Second Language Acquisition
First Language Acquisition Theories 
The “bones” you must know about First Language Acquisition
3 
BF Skinner 
1957, Behavioral Learning Theory 
Behavioral Learning Theory: language is 
learned through reinforcement. Language 
learning is the result of forming new 
habits. 
STIMULUS: (Behavioral Theory) parents 
modeling language. 
RESPONSE: response(Behavioral Theory) 
child copies language. 
REINFORCEMENT: (Behavioral Theory) 
parents understand child's language + 
give praise OR parents don't understand 
and correct. 
Flaw of Skinner's Behavioral Theory 
of Learning 
This theory couldn't explain how children 
come up with "novel utterances," which 
are sentences or phrases that no one has 
ever said in their presence.
4 
Jean Piaget 
Cognitive Development theory 
Language learning is a cognitive activity. 
Cognitive acts organize children's 
environment and are the result of 
children's adaption to their environment. 
Language itself is no innate, language 
emerges as a product of cognitive 
organization and development. 
Language is only one of the several skills 
we develop these emerges as a 
consequence of gonitive maturation. 
Piaget believed that language can be 
used to represent knowledge that 
children have acquired through physical 
interaction with the environment. 
Schema: everything I 
know and have 
experienced in life. It’s 
my prior knowledge. 
Our schema helps us 
make meaning and 
understand what we 
read. 
Our schema grows and 
changes as we have 
more life experiences. 
When we use our 
schema you think about 
what you already know.
5 
Lev Vigotsky 
Socio-cultural theory 
Social interaction plays an important role 
in the learning process and proposed the 
zone of proximal development (ZPD). 
The Zone of Proximal Development 
The gap between what a child knows and 
is able to do alone and what the child can 
do with help. It's also the ability of a child 
to solve problems on their own. 
In the classroom: 
Range of tasks too difficult for the child to 
do alone but possible with the help of 
adults and more skilled peers. 
Task is still difficult for the child, but a 
mentor teaches the child different 
problem solving methods 
Scaffolding: scaffolding 
adjusting the support 
offered during a 
teaching session to fit 
the child's current level 
of performance. 
View of make-believe 
play: children advance 
themselves as they try 
out a wide variety of 
challenging skills 
Educational views about 
assisted discovery: 
child should discover, 
but also be lead to 
discover. 
Teachers prompt, peer 
collaboration, use 
reciprocal teaching, or 
cooperative learning 
Main 
Concepts 
of 
Vigotsky’s 
theory
6 
Second Language Acquisition 
"Why is it important for language teachers to know about language acquisition?" 
Manfred Pienemann (1995) points out that 
the study of SLA takes the perspective of 
focusing on the learner rather than the 
learning environment. 
Looking at the learner and the language 
acquisition processes provides information on 
what learners normally do or do not do and 
what can and cannot be taught. 
Based on normal patterns of acquisition, 
teachers should be able to evaluate where 
their students are in the acquisition process. 
The study of SLA will also enable teachers 
to examine a syllabus to determine if the 
content is geared towards the learner's 
level of ability. Pienamann states: "It is 
important to know what is learnable at 
what point in time" (1995, p. 4).
7 
Second Language Acquisition 
What does SLA offer to teachers of ESL/EFL? 
SLA offers teachers a reminder that 
appropriate input, output, and 
interaction are all crucial to L2 learning. 
Research on L2 learning and instruction reveals that 
to be successful learners need both rich and 
varied input in the target language and 
opportunities to use the language (VanPatten, 
2003). 
SLA offers teachers guidelines or suggestions 
for what to focus on in our teaching. It offers an 
interesting perspective on the role of the teacher in 
a classroom context, stating that to teach is only 
one of the instructor’s four main jobs, with the other 
three being to plan appropriate lessons, to train 
students in language skills, and to test their 
progress.
8 
Second Language Acquisition 
The process by which people learn a second language 
Second language acquisition theory 
derives from theories of first language 
acquisition and what we know about how 
children become fluent speakers of their 
native languages in a relatively short 
period of time. 
We have evidence that children learn 
languages by figuring out a set of rules 
that govern that language. We have 
similar evidence that nonnative speakers 
learn a second language by engaging in a 
similar process. 
This evidence includes children's and 
English language learners’ tendency to 
overgeneralize rules and overextend word 
meanings. 
Examples: "You no see me 
ball?" for "Do you see my ball?“ 
Second Language 
Learner: "You no tired?” for 
“You are not tired?” 
Overgeneralization of 
rules: "I drived the car” for “I 
drove the car.”
9 
Second Language Acquisition 
The process by which people learn a second language 
This second language learner probably 
never heard anyone say drived for 
drove, yet she has learned that adding 
an -ed ending to a base word usually 
forms the past tense form. This 
knowledge enables her to create her own 
sentences by overgeneralizing the 
grammar rule. Sentences like this one 
demonstrate that second language 
learners are figuring out rules and 
learning language. Children learning their 
first languages make very similar errors. 
Overgeneralization of 
rules: "I drived the car” for “I 
drove the car.”
10 
Second Language Acquisition 
First Language Acquisition vs. Second Language Acquisition 
Similarities: Differences: 
Both require a great deal of time. Second language acquisition is built on a prior 
understanding of how language works. 
Each type of acquisition includes automatic and 
monitored processes. 
Second language learners may learn languages for 
many different reasons, unlike first language 
learners who need to learn for survival. 
Comprehension generally precedes production 
of language forms. 
Second language learners may start the process of 
language acquisition at any age. 
Each involves a process of figuring out 
language rules. 
Second language acquisition involves more 
conscious thought than first language acquisition. 
Language is learned through observation and 
practice in communicative interactions. 
Errors made by first language acquirers are 
generally accepted and frequently not corrected 
whereas errors made by second language acquirers 
are often corrected. 
Some aspects of language are learned before 
others. 
First language acquirers are usually in a supportive 
and warm environment with plenty of contextual 
cues ideal for language acquisition whereas second 
language acquirers may not be. 
Errors are a natural part of language 
acquisition.
11 
Second Language Acquisition 
The process by which people learn a second language 
In the classroom: Teacher should know in 
which stage a student is at. 
This will allow the teacher to better assist 
the student. 
Process of second language acquisition 
(Developed by Stephen Krashen). 
6 stages: 
1. Pre-production 
2. Early production 
3. Speech Emergence 
4. Beginning fluency 
5. Intermediate fluency 
6. Advanced fluency
12 
Second Language Acquisition 
Theories 
Eric Lenneberg 
“The Critical Period Hypothesis” 
Eric Lenneberg, 1967; main idea = There 
is a certain window of opportunity (critical 
period) humans have to learn language. 
Language has to be learned before 
puberty. 
L2 is best learned between age 2 and 
puberty. 
In the classroom: this critical window 
applies to the elementary students the 
most. 
Develop vocabulary and language by 
showing words with pictures. 
In the 1960s
13 
Second Language Acquisition 
Theories 
Noam Chomsky 
Chomsky’s theory of human language was 
centered around his concept of Universal 
Grammar (UG). 
(Chomsky) Innate linguistic knowledge which 
consists of a set of principles common to all 
languages/that we are born 
witheverything we need to 
learnevery language. 
All humans rests on innate building 
blocks and expression. All share 3 
things: 
a) Nouns 
b) Verbs 
c) Adjectives 
In the classroom: 
Breaking sentences into the 3 basic parts will 
help students understand meaning to 
concepts. 
In the 1970s 
Noam Chomsky “Nativist 
Theory” 
language is innate (we are 
born with the brain structure 
to know all languages and 
their features)
14 
Krashen’s 5 Hypotheses 
Second Language Acquisition
15 
Second Language Acquisition 
Theories 
Stephen Krashen (1988) has a five-part 
hypothesis explaining second language 
acquisition which includes the following 
elements: 
1) A low affective filter so that language 
input can be received. The affective filter 
can be thought of as a wall that is present 
around the learner. If that wall is too high 
because of stress, anxiety or some other 
kind of discomfort, then language learning 
cannot take place. 
In the classroom: 
It is the role of the teacher to structure 
a classroom environment and 
atmosphere that lowers that wall 
around second language learners so 
that acquisition of language can take 
place. 
Motivating my students in everything 
they will learn related to a second 
language. 
In the 1980s 
Children don't get embarrassed in the same 
ways that adults do, so the Affective Filter 
doesn't get as high in children. For example, 
adults may place very high expectations on 
themselves, and when they are not met, emotions 
run high. Teachers of children are more willing 
to supplement lessons with large amounts of 
realia, manipulatives, visuals, and props than 
teachers of adults students are, so children get more 
comprehensible input.
16 
Second Language Acquisition 
Theories 
Stephen Krashen 
2) Input Hypothesis 
We all acquire language the same way and one 
way only. We acquire when we understand the 
message. 
In the classroom: 
Drawing pictures is a great way to help students 
understand the message =(Comprehensible 
input) 
It is important What people say, not HOW 
they say it! 
If too much new linguistic information is 
given too quickly, then there is little chance 
that language acquisition will take place since 
the learner will confused and overwhelmed. 
The class planning will be crucial to provide a 
better experience with the language and thus 
get improved results in communication.
17 
Second Language Acquisition 
Theories 
Stephen Krashen’s Monitor 
Hypothesis 
3) That language students have an 
internal error-detector that allows them 
to check for the accuracy of their speech 
production 
In the classroom: Teacher must reduce 
correction of errors an allow freedom to 
speak even if students are committing 
errors, errors are an essential part of 
language.
18 
Second Language Acquisition 
Theories 
Stephen Krashen 
4) A natural order of language 
acquisition exists. This indicates that 
certain grammar features will be learned 
in a sequential and predictable way 
among second language acquirers. 
In order to become a fluent language 
user, language must 
be acquired naturally (as in first 
language acquisition) rather 
than learned traditionally (as in school, 
memorization of rules, excessive error 
correction). 
In the classroom: Giving my students 
gradually the target language 
exposure.
19 
Second Language Acquisition 
Theories 
Jim Cummins 
Cummins theory states that there are 
three aspects of English language 
proficiency. 
Basic Interpersonal Communicative skills 
(BICS), Discrete Language Skills (DLS), 
and Cognitive Academic Language 
Proficiency (CALPS). 
BICS=everyday language necessary to 
communicate with family and friends. 
DLS are the rules governing aspects of 
language. 
CALPS is our ability to interpret and to 
produce increasingly complex aspects of 
the language. Takes at least five years. 
CALP=Language needed to discuss and 
understand content in classroom. 
Students may be fluent when 
speaking with friends but may be 
poor academically. 
In the Classroom: a great way to help 
students master CALP is by 
encouraging reading and writing of 
content related texts. 
We should not assume that non-native 
speakers who have attained a 
high degree of fluency and accuracy 
in everyday spoken English have the 
corresponding academic language 
proficiency.
20 
References 
Hall, C., Smith, P., & Wicaksono, R. (2011, January 1). A brief introduction to 
some of the main themes in Second Language Acquisition research. Retrieved 
October 11, 2014, from 
http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/hall/downloads/sla.pdf 
Hall, M., & Rentz, P. (2002, March 1). Applying SLA Research and Theory To 
Practice: What Can a Teacher Do? Retrieved October 13, 2014, from 
http://www.tesl-ej.org/ej20/a2.html 
Language Acquisition. (2011, January 1). Retrieved October 11, 2014, from 
http://faculty.scf.edu/sharric/lesson11/lesson11topic3.htm 
Lessard-Clouston, M. (2007, January 1). SLA: What It Offers ESL/EFL Teachers. 
Retrieved October 14, 2014, from http://www.catesol.org/07Lessard- 
Clouston.pdf 
First Language Acquisition. Retrieve October, 14, from: 
http://emedia.leeward.hawaii.edu/hurley/Ling102web/mod5_Llearning/5mo 
d5.3_acquisition.htm

Second language acquisition

  • 1.
  • 2.
    First Language AcquisitionTheories The “bones” you must know about First Language Acquisition
  • 3.
    3 BF Skinner 1957, Behavioral Learning Theory Behavioral Learning Theory: language is learned through reinforcement. Language learning is the result of forming new habits. STIMULUS: (Behavioral Theory) parents modeling language. RESPONSE: response(Behavioral Theory) child copies language. REINFORCEMENT: (Behavioral Theory) parents understand child's language + give praise OR parents don't understand and correct. Flaw of Skinner's Behavioral Theory of Learning This theory couldn't explain how children come up with "novel utterances," which are sentences or phrases that no one has ever said in their presence.
  • 4.
    4 Jean Piaget Cognitive Development theory Language learning is a cognitive activity. Cognitive acts organize children's environment and are the result of children's adaption to their environment. Language itself is no innate, language emerges as a product of cognitive organization and development. Language is only one of the several skills we develop these emerges as a consequence of gonitive maturation. Piaget believed that language can be used to represent knowledge that children have acquired through physical interaction with the environment. Schema: everything I know and have experienced in life. It’s my prior knowledge. Our schema helps us make meaning and understand what we read. Our schema grows and changes as we have more life experiences. When we use our schema you think about what you already know.
  • 5.
    5 Lev Vigotsky Socio-cultural theory Social interaction plays an important role in the learning process and proposed the zone of proximal development (ZPD). The Zone of Proximal Development The gap between what a child knows and is able to do alone and what the child can do with help. It's also the ability of a child to solve problems on their own. In the classroom: Range of tasks too difficult for the child to do alone but possible with the help of adults and more skilled peers. Task is still difficult for the child, but a mentor teaches the child different problem solving methods Scaffolding: scaffolding adjusting the support offered during a teaching session to fit the child's current level of performance. View of make-believe play: children advance themselves as they try out a wide variety of challenging skills Educational views about assisted discovery: child should discover, but also be lead to discover. Teachers prompt, peer collaboration, use reciprocal teaching, or cooperative learning Main Concepts of Vigotsky’s theory
  • 6.
    6 Second LanguageAcquisition "Why is it important for language teachers to know about language acquisition?" Manfred Pienemann (1995) points out that the study of SLA takes the perspective of focusing on the learner rather than the learning environment. Looking at the learner and the language acquisition processes provides information on what learners normally do or do not do and what can and cannot be taught. Based on normal patterns of acquisition, teachers should be able to evaluate where their students are in the acquisition process. The study of SLA will also enable teachers to examine a syllabus to determine if the content is geared towards the learner's level of ability. Pienamann states: "It is important to know what is learnable at what point in time" (1995, p. 4).
  • 7.
    7 Second LanguageAcquisition What does SLA offer to teachers of ESL/EFL? SLA offers teachers a reminder that appropriate input, output, and interaction are all crucial to L2 learning. Research on L2 learning and instruction reveals that to be successful learners need both rich and varied input in the target language and opportunities to use the language (VanPatten, 2003). SLA offers teachers guidelines or suggestions for what to focus on in our teaching. It offers an interesting perspective on the role of the teacher in a classroom context, stating that to teach is only one of the instructor’s four main jobs, with the other three being to plan appropriate lessons, to train students in language skills, and to test their progress.
  • 8.
    8 Second LanguageAcquisition The process by which people learn a second language Second language acquisition theory derives from theories of first language acquisition and what we know about how children become fluent speakers of their native languages in a relatively short period of time. We have evidence that children learn languages by figuring out a set of rules that govern that language. We have similar evidence that nonnative speakers learn a second language by engaging in a similar process. This evidence includes children's and English language learners’ tendency to overgeneralize rules and overextend word meanings. Examples: "You no see me ball?" for "Do you see my ball?“ Second Language Learner: "You no tired?” for “You are not tired?” Overgeneralization of rules: "I drived the car” for “I drove the car.”
  • 9.
    9 Second LanguageAcquisition The process by which people learn a second language This second language learner probably never heard anyone say drived for drove, yet she has learned that adding an -ed ending to a base word usually forms the past tense form. This knowledge enables her to create her own sentences by overgeneralizing the grammar rule. Sentences like this one demonstrate that second language learners are figuring out rules and learning language. Children learning their first languages make very similar errors. Overgeneralization of rules: "I drived the car” for “I drove the car.”
  • 10.
    10 Second LanguageAcquisition First Language Acquisition vs. Second Language Acquisition Similarities: Differences: Both require a great deal of time. Second language acquisition is built on a prior understanding of how language works. Each type of acquisition includes automatic and monitored processes. Second language learners may learn languages for many different reasons, unlike first language learners who need to learn for survival. Comprehension generally precedes production of language forms. Second language learners may start the process of language acquisition at any age. Each involves a process of figuring out language rules. Second language acquisition involves more conscious thought than first language acquisition. Language is learned through observation and practice in communicative interactions. Errors made by first language acquirers are generally accepted and frequently not corrected whereas errors made by second language acquirers are often corrected. Some aspects of language are learned before others. First language acquirers are usually in a supportive and warm environment with plenty of contextual cues ideal for language acquisition whereas second language acquirers may not be. Errors are a natural part of language acquisition.
  • 11.
    11 Second LanguageAcquisition The process by which people learn a second language In the classroom: Teacher should know in which stage a student is at. This will allow the teacher to better assist the student. Process of second language acquisition (Developed by Stephen Krashen). 6 stages: 1. Pre-production 2. Early production 3. Speech Emergence 4. Beginning fluency 5. Intermediate fluency 6. Advanced fluency
  • 12.
    12 Second LanguageAcquisition Theories Eric Lenneberg “The Critical Period Hypothesis” Eric Lenneberg, 1967; main idea = There is a certain window of opportunity (critical period) humans have to learn language. Language has to be learned before puberty. L2 is best learned between age 2 and puberty. In the classroom: this critical window applies to the elementary students the most. Develop vocabulary and language by showing words with pictures. In the 1960s
  • 13.
    13 Second LanguageAcquisition Theories Noam Chomsky Chomsky’s theory of human language was centered around his concept of Universal Grammar (UG). (Chomsky) Innate linguistic knowledge which consists of a set of principles common to all languages/that we are born witheverything we need to learnevery language. All humans rests on innate building blocks and expression. All share 3 things: a) Nouns b) Verbs c) Adjectives In the classroom: Breaking sentences into the 3 basic parts will help students understand meaning to concepts. In the 1970s Noam Chomsky “Nativist Theory” language is innate (we are born with the brain structure to know all languages and their features)
  • 14.
    14 Krashen’s 5Hypotheses Second Language Acquisition
  • 15.
    15 Second LanguageAcquisition Theories Stephen Krashen (1988) has a five-part hypothesis explaining second language acquisition which includes the following elements: 1) A low affective filter so that language input can be received. The affective filter can be thought of as a wall that is present around the learner. If that wall is too high because of stress, anxiety or some other kind of discomfort, then language learning cannot take place. In the classroom: It is the role of the teacher to structure a classroom environment and atmosphere that lowers that wall around second language learners so that acquisition of language can take place. Motivating my students in everything they will learn related to a second language. In the 1980s Children don't get embarrassed in the same ways that adults do, so the Affective Filter doesn't get as high in children. For example, adults may place very high expectations on themselves, and when they are not met, emotions run high. Teachers of children are more willing to supplement lessons with large amounts of realia, manipulatives, visuals, and props than teachers of adults students are, so children get more comprehensible input.
  • 16.
    16 Second LanguageAcquisition Theories Stephen Krashen 2) Input Hypothesis We all acquire language the same way and one way only. We acquire when we understand the message. In the classroom: Drawing pictures is a great way to help students understand the message =(Comprehensible input) It is important What people say, not HOW they say it! If too much new linguistic information is given too quickly, then there is little chance that language acquisition will take place since the learner will confused and overwhelmed. The class planning will be crucial to provide a better experience with the language and thus get improved results in communication.
  • 17.
    17 Second LanguageAcquisition Theories Stephen Krashen’s Monitor Hypothesis 3) That language students have an internal error-detector that allows them to check for the accuracy of their speech production In the classroom: Teacher must reduce correction of errors an allow freedom to speak even if students are committing errors, errors are an essential part of language.
  • 18.
    18 Second LanguageAcquisition Theories Stephen Krashen 4) A natural order of language acquisition exists. This indicates that certain grammar features will be learned in a sequential and predictable way among second language acquirers. In order to become a fluent language user, language must be acquired naturally (as in first language acquisition) rather than learned traditionally (as in school, memorization of rules, excessive error correction). In the classroom: Giving my students gradually the target language exposure.
  • 19.
    19 Second LanguageAcquisition Theories Jim Cummins Cummins theory states that there are three aspects of English language proficiency. Basic Interpersonal Communicative skills (BICS), Discrete Language Skills (DLS), and Cognitive Academic Language Proficiency (CALPS). BICS=everyday language necessary to communicate with family and friends. DLS are the rules governing aspects of language. CALPS is our ability to interpret and to produce increasingly complex aspects of the language. Takes at least five years. CALP=Language needed to discuss and understand content in classroom. Students may be fluent when speaking with friends but may be poor academically. In the Classroom: a great way to help students master CALP is by encouraging reading and writing of content related texts. We should not assume that non-native speakers who have attained a high degree of fluency and accuracy in everyday spoken English have the corresponding academic language proficiency.
  • 20.
    20 References Hall,C., Smith, P., & Wicaksono, R. (2011, January 1). A brief introduction to some of the main themes in Second Language Acquisition research. Retrieved October 11, 2014, from http://cw.routledge.com/textbooks/hall/downloads/sla.pdf Hall, M., & Rentz, P. (2002, March 1). Applying SLA Research and Theory To Practice: What Can a Teacher Do? Retrieved October 13, 2014, from http://www.tesl-ej.org/ej20/a2.html Language Acquisition. (2011, January 1). Retrieved October 11, 2014, from http://faculty.scf.edu/sharric/lesson11/lesson11topic3.htm Lessard-Clouston, M. (2007, January 1). SLA: What It Offers ESL/EFL Teachers. Retrieved October 14, 2014, from http://www.catesol.org/07Lessard- Clouston.pdf First Language Acquisition. Retrieve October, 14, from: http://emedia.leeward.hawaii.edu/hurley/Ling102web/mod5_Llearning/5mo d5.3_acquisition.htm