Strategic Workforce Planning (SWP) is the most sought after skill in talent management today. Master this critical skill so you can move your career and your organization's objectives forward simultaneously.
In this webinar you will learn:
The essential steps in SWP
How to identify talents gaps and
Actions to take to close those gaps.
And more…
4. Receive a Complementary Critical Job Study!
Let us show you firsthand how our solutions can benefit your company.
1 2 3
Select a Critical Job! Assess Job Incumbents! Complementary Job Study!
Report designed for Performance Model
Sales & Business Development Exec.
It’s as easy as, 1, 2, 3!
5. Critical Job Study!
Identifies what is really required for success in any
given job – in terms of: (1) Learning
(2) Reasoning
(3) Communication
(4) Problem Solving
(5) Behaviors
(6) Occupational Interests
6. A Clear Target for Success…
...against which people can be graphically and
quantifiably compared, has implications for...
§ Selection
§ Development Report designed for Performance Model
Sales & Business Development Exec.
§ Coaching
§ Management
§ Succession Planning
Receive a Complementary Critical Job Study!
7. TODAY’S PRESENTER
HEINTJIE SANTOS
Assessment Solution Expert |
Country Director, Singapore
Connect with me
Heintjie.Santos@profiles.com.sg
9. STRATEGIC WORKFORCE PLANNING
Is a process that ensures that
your business has the right
people in the right jobs at the
right time to achieve your
expected results.
10. Although 92% of
companies have some level
of workforce planning,
only 21% of
companies take a strategic,
long-term approach.
Source: Bersin and Associates, Research
11. 75% of companies do
not have access to
talent data they
need to make informed
business decisions
Source: Taleo ,Talent Intelligence Report
12. The truth is that…..
it can take several months, if
not years, to get the right
14. Creating Value for Our Clients
We support our clients through the full
employee life-cycle, helping them identify the
best people for their jobs and then developing
them to their fullest potential.
The GLOBAL LEADER in
Employee Assessment Solutions
15. 700 OFFICES WORLDWIDE
The GLOBAL LEADER in
Employee Assessment &
Talent Management Solutions
Established in 1991
125 COUNTRIES
WORLDWIDE PRESENCE
16. 50 MILLION USERS
45,000 CLIENTS
33 LANGUAGES
50,000,000 MILLION USERS
17. Diverse Base of Marquee Customers
Customer Highlights
§ 11,000+ Active Customers
§ Includes Most Fortune 500 Global Companies
20. Companies Face Two Types
of Problems…
System People
Problems Problems
WE FOCUS ON PEOPLE PROBLEMS.
21. We specialize and are experts in solving people
problems in organizations
22. Challenges Most Organizations Face…
Selecting the
Right People
Customer Employee
Service Turnover
Leadership Salesforce /
Development Workforce
How about your Productivity
Organization
Succession Team
Planning Compatibility
Retention of
Top Performers
25. 1 2 3
Establish where your Understand your labor Understand your
business is going market future talent demand
4 5 6
Assess your current Identify your talent gaps and Implement your
talent inventory strategies to close them strategies
52. Interviews have a
14%
success rate in
identifying
superior people!
– Hunter & Hunter “Validity & Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance”. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 96, No. 1. p90
55. Source - Professor Mike Smith, University of Manchester, August 1994
John E. Hunter and Ronda F. Hunter, Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 96, No.1, 1984, p. 90; Robert P. Tett, Douglas N. Jackson, and Mitchell Rothstein,
Personality Measures as Predictors of Job Performance: A Meta-Analytical Review, Personnel Psychology,Winter 1991, p.703. Michigan State University’s School of Business.
56. % OF HIRING SUCCESS
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Interview Reference check
Personality Test
Abilities Test
Occupational Interest Matching
Job
Source - Professor Mike Smith, University of Manchester, August 1994
John E. Hunter and Ronda F. Hunter, Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 96, No.1, 1984, p. 90; Robert P. Tett, Douglas N. Jackson, and Mitchell Rothstein,
Personality Measures as Predictors of Job Performance: A Meta-Analytical Review, Personnel Psychology,Winter 1991, p.703. Michigan State University’s School of Business.
57. % OF HIRING SUCCESS
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20% 14%
10%
0%
Interview Reference check
Personality Test
Abilities Test
Occupational Interest Matching
Job
Source - Professor Mike Smith, University of Manchester, August 1994
John E. Hunter and Ronda F. Hunter, Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 96, No.1, 1984, p. 90; Robert P. Tett, Douglas N. Jackson, and Mitchell Rothstein,
Personality Measures as Predictors of Job Performance: A Meta-Analytical Review, Personnel Psychology,Winter 1991, p.703. Michigan State University’s School of Business.
58. % OF HIRING SUCCESS
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 26%
20% 14%
10%
0%
Interview Reference check
Personality Test
Abilities Test
Occupational Interest Matching
Job
Source - Professor Mike Smith, University of Manchester, August 1994
John E. Hunter and Ronda F. Hunter, Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 96, No.1, 1984, p. 90; Robert P. Tett, Douglas N. Jackson, and Mitchell Rothstein,
Personality Measures as Predictors of Job Performance: A Meta-Analytical Review, Personnel Psychology,Winter 1991, p.703. Michigan State University’s School of Business.
59. % OF HIRING SUCCESS
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
38%
30% 26%
20% 14%
10%
0%
Interview Reference check
Personality Test
Abilities Test
Occupational Interest Matching
Job
Source - Professor Mike Smith, University of Manchester, August 1994
John E. Hunter and Ronda F. Hunter, Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 96, No.1, 1984, p. 90; Robert P. Tett, Douglas N. Jackson, and Mitchell Rothstein,
Personality Measures as Predictors of Job Performance: A Meta-Analytical Review, Personnel Psychology,Winter 1991, p.703. Michigan State University’s School of Business.
60. % OF HIRING SUCCESS
100%
90%
80%
70%
60% 54%
50%
40%
38%
30% 26%
20% 14%
10%
0%
Interview Reference check
Personality Test
Abilities Test
Occupational Interest Matching
Job
Source - Professor Mike Smith, University of Manchester, August 1994
John E. Hunter and Ronda F. Hunter, Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 96, No.1, 1984, p. 90; Robert P. Tett, Douglas N. Jackson, and Mitchell Rothstein,
Personality Measures as Predictors of Job Performance: A Meta-Analytical Review, Personnel Psychology,Winter 1991, p.703. Michigan State University’s School of Business.
61. % OF HIRING SUCCESS
100%
90%
80%
70% 66%
60% 54%
50%
40%
38%
30% 26%
20% 14%
10%
0%
Interview Reference check
Personality Test
Abilities Test
Occupational Interest Matching
Job
Source - Professor Mike Smith, University of Manchester, August 1994
John E. Hunter and Ronda F. Hunter, Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 96, No.1, 1984, p. 90; Robert P. Tett, Douglas N. Jackson, and Mitchell Rothstein,
Personality Measures as Predictors of Job Performance: A Meta-Analytical Review, Personnel Psychology,Winter 1991, p.703. Michigan State University’s School of Business.
62. % OF HIRING SUCCESS
100%
90%
80% 75%
70% 66%
60% 54%
50%
40%
38%
30% 26%
20% 14%
10%
0%
Interview Reference check
Personality Test
Abilities Test
Occupational Interest Matching
Job
Source - Professor Mike Smith, University of Manchester, August 1994
John E. Hunter and Ronda F. Hunter, Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 96, No.1, 1984, p. 90; Robert P. Tett, Douglas N. Jackson, and Mitchell Rothstein,
Personality Measures as Predictors of Job Performance: A Meta-Analytical Review, Personnel Psychology,Winter 1991, p.703. Michigan State University’s School of Business.
67. 10% Good But Limited
Information
Education, Experience and Skills
68. 10% Good But Limited
Information
Education, Experience and Skills
90 % Essence of the
69. 10% Good But Limited
Information
Education, Experience and Skills
90 % Essence of the
“Total Person”
ü Thinking Styles
ü Behaviors
ü Occupational Interest
ü Job Fit
70.
71.
72. Cornerstones of Performance
Checking the PAST Reviewing the PRESENT
Skill Fit Company Fit
Experience, Attitudes, Values ,
Education, Demeanor,
Training, Appearance,
Certification etc. Demeanor etc.
JOB FIT
Predicting Superior Performance
73. HOW TO IDENTIFY YOUR
BENCHSTRENGHTS ?
HOW TO CONDUCT TALENT
AUDIT?
WHERE TO
START?
80. 1.
RESULTS
Build a
Performance
Model
(Success Profile)
81. 1.
RESULTS
Carefully identify OBJECTIVE measures
ü Sales Per Month, Quarter or Annum
82. 1.
RESULTS
Carefully identify OBJECTIVE measures
ü Sales Per Month, Quarter or Annum
ü Average Profit Margin Per Sale
83. 1.
RESULTS
Carefully identify OBJECTIVE measures
ü Sales Per Month, Quarter or Annum
ü Average Profit Margin Per Sale
ü Calls Handled Per Hour
84. 1.
RESULTS
Carefully identify OBJECTIVE measures
ü Sales Per Month, Quarter or Annum
ü Average Profit Margin Per Sale
ü Calls Handled Per Hour
ü Units Manufactured Per Hour
85. 1.
RESULTS
Carefully identify OBJECTIVE measures
ü Sales Per Month, Quarter or Annum
ü Average Profit Margin Per Sale
ü Calls Handled Per Hour
ü Units Manufactured Per Hour
ü Supervisors/Managers Rating etc…
95. “...(it) hinges on fit with the job…”
TOP PERFORMERS fit their jobs and:
ü Can deal with the mental demands of their
position
96. “...(it) hinges on fit with the job…”
TOP PERFORMERS fit their jobs and:
ü Can deal with the mental demands of their
position
ü Are comfortable with the demands of the
environment they work in
97. “...(it) hinges on fit with the job…”
TOP PERFORMERS fit their jobs and:
ü Can deal with the mental demands of their
position
ü Are comfortable with the demands of the
environment they work in
ü Love their job and are motivated to do it
109. 1.
RESULTS
start with your
TOP PERFORMERS
2.
POTENTIALS
110. 1.
RESULTS
start with your
TOP PERFORMERS
2.
POTENTIALS
3.
CHARACTERISTICS
111. ü Selecting people most likely to
succeed in a job Solution used throughout
ü Accelerate onboarding
the employee life-cycle
ü Clone and retain top performers
ü Target areas for development
ü Identify and lead hi-potentials
ü Enabling strategic workforce
management and succession
planning
RETURN ON INVESTMENT (ROI) / BENEFITS
112. 1. How well will the worker “fit” the new job?
Assess
“The Total Person”
113. 2. Will the worker have
the “skills” to perform
the new job?
oving in your
ent currently m
3. How is tal
organ ization?
132. 1 2 3
Establish where your Understand your labor Understand your
business is going market future talent demand
4 5 6
Assess your current Identify your talent gaps and Implement your
talent inventory strategies to close them strategies
133. HEINTJIE SANTOS
Assessment Solution Expert |
Country Director, Singapore
Connect with me
Heintjie.Santos@profiles.com.sg
THANK YOU > >
134. Receive a Complementary Critical Job Study!
Let us show you firsthand how our solutions can benefit your company.
1 2 3
Select a Critical Job! Assess Job Incumbents! Complementary Job Study!
Report designed for Performance Model
Sales & Business Development Exec.
It’s as easy as, 1, 2, 3!
135. Critical Job Study!
Identifies what is really required for success in any
given job – in terms of: (1) Learning
(2) Reasoning
(3) Communication
(4) Problem Solving
(5) Behaviors
(6) Occupational Interests
136. A Clear Target for Success…
...against which people can be graphically and
quantifiably compared, has implications for...
§ Selection
§ Development Report designed for Performance Model
Sales & Business Development Exec.
§ Coaching
§ Management
§ Succession Planning
Receive a Complementary Critical Job Study!
137. Would you like to receive a complementary
critical job study?
A. Yes
B. No
Have an immediate need ? Call us at +65 65717031
URL: www.profiles.com.sg