Research Evaluation WorksheetPSYCH610 Version 12Universit.docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
0 likes•2 views
Research Evaluation Worksheet PSYCH/610 Version 1 2 University of Phoenix Material Research Evaluation Worksheet Title: Full Article Reference (APA style): Abstract Introduction a. Is the need for the study clearly stated in the introduction? Explain by using information presented in the literature review. b. What is the research hypothesis or question? c. What are the variables of interest (independent and dependent variables)? d. How are the variables operationally defined? Method a. Sample Size (Total): ________________ Size Per Group/Cell: _______________ b. Were the methods and procedures described so that the study could be replicated without further information? What information, if any, would you need to replicate or reproduce this study? Participants a. How were participants selected and recruited? b. Were subjects randomly selected? c. Were there any biases in sampling? Explain d. Were the samples appropriate for the population to which the researcher wished to generalize? e. What are the characteristics of the sample populations? Research Design (check which design applies) _______ Single group, time series study _______ Multiple baseline (sequential) design: ______________ _______ Single group, no measurement _______ Single group with measurement: Pre ______ During _____ Post _____ _______ Two groups classic experimental versus control group, randomly assigned _______ (quasi-experimental) two groups experimental versus control group, not randomly assigned _______ Correlation research, not manipulated, degree of relationship _______ Descriptive research (qualitative study) _______ Natural observation _______ Analytical research _______ Interview research _______ Historical study _______ Survey research _______ Legal study _______ Ethnography research _______ Policy analysis _______ Fieldwork research _______ Evaluation study _______ Phenomenology _______ Grounded theory _______ Protocol analysis (collection and analysis of verbatim reports) _______ Case study, no measurement _______ Case study, with measurement: Pre _________ During _______ Post _________ _______ Developmental research _______ Longitudinal (same group of subjects over period of time) _______ Cross-sectional (subjects from different age groups compared) _______ Cross-sequential (subjects from different age groups, shorter period of time) _______ Correlation, more than two groups: control, treatment, and other treatment comparisons _______ Factorial design, two or more groups: other treatment differences, no untreated controls _______ Two or more dependent variables (MANOVA) _______ Other design: __________________________________________________________ Consider the Following Questions: a. Was a control group used? Yes ______ No ______ If yes, complete b, c, and d below. b. Was the “control” method for the study appropriate? c. What variable was being controlled for? d. In the case of ...
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Critical Analysis of Research ArticleSelect a research.docx
Critical Analysis of Research Article
Select a research article of interest to you, preferably related to your Research Proposal, and
use the Research Evaluation Worksheet to analyze the article.
Make sure you fill in the research evaluation work sheet!
You can use this information to help you form the literature review section of your research proposal.
My research proposal is:
Research Hypothesis
There is a positive correlation between having police officers in schools and reduced school violence compared to schools that do not have police officers in them.
Null hypothesis
There is no statistical significant difference between having police officers in schools and reduced school violence compared to schools that do not have police officers in them.
Research Evaluation Worksheet
Title:
Full Article Reference (APA style):
Abstract
Introduction
a. Is the need for the study clearly stated in the introduction? Explain by using information presented in the literature review.
b. What is the research hypothesis or question?
c. What are the variables of interest (independent and dependent variables)?
d. How are the variables operationally defined?
Method
a. Sample Size (Total): ________________
Size Per Group/Cell: _______________
b. Were the methods and procedures described so that the study could be replicated without further information?
What information, if any, would you need to replicate or reproduce this study?
Participants
a. How were participants selected and recruited?
b. Were subjects randomly selected?
c. Were there any biases in sampling? Explain
d. Were the samples appropriate for the population to which the researcher wished to generalize?
e. What are the characteristics of the sample populations?
Research Design (check which design applies)
_______ Single group, time series study
_______ Multiple baseline (sequential) design: ______________
_______ Single group, no measurement
_______ Single group with measurement: Pre ______ During _____ Post _____
_______ Two groups classic experimental versus control group, randomly assigned
_______ (quasi-experimental) two groups experimental versus control group,
not randomly assigned
_______ Correlation research, not manipulated, degree of relationship
_______ Descriptive research (qualitative study)
_______ Natural observation
_______ Analytical research
_______ Interview research
_______ Historical study
_______ Survey research
_______ Legal study
_______ Ethnography research
_______ Policy analysis
_______ Fieldwork research
_______ Evaluation study
_______ Phenomenology
_______ Grounded theory
_______ Protocol analysis (collection and analysis of verbatim reports)
_______ Case study, no measurement
_______ Case study, with measurement: Pre _________ During _______ Post _________
_______ Developmental research
_______ Longitudinal (same group of subj.
Critical Analysis of Research Article (Team Assignment)· ·.docx
Critical Analysis of Research Article (Team Assignment)
·
· Due Jan 11
Read the article provided by your instructor, and discuss it with your Learning Team. Discuss the research question posed, the authors' hypotheses, the research methodology, and the statistical concepts used. Consider the implications of the study. How did the authors interpret the results? Discuss the meaning and importance of the study.
Create a list of questions for those areas you know little about, and save these questions for discussion in the classroom. Include statistical questions, concepts, terminology, or anything that may be confusing to you.
Complete the Research Evaluation Form provided. The completed form--one per Learning Team--and the list of questions are due this week.
Note. There may be questions you are not able to answer at this time, but do your best. Confer with your Learning Team for clarification and assistance.
Research Evaluation Form
CCMH/525 Version 2
1
University of Phoenix Material
Research Evaluation Form
Use this form for both your individual and Learning Team article reviews.
Name(s): ______________________________________________
Quantitative study: __________
Qualitative study: _____________
Location of Researcher’s Observation or Experiment
none _________ home ________ clinic _________ lab __________
residential facility ________ school _________ hospital _________ other __________
Were children involved? Yes _____ No ______ If your answer is yes, how many? _________
Introduction
Research hypothesis or research questions/problem behaviors: ________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Operational definitions:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Consider the following questions:
Is the need for the study clearly stated in the introduction?
_____________________________________________________________________________
Were the research questions and hypothesis clearly stated? Note that research questions are often presented implicitly within a description of the purpose of the study section.
Review of literature as relevant to the study: _________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Research Evaluation FormCCMH525 Version 32University of.docx
Research Evaluation Form
CCMH/525 Version 3
2
University of Phoenix Material
Research Evaluation Form
Use this form for both your individual and Learning Team article reviews.
Name(s): ______________________________________________
Quantitative study: __________
Qualitative study: _____________
Location of Researcher’s Observation or Experiment
None _________ Home ________ Clinic _________ Lab __________
Residential facility _________ School _________ Hospital _________ Other __________
Were children involved? Yes _____ No ______ If your answer is yes, how many? _________
Introduction
Research hypothesis or research questions/problem behaviors: ________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Operational definitions:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Consider the following questions:
Is the need for the study clearly stated in the introduction?
_____________________________________________________________________________
Were the research questions and hypothesis clearly stated? Note that research questions are often presented implicitly within a description of the purpose of the study section.
Review of literature as relevant to the study: _________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Method
Sample size (total): ________________
Size per group or cell: _______________
Consider the following questions:
_______ Were the methods described so that the study could be replicated without further information?
Subjects
_______ Were subject recruitments and selection methods described?
_______ Were subjects randomly selected? Were there any biases in sampling?
_______ Were the samples appropriate for the population to which the researcher wished to generalize?
_______ Were characteristics of the sample adequately described?
_______ Are two or more groups being compared? Are they shown to be comparable on potentially confounding v ...
Research Critique
This document provides an outline for critiquing a research study. It includes sections to evaluate the problem statement, literature review, research design, instruments, data analysis, and conclusions. The critique examines aspects like variable definitions, sampling methods, reliability and validity of tools, appropriate use of statistics, and implications of the findings. The overall goal is to provide a systematic analysis of the strengths and limitations of the research.
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches.pdf
This document provides an overview of quantitative and qualitative research approaches. It defines quantitative research as deductive, using numeric data from large samples to test hypotheses and analyze relationships between variables objectively. Qualitative research is defined as inductive, relying on words from smaller samples to understand participant experiences subjectively and identify themes in the data. The key differences between the two approaches are described in terms of identifying research problems, reviewing literature, specifying research purposes and questions, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting results. The document also discusses research design and types of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods designs.
CHAPTER 8 QUANTITATIVE METHODSWe turn now from the introductio
CHAPTER 8 QUANTITATIVE METHODS
We turn now from the introduction, the purpose, and the questions and hypotheses to the method section of a proposal. This chapter presents essential steps in designing quantitative methods for a research proposal or study, with specific focus on survey and experimental designs. These designs reflect postpositivist philosophical assumptions, as discussed in Chapter 1. For example, determinism suggests that examining the relationships between and among variables is central to answering questions and hypotheses through surveys and experiments. In one case, a researcher might be interested in evaluating whether playing violent video games is associated with higher rates of playground aggression in kids, which is a correlational hypothesis that could be evaluated in a survey design. In another case, a researcher might be interested in evaluating whether violent video game playing causes aggressive behavior, which is a causal hypothesis that is best evaluated by a true experiment. In each case, these quantitative approaches focus on carefully measuring (or experimentally manipulating) a parsimonious set of variables to answer theory-guided research questions and hypotheses. In this chapter, the focus is on the essential components of a method section in proposals for a survey or experimental study.
DEFINING SURVEYS AND EXPERIMENTS
A survey design provides a quantitative description of trends, attitudes, and opinions of a population, or tests for associations among variables of a population, by studying a sample of that population. Survey designs help researchers answer three types of questions: (a) descriptive questions (e.g., What percentage of practicing nurses support the provision of hospital abortion services?); (b) questions about the relationships between variables (e.g., Is there a positive association between endorsement of hospital abortion services and support for implementing hospice care among nurses?); or in cases where a survey design is repeated over time in a longitudinal study; (c) questions about predictive relationships between variables over time (e.g., Does Time 1 endorsement of support for hospital abortion services predict greater Time 2 burnout in nurses?).
An experimental design systematically manipulates one or more variables in order to evaluate how this manipulation impacts an outcome (or outcomes) of interest. Importantly, an experiment isolates the effects of this manipulation by holding all other variables constant. When one group receives a treatment and the other group does not (which is a manipulated variable of interest), the experimenter can isolate whether the treatment and not other factors influence the outcome. For example, a sample of nurses could be randomly assigned to a 3-week expressive writing program (where they write about their deepest thoughts and feelings) or a matched 3-week control writing program (writing about the facts of their daily morning routine) to eval ...
Quantitative research design
This document provides an overview of quantitative research designs that are frequently used in educational research, including experimental, correlational, and survey designs. It defines experimental design and describes different types of experimental designs such as true experiments, quasi-experiments, and factorial designs. It also discusses correlational research design, survey research design, and provides the objectives, characteristics, and steps for each design. Finally, it discusses some common ethical issues for each research design.
Purpose The purpose of exercise is to conduct a detailed, criti.docx
Purpose:
The purpose of exercise is to conduct a
detailed, critical evaluation
of the research design, methods and analysis of a study written up and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Students will be using Wolfer’s (2007) critical questions for evaluating written research to evaluate an article; these questions are provided below.
Article selection tips:
- select an article from a peer-reviewed Sociology Journal
- the article should clearly be written about a study the author conducted
o
a meta-analysis of multiple studies is not appropriate for this assignment
o
secondary data analysis of an existing national data set is OK, but be sure you understand what you are reading
Requirements:
Your evaluation should include
-
All sections 1-5,
-
1 section from 6-10 (based on design in your article), and
-
1 section from 11-12 (based on analysis in your article).
This assignment does not have to be written in essay format. You may organize it by section/chapter number, question number with question text, and then your answer.
APA formatting should be used throughout. Any time your paraphrase or directly quote a source (such as your article), in-text citations should be used. A full APA-formatted reference should be included at the beginning or end of assignment.
Disclaimer
Originality of attachments will be verified by Turnitin. Both you and your instructor will receive the results.
1.Title (3 pts)
1) Is the title specific enough to differentiate it from other related topics?
2) Do subtitles, if present, provide important information regarding the research?
3) Are the main variables expressed in the title?
4) Are the terms in the title easily understood by most people?
5) Does the title avoid any reference to the study’s results?
6) Overall, is this a good title? Why or why not?
2. Ethical Evaluation (2.5 pts)
7) Are the steps the researcher took to honor ethical responsibilities to individuals clear? Are they appropriate? Are they enough?
8) If there were any findings (based on your readings of tables or other means of data presentation) that refuted the researcher’s hypothesis, did he address these findings?
9) If any results were unexpected, did the researcher discuss any explanations for the unexpected effects?
10) Did the researcher adequately acknowledge the limitations of the research?
11) Overall, has the researcher adequately fulfilled his ethical obligations?
3. Literature Review (4 pts)
12) Is the material presented in the literature review relevant to your research interests?
13) Is the special problem area identified in the first paragraph or two of the report?
14) Does the researcher establish the importance of the research problem?
15) Has the researcher been appropriately selective in deciding what studies to include in the literature review?
16) Is the research cited recent?
17) Is the literature re.
Recommended
Critical Analysis of Research ArticleSelect a research.docx
Critical Analysis of Research Article
Select a research article of interest to you, preferably related to your Research Proposal, and
use the Research Evaluation Worksheet to analyze the article.
Make sure you fill in the research evaluation work sheet!
You can use this information to help you form the literature review section of your research proposal.
My research proposal is:
Research Hypothesis
There is a positive correlation between having police officers in schools and reduced school violence compared to schools that do not have police officers in them.
Null hypothesis
There is no statistical significant difference between having police officers in schools and reduced school violence compared to schools that do not have police officers in them.
Research Evaluation Worksheet
Title:
Full Article Reference (APA style):
Abstract
Introduction
a. Is the need for the study clearly stated in the introduction? Explain by using information presented in the literature review.
b. What is the research hypothesis or question?
c. What are the variables of interest (independent and dependent variables)?
d. How are the variables operationally defined?
Method
a. Sample Size (Total): ________________
Size Per Group/Cell: _______________
b. Were the methods and procedures described so that the study could be replicated without further information?
What information, if any, would you need to replicate or reproduce this study?
Participants
a. How were participants selected and recruited?
b. Were subjects randomly selected?
c. Were there any biases in sampling? Explain
d. Were the samples appropriate for the population to which the researcher wished to generalize?
e. What are the characteristics of the sample populations?
Research Design (check which design applies)
_______ Single group, time series study
_______ Multiple baseline (sequential) design: ______________
_______ Single group, no measurement
_______ Single group with measurement: Pre ______ During _____ Post _____
_______ Two groups classic experimental versus control group, randomly assigned
_______ (quasi-experimental) two groups experimental versus control group,
not randomly assigned
_______ Correlation research, not manipulated, degree of relationship
_______ Descriptive research (qualitative study)
_______ Natural observation
_______ Analytical research
_______ Interview research
_______ Historical study
_______ Survey research
_______ Legal study
_______ Ethnography research
_______ Policy analysis
_______ Fieldwork research
_______ Evaluation study
_______ Phenomenology
_______ Grounded theory
_______ Protocol analysis (collection and analysis of verbatim reports)
_______ Case study, no measurement
_______ Case study, with measurement: Pre _________ During _______ Post _________
_______ Developmental research
_______ Longitudinal (same group of subj.
Critical Analysis of Research Article (Team Assignment)· ·.docx
Critical Analysis of Research Article (Team Assignment)
·
· Due Jan 11
Read the article provided by your instructor, and discuss it with your Learning Team. Discuss the research question posed, the authors' hypotheses, the research methodology, and the statistical concepts used. Consider the implications of the study. How did the authors interpret the results? Discuss the meaning and importance of the study.
Create a list of questions for those areas you know little about, and save these questions for discussion in the classroom. Include statistical questions, concepts, terminology, or anything that may be confusing to you.
Complete the Research Evaluation Form provided. The completed form--one per Learning Team--and the list of questions are due this week.
Note. There may be questions you are not able to answer at this time, but do your best. Confer with your Learning Team for clarification and assistance.
Research Evaluation Form
CCMH/525 Version 2
1
University of Phoenix Material
Research Evaluation Form
Use this form for both your individual and Learning Team article reviews.
Name(s): ______________________________________________
Quantitative study: __________
Qualitative study: _____________
Location of Researcher’s Observation or Experiment
none _________ home ________ clinic _________ lab __________
residential facility ________ school _________ hospital _________ other __________
Were children involved? Yes _____ No ______ If your answer is yes, how many? _________
Introduction
Research hypothesis or research questions/problem behaviors: ________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Operational definitions:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Consider the following questions:
Is the need for the study clearly stated in the introduction?
_____________________________________________________________________________
Were the research questions and hypothesis clearly stated? Note that research questions are often presented implicitly within a description of the purpose of the study section.
Review of literature as relevant to the study: _________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Research Evaluation FormCCMH525 Version 32University of.docx
Research Evaluation Form
CCMH/525 Version 3
2
University of Phoenix Material
Research Evaluation Form
Use this form for both your individual and Learning Team article reviews.
Name(s): ______________________________________________
Quantitative study: __________
Qualitative study: _____________
Location of Researcher’s Observation or Experiment
None _________ Home ________ Clinic _________ Lab __________
Residential facility _________ School _________ Hospital _________ Other __________
Were children involved? Yes _____ No ______ If your answer is yes, how many? _________
Introduction
Research hypothesis or research questions/problem behaviors: ________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Operational definitions:
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Consider the following questions:
Is the need for the study clearly stated in the introduction?
_____________________________________________________________________________
Were the research questions and hypothesis clearly stated? Note that research questions are often presented implicitly within a description of the purpose of the study section.
Review of literature as relevant to the study: _________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Method
Sample size (total): ________________
Size per group or cell: _______________
Consider the following questions:
_______ Were the methods described so that the study could be replicated without further information?
Subjects
_______ Were subject recruitments and selection methods described?
_______ Were subjects randomly selected? Were there any biases in sampling?
_______ Were the samples appropriate for the population to which the researcher wished to generalize?
_______ Were characteristics of the sample adequately described?
_______ Are two or more groups being compared? Are they shown to be comparable on potentially confounding v ...
Research Critique
This document provides an outline for critiquing a research study. It includes sections to evaluate the problem statement, literature review, research design, instruments, data analysis, and conclusions. The critique examines aspects like variable definitions, sampling methods, reliability and validity of tools, appropriate use of statistics, and implications of the findings. The overall goal is to provide a systematic analysis of the strengths and limitations of the research.
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches.pdf
This document provides an overview of quantitative and qualitative research approaches. It defines quantitative research as deductive, using numeric data from large samples to test hypotheses and analyze relationships between variables objectively. Qualitative research is defined as inductive, relying on words from smaller samples to understand participant experiences subjectively and identify themes in the data. The key differences between the two approaches are described in terms of identifying research problems, reviewing literature, specifying research purposes and questions, collecting and analyzing data, and reporting results. The document also discusses research design and types of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods designs.
CHAPTER 8 QUANTITATIVE METHODSWe turn now from the introductio
CHAPTER 8 QUANTITATIVE METHODS
We turn now from the introduction, the purpose, and the questions and hypotheses to the method section of a proposal. This chapter presents essential steps in designing quantitative methods for a research proposal or study, with specific focus on survey and experimental designs. These designs reflect postpositivist philosophical assumptions, as discussed in Chapter 1. For example, determinism suggests that examining the relationships between and among variables is central to answering questions and hypotheses through surveys and experiments. In one case, a researcher might be interested in evaluating whether playing violent video games is associated with higher rates of playground aggression in kids, which is a correlational hypothesis that could be evaluated in a survey design. In another case, a researcher might be interested in evaluating whether violent video game playing causes aggressive behavior, which is a causal hypothesis that is best evaluated by a true experiment. In each case, these quantitative approaches focus on carefully measuring (or experimentally manipulating) a parsimonious set of variables to answer theory-guided research questions and hypotheses. In this chapter, the focus is on the essential components of a method section in proposals for a survey or experimental study.
DEFINING SURVEYS AND EXPERIMENTS
A survey design provides a quantitative description of trends, attitudes, and opinions of a population, or tests for associations among variables of a population, by studying a sample of that population. Survey designs help researchers answer three types of questions: (a) descriptive questions (e.g., What percentage of practicing nurses support the provision of hospital abortion services?); (b) questions about the relationships between variables (e.g., Is there a positive association between endorsement of hospital abortion services and support for implementing hospice care among nurses?); or in cases where a survey design is repeated over time in a longitudinal study; (c) questions about predictive relationships between variables over time (e.g., Does Time 1 endorsement of support for hospital abortion services predict greater Time 2 burnout in nurses?).
An experimental design systematically manipulates one or more variables in order to evaluate how this manipulation impacts an outcome (or outcomes) of interest. Importantly, an experiment isolates the effects of this manipulation by holding all other variables constant. When one group receives a treatment and the other group does not (which is a manipulated variable of interest), the experimenter can isolate whether the treatment and not other factors influence the outcome. For example, a sample of nurses could be randomly assigned to a 3-week expressive writing program (where they write about their deepest thoughts and feelings) or a matched 3-week control writing program (writing about the facts of their daily morning routine) to eval ...
Quantitative research design
This document provides an overview of quantitative research designs that are frequently used in educational research, including experimental, correlational, and survey designs. It defines experimental design and describes different types of experimental designs such as true experiments, quasi-experiments, and factorial designs. It also discusses correlational research design, survey research design, and provides the objectives, characteristics, and steps for each design. Finally, it discusses some common ethical issues for each research design.
Purpose The purpose of exercise is to conduct a detailed, criti.docx
Purpose:
The purpose of exercise is to conduct a
detailed, critical evaluation
of the research design, methods and analysis of a study written up and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Students will be using Wolfer’s (2007) critical questions for evaluating written research to evaluate an article; these questions are provided below.
Article selection tips:
- select an article from a peer-reviewed Sociology Journal
- the article should clearly be written about a study the author conducted
o
a meta-analysis of multiple studies is not appropriate for this assignment
o
secondary data analysis of an existing national data set is OK, but be sure you understand what you are reading
Requirements:
Your evaluation should include
-
All sections 1-5,
-
1 section from 6-10 (based on design in your article), and
-
1 section from 11-12 (based on analysis in your article).
This assignment does not have to be written in essay format. You may organize it by section/chapter number, question number with question text, and then your answer.
APA formatting should be used throughout. Any time your paraphrase or directly quote a source (such as your article), in-text citations should be used. A full APA-formatted reference should be included at the beginning or end of assignment.
Disclaimer
Originality of attachments will be verified by Turnitin. Both you and your instructor will receive the results.
1.Title (3 pts)
1) Is the title specific enough to differentiate it from other related topics?
2) Do subtitles, if present, provide important information regarding the research?
3) Are the main variables expressed in the title?
4) Are the terms in the title easily understood by most people?
5) Does the title avoid any reference to the study’s results?
6) Overall, is this a good title? Why or why not?
2. Ethical Evaluation (2.5 pts)
7) Are the steps the researcher took to honor ethical responsibilities to individuals clear? Are they appropriate? Are they enough?
8) If there were any findings (based on your readings of tables or other means of data presentation) that refuted the researcher’s hypothesis, did he address these findings?
9) If any results were unexpected, did the researcher discuss any explanations for the unexpected effects?
10) Did the researcher adequately acknowledge the limitations of the research?
11) Overall, has the researcher adequately fulfilled his ethical obligations?
3. Literature Review (4 pts)
12) Is the material presented in the literature review relevant to your research interests?
13) Is the special problem area identified in the first paragraph or two of the report?
14) Does the researcher establish the importance of the research problem?
15) Has the researcher been appropriately selective in deciding what studies to include in the literature review?
16) Is the research cited recent?
17) Is the literature re.
Assignment 1 Evaluation of a peer-reviewed articlePurpose Th.docx
Assignment 1: Evaluation of a peer-reviewed article
Purpose:
The purpose of exercise is to conduct a
detailed, critical evaluation
of the research design, methods and analysis of a study written up and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Students will be using Wolfer’s (2007) critical questions for evaluating written research to evaluate an article; these questions are provided below.
Article selection tips:
- select an article from a peer-reviewed Sociology Journal
- the article should clearly be written about a study the author conducted
o
a meta-analysis of multiple studies is not appropriate for this assignment
o
secondary data analysis of an existing national data set is OK, but be sure you understand what you are reading
Requirements:
Your evaluation should include
-
All sections 1-5,
-
1 section from 6-10 (based on design in your article), and
-
1 section from 11-12 (based on analysis in your article).
This assignment does not have to be written in essay format. You may organize it by section/chapter number, question number with question text, and then your answer.
APA formatting should be used throughout. Any time your paraphrase or directly quote a source (such as your article), in-text citations should be used. A full APA-formatted reference should be included at the beginning or end of assignment.
Disclaimer
Originality of attachments will be verified by Turnitin. Both you and your instructor will receive the results.
1.Title (3 pts)
1) Is the title specific enough to differentiate it from other related topics?
2) Do subtitles, if present, provide important information regarding the research?
3) Are the main variables expressed in the title?
4) Are the terms in the title easily understood by most people?
5) Does the title avoid any reference to the study’s results?
6) Overall, is this a good title? Why or why not?
2. Ethical Evaluation (2.5 pts)
7) Are the steps the researcher took to honor ethical responsibilities to individuals clear? Are they appropriate? Are they enough?
8) If there were any findings (based on your readings of tables or other means of data presentation) that refuted the researcher’s hypothesis, did he address these findings?
9) If any results were unexpected, did the researcher discuss any explanations for the unexpected effects?
10) Did the researcher adequately acknowledge the limitations of the research?
11) Overall, has the researcher adequately fulfilled his ethical obligations?
3. Literature Review (4 pts)
12) Is the material presented in the literature review relevant to your research interests?
13) Is the special problem area identified in the first paragraph or two of the report?
14) Does the researcher establish the importance of the research problem?
15) Has the researcher been appropriately selective in deciding what studies to include in the literature review?
16) Is.
Critical Appraisal Process for Quantitative ResearchAs you cri.docx
Critical Appraisal Process for Quantitative Research
As you critically appraise studies, follow the steps of the critical appraisal process presented in Box 18-1. These steps occur in sequence, vary in depth, and presume accomplishment of the preceding steps. However, an individual with critical appraisal experience frequently performs multiple steps of this process simultaneously. This section includes the three steps of the research critical appraisal process applied to quantitative studies and provides relevant questions for each step. These questions are not comprehensive but have been selected as a means for stimulating the logical reasoning and analysis necessary for conducting a study review. Persons experienced in the critical appraisal process formulate additional questions as part of their reasoning processes. We cover the identification of the steps or elements of the research process separately because persons who are new to critical appraisal often only conduct this step. The questions for determining the study strengths and weaknesses are covered together because this process occurs simultaneously in the mind of the person conducting the critical appraisal. Evaluation is covered separately because of the increased expertise needed to perform this final step.
Step I: Identifying the Steps of the Quantitative Research Process in Studies
Initial attempts to comprehend research articles are often frustrating because the terminology and stylized manner of the report are unfamiliar. Identification of the steps of the research process in a quantitative study is the first step in critical appraisal. It involves understanding the terms and concepts in the report; identifying study elements; and grasping the nature, significance, and meaning of the study elements. The following guidelines are presented to direct
you in the initial critical appraisal of a quantitative study.
Guidelines for Identifying the Steps of the Quantitative Research Process
The first step involves reviewing the study title and abstract and reading the study from beginning to end (review the key principles in Box 18-2). As you read, address the following questions about the research report: Was the writing style of the report clear and concise? Were the different parts of the research report plainly identified (APA, 2010)? Were relevant terms defined?
You might underline the terms you do not understand and determine their meaning from the glossary at the end of this textbook. Read the article a second time and highlight or underline each step of the quantitative research process. An overview of these steps is presented in Chapter 3. To write a critical appraisal identifying the study steps, you need to identify each step concisely and respond briefly to the following guidelines and questions:
I. Introduction
A. Describe the qualifications of the authors to conduct the study, such as research expertise, clinical experience, and educational preparation. Doctoral .
Assignment 1 Evaluation of a peer-reviewed articlePurpose The .docx
The document provides guidance for students to evaluate a peer-reviewed journal article. It outlines the requirements, which include evaluating sections on the article's title, ethics, literature review, methodology, sampling, and results/analysis. Students must choose one section from methodology (e.g. experiments, surveys) and one from results (e.g. qualitative, quantitative analysis) to focus their evaluation. Guidelines are provided on what to assess for each section, with over 90 questions total. Examples of budgets for a proposed healthcare facility expansion are also provided, including revenue, expenses and financial statements projections to aid planning.
critica apprasial (1).pptx
This document provides guidelines for critically appraising a research article or study. It outlines key areas to examine such as the title, abstract, research problem and questions, objectives, hypotheses, study design, population, data collection, methodology, sampling methods, controls, ethical considerations, and conclusions. Critically evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of a study is essential to determine how its findings should influence decision making and if the results are valid and consistent with other research. The critical appraisal process is a fundamental skill for assessing clinical research quality and relevance.
Anatomy of a meta analysis i like
Evaluates a meta analysis of family therapy interventions for families facing physical illness.
The slide presentation and article is discussed in greater detail at http://jcoynester.wordpress.com/2013/08/12/interventions-for-the-family-in-chronic-illness-a-meta-analysis-i-like/
Developing a Systematic Review Protocol
A systematic review (SR) is a rigorous and organized method to synthesize
the evidence from multiple studies on a particular research question or topic.
The purpose of a systematic review is to identify, appraise, and summarize all
available evidence relevant to a specific research question in a transparent
and replicable manner.
It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of academic literature
concerning a particular research question of topic.
This presentation explores the steps nee
Health Evidence™ Critical Appraisal Tool for Economic Evaluations (Sample Ans...
Health Evidence™ Critical Appraisal Tool for Economic Evaluations (Sample Ans...The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools
This sample answer sheet corresponds with the ninth webinar in the Online Journal Club series, “What are public health interventions’ return on investment?"
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.Chapter Eight Quantitative Methods
This document provides an outline and guidelines for developing quantitative research methods plans for surveys and experiments. It defines key components and considerations for survey design, experimental design, developing instrumentation, identifying variables, sampling procedures, data analysis, and interpreting results. Checklists are provided to guide the planning of surveys and experiments. Potential threats to validity are also discussed.
Appraisal Tool for Evaluating Experimental and Designs.docx
This document provides a 10-point framework for appraising experimental and quasi-experimental research designs. It outlines key aspects of the research that should be evaluated such as the literature review, hypotheses, research design and methodology, sampling approach, intervention, outcome variables, ethical considerations, results, and generalizability. The framework is intended to guide appraisers in conducting a thorough evaluation of the research methodology, execution, and implications of experimental and quasi-experimental studies.
MSN5300 Advanced Nursing Inquiry.docx
MSN5300: Advanced Nursing Inquiry, Research, and Evidence-Based Practice Team:____________
Critical Appraisal Worksheet for Group Project 2, Part b
Elements of Appraisal
Discussion
Study Design
Was the study a qualitative or quantitative design? Explain.
Practice Problem
State the practice problem/issue that is the focus of the study.
How does this practice problem/issue affect
your nursing practice?
Study Purpose
State the purpose of the study.
Discuss whether this study was feasible to conduct in terms of money commitment; the researchers' expertise; availability of subjects, and ethical considerations.
Review of Literature
Was the literature review organized to show the progressive development of evidence from previous research?
Was a clear, concise summary presented of the current empirical and theoretical knowledge in the area of the study?
Did the literature review summary identify what was known and not known about the research problem? Did it logically direct the research purpose?
Theoretical Framework
Is a conceptual model or theoretical framework used? If so, is it presented with clarity? Does it adequately explain the phenomenon of concern?
Is the framework linked to the research purpose? If not, would another framework fit more logically with the study?
If a proposition or relationship from a theory is to be tested, is the proposition clearly identified and linked to the study hypothesis?
Research Question(s) and Hpothesis(es)
What is the research question? Is it clearly stated?
Does the research question match the purpose of the study?
What is the research hypothesis? Is it clearly stated?
Does the hypothesis match the purpose of the study?
Formulate a null hypothesis for this study.
Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the concepts and relationships (propositions) in the framework? Explain.
Variables
List all research variables with corresponding levels of measurement on the NOIR scale.
Do variables represent the concepts identified in the framework?
How is each study variable defined (both conceptually
and operationally)?
Are conceptual definitions of variables consistent with operational definitions?
Study Design
What was the design was used in the study? Was it the most appropriate design to answer the study question? Explain.
Was the design logically linked to the sampling method and statistical analyses?
Did the design provide a means to examine
all objectives, questions, or hypotheses?
If there was an intervention (treatment) in the study:
· what was the intervention? was it clearly described?
· was the treatment appropriate for examining the study purpose and hypotheses?
· did the study framework explain the links between the treatment (independent variab.
PR1 - Lesson 3.pptx
This document discusses and compares quantitative and qualitative research methods. It provides definitions and characteristics of each type of research. Quantitative research uses statistical tools and measurements to test hypotheses, while qualitative research explores phenomena through interviews, observations and narratives to develop theories. Both approaches can be useful depending on the goals and nature of the research being conducted.
(1) Critique Template for a Qualitative StudyNURS 6052Week.docx
(1): Critique Template for a Qualitative Study
NURS 6052
Week 6 Assignment: Application: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies (due by Day 7 of Week 7)
Date:
Your name:
Article reference (in APA style):
URL:
What is a critique? Simply stated, a critique is a critical analysis undertaken for some purpose. Nurses critique research for three main reasons: to improve their practice, to broaden their understanding, and to provide a base for the conduct of a study.
When the purpose is to improve practice, nurses must give special consideration to questions such as these:
· Are the research findings appropriate to my practice setting and situation?
· What further research or pilot studies need to be done, if any, before incorporating findings into practice to assure both safety and effectiveness?
· How might a proposed change in practice trigger changes in other aspects of practice?
To help you synthesize your learning throughout this course and prepare you to utilize research in your practice, you will be critiquing a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods research study of your choice.
If the article is unavailable in a full-text version through the Walden University Library, you must e-mail the article as a PDF or Word attachment to your Instructor.
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE
1. Research Issue and Purpose
What is the research question or issue of the referenced study? What is its purpose? (Sometimes ONLY the purpose is stated clearly and the question must be inferred from the introductory discussion of the purpose.)
2. Researcher Pre-understandings
Does the article include a discussion of the researcher’s pre-understandings? What does the article disclose about the researcher’s professional and personal perspectives on the research problem?
3. Literature Review
What is the quality of the literature review? Is the literature review current, relevant? Is there evidence that the author critiqued the literature or merely reported it without critique? Is there an integrated summary of the current knowledge base regarding the research problem, or does the literature review contain opinion or anecdotal articles without any synthesis or summary of the whole? (Sometimes the literature review is incorporated into the introductory section without being explicitly identified.)
4. Theoretical or Conceptual Framework
Is a theoretical or conceptual framework identified? If so, what is it? Is it a nursing framework or one drawn from another discipline? (Sometimes there is no explicitly identified theoretical or conceptual framework; in addition, many “nursing” research studies draw on a “borrowed” framework, e.g., stress, medical pathology, etc.)
5. Participants
Who were the participants? Is the setting or study group adequately described? Is the setting appropriate for the research question? What type of sampling strategy was used? Was it appropriate? Was the sample size adequate? Did t ...
Quantitative Method
This document provides guidance on developing quantitative research methods sections for surveys and experiments. It outlines key components to include such as defining the population and sampling procedure, describing the survey instrumentation and plans for validation, identifying the variables and data analysis steps, and interpreting results. For surveys, it recommends specifying the survey format, population, sampling strategy, validity/reliability of instrumentation, and statistical analysis plan. For experiments, it suggests defining the variables, participants, materials, procedures, measures, pre/post tests, and statistical analyses for hypothesis testing and interpreting findings.
Mixed methods research
This document provides an overview of mixed methods research. It discusses the three main types of research designs: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. It explains the differences between qualitative and quantitative research in terms of purpose, group studied, variables, data collection/analysis, and results. The document also discusses pragmatism as the philosophy behind mixed methods research and reasons for combining methods. It outlines various ways that qualitative and quantitative methods can be mixed, such as through timing, weighting, and mixing of data. The document concludes by describing six main mixed methods designs and recommending further readings on the topic.
Language and Literature Research (7 of 16)
Language and Literature Research (7 of 16)
Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET) Reviewer for Majorship-English Secondary.
Chapter Six The Purpose Statement
This document provides guidance on writing purpose statements for qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research studies. It defines what a purpose statement is and its key components. Examples are given for purpose statements in qualitative studies like phenomenology, case studies, and ethnographies. Examples are also given for quantitative studies like surveys and experiments. Finally, examples are provided for different mixed methods designs, including convergent, explanatory sequential, and exploratory sequential designs. The document offers scripts and guidelines for writing effective purpose statements for different research approaches.
Methodology and IRB/URR
Dr. Lani discusses all aspects of the dissertation methodology, including: selecting a survey instrument, population, reliability, validity, data analysis plan, and IRB/URR considerations.
Systematic and Scoping Reviews.pptx
Systematic reviews, rapid reviews, and scoping reviews are all types of literature reviews but differ in their methods and objectives. Systematic reviews have a narrow question and use comprehensive searches and selection criteria to minimize bias. They analyze available studies to answer a specific question. Rapid reviews have time constraints and omit some systematic review stages to provide timely information. Scoping reviews have broader questions and identify the nature and scope of research on a topic, including identifying gaps. They involve iterative searches and selection and usually do not critically appraise studies.
The Research Process.ppt
The document outlines the key aspects of the research process, including the purposes of research such as exploration, description, and explanation. It then discusses the essential elements of research including clearly defining the problem, reviewing existing literature, selecting an appropriate research design and data collection techniques, gathering and analyzing data, and presenting implications and conclusions. The different types of research designs like cross-sectional, longitudinal, time series, and panel designs are also summarized.
critical appraisal ppt.pptx
The critical appraisal process examines research to judge its validity and relevance. It involves summarizing key aspects of research articles like the introduction, methods, results and discussion sections. Important tools for appraisal include the PICO method to assess the research question, and CASP checklists tailored to different study designs. Proper appraisal helps identify clinically relevant papers and supports evidence-based decision making.
Ethical Case Study 2Gloria is a housekeeper in an independent li.docx
Ethical Case Study 2
Gloria is a housekeeper in an independent living community. While walking through a hallway, she noticed the door of a resident’s apartment was left open, which was unusual. She stepped in to check on Louis, and quickly realized that he was on the phone in his living room. As she turned to leave, she over heard him saying that he had stopped taking all of his medications because he was ready to die. She could tell that the person that he was speaking with was trying to reason with him. Gloria knows that Louis has a very loving and involved daughter that visits him every Saturday. She left the room determined that she would tell his daughter what she heard when she saw her on Saturday.
You have to answer all the questions below
What issues are facing Gloria? Discuss the possible ethical principles at play and your recommendation to Gloria.
Hint: Confidentiality, Beneficence, Self-determination
.
Ethical consideration is important in nursing practice, especial.docx
The document discusses the importance of considering a patient's ethnic and cultural background when providing nursing care, especially for patients with type 2 diabetes. It describes a Hispanic patient who was hospitalized for complications of type 2 diabetes and a chronic foot ulcer. His cultural beliefs about diabetes and fatalism impacted his self-management. The nurse considered his ethnicity and ensured culturally competent care by understanding his perspectives on diabetes causation and remedies.
More Related Content
Similar to Research Evaluation WorksheetPSYCH610 Version 12Universit.docx
Assignment 1 Evaluation of a peer-reviewed articlePurpose Th.docx
Assignment 1: Evaluation of a peer-reviewed article
Purpose:
The purpose of exercise is to conduct a
detailed, critical evaluation
of the research design, methods and analysis of a study written up and published in a peer-reviewed journal. Students will be using Wolfer’s (2007) critical questions for evaluating written research to evaluate an article; these questions are provided below.
Article selection tips:
- select an article from a peer-reviewed Sociology Journal
- the article should clearly be written about a study the author conducted
o
a meta-analysis of multiple studies is not appropriate for this assignment
o
secondary data analysis of an existing national data set is OK, but be sure you understand what you are reading
Requirements:
Your evaluation should include
-
All sections 1-5,
-
1 section from 6-10 (based on design in your article), and
-
1 section from 11-12 (based on analysis in your article).
This assignment does not have to be written in essay format. You may organize it by section/chapter number, question number with question text, and then your answer.
APA formatting should be used throughout. Any time your paraphrase or directly quote a source (such as your article), in-text citations should be used. A full APA-formatted reference should be included at the beginning or end of assignment.
Disclaimer
Originality of attachments will be verified by Turnitin. Both you and your instructor will receive the results.
1.Title (3 pts)
1) Is the title specific enough to differentiate it from other related topics?
2) Do subtitles, if present, provide important information regarding the research?
3) Are the main variables expressed in the title?
4) Are the terms in the title easily understood by most people?
5) Does the title avoid any reference to the study’s results?
6) Overall, is this a good title? Why or why not?
2. Ethical Evaluation (2.5 pts)
7) Are the steps the researcher took to honor ethical responsibilities to individuals clear? Are they appropriate? Are they enough?
8) If there were any findings (based on your readings of tables or other means of data presentation) that refuted the researcher’s hypothesis, did he address these findings?
9) If any results were unexpected, did the researcher discuss any explanations for the unexpected effects?
10) Did the researcher adequately acknowledge the limitations of the research?
11) Overall, has the researcher adequately fulfilled his ethical obligations?
3. Literature Review (4 pts)
12) Is the material presented in the literature review relevant to your research interests?
13) Is the special problem area identified in the first paragraph or two of the report?
14) Does the researcher establish the importance of the research problem?
15) Has the researcher been appropriately selective in deciding what studies to include in the literature review?
16) Is.
Critical Appraisal Process for Quantitative ResearchAs you cri.docx
Critical Appraisal Process for Quantitative Research
As you critically appraise studies, follow the steps of the critical appraisal process presented in Box 18-1. These steps occur in sequence, vary in depth, and presume accomplishment of the preceding steps. However, an individual with critical appraisal experience frequently performs multiple steps of this process simultaneously. This section includes the three steps of the research critical appraisal process applied to quantitative studies and provides relevant questions for each step. These questions are not comprehensive but have been selected as a means for stimulating the logical reasoning and analysis necessary for conducting a study review. Persons experienced in the critical appraisal process formulate additional questions as part of their reasoning processes. We cover the identification of the steps or elements of the research process separately because persons who are new to critical appraisal often only conduct this step. The questions for determining the study strengths and weaknesses are covered together because this process occurs simultaneously in the mind of the person conducting the critical appraisal. Evaluation is covered separately because of the increased expertise needed to perform this final step.
Step I: Identifying the Steps of the Quantitative Research Process in Studies
Initial attempts to comprehend research articles are often frustrating because the terminology and stylized manner of the report are unfamiliar. Identification of the steps of the research process in a quantitative study is the first step in critical appraisal. It involves understanding the terms and concepts in the report; identifying study elements; and grasping the nature, significance, and meaning of the study elements. The following guidelines are presented to direct
you in the initial critical appraisal of a quantitative study.
Guidelines for Identifying the Steps of the Quantitative Research Process
The first step involves reviewing the study title and abstract and reading the study from beginning to end (review the key principles in Box 18-2). As you read, address the following questions about the research report: Was the writing style of the report clear and concise? Were the different parts of the research report plainly identified (APA, 2010)? Were relevant terms defined?
You might underline the terms you do not understand and determine their meaning from the glossary at the end of this textbook. Read the article a second time and highlight or underline each step of the quantitative research process. An overview of these steps is presented in Chapter 3. To write a critical appraisal identifying the study steps, you need to identify each step concisely and respond briefly to the following guidelines and questions:
I. Introduction
A. Describe the qualifications of the authors to conduct the study, such as research expertise, clinical experience, and educational preparation. Doctoral .
Assignment 1 Evaluation of a peer-reviewed articlePurpose The .docx
The document provides guidance for students to evaluate a peer-reviewed journal article. It outlines the requirements, which include evaluating sections on the article's title, ethics, literature review, methodology, sampling, and results/analysis. Students must choose one section from methodology (e.g. experiments, surveys) and one from results (e.g. qualitative, quantitative analysis) to focus their evaluation. Guidelines are provided on what to assess for each section, with over 90 questions total. Examples of budgets for a proposed healthcare facility expansion are also provided, including revenue, expenses and financial statements projections to aid planning.
critica apprasial (1).pptx
This document provides guidelines for critically appraising a research article or study. It outlines key areas to examine such as the title, abstract, research problem and questions, objectives, hypotheses, study design, population, data collection, methodology, sampling methods, controls, ethical considerations, and conclusions. Critically evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of a study is essential to determine how its findings should influence decision making and if the results are valid and consistent with other research. The critical appraisal process is a fundamental skill for assessing clinical research quality and relevance.
Anatomy of a meta analysis i like
Evaluates a meta analysis of family therapy interventions for families facing physical illness.
The slide presentation and article is discussed in greater detail at http://jcoynester.wordpress.com/2013/08/12/interventions-for-the-family-in-chronic-illness-a-meta-analysis-i-like/
Developing a Systematic Review Protocol
A systematic review (SR) is a rigorous and organized method to synthesize
the evidence from multiple studies on a particular research question or topic.
The purpose of a systematic review is to identify, appraise, and summarize all
available evidence relevant to a specific research question in a transparent
and replicable manner.
It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of academic literature
concerning a particular research question of topic.
This presentation explores the steps nee
Health Evidence™ Critical Appraisal Tool for Economic Evaluations (Sample Ans...
Health Evidence™ Critical Appraisal Tool for Economic Evaluations (Sample Ans...The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools
This sample answer sheet corresponds with the ninth webinar in the Online Journal Club series, “What are public health interventions’ return on investment?"
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.Chapter Eight Quantitative Methods
This document provides an outline and guidelines for developing quantitative research methods plans for surveys and experiments. It defines key components and considerations for survey design, experimental design, developing instrumentation, identifying variables, sampling procedures, data analysis, and interpreting results. Checklists are provided to guide the planning of surveys and experiments. Potential threats to validity are also discussed.
Appraisal Tool for Evaluating Experimental and Designs.docx
This document provides a 10-point framework for appraising experimental and quasi-experimental research designs. It outlines key aspects of the research that should be evaluated such as the literature review, hypotheses, research design and methodology, sampling approach, intervention, outcome variables, ethical considerations, results, and generalizability. The framework is intended to guide appraisers in conducting a thorough evaluation of the research methodology, execution, and implications of experimental and quasi-experimental studies.
MSN5300 Advanced Nursing Inquiry.docx
MSN5300: Advanced Nursing Inquiry, Research, and Evidence-Based Practice Team:____________
Critical Appraisal Worksheet for Group Project 2, Part b
Elements of Appraisal
Discussion
Study Design
Was the study a qualitative or quantitative design? Explain.
Practice Problem
State the practice problem/issue that is the focus of the study.
How does this practice problem/issue affect
your nursing practice?
Study Purpose
State the purpose of the study.
Discuss whether this study was feasible to conduct in terms of money commitment; the researchers' expertise; availability of subjects, and ethical considerations.
Review of Literature
Was the literature review organized to show the progressive development of evidence from previous research?
Was a clear, concise summary presented of the current empirical and theoretical knowledge in the area of the study?
Did the literature review summary identify what was known and not known about the research problem? Did it logically direct the research purpose?
Theoretical Framework
Is a conceptual model or theoretical framework used? If so, is it presented with clarity? Does it adequately explain the phenomenon of concern?
Is the framework linked to the research purpose? If not, would another framework fit more logically with the study?
If a proposition or relationship from a theory is to be tested, is the proposition clearly identified and linked to the study hypothesis?
Research Question(s) and Hpothesis(es)
What is the research question? Is it clearly stated?
Does the research question match the purpose of the study?
What is the research hypothesis? Is it clearly stated?
Does the hypothesis match the purpose of the study?
Formulate a null hypothesis for this study.
Were the objectives, questions, or hypotheses logically linked to the concepts and relationships (propositions) in the framework? Explain.
Variables
List all research variables with corresponding levels of measurement on the NOIR scale.
Do variables represent the concepts identified in the framework?
How is each study variable defined (both conceptually
and operationally)?
Are conceptual definitions of variables consistent with operational definitions?
Study Design
What was the design was used in the study? Was it the most appropriate design to answer the study question? Explain.
Was the design logically linked to the sampling method and statistical analyses?
Did the design provide a means to examine
all objectives, questions, or hypotheses?
If there was an intervention (treatment) in the study:
· what was the intervention? was it clearly described?
· was the treatment appropriate for examining the study purpose and hypotheses?
· did the study framework explain the links between the treatment (independent variab.
PR1 - Lesson 3.pptx
This document discusses and compares quantitative and qualitative research methods. It provides definitions and characteristics of each type of research. Quantitative research uses statistical tools and measurements to test hypotheses, while qualitative research explores phenomena through interviews, observations and narratives to develop theories. Both approaches can be useful depending on the goals and nature of the research being conducted.
(1) Critique Template for a Qualitative StudyNURS 6052Week.docx
(1): Critique Template for a Qualitative Study
NURS 6052
Week 6 Assignment: Application: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies (due by Day 7 of Week 7)
Date:
Your name:
Article reference (in APA style):
URL:
What is a critique? Simply stated, a critique is a critical analysis undertaken for some purpose. Nurses critique research for three main reasons: to improve their practice, to broaden their understanding, and to provide a base for the conduct of a study.
When the purpose is to improve practice, nurses must give special consideration to questions such as these:
· Are the research findings appropriate to my practice setting and situation?
· What further research or pilot studies need to be done, if any, before incorporating findings into practice to assure both safety and effectiveness?
· How might a proposed change in practice trigger changes in other aspects of practice?
To help you synthesize your learning throughout this course and prepare you to utilize research in your practice, you will be critiquing a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods research study of your choice.
If the article is unavailable in a full-text version through the Walden University Library, you must e-mail the article as a PDF or Word attachment to your Instructor.
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE
1. Research Issue and Purpose
What is the research question or issue of the referenced study? What is its purpose? (Sometimes ONLY the purpose is stated clearly and the question must be inferred from the introductory discussion of the purpose.)
2. Researcher Pre-understandings
Does the article include a discussion of the researcher’s pre-understandings? What does the article disclose about the researcher’s professional and personal perspectives on the research problem?
3. Literature Review
What is the quality of the literature review? Is the literature review current, relevant? Is there evidence that the author critiqued the literature or merely reported it without critique? Is there an integrated summary of the current knowledge base regarding the research problem, or does the literature review contain opinion or anecdotal articles without any synthesis or summary of the whole? (Sometimes the literature review is incorporated into the introductory section without being explicitly identified.)
4. Theoretical or Conceptual Framework
Is a theoretical or conceptual framework identified? If so, what is it? Is it a nursing framework or one drawn from another discipline? (Sometimes there is no explicitly identified theoretical or conceptual framework; in addition, many “nursing” research studies draw on a “borrowed” framework, e.g., stress, medical pathology, etc.)
5. Participants
Who were the participants? Is the setting or study group adequately described? Is the setting appropriate for the research question? What type of sampling strategy was used? Was it appropriate? Was the sample size adequate? Did t ...
Quantitative Method
This document provides guidance on developing quantitative research methods sections for surveys and experiments. It outlines key components to include such as defining the population and sampling procedure, describing the survey instrumentation and plans for validation, identifying the variables and data analysis steps, and interpreting results. For surveys, it recommends specifying the survey format, population, sampling strategy, validity/reliability of instrumentation, and statistical analysis plan. For experiments, it suggests defining the variables, participants, materials, procedures, measures, pre/post tests, and statistical analyses for hypothesis testing and interpreting findings.
Mixed methods research
This document provides an overview of mixed methods research. It discusses the three main types of research designs: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. It explains the differences between qualitative and quantitative research in terms of purpose, group studied, variables, data collection/analysis, and results. The document also discusses pragmatism as the philosophy behind mixed methods research and reasons for combining methods. It outlines various ways that qualitative and quantitative methods can be mixed, such as through timing, weighting, and mixing of data. The document concludes by describing six main mixed methods designs and recommending further readings on the topic.
Language and Literature Research (7 of 16)
Language and Literature Research (7 of 16)
Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET) Reviewer for Majorship-English Secondary.
Chapter Six The Purpose Statement
This document provides guidance on writing purpose statements for qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research studies. It defines what a purpose statement is and its key components. Examples are given for purpose statements in qualitative studies like phenomenology, case studies, and ethnographies. Examples are also given for quantitative studies like surveys and experiments. Finally, examples are provided for different mixed methods designs, including convergent, explanatory sequential, and exploratory sequential designs. The document offers scripts and guidelines for writing effective purpose statements for different research approaches.
Methodology and IRB/URR
Dr. Lani discusses all aspects of the dissertation methodology, including: selecting a survey instrument, population, reliability, validity, data analysis plan, and IRB/URR considerations.
Systematic and Scoping Reviews.pptx
Systematic reviews, rapid reviews, and scoping reviews are all types of literature reviews but differ in their methods and objectives. Systematic reviews have a narrow question and use comprehensive searches and selection criteria to minimize bias. They analyze available studies to answer a specific question. Rapid reviews have time constraints and omit some systematic review stages to provide timely information. Scoping reviews have broader questions and identify the nature and scope of research on a topic, including identifying gaps. They involve iterative searches and selection and usually do not critically appraise studies.
The Research Process.ppt
The document outlines the key aspects of the research process, including the purposes of research such as exploration, description, and explanation. It then discusses the essential elements of research including clearly defining the problem, reviewing existing literature, selecting an appropriate research design and data collection techniques, gathering and analyzing data, and presenting implications and conclusions. The different types of research designs like cross-sectional, longitudinal, time series, and panel designs are also summarized.
critical appraisal ppt.pptx
The critical appraisal process examines research to judge its validity and relevance. It involves summarizing key aspects of research articles like the introduction, methods, results and discussion sections. Important tools for appraisal include the PICO method to assess the research question, and CASP checklists tailored to different study designs. Proper appraisal helps identify clinically relevant papers and supports evidence-based decision making.
Similar to Research Evaluation WorksheetPSYCH610 Version 12Universit.docx (20)
Assignment 1 Evaluation of a peer-reviewed articlePurpose Th.docx
Assignment 1 Evaluation of a peer-reviewed articlePurpose Th.docx
Critical Appraisal Process for Quantitative ResearchAs you cri.docx
Critical Appraisal Process for Quantitative ResearchAs you cri.docx
Assignment 1 Evaluation of a peer-reviewed articlePurpose The .docx
Assignment 1 Evaluation of a peer-reviewed articlePurpose The .docx
Health Evidence™ Critical Appraisal Tool for Economic Evaluations (Sample Ans...
Health Evidence™ Critical Appraisal Tool for Economic Evaluations (Sample Ans...
Appraisal Tool for Evaluating Experimental and Designs.docx
Appraisal Tool for Evaluating Experimental and Designs.docx
(1) Critique Template for a Qualitative StudyNURS 6052Week.docx
(1) Critique Template for a Qualitative StudyNURS 6052Week.docx
More from debishakespeare
Ethical Case Study 2Gloria is a housekeeper in an independent li.docx
Ethical Case Study 2
Gloria is a housekeeper in an independent living community. While walking through a hallway, she noticed the door of a resident’s apartment was left open, which was unusual. She stepped in to check on Louis, and quickly realized that he was on the phone in his living room. As she turned to leave, she over heard him saying that he had stopped taking all of his medications because he was ready to die. She could tell that the person that he was speaking with was trying to reason with him. Gloria knows that Louis has a very loving and involved daughter that visits him every Saturday. She left the room determined that she would tell his daughter what she heard when she saw her on Saturday.
You have to answer all the questions below
What issues are facing Gloria? Discuss the possible ethical principles at play and your recommendation to Gloria.
Hint: Confidentiality, Beneficence, Self-determination
.
Ethical consideration is important in nursing practice, especial.docx
The document discusses the importance of considering a patient's ethnic and cultural background when providing nursing care, especially for patients with type 2 diabetes. It describes a Hispanic patient who was hospitalized for complications of type 2 diabetes and a chronic foot ulcer. His cultural beliefs about diabetes and fatalism impacted his self-management. The nurse considered his ethnicity and ensured culturally competent care by understanding his perspectives on diabetes causation and remedies.
Ethical Competency Writing Assignment DescriptionPHI 108 Spr.docx
Ethical Competency Writing Assignment Description
PHI 108 Spring 2019
Dr. David M. DiQuattro
March 5, 2019
1 Basic Assignment Description
For your ethical competency writing assignment, you will write analyze a disagreement between two authors/viewpoints
that we discussed this semester. I am calling the assignment a critical disagreement analysis. Below I will
provide a number of examples of disagreements between the authors we discuss this semester. Your
paper will have the following components
1. Hone the disagreement
• I want you to start by taking my general statement of disagreement and providing your own clear specifics
that focus on particular claims or passages. Here you are taking my starting point, but providing your
own framing of the disagreement that will provide focus for your paper.
• You will hone your statement of the disagreement in a way that sets things up for the next parts of the
paper.
• For example:
– In number 2 below, you will identify a specific critique of Rawls from either Kittay or Noddings.
You need to explain where the disagreement is and set the stage for a fruitful dialogue to follow in
the paper.
• This part of the paper should be focused. You should discuss the two views in a way that sets the stage
for your objection and response.
• In the opening part of the paper you need to preview what is ahead - you may only write this part late
in the writing process, but you need to provide a clear preview of where the rest of the paper goes.
2. Provide the best objection from one point of view to another
• I want you to do more than just state the two sides of the issue in this paper. I want you to bring the
authors into dialogue. You will do this by articulating an objection to one position from the point of
view of the other, then responding to the objection.
– You want your objection to be more than just restating a point where the authors diagree. Here’s
what I mean by just restating, as an example:
1
Kant believes that there are absolute rules that should be followed without regard to conse-
quences. The strongest utilitarian objection to this is that Kant disregards the importance
of how an action affects overall happiness.
– The above is an example of what not to do. That way of stating things won’t get you far because
it is just a re-stating of a key difference between Kant and utilitarianism.
• You should look for an objection that raises a new question for the other point of view, or points out
an unforeseen implication of the view. In some way it should move discussion forward. I am not
asking you to discover something that has never been said about these issues. I just want
you to deepen your understanding of the two views by raising a serious objection to one
position, then responding to it.
– In some way the objection should force you to think in new ways about the position objected to.
• In this section you should explain as clearly as you can how the objection presents a proble.
Ethical Case StudyAn example of unethical treatment of participa.docx
Ethical Case Study
An example of unethical treatment of participants was the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, who believed they were being treated for “bad blood”
“Bad blood”: A term used to describe problems like anemia, fatigue, and syphilis
Those in the control group were not given treatment for syphilis, and many died
Why would this research study not fall under the present ethical and legal restraint? Please support your answer with scholarly articles.
.
Ethical AwarenessDEFINITION a brief definition of the k.docx
Ethical Awareness
DEFINITION
:
a brief definition of the key term followed by the APA reference for the term; this does not count in the word requirement.
SUMMARY
:
Summarize the article in your own words- this should be in the
150-200 word range
. Be sure to note the article's author, note their credentials and why we should put any weight behind his/her opinions, research or findings regarding the key term.
DISCUSSION
:
Using
300-350 words
, write a brief discussion, in your own words of how the article relates to the selected chapter Key Term. A discussion is not rehashing what was already stated in the article, but the opportunity for you to
add value by sharing your experiences, thoughts, and opinions
.
This is the most important part of the assignment.
REFERENCES
:
All references must be listed at the bottom of the submission--in APA format.
Please follow the above format, No Plagiarism, APA format, add citations and references.
.
ETHICAL CHALLENGES JOYCAROLYNE MUIGAINTC3025262020.docx
ETHICAL CHALLENGES
JOYCAROLYNE MUIGAI
NTC/302
5/26/2020
INTRODUCTION
Ethics in business is mainly concerned with the good or bad actions and behaviors that often take place in the world of business
Ethical challenges have often resulted from lack of a clear and distinctive description of norms that ought to be used
Business ethics hence help economists to think productively along moral dimensions on matters regarding policy problems
Ethics could be a complex aspect in business as it influences all aspect of business as it provides the most adequate action that ought to be taken. Ethics causes huge conflicts as morality may not be clearly definitive and situations in many cases greatly vary (Nuseir & Ghandour, 2019).
2
Ethics in intellectual property
Intellectual property rights is a socio-economic tool that create some form of monopoly for firms to charge a price for their innovations
For many innovative firms, it is a timely and expensive to come up with new innovations for the market yet other competitors in the market will attempt to copy new design of products launched.
Firms have however, taken advantage of intellectual property rights by asking for high prices for products
Intellectual property rights are a tool that protects innovators from losing their innovations to counter-feighting firms in the market. However many have leveraged this property rights to put high prices on their products to maximize their profits from their innovations (Sonderholm, 2018).
3
Policy statement on Ethics in intellectual property
To ensure easy and right access of new innovated products, it is important to come up with an ethical way to reduce exploitation by firms.
Firms can take up he differential pricing strategy that has in the past been articulated to be of great influence and guarantees the firm’s profitability
Through differentia; pricing, the protected innovation can be offered at different prices based on the socio-economic demographics of the area. A product can be offered at a cheaper price at a low-earning area while it is offered at different price at a different location (Sonderholm, 2018).
4
Corruption index
Corruption is seen as legal complication that is often manifested in the absence of controls over power
Corruption in business could come in many ways but it is always some grease payment paid to expedite decision or transactions
Connection are as well viewed as to have an effect on business processes as they have a negative connotation regardless of their informality.
In many business ventures, corruption has been indicated to grow over time and is often seen in terms of exchange of favors for the sake of expedition of certain process to take a shorter time without necessarily having to undergo the require stipulated process (Samuel, 2019).
5
Policy statement in corruption index
Transparency is key in business processes hence all actions need to be accounted for
As a way to reduce the corruption index and subsequ.
Ethical Conduct of Researchpower point from this document, 1.docx
Ethical Conduct of Research
power point from this document, 15 slides
Introduction
Depending on the context of the study, researchers often encounter ethical dilemmas that are associated with respect for privacy, establishment of honest and open interactions, and avoidance of misrepresentation. From an ethical standpoint, such challenging circumstances may surface if researchers are grappling with conflicting issues and have to choose between different methodological approaches in complex circumstances. In such circumstances, disagreements among different components including participants, researchers, researchers’ disciplines, the financing organization, and the society might be inevitable. Therefore, there are numerous ethical concerns that should be taken into account when undertaking studies that deal with human subjects. Understanding ethical principles can guide researchers to conduct studies that safeguard the wellbeing of human subjects.
Overview of the Research
In a research work titled
Resilience of People Living with HIV/AIDS in Indonesia: a Phenomenological Study
, Kumboyono et al. (2018) observe that HIV/ AIDS is among the most prevalent and expanding communicable diseases on the planet. The number of individuals who are diagnosed with HIV/AIDS continues to skyrocket every year in Indonesia and other parts of the world. According to Kumboyono et al. (2018), individuals who suffer from HIV/AIDS often plunge themselves into a series of crises, which indicate the challenges of living with the chronic pathological condition. As such, resilience is one distinct phenomenon that is common among persons living with the diseases Indonesia, a pattern that indicates the results of current health management and expectations of HIV/AIDS patients for better and improved health outcomes. In light of this concern, Kumboyono et al. (2018) undertook a study that sought to examine the mechanism of resilience in Indonesian people living with HIV/AIDS and the factors that influence their specific mechanisms.
Using qualitative phenomenological design, the researchers sampled a total of 27 people living with HIV/AIDS from a primary health care institution in Malang City, East Java, Indonesia. The participants were selected from different socioeconomic, gender, and sexual orientations. The researchers informed participants about the conduct and processes involved in the study, resulting in their consent to participate in the interview process. The findings of the study indicated that the diagnosis of HIV/AIDS reflects the onset of psychological and social distress. Moreover, Kumbomoyo et al. (2018) found that the spiritual response that follows diagnosis is a state that is characterized by crises. As a consequence, the coping strategies and understanding of life by HIV patients is a definite sign on resilience. Based on these findings, Kumbomoyo et al. (2018) infer that HIV/AIDS is a chronic infection that has the potential to induce the unique .
Ethical Challenges and Agency IssuesI.IntroductionII.E.docx
Ethical Challenges and Agency Issues
I.
Introduction
II.
Ethical Challenges and Agency Issues on “study case I”
III.
Ethical Challenges and Agency Issues on “study case II”
IV.
Explain Reactions to Financial Crisis
a. 1993 Act
b. 1934 Act
c. SOX Act
V. Conclusion
Case study I: “Timely Reporting of Budget Problems Case Study” on pp. 388 & 389 (Ch. 10).
Case study II: “Level of Executive Pay Case Study” on pp. 605-607 (Ch. 15).
References:
Cost Management: Measuring, Monitoring, and Motivating Performance, 1e
Chapter 10: Cost Management: Measuring, Monitoring, and Motivating Performance, 1e
ISBN: 9780471205494 Author: Leslie G. Eldenburg
Copyright © John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2005)
.
Ethical Approaches An Overview of .docx
Ethical Approaches
An Overview of:
(1)Consequential,
(2) Nonconsequential, and
(3) Virtue Ethics Theories
What is Ethics?
Ethics is the study of those values that relate to our moral conduct,
including questions of good and evil, right and wrong, and moral responsibility.
Consequentialist Theoretical Approach:
-Consequentialist theories claim that the morality of an action depends only on its consequences.
-It only considers the result of actions and not principles or rules in determining morality.
1
Three (3) Types of Consequentialist Theories:
-Ethical Egoism argues that each person should act in his/her own self-interest.
-Act Utilitarianism argues that each person should act in a way that produces the greatest happiness
for everyone.
-Rule Utilitarianism argues that each person should follow rules that tend to produce the greatest
happiness for everyone.
Weaknesses of Consequentialist Theories
-Requires person to predict the future and all possible outcomes.
-Can easily be used to justify questionable actions (the ends justifies the means).
2
Nonconsequentialist Theoretical Approach:
Nonconsequentialist theories claim that the morality of an action depends on principles or other factors
that are not related to consequences.
Two (2) Types of Nonconsequentialist Theories:
-Divine command theory argues that we should obey the laws of God.
-Kant’s Categorical Imperative states that we should always act in a way that is based on reason, duty,
and would be considered ethical if everyone acted in the exact same way. Also, people should be
treated as an end and not as a means.
Weaknesses of Nonconsequentialist Theories: Self-Challenge Question:
Question: What might prove a problem in a country so diverse as the U.S. with regards to
Nonconsequentialist theories?
When you are ready check the expert’s response.
3
https://kapextmediassl-a.akamaihd.net/business/CS125/1902c/ethics_challenge_expert1.pdf
Virtue Ethics Theoretical Approach:
-Virtue ethics seeks to identify character traits of a moral person and develop those with the idea that the
virtuous person will act in a virtuous manner. It does not look to principles or consequences.
-Virtue ethics was developed among the ancient Greek philosophers such as Aristotle and the Chinese
teacher and philosopher Confucius.
-Virtue ethics enjoys modern support as an approach that avoids many of the problems with
Consequential and Nonconsequential ethical theories.
Weaknesses of Virtue Theory
-Difficulty in determining just which characteristics are virtues
-Justification for respecting a virtue usually brings one back to either consequences or principles.
-Difficulty in applying it to specific situations
4
Example of all Three Theoretical Ethical Approaches:
Scenario: The air quality in a particular city Y is so polluted, people are getting physically ill and are on .
Ethical and Professional Issues in Group PracticeThose who seek .docx
Ethical and Professional Issues in Group Practice
Those who seek to be professional group leaders must be willing to examine both their ethical standards and their level of competence. Among the ethical issues treated in this chapter are the rights of group members, including informed consent and confidentiality; the psychological risks of groups; personal relationships with clients; socializing among members; the impact of the group leader’s values; addressing spiritual and religious values of group members; working effectively and ethically with diverse clients; and the uses and misuses of group techniques. In my opinion, a central ethical issue in group work pertains to the group leader’s competence. Special attention is given to ways of determining competence, professional training standards, and adjuncts to academic preparation of group counselors. Also highlighted are ethical issues involved in training group workers. The final section outlines issues of legal liability and malpractice.
As a responsible group practitioner, you are challenged to clarify your thinking about the ethical and professional issues discussed in this chapter. Although you are obligated to be familiar with, and bound by, the ethics codes of your professional organization, many of these codes offer only general guidelines. You will need to learn how to make ethical decisions in practical situations. The ethics codes provide a general framework from which to operate, but you must apply these principles to concrete cases. The Association for Specialists in Group Work’s (2008) “Best Practice Guidelines” is reproduced in the Student Manual that accompanies this textbook. You may want to refer to these guidelines often, especially as you study Chapters 1 through 5.
The Rights of Group Participants
My experience has taught me that those who enter groups are frequently unaware both of their basic rights as participants and of their responsibilities. As a group leader, you are responsible for helping prospective members understand what their rights and responsibilities are. This section offers a detailed discussion of these issues.
A Basic Right: Informed Consent
If basic information about the group is discussed at the initial session, the participants are likely to be far more cooperative and active. A leader who does this as a matter of policy demonstrates honesty and respect for group members and fosters the trust necessary for members to be open and active. Such a leader has obtained the informed consent of the participants.
Informed consent is a process that begins with presenting basic information about group treatment to potential group members to enable them to make better decisions about whether or not to enter and how to participate in a group (Fallon, 2006). Members have a right to receive basic information before joining a group, and they have a right to expect certain other information during the course of the group. Discussing informed consent is not a one-t.
Ethical AnalysisSelect a work-related ethical scenario that .docx
Ethical Analysis
Select a work-related ethical scenario that you (or someone close to you) have experienced. Organizations and names should be changed when identifying references in the assignment. Compose an essay that addresses the following requirements:
Identify the key positions, titles, and assigned responsibilities in the organization.
Discuss and illustrate the individual pressures faced and how the issues were handled or delegated to another position.
Describe how changing attitudes and behaviors evolved as the incidents occurred.
Compare and contrast the behaviors in the scenario with the philosophical theories of ethical decision-making that are referenced in Unit II. Examples may include Utilitarianism or Deontology application.
Illustrate any mishandling of the decision-making process that resulted in lessons learned.
Summarize what you have learned from an analysis of this event.
Your response should be at least 500 words in length (not including the references page) in APA style. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citation.
.
Ethical (Moral) RelativismIn America, many are comfortable describ.docx
Ethical (Moral) Relativism
In America, many are comfortable describing ethics as follows: “Well, what’s right for me is right for me and what’s right for you is right for you. Let’s just agree to disagree.” This is an affirmation of what philosophers call
individual
or
subjective moral relativism
. In this understanding of relativism, morality is a matter of individual feelings and personal preference. In individual moral relativism, the determination of what is right and wrong in a situation varies according to the individual. Moral relativists do not believe in natural law or universal truths.
Cultural moral relativism
puts culture at the forefront of relative ethical decision-making. It says the individual must include the precepts of his or her culture as a prominent part of the relativistic moral action.
Lawrence
Kohlberg,
a prominent psychologist known for recognizing moral stages of development, takes it a step farther saying cultural relativists are persons stuck in the “
Conventional
Stage” of ethical development
.
In your paper, please define individual moral relativism and cultural moral relativism in detail, noting how they differ from each other, their strengths and weaknesses, and give your position on Kohlberg’s stance on ethical relativism.
What aspects of ethical relativism do you identify and agree with? What aspects do you disagree with? Give a personal example that illustrates your stance on ethical relativism, describing how you made a moral decision in an ethical dilemma. Include at least two references to support your thoughts.
Post a 500-word paper to the
M4: Assignment 2 Dropbox
by due
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
. All written assignments and responses should follow proper citation rules for attributing sources. Please use Microsoft Word spelling/grammar checker. Be mindful of plagiarism policies.
.
Ethical Analysis on Lehman Brothers financial crisis of 2008 , pleas.docx
Ethical Analysis on Lehman Brothers financial crisis of 2008 , please include bibliography and footnotes and answer the questions below.
It must be between 5-7pgs.
1. What was the case about?
2. Who was (were) the individual(s) and company (ies) involved?
3. When did it happen?
4. Why did it happen?
5. How did it come to the attention of the media?
6. What was the outcome of the case?
7. How could this case been avoided?
8. What can we learn from the case?
.
Ethical Analysis on Merrill lynch financial crisis of 2008 , please .docx
Ethical Analysis on Merrill lynch financial crisis of 2008 , please include bibliography and footnotes and aswer the questions below.
It must be between 5-7pgs.
1. What was the case about?
2. Who was (were) the individual(s) and company (ies) involved?
3. When did it happen?
4. Why did it happen?
5. How did it come to the attention of the media?
6. What was the outcome of the case?
7. How could this case been avoided?
8. What can we learn from the case?
.
ETHC 101Discussion Board Reply Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
ETHC 101
Discussion Board Reply Grading Rubric
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content 70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Points Earned
Word Count
15 points
Word count is between 500 and 600 words.
11 to 14 points
Word count exceeds 600 words.
1 to 10 points
Word count is less than 500 words.
0 points
Not present
Style
10 points
Reply offers constructive feedback to a classmate in a manner that is polite, rationally argued, and not overly emotional.
7 or 9 points
Reply offers constructive feedback to a classmate but with some deficiency of politeness, reasonableness, and/or dispassion.
1 to 6 points
Reply offers little to no constructive feedback, and/or is strongly impolite, and/or is very emotional.
0 points
The post is not a reply (it is off-topic).
Understanding
10 points
Reply utilizes many of the concepts and technical vocabulary taught in the class in a manner that demonstrates accurate understanding.
7 to 9 points
Reply utilizes some of the concepts and technical vocabulary taught in the class in a manner that demonstrates accurate understanding.
1 to 6 points
Reply utilizes some of the concepts and technical vocabulary taught in the class but sometimes in ways that suggest that they are not correctly understood.
0 points
Reply does not utilize the concepts and technical vocabulary taught in the class.
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not Present
Points Earned
Spelling, Punctuation, and Grammar
10 points
Reply is written in paragraph form and is devoid of spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors.
7 or 9 points
Reply is not written in paragraph form and/or has occasional spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors.
1 to 6 points
Reply is not written in paragraph form and has numerous spelling, punctuation, and grammar problems.
0 points
Not present
Turabian formatting
5 points
Direct references and/or allusions to outside resources (such as the textbooks) are present and are cited using footnotes in current Turabian format.
4 points
Direct references and/or allusions to outside resources (such as the textbooks) are present but are cited otherwise than using footnotes in current Turabian format.
1 to 3 points
Direct references and/or allusions to outside resources (such as the textbooks) are present but the sources are not cited. (Note: if plagiarism is present, that requires additional corrective action.)
0 points
No direct references and/or allusions to outside resources are present.
Total
/50
Instructor's Comments:
Page 1 of 1
For this untimed, open-resource essay exam, answer each question thoroughly and clearly, and ground it in course reading material. Essay answers must be more than 3 or 4 brief sentences, but kept within the bounds of an essay exam (4 - 6 paragraphs). All your writing must be in your own words. Paraphrase (restate what you read) rather than copying material from the course textbook or the Internet. No copying is permitted in this course and doing so will result in zero points on th.
Ethical and Human Rights Concerns in Global HealthChapter Fou.docx
Ethical and Human Rights Concerns in Global Health
Chapter Four
Chapter four: Ethical and human rights concerns in global health.
As with any area of health, global health is affected by the issues of ethics and right for sound health outcome. In this chapter we will explore ethical and human rights concerns, some of the central treaties and conversions related to human rights, some historically significant cases in human subject research and key principles for making critical decisions in health research.
1
Failure to respect human rights is often associated with harm to human health
Health research with human subjects puts people at risk for the sake of other people’s health
Health investments must be made in fair ways since resources are limited
The Importance of Ethical and Human Rights Issues in Global Health
Access to the health care is human right and failure to respect this right might causes harm for health. For example, the stigma associated with HIV, TB and leprosy makes it difficult for the patient to obtain necessary health care, it not only cause harm to individual health but as a whole community health even. For example, if a TB patient remains untreated by the health care workers, then that individual could be a source of infection for other people.
Health research with human subject in particular in low income countries where study participants may not have other option to obtain the medication might become a proxy of clinical trial for other people .Lastly, fair decision in health investment is critical because in low income countries where health resources are scare difficult decisions need to be made depending on the priority and severity of disease.
2
The Foundations for Health and Human Rights
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other legally binding multilateral treaties
Governments are obliged to respect, protect, and fulfill the rights they state
International Bill of Human Rights is the cornerstone for human rights. This bill include couple of documents including the Universal declaration of human rights that was officially declared in 1948, that place obligation on Government to respect , protect, and fulfill the rights of the state.
3
Selected Human Rights
The Rights-Based Approach
Assess health policies, programs, and practices in terms of impact on human rights
Analyze and address the health impacts resulting from violations of human rights when considering ways to improve population health
Prioritize the fulfillment of human rights
In considering human right, first we are going to examine the issue of right based approach. Some global health advocates argue that this approach, which thinks that fulfillment of people’s human right is conducive to their health, should be followed in global health. This means we need to assess health policies, programs or practices in terms of its impact on human right and analyze the health impacts from the perspective of violation of human rights
.
Ethical & Legal Aspects in Nursing WK 14Please answer the .docx
Ethical & Legal Aspects in Nursing WK 14
Please answer the following Discussion Question. Please be certain to answer the four questions on this week DQ and to provide a well-developed and complete answer to receive credit.
Case Study, Chapter 23, Professional Identity and Image
Nursing care is frequently perceived by the public as simple and unskilled. Many male nurses live in fear of how their caring actions might be interpreted. Many nurses hold that stereotypes about the profession are true, just as the general public does. Public identity and image has been a struggle for nurses for a long time. The greater public clearly does not understand what professional nursing is all about, and the nursing profession has done a poor job of correcting long-standing, historically inaccurate stereotypes.
1. What are the common nursing stereotypes?
2. What was the role of the Center for Nursing Advocacy? Discuss the role of Truth about Nursing in addressing inaccurate or negative portrayals of nursing in the media and the process they use to raise public and professional awareness of the issues surrounding nursing public image?
3. What are some of the ways of changing nursing’s image in the public eye?
4. One of the most important strategies needed to change nursing’s image is to change the image of nursing in the mind of the image makers. What are some of the key ways for nurses to interact with the media?
INSTRUCTIONS:
APA FORMAT
IN TEXT CITATIONS WITH 3 REFERENCES NO LESS THAN 5 YEARS
.
EthernetSatellite dishInternational Plastics, Inc. - C.docx
Ethernet
Satellite dish
�
International Plastics, Inc. - China Headquarters
Corp
Marketing
Finance
HR
R&D
Network
MAC
PRO
(15)
Dual 1.8 GB
1 Ghz 6 core
12 GB Ram
1 TB HD
27" monitors
Satellite base station
NAS
Iomega
P800M
24 Port Hub
Linksys EF2H24
WIN
Exchange
Server
WIN
Network
Server
UNIX
ERP/MRP
Server
ERP = SAP
UPS:
Serve the entire server room; additional UPS in satellite base station.
IBM
pSeries
6E4 Multipocessor
16GB RAM
1 TB HD
2 ea IBM
HS20
Blade Svrs
2 X XEON
2.8 GHz
1 GB RAM
1 GB Fiber backbone
3 ea Phaser 6700 color Printers
100 base T
35 ea Dell
Vostro
i3 3.3 Ghz
4 GB RAM
500 GB HD
WIN 7 OS
Office 2007
12
8
8
7
2 ea 24 port switches
Cisco 2950
35 IP
Phones
Gateway/Switch
1 HP Plotter
Identical to other WIN servers
VOIP/Data
Router
T3 to
outside network
Gateway/Switch
VOIP/Data
Router
Ka Band
ATM AA1 PVC 51.8 Mb data rate, AES end-to-end
8 HP Laserjet BW printers – P3015dn
2 in each department
Ethernet
Satellite dish
�
International Plastics, Inc. - Corporate Headquarters
Corp
Marketing
Finance
HR
R&D
Network
MAC
PRO
(15)
Dual 1.8 GB
1 Ghz 6 core
12 GB Ram
1 TB HD
27" monitors
Satellite base station
NAS
Iomega
P800M
24 Port Hub
Linksys EF2H24
WIN
Exchange
Server
WIN
Network
Server
UNIX
ERP/MRP
Server
ERP = SAP
UPS:
Serve the entire server room; additional UPS in satellite base station.
IBM
pSeries
6E4 Multipocessor
16GB RAM
1 TB HD
2 ea IBM
HS20
Blade Svrs
2 X XEON
2.8 GHz
1 GB RAM
1 GB Fiber backbone
3 ea Phaser 6700 color Printers
100 base T
35 ea Dell
Vostro
i3 3.3 Ghz
4 GB MB RAM
GB HD
WIN 7 OS
Office 2007
12
8
8
7
2 ea 24 port switches
Cisco 2950
35 IP
Phones
Gateway/Switch
1 HP Plotter
Identical to other WIN servers
VOIP/Data
Router
T3 to
outside network
Gateway/Switch
VOIP/Data
Router
Ka Band
ATM AA1 PVC 51.8 Mb data rate, AES end-to-end
8 HP Laserjet BW P4510 Printers: 2 in each department.
2 HP color Multifunction Office Jet 8600. 1 in corporate, 1 in marketing
Ethernet
�
�
�
�
�
Disk array
�
No symbols exist on the page to display.�
Legend�
Legend Subtitle�
Symbol�
Count�
Description�
Cisco Router
2900
T-2 connection to corporate
UPS
HP Laserjet Pro MFN
M425dn
NAS Disk array
Cat 5 cable
45 client computers with Windows 7 and MS office 2007
4 Network Printers
Cat 5 cabling in building
45 office computers
Dell Vostro
I3 3.3 GHz
4 GB RAM
500 MB HD
Manufacturing
Floor
48 Port patch panels
Connection to
Corp.
Fiber link for NAS
2 - HP Laserjet M602n
HP CP4225n
Color Laser Printer
Blade Server
HP – BL 460 P
Print, file, Exchange, local ERP back to home office
Cisco Catylst 3580 Ethernet switch 48 port
Cisco catalyst 3560
Ethernet switch 24 port
APC Smart-UPS
5000 VA USB & Serial 220VAC
International Plastics, Inc.
Pontiac, MI Network Diagram
Ethernet
Disk array
Link builder
Firewall
Cisco Router
2900
Fiber link for NAS
24 port
100 Mbps Switches
NAS Disk array
T 2 connection to corporate
2.
Ethanolv.DrizinUnited States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern .docx
Ethanolv.Drizin
United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern DivisionFeb 7, 2006
No. C03-2021 (N.D. Iowa Feb. 7, 2006) Copy Citation
No. C03-2021.
February 7, 2006
Be a better lawyer. Casetext is legal research for lawyers who want do their best work.
ORDER
JOHN JARVEY, Magistrate Judge
This matter comes before the court pursuant to trial on the merits which commenced on January 23, 2006. The above-described parties have consented to jurisdiction before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The court finds in favor of the plaintiff and awards compensatory damages in the amount of $3,800,000 and punitive damages in the amount of $7,600,000.
In this case, the plaintiff brings numerous theories of recovery against defendant Jerry Drizin arising out of the misappropriation of escrow funds that were to serve as security for financing for the construction of an ethanol plant in Manchester, Iowa. The plaintiff contends that defendant Drizin, in concert with others, knowingly converted funds from an escrow account that were not to have been spent on anything without the plaintiff's prior written permission. Defendant Drizin contends that his only client and only duty of loyalty was to a Nigerian citizen living in Munich who caused the funds to be sent to bank accounts controlled by Defendant Drizin. The court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.
In 2000 in Manchester, Iowa, farmer and President of the local Co-op, Douglas Bishop, began meeting with representatives of the United States Department of Agriculture to explore the feasibility of building an ethanol plant in the Manchester area. The idea was to assist farmers in the area in getting more value for their crops. An ethanol plant produces ethanol and feed grain which can be sold at a profit exceeding that associated with the mere sale of grain.
A series of 40 local meetings culminated in a membership drive. The Plaintiff, Northeast Iowa Ethanol, L.L.C., was later formed in order to sell 2500 shares of stock in the L.L.C. to raise funds for the financing of the plant. The construction of the plant was expected to cost $21 Million. It would have a capacity for producing 15 million gallons of ethanol per year. Through the meetings, Mr. Bishop and others raised $2,365,000. The average investor purchased two shares.
The membership drive ended in September 2001. The original plan was to begin construction in the fall of 2001 and have the plant operating by the fall of 2002. However, the issue of financing for the plant was more problematic than plaintiff had anticipated. Traditional lenders (banks) demanded that the plaintiff raise forty percent of the construction costs. It was clear that the plaintiff could not raise $8 Million. Plaintiff's proposed marketing partner, Williams Ethanol Services, agreed to invest $1 Million in the project. The contractor anticipated to build the facility, North Central Construction from North Dakota,.
Ethan FromeEdith WhartonTHE EMC MASTERPIECE SERIES.docx
Ethan Frome
Edith Wharton
THE EMC MASTERPIECE SERIES
Access Editions
SERIES EDITOR
Robert D. Shepherd
EMC/Paradigm Publishing
St. Paul, Minnesota
SSttaaffff CCrreeddiittss::
For EEMMCC//PPaarraaddiiggmm PPuubblliisshhiinngg,, St. Paul, Minnesota
For PPeennoobbssccoott SScchhooooll PPuubblliisshhiinngg,, IInncc..,, Danvers, Massachusetts
ISBN 0-8219-1649-1
Copyright © 1998 by EMC Corporation
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be adapted, reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, elec-
tronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without permis-
sion from the publishers.
Published by EMC/Paradigm Publishing
875 Montreal Way
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
Printed in the United States of America.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 xxx 09 10 11 12
Laurie Skiba
Editor
Shannon O’Donnell Taylor
Associate Editor
Eileen Slater
Editorial Consultant
Jennifer J. Anderson
Assistant Editor
EEddiittoorriiaall
Robert D. Shepherd
President, Executive Editor
Christina E. Kolb
Managing Editor
Sara Hyry
Editor
Laurie A. Faria
Associate Editor
Sharon Salinger
Copyeditor
Marilyn Murphy Shepherd
Editorial Advisor
DDeessiiggnn aanndd PPrroodduuccttiioonn
Charles Q. Bent
Production Manager
Sara Day
Art Director
Diane Castro
Compositor
Janet Stebbings
Compositor
The Life and Works of Edith Wharton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv
Echoes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
Time Line of Wharton’s Life. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii
The Historical Context of Ethan Frome. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
Characters in Ethan Frome. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xii
Illustration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiii
Introduction by Edith Wharton. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xiv
Prologue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Chapter 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Chapter 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Chapter 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Chapter 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Chapter 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Chapter 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Chapter 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Chapter 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Chapter 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Epilogue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Plot Analysis of Ethan Frome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Creative Writ.
More from debishakespeare (20)
Ethical Case Study 2Gloria is a housekeeper in an independent li.docx
Ethical Case Study 2Gloria is a housekeeper in an independent li.docx
Ethical consideration is important in nursing practice, especial.docx
Ethical consideration is important in nursing practice, especial.docx
Ethical Competency Writing Assignment DescriptionPHI 108 Spr.docx
Ethical Competency Writing Assignment DescriptionPHI 108 Spr.docx
Ethical Case StudyAn example of unethical treatment of participa.docx
Ethical Case StudyAn example of unethical treatment of participa.docx
Ethical AwarenessDEFINITION a brief definition of the k.docx
Ethical AwarenessDEFINITION a brief definition of the k.docx
ETHICAL CHALLENGES JOYCAROLYNE MUIGAINTC3025262020.docx
ETHICAL CHALLENGES JOYCAROLYNE MUIGAINTC3025262020.docx
Ethical Conduct of Researchpower point from this document, 1.docx
Ethical Conduct of Researchpower point from this document, 1.docx
Ethical Challenges and Agency IssuesI.IntroductionII.E.docx
Ethical Challenges and Agency IssuesI.IntroductionII.E.docx
Ethical and Professional Issues in Group PracticeThose who seek .docx
Ethical and Professional Issues in Group PracticeThose who seek .docx
Ethical AnalysisSelect a work-related ethical scenario that .docx
Ethical AnalysisSelect a work-related ethical scenario that .docx
Ethical (Moral) RelativismIn America, many are comfortable describ.docx
Ethical (Moral) RelativismIn America, many are comfortable describ.docx
Ethical Analysis on Lehman Brothers financial crisis of 2008 , pleas.docx
Ethical Analysis on Lehman Brothers financial crisis of 2008 , pleas.docx
Ethical Analysis on Merrill lynch financial crisis of 2008 , please .docx
Ethical Analysis on Merrill lynch financial crisis of 2008 , please .docx
ETHC 101Discussion Board Reply Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
ETHC 101Discussion Board Reply Grading RubricCriteriaLevels .docx
Ethical and Human Rights Concerns in Global HealthChapter Fou.docx
Ethical and Human Rights Concerns in Global HealthChapter Fou.docx
Ethical & Legal Aspects in Nursing WK 14Please answer the .docx
Ethical & Legal Aspects in Nursing WK 14Please answer the .docx
EthernetSatellite dishInternational Plastics, Inc. - C.docx
EthernetSatellite dishInternational Plastics, Inc. - C.docx
Ethanolv.DrizinUnited States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern .docx
Ethanolv.DrizinUnited States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Eastern .docx
Ethan FromeEdith WhartonTHE EMC MASTERPIECE SERIES.docx
Ethan FromeEdith WhartonTHE EMC MASTERPIECE SERIES.docx
Recently uploaded
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/nrwz52lilmrw6m5kqeqn83q6vbdp8yzpBÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
https://app.box.com/s/tacvl9ekroe9hqupdnjruiypvm9rdaneHow to Fix [Errno 98] address already in use
This slide will represent the cause of the error “[Errno 98] address already in use” and the troubleshooting steps to resolve this error in Odoo.
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
Slides from a Capitol Technology University webinar held June 20, 2024. The webinar featured Dr. Donovan Wright, presenting on the Department of Defense Digital Transformation.
Educational Technology in the Health Sciences
Plenary presentation at the NTTC Inter-university Workshop, 18 June 2024, Manila Prince Hotel.
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
The History of NZ 1870-1900.
Making of a Nation.
From the NZ Wars to Liberals,
Richard Seddon, George Grey,
Social Laboratory, New Zealand,
Confiscations, Kotahitanga, Kingitanga, Parliament, Suffrage, Repudiation, Economic Change, Agriculture, Gold Mining, Timber, Flax, Sheep, Dairying,
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
Geography as discipline
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف أحرف الخلاف للقراء العشرةأعد أحرف الخلاف بالتلوين وصلا سمير بسيوني غفر الله له
HYPERTENSION - SLIDE SHARE PRESENTATION.
IT WILL BE HELPFULL FOR THE NUSING STUDENTS
IT FOCUSED ON MEDICAL MANAGEMENT AND NURSING MANAGEMENT.
HIGHLIGHTS ON HEALTH EDUCATION.
How Barcodes Can Be Leveraged Within Odoo 17
In this presentation, we will explore how barcodes can be leveraged within Odoo 17 to streamline our manufacturing processes. We will cover the configuration steps, how to utilize barcodes in different manufacturing scenarios, and the overall benefits of implementing this technology.
How to Manage Reception Report in Odoo 17
A business may deal with both sales and purchases occasionally. They buy things from vendors and then sell them to their customers. Such dealings can be confusing at times. Because multiple clients may inquire about the same product at the same time, after purchasing those products, customers must be assigned to them. Odoo has a tool called Reception Report that can be used to complete this assignment. By enabling this, a reception report comes automatically after confirming a receipt, from which we can assign products to orders.
Recently uploaded (20)
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) Curriculum
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 8 - CẢ NĂM - FRIENDS PLUS - NĂM HỌC 2023-2024 (B...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH LỚP 9 CẢ NĂM - GLOBAL SUCCESS - NĂM HỌC 2024-2025 - ...
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptx
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
Level 3 NCEA - NZ: A Nation In the Making 1872 - 1900 SML.ppt
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
Geography as a Discipline Chapter 1 __ Class 11 Geography NCERT _ Class Notes...
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
مصحف القراءات العشر أعد أحرف الخلاف سمير بسيوني.pdf
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
SWOT analysis in the project Keeping the Memory @live.pptx
Research Evaluation WorksheetPSYCH610 Version 12Universit.docx
- 1. Research Evaluation Worksheet PSYCH/610 Version 1 2 University of Phoenix Material Research Evaluation Worksheet Title: Full Article Reference (APA style): Abstract Introduction a. Is the need for the study clearly stated in the introduction? Explain by using information presented in the literature review. b. What is the research hypothesis or question? c. What are the variables of interest (independent and dependent variables)? d. How are the variables operationally defined? Method a. Sample Size (Total): ________________ Size Per Group/Cell: _______________ b. Were the methods and procedures described so that the study could be replicated without further information? What information, if any, would you need to replicate or reproduce this study? Participants
- 2. a. How were participants selected and recruited? b. Were subjects randomly selected? c. Were there any biases in sampling? Explain d. Were the samples appropriate for the population to which the researcher wished to generalize? e. What are the characteristics of the sample populations? Research Design (check which design applies) _______ Single group, time series study _______ Multiple baseline (sequential) design: ______________ _______ Single group, no measurement _______ Single group with measurement: Pre ______ During _____ Post _____ _______ Two groups classic experimental versus control group, randomly assigned _______ (quasi-experimental) two groups experimental versus control group, not randomly assigned _______ Correlation research, not manipulated, degree of relationship _______ Descriptive research (qualitative study) _______ Natural observation
- 3. _______ Analytical research _______ Interview research _______ Historical study _______ Survey research _______ Legal study _______ Ethnography research _______ Policy analysis _______ Fieldwork research _______ Evaluation study _______ Phenomenology _______ Grounded theory _______ Protocol analysis (collection and analysis of verbatim reports)
- 4. _______ Case study, no measurement _______ Case study, with measurement: Pre _________ During _______ Post _________ _______ Developmental research _______ Longitudinal (same group of subjects over period of time) _______ Cross-sectional (subjects from different age groups compared) _______ Cross-sequential (subjects from different age groups, shorter period of time) _______ Correlation, more than two groups: control, treatment, and other treatment comparisons _______ Factorial design, two or more groups: other treatment differences, no untreated controls _______ Two or more dependent variables (MANOVA) _______ Other design: _____________________________________________________ _____ Consider the Following Questions: a. Was a control group used? Yes ______ No ______ If yes, complete b, c, and d below. b. Was the “control” method for the study appropriate? c. What variable was being controlled for?
- 5. d. In the case of an experimental study, were subject randomly assigned to groups? Measures a. Describe the Dependent Measure(s)/Instruments used: b. Describe the Measurement/Instrument Validity Information: c. Describe the Measurement/Instrument Reliability Information: Consider the Following Questions: a. For all measures (measures to classify subjects, dependent variables, etc..) was evidence of reliability and validity provided, either through summarizing the data, or by referring the reader to an available source for that information? b. Do the reliability and validity data justify the use of the measure? c. Are the measures appropriate (if not, why not)? d. Are multiple measures used, particularly those that sample the same domains, or constructs but with different methods (e.g., self-report, rating scales, self-monitoring, or direct observation)? f. If human observers, judges, or raters were involved, was inter-observer or inter-rater agreement (reliability) assessed? Was it obtained for a representative sample of the data? Did the two raters do their ratings independently? Was their reliability satisfactory? Independent and Dependent Variables
- 6. a. What is/are the Independent Variable(s): b. What is/are the Dependent Variable(s): Data Analysis Scales of Measurement (check those that apply): Nominal _______ Ordinal _______ Interval _______ Ratio _______ a. What type of statistical techniques are used? b. What type of tables and graphs are used? Consider the Following Questions: a. Were tests of significance used and reported appropriately (e.g., with sufficient detail to understand what analysis was being conducted)? b. Do the researchers report means and standard deviations (if relevant) so that the reader can examine whether statistically significant differences are large enough to me meaningful? c. Other comments on the reported statistical analyses? Discussion Evaluate the Summary and Conclusions of the study (Usefulness): Describe the Strength(s) and Limitation(s) of the Study: Describe what you learned from the study:
- 7. List any remaining questions you have about the study: *Adapted from form created by Dr. Randy Buckner, University of Phoenix Instructor