RV 2014: Transit + MPO = Partners for Livable Communities by Todd Hemingson, AICP
Transit + MPO = Partners for Livable Communities MAP-21 (Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act) implementation has given public transportation a greater role in transportation planning and programming decisions. How can transit, MPOs and cities foster decision-making partnerships to attain the best mix of integrated mobility solutions? What are the most effective strategies (including scenario planning) for advancing livable and sustainable communities? Moderator: James D. Parsons, AICP, Vice President, US West Transit Rail Market Sector Lead, AECOM, Seattle, Washington Sean Libberton, Principal, PB Strategic Consulting, Washington, DC Ted Knowlton, AICP, Deputy Director, Wasatch Front Regional Council, Salt Lake City, Utah Matthew Welbes, Executive Director, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, DC Matt Sibul, PE, Chief Planning Officer, Utah Transit Administration, Salt Lake City, Utah Todd Hemingson, AICP, Vice President of Strategic Planning & Development, Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Austin, Texas
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (14)
Similar to RV 2014: Transit + MPO = Partners for Livable Communities by Todd Hemingson, AICP
Similar to RV 2014: Transit + MPO = Partners for Livable Communities by Todd Hemingson, AICP (20)
More from Rail~Volution
More from Rail~Volution (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
RV 2014: Transit + MPO = Partners for Livable Communities by Todd Hemingson, AICP
- 1. Performance Measurement + MPO & Transit Coordination = Livability { Funny Math or Promising Direction? Todd Hemingson, AICP Capital Metro, VP Strategic Planning & Development Austin, Texas
- 2. A Fundamental Premise “A long-range transportation plan has extraordinary value if it includes objectives and outcomes that are managed and measured.” Source: Performance Based Planning and Programming Newsletter, August 2013
- 4. Differing Goals and Values
- 6. Differing Opinions on Role of Transit The Good News • Project Connect- First ever regional high-capacity transit system plan • North and Central Corridor Studies • MPO Plan premised on Activity Centers • Growing transportation ‘sharing economy’ • Positive momentum! The Not So Good News • Road warriors • Anti tax/govt. sentiment • Limited acceptance of transit/land-use connection • Complex multijurisdictional governance situation • November light rail referendum facing challenges • Interest in stripping livability elements from MPO Plan
- 7. Making the Connection Capital Metro CAMPO Performance Measures Capital Metro represented on Policy Board Capital Metro serves on Executive Committee Capital Metro represented on Technical Advisory Committee (Chair)
- 8. Positive Signs for Performance Based Planning 2040 Plan ?
- 9. A Quick Case Study Livability Focus Effective Public Engagement Connecting Transportation and Land use Responsive to Local Needs Solid Technical Process
- 10. Performance-Based Planning: The Optimistic Outcome Environment
- 11. Key Presentation Take-Aways • Transit representation is great • But meaningful engagement is key • Transit and MPOs should embrace performance measures in support of more livable communities • And must work together to see them used properly • Performance based planning is gaining credence • And now has to deliver
- 12. Thank You Todd Hemingson, AICP VP Strategic Planning & Development Capital Metro Austin, Texas todd.hemingson@capmetro.org
Editor's Notes
- Cite paradox of CTRMA…need toll revenue to provide funds for additional projects, tolls come from SOVs not transit!
- Cite paradox of CTRMA…need toll revenue to provide funds for additional projects, tolls come from SOVs not transit!
- Point 4 • Point