SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Cristina de H.C. Tsuha & Nelson Aoki
University of São Paulo / Brazil
RISK EVALUATION ACCORDING TO STANDARDS
Risk
“The term risk implies a combination (the product) of the
probability of an event occurring and the consequences
of the event should it occur”
“Probability of failure is a measure of risk only if all failure modes
result in the same consequences”
Lacasse & Nadim (1998)
Probability and costs of foundation problems
Their impacts
Labor, Materials , Equipment,
Business Costs, Environmental
Costs , Social Costs , Deaths, etc.
Risk cost = x
• Structural collapse
• Excessive settlements
probability of failure cost of failure
1
Risks associated with pile foundation
Design of pile foundations involves many
limitations and uncertanties
DESIGN PROBLEM
GOAL : minimize the risks
(acceptable level/ economical)
Limited calculation models
Limited ground investigation
Uncertanties in ground parameters
Spatial variability
Bauduin (2003)
2
R1
Rn
Ri
R4
R3
R2
Variability of pile resistance in a construction project
Resistance (kN)
Example of a
construction project
R mean = 3295 kN
Standard deviation = 483 kN
Coefficient of variation = 14,7 %
Dynamic measurements
(CAPWAP) on 74 piles
Frequency(%)
3
R1
Rn
Ri
R4
R3
R2
E1
Ei EnE4
E3
E2
Action effect : E
E = action effects
E ,  E
vE = E / E
Coef. de variation of action effects
4
R-E should be > 0
Mathematically:
pile does not fail
Margin of safety (M = R-E)
M
σM
mM
pf
y
0
Probability of failure and Reliability index β
β = µZ / σZ
22
ER
ER






Normally distributed random variable
5
β
Lognormal distribution
  


















)1(1ln
1
1
ln
22
2
2
RE
R
E
E
R
vv
v
v



6
Probability of failure and Reliability index β
Formulations (Freudenthal) involved convolution functions
(R and E distribution) to obtain pf
Probability of failure and Reliability index β
7
Probabilistic Deterministic
x
y
µR
vR2
µE
vE
µR
‘
vR3vR1
µRµR
Allowable Stress Design
E
R
F calc
S 
constant Fs
same Fs ≠ pf
Allowable Stress Design
8
Safety factor and probability of failure
The factor of safety is therefore not a sufficient indicator of safety margin because the
uncertainties in the analysis parameters affect probahility of failure
uncertainties do not interven in the deterministic calculation of safety factor.
9
Lacasse & Nadim (1998)
Reliability levels of a construction project
Level zero: deterministic methods
random variables are taken as deterministic and uncertainties are taken into
account by a global safety factor (based on past experience)
Level I: semi-probabilistic methods
deterministic formulas are applied to representative values of RVs multiplied by
partial SFs. The characteristic values are calculated based on statistical
information/ the partial SFs are based on level II or level III reliability methods
Level II: approximate probabilistic methods
RVs are characterised by their distribution and statisticalparameters probabilistic
evaluation of safety achieved using approximate numerical techniques
Level III: full probabilistic methods
Techniques that take into account all of the probabilistic characteristics of the RVs
Level IV: risk analysis
probabilistic characteristics & consequences of failure are taken into account
The level of accuracy depends on the way that uncertainties are considered in the design
(Teixeira et al. 2012)
10
Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD)
LRFD is appropriate for geotechnical designs because:
the variabilities and uncertainties associated with natural systems (the ground in this
case) are much greater than those associated with well-controlled engineered
systems
The specifications were calibrated based on a combination of simplistic reliability
analysis, fitting to WSD and engineering judgment.
11
Lacasse & Nadim (1998)
(Paikowsky 2004)
 Load and Resistance factor design
Separate uncertanties in loading from uncertanties in resistance
Use procedures from probability theories
LRFD requires a selection of a set of target reliability levels (β)
LRFD formulation – Pile foundations
12
 Traditional design
E
R
F calc
S 
Single (Global) Safety Factor
(margin for error and uncertainty in actions and resistances)
Design value of
action effect
 LRFD, Partial factor method (Eurocode 7)
Limit state design concept with partial factors and
characteristics values
Ed  Rd
Design value of
resistance
to obtain appropriate levels
of reliability (RBD methods)
related to a specific
calculation model
LRFD equations – Pile Foundations
13
Ed  Rd
Compressive resistance
. 	" "	 .
partial factor
on pile
resistance
(European)
characteristic pile
resistance
partial factors of permanent and variable
action effect
;
+ ;
base shaftCharacteristic pile resistance Rk:
• Uncertanties related to calculation method
• Variability over the construction site
∅	. 	
reduction
factor
(other codes)
Calibration of partial factors
14
Eurocode (EN 1990)
Partial factors linked to reliability index β
15
Low probability
of failure
Ex: β = 3.8, Pf = 7.2 x 10-5
Partial factors (gvalues)
Reliability levels for representative structures as
close as possible to the target reliability index bT
reliability index β
Related to a probability of failure
Quantity to evaluate “safety”
Density functions
of R and E
E, E , vE
R, R , vR
Partial factors linked to reliability index β
16
FOSM reliability formulas
Lognormal distribution is often used:
Sensitivity factors
E and vE ?
R and vR ?
Partial factors linked to reliability index β
17
R = P . Rcal
Bias of the resistance funcion
E = E . Ek
Bias for the actionVE and VR ?
Model uncertainty (P and Vp )
Variability of R over the site ( )
Variability of effects of execution (monitoring)
Model uncertanty
18
Bauduin (2003)
Model uncertanty
Random variable B
VB
mB
R = P . Rcal
coefficient of variation
calculated resistance
If load tests were performed
p% of measured would be lower
than prediction
Model factor m
Reliability of the calculation model
Model uncertanty
19
Bauduin (2003)
Model factor mod
 For normal distribution
 For lognormal distribution
Partial factors (calculation model uncertanty)
20
Design value of resistance Rd
.
;
+ ;
;
+
;
.
1
mod
P and Vp (different types of pile in different types of ground)
Correlation factor : spatial variability
21
Characteristic pile resistance
Ground tests resultsStatic load tests
Spatial variability : 
;
+
;
.
1
.
Stiffness of the structure and monitoring
22
stiffness
Bauduin (2003)
transfer loads from weaker to stronger piles
Favorable effect
monitoring
Reduce uncertanty related to installation effects
Actions (permanent and variable loads)
23
Load factor: F
Bias factor
ACTION EFFECT
Partial factors linked to reliability index β
24
FOSM
Target
reliability
ULS ocurrence: Ed = Rd

 VE VR
reduction
factor
(AASHTO)
∅	.
Brazilian code: NBR 6122 (2010)
 Recognize the risks involved in Foundations
 Introduces the concept of correlation factor  (static load tests &
ground tests) to deal with the spatial variability of pile resistance
25
Static load tests (number and type of piles)
5 dynamic
(CAPWAP)
for 1 static
Estimation of vR using the Brazilian code
Correlation factors 
(static tests)






4
min,
3
,
,
)(
,
)(

mcmeanmc
kc
RR
MinR
Variability of pile resistance (vR or R)
645.1
)( ,, kcmeanmc
R
RR 
 Reliability index
pf = 1-()Probability of failure
22
ER
ER






simple closed form
normal reliability
calculation formula
E and R assumed to be normally distributed
uncertanty of calculations models (based on SPT test) ? ? ?
“ No information about bias of calculation models”
 Estimation of β and Pf
26
P ???
R density distribution
27
R
Obtain R density distribution from:
static tests, dynamic tests, dynamic formula, etc.VR
Example
Resistance (kN)
R measured
Number
of piles
mean
(kN)
COV (%)
Static tests 4 3756 12,3
Capwap 74 3295 14,7
Dynamic formula 2506 3231 16,0
Best fit distribution for R
Formulations (Freudenthal) involved
convolution functions (R and E distribution)
to obtain  and Pf
Update during and after construction
(normal, lognormal, beta, etc.)
Christian 2004, Baecher & Christian 2005, Phoon et al 1995, and Phoon et al. 2003):
• The uncertainties in geotechnical engineering are largely inductive: starting from
limited observations, judgment, knowledge of geology, and statistical reasoning are
employed to infer the behavior of a poorly-defined universe.
• The probabilistic methods help to relieve the foundation engineer from the ill-suited
task of assessing the complex relationship between uncertainties and risks intuitively,
while at the same time emphasizing the importance of engineering judgment and
experience on the other design aspects that are currently beyond the scope of
mathematical analysis.
• The geotechnical engineer’s role is not solely to provide judgment on selection of
parameters, methods of calculations and resulting safety, but also to take an active
part in the evaluation of hazard, vulnerability and risk.
• Communication of risk within a transparent and rational framework is necessary in
view of increasing interest in code harmonization public involvement in defining
acceptable risk levels, and risk-sharing among client, consultant, insurer, and financier.
Advantages of employing RBD
• The probability theory can provide a formal framework for developing design criteria
that would ensure that the probability of "failure" (to refer to exceeding of any
prescribed limit state) is acceptably small.
28
Formalization
of uncertanty
and risk
Partial
factors
Brazilian
Standard
29
Conclusions
Uncertanties
Design of pile
foundations

More Related Content

Similar to Risk evaluation according to standards cristina de hc tsuha

A Comprehensive Analysis of Foundation Design Approaches
A Comprehensive Analysis of Foundation Design ApproachesA Comprehensive Analysis of Foundation Design Approaches
A Comprehensive Analysis of Foundation Design Approaches
Samirsinh Parmar
 
DSUS_SDM2012_Jie
DSUS_SDM2012_JieDSUS_SDM2012_Jie
DSUS_SDM2012_Jie
MDO_Lab
 
Bayes Inspired Research and Applications.pdf
Bayes Inspired Research and Applications.pdfBayes Inspired Research and Applications.pdf
Bayes Inspired Research and Applications.pdf
MichaelNielsen583859
 
RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE BEAMS: A Complete Review
RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE BEAMS: A Complete ReviewRELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE BEAMS: A Complete Review
RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE BEAMS: A Complete Review
IRJET Journal
 
Reliability Analysis of Slope Stability by Central Point Method
Reliability Analysis of Slope Stability by Central Point MethodReliability Analysis of Slope Stability by Central Point Method
Reliability Analysis of Slope Stability by Central Point Method
IJERA Editor
 
“Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering (PBHE) framework”. Structural Safety...
“Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering (PBHE) framework”. Structural Safety...“Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering (PBHE) framework”. Structural Safety...
“Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering (PBHE) framework”. Structural Safety...Francesco Petrini
 
Reliability Analysis of Jacket Platforms in Malaysia-Environmental Load Factors
Reliability Analysis of Jacket Platforms in Malaysia-Environmental Load FactorsReliability Analysis of Jacket Platforms in Malaysia-Environmental Load Factors
Reliability Analysis of Jacket Platforms in Malaysia-Environmental Load FactorsNelson Cossa
 
STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT WITH STOCHASTIC PARAMETERS
STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT WITH STOCHASTIC PARAMETERSSTRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT WITH STOCHASTIC PARAMETERS
STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT WITH STOCHASTIC PARAMETERS
P singh
 
Quality By Design
Quality By DesignQuality By Design
Quality By Design
realmayank
 
Soil-structure interaction uncertainties and their effects on the development...
Soil-structure interaction uncertainties and their effects on the development...Soil-structure interaction uncertainties and their effects on the development...
Soil-structure interaction uncertainties and their effects on the development...
Ali Saeidi
 
Innovative Design Approaches to Improve Disaster Resilience and Reduced Cost ...
Innovative Design Approaches to Improve Disaster Resilience and Reduced Cost ...Innovative Design Approaches to Improve Disaster Resilience and Reduced Cost ...
Innovative Design Approaches to Improve Disaster Resilience and Reduced Cost ...
AIT Solutions
 
IRJET- Risk Modelling in Highway Construction Project using Regression and Fa...
IRJET- Risk Modelling in Highway Construction Project using Regression and Fa...IRJET- Risk Modelling in Highway Construction Project using Regression and Fa...
IRJET- Risk Modelling in Highway Construction Project using Regression and Fa...
IRJET Journal
 
Week 5 realibility measures1
Week 5 realibility measures1Week 5 realibility measures1
Optimum penetration depth of cantilever sheet pile walls in dry granular soil
Optimum penetration depth of cantilever sheet pile walls in dry granular soil Optimum penetration depth of cantilever sheet pile walls in dry granular soil
Optimum penetration depth of cantilever sheet pile walls in dry granular soil
Ahmed Ebid
 
Adaptive response surface by kriging using pilot points for structural reliab...
Adaptive response surface by kriging using pilot points for structural reliab...Adaptive response surface by kriging using pilot points for structural reliab...
Adaptive response surface by kriging using pilot points for structural reliab...
IOSR Journals
 
Quantifying Risk of End Result Specifications
Quantifying Risk of End Result SpecificationsQuantifying Risk of End Result Specifications
Quantifying Risk of End Result Specifications
California Asphalt Pavement Association
 
Recent Trends and Advancement in Performance Assessment of RC High-Rise Build...
Recent Trends and Advancement in Performance Assessment of RC High-Rise Build...Recent Trends and Advancement in Performance Assessment of RC High-Rise Build...
Recent Trends and Advancement in Performance Assessment of RC High-Rise Build...
AIT Solutions
 
Integrating cost, schedule, and technical performance
Integrating cost, schedule, and technical performanceIntegrating cost, schedule, and technical performance
Integrating cost, schedule, and technical performance
Glen Alleman
 
112 risk- metrics for risk reduction
112 risk- metrics for risk reduction112 risk- metrics for risk reduction
112 risk- metrics for risk reduction
Dr Fereidoun Dejahang
 
AIAA-MAO-DSUS-2012
AIAA-MAO-DSUS-2012AIAA-MAO-DSUS-2012
AIAA-MAO-DSUS-2012
OptiModel
 

Similar to Risk evaluation according to standards cristina de hc tsuha (20)

A Comprehensive Analysis of Foundation Design Approaches
A Comprehensive Analysis of Foundation Design ApproachesA Comprehensive Analysis of Foundation Design Approaches
A Comprehensive Analysis of Foundation Design Approaches
 
DSUS_SDM2012_Jie
DSUS_SDM2012_JieDSUS_SDM2012_Jie
DSUS_SDM2012_Jie
 
Bayes Inspired Research and Applications.pdf
Bayes Inspired Research and Applications.pdfBayes Inspired Research and Applications.pdf
Bayes Inspired Research and Applications.pdf
 
RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE BEAMS: A Complete Review
RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE BEAMS: A Complete ReviewRELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE BEAMS: A Complete Review
RELIABILITY ANALYSIS OF CONCRETE BEAMS: A Complete Review
 
Reliability Analysis of Slope Stability by Central Point Method
Reliability Analysis of Slope Stability by Central Point MethodReliability Analysis of Slope Stability by Central Point Method
Reliability Analysis of Slope Stability by Central Point Method
 
“Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering (PBHE) framework”. Structural Safety...
“Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering (PBHE) framework”. Structural Safety...“Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering (PBHE) framework”. Structural Safety...
“Performance-Based Hurricane Engineering (PBHE) framework”. Structural Safety...
 
Reliability Analysis of Jacket Platforms in Malaysia-Environmental Load Factors
Reliability Analysis of Jacket Platforms in Malaysia-Environmental Load FactorsReliability Analysis of Jacket Platforms in Malaysia-Environmental Load Factors
Reliability Analysis of Jacket Platforms in Malaysia-Environmental Load Factors
 
STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT WITH STOCHASTIC PARAMETERS
STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT WITH STOCHASTIC PARAMETERSSTRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT WITH STOCHASTIC PARAMETERS
STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT WITH STOCHASTIC PARAMETERS
 
Quality By Design
Quality By DesignQuality By Design
Quality By Design
 
Soil-structure interaction uncertainties and their effects on the development...
Soil-structure interaction uncertainties and their effects on the development...Soil-structure interaction uncertainties and their effects on the development...
Soil-structure interaction uncertainties and their effects on the development...
 
Innovative Design Approaches to Improve Disaster Resilience and Reduced Cost ...
Innovative Design Approaches to Improve Disaster Resilience and Reduced Cost ...Innovative Design Approaches to Improve Disaster Resilience and Reduced Cost ...
Innovative Design Approaches to Improve Disaster Resilience and Reduced Cost ...
 
IRJET- Risk Modelling in Highway Construction Project using Regression and Fa...
IRJET- Risk Modelling in Highway Construction Project using Regression and Fa...IRJET- Risk Modelling in Highway Construction Project using Regression and Fa...
IRJET- Risk Modelling in Highway Construction Project using Regression and Fa...
 
Week 5 realibility measures1
Week 5 realibility measures1Week 5 realibility measures1
Week 5 realibility measures1
 
Optimum penetration depth of cantilever sheet pile walls in dry granular soil
Optimum penetration depth of cantilever sheet pile walls in dry granular soil Optimum penetration depth of cantilever sheet pile walls in dry granular soil
Optimum penetration depth of cantilever sheet pile walls in dry granular soil
 
Adaptive response surface by kriging using pilot points for structural reliab...
Adaptive response surface by kriging using pilot points for structural reliab...Adaptive response surface by kriging using pilot points for structural reliab...
Adaptive response surface by kriging using pilot points for structural reliab...
 
Quantifying Risk of End Result Specifications
Quantifying Risk of End Result SpecificationsQuantifying Risk of End Result Specifications
Quantifying Risk of End Result Specifications
 
Recent Trends and Advancement in Performance Assessment of RC High-Rise Build...
Recent Trends and Advancement in Performance Assessment of RC High-Rise Build...Recent Trends and Advancement in Performance Assessment of RC High-Rise Build...
Recent Trends and Advancement in Performance Assessment of RC High-Rise Build...
 
Integrating cost, schedule, and technical performance
Integrating cost, schedule, and technical performanceIntegrating cost, schedule, and technical performance
Integrating cost, schedule, and technical performance
 
112 risk- metrics for risk reduction
112 risk- metrics for risk reduction112 risk- metrics for risk reduction
112 risk- metrics for risk reduction
 
AIAA-MAO-DSUS-2012
AIAA-MAO-DSUS-2012AIAA-MAO-DSUS-2012
AIAA-MAO-DSUS-2012
 

More from cfpbolivia

Design and dynamic testing of precast piles oscar varde
Design and dynamic testing of precast piles   oscar vardeDesign and dynamic testing of precast piles   oscar varde
Design and dynamic testing of precast piles oscar varde
cfpbolivia
 
French standard for deep foundations roger frank
French standard for deep foundations   roger frankFrench standard for deep foundations   roger frank
French standard for deep foundations roger frank
cfpbolivia
 
Unisoft software bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
Unisoft software   bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudraultUnisoft software   bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
Unisoft software bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
cfpbolivia
 
The static loading test bengt h. fellenius
The  static loading test   bengt h. felleniusThe  static loading test   bengt h. fellenius
The static loading test bengt h. fellenius
cfpbolivia
 
Static load testing and prediction bengt h. fellenius
Static load testing  and prediction   bengt h. felleniusStatic load testing  and prediction   bengt h. fellenius
Static load testing and prediction bengt h. fellenius
cfpbolivia
 
Ingeniería sostenible de fundaciones profundas alessandro mandolini
Ingeniería sostenible de fundaciones profundas   alessandro mandoliniIngeniería sostenible de fundaciones profundas   alessandro mandolini
Ingeniería sostenible de fundaciones profundas alessandro mandolini
cfpbolivia
 
Spt energy calibration frank rausche
Spt energy calibration  frank rauscheSpt energy calibration  frank rausche
Spt energy calibration frank rausche
cfpbolivia
 
Pda capwap - frank rausche
Pda capwap - frank rauschePda capwap - frank rausche
Pda capwap - frank rausche
cfpbolivia
 
Integrity frank rausche
Integrity  frank rauscheIntegrity  frank rausche
Integrity frank rausche
cfpbolivia
 
Grlweap frank rausche
Grlweap  frank rauscheGrlweap  frank rausche
Grlweap frank rausche
cfpbolivia
 
4.4 integrity gray
4.4   integrity gray4.4   integrity gray
4.4 integrity gray
cfpbolivia
 
3.6 spt energy calibration -gray
3.6   spt energy calibration -gray3.6   spt energy calibration -gray
3.6 spt energy calibration -gray
cfpbolivia
 
2.5 pda-capwap - gray
2.5   pda-capwap - gray2.5   pda-capwap - gray
2.5 pda-capwap - gray
cfpbolivia
 
1.1 grlweap - gray
1.1   grlweap - gray1.1   grlweap - gray
1.1 grlweap - gray
cfpbolivia
 
Bolivia seismic properties k. rainer massarsch
Bolivia seismic properties   k. rainer massarschBolivia seismic properties   k. rainer massarsch
Bolivia seismic properties k. rainer massarsch
cfpbolivia
 
Bolivia driven vibrated piles 04 30.compressed
Bolivia driven vibrated piles 04 30.compressedBolivia driven vibrated piles 04 30.compressed
Bolivia driven vibrated piles 04 30.compressed
cfpbolivia
 
Bolivia driven vibrated piles k. rainer masssarsch
Bolivia driven vibrated piles   k. rainer masssarschBolivia driven vibrated piles   k. rainer masssarsch
Bolivia driven vibrated piles k. rainer masssarsch
cfpbolivia
 
Seismic cpt (scpt) peter robertson
Seismic cpt (scpt)   peter robertsonSeismic cpt (scpt)   peter robertson
Seismic cpt (scpt) peter robertson
cfpbolivia
 
The flat dilatomer test silvano marchetti
The flat dilatomer test   silvano marchettiThe flat dilatomer test   silvano marchetti
The flat dilatomer test silvano marchetti
cfpbolivia
 
Keynote silvano marchetti
Keynote   silvano marchettiKeynote   silvano marchetti
Keynote silvano marchetti
cfpbolivia
 

More from cfpbolivia (20)

Design and dynamic testing of precast piles oscar varde
Design and dynamic testing of precast piles   oscar vardeDesign and dynamic testing of precast piles   oscar varde
Design and dynamic testing of precast piles oscar varde
 
French standard for deep foundations roger frank
French standard for deep foundations   roger frankFrench standard for deep foundations   roger frank
French standard for deep foundations roger frank
 
Unisoft software bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
Unisoft software   bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudraultUnisoft software   bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
Unisoft software bengt h. fellenius, pierre goudrault
 
The static loading test bengt h. fellenius
The  static loading test   bengt h. felleniusThe  static loading test   bengt h. fellenius
The static loading test bengt h. fellenius
 
Static load testing and prediction bengt h. fellenius
Static load testing  and prediction   bengt h. felleniusStatic load testing  and prediction   bengt h. fellenius
Static load testing and prediction bengt h. fellenius
 
Ingeniería sostenible de fundaciones profundas alessandro mandolini
Ingeniería sostenible de fundaciones profundas   alessandro mandoliniIngeniería sostenible de fundaciones profundas   alessandro mandolini
Ingeniería sostenible de fundaciones profundas alessandro mandolini
 
Spt energy calibration frank rausche
Spt energy calibration  frank rauscheSpt energy calibration  frank rausche
Spt energy calibration frank rausche
 
Pda capwap - frank rausche
Pda capwap - frank rauschePda capwap - frank rausche
Pda capwap - frank rausche
 
Integrity frank rausche
Integrity  frank rauscheIntegrity  frank rausche
Integrity frank rausche
 
Grlweap frank rausche
Grlweap  frank rauscheGrlweap  frank rausche
Grlweap frank rausche
 
4.4 integrity gray
4.4   integrity gray4.4   integrity gray
4.4 integrity gray
 
3.6 spt energy calibration -gray
3.6   spt energy calibration -gray3.6   spt energy calibration -gray
3.6 spt energy calibration -gray
 
2.5 pda-capwap - gray
2.5   pda-capwap - gray2.5   pda-capwap - gray
2.5 pda-capwap - gray
 
1.1 grlweap - gray
1.1   grlweap - gray1.1   grlweap - gray
1.1 grlweap - gray
 
Bolivia seismic properties k. rainer massarsch
Bolivia seismic properties   k. rainer massarschBolivia seismic properties   k. rainer massarsch
Bolivia seismic properties k. rainer massarsch
 
Bolivia driven vibrated piles 04 30.compressed
Bolivia driven vibrated piles 04 30.compressedBolivia driven vibrated piles 04 30.compressed
Bolivia driven vibrated piles 04 30.compressed
 
Bolivia driven vibrated piles k. rainer masssarsch
Bolivia driven vibrated piles   k. rainer masssarschBolivia driven vibrated piles   k. rainer masssarsch
Bolivia driven vibrated piles k. rainer masssarsch
 
Seismic cpt (scpt) peter robertson
Seismic cpt (scpt)   peter robertsonSeismic cpt (scpt)   peter robertson
Seismic cpt (scpt) peter robertson
 
The flat dilatomer test silvano marchetti
The flat dilatomer test   silvano marchettiThe flat dilatomer test   silvano marchetti
The flat dilatomer test silvano marchetti
 
Keynote silvano marchetti
Keynote   silvano marchettiKeynote   silvano marchetti
Keynote silvano marchetti
 

Recently uploaded

Democratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek Arya
Democratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek AryaDemocratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek Arya
Democratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek Arya
abh.arya
 
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and servicesPlanning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
JoytuBarua2
 
Automobile Management System Project Report.pdf
Automobile Management System Project Report.pdfAutomobile Management System Project Report.pdf
Automobile Management System Project Report.pdf
Kamal Acharya
 
ASME IX(9) 2007 Full Version .pdf
ASME IX(9)  2007 Full Version       .pdfASME IX(9)  2007 Full Version       .pdf
ASME IX(9) 2007 Full Version .pdf
AhmedHussein950959
 
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
AJAYKUMARPUND1
 
Courier management system project report.pdf
Courier management system project report.pdfCourier management system project report.pdf
Courier management system project report.pdf
Kamal Acharya
 
road safety engineering r s e unit 3.pdf
road safety engineering  r s e unit 3.pdfroad safety engineering  r s e unit 3.pdf
road safety engineering r s e unit 3.pdf
VENKATESHvenky89705
 
Immunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary Attacks
Immunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary AttacksImmunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary Attacks
Immunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary Attacks
gerogepatton
 
Halogenation process of chemical process industries
Halogenation process of chemical process industriesHalogenation process of chemical process industries
Halogenation process of chemical process industries
MuhammadTufail242431
 
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdfHybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
fxintegritypublishin
 
Vaccine management system project report documentation..pdf
Vaccine management system project report documentation..pdfVaccine management system project report documentation..pdf
Vaccine management system project report documentation..pdf
Kamal Acharya
 
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
PrashantGoswami42
 
addressing modes in computer architecture
addressing modes  in computer architectureaddressing modes  in computer architecture
addressing modes in computer architecture
ShahidSultan24
 
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional ElectiveCME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
karthi keyan
 
Student information management system project report ii.pdf
Student information management system project report ii.pdfStudent information management system project report ii.pdf
Student information management system project report ii.pdf
Kamal Acharya
 
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
AafreenAbuthahir2
 
Architectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
Architectural Portfolio Sean LockwoodArchitectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
Architectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
seandesed
 
ethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.ppt
ethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.pptethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.ppt
ethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.ppt
Jayaprasanna4
 
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdfJ.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
MLILAB
 
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&BDesign and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Sreedhar Chowdam
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Democratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek Arya
Democratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek AryaDemocratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek Arya
Democratizing Fuzzing at Scale by Abhishek Arya
 
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and servicesPlanning Of Procurement o different goods and services
Planning Of Procurement o different goods and services
 
Automobile Management System Project Report.pdf
Automobile Management System Project Report.pdfAutomobile Management System Project Report.pdf
Automobile Management System Project Report.pdf
 
ASME IX(9) 2007 Full Version .pdf
ASME IX(9)  2007 Full Version       .pdfASME IX(9)  2007 Full Version       .pdf
ASME IX(9) 2007 Full Version .pdf
 
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
Pile Foundation by Venkatesh Taduvai (Sub Geotechnical Engineering II)-conver...
 
Courier management system project report.pdf
Courier management system project report.pdfCourier management system project report.pdf
Courier management system project report.pdf
 
road safety engineering r s e unit 3.pdf
road safety engineering  r s e unit 3.pdfroad safety engineering  r s e unit 3.pdf
road safety engineering r s e unit 3.pdf
 
Immunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary Attacks
Immunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary AttacksImmunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary Attacks
Immunizing Image Classifiers Against Localized Adversary Attacks
 
Halogenation process of chemical process industries
Halogenation process of chemical process industriesHalogenation process of chemical process industries
Halogenation process of chemical process industries
 
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdfHybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
Hybrid optimization of pumped hydro system and solar- Engr. Abdul-Azeez.pdf
 
Vaccine management system project report documentation..pdf
Vaccine management system project report documentation..pdfVaccine management system project report documentation..pdf
Vaccine management system project report documentation..pdf
 
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
Quality defects in TMT Bars, Possible causes and Potential Solutions.
 
addressing modes in computer architecture
addressing modes  in computer architectureaddressing modes  in computer architecture
addressing modes in computer architecture
 
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional ElectiveCME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
CME397 Surface Engineering- Professional Elective
 
Student information management system project report ii.pdf
Student information management system project report ii.pdfStudent information management system project report ii.pdf
Student information management system project report ii.pdf
 
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
WATER CRISIS and its solutions-pptx 1234
 
Architectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
Architectural Portfolio Sean LockwoodArchitectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
Architectural Portfolio Sean Lockwood
 
ethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.ppt
ethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.pptethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.ppt
ethical hacking in wireless-hacking1.ppt
 
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdfJ.Yang,  ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
J.Yang, ICLR 2024, MLILAB, KAIST AI.pdf
 
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&BDesign and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
Design and Analysis of Algorithms-DP,Backtracking,Graphs,B&B
 

Risk evaluation according to standards cristina de hc tsuha

  • 1. Cristina de H.C. Tsuha & Nelson Aoki University of São Paulo / Brazil RISK EVALUATION ACCORDING TO STANDARDS
  • 2. Risk “The term risk implies a combination (the product) of the probability of an event occurring and the consequences of the event should it occur” “Probability of failure is a measure of risk only if all failure modes result in the same consequences” Lacasse & Nadim (1998) Probability and costs of foundation problems Their impacts Labor, Materials , Equipment, Business Costs, Environmental Costs , Social Costs , Deaths, etc. Risk cost = x • Structural collapse • Excessive settlements probability of failure cost of failure 1
  • 3. Risks associated with pile foundation Design of pile foundations involves many limitations and uncertanties DESIGN PROBLEM GOAL : minimize the risks (acceptable level/ economical) Limited calculation models Limited ground investigation Uncertanties in ground parameters Spatial variability Bauduin (2003) 2
  • 4. R1 Rn Ri R4 R3 R2 Variability of pile resistance in a construction project Resistance (kN) Example of a construction project R mean = 3295 kN Standard deviation = 483 kN Coefficient of variation = 14,7 % Dynamic measurements (CAPWAP) on 74 piles Frequency(%) 3
  • 5. R1 Rn Ri R4 R3 R2 E1 Ei EnE4 E3 E2 Action effect : E E = action effects E ,  E vE = E / E Coef. de variation of action effects 4
  • 6. R-E should be > 0 Mathematically: pile does not fail Margin of safety (M = R-E) M σM mM pf y 0 Probability of failure and Reliability index β β = µZ / σZ 22 ER ER       Normally distributed random variable 5 β
  • 7. Lognormal distribution                      )1(1ln 1 1 ln 22 2 2 RE R E E R vv v v    6 Probability of failure and Reliability index β
  • 8. Formulations (Freudenthal) involved convolution functions (R and E distribution) to obtain pf Probability of failure and Reliability index β 7 Probabilistic Deterministic
  • 9. x y µR vR2 µE vE µR ‘ vR3vR1 µRµR Allowable Stress Design E R F calc S  constant Fs same Fs ≠ pf Allowable Stress Design 8
  • 10. Safety factor and probability of failure The factor of safety is therefore not a sufficient indicator of safety margin because the uncertainties in the analysis parameters affect probahility of failure uncertainties do not interven in the deterministic calculation of safety factor. 9 Lacasse & Nadim (1998)
  • 11. Reliability levels of a construction project Level zero: deterministic methods random variables are taken as deterministic and uncertainties are taken into account by a global safety factor (based on past experience) Level I: semi-probabilistic methods deterministic formulas are applied to representative values of RVs multiplied by partial SFs. The characteristic values are calculated based on statistical information/ the partial SFs are based on level II or level III reliability methods Level II: approximate probabilistic methods RVs are characterised by their distribution and statisticalparameters probabilistic evaluation of safety achieved using approximate numerical techniques Level III: full probabilistic methods Techniques that take into account all of the probabilistic characteristics of the RVs Level IV: risk analysis probabilistic characteristics & consequences of failure are taken into account The level of accuracy depends on the way that uncertainties are considered in the design (Teixeira et al. 2012) 10
  • 12. Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) LRFD is appropriate for geotechnical designs because: the variabilities and uncertainties associated with natural systems (the ground in this case) are much greater than those associated with well-controlled engineered systems The specifications were calibrated based on a combination of simplistic reliability analysis, fitting to WSD and engineering judgment. 11 Lacasse & Nadim (1998) (Paikowsky 2004)  Load and Resistance factor design Separate uncertanties in loading from uncertanties in resistance Use procedures from probability theories LRFD requires a selection of a set of target reliability levels (β)
  • 13. LRFD formulation – Pile foundations 12  Traditional design E R F calc S  Single (Global) Safety Factor (margin for error and uncertainty in actions and resistances) Design value of action effect  LRFD, Partial factor method (Eurocode 7) Limit state design concept with partial factors and characteristics values Ed  Rd Design value of resistance to obtain appropriate levels of reliability (RBD methods) related to a specific calculation model
  • 14. LRFD equations – Pile Foundations 13 Ed  Rd Compressive resistance . " " . partial factor on pile resistance (European) characteristic pile resistance partial factors of permanent and variable action effect ; + ; base shaftCharacteristic pile resistance Rk: • Uncertanties related to calculation method • Variability over the construction site ∅ . reduction factor (other codes)
  • 15. Calibration of partial factors 14 Eurocode (EN 1990)
  • 16. Partial factors linked to reliability index β 15 Low probability of failure Ex: β = 3.8, Pf = 7.2 x 10-5 Partial factors (gvalues) Reliability levels for representative structures as close as possible to the target reliability index bT reliability index β Related to a probability of failure Quantity to evaluate “safety” Density functions of R and E E, E , vE R, R , vR
  • 17. Partial factors linked to reliability index β 16 FOSM reliability formulas Lognormal distribution is often used: Sensitivity factors E and vE ? R and vR ?
  • 18. Partial factors linked to reliability index β 17 R = P . Rcal Bias of the resistance funcion E = E . Ek Bias for the actionVE and VR ? Model uncertainty (P and Vp ) Variability of R over the site ( ) Variability of effects of execution (monitoring)
  • 19. Model uncertanty 18 Bauduin (2003) Model uncertanty Random variable B VB mB R = P . Rcal coefficient of variation calculated resistance If load tests were performed p% of measured would be lower than prediction Model factor m Reliability of the calculation model
  • 20. Model uncertanty 19 Bauduin (2003) Model factor mod  For normal distribution  For lognormal distribution
  • 21. Partial factors (calculation model uncertanty) 20 Design value of resistance Rd . ; + ; ; + ; . 1 mod P and Vp (different types of pile in different types of ground)
  • 22. Correlation factor : spatial variability 21 Characteristic pile resistance Ground tests resultsStatic load tests Spatial variability :  ; + ; . 1 .
  • 23. Stiffness of the structure and monitoring 22 stiffness Bauduin (2003) transfer loads from weaker to stronger piles Favorable effect monitoring Reduce uncertanty related to installation effects
  • 24. Actions (permanent and variable loads) 23 Load factor: F Bias factor ACTION EFFECT
  • 25. Partial factors linked to reliability index β 24 FOSM Target reliability ULS ocurrence: Ed = Rd   VE VR reduction factor (AASHTO) ∅ .
  • 26. Brazilian code: NBR 6122 (2010)  Recognize the risks involved in Foundations  Introduces the concept of correlation factor  (static load tests & ground tests) to deal with the spatial variability of pile resistance 25 Static load tests (number and type of piles) 5 dynamic (CAPWAP) for 1 static
  • 27. Estimation of vR using the Brazilian code Correlation factors  (static tests)       4 min, 3 , , )( , )(  mcmeanmc kc RR MinR Variability of pile resistance (vR or R) 645.1 )( ,, kcmeanmc R RR   Reliability index pf = 1-()Probability of failure 22 ER ER       simple closed form normal reliability calculation formula E and R assumed to be normally distributed uncertanty of calculations models (based on SPT test) ? ? ? “ No information about bias of calculation models”  Estimation of β and Pf 26 P ???
  • 28. R density distribution 27 R Obtain R density distribution from: static tests, dynamic tests, dynamic formula, etc.VR Example Resistance (kN) R measured Number of piles mean (kN) COV (%) Static tests 4 3756 12,3 Capwap 74 3295 14,7 Dynamic formula 2506 3231 16,0 Best fit distribution for R Formulations (Freudenthal) involved convolution functions (R and E distribution) to obtain  and Pf Update during and after construction (normal, lognormal, beta, etc.)
  • 29. Christian 2004, Baecher & Christian 2005, Phoon et al 1995, and Phoon et al. 2003): • The uncertainties in geotechnical engineering are largely inductive: starting from limited observations, judgment, knowledge of geology, and statistical reasoning are employed to infer the behavior of a poorly-defined universe. • The probabilistic methods help to relieve the foundation engineer from the ill-suited task of assessing the complex relationship between uncertainties and risks intuitively, while at the same time emphasizing the importance of engineering judgment and experience on the other design aspects that are currently beyond the scope of mathematical analysis. • The geotechnical engineer’s role is not solely to provide judgment on selection of parameters, methods of calculations and resulting safety, but also to take an active part in the evaluation of hazard, vulnerability and risk. • Communication of risk within a transparent and rational framework is necessary in view of increasing interest in code harmonization public involvement in defining acceptable risk levels, and risk-sharing among client, consultant, insurer, and financier. Advantages of employing RBD • The probability theory can provide a formal framework for developing design criteria that would ensure that the probability of "failure" (to refer to exceeding of any prescribed limit state) is acceptably small. 28