3. Action Research
• Action research is a reflective process of
progressive problem solving led by individuals
working with others in teams or as part of a
"community”.
4. Contd…
• School and classroom-based studies initiated
and conducted by teachers and other school
staff.
• Action research involves teachers, aides,
principals, and other school staff as researchers
who systematically reflect on their teaching or
other work and collect data that will answer their
questions.
5. Contd…
• Research undertaken by teams that is flexible
and iterative; the aim is to problem-solve in
order to improve the way processes are
performed and services are delivered.
6. Contd…
• Research conducted by classroom teachers,
often concurrent with their teaching.
• Research, usually informal, designed for direct
application to behavior or to a situation, as
research by teachers in their classrooms.
7. Contd…
• Describes a method of learning by doing.
Community artists experiment with different
approaches to gathering relevant material for a
project.
• Action research is a particular approach to
research that aims to improve practice or have a
real world application.
• In other words, it is research that aims to make a
real change or impact in society, and is not
simply research in and of itself.
8. Contd…
• It aims to address both the practical concerns of
people (in a community, organisation etc) and
the goals of research through people working
together on projects.
• An informal, qualitative, interpretive, reflective
and experimental methodology that requires all
the participants to be collaborative researchers
9. Why should I Use Action Research?
• Because you want to change your practice. You
may be concerned that things might not be
going as you wish, or you may need to
implement a new initiative but are unsure how to
do it effectively.
10. Contd…
• What you want is a way of sorting out these
concerns that offers practical solutions, but that
derives from the specific circumstances of your
practice.
• You know that someone else’s solution may
have merit, but that it is never quite right for the
individual situation within which you work. You
know that practice is always influenced by
context
11. How does this qualify as research?
• Because the act of finding your solution makes
you understand your practice better – not only
what you are doing, but also the factors that
affect what you do. Action research therefore
has two aspects.
12. Contd…
• The starting point is to sort out a problem or
issue in practice; to this extent an action
researcher seeks a solution.
• But the process can also be used as a deliberate
attempt to understand practice better – a
traditional research attitude. What is most
important in both approaches is that you are
open, honest and rigorous.
13. What Do We Mean by Practice?
• From the perspective of action research, the
best way to think about practice is the way you
carry out your professional actions.
• This is, of course, what you do, but it is also why
you think you should be doing things the way
you do.
• You will hear of the ‘theory-practice divide’;
action research as an approach cuts across this
divide, encouraging a practitioner to consider
both aspects as part of a single whole.
14. What is action research about?
• Action research is a practical approach to
professional inquiry in any social situation.
• The examples in this component relate to
education and are therefore of particular
relevance to teachers or lecturers engaged in
their daily contact with children or students.
15. Contd…
• But professional practice need not be teaching: it
may be management or administration in a
school or college, or it may be in an unrelated
area, such as medicine or the social services.
• The context for professional inquiry might
change, but the principles and processes
involved in action research are the same,
regardless of the nature of the practice.
16. How does action research work?
• At its heart, action research involves the careful
monitoring of planned change in practice.
• A decision is taken that a particular action may
either yield improvements or provide information
as to the nature of the teaching situation.
• The action is thus used as a research tool. Both
elements of action and research are of equal
prominence in the approach.
17. Contd…
It can be thought of as: Research on action by
using Action as a tool for research with the
process being driven by a dialogue between the
elements of:
• action and the intentions behind action
or
• practice and the values behind practice.
18.
19. Individual or Collaborative?
• So far, this account has focused on the
individual nature of action research, reflecting
Whitehead’s perspective on the process.
20. Contd…
• This is not to say that groups of people within a
school or college cannot undertake a
collaborative action research project, exploring
how best to change institutional practice, but it is
important to realise the individual nature of
practice itself.
• If reflection on practice involves engaging with
intentions, values and beliefs, then strong
elements of these will be intensely personal.
21. Methods
• The prime criterion for choosing a particular data
gathering method in action research is whether it
is anticipated that the method will give useful
information about the practice under study.
• It is sometimes thought that methods used in
action research are purely qualitative.
22. Contd…
• This does not have to be true. Although the
overall analysis of the data generated by any
methods used will be qualitative in nature,
numerical or statistical information may be of
great value to that analysis.
• For example, a statistical breakdown of
examination or SATs passes may be a useful
piece of data when exploring the effect of
aspects of practice.
23. Contd…
• What is most important is that the researcher
understands that different research methods
illuminate only particular aspects of a situation.
None give a whole picture.
24. Contd…
• In seeking evidence of her practice, or the
effectiveness of a change in practice, a teacher
needs to look at it from different perspectives;
she needs to employ a triangulation of methods.
• This is a simple principle, involving the careful
choice of a range of data gathering techniques,
each of which might illuminate a different aspect
of the same issue:
27. Area/s to be discussed.
• Objectives of research.
• Qualitative and Quantitative
28. Objectives: (Descriptive, Co-relational,
Exploratory and Explanatory)
• Descriptive research is also called statistical
research. The main goal of this type of research is
to describe the data and characteristics about what
is being studied.
29. Contd…
• The idea behind this type of research is to study
frequencies, averages, and other statistical
calculations. Although this research is highly
accurate, it does not gather the causes behind a
situation.
30. Contd…
• Correlation research measures the relationship
between two or more variables or gives an
indication of how one variable may predict
another.
31. Contd…
• Exploratory research is a type of research
conducted because a problem has not been
clearly defined. Exploratory research helps
determine the best research design, data
collection methods, and selection of subjects.
• Given that it is fundamental in nature,
exploratory research often concludes that a
perceived problem does not actually exist.
32. Contd…
• Explanatory research explores "why," and
attempts to explain as the purposes of
explanatory research.
• It builds on exploratory and descriptive research
and further identifies the reasons for something
that occurs. It looks for causes and reasons.
34. Contd…
• Qualitative research is research undertaken to
gain insights concerning attitudes, beliefs,
motivations and behaviours of individuals, to
explore a social or human problem.
35. Contd…
• Qualitative research methods include focus
groups, in-depth interviews, observation
research, and case studies.
• You can use qualitative research to study past
events or current events.
• When you use it for past events, it is specifically
called historical research.
36. The Salient Features of Qualitative
Research are:
• Conducted to have an insight and better
understanding of not only about the current
situation is but also why it is so.
• More open and responsive to the research
participants.
• Uses a variety of methods and data collection
strategies,
• Offers opportunities for descriptive and
exploratory studies.
37. Quantitative Research
• Quantitative research is research concerned
with the measurement of attitudes, behaviours
and perceptions.
• It includes interviewing methods such as
telephone, intercept, and door-to-door
interviews, as well as self-completion methods
such as mail outs and online surveys.
38. Quantitative Research
• Means the data is analyzed in terms of numbers.
• Involves the collection of numerical data.
• Predicts and explains data in the form of
statistical analysis.
• Uses the numerical method to analysis and
interpret the results.
• Finds out the relationship among quantifiable
variables and the results are inferred.
40. Area/s to be discussed.
• Comparative analysis of research.
• Qualitative research methods.
41. To understand characteristic of research design using
research purpose here is a comparative analysis:
Exploratory
Research
Descriptive
Research
Explanatory
Research
Research
approach used
Unstructured Structured
Highly
structured
Research
conducted
through
Asking
research
questions
Asking
research
questions
By using
research
hypotheses.
When is it
conducted?
Early stages of
decision
making
Later stages of
decision
making
Later stages of
decision
making
42. What is the purpose of Research?
• Research method is defined as the tools or an
instrument that is used to accomplish the goals
and attributes of conducting a research process.
43. Contd…
• Think of the methodology as a systematic
process in which the tools or instruments will be
employed. There is no use of a tool if it is not
being used efficiently.
44. Contd…
• To understand research methods we must first
understand what research is.
• Research is a careful study of a specific problem
or concern using scientific methods, tools, and
instruments.
45. Contd…
• Remember as kids, we were given projects in
elementary schools and we were asked to know
about it in details.
• Research is the adult form of that elementary
project, only a more precise and thorough
version!
46. Contd…
• Research can be about anything, scientific
research, basic research, applied
research, market research- qualitative market
research and quantitative market research,
problem-oriented research, problem-solving
research.
• To begin researching something, you need to
have a problem or a concern that needs a
solution.
47. Contd…
• Research really begins with asking the right
research questions, what follows next is
choosing appropriate research method to be
able to investigate the problem or issue in the
right direction and then finally analyze your
findings or observations to draw appropriate
conclusions.
48. Contd…
• When it comes to customers and related
research, there should be no stone unturned.
• Specify and plan the customer’s research, help
make smart decisions about how to market and
position your business efficiently.
49. Contd…
• Choosing the right research method will help
you get important answers about your clients.
• But before we go any further, first let us identify
the research methods.
50. Types of Research Methods and
Research Example
• Research methods are broadly classified
as Qualitative Research and Quantitative
Research. Both research methods have
distinctive properties and data collection
methods.
51. Qualitative Research Methods
• Qualitative research is a research method that
collects data using conversational methods,
where participants involved in the research are
asked open-ended questions.
• The responses collected are essentially non-
numerical.
• This method not only helps a researcher
understand “what” participant think but also,
“why” they think in a particular way.
52. Widely Used Qualitative Research
Methods
One-to-one Interview:
• This interview technique is systematically
planned and as the name suggests is conducted
with one participant at a given point in time.
• One-to-one interviews need a researcher to
prepare questions in advance and to make sure
the researcher asks only the most important
questions to the participant.
53. Contd…
• This type of interview lasts anywhere between
20 minutes to half an hour.
• During this time the researcher collects as many
meaningful data as possible from the
participants to draw inferences.
54. Contd…
Focus Groups:
• Focus groups are small groups comprising of
around 6-10 participants who are usually experts
in the subject matter. A moderator is assigned to
a focus group who facilitates the discussion
amongst the group members
55. Contd…
• A moderator’s experience in conducting focus
group plays an important role.
• An experienced moderator can probe the
participants by asking the correct research
questions that will help him/her collect a sizable
amount of information related to the research.
57. Contd…
• This method can prove to be a bit demanding in
terms of a researcher getting adapted to the
natural environment of the target audience
which could even be the Amazon rainforest!
Geographic locations can be a constraint in this
type of research method.
• Instead of conducting interviews a researcher
needs to experience the settings in person to
collect information.
58. Contd…
Text Analysis:
• Text analysis is a little different from other
qualitative research methods as it used to
analyze the social life by decoding words, texts
etc. through any available form of
documentation.
59. Contd…
• The researcher studies and understands the
context in which the documents are furnished
with the information and then tries to draw
meaningful inferences from it.
• In modern times, researchers follow activities on
a social media platform and try and understand
the pattern of thoughts.
60. Contd…
Case Study Research:
• Case study research, as the name suggests is
used to study an organization or an entity. This
research method has evolved over the years
and is one of the most valuable qualitative
research methods known to researchers.
61. Contd…
• This type of research is used in fields like
education sector, philosophical and
psychological studies.
• This method involves a deep diving into the
ongoing research and collects data.
63. Area/s to be discussed.
• Comparative analysis of research:
Quantitative Research Methods
64. To understand characteristic of research design using
research purpose here is a comparative analysis:
Exploratory
Research
Descriptive
Research
Explanatory
Research
Research
approach used
Unstructured Structured
Highly
structured
Research
conducted
through
Asking
research
questions
Asking
research
questions
By using
research
hypotheses.
When is it
conducted?
Early stages of
decision
making
Later stages of
decision
making
Later stages of
decision
making
65. Quantitative Research Methods
• Quantitative research methods are the
methods that deal with numbers and anything
that can be dealt with a measurable form, in a
systematic way of investigating the
phenomenon.
66. Contd…
• It is used to answer questions in terms of
justifying relationships with measurable
variables to either explain, predict or control a
phenomenon.
67. There are three methods that are often used by
researchers to conduct this type of research,
they are:
Survey Research-
• The ultimate goal of survey research is to learn
about a large population by deploying
the survey. Gone are the days where a survey
was carried out using a pen and a paper.
• Today, online surveys are a popular mode of
research as they are convenient and can be
sent in an email or made available on the
internet.
68. Contd…
• In this method, a researcher designs a survey
with most relevant survey questions and
deploys the survey.
• Once the researcher receives the responses
he/she summarizes them to tabulate meaningful
findings and data.
69. Contd…
• Descriptive Research- Descriptive research is a
quantitative research method, which
corresponds to identifying the characteristics of
an observed phenomenon and collecting more
information.
70. Contd…
• This research method is designed to depict the
participants in a very systematic and accurate
manner.
• In simple words, descriptive research is all about
describing the phenomenon, observing and
drawing conclusions from it.
71. Contd
Correlational Research:
• Correlational research examines the
relationship between two or more variables. Let
us take an example to understand correlational
research.
• Let us take an example to understand
correlational research, Consider hypothetically,
a researcher is studying a correlation between
cancer and marries women. Let us say married
women have a negative correlation with cancer.
72. Contd…
• In the previous example, there are two variables:
cancer, and married women. When we say
negative correlation it means women who are
married are less likely to develop cancer.
However, it doesn’t mean that marriage directly
avoids cancer.
73. Identifying Research Methodology
• To choose the appropriate research methods, it
is necessary to clearly identify the research
objectives. Here is an example of some of the
research objectives you can take into
consideration for your business:
• To start with, find out the needs of your clients.
74. Contd…
• Know their preferences and understand what is
important to them
• Find an appropriate way to make your
customers aware of your products and services.
• Find ways to improve your products or services
to suit the needs of your customers.
75. After identifying what you need to know, you
should then ask what research methods will offer
you that information.
• Organize your questions within the framework of
the 7 Ps that influences your organization –
product, price (if applied), promotion, place,
people, processes and physical tests.
76. Contd…
• A well-organized customer research process
produces valid, accurate, reliable, timely and
complete results.
• Research results that rigorously reflect the
opinions and needs of your clients will help you
grow your sales and improve your operations.
• To obtain the results you need to establish and
follow the processes that you have detailed out
for your organization:
77. Set Your Goals
• Consider the client’s research objectives and
define those that identify with yours and plan a
strategy once you obtain the information.
• Make sure that your goals objectives smart do
not presume their result, and define them
intelligently and make sure you set achievable
targets, smart goals, and objectives.
78. Plan Your Research
:
• Good planning allows the use of creative and
logical approaches to select the research
methods that gather the information.
• Your plan will be influenced by the type and
complexity of the information you need, the skills
of your market research team, and how soon
you need the information and your budget.
• Make an adequate strategic planning for
your market research.
79. Contd…
• Identify your list of questions and decide on the
research methods that will best achieve your
goals. Detail your research approach and some
initial idea of how you will classify and analyze
the data.
80. Collect and collate your
results
• Make a list of how you are going to carry out the
research process, the data you need to collect
and collection methods. This will help you keep
track of your research processes and make
sense of your findings. It will also allow you to
verify that your research accurately reflects the
opinions of your clients.
81. Contd….
• Remember, research is only valuable and useful
when it is valid, accurate and reliable. Relying
on imperfect research is dangerous; incorrect
results can lead to customer churn and a
decrease in sales.
82. Analyze and Understand Your
Research
• The analysis of the data can vary from simple
and direct steps to technical and complex
processes.
• Adopt an approach, and choose the method
of data analysis based on the research
methods you have carried out.
83. Keep the Findings Ready
• Choose a spreadsheet that allows you to easily
enter your data.
• If you do not have a large amount of data, you
should be able to manage them with the use of
basic tools available in the software.
• If you have collected more complete and
complex data, you may have to consider using
specific programs or tools that will help you
manage your data.
84. Review and Interpret the Information
to Draw Conclusions
• Once you have gathered all the data, you can
scan your information and interpret it to draw
conclusions and make informed decisions. You
should review the data and then:
• Identify the main trends and issues,
opportunities and problems you observe, and
write a sentence about each one
• Keep track of the frequency with which each of
the main findings appears.
85. Contd…
• Make a list of your findings from the most
common to the least common
• Evaluate and perform separately a list of the
strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and
threats that have been identified in a SWOT
analysis.
• Preparation of conclusions and
recommendations about your research.
87. Area/s to be discussed.
• Comparative analysis: Difference between
Qualitative and Quantitative Research.
88. To understand characteristic of research design using
research purpose here is a comparative analysis:
Exploratory
Research
Descriptive
Research
Explanatory
Research
Research
approach used
Unstructured Structured
Highly
structured
Research
conducted
through
Asking
research
questions
Asking
research
questions
By using
research
hypotheses.
When is it
conducted?
Early stages of
decision
making
Later stages of
decision
making
Later stages of
decision
making
89. Difference between Qualitative and
Quantitative Research
• Research is the most widely used tool to
increase and brush-up the stock of knowledge
about something and someone.
• In the field of marketing, business, sociology,
psychology, science & technology, economics,
etc. there are two standard ways of conducting
research, i.e. qualitative research or quantitative
research.
90. Contd…
• While the qualitative research relies on verbal
narrative like spoken or written data,
the quantitative research uses logical or
statistical observations to draw conclusions.
91. Comparison Chart
BASIS FOR COMPARISON QUALITATIVE RESEARCH QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
Meaning Qualitative research is a method of inquiry
that develops understanding on human
and social sciences, to find the way people
think and feel.
Quantitative research is a research method
that is used to generate numerical data
and hard facts, by employing statistical,
logical and mathematical technique.
Nature Holistic Particularistic
Approach Subjective Objective
Research type Exploratory Conclusive
Reasoning Inductive Deductive
Sampling Purposive Random
Data Verbal Measurable
Inquiry Process-oriented Result-oriented
Hypothesis Generated Tested
Elements of analysis Words, pictures and objects Numerical data
Objective To explore and discover ideas used in the
ongoing processes.
To examine cause and effect relationship
between variables.
Methods Non-structured techniques like In-depth
interviews, group discussions etc.
Structured techniques such as surveys,
questionnaires and observations.
Result Develops initial understanding Recommends final course of action
92. Key Differences between Qualitative And
Quantitative Research
• The differences between qualitative and
quantitative research are provided can be drawn
clearly on the next grounds:
93. Contd…
• Qualitative research is a method of inquiry that
develops understanding on human and social
sciences, to find the way people think and feel.
• A scientific and empirical research method that
is used to generate numerical data, by
employing statistical, logical and mathematical
technique is called quantitative research.
• Qualitative research is holistic in nature while
quantitative research is particularistic.
94. Contd
• The qualitative research follows a subjective
approach as the researcher is intimately
involved, whereas the approach of quantitative
research is objective, as the researcher is
uninvolved and attempts to precise the
observations and analysis on the topic to answer
the inquiry.
• Qualitative research is exploratory. As opposed
to quantitative research which is conclusive.
95. Contd…
• The reasoning used to synthesise data in
qualitative research is inductive whereas in the
case of quantitative research the reasoning is
deductive.
96. Contd…
• Qualitative research is based on purposive
sampling, where a small sample size is selected
with a view to get a thorough understanding of
the target concept.
• On the other hand, quantitative research relies
on random sampling; wherein a large
representative sample is chosen in order to
extrapolate the results to the whole population.
97. Contd…
• Verbal data are collected in qualitative research.
Conversely, in quantitative research measurable
data is gathered.
• Inquiry in qualitative research is a process-
oriented, which is not in the case of quantitative
research.
98. Contd…
• Elements used in the analysis of qualitative
research are words, pictures, and objects while
that of quantitative research is numerical data.
• Qualitative Research is conducted with the aim
of exploring and discovering ideas used in the
ongoing processes.
• As opposed to quantitative research the purpose
is to examine cause and effect relationship
between variables.
99. Contd…
• Lastly, the methods used in qualitative research
are in-depth interviews, focus groups, etc. In
contrast, the methods of conducting quantitative
research are structured interviews and
observations.
• Qualitative Research develops the initial
understanding whereas quantitative research
recommends a final course of action.
101. Area/s to be discussed.
• Identifying the Research Problem.
102. Identifying the Research Problem
• The research problem is the heart of a study.
• It is a clear, definite statement of the area of
concern or investigation and is backed by
evidence (Bryman, 2007).
103. Contd…
• It drives the research questions and processes
and provides the framework for understanding
the research findings.
• To begin, you will need to know where to look for
your research problem and how to evaluate
when a research problem for success.
104. Where to Find a Research Problem?
• Ideas for research problems tend to come from
two sources: real life and the scholarly arena.
• First, identifying a research problem can be as
simple as observing the complications and
issues in your local workplace.
105. Contd…
• You may encounter ongoing issues on a daily
basis in your workplace or observe your
colleagues struggle with major issues or
questions in your field.
• These ongoing obstacles and issues in the
workplace can be the catalyst for developing a
research problem.
106. Contd…
• Alternatively, research problems can be
identified by reviewing recent literature, reports,
or databases in your field.
• Often the section of “recommendations for the
future studies” provided at the end of journal
articles or doctoral dissertations suggest
potential research problems.
107. Contd…
• In addition, major reports and databases in the
field may reveal findings or data-based facts that
call for additional investigation or suggest
potential issues to be addressed.
• Looking at what theories need to be tested is
another opportunity to develop a research
problem.
108. How to Evaluate a Research Problem?
• Once you find your potential research problem,
you will need to evaluate the problem and
ensure that it is appropriate for research.
• A research problem is deemed appropriate
when it is supported by the literature, and
considered significant, timely, novel, specific,
and researchable.
• Stronger research problems are more likely to
succeed in publication, presentation, and
application.
109. Supported by the Literature
• Your research problem should be relevant to the
field and supported by a number of recent peer-
reviewed studies in the field.
• Even if you identify the problem based on the
recommendation of one journal article or
dissertation, you will still need to conduct a
literature search and ensure that other
researchers support the problem and need for
conducting research to further address the
problem.
110. Significant
• Your research problem should have a positive
impact on the field.
• The impact can be practical, in the form of direct
application of the results in the field, or
conceptual, where the work advances the field
by filling a knowledge gap.
111. Novel
• Your research problem should be original and
unique.
• It should seek to address a gap in our
knowledge or application.
• An exhaustive review of literature can help you
identify whether the problem has already been
addressed with your particular sample and/or
context.
112. Contd…
• Talking to experts in the research area can
illuminate a problem.
• Replication of an existing study warrants
discussion of value elsewhere, but novelty can
be found in determining if an already-resolved
problem holds in a new sample and/or context.
113. Specific and Clear
• Your research problem should be specific
enough to set the direction of the study, raise
research question(s), and determine an
appropriate research method and design.
• Vague research problems may not be useful to
specify the direction of the study or develop
research questions.
114. Researchable
• Research problems are solved through the
scientific method.
• This means research-ability, or feasibility of the
problem, is more important than all of the above
characteristics.
• You as the researcher should be able to solve
the problem with your abilities and available
research methods, designs, research sites,
resources, and timeframe.
115. Contd…
• If a research problem retains all of
aforementioned characteristics but it is not
researchable, it may not be an appropriate
research problem.
118. Literature Review as Sources of
Information and its Procedure
• Any research, no matter at what scale, requires
reading about what other people have done in
the area of your interest, how they have done it,
and what are the gaps in the research in that
area.
• Any new production of knowledge is necessarily
based on previous and existing knowledge.
119. Contd…
• You need information to support or refute your
arguments and write about your findings.
• You need to provide evidence that you are
aware of the current trends and issues in your
area of interest and are cognizant of the current
state of knowledge on the subject.
• Ideally this reading should form the basis for
choosing your research methodology.
120. Contd…
• Moreover, every new article/book you read will
have a cumulative effect on the existing body of
knowledge in your mind, pushing you to
reinterpret or rethink some of your previous
assumptions or ideas.
• But there is a limit to the changes you can make
in your literature review.
121. Contd…
• The best way is to prepare a first draft and then
polish it at the stage of data interpretation when
you will be reading your literature review again
to present your analysis in a coherent manner
with cross-references related to your literature
review.
122. Contd…
• Alternatively, research problems can be
identified by reviewing recent literature, reports,
or databases in your field.
• Often the section of “recommendations for the
future studies” provided at the end of journal
articles or doctoral dissertations suggest
potential research problems.
123. Contd…
• In addition, major reports and databases in the
field may reveal findings or data-based facts that
call for additional investigation or suggest
potential issues to be addressed.
• Looking at what theories need to be tested is
another opportunity to develop a research
problem.
124. Why Review Literature?
• Some reasons for including a literature review in
your research paper/thesis are:
1.
The basic reason for literature review is to
contextualize your research. Every academic
research project is related to a particular area
and is a link in a chain of similar research
taking place in the area.
This contextualization shows your awareness
of the work going on in your field and also
identifies the niche you wish to occupy.
125. Contd…
2.
It gives you ideas about how to classify and
present your data. When you read critically, you
can sees how writers explore the relationships
between facts and how facts and relationships
are explained.
Methods used by other writers may not be
suitable for your purposes, but they may give
you ideas about how you might categorize your
data.
126. Contd…
3.
Literature review helps you to distinguish what
has been done from what needs to be done and
how it should be done.
Readings in an area reveal gaps in the literature
and this fine tunes your research question and
subsequent research methods.
127. Contd…
4.
Literature review assists you to synthesize your
ideas and gain perspectives to look at your
research problem with different lens. Other
researchers may have looked at a similar issue
but from different angles.
This knowledge can fortify you to find your own
angle.
128. Sources of Literature Review
• One important question that new researchers
always ask is “Where do we find the material for
doing a literature review?”
• The next are the primary and secondary
sources for finding the material that you need to
read:
129. Contd…
• Articles in Journals
• Books
• Internet
• Research Reports
• Government Documents
• Abstracts
• Reviews
• Unpublished Theses
• Electronic Research Information Center/Social
Sciences Citation
• Index/Dissertation Abstracts Index
130. Managing the Literature
• The bibliography at the end of a recent article or
book can provide you with an adequate reading
list of most of the relevant material related to that
topic.
• Once the relevant literature has been located
and found through the sources suggested, the
next step is to manage it.
131. Contd…
• This requires efficient and selective reading.
Once you try locating the relevant literature, you
will discover that it is available in vast quantities.
• Now the primary task is to pick out the material
that is actually related and relevant to your
research area.
132. Contd…
• This requires you to be a proficient reader who
can get the gist of things quickly as you will have
to go through a lot of reading.
• In an article published in a journal, the first thing
to do is look at the abstract or summary of the
article.
133. Contd…
• This will give you an idea whether it is relevant
for you. In the case of a book you should look at
the list of contents, the blurb, the summaries
usually given at the end of the chapters and the
introduction.
• This will tell you quickly if any part is pertinent for
you.
134. Contd…
• The next step is to follow a clear system of
keeping track of your reading references.
• You need to create a management system that
will incorporate your sources with all relevant
details including a note about where you found
that article or book.
138. Theory
• Theory is a model or framework for observation
and understanding, which shapes both what we
see and how we see it.
• Theory allows the researcher to make links
between the abstract and the concrete; the
theoretical and the empirical; thought statements
and observational statements etc.
139. Contd…
• Theory is a generalised statement that asserts a
connection between two or more types of
phenomena – any generalised explanatory
principle.
• Theory is a system of interconnected
abstractions or ideas that condenses and
organises knowledge about the world.
• Theory explains and predicts the relationship
between variables.
140. Contd…
• Theory guides research and organises its ideas. The
analogy of bricks lying around haphazardly in the
brickyard: ‘facts’ of different shapes and sizes have
no meaning unless they are drawn together in a
theoretical or conceptual framework.
• Theory becomes stronger as more supporting
evidence is gathered; and it provides a context for
predictions.
• Theory has the capacity to generate new research.
• Theory is empirically relevant and always tentative
141. Theories vs. hypotheses
• Hypotheses usually predicts the relationship
between two or more variables. Hypotheses are
more specific than theories. Multiple hypotheses
may relate to one theory. The theories that you
use in your research operates at different levels:
• Micro-level theory seeks to explain behaviour at
the level of the individual or family environment
(e.g. psychology, frustration, aggression
hypothesis etc).
142. Contd…
• Meso-level theory seeks to explain the
interactions of micro-level organisations (e.g.
social institutions, communities etc).
• Macro-level theory seeks to explain behaviour at
the level of large groups of people (e.g. ethnicity,
class, gender etc).
143. How to evaluate the quality of a
theory or explanation
• Is the theory logical and coherent?
• Does it fit the available data?
• Does it provide testable claims?
• Have the theory-based predictions been tested?
• Does the theory work better than rival theories or
explanations?
• Is it general enough to apply to more than one
place, situation, or person?
144. Contd…
• Can practitioners use it to control or influence
things in the world e.g:
• a good theory of teaching helps teachers to
positively influence students learning.
• a good theory of counselling helps counselors to
positively influence their clients’ mental health
145. Theory and research are interrelated
in the following ways:
• Theory frames what we look at, how we think and look at
it.
• It provides basic concepts and directs us to the important
questions.
• It suggests ways for us to make sense of research data.
• Theory enables us to connect a single study to the
immense base of knowledge to which other researchers
contribute.
• It helps a researcher see the forest instead of just a
single tree.
• Theory increases a researcher’s awareness of
interconnections and of the broader significance of data.
146. Contd…
• Theories are, by their nature, abstract and provide a
selective and one-sided account of the many-sided
concrete social world.
• Theory allows the researcher to make links between the
abstract and the concrete, the theoretical and the
empirical, thought statements and observational
statements etc.
147. Contd…
• There is a two-way relationship between theory and
research. Social theory informs our understanding of
issues, which, in turn, assists us in making research
decisions and making sense of the world.
• Theory is not fixed; it is provisional, open to revision and
grows into more accurate and comprehensive
explanations about the make-up and operation of the
social world.
148. Deductive theory
• In a deductive approach, researchers use theory
to guide the design of a study and the
interpretation of results.
• As researchers continue to conduct empirical
research in testing a theory, they develop
confidence that some parts of it are true.
149. Contd…
• Researchers may modify some propositions of a
theory or reject them if several well-conducted
studies have negative findings.
• A theory’s core propositions and central tenets
are more difficult to test and are refuted less
often.
• In a slow process, researchers may decide to
abandon or change a theory as the evidence
against it mounts over time and cannot be
logically reconciled.
150. Inductive theory
• Inductive theorising begins with a few
assumptions and broad orienting concepts.
Theory develops from the ground up as the
researchers gather and analyse the data.
151. Contd…
• Theory emerges slowly, concept by concept, and
proposition by proposition, in a specific area.
• Over time, the concepts and empirical
generalisations emerge and mature. Soon,
relationships become visible and researchers weave
knowledge from different studies into more abstract
theory.
• Empirical generalizations posit the most basic
relationship between concepts: e.g. ‘most people I
know who drive small Japanese cars are under 30
years of age’.
152. The Role of Theory
• 6 Main Roles of Theory for Research:
1.
Theory provides significant guidelines and trails
for the conduct of research by pointing to areas
that are most likely to be fruitful, that is, areas in
which meaningful relationships among variables
are likely to be found.
If the variables come to be selected such that no
relationships between them obtain, the research
will be sterile no matter how meticulous the
subsequent observations and inferences.
153. Contd…
• A theoretic system narrows down the range of
facts to be studied.
• Theory provides the researcher with a definite
view point a direction which goes a long way
toward helping him enquire into relationships
between certain variables selected from among
an almost infinite array of variables.
154. Contd…
• As Oppenheimer puts it, “in order for us to
understand anything we have to fail to perceive
a great deal that is there.
• Knowledge is purchased at the expense of what
might have been seen and learned and was
not…it is a condition of knowledge that
somehow or the other we pick the clues which
give us insight into what we have to find out
about the world.”
155. Contd…
• As a storehouse of meaningful hypotheses a
fruitful theory suggests potential problems for
study and thus ignites new investigative studies.
156. Contd…
• In fact, a theory can be judged productive (to the
extent it can spark off a number of questions. A
productive theory suggests potential problems,
fruitful hypotheses and provides new
perspectives.
• Einstein and Infield observe, “It is never
possible to introduce only observable
quantities in a theory. It is the theory which
decides what can be observed.” Only thus can
the task of science be reduced to manageability.
157. Contd…
• Besides suggesting fruitful approaches to
phenomena in the general area with which it is
concerned, theory also provides leads for
research in a different way, viz., by suggesting
other kinds of phenomena that may perhaps be
understood or explained in the same general
terms.
158. Contd..
• Take the example of Cohen’s theory of
‘delinquent subculture’ (Sub-
cultural theory emerged from the work of the
Chicago School and investigations of social
strain theory into urban gangs, and developed
into a series of theories proposing that small
cultural groups fragment away from mainstream
values and have attitudes conducive to violence
and criminal behaviour).
159. Contd…
• The Central idea of Cohen’s theory is that the
delinquent sub-culture evolved by the working
class juveniles is a response of these juveniles
to deal with the problem of individual adjustment
attendant upon the difficulty in meeting the
criteria of status as prescribed by the middle-
class standards which have to be reckoned with.
160. Contd…
• The delinquent sub-culture provides alternative
criteria of status which these children can meet
and thus, helps them deal with the problem of
individual adjustment.
• Cohen’s theoretical formulation constitutes a
generic approach to the understanding of how
and why any sub-culture arises.
• Thus, such different sub-cultures as those
emerging among different professional groups or
social classes or small communities may be
understood in the same terms.
161. Contd…
• Research on such groups would concentrate on
discovering the common problems of adjustment
faced by the members and the ways in which the
particular patterns of these sub-cultures help
members to deal with them.
• In as much as a theory summarizes known facts
and predicts facts which have not yet been
observed, it also points to areas which have not
yet been explored, in other words, what gaps
typically obtain in our knowledge.
162. Contd…
• Needless to say, such gaps would not be visible
if our facts were not systematized and
organized. It is thus that theory suggests where
our knowledge is deficient.
• A researcher’s acquaintance with the existing
theories helps him to select research problems
that are likely to prove productive and
worthwhile and to avoid enquiries into problems
that may prove sterile, yielding no insights.
163. Contd…
• Formulation of worthwhile questions is an
important step and a precondition to the
extension of knowledge.
• Alerting oneself to the gaps in theory and fact
increases the likelihood of formulating significant
questions for research.
164. 2
• Another contribution of theory for research is in
terms of increasing the meaningfulness of the
findings of a particular study by helping us to
perceive them as special cases of the operation
of a set of more general or abstract statements
of relationships rather than as isolated bits of
empirical information.
165. Contd…
• A theory typically enhances the meaningfulness
of research, since seemingly unrelated findings
of isolated studies assume new meaning and
significance when they are put into proper
theoretical perspective.
• Let us take the example of observation by
Durkheim that Catholics have a lower suicide
rate as compared to the Protestants.
166. Contd…
• As an isolated empirical uniformity, the finding
would not add greatly to our understanding of
suicidal behaviour unless it conceptualized, that
is, conceived of as an illustration of a linkage
amongst abstractions of a higher order (e.g.,
Catholicism-Social Cohesion unrelieved
anxieties-suicide rate).
167. Contd…
• This done, we are easily able to understand that
what was initially taken as an isolated empirical
finding of a relationship between religious
affiliation and suicidal behaviour is in fact a
reflection of a much more general relationship
between groups with certain conceptualized
attributes (social cohesion) and behaviour of
their members.
168. Contd…
• This way, the scope of the original empirical
finding gets considerably extended and several
seemingly disparate findings can be seen to be
the contextual manifestations of the general
principle.
169. Contd…
• Similarly, to take another example, the
seemingly isolated finding that wives complain of
heavy expenditure when the husband’s relatives
are in the house-guests may be understood on a
higher plane of abstraction, to be an instance of
the factor of emotional proximity or distance
influencing perception.
170. Contd…
• The scope of the findings thus enlarged, other
apparently disparate findings may be seen to be
interrelated by means of a theoretic thread (e.g.,
the distorting effect of lack of confidence or
morale on perception may be derived from the
same theoretical orientation).
• As a mental shorthand, theory summarizes
relationships amongst variables in a conceptual
framework.
171. Contd…
• It is through establishing the theoretical
pertinence of an empirical finding or uniformity,
that we can provide for the cummulation both of
theory and research findings.
• To illustrate, the empirical uniformities about
differentials in the suicide rate lend added
confirmation to the set of propositions (theory)
from which they and other uniformities have
been derived. This may be underlined as a
major function of theory.
173. Area/s to be discussed.
• The Role of Theory: continues
174. The Role of Theory
6 Main Roles of Theory for Research:
No. 3.
The linkage of the specific empirical findings to a
more general concept has another major
advantage. It affords a more secure ground for
prediction than do these empirical findings by
themselves.
The theory by providing a rationale behind the
empirical findings introduces a ground for
prediction which is more secure” than mere
extrapolation from previously observed trends.
175. Contd…
• Thus, if studies indicated a decrease in social
cohesion among a community of tribals, the
theory-oriented researcher would feel secure to
predict increased rates of suicide in this group.
• On the contrary, the a theoretic empiricist would
have no alternative but to predict on the basis of
extrapolation.
176. Contd…
• The prediction may be concerned with
estimating whether a relationship between two
variables, X and Y, which has been observed in
the past, will continue in future, or it may be
concerned with estimating whether changes in
certain conditions will lead to changes in
observed relationship (among the variables).
177. Contd…
• To revert to our earlier illustration of
delinquency, while Cohen points out that there
need not be a direct link between understanding
the ’cause’ of a phenomenon and finding a
‘cure,’ his theory nevertheless seems to suggest
that a measure intended to reduce gang
delinquency is likely to be successful to the
extent that it either changes the standards by
which working class students are judged in
school and (in the community, generally) or
helps them to meet and prove equal to those
standards.
178. No. 4
• Whereas an empirical finding as a proposition
referring to certain concrete contextual
manifestation of a phenomenon does not afford
a basis for drawing diverse inferences about
what will follow, its reformulation or revamping in
theoretic terms affords a secure basis for
arriving at the inferences about the varied
positive consequences in areas quite remote
from the central area to which the given finding
relates.
179. Contd…
• For example, the empirical uniformity that
Catholics have a lower suicide rate relative to
Protestants does not by itself suggest diverse
consequences in fields of conduct apparently far
removed from that of suicidal behaviour. But
once this uniformity is theoretically reformulated,
obsessive behaviour and other maladaptive
actions may be seen to be related to
inadequacies of group-cohesion.
180. Contd…
• Thus, the lower the degree of social cohesion,
higher the rate of mental illness). The
imaginative conversion of empirical uniformities
into theoretic statements thus increases the
fruitfulness of research through successive
exploration of its implications (or any empirical
uniformity).
• Theory thus mediates between specific empirical
generalization or uniformities and broad
theoretical orientations anchored in the
intellectual tradition.
181. No. 5
• In affording broader meanings to empirical
findings the theory also attests to their truth.
• A hypothesis is as much confirmed by fitting it
into a theory as by fitting it into facts, because it
then enjoys the support provided by evidence for
all the other hypotheses of the given theory.
182. No. 6
• Theory helps us to identify gaps in our
knowledge and seek to bridge them up with
intuitive, impressionistic or extensional
generalizations.
• As Karl Jaspers said, “It is only when using
methodologically classified sciences that we
know what we know and what we do not
know.” This way, theory constitutes a crucially
important guide to designing of fruitful research.
185. Sampling Techniques
What is 'Sampling'?
• Sampling is a process used in statistical analysis
in which a predetermined number of
observations are taken from a larger population.
• The methodology used to sample from a larger
population depends on the type of analysis
being performed but may include simple random
sampling or systematic sampling.
186. Contd…
• We can also say that sampling is the act,
process, or technique of selecting a suitable
sample, or a representative part of a population
for the purpose of determining parameters or
characteristics of the whole population.
187. What is Survey Sampling?
• Surveys would be meaningless and incomplete
without accounting for the respondents that
they’re aimed at.
• The best survey design practices keep the target
population at the core of their thought process.
188. Contd…
• ‘All the residents of the slums in Karachi’, ‘every
NGO in Lahore’ and ‘all students below the age
of 16 in Multan’ are examples of a population;
they are countable, finite and well-defined.
189. Contd…
• When the population is small enough,
researchers have the resources to reach out to
all of them. This would be the best case
scenario, making sure that everybody who
matters to the survey is represented accurately.
• A survey that covers the entire target population
is called a census.
190. Contd…
• However, most surveys cannot survey the entire
population.
• This is when sampling techniques become
crucial to your survey.
191. Why is it Important?
Resource Constraints:
• If the target population is not small enough, or if
the resources at your disposal don’t give you the
bandwidth to cover the entire population, it is
important to identify a subset of the population to
work with – a carefully identified group that is
representative of the population.
• This process is called survey sampling, and it is
one of the most important aspects of survey
design.
192. Contd…
• Whatever the sample size, there are fixed costs
associated with any survey.
• Once the survey has begun, the marginal costs
associated with gathering more information,
from more people, are proportional to the size of
the sample.
193. Drawing Inferences About the
Population
• Researchers are not interested in the sample
itself, but in the understanding that they can
potentially infer from the sample and then apply
across the entire population.
194. Contd…
• A sample survey usually offers greater scope
than a census. Working within a given resource
constraint, sampling may make it possible to
study the population of a larger geographical
area or to find out more about the same
population by examining an area in greater
depth through a smaller sample.
195. Contd…
• Before we dive into the survey sampling
methods at our disposal it is imperative that we
develop a perspective on what an effective
sample should look like.
196. Features to Keep in Mind While
Constructing a Sample
Consistency
• It is important that researchers understand the
population on a case-by-case basis and test the
sample for consistency before going ahead with
the survey.
197. Contd…
• This is especially critical for surveys that track
changes across time and space where we need
to be confident that any change we see in our
data reflects real change – across consistent
and comparable samples.
198. Diversity
• Ensuring diversity of the sample is a tall order,
as reaching some portions of the population and
convincing them to participate in the survey
could be difficult.
• But to be truly representative of the population, a
sample must be as diverse as the population
itself and sensitive to the local differences that
are unavoidable as we move across the
population.
199. Transparency
• There are several constraints that dictate the
size and structure of the population.
• It is imperative that researchers discuss these
limitations and maintain transparency about the
procedures followed while selecting the sample
so that the results of the survey are seen with
the right perspective.
200. Contd…
• Now that we understand the necessity of
choosing the right sample and have a vision of
what an effective sample for your survey should
be like, let’s explore the various methods of
constructing a sample and understand the
relative pros and cons of each of these
approaches.
203. Area/s to be discussed.
• Sampling Techniques: continues
204. Sampling Techniques
Random Sampling
• When: There is a very large population and it is
difficult to identify every member of the
population.
• How: The entire process of sampling is done in
a single step with each subject selected
independently of the other members of the
population. The term random has a very precise
meaning and you can’t just collect responses on
the street and have a random sample.
205. Contd…
• Pros: In this technique, each member of the
population has an equal chance of being
selected as subject.
206. Contd…
• Cons: When there are very large populations, it
is often difficult to identify every member of the
population and the pool of subjects becomes
biased.
• Dialing numbers from a phone book for instance,
may not be entirely random as the numbers,
though random, would correspond to a localized
region. A sample created by doing so might
leave out many sections of the population that
are significant to the study.
207. Contd…
• Use case: Want to study and understand the
rice consumption pattern across rural India?
• While it might not be possible to cover every
household, you could draw meaningful insights
by building your sample from different districts or
villages (depending on the scope).
208. Systematic Sampling
• When: Your given population is logically
homogenous.
• How: In a systematic sample, after you decide
the sample size, arrange the elements of the
population in some order and select terms at
regular intervals from the list.
209. Contd…
• Pros: The main advantage of using systematic
sampling over simple random sampling is its
simplicity.
• Another advantage of systematic random
sampling over simple random sampling is the
assurance that the population will be evenly
sampled. There exists a chance in simple
random sampling that allows a clustered
selection of subjects.
• This can be avoided through systematic
sampling.
210. Contd…
• Cons: The possible weakness of the method
that may compromise the randomness of the
sample is an inherent periodicity of the list.
• This can be avoided by randomizing the list of
your population entities, as you would
randomize a deck of cards for instance, before
you proceed with systematic sampling.
211. Contd…
• Use Case: Suppose a supermarket wants to
study buying habits of their customers.
• Using systematic sampling, they can choose
every 10th or 15th customer entering the
supermarket and conduct the study on this
sample.
212. Stratified Sampling
• When: You can divide your population into
characteristics of importance for the research.
• How: A stratified sample, in essence, tries to
recreate the statistical features of the population
on a smaller scale. Before sampling, the
population is divided into characteristics of
importance for the research — for example, by
gender, social class, education level, religion,
etc.
213. Contd…
• Then the population is randomly sampled within
each category or stratum. If 38% of the
population is college-educated, then 38% of the
sample is randomly selected from the college-
educated subset of the population.
214. Contd…
• Pros: This method attempts to overcome the
shortcomings of random sampling by splitting
the population into various distinct segments
and selecting entities from each of them.
• This ensures that every category of the
population is represented in the sample.
Stratified sampling is often used when one or
more of the sections in the population have a
low incidence relative to the other sections.
215. Contd…
• Cons: Stratified sampling is the most complex
method of sampling. It lays down criteria that
may be difficult to fulfill and place a heavy strain
on your available resources.
216. Contd…
• Use Case: If 38% of the population is college-
educated and 62% of the population have not
been to college, then 38% of the sample is
randomly selected from the college-educated
subset of the population and 62% of the sample
is randomly selected from the non-college-going
population. Maintaining the ratios while selecting
a randomized sample is key to stratified
sampling.
220. Contd…
• In these techniques, the units that make up the
sample are collected with no specific probability
structure in mind. The selection is not completely
randomized, and hence the resultant sample
isn’t truly representative of the population.
221. Convenience Sampling
• When: During preliminary research efforts.
• How: As the name suggests, the elements of
such a sample are picked only on the basis of
convenience in terms of availability, reach and
accessibility.
222. Contd…
• Pros: The sample is created quickly without
adding any additional burden on the available
resources.
• Cons: The likelihood of this approach leading to
a sample that is truly representative of the
population is very poor.
223. Transparency
• Use Case: This method is often used during
preliminary research efforts to get a gross
estimate of the results, without incurring the cost
or time required to select a random sample.
224. Snowball Sampling
• When: When you can rely on your initial
respondents to refer you to the next
respondents.
• How: Just as the snowball rolls and gathers
mass, the sample constructed in this way will
grow in size as you move through the process of
conducting a survey. In this technique, you rely
on your initial respondents to refer you to the
next respondents whom you may connect with
for the purpose of your survey.
225. Contd…
• Pros: The costs associated with this method are
significantly lower, and you will end up with a
sample that is very relevant to your study.
• Cons: The clear downside of this approach is
that you may restrict yourself to only a small,
largely homogenous section of the population.
226. Contd…
• Use Case: Snowball sampling can be useful
when you need the sample to reflect certain
features that are difficult to find.
• To conduct a survey of people who go jogging in
a certain park every morning, for example,
snowball sampling would be a quick, accurate
way to create the sample.
227. Quota Sampling
• When: When you can characterize the
population based on certain desired features.
• How: Quota sampling is the non-probability
equivalent of stratified sampling that we
discussed earlier. It starts with characterizing the
population based on certain desired features
and assigns a quota to each subset of the
population.
228. Contd…
• Pros: This process can be extended to cover
several characteristics and varying degrees of
complexity.
• Cons: Though the method is superior to
convenience and snowball sampling, it does not
offer the statistical insights of any of the
probability methods.
229. Contd…
• Use Case: If a survey requires a sample of fifty
men and fifty women, a quota sample will survey
respondents until the right number of each type
has been surveyed.
• Unlike stratified sampling, the sample isn’t
necessarily randomized.
230. Contd…
• Probability sampling techniques are clearly
superior, but the costs can be prohibitive. For
the initial stages of a study, non-probability
sampling techniques might be sufficient to give
you a sense of what you’re dealing with.
• For detailed insights and results that you can
bank upon, move on to the more sophisticated
techniques as the study gathers pace and takes
a more concrete structure.
231. References & Bibliography
• Baker, T. L. (1994). Doing Social Research (2nd Ed.). Singapore: McGraw Hill.
• Babbie, E., & Rubin, A. (2001). Research Methods for Social Work (4th Ed.). USA:
Wadsworth Thomas Learning
• Barzun, J. and Graff, H. E. (1977) The Modern Researcher, 3rd edition. New York:
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
• Bell, J. (1999). Doing Your Research Project. Buckingham, UK: Multilingual Matters.
• Best, J. W. & Khan, J. V. (2006). Research in Education (9th Ed.). Lahore: Mayo Art Press
• Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1985). Research Methods in Education. Bedeenham: Croom Helm
• Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2003) Research Methods in Education (5th
Edition). Hampshire: Routledge
• Connolly, P. (2007). Quantitative Data Analysis in Education: A Critical Introduction Using
SPSS. New York: Routledge Publishers.
• Creswell, John (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed
• Methods Approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE
• Denscombe, Martin. (1998). The Good Research Guide: For Small Scale Social Research
• Projects. Buckingham: Open University Press
• Dey, Ian. (1993). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Routledge, 11 New Fetter Lane
• Finnan, C. 1992 Becoming an Accelerated Middle School: Initiating School Culture
Change.
232. Contd…
• Firestone, W. and Pennell, J. 1993 Teacher Commitment, Working Conditions, and
Differential Incentive Policies. Review of Educational Research, 63, 489-525.
• Gay, L.R. 2000 Educational Research (5th Edition) Islamabad: National Book Foundation.
• Goddard, Wayne and Melville, Stuart (2001) 2nd ed. Research Methodology: An
• Introduction. Lansdowne: Juta and Company Limited
• Henson, K.T. 1996 Teachers as researchers. In J. Sikula, (ed.) Handbook of research on
• teacher education. (2nd edition.) New York, NY: Macmillan.
• Johnson, A. P. 2005 A Short Guide to Action Research. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
• Johnston, M. 1990 Experience and Reflection on Collaborative Research. International
• Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. Vol. 3, No. 2, pp 172-183
• Kumar, Ranjit. (2005). Research Methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. 2nd ed.,
London: SAGE
• Leary, Z. O. (2004). The Essential Guide to Doing Research. New Delhi: Vistar
Publications
• Leonard, D. (2001) A Woman’s Guide to Doctoral Studies. Buckingham, UK: Open
University Press.
• Lieberman, A. (1986). Collaborative research: Working with, not Working on – Educational
Leadership, 43 (5), 28-32.
• Linn, R. L. & Gronlund, N. E. (1999). Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. USA:
Prentice Hall Publishers
233. Contd…
• Lodico, M. G., Spaulding, D. T. & Voegtle, K. H. (2006). Methods in Educational
Research: From Theory to Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers
• McCarthy, J. and Riner, P. 1996 The Accelerated Schools Inquiry Process:
Teacher
• Empowerment through Action Research. Education v 117, n2, 223-230.
• McMillan, J. H. and Schumacher, S (1989) Research education- a conceptual
introduction (2nd Ed) UK: Harper Collins
• Mertler, C.. A. (2006). Action Research: Teachers as Researchers in the
Classroom. USA: Sage Publications
• Moses, I. 1995 Supervising Postgraduates, HERDSA Green Guide No. 3.
• Moses, I. 1992 Research Training and Supervision, AVCC and NBEET:
Canberra
• Nunan, D. (1992) Research Methods in Language Learning. Cambridge:
Cambridge
• University Press
• Oja, S. and Pine, G. 1989 Action Research on Change in Schools (ARCS)
Project. In Webb, R. (ed.) 1990 Practitioner Research in the Primary School.
London: The Falmer Press
• Palo Alto, CA: The Accelerated Schools Project, Stanford University.
234. Contd…
• O’Leary, Z. (2004) The Essential Guide to Doing Research. New Delhi:
Vistaar Publications
• Qadir, S. A 1995 ‘Implementation of a reading Innovation in the classrooms
of Multan’.
• Journal of Research (Humanities). Vol.XXIX No. 1-2. Universirty of the
Punjab, Lahore.
• Salkind, N. J. (1997). Exploring Research, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Serlin, R. C., & Conrad, C. F. (2006). The Sage Handbook for Research in
Education: Engaging Ideas and Enriching Inquiry. Thousand Oaks: The
Sage Publications
• Trochim, W. M. K. (2006). Research Methods Knowledge Base. Last
Revised: 01/20/2006. Retrieved January 05, 2009 from
• http://www.socialreserach.methods.net/kb/order.php
• Tuckman, B. W. (1994). Conducting Educational Research (4th Ed). USA:
The Ohio State University
• Wiersma, William. (2000). Research Methods in Education: An Introduction.
USA: Allyn & Bacon, A Pearson Education Company
• Wolcott, F. H. (2001). Writing Up Qualitative Research 2nd Edition.
California: Sage Publications
236. Area/s to be discussed.
Ethical considerations in research.
237. The Ethics of Research
• In planning the actual procedures of study, there
are a number of factors that should be considered.
Two of these factors, the ethics of conducting
research and legal restrictions are relevant to all
research studies.
238. Contd…
• There are ethical considerations involved in all
research studies.
• Ethical concerns are, of course, more acute in
experimental studies, which by definition,
“manipulate” and “control” subjects.
• The ends do not justify the means and perhaps
the foremost rule of ethics is that subjects should
not be harmed in any way (physically or
mentally) in the name of science.
239. Contd…
• The subject’s right to privacy is also an important
consideration.
• Collecting information on subjects or observing
them without their knowledge or without
appropriate permission is not ethical.
• Furthermore, any information or data, which are
collected, either form or about a subject, should
be strictly confidential, especially if it is at all
personal.
240. Contd…
• Probably the most definitive source of ethical
guidelines for researchers is Ethical Principles in
the Conduct of Research with Human
Participants, which was prepared for, and
published by, the American Psychological
Association (APA).
241. Contd…
• In the APA these principles are preceded by a
statement to the effect that research should be
conducted”… with respect and concern for the
dignity and welfare of the people who participate
and with cognizance of federal and state
regulations and professional standards
governing the conduct of research with human
participants”.
242. Contd…
• Above all, the researcher must have personal
integrity.
• The reader of a research report must be able to
believe that what the researcher says happened,
really happened: otherwise it is all for nothing.
• Falsifying data in order to make findings agree
with a hypothesis is unprofessional, unethical,
and unforgivable.
243. Why does Research with Human and
Animal Participants Require Ethical
Approval?
• To protect the rights and welfare of participants
and minimise the risk of physical and mental
discomfort, harm and/or danger from research
procedures
• To protect the rights of the researcher to carry
out any legitimate investigation as well as the
reputation of the University for research
conducted and/or sponsored by it.
244. Contd…
• To minimise the likelihood of claims of
negligence against individual researchers, the
University and any collaborating persons or
organisations.
• Because Research Funding bodies and refereed
journals increasingly require a statement of
ethical practices in applications for research
funds and/or as a condition for publication.
245. Participant-Centred Perspective
• To ensure that these principles are adhered to it
is essential that a participant-centred approach
is adopted. It must not be forgotten that research
participants make a significant contribution to the
progress and promise of research in advancing
knowledge.
246. Contd…
• Collaboration between participants and
researchers is important and helps to ensure
that the interests of the participants are central
to the work, that they will not be treated simply
as objects and that their concerns will be
listened to.
247. Contd…
• However, a participant-centred approach must
also acknowledge that researchers and research
participants may not always see the harms and
benefits of a research project in the same way.
• Indeed, individual participants within the same
study may respond very differently to the
information provided in the free and informed
consent process; this can be important and
these individual perspectives must be
considered.
248. Ethical Issues Within the Research
Process itself
• When considering research involving human
participants issues to be taken into account will
include consideration of whether the research
has been done before and whether there are
consistent results in this area.
• This will be based on examination of the
literature review and the justification of the need
for the study.
250. Area/s to be discussed.
• (Parts of Report, Review & Referencing).
251. Research Process
• Formulating the research problem
• Extensive literature survey
• Development of working hypotheses
How does one go about developing working
hypotheses? The answer is by using the following
approach:
a) Discussions with colleagues and experts about the
problem, its origin and the objectives in seeking a
solution;
b) Examination of data and records, if available, concerning
the problem for possible trends, peculiarities and other
clues;
252. Contd…
a)Review of similar studies in the area or of the
studies on similar problems; and
b)Exploratory personal investigation which
involves original field interviews on a limited
scale with interested parties and individuals with
a view to secure greater insight into the practical
aspects of the problem.
253. • Preparing the research design
The preparation of the research design, appropriate for a
particular research problem, involves usually the
consideration of the following:
1. the means of obtaining the information;
2. the availability and skills of the researcher and his staff
(if any);
3. .
254. Contd…
1.explanation of the way in which selected means
of obtaining information will be organised and
the reasoning leading to the selection;
2.the time available for research; and
3.the cost factor relating to research, i.e., the
finance available for the purpose
255. • Collecting the data
• By observation
• Through personal interview
• Through telephone interviews
• By mailing of questionnaires
• Through schedules
• The researcher should select one of these
methods of collecting the data taking into
consideration the nature of investigation,
objective and scope of the inquiry, finanicial
resources, available time and the desired
degree of accuracy.
256. Contd…
• Though he should pay attention to all these
factors but much depends upon the ability and
experience of the researcher. In this context Dr
A.L. Bowley very aptly remarks that in collection
of statistical data commonsense is the chief
requisite and experience the chief teacher.
257. Execution of the project
Analysis of data
Hypothesis-testing
Generalisations and interpretation
Preparation of the report or the thesis
Finally, the researcher has to prepare the report of
what has been done by him. Writing of report must be
done with great care keeping in view the following:
1. The layout of the report should be as follows: (i) the
preliminary pages; (ii) the main text, and (iii) the end
matter. In its preliminary pages the report should carry
title and date followed by acknowledgements and
foreword. Then there should be a table of contents
followed by a list of tables and list of graphs and
charts, if any, given in the report.
258. Contd…
• The main text of the report should have the
following parts:
(a) Introduction: It should contain a clear statement
of the objective of the research and
an explanation of the methodology adopted in
accomplishing the research. The scope of the
study along with various limitations should as well
be stated in this part.
259. Contd…
(b) Summary of findings: After introduction there
would appear a statement of findings and
recommendations in non-technical language. If the
findings are extensive, they should be
summarised.
(c) Main report: The main body of the report should
be presented in logical sequence and
broken-down into readily identifiable sections.
260. Contd…
• (d) Conclusion: Towards the end of the
main text, researcher should again put
down the results of his research clearly
and precisely.
• In fact, it is the final summing up.
261. Criteria of Good Research
Whatever may be the types of research works and
studies, one thing that is important is that they all
meet on the common ground of scientific method
employed by them. One expects scientific
research
to satisfy the following criteria:
1.The purpose of the research should be clearly
defined and common concepts be used.
262. Contd…
1.The research procedure used should be
described in sufficient detail to permit another
researcher to repeat the research for further
advancement, keeping the continuity of what has
already been attained.
2.The procedural design of the research should be
carefully planned to yield results that are as
objective as possible.
263. 1. The researcher should report with complete
frankness, flaws in procedural design and
estimate their effects upon the findings.
2. The analysis of data should be sufficiently
adequate to reveal its significance and the
methods of analysis used should be
appropriate. The validity and reliability of the
data should be checked carefully.
264. Contd…
1. Conclusions should be confined to those
justified by the data of the research and limited
to those for which the data provide an adequate
basis.
2. Greater confidence in research is warranted if
the researcher is experienced, has a good
reputation in research and is a person of
integrity.
265. In other words, we can state the qualities of a
good research as under:
• Good research is systematic:
• It means that research is structured with
specified steps to be taken in a specified
sequence in accordance with the well defined
set of rules.
• Systematic characteristic of the research does
not rule out creative thinking but it certainly does
reject the use of guessing and intuition in
arriving at conclusions.
266. Contd…
• Good research is logical: This implies that
research is guided by the rules of logical
reasoning and the logical process of induction
and deduction are of great value in carrying out
research.
• Induction is the process of reasoning from a part
to the whole whereas deduction is the process of
reasoning from some premise to a conclusion
which follows from that very premise. In fact,
logical reasoning makes research more
meaningful in the context of decision making.
267. Contd…
• Good research is empirical: It implies that
research is related basically to one or more
aspects of a real situation and deals with
concrete data that provides a basis for external
validity to research results.
• Good research is replicable: This characteristic
allows research results to be verified by
replicating the study and thereby building a
sound basis for decisions.
268. The purpose of research is to…
• Review or synthesize existing knowledge
• Investigate existing situations or problems
• Provide solutions to problems
• Explore and analyse more general issues
• Construct or create new procedures or systems
• Explain new phenomenon
• Generate new knowledge
• …or a combination of any of the above! (Collis &
Hussey, 2003)
269. DIFFERENT TYPES OF RESEARCH
Exploratory Descriptive Analytical Predictive
Exploratory
research
is undertaken when
few or no previous
studies exist. The
aim is to look for
patterns,
hypotheses
or ideas that can be
tested and will form
the basis for
further
research. Typical
research
techniques would
include case
studies,
observation and
reviews of previous
related studies and
data.
Descriptive
research
can be used to
identify and
classify
the elements or
characteristics of
the subject, e.g.
number of days
lost because of
industrial action.
Quantitative
techniques are
most
often used to
collect, analyse
and summarise
data.
Analytical
research
often extends the
Descriptive
approach to
suggest or explain
why or how
something is
happening, e.g.
underlying causes
of industrial
action.
An important
feature of this
type of research is
in locating and
identifying the
different factors
(or variable
The aim of
Predictive
research
is to speculate
intelligently on
future
possibilities,
based on close
analysis of
available evidence
of cause and
effect, e.g.
predicting when
and where future
industrial action
might take place
270. Research Approaches
Research can be approached in the following
ways:
• Quantitative/Qualitative
• Applied/Basic
• Deductive/Inductive
271. QUANTITATIVE/QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Quantitative Qualitative
The emphasis of Quantitative
research is on collecting and
analysing numerical data; it
concentrates on measuring the
scale, range, frequency etc. of
phenomena.
This type of research, although
harder to design initially, is
usually
highly detailed and structured
and
results can be easily collated and
presented statistically.
Qualitative research is more
subjective in nature than
Quantitative research and
involves examining and
reflecting on the less tangible
aspects of a research subject,
e.g. values, attitudes,
perceptions. Although this type
of research can be easier to
start, it can be often difficult to
interpret and present the
findings; the findings can also
be challenged more easily.
272. BASIC/APPLIED RESEARCH
Deductive Inductive
General ideas
Particular
Situation
Deductive research moves
from general ideas/theories to
specific particular &
situations: the particular is
deduced from the general,
e.g. broad theories.
Particular
Situation
General ideas
Inductive research moves
from
particular situations to make
or infer
broad general
ideas/theories.
273. Examples of Deductive/Inductive
Research in Action
• Imagine you wanted to learn what the word
‘professional’ meant to a range of people.
• Deductive Approach:
It is clear that you would want to have a clear
theoretical position prior to collection of data. You
might therefore research the subject and discover
a number of definitions of ‘professional’ from, for
example, a number of professional associations.
274. Contd…
• You could then test this definition on a range of
people, using a questionnaire, structured
interviews or group discussion. You could
carefully select a sample of people on the basis
of age, gender, occupation etc. The data
gathered could then be collated and the results
analysed and presented. This approach offers
researchers a relatively easy and systematic
way of testing established ideas on a range of
people.
275. Inductive Approach
If you adopted this approach you might start by
talking to a range of people asking for their ideas
and definitions of ‘professional’.
From these discussions you could start to
assemble the common elements and then start to
compare these with definitions gained from
professional associations.
276. Contd…
• The data gathered could then be collated and
the results analysed and presented. This
approach might lead you to arrive at a new
definition of the word – or it might not! This
approach can be very time-consuming, but the
reward might be in terms of arriving at a fresh
way of looking at the subject.
277. RESEARCH PHILIOSOPHIES
Research is not ‘neutral’, but reflects a range of the researcher’s
personal interests, values, abilities, assumptions, aims and ambitions.
In the case of your own proposed research, your own mixtures of these
elements will not only determine the subject of the research, but will
influence your approach to it. It is important to consider in advance
what approach you to take with your research – and why.
278. Contd…
There are essential two main research philosophies (or positions)
although there can be overlap between the two – and both
positions may be identifiable in any research project.
POSITIVISTIC PHENOMENOLOGICAL
(can also be referred to (can also be referred to as
‘Quantitative’, ‘Objectivist’, Qualitative’, ‘Subjectivist’,
‘Scientific’, ‘Experimentalist’ or ‘Humanistic’ or ‘Traditionalist’)
‘Interpretative’
The research philosophy can impact on the methodology
adopted for the research project.
279. RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES
Positivistic Inductive
• Surveys
• Experimental Studies
• Longitudinal Studies
• Cross-sectional Studies
• Case Studies
• Action Research
• Ethnography (participant
• observation)
• Participative Enquiry
• Feminist Perspectives
• Grounded Theory
280. How to give references?
Audio-Visual Media
References to audio-visual media must include the
following elements: name and function of the
primary contributors (e.g., producer, director), date,
title, the medium in brackets, location or place of
production, and name of the distributor. If the
medium in indicated as part of the retrieval ID,
brackets are not needed.
281. Contd…
• Videocassette
Garmon, L. (Producer and Director), & Apsell, P.
(Executive Producer). (1994). Secret of the wild child
[Videocassette]. Boston, MA: WGBH Educational
Foundation.
• Audio Recording
Costa, P. T., Jr. (Speaker). (1988). Personality,
continuity, and changes of adult life (Cassette Recording
No. 207-433-88A-B). Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.
• Motion Picture
Scorsese, M. (Producer), & Lonergan, K.
(Writer/Director). (2000). You can count on me [Motion
Picture]. United States: Paramount Pictures.
282. Examples
• Television Broadcast
Crystal, L. (Executive Producer). (1993, October
11). The MacNeil/Lehrer news hour [Television
broadcast]. New York and Washington, DC:
Public Broadcasting Service.
• Television Series
Miller, R. (Producer). (1989). The mind
[Television series]. New York: WNET.
• Music Recording
Shocked, M. (1992). Over the waterfall. On
Arkansas traveler [CD]. New York: PolyGram
Music.
283. Examples
Electronic Media and Online Sources
APA's recommendations for citing electronic media
call for consistent observation of at least two
important guidelines:
1) Direct readers as closely as possible to the
information being cited -- whenever possible,
reference specific documents rather than home or
menu pages;
2) 2) Provide addresses that work. At a minimum, a
reference of an Internet source should provide a
document or title description, a "date" (either the
date of publication, update, or date of retrieval),
and an address (in Internet terms, a URL).
Whenever possible, identify the authors of the
document as well.
284. Contd…
• Listed below are examples of citation
styles for several types of electronic
sources.
• Internet articles based on a print
source (exists in print and online)
VandenBos, G., Knapp, S., & Doe, J.
(2001). Role of reference elements in the
selection of resources by psychology
undergraduates [Electronic version].
Journal of Bibliographic Research, 5, 117-
123.
285. Examples
• Article in an Internet-only journal
Fredrickson, B. L. (2000, March 7). Cultivating
positive emotions to optimize health and well-being.
Prevention & Treatment, 3, Article 0001a. Retrieved
November 20, 2000, from
http://journals.apa.org/prevention/volume3/pre00300
01a.html
• Article from an online encyclopedia
Bergman, P. G. & Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica
Online. (1994-1999). Relativity. Encyclopedia
Britannica Online. Retrieved August 4, 1999, from
Encyclopedia Britannica Online on the World Wide
Web:
http://search.eb.com/bol/topic?eu=117376&sctn=1
286. Examples
• Professional web site
American Psychological Association. (1999, June 1).
Electronic preference formats recommended by the
American Psychological Association. Retrieved July 18,
1999, from the World Wide Web:
http://www.apa.org/journals/webref.html
• Document available on university program or
department site
Chou, L., McClintock, R., Moretti, F., & Nix, D. H. (1993).
Technology and education: New wine in new bottles:
Choosing pasts and imagining educational futures.
Retrieved August 24, 2000, from Columbia University,
Institute for Learning Technologies Web site:
http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/papers/newwine
1.html
287. Contd…
• When citing an entire web site (and not a
specific document on that site), no Reference
List entry is required if the address for the
site is cited in the text of your paper.
Witchcraft In Europe and America is a site that
presents the full text of many essential works in
the literature of witchcraft and demonology
(http://www.witchcraft.psmedia.com/).
288. Ethical Use of Web-Based Materials
• It is a common mistake to believe that if
something is on the Web and there is no notice
of copyright, it is acceptable to use the
information you may find without acknowledging
your source. This is definitely not the case. All
materials you find on the Web are copyrighted,
regardless of whether or not the individual
document indicates it is copyrighted. As with
materials in print, it is also dishonest and
unethical to use Web-based materials created
by someone else and not give appropriate credit
for the work.
289. Contd…
• When you include information from Web-based
materials in a paper or report, be sure to provide
a complete citation for the site and give the
person credit for his or her work in your paper or
project. Giving people credit for their work is the
right thing to do, and it is also the law. If you do
not cite resources used in a paper, you can be
sued by the author, fail your course, and even
be expelled or suspended from the university.
290. General Guidelines
Journal or magazine articles from
Proprietary/Subscription Web Databases
• If the resource you are citing is from one of
UMUC's Web databases, follow the format
below. If you cannot find some of this
information, cite what is available.
291. Contd…
• Citation Model:
Author's last name, First initial. (date). Article
title. Journal Title,
volume(issue), pages. Retrieved month day,
year,
from Database Name database.
• Example:
Deans, G.K., Kroeger, F., & Zeisel, S. (2002).
The consolidation curve. Harvard Business
Review, 80(12), 20-21. Retrieved April 19, 2004,
from Business Source Premier
database
292. General Guidelines
• Author—The author(s) of the article. APA style
only requires the first initial of author names (for
example, Smith, J. instead of Smith, John). If no
author is given, then the article title should be
listed first, followed by the date.
• Date—Provide in parentheses the year the work
was published. For monthly magazines, use
(year, month); for weekly magazines use (year,
month day).
• Article title—The title of the article. Only
capitalize the initial letter of the article title and
subtitle (for example: Sound bite news:
Television coverage of elections).