Enzyme, Pharmaceutical Aids, Miscellaneous Last Part of Chapter no 5th.pdf
Â
At least something for many? New pathways, greater progress: Scopes and Challenges of Community Led Total Sanitation
1. At least something for many? New pathways, greater progress Scopes and Challenges of Community Led Total Sanitation Dr. Kamal Kar CLTS Foundation, Calcutta, India Presented at the STEPS Centre Water and Sanitation Symposium March 22&23 2011
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. Fate of free toilets in a slum of a Municipality town near Calcutta, India
8. Fate of subsidized sanitation hardware- Portloko, Sierra Leone, Ibb, Yemen Whoâs design for whom?
11. X X X Moving towards 100% sanitised village P. R. A . L L L L L L L L X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Land less donât have place for defecation. Land owners often blame them for defecating in open. Landless poor (women specially) are the worst victims who want to come out of that humiliation. Participatory Planning Latrine owners canât get rid of negative impacts as many others adding faces everywhere. Spoiling environment by open defecation Will form positive pressure groups from within to convince others for having latrine Better off Medium Poor Very poor
20. â If we defecate in the open, we eat each others shit, if you donât wash your hands with ash or soap, you eat your own shitâ - a Natural Leader of CLTS from Malawi
21. Hundreds of low-cost local community-made toilets are surfacing in the rural landscape in CLTS villages in Bangladesh.
22. Whoâs idea and who's decision matters in household sanitation? South Sumatra, Indonesia
24. Great mosaic of latrine models innovated by local communities in Kampung Spu in Cambodia
25. Do we have patience to allow communities to gradually move up the Sanitation Ladder? Open defecation O 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Pour flush latrine Latrines with plastic pan and water seal Offset Pit latrines Simple Pit Latrines Sanitation behaviors changes as community moves up the ladder
26. Newly constructed toilets in Kampong Svay villages, Kampong Tralach district of Kampong Chhnang province in Cambodia - great sense of ownership and pride. Mr.Hoeun invites neighbours to use his toilet to get more manure for his crops
27. Use of ash after defecation in direct pit latrine is an innovation by the community of Skun villages of Tbeng Commune of Siem Reap province in Cambodia. One gets potash rich manure at the end. Whose idea?
32. Construction details of community innovated low-cost latrine Tin sheet, old plastic bottles and plastic sheets are used to construct such toilets
33. Locally innovated toilet model in flood prone areas and in places with high water table at Sambas, West Kalimantan
34. Stop Open Defecation All 213 H/H Repair platform of all 69 hand tube wells Clean up garbage and Repair Road Clean up drain In 5 months ten slums covering more than 800 H/Hs have stopped OD by constructing toilets mobilizing more money than what KUSP could offer as subsidy
35. Signboard declaring Open Defecation-Free, Para Vidyasagar Colony, Kalyani Municipality, West Bengal
36. BOLIVIA SIERRA LEONE NIGERIA UGANDA ZAMBIA MALAWI KENYA ETHIOPIA YEMEN TANZANIA NEPAL PAKISTAN INDIA BANGLADESH CAMBODIA INDONESIA EAST TIMOR Global Spread of CLTS Afghanistan EGYPT
39. Main Blockage of Scaling Up CLTS in Ghana CLTS Triggered Community Empowerment Hardware Household subsidy from donors Technology Prescription :Promotion of VIP/KVIP Promotion of Communal Latrines Attitudes of Traditional Chiefs towards free & subsidized communal latrines Institutional In coordination Poor coordination mechanism Focus on latrine and not ODF Villages Inadequate funding at district level for CLTS promotion
40. How V.I.P Latrine blocked scaling up and spread of CLTS Abandoned V.I.P latrines brought to use after 5 years- mostly dilapidated with broken doors and slabs Technical blockage Local Innovation Blockage Local resources& materials Blockage Dependence on external inputs & skills Most communities could not afford cost of construction of V.I.P latrine (Unit cost GHC 210) Prescription of only one technology prevented others Emergence of Innovative models that suit local environment is prevented Recycling/using of local materials in latrine building is blocked & misleading Dependence on masons/training and non-availability of cement slows down coverage
47. From Better to Best Free Latrine â FatenayiliâŚ.. Whoâs scarce resources are we wasting? Can rural Africa afford this?
48.
49. Un-intended Positive Outcome from True CLTS in Tsaondo ODF Village High Quality CLTS triggered without hard ware subsidy & Prescription Variety of latrine models emerged Low Cost materials used for latrines Local knowledge used in abundance, e.g Use of Ash, Pit Cover Community confining free roaming pigs Stopped eating dead animals Cleaned up all the bush to avoid bush fire/No more snake bite/Reduced malaria cases Songs developed to stop OD Daily change of d/water; Hand washing b4 eating; Cleaning up for kids Right understanding of CLTS by Mr. Yahaya (DEHO) â Recipient of proper Hands-on training (Otukpo, Nigeria) contributed to the excellent outcome
52. How Communal Latrines block the spread and scaling up of CLTS Communal Latrines Not properly maintained Breeding factory for flies Mainly Fixed Point Open Defecation Not appropriate for emergency defecation, hence contributes to OD Blocks construction & use of HH latrines Blocks innovation and creativity to stop OD Often requires external technical support High frequency of collapse Collapse of communal latrines major reason for returning back to OD Difficult to sustain ODF with Communal latrines Communal latrines are Unimproved facilities and not regarded as Access to Improved Sanitation (WHO/UNICEF JMP Report)