]48)8[(
4
TFdM
d
++
Π
=σ =102 MPa

2/122
3max ]64)8[(
2
TFdM
d
++
Π
=τ = 58.4 MPa
o Factors of Safety-

maxσ
yS
n = = 3.9

max2τ
yS
n = = 3.4
• Fatigue Life
o Infinite Life- 2000RPM (Average operating speed)=33.3 cycles/second
 5 year life @ 1 hour operating time (2 hr per week)-approximately
1,908,000 seconds of use
 33.3*1,908,000=6.4E7 cycles to failure for infinite life
o The endurance strength can be calculated using the stress concentration
factors from the keyway (197 MPa)
o σ’F=Sut+345MPa= 970 MPa
o
)2log(
)/'log(
e
eF
N
S
b
σ
−= =-0.109915548
o
b
ut
F
S
f )102(
' 3
⋅=
σ
=.673
o
e
ut
S
Sf
a
2
)( ⋅
= =900 MPa
o Loads are based on typical operating conditions, not max conditions
 Moment-Based on cantilevered distance from bearing and radial load
exerted on shaft from the miter gear (2.1 N-m)
 Force- Based on axial load exerted on shaft from miter gear (156.12
N)
 Torque- Exerted by the operating torque of the motor, through a gear
ratio of 2:1 (2.82 N-m)
o 2/122
3
]48)8[(
4
TFdM
d
a ++
Π
=σ = 39.4 MPa
o b
a
a
N
1






=
σ = 2.25E12 cycles to failure
Shaft 2 (Diameter=1/2”)
• Material: 1045 Steel, Yield Strength= 530 MPa, Ultimate Strength= 625MPa
• Max Stress
o The shaft is keyed for a 1/8” key, thus the actual yield strength can be equated
to ¾ the materials yield strength (Keyed Yield Strength=398 MPa)
o Loading is comprised of three components
 Moment-Based on the axle length between bearings and radial load
exerted on shaft from the miter gear (4.28 N-m)
 Force- Based on axial load exerted on shaft from miter gear (156.12
N)
 Torque- Exerted by the stall torque of the motor, through a gear ratio
of 2:1 (9.64 N-m)
o Stress Calculation-

2/122
max ]48)8[(
4
TFdM
d
++
Π
=σ = 47.2 MPa

2/122
3max ]64)8[(
2
TFdM
d
++
Π
=τ = 26.5 MPa
o Factors of Safety-

maxσ
yS
n = = 8.4

max2τ
yS
n = = 7.5
• Fatigue Life
o Infinite Life- 1000RPM=16.67 cycles/second
 5 year life @ 1 hour operating time (2 hr per week)-approximately
1,908,000 seconds of use
 16.67*1,908,000=3.2E7 cycles to failure for infinite life
o The endurance strength can be calculated using the stress concentration
factors from the keyway (197 MPa)
o σ’F=Sut+345MPa= 970 MPa
o
)2log(
)/'log(
e
eF
N
S
b
σ
−= =-0.109915548
o
b
ut
F
S
f )102(
' 3
⋅=
σ
=.673
o
e
ut
S
Sf
a
2
)( ⋅
= =900 MPa
o Loads are based on typical operating conditions, not max conditions
 Moment-Based on the axle length between bearings and radial load
exerted on shaft from the miter gear (4.28 N-m)
 Force- Based on axial load exerted on shaft from miter gear (156.12
N)
 Torque- Exerted by the operating torque of the motor, through a gear
ratio of 2:1 (2.82 N-m)
o 2/122
3
]48)8[(
4
TFdM
d
a ++
Π
=σ = 25.6 MPa
o b
a
a
N
1






=
σ = 1.15E14 cycles to failure
Shaft 3 (Diameter=3/4”)
• Material: 1045 Steel, Yield Strength= 530 MPa, Ultimate Strength= 625MPa
• Max Stress
o The shaft is keyed for a 3/16” key, thus the actual yield strength can be
equated to ¾ the materials yield strength (Keyed Yield Strength=398 MPa)
o Loading is comprised of three components
 Moment-Based on the axle length between bearings and the force
exerted by the weight of the system (21.53 N-m)
 Force- Based on axial load exerted on the shaft from turning forces
(235.44 N)
 Torque- Exerted by the stall torque of the motor, through a gear ratio
of 8:1 (38.56 N-m)
o Stress Calculation-

2/122
max ]48)8[(
4
TFdM
d
++
Π
=σ = 59.0 MPa

2/122
3max ]64)8[(
2
TFdM
d
++
Π
=τ = 32.7 MPa
o Factors of Safety-

maxσ
yS
n = = 6.7

max2τ
yS
n = = 6.1
• Fatigue Life
o Infinite Life- 500RPM=8.34 cycles/second
 5 year life @ 1 hour operating time (2 hr per week)-apprx 1,908,000
seconds of use
 8.34*1,908,000=1.6E7 cycles to failure for infinite life
o The endurance strength can be calculated using the stress concentration
factors from the keyway (197 MPa)
o σ’F=Sut+345MPa= 970 MPa
o
)2log(
)/'log(
e
eF
N
S
b
σ
−= =-0.109915548
o
b
ut
F
S
f )102(
' 3
⋅=
σ
=.673
o
e
ut
S
Sf
a
2
)( ⋅
= =900 MPa
o Loads are based on typical operating conditions, not max conditions
 Moment-Based on the axle length between bearings and the force
exerted by the weight of the system (21.53 N-m)
 Force- Based on axial load exerted on the shaft from turning forces
(235.4 N)
 Torque- Exerted by the operating torque of the motor, through a gear
ratio of 8:1 (11.28 N-m)
o 2/122
3
]48)8[(
4
TFdM
d
a ++
Π
=σ = 35.6 MPa
o b
a
a
N
1






=
σ = 5.7E12 cycles to failure
Steering Shaft (Diameter=1/4”)
• Material: 303 Stainless Steel, Yield Strength= 240 MPa, Ultimate Strength= 620 MPa
• Max Stress
o Loading is based on torque alone (0.745 N-m)
o Stress Calculation-

2/122
max ]48)8[(
4
TFdM
d
++
Π
=σ = 25.7 MPa

2/122
3max ]64)8[(
2
TFdM
d
++
Π
=τ = 14.8 MPa
o Factors of Safety-

maxσ
yS
n = = 9.4

max2τ
yS
n = = 8.1
• Fatigue Life
o σ’F=Sut+345MPa=965E6 MPa
o
)2log(
)/'log(
e
eF
N
S
b
σ
−= =-0.07772
o
b
ut
F
S
f )102(
' 3
⋅=
σ
=.862
o
e
ut
S
Sf
a
2
)( ⋅
= =914 MPa
o Load is comprised of torque alone (.745 N-m)
o 2/122
3
]48)8[(
4
TFdM
d
a ++
Π
=σ = 25.7 MPa
o b
a
a
N
1






=
σ = 9.3E19 cycles to failure
Spur Gears (Calculated using ANSI standards)
Driving Spur
 Material- Carbon Steel, Yield Strength=76900 psi, Modulus of Elasticity=30E6
psi, Poisson’s Ratio=.29, Brunell Hardness 179
 Max Bending Stress
o
V
H
W t ⋅
=
33000
= 306.8 lbf
o Ko= 1.25 - Overload Factor, based on light shocks encountered
o Kv= 1.15 - Dynamic Factor, based on quality and velocity of gears
o Ks= 1 - Size Factor
o Pd= .833” – Pitch diameter
o F= .25” – face width
o Km= 1.20 – Load-Distribution factor, based on geometry
o KB= 1 – Rim Thickness factor, based on geometry
o J= .325- Geometry factor, based on number of teeth of gears
o
J
KK
F
P
KKKW Bmd
svo
t
=σ =5357.1 psi
o
maxσ
yS
n = = 9.0
 Endurance Stress
o
2/1
22
)
11
(
1














−
+
−
=
G
G
p
p
p
E
v
E
v
C
π
=2284.7 lbf/in2
o Cf=1
o I=0.08- Geometry Factor
o 2/1
)(
I
C
FP
K
KKWC
f
d
m
so
t
p=σ =56972.4 psi
o Sc= 180000 psi- Repeatedly applied contact strength @ 107
cycles,
material property
o Zn=.59 - Stress cycle life factor, based on hardness and number of cycles
o CH=1 -Hardness ratio factor
o KT= 1- Temperature factor
o KR= 1 – Reliability factor
o
σ
)/( RTHNc
H
KKCZS
S = =1.9
o Comparable factor of safety= SH
2
=3.5
Driven Spur
 Material- Carbon Steel, Yield Strength=76900 psi, Modulus of Elasticity=30E6
psi, Poisson’s Ratio=.29, Brunell Hardness 179
 Max Bending Stress
o
V
H
W t ⋅
=
33000
= 306.7 lbf
o Ko= 1.25 - Overload Factor, based on light shocks encountered
o Kv= 1.15 - Dynamic Factor, based on quality and velocity of gears
o Ks= 1 - Size Factor
o Pd= 1.667” – Pitch diameter
o F= .25” – face width
o Km= 1.19 – Load-Distribution factor, based on geometry
o KB= 1 – Rim Thickness factor, based on geometry
o J= .389- Geometry factor, based on number of teeth of gears
o
J
KK
F
P
KKKW Bmd
svo
t
=σ =9011.0 psi
o
maxσ
yS
n = = 5.4
 Endurance Stress
o
2/1
22
)
11
(
1














−
+
−
=
G
G
p
p
p
E
v
E
v
C
π
=2284.7 lbf/in2
o Cf=1
o I=0.08- Geometry Factor
o 2/1
)(
I
C
FP
K
KKWC
f
d
m
so
t
p=σ = 40010.7 psi
o Sc= 180000 psi- Repeatedly applied contact strength @ 107
cycles,
material property
o Zn=.60 - Stress cycle life factor, based on hardness and number of cycles
o CH=1 -Hardness ratio factor
o KT= 1- Temperature factor
o KR= 1 – Reliability factor
o
σ
)/( RTHNc
H
KKCZS
S = = 2.70
o Comparable factor of safety= SH
2
=7.2
Ring/Pinion Gears (Calculated using ANSI standards)
Steering Spur
 Material- 2024-T4 Aluminum, Yield Strength=47000 psi, Modulus of
Elasticity=10.4E6 psi, Poisson’s Ratio=.333
 Max Bending Stress
o
V
H
W t ⋅
=
33000
= 39.3 lbf
o Ko= 1.25 - Overload Factor, based on light shocks encountered
o Kv= 1.10 - Dynamic Factor, based on quality and velocity of gears
o Ks= 1 - Size Factor
o Pd= .4375” – Pitch diameter
o F= .125” – face width
o Km= 1.20 – Load-Distribution factor, based on geometry
o KB= 1 – Rim Thickness factor, based on geometry
o J= .24- Geometry factor, based on number of teeth of gears
o
J
KK
F
P
KKKW Bmd
svo
t
=σ =951.8 psi
o
maxσ
yS
n = = 44.1
Steering Ring
 Material- 2024-T4 Aluminum, Yield Strength=47000 psi, Modulus of
Elasticity=10.4E6 psi, Poisson’s Ratio=.333
 Max Bending Stress
o
V
H
W t ⋅
=
33000
= 39.3 lbf
o Ko= 1.25 - Overload Factor, based on light shocks encountered
o Kv= 1.10 - Dynamic Factor, based on quality and velocity of gears
o Ks= 1 - Size Factor
o Pd= 3.125” – Pitch diameter
o F= .125” – face width
o Km= 1.8 – Load-Distribution factor, based on geometry
o KB= 1 – Rim Thickness factor, based on geometry
o J= .4- Geometry factor, based on number of teeth of gears
o
J
KK
F
P
KKKW Bmd
svo
t
=σ = 3996.0 psi
o
maxσ
yS
n = = 10.5
Miter Gears (Calculated using ANSI standards)
Both Miters (At max torque)
 Material- Medium Carbon Steel, Yield Strength=76900 psi
 Max Bending Stress
o Pd= 1.25” – Pitch diameter
o
o
d
t
P
T
W
⋅
=
2
= 84.7 lbf
o Ko= 1.25 - Overload Factor, based on light shocks encountered
o Kv= 1 - Dynamic Factor, based on quality and velocity of gears
o Ks= .5 - Size Factor
o F= .27” – face width
o Km= 1.10 – Load-Distribution factor, based on geometry
o J= 0.175- Geometry factor, based on number of teeth of gears
o Kx= 1, Lengthwise curvature factor
o
JK
KK
KKP
F
W
x
ms
vod
t
=σ =14922.2 psi
o
maxσ
yS
n = = 5.15
Both Miters (At max speed)
 Material- Medium Carbon Steel, Yield Strength=76900 psi
 Max Bending Stress
o Pd= 1.25” – Pitch diameter
o
o
d
t
P
T
W
⋅
=
2
= 4 lbf
o Ko= 1.25 - Overload Factor, based on light shocks encountered
o Kv= 1.28 - Dynamic Factor, based on quality and velocity of gears
o Ks= .5 - Size Factor
o F= .27” – face width
o Km= 1.10 – Load-Distribution factor, based on geometry
o J= 0.175- Geometry factor, based on number of teeth of gears
o Kx= 1, Lengthwise curvature factor
o
JK
KK
KKP
F
W
x
ms
vod
t
=σ =901.6 psi
o
maxσ
yS
n = = 85.3
 Forces
o Knowing max torque on miter (9.63 N-m), we can find the max tangential
force by dividing by half the pitch diameter=> Ftan=606.6 N
o α= 20 degress -pressure angle
o d= 45 degrees
o
αcos
tanF
Fn = =645.5 N
o
αsin
1
nF
F = =220.8 N
o dFFF radialaxial sin1== =156.1 N
Retaining Rings
 On 3/8” shaft
o Ring can withstand 542.7 N of axial force
o Miter gear provides axial load= 156.1 N
o Factor of safety= 3.48
 On 1/2” shaft
o Ring can withstand 542.7 N of axial force
o Miter gear provides axial load= 156.1 N
o Factor of safety= 3.48
 On 3/4” shaft
o Ring can withstand 631.6 N of axial force
o Axial load is from turning
 Assume wheel instantaneously turns 90 degrees, the max force that
can be applied axially would be equivalent to the frictional force
 µ⋅== WFF frictionaxial =235.4 N (assuming µ=.6)
o Factor of safety= 2.68
Mechanical Brake
Max Temperature
 Assuming all kinetic energy is converted directly into heat energy,
TCmvm vplatevehveh ∆=
2
2/1
 Assume emergency brake will not be used continuously, but rather for one cycle
during the emergency
 Assume initial temperature of 23 ° Celcius
 Solving the above equation for Tfinal we find it to be 38.9 °Celcius
Heat Dissipation
 Assuming Free Convection, the time required for heat dissipation can be
calculated
 Utilizing the properties of air at room temperature, the Rayleigh number, Nusselt
number, and convection heat transfer coefficient can be calculated
 Using this information the heat transfer rate is determined
 q
E
t
∆
=∆ gives the time to dissipate the heat (4.8 minutes)
 This resultant was later verified by the manufacturer of the brake
Keys
On 3/8” Shaft
 Key is High carbon steel, Yield Strength 427 MPa, 3/32” square
 Knowing the diameter of and torque on the shaft, the shear force on the key can
be calculated (2024.1 N)
 Assuming a factor of safety of 4, the required length of the key is calculated
(.63”)
On 1/2” Shaft
 Key is High carbon steel, Yield Strength 427 MPa, 1/8” square
 Knowing the diameter of and torque on the shaft, the shear force on the key can
be calculated (1518.1 N)
 Assuming a factor of safety of 4, the required length of the key is calculated
(.35”)
On 3/4” Shaft
 Key is High carbon steel, Yield Strength 427 MPa, 3/16” square
 Knowing the diameter of and torque on the shaft, the shear force on the key can
be calculated (4048.3 N)
 Assuming a factor of safety of 4, the required length of the key is calculated
(.63”)
Keyways
• Keyway analysis was done using Cosmos FEA software
• By utilizing shaft diameters and torques, forces on keyway surfaces were
calculated and input into the program
• Factor of Safety
o Driving Miter=16
o Driven Miter=15
o Driving Pulley=3.4
o Driven Pulley=8.4
o Driven Spur=8.1
o Wheel=1.8, but in reality, failure would result in the slip of a pressed
insert, rather than physical failure of the wheel
Set Screws
To connect spur gear to 5/16” drive motor shaft
 By choosing a screw size and quantity (2- #8’s), the maximum force at the shaft
surface can be calculated (3425.1 N)
 The torque and diameter of the shaft is used to determine the actual force seen at
this shaft surface (1214.5 N)
 By comparing these two values the factor of safety is determined (2.82)
To connect spur gear to 8mm steering motor shaft
 By choosing a screw size and quantity (2-#6’s), the maximum force at the shaft
surface can be calculated (2224.1 N)
 The torque and diameter of the shaft is used to determine the actual force seen at
this shaft surface (234.6 N)
 By comparing these two values the factor of safety is determined (9.5)
Timing Belt and Pulleys
• Utilizing MITCalc simulation software and inputting various parameters
including distance between centers, power applied to belt, operating
speeds, and other operating conditions a belt type and specific model was
selected
• From this the 5M Powergrip GT2 belt was chosen and matched with
pulleys of 18 and 72 teeth
• The selection of these parts was also verified with an engineer at the
supplier sdp-si.com
Bearings
C10 = Catalog Load Rating (lbf)
LR = Rating Life (hrs)
nR = Rating Speed (RPM)
FD = Desired Radial Load (lbf)
LD = Desired Life (hrs)
nD = Desired Speed (RPM)
FR = Radial Force (lbf)
FA = Axial Force (lbf)
Fe = Equivalent Radial Load (lbf)
C0 = Static Load Rating (lbf)
X2 = Factor dependent on bearing geometry
Y2 = Factor dependent on bearing geometry
V = Rotation Factor
a = 3 (ball bearing)
e = abscissa
Lower Drive Bearing
C10 (lbs) 1171 Upper Drive Bearing Center Bearing
LR * nR 1.0E+06 C10 (lbs) 1187 C10 (lbs) 691
FD (lbs) 44.125 LR * nR 1.0E+06 LR * nR 1.0E+06
nD (RPM) 5.0E+02 Fe (lbs) 84.6 Fe (lbs) 70.6
a 3 nD (RPM) 2000 nD (RPM) 4000
ARe
D
RR
a
D
D
FYVFXF
n
nL
F
C
L
22
10 *
+=












=
LD (hrs) 3.74E+07 FA (lbs) 35.1 FA (lbs) 35.1
LD (years) 4267 FR (lbs) 35.1 FR (lbs) 35.1
a 3 a 3
Steering Bearing V 1 V 1
C10 (lbs) 300 e 0.24 e 0.3
LR * nR 1.0E+06 X2 0.56 X2 0.56
FD (lbs) 10 Y2 1.85 Y2 1.45
nD (RPM) 340 LD (hrs) 1.38E+06 LD (hrs) 2.34E+05
a 3 LD (years) 158 LD (years) 27
LD (hrs) 7.94E+07
LD (years) 9065
Screws
Bolts connecting Yoke to Turntable
Bolt type: 4 * 10-32 (SAE)
Torque applied to the turntable
T= 2.38 N-m
Converted ASTM
T = 21 lb-in
Resultant load on each bolt
lb
in
inlb
r
T
V 108.8
59.2
1
*21 =−==
inlbTM −== 21
Primary Shear Load per Bolt is
lb
n
V
F 027.2
4
108.8
' ===
Since the secondary shear Forces are equal we have
lb
r
M
r
Mr
F 027.2
59.2*4
21
44
'' 2
====
The resultant force is
lbFr 867.2=
Fr = Fa = Fb = Fc = Fd = 2.867lb
Maximum Shear Stress
As = 0.155
psi
A
F
s
r
497.18
155.
867.2
===τ
Bolts connecting Brake to Brake plate
Bolt type: 4 * 8-32 (SAE)
Torque applied to the turntable
T = 15 lb-in
Resultant load on each bolt
lb
in
inlb
r
T
V 33.13
125.1
1
*15 =−==
inlbTM −== 15
Primary Shear Load per Bolt is
lb
n
V
F 33.3
4
33.13
' ===
Since the secondary shear Forces are equal we have
lb
r
M
r
Mr
F 33.3
125.1*4
15
44
'' 2
====
The resultant force is
lbFr 714.4=
Fr = Fa = Fb = Fc = Fd = 4.714 lb
Maximum Shear Stress
As = .0992
psi
A
F
s
r
9.28
0992.
867.2
===τ
Yoke
• Yoke stress analysis was done using Cosmos FEA software
• Loading
o Weight vertically loads lower bearing holes (196.2 N each)
o Turning force loads inside wall (158.3 N)
o Driven Miter axial force loads inside wall (156 N)
o Driven Miter radial force loads upper bearing holes
o Driving Miter axial force loads upward on top plate
• Minimum factor of safety= 20
Brake Plate
• Brake plate stress analysis was done using Cosmos FEA software
• Loading
o Outside edge was fixed, as it is welded to the motor mount assembly
o Each brake mounting hole was loaded with a force corresponding to the
brake’s torque output and the holes distance from center
• Minimum factor of safety= 200
Turntable
• Capable of withstanding 750 lbs, or 340 kg
• Actual weight is about 40 kg per module
• Factor of Safety= 8.5
Figure X: Shaft Stress and Fatigue Strength Calculations
Figure X: Drive Motor Spur Gear Stress Calculation
Figure X: Miter Gear Stress and Force Calculation
Figure X: Retaining Ring Calculations Figure X: Impact Calculations
Figure
X:
Brake
Temperature and Heat Dissipation Calculations
Figure X: Key and Set Screw Analysis
Figure X: Timing Belt and Pulley Analysis
Figure X: Driven Miter Gear Keyway Analysis
Figure X: Driving Miter Gear Keyway Analysis
Figure X: Driven Pulley Keyway Analysis
Figure X: Driving Pulley Keyway Analysis (Representation)
Figure X: Driven Spur Gear Keyway Analysis
Figure X: Wheel Keyway Analysis (Representation)
Note: Actual wheel utilizes press fit keyway insert, thus failure during stall will result in
slip of this insert, rather than the physical failure of a mechanical part
Figure X: Yoke Displacement

More Related Content

What's hot

Platoon Control of Nonholonomic Robots using Quintic Bezier Splines
Platoon Control of Nonholonomic Robots using Quintic Bezier SplinesPlatoon Control of Nonholonomic Robots using Quintic Bezier Splines
Platoon Control of Nonholonomic Robots using Quintic Bezier Splines
Kaustav Mondal
 
Dynamics of structures 5th edition chopra solutions manual
Dynamics of structures 5th edition chopra solutions manualDynamics of structures 5th edition chopra solutions manual
Dynamics of structures 5th edition chopra solutions manual
Schneiderxds
 
MOMENT INERTIA OF A FLYWHEEL LAB REPORT
MOMENT INERTIA  OF A FLYWHEEL LAB REPORTMOMENT INERTIA  OF A FLYWHEEL LAB REPORT
MOMENT INERTIA OF A FLYWHEEL LAB REPORT
ENGR . GARISON KIPROTICH
 
Precast driven pile 450 x450
Precast driven pile 450 x450Precast driven pile 450 x450
Precast driven pile 450 x450
Priodeep Chowdhury
 
Design steps of foot bridge , stringer and cross girder
Design steps of foot bridge , stringer and cross girderDesign steps of foot bridge , stringer and cross girder
Design steps of foot bridge , stringer and cross girder
Gaurav Ghai
 
Fly wheel(2).docx
Fly wheel(2).docxFly wheel(2).docx
Fly wheel(2).docx
Saif al-din ali
 
Vibration attenuation control of ocean marine risers with axial-transverse co...
Vibration attenuation control of ocean marine risers with axial-transverse co...Vibration attenuation control of ocean marine risers with axial-transverse co...
Vibration attenuation control of ocean marine risers with axial-transverse co...
TELKOMNIKA JOURNAL
 
IRJET- Design of a Compact Go Kart Vehicle
IRJET- Design of a Compact Go Kart VehicleIRJET- Design of a Compact Go Kart Vehicle
IRJET- Design of a Compact Go Kart Vehicle
IRJET Journal
 
LES from first principles
LES from first principlesLES from first principles
LES from first principles
Michael Munroe
 
flywheel
flywheelflywheel
flywheel
M.D.Raj Kamal
 
AERO390Report_Xiang
AERO390Report_XiangAERO390Report_Xiang
AERO390Report_XiangXIANG Gao
 
Capítulo 14 engrenagens cilíndricas
Capítulo 14   engrenagens cilíndricasCapítulo 14   engrenagens cilíndricas
Capítulo 14 engrenagens cilíndricas
Jhayson Carvalho
 
T1
T1T1
Kollmorgen pmb motor_specsheet
Kollmorgen pmb motor_specsheetKollmorgen pmb motor_specsheet
Kollmorgen pmb motor_specsheet
Electromate
 
Virtual post rig
Virtual post rigVirtual post rig
Virtual post rig
Josep M Carbonell Oyonarte
 
A012530106
A012530106A012530106
A012530106
IOSR Journals
 
Optimum weight design of ship’s structures
Optimum weight design of ship’s structuresOptimum weight design of ship’s structures
Optimum weight design of ship’s structures
Muhammed Moanes
 

What's hot (19)

Platoon Control of Nonholonomic Robots using Quintic Bezier Splines
Platoon Control of Nonholonomic Robots using Quintic Bezier SplinesPlatoon Control of Nonholonomic Robots using Quintic Bezier Splines
Platoon Control of Nonholonomic Robots using Quintic Bezier Splines
 
Dynamics of structures 5th edition chopra solutions manual
Dynamics of structures 5th edition chopra solutions manualDynamics of structures 5th edition chopra solutions manual
Dynamics of structures 5th edition chopra solutions manual
 
MOMENT INERTIA OF A FLYWHEEL LAB REPORT
MOMENT INERTIA  OF A FLYWHEEL LAB REPORTMOMENT INERTIA  OF A FLYWHEEL LAB REPORT
MOMENT INERTIA OF A FLYWHEEL LAB REPORT
 
Precast driven pile 450 x450
Precast driven pile 450 x450Precast driven pile 450 x450
Precast driven pile 450 x450
 
Design steps of foot bridge , stringer and cross girder
Design steps of foot bridge , stringer and cross girderDesign steps of foot bridge , stringer and cross girder
Design steps of foot bridge , stringer and cross girder
 
Fly wheel(2).docx
Fly wheel(2).docxFly wheel(2).docx
Fly wheel(2).docx
 
Vibration attenuation control of ocean marine risers with axial-transverse co...
Vibration attenuation control of ocean marine risers with axial-transverse co...Vibration attenuation control of ocean marine risers with axial-transverse co...
Vibration attenuation control of ocean marine risers with axial-transverse co...
 
IRJET- Design of a Compact Go Kart Vehicle
IRJET- Design of a Compact Go Kart VehicleIRJET- Design of a Compact Go Kart Vehicle
IRJET- Design of a Compact Go Kart Vehicle
 
PPT
PPTPPT
PPT
 
LES from first principles
LES from first principlesLES from first principles
LES from first principles
 
Vibration lab manual 1
Vibration lab manual 1Vibration lab manual 1
Vibration lab manual 1
 
flywheel
flywheelflywheel
flywheel
 
AERO390Report_Xiang
AERO390Report_XiangAERO390Report_Xiang
AERO390Report_Xiang
 
Capítulo 14 engrenagens cilíndricas
Capítulo 14   engrenagens cilíndricasCapítulo 14   engrenagens cilíndricas
Capítulo 14 engrenagens cilíndricas
 
T1
T1T1
T1
 
Kollmorgen pmb motor_specsheet
Kollmorgen pmb motor_specsheetKollmorgen pmb motor_specsheet
Kollmorgen pmb motor_specsheet
 
Virtual post rig
Virtual post rigVirtual post rig
Virtual post rig
 
A012530106
A012530106A012530106
A012530106
 
Optimum weight design of ship’s structures
Optimum weight design of ship’s structuresOptimum weight design of ship’s structures
Optimum weight design of ship’s structures
 

Similar to Stress analysis

fdocuments.us_turning-moment-diagram-flywheel.ppt
fdocuments.us_turning-moment-diagram-flywheel.pptfdocuments.us_turning-moment-diagram-flywheel.ppt
fdocuments.us_turning-moment-diagram-flywheel.ppt
SukantaMandal17
 
4 static shear
4  static shear4  static shear
4 static shear
Ahmed Gamal
 
TORSION,BENDING SHEAR ..pdf
TORSION,BENDING SHEAR  ..pdfTORSION,BENDING SHEAR  ..pdf
TORSION,BENDING SHEAR ..pdf
AkshayAshokKumar2
 
P410394102
P410394102P410394102
P410394102
IJERA Editor
 
Solved Examples for Three - Phase Induction Motors
Solved  Examples for Three - Phase Induction MotorsSolved  Examples for Three - Phase Induction Motors
Solved Examples for Three - Phase Induction Motors
Ali Altahir
 
Lc серия Бонфиглиоли
Lc серия БонфиглиолиLc серия Бонфиглиоли
Lc серия Бонфиглиоли
Arve
 
Mm207 group 9 numericals
Mm207 group 9 numericalsMm207 group 9 numericals
Mm207 group 9 numericals
Abhishek chaudhary
 
Design of Machine Elements - Unit 4 Procedures
 Design of Machine Elements - Unit 4 Procedures Design of Machine Elements - Unit 4 Procedures
Design of Machine Elements - Unit 4 Procedures
s Kumaravel
 
Experimental Investigation of Faults in Roller Element Bearing Using Vibratio...
Experimental Investigation of Faults in Roller Element Bearing Using Vibratio...Experimental Investigation of Faults in Roller Element Bearing Using Vibratio...
Experimental Investigation of Faults in Roller Element Bearing Using Vibratio...
IRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...
IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...
IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...
IRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Theoretical Analysis of Rocker Arm
IRJET- Theoretical Analysis of Rocker ArmIRJET- Theoretical Analysis of Rocker Arm
IRJET- Theoretical Analysis of Rocker Arm
IRJET Journal
 
Torque - Slip Characteristic of a three phase induction motor
Torque - Slip Characteristic of a three phase induction motorTorque - Slip Characteristic of a three phase induction motor
Torque - Slip Characteristic of a three phase induction motor
Ali Altahir
 
Torque - Slip Characteristic of a three phase induction motor
Torque - Slip Characteristic of a three   phase induction motorTorque - Slip Characteristic of a three   phase induction motor
Torque - Slip Characteristic of a three phase induction motor
Ali Altahir
 
Third lecture of a three phase induction machine
Third lecture of a three   phase induction machineThird lecture of a three   phase induction machine
Third lecture of a three phase induction machine
Ali Altahir
 
Transmission and distribution system design
Transmission and distribution system designTransmission and distribution system design
Transmission and distribution system design
Bikash Gyawali
 
Mechanical Engineering Standard Design Data Book
Mechanical Engineering Standard Design Data BookMechanical Engineering Standard Design Data Book
Mechanical Engineering Standard Design Data Book
Hiten Bhadja
 
Defence presentation.pptx
Defence presentation.pptxDefence presentation.pptx
Defence presentation.pptx
JaiHsengHpa1
 
Theory of machines by rs. khurmi_ solution manual _ chapter 11
Theory of machines by rs. khurmi_ solution manual _ chapter 11Theory of machines by rs. khurmi_ solution manual _ chapter 11
Theory of machines by rs. khurmi_ solution manual _ chapter 11
Darawan Wahid
 
Guntry girder
Guntry girderGuntry girder
Guntry girder
kajol panchal
 

Similar to Stress analysis (20)

fdocuments.us_turning-moment-diagram-flywheel.ppt
fdocuments.us_turning-moment-diagram-flywheel.pptfdocuments.us_turning-moment-diagram-flywheel.ppt
fdocuments.us_turning-moment-diagram-flywheel.ppt
 
4 static shear
4  static shear4  static shear
4 static shear
 
TORSION,BENDING SHEAR ..pdf
TORSION,BENDING SHEAR  ..pdfTORSION,BENDING SHEAR  ..pdf
TORSION,BENDING SHEAR ..pdf
 
Unit5-KOM
Unit5-KOMUnit5-KOM
Unit5-KOM
 
P410394102
P410394102P410394102
P410394102
 
Solved Examples for Three - Phase Induction Motors
Solved  Examples for Three - Phase Induction MotorsSolved  Examples for Three - Phase Induction Motors
Solved Examples for Three - Phase Induction Motors
 
Lc серия Бонфиглиоли
Lc серия БонфиглиолиLc серия Бонфиглиоли
Lc серия Бонфиглиоли
 
Mm207 group 9 numericals
Mm207 group 9 numericalsMm207 group 9 numericals
Mm207 group 9 numericals
 
Design of Machine Elements - Unit 4 Procedures
 Design of Machine Elements - Unit 4 Procedures Design of Machine Elements - Unit 4 Procedures
Design of Machine Elements - Unit 4 Procedures
 
Experimental Investigation of Faults in Roller Element Bearing Using Vibratio...
Experimental Investigation of Faults in Roller Element Bearing Using Vibratio...Experimental Investigation of Faults in Roller Element Bearing Using Vibratio...
Experimental Investigation of Faults in Roller Element Bearing Using Vibratio...
 
IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...
IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...
IRJET- Design and Development of Open Differential for Transmission System of...
 
IRJET- Theoretical Analysis of Rocker Arm
IRJET- Theoretical Analysis of Rocker ArmIRJET- Theoretical Analysis of Rocker Arm
IRJET- Theoretical Analysis of Rocker Arm
 
Torque - Slip Characteristic of a three phase induction motor
Torque - Slip Characteristic of a three phase induction motorTorque - Slip Characteristic of a three phase induction motor
Torque - Slip Characteristic of a three phase induction motor
 
Torque - Slip Characteristic of a three phase induction motor
Torque - Slip Characteristic of a three   phase induction motorTorque - Slip Characteristic of a three   phase induction motor
Torque - Slip Characteristic of a three phase induction motor
 
Third lecture of a three phase induction machine
Third lecture of a three   phase induction machineThird lecture of a three   phase induction machine
Third lecture of a three phase induction machine
 
Transmission and distribution system design
Transmission and distribution system designTransmission and distribution system design
Transmission and distribution system design
 
Mechanical Engineering Standard Design Data Book
Mechanical Engineering Standard Design Data BookMechanical Engineering Standard Design Data Book
Mechanical Engineering Standard Design Data Book
 
Defence presentation.pptx
Defence presentation.pptxDefence presentation.pptx
Defence presentation.pptx
 
Theory of machines by rs. khurmi_ solution manual _ chapter 11
Theory of machines by rs. khurmi_ solution manual _ chapter 11Theory of machines by rs. khurmi_ solution manual _ chapter 11
Theory of machines by rs. khurmi_ solution manual _ chapter 11
 
Guntry girder
Guntry girderGuntry girder
Guntry girder
 

Recently uploaded

DevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectDevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
Kari Kakkonen
 
Bits & Pixels using AI for Good.........
Bits & Pixels using AI for Good.........Bits & Pixels using AI for Good.........
Bits & Pixels using AI for Good.........
Alison B. Lowndes
 
How world-class product teams are winning in the AI era by CEO and Founder, P...
How world-class product teams are winning in the AI era by CEO and Founder, P...How world-class product teams are winning in the AI era by CEO and Founder, P...
How world-class product teams are winning in the AI era by CEO and Founder, P...
Product School
 
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with Parameters
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersEssentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with Parameters
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with Parameters
Safe Software
 
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*
Frank van Harmelen
 
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...
Jeffrey Haguewood
 
The Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform EngineeringThe Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform Engineering
Jemma Hussein Allen
 
De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovati...
De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovati...De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovati...
De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovati...
Product School
 
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3
DianaGray10
 
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdfFIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdf
FIDO Alliance
 
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024
Tobias Schneck
 
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
Sri Ambati
 
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
UiPathCommunity
 
From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...
From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...
From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...
Product School
 
Designing Great Products: The Power of Design and Leadership by Chief Designe...
Designing Great Products: The Power of Design and Leadership by Chief Designe...Designing Great Products: The Power of Design and Leadership by Chief Designe...
Designing Great Products: The Power of Design and Leadership by Chief Designe...
Product School
 
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdfSmart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf
91mobiles
 
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
Elena Simperl
 
Assuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyes
Assuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyesAssuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyes
Assuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyes
ThousandEyes
 
Unsubscribed: Combat Subscription Fatigue With a Membership Mentality by Head...
Unsubscribed: Combat Subscription Fatigue With a Membership Mentality by Head...Unsubscribed: Combat Subscription Fatigue With a Membership Mentality by Head...
Unsubscribed: Combat Subscription Fatigue With a Membership Mentality by Head...
Product School
 
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
DanBrown980551
 

Recently uploaded (20)

DevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectDevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA Connect
 
Bits & Pixels using AI for Good.........
Bits & Pixels using AI for Good.........Bits & Pixels using AI for Good.........
Bits & Pixels using AI for Good.........
 
How world-class product teams are winning in the AI era by CEO and Founder, P...
How world-class product teams are winning in the AI era by CEO and Founder, P...How world-class product teams are winning in the AI era by CEO and Founder, P...
How world-class product teams are winning in the AI era by CEO and Founder, P...
 
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with Parameters
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with ParametersEssentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with Parameters
Essentials of Automations: Optimizing FME Workflows with Parameters
 
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*
 
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...
 
The Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform EngineeringThe Future of Platform Engineering
The Future of Platform Engineering
 
De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovati...
De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovati...De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovati...
De-mystifying Zero to One: Design Informed Techniques for Greenfield Innovati...
 
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3
 
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdfFIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdf
FIDO Alliance Osaka Seminar: Overview.pdf
 
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024
Kubernetes & AI - Beauty and the Beast !?! @KCD Istanbul 2024
 
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
GenAISummit 2024 May 28 Sri Ambati Keynote: AGI Belongs to The Community in O...
 
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...
 
From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...
From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...
From Daily Decisions to Bottom Line: Connecting Product Work to Revenue by VP...
 
Designing Great Products: The Power of Design and Leadership by Chief Designe...
Designing Great Products: The Power of Design and Leadership by Chief Designe...Designing Great Products: The Power of Design and Leadership by Chief Designe...
Designing Great Products: The Power of Design and Leadership by Chief Designe...
 
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdfSmart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf
 
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
When stars align: studies in data quality, knowledge graphs, and machine lear...
 
Assuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyes
Assuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyesAssuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyes
Assuring Contact Center Experiences for Your Customers With ThousandEyes
 
Unsubscribed: Combat Subscription Fatigue With a Membership Mentality by Head...
Unsubscribed: Combat Subscription Fatigue With a Membership Mentality by Head...Unsubscribed: Combat Subscription Fatigue With a Membership Mentality by Head...
Unsubscribed: Combat Subscription Fatigue With a Membership Mentality by Head...
 
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
LF Energy Webinar: Electrical Grid Modelling and Simulation Through PowSyBl -...
 

Stress analysis

  • 1. CALCULATIONS AND ANALYSIS See Stress Calculation Spreadsheet for sources of equations, sources of constants and material properties, and additional calculations Impact Analysis Direct wheel impact at max speed  By using the deflection equation, EI Fl s 192 3 = (based upon two fully constrained rod ends), solving for F, and using a basic kinematic equation ( )(2 22 savv of ∆== ) to solve for s in terms of F, the force of impact can be determined (227505 N)  Utilizing shaft stress equations shown below the stress can be determined (400 MPa)  When comparing this to the shaft’s yield strength, a factor of safety of 1.33 is calculated
  • 2. Direct pulley impact at max speed  Utilizing this same force and finding the stress on the shaft due to bending. I Mc =σ =8510 MPa  This means the shaft will permanently bend due to the moment applied on it  The way to avoid this catastrophic failure is to ensure the chassis protects these open gears by extending past its edges or enclosing it completely. While this may not completely ensure the module’s safety, it will fix nearly every probable scenario. Shaft Stress Calculations Shaft 1 (Diameter=3/8”) • Material: 1045 Steel, Yield Strength (Sy)= 530 MPa, Ultimate Strength= 625MPa • Max Stress o The shaft is keyed for a 3/32” key, thus a close approximation for the actual yield strength is ¾ the materials yield strength (Keyed Yield Strength=398 MPa) o Loading is comprised of three components  Moment-Based on cantilevered distance from bearing and radial load exerted on shaft from the miter gear (2.1 N-m)  Force- Based on axial load exerted on shaft from miter gear (156.12 N)  Torque- Exerted by the stall torque of the motor, through a gear ratio of 2:1 (9.64 N-m) o Stress Calculation-  2/122 max ]48)8[( 4 TFdM d ++ Π =σ =102 MPa  2/122 3max ]64)8[( 2 TFdM d ++ Π =τ = 58.4 MPa o Factors of Safety-  maxσ yS n = = 3.9  max2τ yS n = = 3.4 • Fatigue Life o Infinite Life- 2000RPM (Average operating speed)=33.3 cycles/second  5 year life @ 1 hour operating time (2 hr per week)-approximately 1,908,000 seconds of use  33.3*1,908,000=6.4E7 cycles to failure for infinite life o The endurance strength can be calculated using the stress concentration factors from the keyway (197 MPa) o σ’F=Sut+345MPa= 970 MPa
  • 3. o )2log( )/'log( e eF N S b σ −= =-0.109915548 o b ut F S f )102( ' 3 ⋅= σ =.673 o e ut S Sf a 2 )( ⋅ = =900 MPa o Loads are based on typical operating conditions, not max conditions  Moment-Based on cantilevered distance from bearing and radial load exerted on shaft from the miter gear (2.1 N-m)  Force- Based on axial load exerted on shaft from miter gear (156.12 N)  Torque- Exerted by the operating torque of the motor, through a gear ratio of 2:1 (2.82 N-m) o 2/122 3 ]48)8[( 4 TFdM d a ++ Π =σ = 39.4 MPa o b a a N 1       = σ = 2.25E12 cycles to failure Shaft 2 (Diameter=1/2”) • Material: 1045 Steel, Yield Strength= 530 MPa, Ultimate Strength= 625MPa • Max Stress o The shaft is keyed for a 1/8” key, thus the actual yield strength can be equated to ¾ the materials yield strength (Keyed Yield Strength=398 MPa) o Loading is comprised of three components  Moment-Based on the axle length between bearings and radial load exerted on shaft from the miter gear (4.28 N-m)  Force- Based on axial load exerted on shaft from miter gear (156.12 N)  Torque- Exerted by the stall torque of the motor, through a gear ratio of 2:1 (9.64 N-m) o Stress Calculation-  2/122 max ]48)8[( 4 TFdM d ++ Π =σ = 47.2 MPa  2/122 3max ]64)8[( 2 TFdM d ++ Π =τ = 26.5 MPa o Factors of Safety-  maxσ yS n = = 8.4  max2τ yS n = = 7.5 • Fatigue Life o Infinite Life- 1000RPM=16.67 cycles/second
  • 4.  5 year life @ 1 hour operating time (2 hr per week)-approximately 1,908,000 seconds of use  16.67*1,908,000=3.2E7 cycles to failure for infinite life o The endurance strength can be calculated using the stress concentration factors from the keyway (197 MPa) o σ’F=Sut+345MPa= 970 MPa o )2log( )/'log( e eF N S b σ −= =-0.109915548 o b ut F S f )102( ' 3 ⋅= σ =.673 o e ut S Sf a 2 )( ⋅ = =900 MPa o Loads are based on typical operating conditions, not max conditions  Moment-Based on the axle length between bearings and radial load exerted on shaft from the miter gear (4.28 N-m)  Force- Based on axial load exerted on shaft from miter gear (156.12 N)  Torque- Exerted by the operating torque of the motor, through a gear ratio of 2:1 (2.82 N-m) o 2/122 3 ]48)8[( 4 TFdM d a ++ Π =σ = 25.6 MPa o b a a N 1       = σ = 1.15E14 cycles to failure Shaft 3 (Diameter=3/4”) • Material: 1045 Steel, Yield Strength= 530 MPa, Ultimate Strength= 625MPa • Max Stress o The shaft is keyed for a 3/16” key, thus the actual yield strength can be equated to ¾ the materials yield strength (Keyed Yield Strength=398 MPa) o Loading is comprised of three components  Moment-Based on the axle length between bearings and the force exerted by the weight of the system (21.53 N-m)  Force- Based on axial load exerted on the shaft from turning forces (235.44 N)  Torque- Exerted by the stall torque of the motor, through a gear ratio of 8:1 (38.56 N-m) o Stress Calculation-  2/122 max ]48)8[( 4 TFdM d ++ Π =σ = 59.0 MPa  2/122 3max ]64)8[( 2 TFdM d ++ Π =τ = 32.7 MPa o Factors of Safety-
  • 5.  maxσ yS n = = 6.7  max2τ yS n = = 6.1 • Fatigue Life o Infinite Life- 500RPM=8.34 cycles/second  5 year life @ 1 hour operating time (2 hr per week)-apprx 1,908,000 seconds of use  8.34*1,908,000=1.6E7 cycles to failure for infinite life o The endurance strength can be calculated using the stress concentration factors from the keyway (197 MPa) o σ’F=Sut+345MPa= 970 MPa o )2log( )/'log( e eF N S b σ −= =-0.109915548 o b ut F S f )102( ' 3 ⋅= σ =.673 o e ut S Sf a 2 )( ⋅ = =900 MPa o Loads are based on typical operating conditions, not max conditions  Moment-Based on the axle length between bearings and the force exerted by the weight of the system (21.53 N-m)  Force- Based on axial load exerted on the shaft from turning forces (235.4 N)  Torque- Exerted by the operating torque of the motor, through a gear ratio of 8:1 (11.28 N-m) o 2/122 3 ]48)8[( 4 TFdM d a ++ Π =σ = 35.6 MPa o b a a N 1       = σ = 5.7E12 cycles to failure Steering Shaft (Diameter=1/4”) • Material: 303 Stainless Steel, Yield Strength= 240 MPa, Ultimate Strength= 620 MPa • Max Stress o Loading is based on torque alone (0.745 N-m) o Stress Calculation-  2/122 max ]48)8[( 4 TFdM d ++ Π =σ = 25.7 MPa  2/122 3max ]64)8[( 2 TFdM d ++ Π =τ = 14.8 MPa o Factors of Safety-  maxσ yS n = = 9.4
  • 6.  max2τ yS n = = 8.1 • Fatigue Life o σ’F=Sut+345MPa=965E6 MPa o )2log( )/'log( e eF N S b σ −= =-0.07772 o b ut F S f )102( ' 3 ⋅= σ =.862 o e ut S Sf a 2 )( ⋅ = =914 MPa o Load is comprised of torque alone (.745 N-m) o 2/122 3 ]48)8[( 4 TFdM d a ++ Π =σ = 25.7 MPa o b a a N 1       = σ = 9.3E19 cycles to failure Spur Gears (Calculated using ANSI standards) Driving Spur  Material- Carbon Steel, Yield Strength=76900 psi, Modulus of Elasticity=30E6 psi, Poisson’s Ratio=.29, Brunell Hardness 179  Max Bending Stress o V H W t ⋅ = 33000 = 306.8 lbf o Ko= 1.25 - Overload Factor, based on light shocks encountered o Kv= 1.15 - Dynamic Factor, based on quality and velocity of gears o Ks= 1 - Size Factor o Pd= .833” – Pitch diameter o F= .25” – face width o Km= 1.20 – Load-Distribution factor, based on geometry o KB= 1 – Rim Thickness factor, based on geometry o J= .325- Geometry factor, based on number of teeth of gears o J KK F P KKKW Bmd svo t =σ =5357.1 psi o maxσ yS n = = 9.0  Endurance Stress o 2/1 22 ) 11 ( 1               − + − = G G p p p E v E v C π =2284.7 lbf/in2 o Cf=1 o I=0.08- Geometry Factor
  • 7. o 2/1 )( I C FP K KKWC f d m so t p=σ =56972.4 psi o Sc= 180000 psi- Repeatedly applied contact strength @ 107 cycles, material property o Zn=.59 - Stress cycle life factor, based on hardness and number of cycles o CH=1 -Hardness ratio factor o KT= 1- Temperature factor o KR= 1 – Reliability factor o σ )/( RTHNc H KKCZS S = =1.9 o Comparable factor of safety= SH 2 =3.5 Driven Spur  Material- Carbon Steel, Yield Strength=76900 psi, Modulus of Elasticity=30E6 psi, Poisson’s Ratio=.29, Brunell Hardness 179  Max Bending Stress o V H W t ⋅ = 33000 = 306.7 lbf o Ko= 1.25 - Overload Factor, based on light shocks encountered o Kv= 1.15 - Dynamic Factor, based on quality and velocity of gears o Ks= 1 - Size Factor o Pd= 1.667” – Pitch diameter o F= .25” – face width o Km= 1.19 – Load-Distribution factor, based on geometry o KB= 1 – Rim Thickness factor, based on geometry o J= .389- Geometry factor, based on number of teeth of gears o J KK F P KKKW Bmd svo t =σ =9011.0 psi o maxσ yS n = = 5.4  Endurance Stress o 2/1 22 ) 11 ( 1               − + − = G G p p p E v E v C π =2284.7 lbf/in2 o Cf=1 o I=0.08- Geometry Factor o 2/1 )( I C FP K KKWC f d m so t p=σ = 40010.7 psi o Sc= 180000 psi- Repeatedly applied contact strength @ 107 cycles, material property o Zn=.60 - Stress cycle life factor, based on hardness and number of cycles o CH=1 -Hardness ratio factor
  • 8. o KT= 1- Temperature factor o KR= 1 – Reliability factor o σ )/( RTHNc H KKCZS S = = 2.70 o Comparable factor of safety= SH 2 =7.2 Ring/Pinion Gears (Calculated using ANSI standards) Steering Spur  Material- 2024-T4 Aluminum, Yield Strength=47000 psi, Modulus of Elasticity=10.4E6 psi, Poisson’s Ratio=.333  Max Bending Stress o V H W t ⋅ = 33000 = 39.3 lbf o Ko= 1.25 - Overload Factor, based on light shocks encountered o Kv= 1.10 - Dynamic Factor, based on quality and velocity of gears o Ks= 1 - Size Factor o Pd= .4375” – Pitch diameter o F= .125” – face width o Km= 1.20 – Load-Distribution factor, based on geometry o KB= 1 – Rim Thickness factor, based on geometry o J= .24- Geometry factor, based on number of teeth of gears o J KK F P KKKW Bmd svo t =σ =951.8 psi o maxσ yS n = = 44.1 Steering Ring  Material- 2024-T4 Aluminum, Yield Strength=47000 psi, Modulus of Elasticity=10.4E6 psi, Poisson’s Ratio=.333  Max Bending Stress o V H W t ⋅ = 33000 = 39.3 lbf o Ko= 1.25 - Overload Factor, based on light shocks encountered o Kv= 1.10 - Dynamic Factor, based on quality and velocity of gears o Ks= 1 - Size Factor o Pd= 3.125” – Pitch diameter o F= .125” – face width o Km= 1.8 – Load-Distribution factor, based on geometry o KB= 1 – Rim Thickness factor, based on geometry o J= .4- Geometry factor, based on number of teeth of gears o J KK F P KKKW Bmd svo t =σ = 3996.0 psi
  • 9. o maxσ yS n = = 10.5 Miter Gears (Calculated using ANSI standards) Both Miters (At max torque)  Material- Medium Carbon Steel, Yield Strength=76900 psi  Max Bending Stress o Pd= 1.25” – Pitch diameter o o d t P T W ⋅ = 2 = 84.7 lbf o Ko= 1.25 - Overload Factor, based on light shocks encountered o Kv= 1 - Dynamic Factor, based on quality and velocity of gears o Ks= .5 - Size Factor o F= .27” – face width o Km= 1.10 – Load-Distribution factor, based on geometry o J= 0.175- Geometry factor, based on number of teeth of gears o Kx= 1, Lengthwise curvature factor o JK KK KKP F W x ms vod t =σ =14922.2 psi o maxσ yS n = = 5.15 Both Miters (At max speed)  Material- Medium Carbon Steel, Yield Strength=76900 psi  Max Bending Stress o Pd= 1.25” – Pitch diameter o o d t P T W ⋅ = 2 = 4 lbf o Ko= 1.25 - Overload Factor, based on light shocks encountered o Kv= 1.28 - Dynamic Factor, based on quality and velocity of gears o Ks= .5 - Size Factor o F= .27” – face width o Km= 1.10 – Load-Distribution factor, based on geometry o J= 0.175- Geometry factor, based on number of teeth of gears o Kx= 1, Lengthwise curvature factor o JK KK KKP F W x ms vod t =σ =901.6 psi o maxσ yS n = = 85.3  Forces
  • 10. o Knowing max torque on miter (9.63 N-m), we can find the max tangential force by dividing by half the pitch diameter=> Ftan=606.6 N o α= 20 degress -pressure angle o d= 45 degrees o αcos tanF Fn = =645.5 N o αsin 1 nF F = =220.8 N o dFFF radialaxial sin1== =156.1 N Retaining Rings  On 3/8” shaft o Ring can withstand 542.7 N of axial force o Miter gear provides axial load= 156.1 N o Factor of safety= 3.48  On 1/2” shaft o Ring can withstand 542.7 N of axial force o Miter gear provides axial load= 156.1 N o Factor of safety= 3.48  On 3/4” shaft o Ring can withstand 631.6 N of axial force o Axial load is from turning  Assume wheel instantaneously turns 90 degrees, the max force that can be applied axially would be equivalent to the frictional force  µ⋅== WFF frictionaxial =235.4 N (assuming µ=.6) o Factor of safety= 2.68 Mechanical Brake Max Temperature  Assuming all kinetic energy is converted directly into heat energy, TCmvm vplatevehveh ∆= 2 2/1  Assume emergency brake will not be used continuously, but rather for one cycle during the emergency  Assume initial temperature of 23 ° Celcius  Solving the above equation for Tfinal we find it to be 38.9 °Celcius Heat Dissipation  Assuming Free Convection, the time required for heat dissipation can be calculated  Utilizing the properties of air at room temperature, the Rayleigh number, Nusselt number, and convection heat transfer coefficient can be calculated
  • 11.  Using this information the heat transfer rate is determined  q E t ∆ =∆ gives the time to dissipate the heat (4.8 minutes)  This resultant was later verified by the manufacturer of the brake Keys On 3/8” Shaft  Key is High carbon steel, Yield Strength 427 MPa, 3/32” square  Knowing the diameter of and torque on the shaft, the shear force on the key can be calculated (2024.1 N)  Assuming a factor of safety of 4, the required length of the key is calculated (.63”) On 1/2” Shaft  Key is High carbon steel, Yield Strength 427 MPa, 1/8” square  Knowing the diameter of and torque on the shaft, the shear force on the key can be calculated (1518.1 N)  Assuming a factor of safety of 4, the required length of the key is calculated (.35”) On 3/4” Shaft  Key is High carbon steel, Yield Strength 427 MPa, 3/16” square  Knowing the diameter of and torque on the shaft, the shear force on the key can be calculated (4048.3 N)  Assuming a factor of safety of 4, the required length of the key is calculated (.63”) Keyways • Keyway analysis was done using Cosmos FEA software • By utilizing shaft diameters and torques, forces on keyway surfaces were calculated and input into the program • Factor of Safety o Driving Miter=16 o Driven Miter=15 o Driving Pulley=3.4 o Driven Pulley=8.4 o Driven Spur=8.1 o Wheel=1.8, but in reality, failure would result in the slip of a pressed insert, rather than physical failure of the wheel Set Screws To connect spur gear to 5/16” drive motor shaft  By choosing a screw size and quantity (2- #8’s), the maximum force at the shaft surface can be calculated (3425.1 N)
  • 12.  The torque and diameter of the shaft is used to determine the actual force seen at this shaft surface (1214.5 N)  By comparing these two values the factor of safety is determined (2.82) To connect spur gear to 8mm steering motor shaft  By choosing a screw size and quantity (2-#6’s), the maximum force at the shaft surface can be calculated (2224.1 N)  The torque and diameter of the shaft is used to determine the actual force seen at this shaft surface (234.6 N)  By comparing these two values the factor of safety is determined (9.5) Timing Belt and Pulleys • Utilizing MITCalc simulation software and inputting various parameters including distance between centers, power applied to belt, operating speeds, and other operating conditions a belt type and specific model was selected • From this the 5M Powergrip GT2 belt was chosen and matched with pulleys of 18 and 72 teeth • The selection of these parts was also verified with an engineer at the supplier sdp-si.com Bearings C10 = Catalog Load Rating (lbf) LR = Rating Life (hrs) nR = Rating Speed (RPM) FD = Desired Radial Load (lbf) LD = Desired Life (hrs) nD = Desired Speed (RPM) FR = Radial Force (lbf) FA = Axial Force (lbf) Fe = Equivalent Radial Load (lbf) C0 = Static Load Rating (lbf) X2 = Factor dependent on bearing geometry Y2 = Factor dependent on bearing geometry V = Rotation Factor a = 3 (ball bearing) e = abscissa Lower Drive Bearing C10 (lbs) 1171 Upper Drive Bearing Center Bearing LR * nR 1.0E+06 C10 (lbs) 1187 C10 (lbs) 691 FD (lbs) 44.125 LR * nR 1.0E+06 LR * nR 1.0E+06 nD (RPM) 5.0E+02 Fe (lbs) 84.6 Fe (lbs) 70.6 a 3 nD (RPM) 2000 nD (RPM) 4000
  • 13. ARe D RR a D D FYVFXF n nL F C L 22 10 * +=             = LD (hrs) 3.74E+07 FA (lbs) 35.1 FA (lbs) 35.1 LD (years) 4267 FR (lbs) 35.1 FR (lbs) 35.1 a 3 a 3 Steering Bearing V 1 V 1 C10 (lbs) 300 e 0.24 e 0.3 LR * nR 1.0E+06 X2 0.56 X2 0.56 FD (lbs) 10 Y2 1.85 Y2 1.45 nD (RPM) 340 LD (hrs) 1.38E+06 LD (hrs) 2.34E+05 a 3 LD (years) 158 LD (years) 27 LD (hrs) 7.94E+07 LD (years) 9065 Screws Bolts connecting Yoke to Turntable Bolt type: 4 * 10-32 (SAE) Torque applied to the turntable T= 2.38 N-m Converted ASTM T = 21 lb-in Resultant load on each bolt lb in inlb r T V 108.8 59.2 1 *21 =−== inlbTM −== 21 Primary Shear Load per Bolt is lb n V F 027.2 4 108.8 ' === Since the secondary shear Forces are equal we have lb r M r Mr F 027.2 59.2*4 21 44 '' 2 ==== The resultant force is
  • 14. lbFr 867.2= Fr = Fa = Fb = Fc = Fd = 2.867lb Maximum Shear Stress As = 0.155 psi A F s r 497.18 155. 867.2 ===τ Bolts connecting Brake to Brake plate Bolt type: 4 * 8-32 (SAE) Torque applied to the turntable T = 15 lb-in Resultant load on each bolt lb in inlb r T V 33.13 125.1 1 *15 =−== inlbTM −== 15 Primary Shear Load per Bolt is lb n V F 33.3 4 33.13 ' === Since the secondary shear Forces are equal we have lb r M r Mr F 33.3 125.1*4 15 44 '' 2 ==== The resultant force is lbFr 714.4= Fr = Fa = Fb = Fc = Fd = 4.714 lb
  • 15. Maximum Shear Stress As = .0992 psi A F s r 9.28 0992. 867.2 ===τ Yoke • Yoke stress analysis was done using Cosmos FEA software • Loading o Weight vertically loads lower bearing holes (196.2 N each) o Turning force loads inside wall (158.3 N) o Driven Miter axial force loads inside wall (156 N) o Driven Miter radial force loads upper bearing holes o Driving Miter axial force loads upward on top plate
  • 16. • Minimum factor of safety= 20 Brake Plate • Brake plate stress analysis was done using Cosmos FEA software • Loading o Outside edge was fixed, as it is welded to the motor mount assembly o Each brake mounting hole was loaded with a force corresponding to the brake’s torque output and the holes distance from center • Minimum factor of safety= 200 Turntable • Capable of withstanding 750 lbs, or 340 kg • Actual weight is about 40 kg per module • Factor of Safety= 8.5
  • 17. Figure X: Shaft Stress and Fatigue Strength Calculations Figure X: Drive Motor Spur Gear Stress Calculation
  • 18. Figure X: Miter Gear Stress and Force Calculation Figure X: Retaining Ring Calculations Figure X: Impact Calculations Figure X: Brake Temperature and Heat Dissipation Calculations
  • 19. Figure X: Key and Set Screw Analysis
  • 20. Figure X: Timing Belt and Pulley Analysis
  • 21. Figure X: Driven Miter Gear Keyway Analysis Figure X: Driving Miter Gear Keyway Analysis
  • 22. Figure X: Driven Pulley Keyway Analysis Figure X: Driving Pulley Keyway Analysis (Representation)
  • 23. Figure X: Driven Spur Gear Keyway Analysis Figure X: Wheel Keyway Analysis (Representation) Note: Actual wheel utilizes press fit keyway insert, thus failure during stall will result in slip of this insert, rather than the physical failure of a mechanical part
  • 24. Figure X: Yoke Displacement