Bridging The Research-Practice Gap Through Evidence-Based Management And Systematic Review.
David Denyer and Rob Briner
Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia
Research Integrity - Supervision Enhancement Program, Feb 2016Merilyn Childs
The document provides guidance for supervisors of Higher Degree Research (HDR) candidates on research integrity and ethics. It discusses policies regarding authorship, plagiarism, contract cheating and managing conflicts of interest. It also describes resources available through the university's Research Integrity Office, such as training and advice on handling allegations of misconduct. The document emphasizes supervisors' responsibility for ensuring candidates conduct ethical research and comply with relevant codes of conduct.
This document discusses teaching systematic review skills as a foundation for evidence-based management. It outlines the steps of conducting a systematic review, including focusing the research question, determining study types and data sources, searching literature, applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, extracting and synthesizing data, and critically appraising studies. Examples of students' rapid evidence assessments are provided. Challenges include explaining the rationale to students, time intensity, and resistance from faculty. Student reactions include feeling they are learning independently but also being overwhelmed by what is unknown in the field. Teaching systematic review skills helps students think critically and question assumptions.
Thmep fac ed ppt #13 research in the scholarship of teachingTucsonMedicalCenter
This document provides information on engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). It defines SoTL and distinguishes it from scholarly teaching. Glassick's six elements of scholarship are described for evaluating SoTL projects. Examples of SoTL projects and resources for conducting this type of educational research are provided. Faculty are encouraged to develop research questions about their teaching and students' learning, collect relevant data, and disseminate their findings to contribute to the scholarship of teaching in their discipline.
This document provides information on engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). It defines SoTL and distinguishes it from scholarly teaching. The document outlines steps for SoTL projects, including developing a research question, conducting a literature review, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting results. Resources for SoTL are provided, like the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine library and suggested timelines. Glassick's six criteria for scholarship are described. Examples of SoTL projects in medical education are given to illustrate the approach.
The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence-Based Management Through Case Competition
Presentation by Tina Saksida, UPEI
AOM Annual Meeting, 2015, Vancouver
Bridging The Research-Practice Gap Through Evidence-Based Management And Systematic Review.
David Denyer and Rob Briner
Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia
Research Integrity - Supervision Enhancement Program, Feb 2016Merilyn Childs
The document provides guidance for supervisors of Higher Degree Research (HDR) candidates on research integrity and ethics. It discusses policies regarding authorship, plagiarism, contract cheating and managing conflicts of interest. It also describes resources available through the university's Research Integrity Office, such as training and advice on handling allegations of misconduct. The document emphasizes supervisors' responsibility for ensuring candidates conduct ethical research and comply with relevant codes of conduct.
This document discusses teaching systematic review skills as a foundation for evidence-based management. It outlines the steps of conducting a systematic review, including focusing the research question, determining study types and data sources, searching literature, applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, extracting and synthesizing data, and critically appraising studies. Examples of students' rapid evidence assessments are provided. Challenges include explaining the rationale to students, time intensity, and resistance from faculty. Student reactions include feeling they are learning independently but also being overwhelmed by what is unknown in the field. Teaching systematic review skills helps students think critically and question assumptions.
Thmep fac ed ppt #13 research in the scholarship of teachingTucsonMedicalCenter
This document provides information on engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). It defines SoTL and distinguishes it from scholarly teaching. Glassick's six elements of scholarship are described for evaluating SoTL projects. Examples of SoTL projects and resources for conducting this type of educational research are provided. Faculty are encouraged to develop research questions about their teaching and students' learning, collect relevant data, and disseminate their findings to contribute to the scholarship of teaching in their discipline.
This document provides information on engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). It defines SoTL and distinguishes it from scholarly teaching. The document outlines steps for SoTL projects, including developing a research question, conducting a literature review, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting results. Resources for SoTL are provided, like the Society of Teachers of Family Medicine library and suggested timelines. Glassick's six criteria for scholarship are described. Examples of SoTL projects in medical education are given to illustrate the approach.
The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence-Based Management Through Case Competition
Presentation by Tina Saksida, UPEI
AOM Annual Meeting, 2015, Vancouver
This document provides information on engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). It defines SoTL and discusses how clinical work becomes scholarship. The document outlines the steps in educational research and compares this to evidence-based medicine. Resources for SoTL projects are provided, including relevant groups and individuals. Examples of SoTL projects are given. Glassick's six elements of scholarship are described. Finally, a suggested timeline is provided for developing a scholarly teaching project.
1. The document outlines the progression points process for PhD students at Salford University, which aims to evaluate student progress, provide structure and support, and ensure quality.
2. Key progression points include a learning agreement, annual reports, an interim assessment at 12-15 months, and an internal evaluation at 12 months after the interim assessment. Evaluations assess students' research skills, knowledge, project design/management, and originality.
3. The timeline lays out the progression points for both full-time and part-time PhD students. Forms, guidelines, and tips are provided to help students successfully complete each assessment.
The document provides an outline for evaluating research papers and the skills needed for peer review, including an overview of the peer review process, the roles of authors, editors, and reviewers, guidelines for reviewers in evaluating manuscripts, and how to address reviewers' comments in a revised submission.
This slideshow explains the complete process of writing research proposal for funding agencies. It is useful for the PhD students, researchers, R& D department of company personnel.
The document provides an overview of the doctoral thesis process, outlining the decision to pursue a thesis, what constitutes a thesis, and the various stages of the PhD process including developing a research plan, annual evaluations, publishing research, defending the thesis, and opportunities for international collaborations or industrial mentions.
Progressive focusing and trustworthiness in qualitative research: The enablin...University of Glasgow
* The business and management community increasingly recognises that qualitative research is a ‘messy’, non-linear and often unpredictable undertaking. Yet, a considerable proportion of the qualitative research published in top journals is still presented as the result of a linear, predictable research process, thus wrongly suggesting deductive reasoning. * In this paper, we focus on a particular type of ‘messiness’ where during fieldwork, the research context is revealed to be more complex than anticipated, forcing the researcher to gradually refine/shift their focus to reflect ‘what really matters’. We adopt Stake’s notion of progressive focusing for this gradual approach. * Progressive focusing is well-suited to qualitative research in international business requiring complex iteration between theory and data, and the truthful yet coherent presentation of the research process. We propose that this dual challenge of complexity and trustworthiness may be addressed by using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS). * We present conceptual considerations and guidelines and offer a view on a ‘messy’, non-linear doctoral research project conducted using a progressive focusing approach, to demonstrate how CAQDAS can help to develop and re-negotiate insights from theory and interview data, as well as enhance trustworthiness, transparency and publication potential.
Systematic review international conference slidesvijay kumar
This PowerPoint is about systematic review. The talk was delivered at an International Conference. All videos related to research conferences can be viewed at
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNEUKBUIaQG3wr05Sj38oDA/featured
This document outlines learning activities to develop evidence-based practice (EBP) capabilities. It describes 8 EBP capabilities: Ask, Acquire, Appraise, Aggregate, Apply, Assess, and provides example learning activities for each. The activities include surfacing assumptions, mini-critical appraisal of texts (mini-CATs), evidence maps and gaps, developing implementation plans, and logic models. The goal is to help students identify problems, search and appraise evidence, develop solutions, and evaluate outcomes.
This document provides an overview of the CSSA 506 "Assessment in Higher Education" course offered at Oregon State University in spring 2005. The course is designed to help students learn about assessment techniques and strategies that can be used to evaluate programs and services in student affairs. Over the 10-week course, students will complete group and individual assignments applying assessment skills, including facilitating discussions of assessment methods, designing an assessment proposal, and conducting a final assessment study. The course aims to help students develop competencies in areas like assessment design, data collection and analysis, and communicating findings.
This proposal outlines the key components and guidelines for writing an effective research proposal. It discusses including: an introduction that establishes the problem, significance and purpose; a literature review to define concepts and gaps; hypotheses or research questions linked to a theoretical framework; methodology detailing design, sample, data collection and analysis; and consideration of resources and ethics. The proposal emphasizes developing ideas logically, following guidelines, and avoiding common criticisms like an unfocused or unoriginal project. The goal is to communicate a well-planned, significant study that generates support and demonstrates the researcher's qualifications.
This document discusses different types of literature reviews and how they are used in the research process. It outlines preliminary reviews done early in the research process to scope out what is known, as well as reviews done to develop specific research projects by identifying gaps and developing tools. More formal types of reviews discussed include systematic reviews, narrative reviews, and rapid realist reviews. Several resources for conducting different types of reviews are provided, including the Cochrane Collaboration, EPPI-Centre, and Prospero. Rapid realist reviews are outlined as having 10 specific steps. The document closes by considering the needs of librarians from researchers and ways researchers can improve.
This presentation is intended to novice researchers who are not sure about what they want to research on but want to write a good paper as soon as possible! I used it to insinuate my collleagues into research by making them believe it is very easy!
Research proposals how to prepare and where to submitDave Marcial
This document provides guidance on preparing and submitting research proposals. It discusses the key goals and elements of an effective proposal, including clearly defining the research problem, conducting a literature review, and proposing a methodology. Common mistakes to avoid are being unclear, failing to cite foundational works, and not developing a coherent argument. Tips are provided such as understanding submission guidelines, having a relevant topic, collaborating with others, following templates, proper budgeting and timelines. Various funding agencies and organizations that accept proposals are listed. The document emphasizes starting the proposal process early and revising after rejection.
The document outlines steps for building a research team at the University of Zawia in Libya. It discusses analyzing university rankings methodologies, forming a research group, and conducting a literature review. The research group aims to improve skills, increase publications, solve industry problems, and enhance the university's ranking. A plan is proposed which includes good management, continuous professional development, links to other groups, and a list of activities. The goal is to effectively contribute to higher education through improved research.
This document provides information about Macquarie University's 2-year Research Training Pathway program, which includes a BPhil/MRes option for domestic students and an MRes option for international students. The program is designed to provide structured research training and prepare students for progression to a PhD. It involves 2 years of coursework and research skills development, culminating in a 20,000-word thesis. Scholarships are available to support students throughout the program. Successful completion allows automatic entry to a PhD at Macquarie.
This document provides information on engaging in the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL). It defines SoTL and discusses how clinical work becomes scholarship. The document outlines the steps in educational research and compares this to evidence-based medicine. Resources for SoTL projects are provided, including relevant groups and individuals. Examples of SoTL projects are given. Glassick's six elements of scholarship are described. Finally, a suggested timeline is provided for developing a scholarly teaching project.
1. The document outlines the progression points process for PhD students at Salford University, which aims to evaluate student progress, provide structure and support, and ensure quality.
2. Key progression points include a learning agreement, annual reports, an interim assessment at 12-15 months, and an internal evaluation at 12 months after the interim assessment. Evaluations assess students' research skills, knowledge, project design/management, and originality.
3. The timeline lays out the progression points for both full-time and part-time PhD students. Forms, guidelines, and tips are provided to help students successfully complete each assessment.
The document provides an outline for evaluating research papers and the skills needed for peer review, including an overview of the peer review process, the roles of authors, editors, and reviewers, guidelines for reviewers in evaluating manuscripts, and how to address reviewers' comments in a revised submission.
This slideshow explains the complete process of writing research proposal for funding agencies. It is useful for the PhD students, researchers, R& D department of company personnel.
The document provides an overview of the doctoral thesis process, outlining the decision to pursue a thesis, what constitutes a thesis, and the various stages of the PhD process including developing a research plan, annual evaluations, publishing research, defending the thesis, and opportunities for international collaborations or industrial mentions.
Progressive focusing and trustworthiness in qualitative research: The enablin...University of Glasgow
* The business and management community increasingly recognises that qualitative research is a ‘messy’, non-linear and often unpredictable undertaking. Yet, a considerable proportion of the qualitative research published in top journals is still presented as the result of a linear, predictable research process, thus wrongly suggesting deductive reasoning. * In this paper, we focus on a particular type of ‘messiness’ where during fieldwork, the research context is revealed to be more complex than anticipated, forcing the researcher to gradually refine/shift their focus to reflect ‘what really matters’. We adopt Stake’s notion of progressive focusing for this gradual approach. * Progressive focusing is well-suited to qualitative research in international business requiring complex iteration between theory and data, and the truthful yet coherent presentation of the research process. We propose that this dual challenge of complexity and trustworthiness may be addressed by using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS). * We present conceptual considerations and guidelines and offer a view on a ‘messy’, non-linear doctoral research project conducted using a progressive focusing approach, to demonstrate how CAQDAS can help to develop and re-negotiate insights from theory and interview data, as well as enhance trustworthiness, transparency and publication potential.
Systematic review international conference slidesvijay kumar
This PowerPoint is about systematic review. The talk was delivered at an International Conference. All videos related to research conferences can be viewed at
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNEUKBUIaQG3wr05Sj38oDA/featured
This document outlines learning activities to develop evidence-based practice (EBP) capabilities. It describes 8 EBP capabilities: Ask, Acquire, Appraise, Aggregate, Apply, Assess, and provides example learning activities for each. The activities include surfacing assumptions, mini-critical appraisal of texts (mini-CATs), evidence maps and gaps, developing implementation plans, and logic models. The goal is to help students identify problems, search and appraise evidence, develop solutions, and evaluate outcomes.
This document provides an overview of the CSSA 506 "Assessment in Higher Education" course offered at Oregon State University in spring 2005. The course is designed to help students learn about assessment techniques and strategies that can be used to evaluate programs and services in student affairs. Over the 10-week course, students will complete group and individual assignments applying assessment skills, including facilitating discussions of assessment methods, designing an assessment proposal, and conducting a final assessment study. The course aims to help students develop competencies in areas like assessment design, data collection and analysis, and communicating findings.
This proposal outlines the key components and guidelines for writing an effective research proposal. It discusses including: an introduction that establishes the problem, significance and purpose; a literature review to define concepts and gaps; hypotheses or research questions linked to a theoretical framework; methodology detailing design, sample, data collection and analysis; and consideration of resources and ethics. The proposal emphasizes developing ideas logically, following guidelines, and avoiding common criticisms like an unfocused or unoriginal project. The goal is to communicate a well-planned, significant study that generates support and demonstrates the researcher's qualifications.
This document discusses different types of literature reviews and how they are used in the research process. It outlines preliminary reviews done early in the research process to scope out what is known, as well as reviews done to develop specific research projects by identifying gaps and developing tools. More formal types of reviews discussed include systematic reviews, narrative reviews, and rapid realist reviews. Several resources for conducting different types of reviews are provided, including the Cochrane Collaboration, EPPI-Centre, and Prospero. Rapid realist reviews are outlined as having 10 specific steps. The document closes by considering the needs of librarians from researchers and ways researchers can improve.
This presentation is intended to novice researchers who are not sure about what they want to research on but want to write a good paper as soon as possible! I used it to insinuate my collleagues into research by making them believe it is very easy!
Research proposals how to prepare and where to submitDave Marcial
This document provides guidance on preparing and submitting research proposals. It discusses the key goals and elements of an effective proposal, including clearly defining the research problem, conducting a literature review, and proposing a methodology. Common mistakes to avoid are being unclear, failing to cite foundational works, and not developing a coherent argument. Tips are provided such as understanding submission guidelines, having a relevant topic, collaborating with others, following templates, proper budgeting and timelines. Various funding agencies and organizations that accept proposals are listed. The document emphasizes starting the proposal process early and revising after rejection.
The document outlines steps for building a research team at the University of Zawia in Libya. It discusses analyzing university rankings methodologies, forming a research group, and conducting a literature review. The research group aims to improve skills, increase publications, solve industry problems, and enhance the university's ranking. A plan is proposed which includes good management, continuous professional development, links to other groups, and a list of activities. The goal is to effectively contribute to higher education through improved research.
This document provides information about Macquarie University's 2-year Research Training Pathway program, which includes a BPhil/MRes option for domestic students and an MRes option for international students. The program is designed to provide structured research training and prepare students for progression to a PhD. It involves 2 years of coursework and research skills development, culminating in a 20,000-word thesis. Scholarships are available to support students throughout the program. Successful completion allows automatic entry to a PhD at Macquarie.
This presentation provides an overview of one way of thinking about evidence, with examples. It was developed to assist academics seeking to earn credit as a way of achieving the annual supervision enhancement update at MQ.
This slide was prepared for an HDR Supervision update @ Sociology at Macquarie University. This overview has two parts:
1. Proposed changes to the HDR Supervision Enhancement
Program (2017)
2. Awareness raising about the Supervisor's Toolkit (2016)
This document summarizes a presentation given by Dr. Merilyn Childs about redesigning a Higher Degree Research (HDR) Supervision Enhancement Program from a training model to a model focused on lifelong learning. The presentation discusses limitations of the traditional training approach and proposes a more balanced approach incorporating self-directed, interest-driven learning and redesigning learning policies and practices. The goal is to better connect strategies for HDR supervisor development to theories of institutional change and digital literacies needed in today's academic environment. Feedback so far on the redesign has been positive and the program aims to further progress and evaluate changes in 2017.
This document summarizes a workshop about proposed changes to Macquarie University's HDR Supervision Enhancement Program in 2017 and improving HDR supervision through action planning. Key points include:
1. Registration for the 2017 workshop will be through the HRIS system and training will be included in HROnline.
2. The initial supervision program will be redesigned to be problem-based and two new modules on orientation for adjunct supervisors and cultural competence will be developed.
3. An action planning toolkit for supervisors includes early warning signs of issues and a discussion paper on complaints about post-graduate supervision. Action planning helps MRes and PhD candidates.
Supervision Enhancement Program workshop facilitated by A/P Merilyn Childs, Convenor Supervision Enhancement Program and A/P Bridget Mabbutt, MRes Director (FSE)
This slide presentation is a conversational trigger used to discuss the inclusion of an evidencing practices approach to the annual supervision update at MQ. A working example was given where participants edit their digital profile that exists within the MQSR (registration portal), as this activity is one example of evidence that could be used. Many other examples are given via the embedded Google form.
1. The document outlines changes to the centralized Higher Degree Research (HDR) supervision program at a university.
2. A new distributed leadership model has been created that offers supervisors more choice and options for supervision professional development. This includes online and face-to-face workshops as well as opportunities for faculties to develop their own accredited programs.
3. The role of the Convenor is shifting from gatekeeper to consultant and partner who assists with and certifies other supervision enhancement programs.
This document provides an introduction to Higher Degree Research (HDR) programs at Macquarie University. It defines HDR as the highest academic qualification involving systematic and critical understanding of a field through specialized research skills. The goals of HDR degrees like Doctorates and Research Masters are outlined according to the Australian Qualifications Framework. Key administration roles and committees related to HDR are listed, along with the responsibilities of the Dean HDR. Guidance on the supervision process and support available to HDR students is also provided.
Presentation for the first class of the course "Language Course Design" at the Advanced Graduate Deploma in Teaching English as a Foreign Language at Universidad Simon Bolivar, Caracas, Venezuela.
Dr Jen Rowland facilitated a "Supervising a thesis by publication" workshop for the Faculty of Law at Macquarie University on 10 August 2016 jen.rowland@mq.edu.au
The document provides an overview of Macquarie University's Bachelor of Philosophy/Master of Research (BPhil/MRes) program. It discusses the components and requirements of the BPhil in Year 1 and the MRes in Year 2. The MRes is a structured research training program consisting of coursework and a 20,000 word thesis. Successful completion of the MRes satisfies the entry requirements for PhD study and allows graduates to articulate directly into a PhD program. The document gives guidance on scoping an appropriate research project for the MRes that can provide a foundation for future PhD work.
This document provides information about Macquarie University's joint supervision programs, including cotutelle and joint PhD programs. It notes that there are currently 89 candidates enrolled in these programs from over 30 partner countries, primarily in Europe and China. The programs aim to prepare world-ready research candidates and are part of the university's 2015-2024 strategic research framework. The majority of candidates are in the fields of science and engineering. The document provides details on program management systems, the application process, funding sources, and contact information for the Higher Degree Research Office.
This document discusses research integrity issues that may arise for HDR supervisors. It provides an overview of Macquarie University's research integrity policies and guidelines. It also describes some common cases of academic misconduct that have involved HDR candidates, such as plagiarism, contract cheating, and disputes around authorship. The document encourages supervisors to discuss these issues proactively with their candidates to promote responsible research conduct.
The document discusses various types of support available to HDR (Higher Degree Research) students at Macquarie University. It covers infrastructure support provided by the University as well as project support through funding schemes. It also addresses completion rates that factor into government funding, intellectual property rights and policies, and the benefits to students of assigning intellectual property rights to the University.
The document discusses Macquarie University's HDR thesis examination process. It explains that PhD theses require examination by 3 external examiners while MPhil theses require 2. Examiners submit written reports and may recommend awarding the degree, awarding with corrections, revision and resubmission, or not awarding. Supervisors nominate examiners in consultation with students. Examiners should be significant figures in the field but not personally close to the student or supervisors. The examination process involves examiner reports, faculty responses, consideration by committees, and potential revisions by the student.
The document provides an overview of the PhD process at UCD School of Mathematical Sciences. It discusses the standards required for a PhD degree including independence, originality, contribution to knowledge, and work suitable for publication. It outlines the research process, emphasizing the importance of planning, execution, analysis, and reporting. It also discusses the responsibilities of students and supervisors, criteria for assessing PhD theses, authorship, and responsible research conduct. Throughout it emphasizes that a PhD requires solid, independent work to advance understanding in a research area.
Streamlining Research with Nursing Expertise and Developing a Personal Resear...Ryan Michael Oducado
This document discusses developing a personal research agenda. It emphasizes that conducting research based on one's expertise ensures high-quality, credible contributions. It outlines steps to take such as identifying a research problem and area of interest, reviewing relevant literature, considering ethical issues, and developing innovative projects. Developing a clear research agenda improves focus, allows one to become an expert, and enables meaningful knowledge contributions. The agenda should outline future research priorities and activities to address an overarching problem or interest area.
This document provides guidance on writing a research proposal, including strategies and ethical considerations. It outlines formats for qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods proposals with examples. It discusses designing proposal sections, writing techniques like writing as thinking, readability, voice and tense. It also covers anticipating and addressing ethical issues that may arise prior to beginning a study, during data collection, analysis, and when reporting/sharing results. The overall document offers comprehensive advice for developing a strong research proposal.
This document outlines a course on business research methodology. The course aims to provide students with basic knowledge of research concepts and theories and enable them to acquire skills for conducting practical business research exercises. Key learning objectives include understanding scientific research methods in a business context, planning and conducting a business research project by making decisions on elements of the research process, analytical techniques, and presenting results. The course covers topics such as research design, measurement, sampling, data collection and analysis, and report writing to equip students with the ability to apply research methodology knowledge and skills after graduation.
OBJECTIVES:
To understand the importance of publication and its challenges.
To increase the visibility and accessibility of published papers.
To increase the chance of getting publications cited.
To disseminate the publication by using “Research Tools” effectively.
To increase the chance of research collaboration.
UNIT-I: INTRODUCTION
Nature and importance of research - aims, objective, principles and problems - selection of research problem - survey of scientific literature - primary and secondary sources - citation index for scientific papers and journals - patents.
This document provides an overview of ethics in engineering research. It discusses key concepts like ethics versus morals, voluntary participation and informed consent, avoiding harm, privacy and confidentiality. Guidelines from organizations like ESRC and Elsevier on research integrity are summarized. Principles of engineering research ethics around topics like deception, risks/benefits, covert research, data issues, authorship disputes and intellectual property rights are also outlined. The goal is to introduce students to applying ethical standards in their own research.
This document provides an overview of ethics in engineering research. It discusses key concepts like ethics versus morals, voluntary participation and informed consent, avoiding harm, privacy and confidentiality. Guidelines from organizations like ESRC and Elsevier on research integrity are summarized. Principles of engineering research ethics around topics like deception, risks/benefits, covert research, data issues, authorship disputes and intellectual property rights are also outlined. The goal is to introduce students to applying ethical standards in their own research.
1) The document provides guidance on writing a PhD research proposal, including what content to include and stylistic rules to follow.
2) Key elements to include are a title, abstract, background on existing research, hypothesis, objectives, methodology, dissemination plan, supervisory support, and timeline.
3) Proposals should be clear, objective, and realistic. Justify why the research is important and how it will benefit society. Follow formatting guidelines and deadlines.
Effective research paper writing for scientific write-up, Btech+Mtech.pptxMethusharma
Crafting an effective research paper requires a combination of meticulous planning, rigorous analysis, and clear communication. This process begins with thorough research and a deep understanding of the subject matter. Before diving into writing, it's essential to formulate a clear research question or hypothesis and outline the structure of the paper.
A well-written research paper typically follows a standard format, including an abstract, introduction, literature review, methodology, results, discussion, and conclusion. Each section serves a specific purpose, guiding the reader through the study's objectives, methodology, findings, and implications.
In the introduction, provide background information on the topic and highlight the significance of the research. Clearly state the research question or hypothesis and outline the paper's structure. The literature review should critically evaluate existing research on the topic, identifying gaps and establishing the context for the study.
The methodology section should detail the research design, data collection methods, and analysis techniques used. It's crucial to provide enough detail for the study to be reproducible by other researchers. Present the results objectively, using tables, figures, and statistics to support your findings.
In the discussion section, interpret the results in the context of the research question and existing literature. Address any limitations of the study and propose areas for future research. Finally, summarize the key findings and their implications in the conclusion.
Throughout the writing process, maintain clarity, coherence, and precision in your language. Use appropriate citation styles to acknowledge sources and avoid plagiarism. Revision is a critical step in the writing process, so be prepared to revise and edit your paper multiple times to ensure clarity, accuracy, and coherence.
By following these guidelines and paying attention to detail, you can produce a research paper that effectively communicates your findings and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in your field.
the presentation on English research paper writing has shed light on the intricacies of this essential academic and professional endeavor. We've explored the fundamental components of research papers, from the definition and purpose of research papers to the critical stages of selecting a research topic, conducting a literature review, choosing research methods, and structuring the paper. The pitfalls and best practices associated with research paper writing have been highlighted, emphasizing the need to steer clear of common mistakes like plagiarism, poor structure, and unclear language.
Furthermore, the presentation delved into the ethical considerations, the importance of responsible data citation, and the value of revision and editing in refining the quality of research papers. Through a real-life case study, we witnessed the tangible impact that well-crafted research papers can have on the advancement of knowledge and practical solutions in various fields. The significance of the abstract as a concise gateway to research papers was also explored, stressing its role in assisting readers and reviewers in quickly grasping the essence of a study. We discussed the key attributes of an effective abstract, from conciseness to clarity and audience-tailoring, recognizing its pivotal role in shaping the perception of one's research.
In the realm of English research paper writing, the mastery of these principles and practices is not only a testament to one's research skills but also an avenue to contribute meaningfully to academic and professional discourse. As researchers, students, and professionals, the knowledge and insights gained from this presentation empower us to navigate the complex terrain of research paper writing with precision, impact, and integrity, thereby making valuable contributions to our respective fields and the broader world of academia and practice. English research paper is not merely a formality but a crucial entry point for readers into the depth and significance of your study. Crafting a clear, concise, and audience-focused abstract can significantly impact the visibility and accessibility of your research, making it a valuable skill for researchers in both academic and professional contexts. A well-written abstract can make a substantial difference in the visibility and accessibility of your research. Whether it's an academic paper, a conference presentation, or a professional report, the abstract is often the first thing readers or reviewers encounter. Its quality can determine whether your work is explored further.
In the world of English research paper writing, mastering the art of creating a compelling abstract is a skill that can enhance your academic and professional impact.
Use this description to introduce the concept and significance of the abstract section of your presentation on English research paper writing. This sets the stage for a more detailed discussion of abstracts in the subsequent slides. Thank you
This document provides guidance on how to write a dissertation for a post-graduate degree. It discusses what a dissertation is, why it is important, and the requirements and process for completing one. Some key points covered include:
- A dissertation is an in-depth study of a particular topic that contributes new knowledge to the field. It involves planning, executing, evaluating, writing, and reporting a scientific project.
- Completing a dissertation teaches important research skills like developing a research methodology, stimulating interest in research, and critically appraising medical literature.
- Requirements include having a competent guide, adequate time, necessary equipment and materials, and following ethical guidelines.
- The process involves selecting a topic,
Scientific research and publication walk throughRoshni Mehta
Humble effort made in the form of this presentation will assist in the accomplishment of exploratory as well as result-oriented research studies. I shall feel amply rewarded if this slides proves helpful in the development of genuine research studies.
As a scientist, we must write, and, as an experimentalist, writing while you work strengthens your research. Writing a paper can be an integral part of observational science. Our manuscript can even be a blueprint for our experiments.
Togar M. Simatupang gave a presentation on conducting research and getting work published. He discussed the process of developing research ideas, choosing appropriate research methods, structuring manuscripts, and navigating the publication process. He emphasized that publishing papers regularly is important for academic careers. The presentation outlined key steps like selecting target journals, responding to peer reviews, and improving manuscripts based on feedback in order to get work published.
The document outlines the key components of writing a research protocol, including defining research, the purpose of a protocol, and the typical parts of a protocol. It discusses that a protocol should clarify the research question, compile existing knowledge, form a hypothesis and objectives. The typical parts are an introduction with the problem and background, methodology covering the research design and data collection/analysis, and ethical considerations. It provides guidance on writing each section, such as making the introduction concise and specific, clearly linking objectives to the research problem, and describing the study design and statistical analysis plan in the methodology.
Communication and utilisation of research findingssudhashivakumar
This document discusses communication and utilization of research findings. It defines communication of research findings as interpreting complex results so nonexperts can understand. The purposes of communication include bridging clinical practice and research, promoting learning, and improving quality of care. Key steps outlined are selecting the audience and method, avoiding jargon, and effective writing. Common methods of communication are written reports, oral reports, and poster presentations. Barriers to research utilization include issues related to nurses, organizations, research, and communication. Strategies to facilitate use include developing research departments, education programs, and open communication.
Similar to Research Integrity - Supervision Enhancement Program, Feb 2016 (20)
This presentation is part of the training pathway for Macquarie University staff thinking about applying an Associate Fellowship in the Higher Degree Research Supervision Fellowship program
'HDR55 Build Evidence of Good Practice' is a foundation workshop in the application process for a Macquarie University HDR Supervision Associate Fellowship.
The document summarizes changes to Macquarie University's HDR supervision orientation program and policy. It notes that in 2018, new Macquarie staff will complete a mandatory online orientation module covering HDR supervision best practices. It also introduces a new voluntary HDR Fellowship Program to recognize excellence in supervision, especially for early career researchers. Finally, it reviews updated categories of supervisors under the new HDR supervision policy.
This presentation provides an overview of the architecture of the Macquarie University HDR Supervision Framework, and related HDR Supervision Fellowship Program, to be introduced during 2018.
I included in this presentation a detailed table - I wouldn't normally do this, not good use of a ppt. But I included it in this slideshare version so that anyone who is interested can have an explore.
Macquarie University is introducing a new approach to the continuous professional development of HDR Supervisors. It is based on professional recognition, a new approach to criteria for promotion, and a Fellowship Scheme. This presentation provides an overview of the changes being made to shift to a 'new normal' of HDR supervisor development.
The document outlines plans to improve Macquarie University's HDR Supervision Enhancement Program. It discusses expanding orientation pathways and developing a continuing professional development program including workshops and an HDR Supervision Fellowship Scheme. The program aims to provide outstanding supervisory expertise through recognition of supervision experience in promotions policies and integrating supervision training records in HR systems. Revising policy and procedures aims to clarify supervisor roles and embed cultural competence training. The presentation seeks faculty collaboration to develop bespoke workshops and grow ownership of quality supervision.
More from Merilyn Childs @ Macquarie University (6)
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
Walmart Business+ and Spark Good for Nonprofits.pdfTechSoup
"Learn about all the ways Walmart supports nonprofit organizations.
You will hear from Liz Willett, the Head of Nonprofits, and hear about what Walmart is doing to help nonprofits, including Walmart Business and Spark Good. Walmart Business+ is a new offer for nonprofits that offers discounts and also streamlines nonprofits order and expense tracking, saving time and money.
The webinar may also give some examples on how nonprofits can best leverage Walmart Business+.
The event will cover the following::
Walmart Business + (https://business.walmart.com/plus) is a new shopping experience for nonprofits, schools, and local business customers that connects an exclusive online shopping experience to stores. Benefits include free delivery and shipping, a 'Spend Analytics” feature, special discounts, deals and tax-exempt shopping.
Special TechSoup offer for a free 180 days membership, and up to $150 in discounts on eligible orders.
Spark Good (walmart.com/sparkgood) is a charitable platform that enables nonprofits to receive donations directly from customers and associates.
Answers about how you can do more with Walmart!"
This presentation includes basic of PCOS their pathology and treatment and also Ayurveda correlation of PCOS and Ayurvedic line of treatment mentioned in classics.
LAND USE LAND COVER AND NDVI OF MIRZAPUR DISTRICT, UPRAHUL
This Dissertation explores the particular circumstances of Mirzapur, a region located in the
core of India. Mirzapur, with its varied terrains and abundant biodiversity, offers an optimal
environment for investigating the changes in vegetation cover dynamics. Our study utilizes
advanced technologies such as GIS (Geographic Information Systems) and Remote sensing to
analyze the transformations that have taken place over the course of a decade.
The complex relationship between human activities and the environment has been the focus
of extensive research and worry. As the global community grapples with swift urbanization,
population expansion, and economic progress, the effects on natural ecosystems are becoming
more evident. A crucial element of this impact is the alteration of vegetation cover, which plays a
significant role in maintaining the ecological equilibrium of our planet.Land serves as the foundation for all human activities and provides the necessary materials for
these activities. As the most crucial natural resource, its utilization by humans results in different
'Land uses,' which are determined by both human activities and the physical characteristics of the
land.
The utilization of land is impacted by human needs and environmental factors. In countries
like India, rapid population growth and the emphasis on extensive resource exploitation can lead
to significant land degradation, adversely affecting the region's land cover.
Therefore, human intervention has significantly influenced land use patterns over many
centuries, evolving its structure over time and space. In the present era, these changes have
accelerated due to factors such as agriculture and urbanization. Information regarding land use and
cover is essential for various planning and management tasks related to the Earth's surface,
providing crucial environmental data for scientific, resource management, policy purposes, and
diverse human activities.
Accurate understanding of land use and cover is imperative for the development planning
of any area. Consequently, a wide range of professionals, including earth system scientists, land
and water managers, and urban planners, are interested in obtaining data on land use and cover
changes, conversion trends, and other related patterns. The spatial dimensions of land use and
cover support policymakers and scientists in making well-informed decisions, as alterations in
these patterns indicate shifts in economic and social conditions. Monitoring such changes with the
help of Advanced technologies like Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems is
crucial for coordinated efforts across different administrative levels. Advanced technologies like
Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems
9
Changes in vegetation cover refer to variations in the distribution, composition, and overall
structure of plant communities across different temporal and spatial scales. These changes can
occur natural.
How to Manage Your Lost Opportunities in Odoo 17 CRMCeline George
Odoo 17 CRM allows us to track why we lose sales opportunities with "Lost Reasons." This helps analyze our sales process and identify areas for improvement. Here's how to configure lost reasons in Odoo 17 CRM
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
How to Fix the Import Error in the Odoo 17Celine George
An import error occurs when a program fails to import a module or library, disrupting its execution. In languages like Python, this issue arises when the specified module cannot be found or accessed, hindering the program's functionality. Resolving import errors is crucial for maintaining smooth software operation and uninterrupted development processes.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
বাংলাদেশের অর্থনৈতিক সমীক্ষা ২০২৪ [Bangladesh Economic Review 2024 Bangla.pdf] কম্পিউটার , ট্যাব ও স্মার্ট ফোন ভার্সন সহ সম্পূর্ণ বাংলা ই-বুক বা pdf বই " সুচিপত্র ...বুকমার্ক মেনু 🔖 ও হাইপার লিংক মেনু 📝👆 যুক্ত ..
আমাদের সবার জন্য খুব খুব গুরুত্বপূর্ণ একটি বই ..বিসিএস, ব্যাংক, ইউনিভার্সিটি ভর্তি ও যে কোন প্রতিযোগিতা মূলক পরীক্ষার জন্য এর খুব ইম্পরট্যান্ট একটি বিষয় ...তাছাড়া বাংলাদেশের সাম্প্রতিক যে কোন ডাটা বা তথ্য এই বইতে পাবেন ...
তাই একজন নাগরিক হিসাবে এই তথ্য গুলো আপনার জানা প্রয়োজন ...।
বিসিএস ও ব্যাংক এর লিখিত পরীক্ষা ...+এছাড়া মাধ্যমিক ও উচ্চমাধ্যমিকের স্টুডেন্টদের জন্য অনেক কাজে আসবে ...
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
Film vocab for eal 3 students: Australia the movie
Research Integrity - Supervision Enhancement Program, Feb 2016
1. A GUIDE FOR HDR SUPERVISORS
Research Integrity
Dr Ben Pitcher
Research Integrity Officer
ben.pitcher@mq.edu.au
2. Today’s session
2RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY I RESEARCH OFFICE
• An introduction to the Research Integrity Office
• A quick look at policy and guidelines
• Some examples of cases involving HDR candidates
and supervisors
• Suggestions for good research practice based on
our experiences
• Discussion of your experiences with research
integrity
3. What would you do?
3RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY I RESEARCH OFFICE
• Michael is supervising a candidate who is conducting
research abroad.
• The candidate is not a native English speaker and has
needed extensive assistance with writing in the past.
• The candidate is sending results and draft chapters back to
Michael.
• Michael notices that the standard of writing has improved
dramatically.
• What should Michael do?
4. The Research Integrity Team
4
RESEARCH INTEGRITY OFFICE (BEN PITCHER & MARGAUX LE GUAY):
Research.Integrity@mq.edu.au
X 1031
DIRECTOR, RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY (KANDY WHITE):
Karolyn.White@mq.edu.au
X 7854
PROF LESLEY HUGHES,
PRO-VICE CHANCELLOR (RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND DEVELOPMENT)
WEB:
WWW.RESEARCH.MQ.EDU.AU/RESEARCH_INTEGRITY
RESEARCH OFFICE I RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY
5. What do we do?
5
EDUCATION:
• For all research staff and students
• Web-based content
• Face-to-face sessions
• Supervisor training
INVESTIGATION:
• Preliminary investigation of allegations
• Coordinate further investigation
• Report to the DVCR
The Research Integrity Team
RESEARCH OFFICE I RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY
7. The Australian Code
7
FOR THE RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT OF RESEARCH
• Endorsed by NHMRC, ARC and
Universities Australia in 2007
• Why is it important?
Promote research integrity
Describes best practice in
research for researchers and
institutions
Compliance is a requisite for
NHMRC and ARC funding
RESEARCH OFFICE I RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY
8. The Macquarie Code
8
Available on Policy Central
http://mq.edu.au/policy/category.html#research
MAIN TOPICS ADDRESSED:
• General principles of responsible research
• Management of research data and primary materials
• Supervision of research trainees
• Publication and dissemination of research findings
• Authorship
• Peer Review
• Conflicts of Interest
• Collaborative research across institutions
FOR THE RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT OF RESEARCH
RESEARCH OFFICE I RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY
9. Research Misconduct
9
BREACHES:
Unintentional failures to comply with principles or specific policies
RESEARCH MISCONDUCT:
Breaches of principles or policies that are intentional, reckless or grossly
& persistently negligent, e.g.
• Fabrication or falsification of data or results
• Plagiarism
• Failure to manage risks to humans, animals or environment or obtain
& maintain appropriate ethical approval
• Misleading ascription of authorship
• Non-disclosure of conflicts of interest
AND BREACHES OF THE CODE
RESEARCH OFFICE I RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY
10. Research Integrity
10RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY I RESEARCH OFFICE
THE MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY CODE FOR THE
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT OF RESEARCH
• Sets out the standards expected of our researchers
• http://mq.edu.au/policy/category.html#research
• DOES NOT differentiate between HDR candidates and staff
HDR CANDIDATES
The Changing PhD, Discussion Paper, March 2013, The Group of Eight
11. HDR Candidates as Researchers
11RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY I RESEARCH OFFICE
DO THE PRIORITIES OF CANDIDATES AND THE
UNIVERSITY MESH?
• The value of HDR research vs training
WHAT COULD GO WRONG?
• Plagiarism
• Fabrication / falsification
• Compliance with legislation / policy
• Contract cheating…
14. Authorship
14
• Five cases involving authorship in 18 months
• All cases involve research students
• Two cases where HDR candidates were removed from papers
• Two cases where supervisors allegedly used candidate’s work without
appropriate attribution
RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY I RESEARCH OFFICE
15. To be an author you must make a substantial contribution to a combination of:
1. Conceiving or designing the project,
2. Analysing and interpreting the data,
3. Writing or critically revising the intellectual content of the output.
AND
• Give final agreement to the version to be published
Authorship
15
• Getting funding, collecting data, giving technical assistance or
materials don’t automatically count for authorship
• People who don’t qualify as authors should be acknowledged
• Discuss authorship and have a written record of
discussions/agreements
RESEARCH OFFICE I RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY
16. Contract cheating
16RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY I RESEARCH OFFICE
WHAT IS IT?
• Contracting others to complete a piece of academic work
• Typically a bespoke piece of writing on a particular topic,
but may be other work, e.g. source code
• Essay mills (custom writing services - “ghostwriting”)
• Auction sites (tendering for services)
• Essay banks (pre-written essays)
WHO DOES IT?
• Largely seen as a problem amongst undergraduate students
• Emerging as a problem amongst postgraduates
• Very rare amongst research staff
17. Contract cheating
17
• Three recent cases at Macquarie under investigation
• Two cases - Allegations of candidates using professional writers via online
services
• “Editorial services” or “writing coaches”
• One case - Reports of PhD candidates and/or supervisors employing
postdocs to write papers for inclusion in a thesis
• Detected by: changes in writing style, metadata in files, tipoffs
RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY I RESEARCH OFFICE
19. Managing your research group
19
LESSONS LEARNED FROM RETRACTIONS
1. Expect errors to occur
2. Have redundancy in your research team
3. Own your errors
4. Build checks into your routine
5. Plan blocks of research time
6. Know your competencies
7. Create an open culture
8. Lead investigators (supervisors) must assume full responsibility
9. If something doesn’t make sense - ask about it
RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY I RESEARCH OFFICE
Kullgren & Carter (2015) Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology. 3:352-357
21. Tips for supervisors
21
• Ensure you and your candidate are familiar with the Macquarie Code
• Discuss data management and keep a copy of the data when they leave
• Talk about authorship and keep records of discussions
• Check they understand plagiarism
• Train candidates in peer review
• Discuss conflicts of interest and how to manage them
• Meet regularly with your candidates
• If things aren’t going well raise it in the Progress Reports
• Seek advice…
RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY I RESEARCH OFFICE
22. Using Professional Editors
22
GUIDELINES FOR EDITING RESEARCH THESES
• Agreement by the Institute of Professional Editors (IPEd) and the Deans and
Directors of Graduate Studies (DDoGS)
• http://iped-editors.org/About_editing/Editing_theses.aspx
• Supervisors will provide editorial advice relating to matters of substance
and structure; language (including matters of clarity, voice and tone,
grammar, spelling and punctuation, specialised and foreign material); and
use of illustrations and tables. They may also assist with copyediting and
proofreading.
RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY I RESEARCH OFFICE
23. Using Professional Editors
23
GUIDELINES FOR EDITING RESEARCH THESES
• Professional editing should be restricted to copyediting and proofreading
• May draw attention to problems in matters of substance and structure, but should not
provide solutions
• If used in any form, the name of the editor and a brief description of the service rendered,
should be included as part of the list of acknowledgements.
• Copyediting: grammar, spelling, capitalisation, punctuation, hyphenation and overall
correctness and consistency.
• Proofreading: verification of copy, integrity check, proofing, conformity with house style,
format
RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY I RESEARCH OFFICE
24. Research Integrity Advisors
24
• Associate Deans of Higher Degree Research and Research
• RIAs can provide advice on good research practice
Talk about issues before they become problems
• RIAs also provide advice about reporting breaches
• If researchers have concerns:
Talk to any RIA, not just in their faculty
Talk in hypotheticals
Get their help and advice in preparing a complaint
RESEARCH OFFICE I RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY
25. Contact us
25
RESEARCH INTEGRITY OFFICE (BEN PITCHER & MARGAUX LE GUAY):
Research.Integrity@mq.edu.au
X 1031
DIRECTOR, RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY (KANDY WHITE):
Karolyn.White@mq.edu.au
X 7854
WEB:
WWW.RESEARCH.MQ.EDU.AU/RESEARCH_INTEGRITY
OR contact a Research Integrity Advisor
THE RESEARCH INTEGRITY TEAM
RESEARCH OFFICE I RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY