Research in Hospital
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•596 views
This document provides an introduction to research. It discusses why research is important, including gaining new knowledge to improve patient care and making evidence-based decisions. It outlines the typical steps in a research process, including identifying a research area and question, developing a research design with a study population and sampling plan, collecting and analyzing data, and publishing and sharing findings. It also describes different types of research such as experimental, prevalence, cross-sectional, and correlational studies. The document encourages curiosity as the essence of research and offers suggestions for how to start the research process.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
How to use medical literature
This document provides guidance for clinicians on critically evaluating new medical studies and literature. It outlines key questions to consider in order to determine if a study's findings are likely to be true, important, and applicable to patients. Some areas to focus on include the study design, methods, results, conclusions, relevance and applicability of the population and time period studied. Considering these factors can help clinicians decide if new research is worth incorporating into their practice. The document emphasizes analyzing new findings in the context of existing knowledge.
PICO question
This document discusses developing PICO questions to help formulate clinical questions. It provides background on distinguishing background and foreground questions. The PICO framework is introduced as a method to structure clinical questions into four components: P (patient/population), I (intervention), C (comparison), and O (outcome). Examples are provided to demonstrate how to formulate a PICO question from a clinical scenario. The question types that can be addressed through PICO questions are also outlined.
Evidence Based Practice
This document outlines the steps of the evidence-based medicine process which includes assessing the patient, asking a question, acquiring resources, appraising the evidence, and applying to the patient. It discusses how to formulate a well-built clinical question using PICO(TT) and describes the different types of study designs and evidence hierarchies. Guidelines are provided for evaluating the quality of individual studies, such as using the FRISBE checklist, and for critically appraising systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Critically appraise evidence based findings
The document discusses critical appraisal of evidence-based findings. It defines critical appraisal as assessing the strength and quality of scientific evidence to evaluate its applicability to healthcare decision making. Strength of evidence depends on factors like quality, quantity, and consistency of research. Evidence is ranked in levels based on research design, with systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials having the highest levels of evidence. Evaluating the quality and applicability of evidence involves assessing the validity of results and whether results can be applied to target populations. Statistical evaluation through effect sizes can also aid in appraising evidence.
Evidence based nursing practice
Evidence based nursing practice involves making clinical decisions using the best available research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences. However, 30-45% of patients do not receive care according to scientific evidence, and 20-25% of care provided is potentially harmful. Evidence based nursing practice solves problems through four steps: identifying issues, performing literature searches, evaluating research evidence, and selecting interventions justified by evidence. Several conceptual models can help understand contextual factors influencing knowledge translation, including the Stetler model, Iowa model, Ottawa model, and models for evidence based multi-disciplinary practice and changing practice. The Ottawa Model of Research Use views research use as a dynamic process involving interconnected decisions by individuals relating to evidence-based innovations, potential adopters,
Ebd jc part 5
This document summarizes a journal club presentation about critically appraising papers on dental therapy. It discusses key questions to consider when evaluating randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews relating to new therapeutic interventions. These include whether patient allocation was randomized, all patients were accounted for, blinding was used, groups were similar at outset, clinically important outcomes were assessed, and results can be applied to patients. It also reviews criteria for assessing systematic reviews, such as whether a clear question was asked, inclusion criteria were appropriate, search was comprehensive, study validity was evaluated, and findings were combined correctly.
Methodology Checklist: Controlled Trials
This document provides a methodology checklist for assessing controlled trials. It includes questions to evaluate the internal validity of trials, such as whether randomization and blinding were adequately conducted. It also has sections to assess the overall quality of the study on a scale from high to low, determine if the results are directly due to the intervention being studied, and evaluate the applicability of the results to the guideline's target patient group. Reviewers are to use this checklist to systematically evaluate controlled trials and assign an evidence quality rating.
Levels of evidence, recommendations & phases of
This document discusses levels of evidence and phases of clinical trials. It defines evidence-based medicine as using current best evidence from systematic research to make decisions about patient care. Levels of evidence are ranked from 1A to 5 based on study design, with systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials ranked highest. Clinical trials progress through four phases to test safety, efficacy, and optimal use of new drugs or devices. Phase 1 assesses safety, phase 2 establishes efficacy, phase 3 confirms safety and efficacy in larger groups, and phase 4 studies monitor risks and benefits after marketing.
Recommended
How to use medical literature
This document provides guidance for clinicians on critically evaluating new medical studies and literature. It outlines key questions to consider in order to determine if a study's findings are likely to be true, important, and applicable to patients. Some areas to focus on include the study design, methods, results, conclusions, relevance and applicability of the population and time period studied. Considering these factors can help clinicians decide if new research is worth incorporating into their practice. The document emphasizes analyzing new findings in the context of existing knowledge.
PICO question
This document discusses developing PICO questions to help formulate clinical questions. It provides background on distinguishing background and foreground questions. The PICO framework is introduced as a method to structure clinical questions into four components: P (patient/population), I (intervention), C (comparison), and O (outcome). Examples are provided to demonstrate how to formulate a PICO question from a clinical scenario. The question types that can be addressed through PICO questions are also outlined.
Evidence Based Practice
This document outlines the steps of the evidence-based medicine process which includes assessing the patient, asking a question, acquiring resources, appraising the evidence, and applying to the patient. It discusses how to formulate a well-built clinical question using PICO(TT) and describes the different types of study designs and evidence hierarchies. Guidelines are provided for evaluating the quality of individual studies, such as using the FRISBE checklist, and for critically appraising systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Critically appraise evidence based findings
The document discusses critical appraisal of evidence-based findings. It defines critical appraisal as assessing the strength and quality of scientific evidence to evaluate its applicability to healthcare decision making. Strength of evidence depends on factors like quality, quantity, and consistency of research. Evidence is ranked in levels based on research design, with systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials having the highest levels of evidence. Evaluating the quality and applicability of evidence involves assessing the validity of results and whether results can be applied to target populations. Statistical evaluation through effect sizes can also aid in appraising evidence.
Evidence based nursing practice
Evidence based nursing practice involves making clinical decisions using the best available research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences. However, 30-45% of patients do not receive care according to scientific evidence, and 20-25% of care provided is potentially harmful. Evidence based nursing practice solves problems through four steps: identifying issues, performing literature searches, evaluating research evidence, and selecting interventions justified by evidence. Several conceptual models can help understand contextual factors influencing knowledge translation, including the Stetler model, Iowa model, Ottawa model, and models for evidence based multi-disciplinary practice and changing practice. The Ottawa Model of Research Use views research use as a dynamic process involving interconnected decisions by individuals relating to evidence-based innovations, potential adopters,
Ebd jc part 5
This document summarizes a journal club presentation about critically appraising papers on dental therapy. It discusses key questions to consider when evaluating randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews relating to new therapeutic interventions. These include whether patient allocation was randomized, all patients were accounted for, blinding was used, groups were similar at outset, clinically important outcomes were assessed, and results can be applied to patients. It also reviews criteria for assessing systematic reviews, such as whether a clear question was asked, inclusion criteria were appropriate, search was comprehensive, study validity was evaluated, and findings were combined correctly.
Methodology Checklist: Controlled Trials
This document provides a methodology checklist for assessing controlled trials. It includes questions to evaluate the internal validity of trials, such as whether randomization and blinding were adequately conducted. It also has sections to assess the overall quality of the study on a scale from high to low, determine if the results are directly due to the intervention being studied, and evaluate the applicability of the results to the guideline's target patient group. Reviewers are to use this checklist to systematically evaluate controlled trials and assign an evidence quality rating.
Levels of evidence, recommendations & phases of
This document discusses levels of evidence and phases of clinical trials. It defines evidence-based medicine as using current best evidence from systematic research to make decisions about patient care. Levels of evidence are ranked from 1A to 5 based on study design, with systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials ranked highest. Clinical trials progress through four phases to test safety, efficacy, and optimal use of new drugs or devices. Phase 1 assesses safety, phase 2 establishes efficacy, phase 3 confirms safety and efficacy in larger groups, and phase 4 studies monitor risks and benefits after marketing.
Patient management and clinical decision
This document discusses clinical decision making and patient management in physical therapy. It outlines:
1. The requirements for skilled clinical decision making, including knowledge, experience, critical thinking, and evidence-based practice.
2. The steps of evidence-based practice, which involves forming a question, searching literature, analyzing evidence, and integrating findings into patient care.
3. A patient management model to help patients achieve their highest level of function through a process that includes examination, evaluation, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment plan, and intervention.
Critical appraisal
This document provides an introduction to critical appraisal of research evidence. It discusses the importance of critically appraising research in order to determine the validity, relevance and applicability of findings to clinical practice. Both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies are covered. Key steps in critically appraising systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials and qualitative research studies are outlined. These include assessing the appropriateness of the research question, methodology, analysis and applicability of results. Conducting effective critical appraisal workshops is also addressed.
Quick introduction to critical appraisal of quantitative research
1) The document provides an introduction to critically appraising quantitative research for healthcare. It discusses key concepts such as levels of evidence, validity, reliability, and transferability.
2) Critical appraisal involves assessing a study's validity, rigor, and relevance through a structured process using checklists to evaluate aspects like research design, sample size, randomization, and potential for bias.
3) Statistical measures like p-values, confidence intervals, and effect sizes are important to consider, but clinical significance is also key when determining if results can be applied to practice.
Dhiwahar ppt
This document provides an overview of critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It defines critical appraisal as carefully examining research to assess its trustworthiness and relevance. RCTs are described as the gold standard for clinical trials, where participants are randomly allocated to groups that receive either a treatment or a control. Key factors to examine in appraising an RCT are described, including sample size, eligibility criteria, baseline characteristics, randomization, blinding, follow-up of participants, data collection, presentation of results, and applicability to local populations. Advantages of critical appraisal and RCTs include providing a systematic way to assess research validity and improving practice, while disadvantages include taking time and not always finding clear answers.
EBM in the Library - PICO
This document discusses evidence-based medicine and how libraries can support practitioners. It defines evidence-based medicine as using the best available evidence from research to inform decisions about patient care. The library teaches skills like formulating clinical questions using the PICO framework and identifying appropriate sources and studies to answer questions. Librarians can help practitioners develop search strategies, appraise literature, and apply evidence to patient cases. The document provides examples of using PICO to build clinical questions from practice scenarios.
Acs0004 Evidence Based Surgery
This document discusses evidence-based surgery and how surgeons evaluate the strength of evidence for surgical practices. It covers:
1) Guidelines and secondary sources that surgeons can use to inform evidence-based practice, but notes individual surgeons must also evaluate primary studies.
2) Factors used to evaluate the validity of scientific studies, including internal validity (study quality), external validity (generalizability), and the influence of chance, bias, and confounding.
3) Hierarchies of evidence that rank study designs, with randomized controlled trials considered the strongest, but these systems have limitations and surgeons must make judgments.
Allocation Concealment
This document defines allocation concealment and discusses its importance in clinical trials. Allocation concealment refers to preventing investigators from knowing the next treatment assignment so they cannot influence which participants are assigned to different study arms. Inadequate allocation concealment can introduce bias and invalidate trial results. The document provides examples of how allocation concealment can be deciphered or biased and recommends methods like sequentially numbered sealed envelopes and centralized randomization to properly conceal allocations.
Pico framework for framing systematic review research questions - Pubrica
P Patient, problem, population
I ‑ Intervention, prognostic factor, exposure
C ‑ Comparison
O ‑ Outcome
Continue Reading: https://bit.ly/3igMAQ4
For our services: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, We promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Biostatistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44- 74248 10299
Critical appraisal of published medical research
This document discusses critical appraisal of published medical research. It notes that thousands of new medical articles are published daily, making it difficult for clinicians to keep up-to-date. Critical appraisal involves assessing the validity, reliability, and applicability of a study rather than just dismissing it or looking only at the results. Key aspects of critical appraisal include describing the evidence, assessing internal validity by examining potential biases and confounding factors, evaluating external validity and whether results can apply to other populations, and comparing results to other evidence. The document provides guidance on how to critically appraise studies and lists resources for further information.
Blinding in clinical trials
1) Blinding in clinical trials refers to keeping trial participants, investigators, and assessors unaware of treatment assignments to prevent bias.
2) Potential benefits of blinding include less psychological or physical bias in participants, better compliance, and less bias in outcome assessments.
3) Types of blinding include non-blinded (where all know assignments), single-blinded (one group remains unaware), and double-blinded (participants, investigators, and assessors remain unaware). Placebos are often used to maintain blinding.
Critical appraisal guideline
This document provides an overview of evidence-based medicine and how to critically appraise clinical papers. It discusses how evidence-based medicine involves using both clinical expertise and the best available external evidence in decision making. The origins of evidence-based medicine in the 1970s and 1990s are also reviewed. The document then focuses on how to critically read clinical papers, including the key things to assess for diagnostic tests, clinical course/prognosis, causation, and therapy papers. It provides guidance on an appraisal format and emphasizes the need to both evaluate the study and summarize what it was about. Evidence-based medicine is positioned as an important guide but not a replacement for clinical expertise and judgment.
Study design
This document discusses and compares various study designs used in medical research, including observational studies like case reports, case series, case-control studies, and cohort studies as well as experimental studies like randomized controlled trials. It provides descriptions of each study design along with their pros and cons. For example, it notes that case reports are useful for raising hypotheses but very rare to use to make statements of causation, while randomized controlled trials allow for control of therapy but have ethical and cost issues.
Cross sectional design
The document discusses different types of cross-sectional and cohort research designs used in marketing research. A cross-sectional design involves collecting information from a sample of a population once, while a multiple cross-sectional design collects information from different samples at different time points. Cohort analysis surveys the same group of respondents over time as they experience an event. An example case study tracks soft drink consumption in the US over 30 years in 10-year intervals by cohort.
HLinc presentation: levels of evidence
What are hierarchies of evidence and why are they used? How are they different from grades of recommendation? HLinc presentation May 2014
Research Design
The document discusses different types of research designs, including explanatory trials which aim to study efficacy under ideal conditions, pragmatic trials which aim to study effectiveness in regular clinical practice, and cost benefit studies which aim to study efficiency in relation to resources consumed. It also discusses analytical studies, experimental trials using control groups, randomized controlled trials including group comparative and cross-over designs, non-randomized controlled trials, uncontrolled clinical trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and case control studies. The key aspects of each design such as whether they are prospective or retrospective and examples are provided.
Critical Appraisal Overview
The document outlines an agenda for a critical appraisal master class that will cover evidence-based medicine principles, critical appraisal of different study types including clinical studies, lab research, and qualitative work. It provides an introduction to the presenters and an outline of topics to be discussed including evidence-based medicine, critical appraisal keys of validity, applicability and impact. Case studies will also be used to demonstrate how to approach appraising a research paper.
A Graduate Critical Appraisal Assignment for Athletic Training
1) The document discusses a graduated critical appraisal assignment used to teach athletic training students how to critically analyze research studies. 2) It involves having students start with annotating articles and working up to crafting clinical questions, analyzing levels of evidence, and fully critically appraising studies. 3) The assignment is meant to help students develop skills in evidence-based practice and preparing them for real-world clinical decision making.
Introduction to critical appraisal
This document provides an introduction to critical appraisal of literature. It discusses the importance of critically evaluating research to separate reliable evidence from unreliable evidence. It outlines the process of critical appraisal, including asking a focused question, finding relevant evidence, and using appraisal tools to systematically examine research quality, validity, and relevance. The document also introduces some key statistical concepts used in research, such as p-values, confidence intervals, risk reduction, and number needed to treat. The goal of critical appraisal is to make informed decisions about integrating research findings into clinical practice and policy.
Critical appraisal of published medical research (2)
This document outlines 8 steps for critically appraising published medical research: 1) consider the research hypothesis, 2) study design, 3) outcome variable, 4) predictor variables, 5) methods of analysis, 6) potential sources of bias, 7) interpretation of results, and 8) utility of results. For each step, it provides questions to consider when evaluating if a study has addressed that aspect appropriately and rigorously. The goal is to systematically evaluate the strengths and limitations of a published study.
Inspector recruitment
This document contains testimonials from 10 inspectors about their careers working for Europe's largest medicines inspectorate. The inspectors describe the role as challenging and interesting with opportunities for progression. They find satisfaction in helping to improve people's lives and public health. The inspectors also note benefits like flexibility, the ability to work remotely, and career progression into management positions. The role involves ensuring compliance with regulations to ensure the quality and safety of medicines.
El crepúsculo de la era trágica del petróleo (Ramón Fernández Durán junio 200...
El crepúsculo de la era trágica del petróleo (Ramón Fernández Durán junio 200...Ecologistas en Accion
El crepúsculo de la era trágica del petróleo (Ramón Fernández Durán junio 2008) Lecturas recomendadas Samuel Martín-SosaT-MDS2
The document proposes a new methodology called T-MDS for monitoring economics networks. T-MDS is a two-step process that first applies a threshold to remove unimportant edges from a network. It then identifies the minimum dominating set (MDS) to find the most representative nodes. This produces a simplified representation of the original network while retaining necessary information. The document discusses applications of T-MDS to analyze banking systems, business cycles, income inequality, and inflation.
More Related Content
What's hot
Patient management and clinical decision
This document discusses clinical decision making and patient management in physical therapy. It outlines:
1. The requirements for skilled clinical decision making, including knowledge, experience, critical thinking, and evidence-based practice.
2. The steps of evidence-based practice, which involves forming a question, searching literature, analyzing evidence, and integrating findings into patient care.
3. A patient management model to help patients achieve their highest level of function through a process that includes examination, evaluation, diagnosis, prognosis, treatment plan, and intervention.
Critical appraisal
This document provides an introduction to critical appraisal of research evidence. It discusses the importance of critically appraising research in order to determine the validity, relevance and applicability of findings to clinical practice. Both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies are covered. Key steps in critically appraising systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials and qualitative research studies are outlined. These include assessing the appropriateness of the research question, methodology, analysis and applicability of results. Conducting effective critical appraisal workshops is also addressed.
Quick introduction to critical appraisal of quantitative research
1) The document provides an introduction to critically appraising quantitative research for healthcare. It discusses key concepts such as levels of evidence, validity, reliability, and transferability.
2) Critical appraisal involves assessing a study's validity, rigor, and relevance through a structured process using checklists to evaluate aspects like research design, sample size, randomization, and potential for bias.
3) Statistical measures like p-values, confidence intervals, and effect sizes are important to consider, but clinical significance is also key when determining if results can be applied to practice.
Dhiwahar ppt
This document provides an overview of critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It defines critical appraisal as carefully examining research to assess its trustworthiness and relevance. RCTs are described as the gold standard for clinical trials, where participants are randomly allocated to groups that receive either a treatment or a control. Key factors to examine in appraising an RCT are described, including sample size, eligibility criteria, baseline characteristics, randomization, blinding, follow-up of participants, data collection, presentation of results, and applicability to local populations. Advantages of critical appraisal and RCTs include providing a systematic way to assess research validity and improving practice, while disadvantages include taking time and not always finding clear answers.
EBM in the Library - PICO
This document discusses evidence-based medicine and how libraries can support practitioners. It defines evidence-based medicine as using the best available evidence from research to inform decisions about patient care. The library teaches skills like formulating clinical questions using the PICO framework and identifying appropriate sources and studies to answer questions. Librarians can help practitioners develop search strategies, appraise literature, and apply evidence to patient cases. The document provides examples of using PICO to build clinical questions from practice scenarios.
Acs0004 Evidence Based Surgery
This document discusses evidence-based surgery and how surgeons evaluate the strength of evidence for surgical practices. It covers:
1) Guidelines and secondary sources that surgeons can use to inform evidence-based practice, but notes individual surgeons must also evaluate primary studies.
2) Factors used to evaluate the validity of scientific studies, including internal validity (study quality), external validity (generalizability), and the influence of chance, bias, and confounding.
3) Hierarchies of evidence that rank study designs, with randomized controlled trials considered the strongest, but these systems have limitations and surgeons must make judgments.
Allocation Concealment
This document defines allocation concealment and discusses its importance in clinical trials. Allocation concealment refers to preventing investigators from knowing the next treatment assignment so they cannot influence which participants are assigned to different study arms. Inadequate allocation concealment can introduce bias and invalidate trial results. The document provides examples of how allocation concealment can be deciphered or biased and recommends methods like sequentially numbered sealed envelopes and centralized randomization to properly conceal allocations.
Pico framework for framing systematic review research questions - Pubrica
P Patient, problem, population
I ‑ Intervention, prognostic factor, exposure
C ‑ Comparison
O ‑ Outcome
Continue Reading: https://bit.ly/3igMAQ4
For our services: https://pubrica.com/services/research-services/systematic-review/
Why Pubrica:
When you order our services, We promise you the following – Plagiarism free | always on Time | 24*7 customer support | Written to international Standard | Unlimited Revisions support | Medical writing Expert | Publication Support | Biostatistical experts | High-quality Subject Matter Experts.
Contact us:
Web: https://pubrica.com/
Blog: https://pubrica.com/academy/
Email: sales@pubrica.com
WhatsApp : +91 9884350006
United Kingdom: +44- 74248 10299
Critical appraisal of published medical research
This document discusses critical appraisal of published medical research. It notes that thousands of new medical articles are published daily, making it difficult for clinicians to keep up-to-date. Critical appraisal involves assessing the validity, reliability, and applicability of a study rather than just dismissing it or looking only at the results. Key aspects of critical appraisal include describing the evidence, assessing internal validity by examining potential biases and confounding factors, evaluating external validity and whether results can apply to other populations, and comparing results to other evidence. The document provides guidance on how to critically appraise studies and lists resources for further information.
Blinding in clinical trials
1) Blinding in clinical trials refers to keeping trial participants, investigators, and assessors unaware of treatment assignments to prevent bias.
2) Potential benefits of blinding include less psychological or physical bias in participants, better compliance, and less bias in outcome assessments.
3) Types of blinding include non-blinded (where all know assignments), single-blinded (one group remains unaware), and double-blinded (participants, investigators, and assessors remain unaware). Placebos are often used to maintain blinding.
Critical appraisal guideline
This document provides an overview of evidence-based medicine and how to critically appraise clinical papers. It discusses how evidence-based medicine involves using both clinical expertise and the best available external evidence in decision making. The origins of evidence-based medicine in the 1970s and 1990s are also reviewed. The document then focuses on how to critically read clinical papers, including the key things to assess for diagnostic tests, clinical course/prognosis, causation, and therapy papers. It provides guidance on an appraisal format and emphasizes the need to both evaluate the study and summarize what it was about. Evidence-based medicine is positioned as an important guide but not a replacement for clinical expertise and judgment.
Study design
This document discusses and compares various study designs used in medical research, including observational studies like case reports, case series, case-control studies, and cohort studies as well as experimental studies like randomized controlled trials. It provides descriptions of each study design along with their pros and cons. For example, it notes that case reports are useful for raising hypotheses but very rare to use to make statements of causation, while randomized controlled trials allow for control of therapy but have ethical and cost issues.
Cross sectional design
The document discusses different types of cross-sectional and cohort research designs used in marketing research. A cross-sectional design involves collecting information from a sample of a population once, while a multiple cross-sectional design collects information from different samples at different time points. Cohort analysis surveys the same group of respondents over time as they experience an event. An example case study tracks soft drink consumption in the US over 30 years in 10-year intervals by cohort.
HLinc presentation: levels of evidence
What are hierarchies of evidence and why are they used? How are they different from grades of recommendation? HLinc presentation May 2014
Research Design
The document discusses different types of research designs, including explanatory trials which aim to study efficacy under ideal conditions, pragmatic trials which aim to study effectiveness in regular clinical practice, and cost benefit studies which aim to study efficiency in relation to resources consumed. It also discusses analytical studies, experimental trials using control groups, randomized controlled trials including group comparative and cross-over designs, non-randomized controlled trials, uncontrolled clinical trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and case control studies. The key aspects of each design such as whether they are prospective or retrospective and examples are provided.
Critical Appraisal Overview
The document outlines an agenda for a critical appraisal master class that will cover evidence-based medicine principles, critical appraisal of different study types including clinical studies, lab research, and qualitative work. It provides an introduction to the presenters and an outline of topics to be discussed including evidence-based medicine, critical appraisal keys of validity, applicability and impact. Case studies will also be used to demonstrate how to approach appraising a research paper.
A Graduate Critical Appraisal Assignment for Athletic Training
1) The document discusses a graduated critical appraisal assignment used to teach athletic training students how to critically analyze research studies. 2) It involves having students start with annotating articles and working up to crafting clinical questions, analyzing levels of evidence, and fully critically appraising studies. 3) The assignment is meant to help students develop skills in evidence-based practice and preparing them for real-world clinical decision making.
Introduction to critical appraisal
This document provides an introduction to critical appraisal of literature. It discusses the importance of critically evaluating research to separate reliable evidence from unreliable evidence. It outlines the process of critical appraisal, including asking a focused question, finding relevant evidence, and using appraisal tools to systematically examine research quality, validity, and relevance. The document also introduces some key statistical concepts used in research, such as p-values, confidence intervals, risk reduction, and number needed to treat. The goal of critical appraisal is to make informed decisions about integrating research findings into clinical practice and policy.
Critical appraisal of published medical research (2)
This document outlines 8 steps for critically appraising published medical research: 1) consider the research hypothesis, 2) study design, 3) outcome variable, 4) predictor variables, 5) methods of analysis, 6) potential sources of bias, 7) interpretation of results, and 8) utility of results. For each step, it provides questions to consider when evaluating if a study has addressed that aspect appropriately and rigorously. The goal is to systematically evaluate the strengths and limitations of a published study.
What's hot (19)
Quick introduction to critical appraisal of quantitative research
Quick introduction to critical appraisal of quantitative research
Pico framework for framing systematic review research questions - Pubrica
Pico framework for framing systematic review research questions - Pubrica
A Graduate Critical Appraisal Assignment for Athletic Training
A Graduate Critical Appraisal Assignment for Athletic Training
Critical appraisal of published medical research (2)
Critical appraisal of published medical research (2)
Viewers also liked
Inspector recruitment
This document contains testimonials from 10 inspectors about their careers working for Europe's largest medicines inspectorate. The inspectors describe the role as challenging and interesting with opportunities for progression. They find satisfaction in helping to improve people's lives and public health. The inspectors also note benefits like flexibility, the ability to work remotely, and career progression into management positions. The role involves ensuring compliance with regulations to ensure the quality and safety of medicines.
El crepúsculo de la era trágica del petróleo (Ramón Fernández Durán junio 200...
El crepúsculo de la era trágica del petróleo (Ramón Fernández Durán junio 200...Ecologistas en Accion
El crepúsculo de la era trágica del petróleo (Ramón Fernández Durán junio 2008) Lecturas recomendadas Samuel Martín-SosaT-MDS2
The document proposes a new methodology called T-MDS for monitoring economics networks. T-MDS is a two-step process that first applies a threshold to remove unimportant edges from a network. It then identifies the minimum dominating set (MDS) to find the most representative nodes. This produces a simplified representation of the original network while retaining necessary information. The document discusses applications of T-MDS to analyze banking systems, business cycles, income inequality, and inflation.
Digimap Copyright webinar
Slideused in a webinar on the copyright and terms of use for Digimap Ordnance Survey Collection. Delivered 1 April 2015.
My Self+Name,Nickname, Age+ป.1+104+dltvengp1+54en p01 f23-1page
The document contains greetings and introductions between two individuals. They ask each other how they are, and share their names. One individual counts from one to ten and says they can sing and count. Farewells are then exchanged.
Costume designs cloven
The document discusses initial costume designs for characters in the film trailer "Cloven". It describes designing gloomy, dull costumes to fit the horror genre. Marcus wears a t-shirt and shorts to represent his masculinity. Hayley's costume is brighter to contrast her outgoing personality with the shy Sam. Vinnie is dressed casually rather than for camping to show he is an outsider. Ben's outfit resembles Marcus' but with a coat to show he is sporty but sensible. The costumes aim to reflect each character's personality while mostly keeping to a camping theme with some casual elements to represent the characters as teenagers.
My Self+Name,Nickname, Age+ป.1+104+dltvengp1+54en p01 f23-4page
The document contains basic conversational phrases and counting in Thai. It introduces greetings like hello and how are you, asks and provides a name, counts from one to ten, and repeats phrases for practice.
United nations post 2015 development agenda and family needs-olson
The document discusses the United Nations post-2015 development agenda and sustainable development goals (SDGs) and their relation to family needs. It provides an overview of the SDGs, which were proposed in 2014 and cover 17 social, economic, and environmental goals. It notes that all SDGs relate directly or indirectly to family needs. Specifically, it examines SDG 5 on gender equality and empowering women and girls, focusing on Target 5.4 on recognizing unpaid care work and Target 5.b on enhancing technology to promote women's empowerment. The next steps are to determine indicators to measure progress on these targets and finalize and implement the new development agenda by the 2015 UN summit.
Crt 103 design
The document describes the CRT-103 hanger for the Crowdertrack Round Bar Track sliding door system. The CRT-103 is a face mount hanger designed for use with tempered glass doors and provides a high-end, exposed barn door style look. The hanger and track are made of polished stainless steel and precision machined for a state-of-the-art appearance.
Pâques à antsirabe
voici quelques photos prises à Antsirabe dans le cadre de la préparation de la licence fle.
Δραστηριότητες Lego με scratch...
The document provides instructions for building and programming various models using the LEGO WeDo kit with the Scratch programming environment, including descriptions of top spinner, ball kicker, goal keeper, cheering fans, alligator chomp, bird flap, lion roar, and monkey drummer projects that utilize the WeDo motor and sensors to create interactive models and games. Each project lists the estimated build time, required components, and provides a high-level overview of the programming steps to bring the model to life using Scratch.
Soal Latihan UN Fisika SMA 2015 - 1
Dokumen tersebut berisi soal-soal tes pilihan ganda dari berbagai bidang studi fisika, seperti mekanika, termodinamika, gelombang, dan elektromagnetisme. Terdapat 30 pertanyaan yang mencakup konsep-konsep dasar fisika.
Gestione della Programmazione Unitaria
Gestione della Programmazione UnitariaIstituto Nazionale di Documentazione, Innovazione e Ricerca Educativa
La descrizione del sistema informativo online per la governance del PON PER LA SCUOLA 2014-2020 sviluppato da Indire per le scuole.Martin Luther King
Martin Luther King nasceu em 1929 e se tornou pastor batista aos 19 anos. Ele liderou o boicote de um ano aos ônibus de Montgomery após uma mulher negra ser presa por se recusar a ceder o assento para uma mulher branca. King fundou a Conferência da Liderança Cristã no Sul em 1957 e usou métodos pacíficos inspirados por Gandhi para lutar pelos direitos civis, incluindo a famosa Marcha em Washington em 1963. Ele foi assassinado em 1968.
Viewers also liked (15)
El crepúsculo de la era trágica del petróleo (Ramón Fernández Durán junio 200...
El crepúsculo de la era trágica del petróleo (Ramón Fernández Durán junio 200...
My Self+Name,Nickname, Age+ป.1+104+dltvengp1+54en p01 f23-1page
My Self+Name,Nickname, Age+ป.1+104+dltvengp1+54en p01 f23-1page
My Self+Name,Nickname, Age+ป.1+104+dltvengp1+54en p01 f23-4page
My Self+Name,Nickname, Age+ป.1+104+dltvengp1+54en p01 f23-4page
United nations post 2015 development agenda and family needs-olson
United nations post 2015 development agenda and family needs-olson
Similar to Research in Hospital
Introduction to nursing research
The document provides an overview of nursing research, including the importance of research, different types of research designs, and the major phases of the research process. It discusses how nursing research applies the scientific method to study topics relevant to nursing practice. The goal is to improve patient care by integrating research findings into clinical decision making. The document also outlines key concepts in research methodology, such as variables, data collection, rigor, and sampling.
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
A well-developed and reliable body of knowledge is a foundation for any profession. The most sought-after knowledge can be acquired from highly structured as well as loosely arranged processes or methods. Traditionally, loosely arranged methods are used to develop knowledge, such as inherited traditions, authority, experience, intuition and trial and error method. However, with increased complexity in development, researchers discovered more structured methods for generation of new knowledge such as logical reasoning, problem solving, and scientific methods.
LESSON-1-Quantitative-Research-Characteristics-and-Importance.pptx
This document discusses quantitative research, defining it as research that uses numerical data and statistical analysis to explain phenomena. It notes that quantitative research aims to be objective and reliable by reducing problems to variables that can be measured. The document outlines key characteristics of quantitative research, including that it tests hypotheses, looks at relationships between variables, and generalizes findings from a sample to a population. It also discusses advantages like objectivity and replicability, as well as disadvantages like ignoring context. Finally, it explores the importance of quantitative research in fields like education, business, medicine, science and technology.
CONCEPTUALIZATION AND PLANNING RESEARCH.pptx
This document discusses the conceptual phase and design/planning phase of quantitative research. It covers developing a research problem by selecting and narrowing a topic, evaluating problems based on significance, researchability and feasibility. It also discusses formulating a final research problem statement. The conceptual phase also involves reviewing related literature and defining a theoretical framework. Developing hypotheses is also covered. The design/planning phase involves selecting a research design such as experimental, quasi-experimental, or pre-experimental designs. Key methodological decisions are made to ensure validity and credibility of study findings.
Evaluation terms
This document discusses key methodological concepts in psychological research such as ecological validity, sampling, controls, generalizability, ethics, and reliability. It poses questions about each concept's relevance to assessing the strengths and weaknesses of psychological studies. The document does not describe a specific study but rather outlines important criteria for evaluating research methodology.
Validity of Evidence
This summarizes Chapter 4 of Dollaghen (2007) which discusses the concepts of validity in research studies and clinical practice. It outlines the differences between internal and external validity, and how validity relates to both empirical evidence from research as well as clinical situations involving patient preferences. Issues like confounding variables, subjective bias, randomization, and study design types are also examined in relation to evaluating the validity and generalizability of findings.
Nursing Research 1 Day 1.pptx
This document provides an overview of nursing research. It begins by defining research and nursing research. The objectives of the document are then outlined, which include defining key terms, discussing the role of nurses in research, and describing the nursing research process. An overview of the history of nursing research is also provided, highlighting important milestones from 1859 to present. The importance of nursing research in developing an evidence-based practice and advancing the nursing profession is discussed.
Research findings in nursing practice
The document discusses research utilization in nursing practice. During the 1980s and 1990s, there was a focus on developing the nursing knowledge base and addressing clinical problems through research. However, a gap remained between research findings and practice. Now, nurses are better prepared as researchers and utilize findings to improve care quality, effectiveness and safety. Barriers to research use include issues with the research itself, nurses' skills and attitudes, organizational culture, and the nursing profession. Bridging this research-practice gap requires high-quality evidence, understanding the clinical context, and facilitation to help nurses implement changes. Nurse practitioners are well-positioned to promote research utilization given their dual expertise in clinical practice and research.
1. Methods of acquiring knowledge in Nursing.pptx
1) Nursing knowledge can be acquired through both unstructured and structured methods. Unstructured methods include tradition, authority, intuition, experience, and trial and error. Structured methods include inductive reasoning, deductive reasoning, assembled information, and the scientific problem-solving process.
2) Research is considered the most formal and systematic way of developing an organized body of nursing knowledge through the use of the scientific method. It involves identifying problems, analyzing them, generating and evaluating potential solutions, implementing solutions, and revising if needed.
3) Both unstructured and structured methods play a role in developing the nursing profession's knowledge base, but structured research provides the strongest scientific foundation for nursing practice.
Research Question and Hypothesis
Here are the answers to your questions:
1. FINER criteria of a good research question are: Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, Relevant.
2. A null hypothesis is a statistical hypothesis that predicts that no relationship exists between two variables.
3. The types of relationships that may exist between two variables are: positive, negative, or no relationship.
4. Read around comes first before read into. Read around gives a broad overview of the topic area, while read into involves an in-depth review.
5. The literature review is often called the "mother of the research" as it helps identify gaps and formulate the research question.
6. If we
Research utilization
It is the process of transferring the research knowledge into practice, thus facilitating an innovative change in practice of protocols. Research utilization is the use of the findings from a disciplined study or a set of studies in a practical application that is unrelated to the original research.
Introduction to Research Methodology.pptx
This document provides an introduction to research methodology. It defines research as a systematic process of investigating questions in a rigorous, empirical and unbiased manner. The goal of research is to increase understanding and solve problems. It discusses different types of research such as descriptive, correlational, explanatory and exploratory research. Research can be applied to improve professional practice and services. Both qualitative and quantitative approaches have merits, and a combination may be best. Overall, research requires a structured, evidence-based inquiry to answer questions in a valid and verifiable way.
Nursing research
This document provides an introduction and overview of nursing research. It discusses the objectives of understanding the differences between qualitative and quantitative research, the tools used for conducting research, what research is, the process of doing nursing research, and its importance. Nursing research helps develop knowledge about health and develops evidence-based practices to improve patient care and outcomes. It explains the research process which involves defining a problem, developing a hypothesis, collecting and analyzing data, discussing results. Both qualitative and quantitative methodologies are covered, with qualitative focusing on open-ended methods to understand perspectives and quantitative using numerical data to find patterns. Nursing research is important for adopting evidence-based practices and developing consistent, well-founded practices that improve health outcomes and reduce costs.
Introduction of nursing research
The document discusses nursing research and methods of acquiring knowledge in nursing. It defines research as a systematic, rigorous process of inquiry aimed at developing new knowledge or validating existing knowledge. Nursing research specifically seeks to expand the body of knowledge around nursing practice, education, administration, and informatics. Knowledge in nursing can be acquired through both unstructured methods like tradition, authority, and experience, as well as structured methods like scientific research, inductive/deductive reasoning, and problem-solving. Problem-solving follows a defined process of problem definition, analysis, generating and analyzing solutions, and evaluation. The scientific research process involves selecting a topic, reviewing literature, developing hypotheses, collecting and analyzing data, and communicating findings.
Psychology module 4
Research using scientific methods like observation, experimentation, and statistical analysis allows psychologists to learn more about human behavior in a systematic way compared to relying solely on common sense or personal experiences. Various types of research strategies have advantages and disadvantages. Experiments are the only method that can establish cause-and-effect relationships by manipulating an independent variable and observing its impact on a dependent variable. However, other observational methods like case studies and surveys provide important insights too. Researchers must consider factors like bias, random assignment, blind procedures, placebos, sample sizes, and replication to draw valid conclusions while also following ethical guidelines to protect human and animal subjects.
Biostatistics for clinician.pptx
Biostatistics is one of the most unavoidable area in the modern day practice of evidence based medicine . In the ppt , trying to give a glimpse on how a clinician should approach Biostatistics
Qualitative Online Course Rds Unit 1
This document provides an overview of qualitative research methods and question formulation. It discusses key aspects of qualitative research including theoretical backgrounds in ethnography, phenomenology and grounded theory. Examples of qualitative research questions and methods like observation and interviews are provided. The importance of qualitative research in understanding human experiences and perspectives is highlighted. Guidance on formulating focused qualitative research questions using frameworks like PICO, SPICE, ProPheT and CLIP is also given.
RESEARCH PROBLEM.pptx made by Navdeep Kaur
A research problem is a specific issue or gap in existing knowledge that you aim to address in your research.
Research Activity 1.docx
ACTIVITY 1
Chosen Research Design: Qualitative
Why do you think this design is appropriate to your research interest?
Based on my understanding of qualitative research, I believe it can be appropriate for certain types of research questions. In my view, qualitative research is particularly useful for exploring complex phenomena, gaining insights into people's experiences and perspectives, and developing theory. I also recognize that it can be valuable in applied settings, such as healthcare or social work, where understanding people's experiences is crucial for improving practice.
Guide Questions
1. Did you remember the research design listed in the table?
YES, I have remembered all the research design listed in the table.
2. What other research designs did you recall which is/ are not listed in the table?
Longitudinal Study
Cross-sectional Study
Survey Research
Action Research
Participatory Action Research
Grounded Theory
Ethnographic Research
3. Was it easy or hard to determine the research design to be used in your selected topic or interest?
For me, it is easy because in the first place I already have an idea where to start. I believe when you select a topic, you already considered what design you will use.
4. What are the factors that you consider in selecting a research design for your study?
As a researcher, I must consider various factors when selecting a qualitative research design for my study. These include the research question, the purpose of the study, the nature of the phenomenon being studied, and the available resources and time frame. Additionally, I must reflect on my own philosophical and theoretical perspectives to ensure that the chosen design aligns with my worldview and research goals.
Reflection
How does research design make your study colorful/ interesting?
As a researcher, I have come to appreciate how qualitative research design can add color and interest to a study. By using methods such as open-ended interviews, observations, and document analysis, I can capture the rich and complex experiences, perspectives, and contexts of the participants. This type of research allows me to delve deeper into the phenomenon being studied and gain a more nuanced understanding of it.
One of the benefits of using qualitative research is the ability to create vivid descriptions, quotes, and narratives that add depth and meaning to the study. It's fascinating to see how the data can come to life and offer a unique perspective on the topic. Additionally, I've found that unexpected findings often emerge during qualitative research, which can add to the intrigue and interest of the study.
Overall, I believe that qualitative research design offers a powerful way to explore the intricacies and nuances of human experience. It enables me to create a study that is more compelling and engaging, as well as provides insights that cannot be obtained through other research methods.
ACTIVITY 2: TELL ME THE QUANTITY
Directions: Read the qu
Sardar CK DPT MSPT EBP LECTURE 3 part 2.pptx
1. Qualitative research methods are useful for studying human experiences, communication, thoughts, and processes through techniques like in-depth interviews and observation.
2. Qualitative methods allow physical therapists to better understand patient feelings, perceptions, and the meanings behind their behaviors by directly communicating with and observing patients.
3. While qualitative research provides insights into patient attitudes and experiences, it cannot definitively answer questions about the effects of interventions. Caution must be taken not to directly infer that a treatment should be used based solely on patient experiences.
Similar to Research in Hospital (20)
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
LESSON-1-Quantitative-Research-Characteristics-and-Importance.pptx
LESSON-1-Quantitative-Research-Characteristics-and-Importance.pptx
Recently uploaded
CCSN_June_06 2024_jones. Cancer Rehabpptx
About this webinar: This talk will introduce what cancer rehabilitation is, where it fits into the cancer trajectory, and who can benefit from it. In addition, the current landscape of cancer rehabilitation in Canada will be discussed and the need for advocacy to increase access to this essential component of cancer care.
DECODING THE RISKS - ALCOHOL, TOBACCO & DRUGS.pdf
Introduction: Substance use education is crucial due to its prevalence and societal impact.
Alcohol Use: Immediate and long-term risks include impaired judgment, health issues, and social consequences.
Tobacco Use: Immediate effects include increased heart rate, while long-term risks encompass cancer and heart disease.
Drug Use: Risks vary depending on the drug type, including health and psychological implications.
Prevention Strategies: Education, healthy coping mechanisms, community support, and policies are vital in preventing substance use.
Harm Reduction Strategies: Safe use practices, medication-assisted treatment, and naloxone availability aim to reduce harm.
Seeking Help for Addiction: Recognizing signs, available treatments, support systems, and resources are essential for recovery.
Personal Stories: Real stories of recovery emphasize hope and resilience.
Interactive Q&A: Engage the audience and encourage discussion.
Conclusion: Recap key points and emphasize the importance of awareness, prevention, and seeking help.
Resources: Provide contact information and links for further support.
The Power of Superfoods and Exercise.pdf
Healthy Eating Habits:
Understanding Nutrition Labels: Teaches how to read and interpret food labels, focusing on serving sizes, calorie intake, and nutrients to limit or include.
Tips for Healthy Eating: Offers practical advice such as incorporating a variety of foods, practicing moderation, staying hydrated, and eating mindfully.
Benefits of Regular Exercise:
Physical Benefits: Discusses how exercise aids in weight management, muscle and bone health, cardiovascular health, and flexibility.
Mental Benefits: Explains the psychological advantages, including stress reduction, improved mood, and better sleep.
Tips for Staying Active:
Encourages consistency, variety in exercises, setting realistic goals, and finding enjoyable activities to maintain motivation.
Maintaining a Balanced Lifestyle:
Integrating Nutrition and Exercise: Suggests meal planning and incorporating physical activity into daily routines.
Monitoring Progress: Recommends tracking food intake and exercise, regular health check-ups, and provides tips for achieving balance, such as getting sufficient sleep, managing stress, and staying socially active.
Luxurious Spa In Ajman Chandrima Massage Center
Chandrima Spa Ajman is one of the leading Massage Center in Ajman, which is open 24 hours exclusively for men. Being one of the most affordable Spa in Ajman, we offer Body to Body massage, Kerala Massage, Malayali Massage, Indian Massage, Pakistani Massage Russian massage, Thai massage, Swedish massage, Hot Stone Massage, Deep Tissue Massage, and many more. Indulge in the ultimate massage experience and book your appointment today. We are confident that you will leave our Massage spa feeling refreshed, rejuvenated, and ready to take on the world.
Visit : https://massagespaajman.com/
Call : 052 987 1315
MYASTHENIA GRAVIS POWER POINT PRESENTATION
Myasthenia gravis is a neurological disease. It affects the grave muscles in our body. Myasthenia gravis affects how the nerves communicate with the muscles. Drooping eyelids and/or double vision are often the first noticeable sign. It is involving the muscles controlling the eyes movement, facial expression, chewing and swallowing. It also effects the muscles neck and lip movement and respiration.
It is a neuromuscular disease characterized by abnormal weakness of voluntary muscles that improved with rest and the administration of anti-cholinesterase drugs.
The person may find difficult to stand, lift objects and speak or swallow. Medications and surgery can help the patient to relieve the symptoms of this lifelong illness.
FACIAL NERVE
The facial nerve, also known as cranial nerve VII, is one of the 12 cranial nerves originating from the brain. It's a mixed nerve, meaning it contains both sensory and motor fibres, and it plays a crucial role in controlling various facial muscles, as well as conveying sensory information from the taste buds on the anterior two-thirds of the tongue.
DRAFT Ventilator Rapid Reference version 2.4.pdf
Ventilator rapid reference for the Zoll Z cvent. Presented for educational purposes only.
Hypotension and role of physiotherapy in it
This particular slides consist of- what is hypotension,what are it's causes and it's effect on body, risk factors, symptoms,complications, diagnosis and role of physiotherapy in it.
This slide is very helpful for physiotherapy students and also for other medical and healthcare students.
Here is the summary of hypotension:
Hypotension, or low blood pressure, is when the pressure of blood circulating in the body is lower than normal or expected. It's only a problem if it negatively impacts the body and causes symptoms. Normal blood pressure is usually between 90/60 mmHg and 120/80 mmHg, but pressures below 90/60 are generally considered hypotensive.
Surface guided deep inspiration breath hold (SG-DIBH) in ultra-hypofractionat...
Cynthia Aristei
Professor
University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital
Italy
practical guide of obesityfinal hyper1د حاتم البيطار القمة اكاديمي 0120238902...
https://www.facebook.com/drhatemnutritiondiploma01005684344/
https://www.facebook.com/hospitaldrhatem/
📞 01202389028
📞 01005684344
#دحاتم_البيطار
https://64a832848a05c.site123.me/
https://64a9fcd1e98aa.site123.me/
#دكتور_حاتم_البيطار
#دحاتم_البيطار
#timodentist
#drhatem_elbitar
#محاضر_طبي
#مكافحة_العدوي
#الزمالة_المصرية
#دكتور_اسنان
#الهرم_الغذائي
#ادارة_المستشفيات
#أقوي_اعتماد_في_مصر
#الغذاء_الصحي
#دبلومة_التغذية
#الغذاء
#دحاتم_البيطار
#الغذاء_والتغذية
📞01005684344
💬 واتس 01202389028
#دكتور_حاتم_البيطار
#دحاتم_البيطار
#timodentist
hatem elbitar
مكافحة العدوي
ادارة المستشفيات
الزمالة المصرية
دكتور اسنان
الهرم الغذائي
ادارة المستشفيات
الغذاء الصحي
دبلومة التغذية
الغذاء
البيطار استشاري
slides
الغذاء والتغذية
📞01005684344
💬 واتس 01202389028
Dr Hatem ElBitar
د حاتم البيطار
أستشاري وجراح أسنان
زميل الزمالة المصرية
محاضر ادارة المستشفيات ومكافحة العدوى
01005684344
#دحاتم_البيطار
http://bit.ly/2xzMIlo
https://64a832848a05c.site123.me/
https://64a9fcd1e98aa.site123.me/
https://daalacademy.com/instructor/drhatemelbitar/
一比一原版(USF毕业证)旧金山大学毕业证如何办理
USF毕业证offer【微信95270640】《旧金山大学毕业证购买》《如何办理USF毕业证旧金山大学文凭学历》Q微信95270640实体公司，专业可靠，办理毕业证办美国成绩单,做加拿大文凭学历认证,办新西兰学位证，学位证书是什么?《制作旧金山大学毕业证多少钱》《USF学历证书丢了怎么办理》办澳洲文凭认证，办留信网认证（网上可查，实体公司，专业可靠）
专业为留学生办理旧金山大学旧金山大学硕士学位证成绩单【100%存档可查】留学全套申请材料办理。本公司承诺所有毕业证成绩单成品全部按照学校原版工艺对照一比一制作和学校一样的羊皮纸张保证您证书的质量！
如果你回国在学历认证方面有以下难题请联系我们我们将竭诚为你解决认证瓶颈
1所有材料真实但资料不全无法提供完全齐整的原件。【如：成绩单丶毕业证丶回国证明等材料中有遗失的。】
2获得真实的国外最终学历学位但国外本科学历就读经历存在问题或缺陷。【如：国外本科是教育部不承认的或者是联合办学项目教育部没有备案的或者外本科没有正常毕业的。】
3学分转移联合办学等情况复杂不知道怎么整理材料的。时间紧迫自己不清楚递交流程的。
如果你是以上情况之一请联系我们我们将在第一时间内给你免费咨询相关信息。我们将帮助你整理认证所需的各种材料.帮你解决国外学历认证难题。
国外旧金山大学旧金山大学硕士学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询旧金山大学旧金山大学硕士学位证成绩单）；
2开始安排制作旧金山大学毕业证成绩单电子图；
3旧金山大学毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4旧金山大学毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5旧金山大学成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）。头贼脑的倒也逗人喜爱日上三竿时山娃总爱窜进自家瓜棚里跟小伙伴们坐着聊天聊着聊着便忍不住往瓜田里逡巡一番抱起一只硕大的西瓜用石刀劈开抑或用拳头砸开每人抱起一大块就啃啃得满嘴满脸猴屁股般的红艳大家一个劲地指着对方吃吃地笑瓜裂得古怪奇形怪状却丝毫不影响瓜味甜丝丝的满嘴生津遍地都是瓜横七竖八的活像掷满了一地的大石块摘走二三只爷爷是断然发现不了的即便发现爷爷也不恼反而教山娃辨认孰熟孰嫩孰甜孰淡名义上是护瓜吃
Bath patient Fundamental of Nursing.pptx
This is presentation about how to bath a patient.
It is a fundamental of nursing.
CANSA support - Caring for Cancer Patients' Caregivers
International Cancer Survivors Day is celebrated during June, placing the spotlight not only on cancer survivors, but also their caregivers.
CANSA has compiled a list of tips and guidelines of support:
https://cansa.org.za/who-cares-for-cancer-patients-caregivers/
Exploring the Benefits of Binaural Hearing: Why Two Hearing Aids Are Better T...
Exploring the Benefits of Binaural Hearing: Why Two Hearing Aids Are Better T...Ear Solutions (ESPL)
Binaural hearing using two hearing aids instead of one offers numerous advantages, including improved sound localization, enhanced sound quality, better speech understanding in noise, reduced listening effort, and greater overall satisfaction. By leveraging the brain’s natural ability to process sound from both ears, binaural hearing aids provide a more balanced, clear, and comfortable hearing experience. If you or a loved one is considering hearing aids, consult with a hearing care professional at Ear Solutions hearing aid clinic in Mumbai to explore the benefits of binaural hearing and determine the best solution for your hearing needs. Embracing binaural hearing can lead to a richer, more engaging auditory experience and significantly improve your quality of life.
Champions of Health Spotlight On Leaders Shaping Germany's Healthcare.pdf
This edition features a handful of Champions of Health: Spotlight On Leaders Shaping Germany's Healthcare that are leading us into a better future.
Know Latest Hiranandani Hospital Powai News.pdf
As Mumbai's premier kidney transplant and donation center, L H Hiranandani Hospital Powai is not just a medical facility; it's a beacon of hope where cutting-edge science meets compassionate care, transforming lives and redefining the standards of kidney health in India.
Professional Secrecy: Forensic Medicine Lecture
Professional Secrecy: Forensic Medicine Lecture , Medical jurisprudence
Recently uploaded (20)
chatgptfornlp-230314021506-2f03f614.pdf. 21506-2f03f614.pdf
chatgptfornlp-230314021506-2f03f614.pdf. 21506-2f03f614.pdf
Surface guided deep inspiration breath hold (SG-DIBH) in ultra-hypofractionat...
Surface guided deep inspiration breath hold (SG-DIBH) in ultra-hypofractionat...
practical guide of obesityfinal hyper1د حاتم البيطار القمة اكاديمي 0120238902...
practical guide of obesityfinal hyper1د حاتم البيطار القمة اكاديمي 0120238902...
CANSA support - Caring for Cancer Patients' Caregivers
CANSA support - Caring for Cancer Patients' Caregivers
Exploring the Benefits of Binaural Hearing: Why Two Hearing Aids Are Better T...
Exploring the Benefits of Binaural Hearing: Why Two Hearing Aids Are Better T...
Champions of Health Spotlight On Leaders Shaping Germany's Healthcare.pdf
Champions of Health Spotlight On Leaders Shaping Germany's Healthcare.pdf
Research in Hospital
- 1. SIVARAJRAMAN Pegawai Farmasi U44 Introduction to ResearchResearch
- 2. RESEARCH What are your feelings about doing research? excited full of dread fearful curious angry ready for it to be over?!
- 3. Why RESEARCH? One study “says” to do one thing; another study says that I should do the opposite Not sure which is better? Something is not right? Curious? Finding solutions?
- 4. BUT, I NEVER did research before?
- 5. …really?
- 6. Why get EXCITED with RESEARCH? “The essence of all research originates in CURIOSITY - a desire to find out how and why things happen”
- 7. Gaining new knowledge to improve pt. care Evidence based practice = decision making Expands nursing IMPORTANCE of RESEARCH?
- 8. Involves decision making - what methods will help to answer a research question? Is flexible - multiple possibilities, each with its own strengths/weaknesses Systemic Is a circular process INTRODUCTION to RESEARCH
- 9. What do I want to know? Does anyone else know anything about this? I’ll make an educated guess Here’s what I’m going to do to try to answer my question. INTRODUCTION to RESEARCH
- 10. I’ll try to make sense out of all this info I’ve collected. What did I find? Was my hunch supported? What do I want to know now? INTRODUCTION to RESEARCH
- 12. Nurses Job Satisfaction •Overworked? •Stress? •Poor quality of life? •No motivation? •Affects performance? •Want a change? A Research Question
- 13. Defining the problem (area of research) Area where knowledge can be advanced Review related literature Propose research question 1. IDENTIFY RESEARCH AREA
- 14. 1. IDENTIFY RESEARCH AREA
- 15. MOST IMPORTANT Study Population Design Sampling Plan Define how will data be measured/collected Pilot Study? 2. RESEARCH DESIGN
- 16. SETTING Location of the study Will affect the findings SAMPLING Choosing/ selecting subjects Must be representative of the population 2. RESEARCH DESIGN
- 17. Data Collection - according to plan Organization of the data May be the longest phase of the research process Systemic 3. DATA COLLECTION
- 18. Interpret findings Draw conclusions Hypothesis is supported or rejected? How best to utilize findings? New question formulated? 4. DATA ANALYSIS
- 19. Share findings with colleagues May report findings in journal articles, oral presentations, poster presentations Utilize findings - use in nursing practice 5. PUBLISH & SHARE
- 21. RESEARCH TYPES
- 22. Researcher manipulates or controls variable(s) and observes effect in other variable(s) New intervention/treatment/practice Evaluates cause and effect relationship EXAMPLE: effectiveness of High dose Vitamin C for wound healing EXPERIMENTAL
- 23. Characterizing percentage or amount of cases/ factors Can be based on social demography EXAMPLE • percentage of poorly referred cases from clinics • Percentage of patients’ with good hand hygiene • carers’ knowledge on management of bed sore PREVALENCE
- 24. CROSS SECTIONAL Snapshot To investigate for links between variables example: • carers’ knowledge on management of bed sore
- 25. Relationships between variables at least 2 variables for the same group of individuals EXAMPLE • correlation between age and nurses’ grades with knowledge on Medication Error Reporting • Relationship between patient education level and AOR CORRELATION
- 26. Nursing problems - errors, knowledge, job satisfaction, quality of life Patient demography - treatment failure, poor wound healing, poor compliance, satisfaction with treatment Factors - Factors for AOR DC, default, contamination Disease - prevalence, risk factors, outcome IDEAS?
- 27. Find questions / problems Find for available evidences Design the research Try out? Ask for help HOW TO START