SOME SCHOOL ORAL
HEALTH PROGRAMS
“Learning about your oral health”-a
prevention oriented school program
 Comprehensive program
covering current dental concepts
 1971 ADA House of delegates
 Primary Goal :
 is to develop the knowledge ,
skills and attitudes needed for
prevention of dental diseases
among school children
 Increase knowledge regarding diet and
dental health , stressing on the relationship
of sugar , starch, and caries
 Significance of fluoride , oral safety ,
consumer health concepts , the role of
dental professionals and the relationship of
oral health with total health
 IMPLEMENTATION
 Preschool ( designed for children too young
to read )
 Level 1 (kindergarten through grade 3)
 Level 11 (grades 4 through 6)
 Level 111 (grades 7 through 9)
 Level 1V (grades 10 through 12)
 Teaching packet includes :
 A teacher’s self –contained guide on dental
health facts with a section on handicapped
children
 A glossary of dental health terms
 a curriculum guide featuring content, goals ,
behavioral objectives and suggested
activities for other classes
 5 lesson plans for preschool and 7/more for
other levels
 4 overhead transparencies
 12 spirit masters
 Methods and activities for parental and
involvement
 Printed material and films about awareness
of the hazards of tobacco usage
 Evaluation:
 Dr. Oliver L Ezell in 1947
 It was found that the program influenced
favorably the oral health behavior than did
the traditional approach to oral health
education and effected favorable changes
in attitudes towards oral health practices
“TATTLETOOTH PROGRAM”-TEXAS
statewide preventive dentistry program
 In 1974-76 between the Texas dental health
professional organizations , the Texas
department of health and the Texas education
agency
 In 1989 the Bureau of dental health developed
a new program to replace this – Tattletooth 11
 3 video tapes were produced as part of
teacher- training package
 Consists of brushing and flossing, brochure
that provided an overview of the program
 A school nurse’s brochure
 A 2 hour training session using the materials in
the new curriculum was televised to the
schools via a video network
 Philosophy and goals:
 Six elements :
 1. anticipatory set
 2. setting the objective
 3. input modeling
 4.checking for understanding
 5. guided practice
 6. independent practice
 Implementation
 Hygienists instruct teachers using
videotapes designed for teacher training
and provide them with a copy of the
curriculum
 Health promotion activities are encouraged
and publicized within the school community
 Teachers are encouraged to invite a dental
professional to demonstrate correct
brushing and flossing in the classroom
 Importance of safety and factual information
relating to dental disease , its causes and
preventive tecniques
 Evaluation :
 Students in the grades 3,5,7,9 and 11 were
assessed by the Texas education agency
 Teacher evaluation is done annually by
principals and supervisors using a 65 – item
checklist
 Dental health knowledge was significantly
increased at all grades
 Plaque levels were decreased by 15% in a
randomly selected sample of 2,142 children
 Over 80% of the teachers judged the
program to be helpful and effective , by
1989 it was about 94%
ASKOV DENTAL DEMONSTRATION
 Small farming community with a population
mostly of Danish extraction
 1n 1949-57 the Minnesota department of
health supervised a demonstration of
school dental health program in Askov
 All methods for preventing dental caries
were used with the exception of communal
water fluoridation
 Findings through a 10 year period :
 28% reduction in dental caries in deciduous
teeth of children aged 3 to 5 years
 34% reduction in caries in the permanent
teeth of children 6 to 12 years old
 14% reduction in permanent teeth of
children 13 to 17 years old
 Improvements in filled – tooth ratios
 Benefits like good health and dietary habits
for the children to carry on to adult life
NORTH CAROLINA STATEWIDE
PREVENTIVE DENTAL HEALTH
PROGRAM
 1973 Frank .E. Law prepared a report for
the north Carolina dental society that
defined the extent of the dental disease
problem
 A steering committee developed a practical
plan for a program in the schools
 North carolina preventive dentistry program
for children (NCPDPC)
 Philosophy and goals:
 Young children are the primary focus for
education because the earlier a child is
reached, the greater the potential for
positively affecting the child’s attitudes ,
values and behavior.
 Objectives:
 Appropriate use of fluoride
 Health education in schools and
communities
 Availability of public health dental staff in all
counties
 Implementation:
 In the year 1990, services delivered through
the program included;
 The fluoridation of water supplies of 130
rural schools
 Weekly fluoride mouth rinse for more than
4,16,000 students in 1,051schools
 Screening and referral for more than
3,39,000 children
 Dental health education was presented
 More than 33,000 dental sealants were
applied
 Evaluation:
 Is a necessary ongoing process to measure
the effectiveness of the dental health
program
 34% reduction in decayed , missing and
filled teeth among children who had 8 years
experience drinking fluoridated water at
school
 53% reduction in decayed, missing and
filled permanent teeth among children who
had 10 years experience drinking
fluoridated water
 86% reduction in dental caries after 4 years
of sealant use on permanent teeth
Head start – pre-school dental health
program
 United states department of health and
human services initiated in 1965
 Focuses on assisting children from low
income families
 Longest- running program for stopping the
cycle of poverty
 Provides comprehensive education, health,
nutrition , and parent involvement services
to low income children and their families
School health additional referral
program (SHARP)
 Started in Philadelphia
 Purpose of motivating parents into initiating
action for correction of defects in their
children through effective utilization of
community resources
 The one-to-one basis of health guidance
between parent and health worker
established better rapport between school
and home
Teenage health education teaching
assistants program (THETA program)
 By national foundation for the prevention of
oral disease for the US department of
health and welfare , division of dental health
 Philosophy & goals:
 Dental personnel train high school children
to teach preventive dentistry to elementary
school children
 To give knowledge & skills to young
children
 Allows high school children to develop
understanding of young children
 Introduces them to career opportunities
Colgate’s bright smiles , bright futures
 By IDA
 This program emphasize the
importance of oral health as part of a
child’s overall physical and emotional
development
 Teacher’s training program , education
imparted with the aid of audio-visuals
and printed literature
World health organization’s (WHO’s)
global school health initiative
 Launched in 1995
 The initiative is designed to improve the
health of students , school personnel,
families and other members of the
community through schools
 Strategies :
 Research to improve school
health programs
 Building capacity to advocate for
improved school health programs
:
 Technical documents are generated
that consolidate research and expert
opinion about the nature , scope and
effectiveness of school health
programs
 Strengthening national capacities :
 Collaboration between health and educational
agencies is fostered and countries are helped to
develop strategies and programs to improve health
through schools
 Creating network and alliances for the
development of health promoting schools:
 Goal of WHO’s global school health initiative is to
increase the number of schools that can truly be
called health promoting schools( school constantly
strengthening its capacity as a healthy setting for
living , learning and working )
 Health promoting schools focus on :
 Caring for oneself and others
 Making healthy decisions and taking control
over life’s circumstances
 Creating conditions that are conducive to
health
 Building capacities for peace, shelter ,
education, food , income , a stable
ecosystem , equity , social justice ,
sustainable development
 Preventing leading causes of death ,
disease and disability
 Influencing health- related behaviors
Conclusion
◦ School oral health program should not
impose an excess or unusual teaching
burden on the teachers , it should be cost
effective in man power , money and
material and it should produce observable
results
◦ Since children are often the most
important victims of dental diseases ,
programs aimed at dental health of the
school children are of great importance in
promoting oral health of the community
 REFERENCES
Some school oral health programs

Some school oral health programs

  • 1.
  • 2.
    “Learning about youroral health”-a prevention oriented school program  Comprehensive program covering current dental concepts  1971 ADA House of delegates  Primary Goal :  is to develop the knowledge , skills and attitudes needed for prevention of dental diseases among school children
  • 3.
     Increase knowledgeregarding diet and dental health , stressing on the relationship of sugar , starch, and caries  Significance of fluoride , oral safety , consumer health concepts , the role of dental professionals and the relationship of oral health with total health
  • 4.
     IMPLEMENTATION  Preschool( designed for children too young to read )  Level 1 (kindergarten through grade 3)  Level 11 (grades 4 through 6)  Level 111 (grades 7 through 9)  Level 1V (grades 10 through 12)  Teaching packet includes :  A teacher’s self –contained guide on dental health facts with a section on handicapped children  A glossary of dental health terms
  • 5.
     a curriculumguide featuring content, goals , behavioral objectives and suggested activities for other classes  5 lesson plans for preschool and 7/more for other levels  4 overhead transparencies  12 spirit masters  Methods and activities for parental and involvement  Printed material and films about awareness of the hazards of tobacco usage
  • 6.
     Evaluation:  Dr.Oliver L Ezell in 1947  It was found that the program influenced favorably the oral health behavior than did the traditional approach to oral health education and effected favorable changes in attitudes towards oral health practices
  • 7.
    “TATTLETOOTH PROGRAM”-TEXAS statewide preventivedentistry program  In 1974-76 between the Texas dental health professional organizations , the Texas department of health and the Texas education agency  In 1989 the Bureau of dental health developed a new program to replace this – Tattletooth 11  3 video tapes were produced as part of teacher- training package  Consists of brushing and flossing, brochure that provided an overview of the program  A school nurse’s brochure  A 2 hour training session using the materials in the new curriculum was televised to the schools via a video network
  • 8.
     Philosophy andgoals:  Six elements :  1. anticipatory set  2. setting the objective  3. input modeling  4.checking for understanding  5. guided practice  6. independent practice
  • 9.
     Implementation  Hygienistsinstruct teachers using videotapes designed for teacher training and provide them with a copy of the curriculum  Health promotion activities are encouraged and publicized within the school community  Teachers are encouraged to invite a dental professional to demonstrate correct brushing and flossing in the classroom  Importance of safety and factual information relating to dental disease , its causes and preventive tecniques
  • 10.
     Evaluation : Students in the grades 3,5,7,9 and 11 were assessed by the Texas education agency  Teacher evaluation is done annually by principals and supervisors using a 65 – item checklist  Dental health knowledge was significantly increased at all grades  Plaque levels were decreased by 15% in a randomly selected sample of 2,142 children  Over 80% of the teachers judged the program to be helpful and effective , by 1989 it was about 94%
  • 11.
    ASKOV DENTAL DEMONSTRATION Small farming community with a population mostly of Danish extraction  1n 1949-57 the Minnesota department of health supervised a demonstration of school dental health program in Askov  All methods for preventing dental caries were used with the exception of communal water fluoridation  Findings through a 10 year period :  28% reduction in dental caries in deciduous teeth of children aged 3 to 5 years
  • 12.
     34% reductionin caries in the permanent teeth of children 6 to 12 years old  14% reduction in permanent teeth of children 13 to 17 years old  Improvements in filled – tooth ratios  Benefits like good health and dietary habits for the children to carry on to adult life
  • 13.
    NORTH CAROLINA STATEWIDE PREVENTIVEDENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM  1973 Frank .E. Law prepared a report for the north Carolina dental society that defined the extent of the dental disease problem  A steering committee developed a practical plan for a program in the schools  North carolina preventive dentistry program for children (NCPDPC)
  • 14.
     Philosophy andgoals:  Young children are the primary focus for education because the earlier a child is reached, the greater the potential for positively affecting the child’s attitudes , values and behavior.  Objectives:  Appropriate use of fluoride  Health education in schools and communities  Availability of public health dental staff in all counties
  • 15.
     Implementation:  Inthe year 1990, services delivered through the program included;  The fluoridation of water supplies of 130 rural schools  Weekly fluoride mouth rinse for more than 4,16,000 students in 1,051schools  Screening and referral for more than 3,39,000 children  Dental health education was presented  More than 33,000 dental sealants were applied
  • 16.
     Evaluation:  Isa necessary ongoing process to measure the effectiveness of the dental health program  34% reduction in decayed , missing and filled teeth among children who had 8 years experience drinking fluoridated water at school  53% reduction in decayed, missing and filled permanent teeth among children who had 10 years experience drinking fluoridated water  86% reduction in dental caries after 4 years of sealant use on permanent teeth
  • 17.
    Head start –pre-school dental health program  United states department of health and human services initiated in 1965  Focuses on assisting children from low income families  Longest- running program for stopping the cycle of poverty  Provides comprehensive education, health, nutrition , and parent involvement services to low income children and their families
  • 18.
    School health additionalreferral program (SHARP)  Started in Philadelphia  Purpose of motivating parents into initiating action for correction of defects in their children through effective utilization of community resources  The one-to-one basis of health guidance between parent and health worker established better rapport between school and home
  • 19.
    Teenage health educationteaching assistants program (THETA program)  By national foundation for the prevention of oral disease for the US department of health and welfare , division of dental health  Philosophy & goals:  Dental personnel train high school children to teach preventive dentistry to elementary school children  To give knowledge & skills to young children  Allows high school children to develop understanding of young children  Introduces them to career opportunities
  • 20.
    Colgate’s bright smiles, bright futures  By IDA  This program emphasize the importance of oral health as part of a child’s overall physical and emotional development  Teacher’s training program , education imparted with the aid of audio-visuals and printed literature
  • 21.
    World health organization’s(WHO’s) global school health initiative  Launched in 1995  The initiative is designed to improve the health of students , school personnel, families and other members of the community through schools
  • 22.
     Strategies : Research to improve school health programs  Building capacity to advocate for improved school health programs :  Technical documents are generated that consolidate research and expert opinion about the nature , scope and effectiveness of school health programs
  • 23.
     Strengthening nationalcapacities :  Collaboration between health and educational agencies is fostered and countries are helped to develop strategies and programs to improve health through schools  Creating network and alliances for the development of health promoting schools:  Goal of WHO’s global school health initiative is to increase the number of schools that can truly be called health promoting schools( school constantly strengthening its capacity as a healthy setting for living , learning and working )
  • 24.
     Health promotingschools focus on :  Caring for oneself and others  Making healthy decisions and taking control over life’s circumstances  Creating conditions that are conducive to health  Building capacities for peace, shelter , education, food , income , a stable ecosystem , equity , social justice , sustainable development  Preventing leading causes of death , disease and disability  Influencing health- related behaviors
  • 25.
    Conclusion ◦ School oralhealth program should not impose an excess or unusual teaching burden on the teachers , it should be cost effective in man power , money and material and it should produce observable results ◦ Since children are often the most important victims of dental diseases , programs aimed at dental health of the school children are of great importance in promoting oral health of the community
  • 26.