An approach that strays from the conventional, coupled with
consistency, enables us to contribute to the company's overall
growth and success.
This Insights talks about RIS Process and applications
Safety is an important consideration in process design. Safety integrity level (or SIL) is often used to describe process safety requirements. However, there are often misconceptions or misunder- standings surrounding SIL. While the general subject, functional safety and SIL, can be highly technical, the general ideas can be distilled down to a few readily understandable concepts. In this paper, we will discuss what SIL is, why it is important, what certification means, and the implications and benefits of that certification to the end user.
This document discusses Safety Integrity Level (SIL) and how it is used to quantify safety in industrial processes. It provides background on the development of international safety standards and defines key terms like SIL, Safety Instrumented Functions (SIF), Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD), and Safe Failure Fraction (SFF). The document explains how hazards analysis is used to determine target SIL levels for safety systems and instrumentation. It also outlines methods for evaluating SIL, including Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEDA) and proven in use testing. Overall, the document provides a comprehensive overview of applying SIL standards to ensure safety in industrial control systems.
The document discusses safety systems used in industrial plants, including emergency shutdown systems (ESD), process shutdown systems (PSD), and fire and gas control systems (F&G). It defines these terms and describes their objectives, typical components, and functions. Safety is measured by factors like average probability of failure on demand (PFDavg) and risk reduction factor (RRF). The document also covers related topics like hazard analysis, risk, reliability, availability, and definitions of key safety terminology.
SIL = Safety Integrity Level
•Safety systems are becoming increasingly instrumented
•Depending less on human intervention and operator’s ability to respond correctly in a given situation
•Depending more on instrumentation and programmable systems
•SIL requirements are intended to ensure the reliability of such safety instrumented systems
The document discusses functional safety and fire and gas (F&G) systems. It defines functional safety and outlines standards like IEC 61508. F&G systems aim to detect and respond to hazards to reduce risk. Key components discussed include detectors, logic solvers, and final elements. Specific final elements presented are Niagara monitors for delivering water, electric actuators for redundancy, and VDD deluge valves with a fully redundant design. These components are described and their advantages for achieving safety integrity levels are outlined.
Introduction to Functional Safety and SIL CertificationISA Boston Section
This overview session will acquaint attendees with the key concepts in the IEC 61508 standard for functional safety of electrical/electronic and programmable electronic systems. An introduction is provided to safety integrity levels (SIL), the safety lifecycle and the requirements needed to achieve a functional safety certificate. Information will be provided on documentation requirements and an introduction to the basic objectives of product design for functional safety.
The combustion process has always been considered having the potential for a hazardous event which could lead to personnel injury or loss of production. To mitigate this risk, the process industry is now implementing Safety Instrumented Systems which can identify hazardous operating conditions and correctly respond in such a way to bring the combustion process back to a safe operating condition or implement an automatically controlled shutdown sequence to reduce the risk of operator error causing a catastrophic event. Oxygen and combustible flue gas analyzers are now being utilized in these combustion Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) to identify hazardous operating conditions and automatically return the process to a safe state. The standards of IEC 61511 and API RP 556 will be reviewed as they apply to flue gas analyzers, as well as the process variables of the oxygen and combustible analyzer available for implementation into the SIS system for combustion monitoring, and the resultant actions required to return the process to a safe condition.
Safety instrumented systems angela summers Ahmed Gamal
This document discusses safety instrumented systems (SIS), which are designed to respond to hazardous conditions in industrial plants. An SIS monitors for conditions that could become hazardous and responds by taking actions to prevent or mitigate hazards. Examples provided include a furnace that shuts off fuel valves in response to high pressure and a reactor that opens a coolant valve when temperature rises too high. The document outlines standards for good engineering practices in designing, implementing, and maintaining SIS according to lifecycle phases from planning and design to operations and auditing. Key aspects covered are managing risks to people and procedures, assessing and mitigating risk through assigning safety integrity levels, and proving that SIS designs achieve the desired safety functionality.
Safety is an important consideration in process design. Safety integrity level (or SIL) is often used to describe process safety requirements. However, there are often misconceptions or misunder- standings surrounding SIL. While the general subject, functional safety and SIL, can be highly technical, the general ideas can be distilled down to a few readily understandable concepts. In this paper, we will discuss what SIL is, why it is important, what certification means, and the implications and benefits of that certification to the end user.
This document discusses Safety Integrity Level (SIL) and how it is used to quantify safety in industrial processes. It provides background on the development of international safety standards and defines key terms like SIL, Safety Instrumented Functions (SIF), Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD), and Safe Failure Fraction (SFF). The document explains how hazards analysis is used to determine target SIL levels for safety systems and instrumentation. It also outlines methods for evaluating SIL, including Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEDA) and proven in use testing. Overall, the document provides a comprehensive overview of applying SIL standards to ensure safety in industrial control systems.
The document discusses safety systems used in industrial plants, including emergency shutdown systems (ESD), process shutdown systems (PSD), and fire and gas control systems (F&G). It defines these terms and describes their objectives, typical components, and functions. Safety is measured by factors like average probability of failure on demand (PFDavg) and risk reduction factor (RRF). The document also covers related topics like hazard analysis, risk, reliability, availability, and definitions of key safety terminology.
SIL = Safety Integrity Level
•Safety systems are becoming increasingly instrumented
•Depending less on human intervention and operator’s ability to respond correctly in a given situation
•Depending more on instrumentation and programmable systems
•SIL requirements are intended to ensure the reliability of such safety instrumented systems
The document discusses functional safety and fire and gas (F&G) systems. It defines functional safety and outlines standards like IEC 61508. F&G systems aim to detect and respond to hazards to reduce risk. Key components discussed include detectors, logic solvers, and final elements. Specific final elements presented are Niagara monitors for delivering water, electric actuators for redundancy, and VDD deluge valves with a fully redundant design. These components are described and their advantages for achieving safety integrity levels are outlined.
Introduction to Functional Safety and SIL CertificationISA Boston Section
This overview session will acquaint attendees with the key concepts in the IEC 61508 standard for functional safety of electrical/electronic and programmable electronic systems. An introduction is provided to safety integrity levels (SIL), the safety lifecycle and the requirements needed to achieve a functional safety certificate. Information will be provided on documentation requirements and an introduction to the basic objectives of product design for functional safety.
The combustion process has always been considered having the potential for a hazardous event which could lead to personnel injury or loss of production. To mitigate this risk, the process industry is now implementing Safety Instrumented Systems which can identify hazardous operating conditions and correctly respond in such a way to bring the combustion process back to a safe operating condition or implement an automatically controlled shutdown sequence to reduce the risk of operator error causing a catastrophic event. Oxygen and combustible flue gas analyzers are now being utilized in these combustion Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) to identify hazardous operating conditions and automatically return the process to a safe state. The standards of IEC 61511 and API RP 556 will be reviewed as they apply to flue gas analyzers, as well as the process variables of the oxygen and combustible analyzer available for implementation into the SIS system for combustion monitoring, and the resultant actions required to return the process to a safe condition.
Safety instrumented systems angela summers Ahmed Gamal
This document discusses safety instrumented systems (SIS), which are designed to respond to hazardous conditions in industrial plants. An SIS monitors for conditions that could become hazardous and responds by taking actions to prevent or mitigate hazards. Examples provided include a furnace that shuts off fuel valves in response to high pressure and a reactor that opens a coolant valve when temperature rises too high. The document outlines standards for good engineering practices in designing, implementing, and maintaining SIS according to lifecycle phases from planning and design to operations and auditing. Key aspects covered are managing risks to people and procedures, assessing and mitigating risk through assigning safety integrity levels, and proving that SIS designs achieve the desired safety functionality.
This document is an engineering handbook on fire and gas systems published by Kenexis Consulting Corporation. It provides an overview of Kenexis, which is an engineering consulting company focused on implementing safety systems in process plants. The handbook was written by several authors from Kenexis who have experience designing fire and gas systems and safety instrumented systems. It aims to distill best practices for performance-based fire and gas system design based on risk analysis methods from the ISA technical report on this topic. The handbook is intended as a practical reference for everyday use in fire and gas system design.
lain Engels
Product Manager Level & Safety Applications Consultant
Endress+Hauser
Alain werkt bij Endress+ Hauser sinds 1984.
Hij heeft verschillende functies gehad zoals Product Manager van Druk, Temperatuur en Niveaumetingen.
In paralell was hij ook Industrie specialist voor Chemie & Oil & Gas en ATEX, SIL en PED.
Documented evidence with regard to the adherence to the required safety integrity level (SIL) within the scope of the
safety life cycle has to be delivered in order to proof that the imple-mentation of safety systems (Safety Instrumented
Systems SIS) in the process industry has been executed according to professional standards. When carrying out the hazard
analysis and the risk assessment, safety functions (Safety Instrumented Function SIF) will be estab-lished and evaluated
against a required SIL. The achievable SIL both for systematic defaults and for random failures can be established for each
safety function being carried out by means of a safety system. The established SIL has to be in conformity with or better
than the required SIL. The engineers of the weyer group will establish the respective SIL-level of the plant, taking the data
delivered by the manufacturers as the calculation base.
Safety-critical systems are computer systems whose failure could result in injury, death, or environmental damage. Examples include aircraft control systems, nuclear power plant controls, medical devices like pacemakers, and railway signaling systems. These systems require high integrity to avoid hazards and ensure safety. Techniques like developing diverse redundant systems can improve safety by detecting and tolerating a wider range of faults.
This document discusses operational risk management and system safety. It defines key terms like system safety, hazard probability, and hazard severity. It describes the system safety process which involves defining objectives, hazard identification, analysis, risk evaluation, and hazard controls. It also discusses failure modes and effects analysis. Overall, the document provides an overview of operational risk management processes like identifying hazards, assessing and analyzing risks, making control decisions, and supervising risk controls. It discusses how to make risk management decisions and defines terms like identified risk and acceptable risk.
Process Safety Life Cycle Management: Best Practices and ProcessesMd Rahaman
Learn how to transform your current process safety program to deliver intelligent and integrated safety solutions that can directly affect the bottom line, while simultaneously improving process and personnel safety.
This document provides an overview and definitions related to Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS). It discusses the need for SIS to protect personnel, equipment, and the environment from hazardous events in industries like chemical and oil & gas. SIS are designed to reduce the likelihood or impact of emergencies. The document defines common SIS terms and describes the basic components and purpose of SIS, which include sensors to detect process parameters, a logic solver to determine necessary actions, and final control elements like valves to isolate the process. It also discusses the concept of layers of protection to prevent and mitigate hazardous events, with SIS comprising the final active prevention layer.
Practical Safety Instrumentation & Emergency Shutdown Systems for Process Ind...Living Online
COPY THIS LINK INTO YOUR BROWSER FOR MORE INFORMATION: bit.ly/1Htp9ZC
For project managers and engineers involved with hazardous processes, this workshop focuses on the management, planning and execution of automatic safety systems in accordance with IEC 61511, the newly released international standard for process industry safety controls.
IEC 61511 has been recognised by European safety authorities and by USA based process companies as representing the best practices available for the provision of automatic safety systems. The new standard captures many of the well established project and design techniques that have been described since 1996 in ANSI/ISA standard S84 whilst introducing many newer principles based on the master standard IEC 615108. The newly released standard IEC 61511 (published in 3 parts) combines the principles of IEC 61508 and S84 into a practical and easily understood code of practice specifically for end users in the process industries.
This workshop is structured into two major parts to ensure that both managers and engineering staff are trained in the fundamentals of safety system practices. The first part of the workshop, approx the first third, provides an overview of the critical issues involved in managing and implementing safety systems.
WHO SHOULD ATTEND?
Automation/machinery design engineers
Control systems engineers
Chemical or energy process engineers
Instrument/electrical engineers and technicians
Instrument suppliers technical staff
Maintenance supervisors
Project engineers and project managers
COPY THIS LINK INTO YOUR BROWSER FOR MORE INFORMATION: bit.ly/1Htp9ZC
Implementation and application of a Process Safety Management System. This presentation will focus on the history, purpose and scope of a Process Safety Management (PSM) system. Topics covered include:
-Distinctions between personnel and process safety
-Framework and elements of PSM
-Importance of Safety Culture in the implementation and application of a PSM system
-Relevance and importance of regular audits and assessments of PSM systems
Process safety aims to prevent incidents involving hazardous materials that could endanger workers, property, and the environment. It involves applying engineering and operating practices to control hazards. Key elements of process safety management include process hazard analysis, operating procedures, employee participation, training, contractor management, pre-startup safety reviews, mechanical integrity programs, emergency response planning, compliance audits, and incident investigation. The goal is to anticipate, identify, evaluate, and control hazards to protect people and prevent accidents.
The document discusses process safety and functional safety. It covers topics like hazard and risk assessments, safety instrumented systems (SIS), safety integrity levels (SIL), and the safety lifecycle described in standards like IEC 61511. The purpose of process safety management is to reduce the frequency and severity of chemical accidents by implementing layers of protection that can include inherently safer design, equipment reliability, formal safety assessments, operating procedures, training and emergency response. Functional safety focuses specifically on instrumented safety systems and ensuring safety instrumented functions are designed and maintained to a reliability suitable for their risk reduction purpose.
The document discusses burner management systems (BMS) and how programmable electronic systems (PES) can be used for burner control while ensuring safety. It outlines several key requirements for PES-based BMS to be certified, including using redundant safety-related PES, obtaining independent safety certification, and the designer demonstrating proper development and testing practices. The document also describes various safety features that can be designed into BMS, such as input/output monitoring, guarded outputs, processor watchdog timers, and power monitoring. It discusses architectures for safety programmable logic controllers (PLCs) including 1oo1D (one out of one with diagnostics) and 1oo2D (one out of two with diagnostics).
Safety Lifecycle Management - Emerson Exchange 2010 - Meet the Experts Mike Boudreaux
The document discusses process safety and functional safety. It covers many topics related to ensuring safety in industrial processes, including safety lifecycles, risk assessments, safety instrumented systems, standards like IEC 61511, and maintaining safety through proper design, installation, operation and modification of systems.
The document discusses safety instrumentation and safety integrity levels (SILs). It provides examples of major industrial accidents from 1974 to 2005 and their causes. These include failures of safety systems and instrumentation. The document then discusses key aspects of safety instrumented systems (SIS) such as their hardware components, separation from process controls, definition, and role in risk reduction. It introduces SIL ratings from 1 to 4 which define the reliability of a SIS based on its risk reduction factor and probability of failure on demand.
The document discusses Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) and the Safety Life Cycle as defined by ANSI/ISA 84.00.01-2004. It outlines the steps in the Safety Life Cycle from initial Hazard and Risk Assessment to determine Safety Instrumented Functions (SIFs) and required Safety Integrity Levels (SILs), to design, installation, and ongoing maintenance of SIS including functional proof testing. The Safety Life Cycle is meant to guide safety systems through all stages from initial assessment to eventual decommissioning to minimize risk in industrial processes.
The document discusses the key elements of Process Safety Management (PSM), a regulation promulgated by OSHA to prevent chemical disasters like the 1984 Bhopal disaster. It outlines the 14 elements of PSM, which include process hazards analysis, mechanical integrity, compliance audits, and emergency response. For each element, it provides the purpose, requirements, and tips for real-world implementation to help companies effectively achieve the safety goals of the PSM standard.
ADEPP is a tool for configuration management that can be used across the entire lifecycle of a project, from design through operation and maintenance. It improves safety by facilitating communication between disciplines and tracking requirements, verification schemes, activities, and tasks. The tool uses interactive knowledge management on 2D/3D platforms and combined dynamic simulation, consequence modeling, event tree analysis, and fault tree analysis to enhance design quality.
This document explains Safety Integrity Levels (SIL) which are used to quantify safety requirements for Safety Instrumented Systems. It discusses what SIL is, the four SIL levels and their required reliability, how SIL ratings are determined through a risk assessment process, and how hazards are protected against through a layered approach. The document also outlines the SIL life cycle including design, realization, and operation phases, how equipment failures can occur, and how a Safety Instrumented Function's performance is quantified through its Probability of Failure on Demand. It provides information on how components like actuators can be certified as "suitable for use" at a given SIL level and the role of proof and diagnostic testing.
Regulatory modifications have raised important issues in design and use of industrial safety systems. Certain changes in IEC 61508, now being widely implemented, mean that designers and users who desire full compliance must give new consideration to topics such as SIL levels and the transition to new methodologies.
The document discusses how to specify requirements for critical systems based on risk analysis. It explains how to identify risks, analyze and classify them, then derive safety, security, and reliability requirements to reduce risks. For reliability, it describes metrics like probability of failure on demand and mean time to failure that can be used to specify quantitative reliability levels. The goal is to develop requirements that eliminate intolerable risks and minimize other risks given cost and schedule constraints.
This document is an engineering handbook on fire and gas systems published by Kenexis Consulting Corporation. It provides an overview of Kenexis, which is an engineering consulting company focused on implementing safety systems in process plants. The handbook was written by several authors from Kenexis who have experience designing fire and gas systems and safety instrumented systems. It aims to distill best practices for performance-based fire and gas system design based on risk analysis methods from the ISA technical report on this topic. The handbook is intended as a practical reference for everyday use in fire and gas system design.
lain Engels
Product Manager Level & Safety Applications Consultant
Endress+Hauser
Alain werkt bij Endress+ Hauser sinds 1984.
Hij heeft verschillende functies gehad zoals Product Manager van Druk, Temperatuur en Niveaumetingen.
In paralell was hij ook Industrie specialist voor Chemie & Oil & Gas en ATEX, SIL en PED.
Documented evidence with regard to the adherence to the required safety integrity level (SIL) within the scope of the
safety life cycle has to be delivered in order to proof that the imple-mentation of safety systems (Safety Instrumented
Systems SIS) in the process industry has been executed according to professional standards. When carrying out the hazard
analysis and the risk assessment, safety functions (Safety Instrumented Function SIF) will be estab-lished and evaluated
against a required SIL. The achievable SIL both for systematic defaults and for random failures can be established for each
safety function being carried out by means of a safety system. The established SIL has to be in conformity with or better
than the required SIL. The engineers of the weyer group will establish the respective SIL-level of the plant, taking the data
delivered by the manufacturers as the calculation base.
Safety-critical systems are computer systems whose failure could result in injury, death, or environmental damage. Examples include aircraft control systems, nuclear power plant controls, medical devices like pacemakers, and railway signaling systems. These systems require high integrity to avoid hazards and ensure safety. Techniques like developing diverse redundant systems can improve safety by detecting and tolerating a wider range of faults.
This document discusses operational risk management and system safety. It defines key terms like system safety, hazard probability, and hazard severity. It describes the system safety process which involves defining objectives, hazard identification, analysis, risk evaluation, and hazard controls. It also discusses failure modes and effects analysis. Overall, the document provides an overview of operational risk management processes like identifying hazards, assessing and analyzing risks, making control decisions, and supervising risk controls. It discusses how to make risk management decisions and defines terms like identified risk and acceptable risk.
Process Safety Life Cycle Management: Best Practices and ProcessesMd Rahaman
Learn how to transform your current process safety program to deliver intelligent and integrated safety solutions that can directly affect the bottom line, while simultaneously improving process and personnel safety.
This document provides an overview and definitions related to Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS). It discusses the need for SIS to protect personnel, equipment, and the environment from hazardous events in industries like chemical and oil & gas. SIS are designed to reduce the likelihood or impact of emergencies. The document defines common SIS terms and describes the basic components and purpose of SIS, which include sensors to detect process parameters, a logic solver to determine necessary actions, and final control elements like valves to isolate the process. It also discusses the concept of layers of protection to prevent and mitigate hazardous events, with SIS comprising the final active prevention layer.
Practical Safety Instrumentation & Emergency Shutdown Systems for Process Ind...Living Online
COPY THIS LINK INTO YOUR BROWSER FOR MORE INFORMATION: bit.ly/1Htp9ZC
For project managers and engineers involved with hazardous processes, this workshop focuses on the management, planning and execution of automatic safety systems in accordance with IEC 61511, the newly released international standard for process industry safety controls.
IEC 61511 has been recognised by European safety authorities and by USA based process companies as representing the best practices available for the provision of automatic safety systems. The new standard captures many of the well established project and design techniques that have been described since 1996 in ANSI/ISA standard S84 whilst introducing many newer principles based on the master standard IEC 615108. The newly released standard IEC 61511 (published in 3 parts) combines the principles of IEC 61508 and S84 into a practical and easily understood code of practice specifically for end users in the process industries.
This workshop is structured into two major parts to ensure that both managers and engineering staff are trained in the fundamentals of safety system practices. The first part of the workshop, approx the first third, provides an overview of the critical issues involved in managing and implementing safety systems.
WHO SHOULD ATTEND?
Automation/machinery design engineers
Control systems engineers
Chemical or energy process engineers
Instrument/electrical engineers and technicians
Instrument suppliers technical staff
Maintenance supervisors
Project engineers and project managers
COPY THIS LINK INTO YOUR BROWSER FOR MORE INFORMATION: bit.ly/1Htp9ZC
Implementation and application of a Process Safety Management System. This presentation will focus on the history, purpose and scope of a Process Safety Management (PSM) system. Topics covered include:
-Distinctions between personnel and process safety
-Framework and elements of PSM
-Importance of Safety Culture in the implementation and application of a PSM system
-Relevance and importance of regular audits and assessments of PSM systems
Process safety aims to prevent incidents involving hazardous materials that could endanger workers, property, and the environment. It involves applying engineering and operating practices to control hazards. Key elements of process safety management include process hazard analysis, operating procedures, employee participation, training, contractor management, pre-startup safety reviews, mechanical integrity programs, emergency response planning, compliance audits, and incident investigation. The goal is to anticipate, identify, evaluate, and control hazards to protect people and prevent accidents.
The document discusses process safety and functional safety. It covers topics like hazard and risk assessments, safety instrumented systems (SIS), safety integrity levels (SIL), and the safety lifecycle described in standards like IEC 61511. The purpose of process safety management is to reduce the frequency and severity of chemical accidents by implementing layers of protection that can include inherently safer design, equipment reliability, formal safety assessments, operating procedures, training and emergency response. Functional safety focuses specifically on instrumented safety systems and ensuring safety instrumented functions are designed and maintained to a reliability suitable for their risk reduction purpose.
The document discusses burner management systems (BMS) and how programmable electronic systems (PES) can be used for burner control while ensuring safety. It outlines several key requirements for PES-based BMS to be certified, including using redundant safety-related PES, obtaining independent safety certification, and the designer demonstrating proper development and testing practices. The document also describes various safety features that can be designed into BMS, such as input/output monitoring, guarded outputs, processor watchdog timers, and power monitoring. It discusses architectures for safety programmable logic controllers (PLCs) including 1oo1D (one out of one with diagnostics) and 1oo2D (one out of two with diagnostics).
Safety Lifecycle Management - Emerson Exchange 2010 - Meet the Experts Mike Boudreaux
The document discusses process safety and functional safety. It covers many topics related to ensuring safety in industrial processes, including safety lifecycles, risk assessments, safety instrumented systems, standards like IEC 61511, and maintaining safety through proper design, installation, operation and modification of systems.
The document discusses safety instrumentation and safety integrity levels (SILs). It provides examples of major industrial accidents from 1974 to 2005 and their causes. These include failures of safety systems and instrumentation. The document then discusses key aspects of safety instrumented systems (SIS) such as their hardware components, separation from process controls, definition, and role in risk reduction. It introduces SIL ratings from 1 to 4 which define the reliability of a SIS based on its risk reduction factor and probability of failure on demand.
The document discusses Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) and the Safety Life Cycle as defined by ANSI/ISA 84.00.01-2004. It outlines the steps in the Safety Life Cycle from initial Hazard and Risk Assessment to determine Safety Instrumented Functions (SIFs) and required Safety Integrity Levels (SILs), to design, installation, and ongoing maintenance of SIS including functional proof testing. The Safety Life Cycle is meant to guide safety systems through all stages from initial assessment to eventual decommissioning to minimize risk in industrial processes.
The document discusses the key elements of Process Safety Management (PSM), a regulation promulgated by OSHA to prevent chemical disasters like the 1984 Bhopal disaster. It outlines the 14 elements of PSM, which include process hazards analysis, mechanical integrity, compliance audits, and emergency response. For each element, it provides the purpose, requirements, and tips for real-world implementation to help companies effectively achieve the safety goals of the PSM standard.
ADEPP is a tool for configuration management that can be used across the entire lifecycle of a project, from design through operation and maintenance. It improves safety by facilitating communication between disciplines and tracking requirements, verification schemes, activities, and tasks. The tool uses interactive knowledge management on 2D/3D platforms and combined dynamic simulation, consequence modeling, event tree analysis, and fault tree analysis to enhance design quality.
This document explains Safety Integrity Levels (SIL) which are used to quantify safety requirements for Safety Instrumented Systems. It discusses what SIL is, the four SIL levels and their required reliability, how SIL ratings are determined through a risk assessment process, and how hazards are protected against through a layered approach. The document also outlines the SIL life cycle including design, realization, and operation phases, how equipment failures can occur, and how a Safety Instrumented Function's performance is quantified through its Probability of Failure on Demand. It provides information on how components like actuators can be certified as "suitable for use" at a given SIL level and the role of proof and diagnostic testing.
Regulatory modifications have raised important issues in design and use of industrial safety systems. Certain changes in IEC 61508, now being widely implemented, mean that designers and users who desire full compliance must give new consideration to topics such as SIL levels and the transition to new methodologies.
The document discusses how to specify requirements for critical systems based on risk analysis. It explains how to identify risks, analyze and classify them, then derive safety, security, and reliability requirements to reduce risks. For reliability, it describes metrics like probability of failure on demand and mean time to failure that can be used to specify quantitative reliability levels. The goal is to develop requirements that eliminate intolerable risks and minimize other risks given cost and schedule constraints.
Risk-based design aims to reduce risks of major accidents during a project's lifecycle. It identifies safety critical elements and sets performance standards for managing them. ADEPP is a tool that facilitates this process. It uses risk analysis to identify safety critical systems. Performance standards are set online and critical tasks are assigned and tracked for managing safety critical elements throughout the different project phases. The ADEPP monitor provides secure online monitoring and communication between stakeholders.
Risk-based design aims to reduce risks of major accidents during a project's lifecycle. It identifies safety critical elements and sets performance standards for managing them. The ADEPP method uses tools like hazard analysis, consequence modeling, and an online monitoring system to systematically identify safety critical systems, determine appropriate performance standards, and track actions over a project's lifecycle to maintain risk reduction.
Webinar | APM Best Practices - Effectively managing the safety lifecycleStork
Effectively managing the safety lifecycle requires teamwork between multiple disciplines, departments and companies, but it shouldn’t require multiple solutions. See how you can consolidate the entire safety lifecycle into a streamlined solution ensuring risk is reduced, instrumented systems are available and compliance requirements are met. The “cradle to grave” lifecycle approach that is enabled by the APM Safety work process provides visibility across the organization to what teams are doing, and how well their doing it.
In this third webinar in a series about APM, Stork, SOCAR Turkey and GE Digital share their insights on process safety best practices, from various perspectives: the process, the solution and the culture.
The article discusses writing a Safety Requirement Specification (SRS), which is the last stage of the analysis phase for a Safety Instrumented System (SIS) lifecycle. It outlines the key components of an SRS, including input information, functional requirements, and safety integrity requirements for each safety instrumented function. The article provides examples of the types of details to include in an SRS, such as the safe state of the process, sources of demand on the system, target safety integrity levels, and requirements for resetting the system. Developing a thorough SRS according to the findings of the hazard and risk assessment is important, as it forms the input for the design and realization phase of the SIS lifecycle.
This document discusses safety standards for critical systems and proposes a new concept called Assured Reliability and Resilience Level (ARRL). It notes that while safety standards aim to reduce risk, their requirements differ across domains. The document argues that Safety Integrity Levels (SIL) alone are not sufficient and that Quality of Service is a more holistic criterion. It also notes standards provide little guidance on composing systems from components. The ARRL concept aims to address these issues and complement SIL by considering factors like component trustworthiness and fault behavior. The document suggests ARRL could help foster cross-domain safety engineering.
SIL Awareness | Introduction to Safety Life-Cycle | IEC - 61508 & IEC- 61511 ...Gaurav Singh Rajput
This document provides an overview of the safety lifecycle (SLC) process as defined in IEC 61508 and IEC 61511 standards. The SLC consists of three main phases - analysis, realization, and operation. The analysis phase involves identifying process hazards, estimating risks, and determining safety instrumented functions (SIFs) required to reduce risk to a tolerable level. Key activities in the analysis phase include hazard identification techniques like HAZOP and assessing the likelihood and consequences of hazardous events. The realization phase focuses on designing, implementing, and testing the safety instrumented systems (SIS) to achieve the required SIFs. The operation phase centers around maintaining and managing the SIS to ensure ongoing functional safety
This document provides an overview of APS ACIS (Advanced Photon Source Accelerator Control Interlock System) from the perspective of a functional safety assessor.
The original ACIS design, implemented in 1992 before functional safety standards, is examined against IEC 61508. While the design has strong safety practices, some areas could be improved like requirements tracking.
The upgraded LEA ACIS addresses many observations by clearly identifying safety functions and requirements. Reliability is also a key part of standards not fully addressed in original ACIS.
Overall APS has a very safe system but original ACIS could be strengthened by fully addressing requirements tracking, reliability calculations, and accounting for all components in safety functions
There are four SILs — SIL 1, SIL 2, SIL 3, and SIL 4. The higher the SIL, the greater the risk of failure. And the greater the risk of failure, the stricter the safety requirements
Safety instrumented systems (SIS) are designed to respond to hazardous conditions in industrial plants. An SIS monitors for conditions that could lead to hazards and responds by taking actions to prevent or mitigate hazards. Examples include high fuel gas pressure shutting off main valves or high reactor temperature opening a coolant valve. Standards like ISA 84.01 and IEC 61508/61511 provide guidelines for engineering practices to ensure SIS integrity through their lifecycle from planning and design to operations and maintenance. A key aspect is assessing risk and assigning a safety integrity level to guide system reliability design.
The document discusses validation of critical systems, including reliability validation using operational profiles and reliability growth models, safety assurance through arguments and dependability cases, and security assessment. It explains that validation costs for critical systems are higher due to additional validation processes needed to demonstrate a system meets its dependability requirements through a dependability case.
1) Condition monitoring of transmission and distribution networks is important to reduce outage costs and ensure reliable electricity delivery. It helps identify equipment failures early to plan maintenance and avoid unplanned outages.
2) When selecting a condition monitoring method, utilities must balance costs of the monitoring technique against costs of missed failures and false alarms. Continuous online monitoring detects more failures but yields more false alarms than periodic monitoring.
3) A full asset management process involves setting performance standards, assessing asset condition and risks, prioritizing maintenance based on condition and risk levels, and planning work accordingly. This helps utilities optimize maintenance planning and budgets.
This document provides an overview of functional safety. It begins with definitions of functional safety and discusses relevant standards like IEC 61508. It then explains the functional safety lifecycle and certification process. This includes performing a hazard and risk analysis, defining safety requirements, and conducting audits. Examples of functional safety products are also provided. The document discusses how functional safety applies to electrical and programmable electronic safety systems and their role in risk reduction. It outlines approaches to achieve hardware safety integrity through techniques like redundancy, detection, and reliability.
Technical Paper for ASPF 2012 - Choosing the right SISAlvin CJ Chin
This document discusses choosing the right safety instrumented system (SIS) for process plants. It notes that plant owners must balance safety, profitability, and minimizing downtime. The best SIS options minimize unnecessary shutdowns during maintenance and upgrades while still providing high safety (SIL3) protection. Well-designed standalone SIS that permit online maintenance and upgrades without shutting down the entire plant can save millions of dollars in avoided downtime costs each day. The document advocates that plant owners directly select the most suitable SIS rather than relying only on engineering contractors.
This document provides an introduction to functional safety and an overview of IEC 61508, an international standard on functional safety. It defines functional safety as safety that depends on a system operating correctly in response to inputs. Functional safety is achieved through safety functions performed by safety-related systems. IEC 61508 provides a framework for achieving functional safety in electrical, electronic, and programmable electronic systems by defining safety integrity levels and requiring safety lifecycle activities like hazard and risk analysis. The standard can be applied directly or serve as the basis for other functional safety standards.
ARRL: A Criterion for Composable Safety and Systems EngineeringVincenzo De Florio
While safety engineering standards define rigorous and controllable
processes for system development, safety standards’ differences in distinct
domains are non-negligible. This paper focuses in particular on the aviation,
automotive, and railway standards, all related to the transportation market.
Many are the reasons for the said differences, ranging from historical reasons,
heuristic and established practices, and legal frameworks, but also from the
psychological perception of the safety risks. In particular we argue that the
Safety Integrity Levels are not sufficient to be used as a top level requirement
for developing a safety-critical system. We argue that Quality of Service is a
more generic criterion that takes the trustworthiness as perceived by users better
into account. In addition, safety engineering standards provide very little
guidance on how to compose safe systems from components, while this is the
established engineering practice. In this paper we develop a novel concept
called Assured Reliability and Resilience Level as a criterion that takes the
industrial practice into account and show how it complements the Safety
Integrity Level concept.
Critical System Specification in Software Engineering SE17koolkampus
The document discusses requirements for system reliability specification, including both functional and non-functional requirements. It describes various reliability metrics such as availability, probability of failure on demand, and mean time to failure that can be used to quantitatively specify reliability. It also emphasizes that reliability specifications should consider the consequences of different types of failures.
Similar to Reliability Instrumented System | Arrelic Insights (20)
Maintcon 2018 - Deepak Sahoo, CEO - Arrelic PresentationArrelic
The document discusses how machine learning, artificial intelligence, and the industrial internet of things will change operations and maintenance practices in manufacturing. It outlines how integrating sensors, data collection, analytics, and machine learning can enable remote monitoring, real-time optimization, continuous improvement, and predictive maintenance to improve operations. The integration of these technologies is poised to disrupt industries and drive business transformation.
isk-Based Inspection (RBI) is a systematic approach that enables users to make informed business decisions regarding inspection and maintenance expenditure. It identifies, assesses and maps industrial risks (due to corrosion and stress cracking), which can compromise equipment integrity in both pressurized equipment and structural elements.
RBI combines the principles of risk with operational experience to obtain a safe and cost effective inspection program targeting inspection where and when it is needed. Also addresses risks that can be controlled through proper inspections and analysis.
Arrelic is a fast-growing deep technology firm aiming to bring the next level of IoT based sensor technology to transform the mode of manufacturing operation and maintenance practice of various industries with extensive expertise in Reliability Engineering, Predictive Maintenance, Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Sensors, Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence.
We provide a single ecosystem for catering all industry needs from Consulting to IoT and Analytics as well as providing Training and Development courses for different stakeholders.
We aim to help manufacturing industries to improve their overall plant productivity, reliability and minimize total production cost by 25-30% by eliminating machine downtime, lightening management decisions by analyzing the machine data with right mind and expertise; for a worry free operation.
Expert and well informed in Ferro-alloys industry Building a program that is most financial viable and long term sustainable
Single point contact for building strategy and providing solutions
Over 15+ years of combined experience Bringing the best practices from 16 industries and 5 continents
ARLYTIC™ is a big data based multi-connected IoT analytics platform offers unprecedented advantages for machine manufactures as well as the plant managers who are end-users of the machines to avoid machine downtime through analysing the sensors data.
ARLYTIC™ relies on collecting data on the edge to uncover actionable insights, using the right tools and techniques, at the right time, to help a organization achieve its most desired business outcomes.
Asset Performance Management (APM) is a methodology that focuses on maximizing asset performance, optimizing operation and maintenance costs, and mitigating asset failure risks. It ensures efficient asset lifecycle decision-making to optimize value. APM helps achieve goals like improved safety, compliance, and profitability. Arrelic is a firm that provides APM consulting, analytics platforms, IoT solutions, and training to help clients improve plant productivity, reliability, and reduce costs by 25-30% through eliminating downtime and optimizing asset maintenance.
Preventive Maintenance (PM) Optimization increases equipment reliability by uniquely identifying potential gaps in PM performance and frequencies. The process lowers overall facility maintenance costs by comparing site PMs to industry best practices.
Arrelic end-to-end Reliability Management allows you to;
Identify and rectify equipment problems before they happen, Reduce maintenance costs and unplanned downtime.
RCM is used to develop scheduled maintenance plans in an efficient and cost-effective manner that will provide an acceptable level of operability and risk. It focuses on processes and systems to reduce the overall cost to maintain and operate assets. Arrelic Consulting assists industries in integrating assets and increasing return on investment by enhanced asset performance and reliability.
Maintenance strategy development and optimisation through Critical Asset Ranking, RCM Approach and cost benefit analysis ensures you the best maintenance plan.
rrelic has developed a highly effective Total Reliability Framework for the implementation of reliability methods, tools and services in order to achieve your desired end results.
Total reliability Framework (TRF) Provides a management system for all reliability and Maintenance activities; focus on improving the performance of both the personnel and the plant equipment.
Arrelic is a predictive analytics startup firm that helps manufacturing industries improve plant productivity, reliability, and reduce costs through approaches like predictive maintenance. It offers predictive analytics services using tools like vibration analysis and infrared thermography. Arrelic also provides consulting services in reliability engineering, asset management, and training to optimize asset performance. Its goal is to create a world-class team through graduate programs, experience transfers, and talent development.
This document discusses lean manufacturing and Industry 4.0. It summarizes lean manufacturing in 10 dimensions grouped into 4 factors related to suppliers, customers, processes, and control/human factors. Industry 4.0 uses cyber-physical systems and internet technologies to enable mass customization. The document examines how Industry 4.0 technologies can enable each of the 10 lean manufacturing dimensions by facilitating real-time communication and data sharing across the value chain. It provides an overview of Arrelic, an IoT and analytics company that aims to help manufacturers improve productivity and reliability through predictive maintenance and machine learning techniques.
Benchmarking is the process of measuring products, services, and processes against those of organizations known to be leaders in one or more aspects of their operations.
It is a way of discovering what is the best performance being achieved – whether in a particular company, by a competitor or by an entirely different industry. This information can then be used to identify gaps in an organization’s processes in order to achieve a competitive advantage.
Benchmarking can help you identify areas, systems, or processes for improvements—either incremental improvements or dramatic improvements.
Total Quality Management (TQM) | Arrelic InsightsArrelic
Total quality management is a management system for a customer focused organization that involves all employee in continual improvement of all aspects of the organization. TQM uses strategy, data, and effective communication to integrate the quality principles into the culture and activities of the organization.
Dust collection systems are widely used in mineral processing plants to control dust and lower worker exposure. Local exhaust ventilation systems (LEVs) are commonly used to capture dust at the source through ductwork and transport it to filtering devices. This prevents dust from contaminating the plant atmosphere and workers. LEV systems use negative pressure to capture dust before it escapes processing operations. Key areas that generate dust include transfer points, specific processes like crushing and drying, operations with air displacement, and outdoor stockpiles disturbed by mining activities.
5S is a workplace organization method that consists of five Japanese words: seiri, seiton, seiso, seiketsu, and shitsuke. The steps are: 1) sort, 2) straighten, 3) shine, 4) standardize, and 5) sustain. 5S aims to establish order and discipline in the workplace through visual controls and labels to reduce waste and improve safety, quality and efficiency. Implementing 5S provides benefits like increased productivity, improved safety and quality, and reduced costs through waste elimination.
Motor Current Signature Analysis (MCSA) | Arrelic InsightsArrelic
Motor-current signature analysis (MCSA) is a non-destructive technique that analyzes current waveforms to detect mechanical and electrical problems in motors and other electric equipment. It can identify issues like rotor bar faults, stator faults, and phase imbalances. MCSA involves measuring current and voltage remotely using transformers, then processing the data with fast Fourier transforms to obtain a baseline and detect faults by comparing to the baseline. It has applications for diagnosing problems in motors, motor-operated valves, solenoid valves, and other machines.
5S is a methodology for organizing the workplace to improve safety and efficiency. It involves five Japanese words that start with S: seiri (sort), seiton (set in order), seiso (shine), seiketsu (standardize), and shitsuke (sustain). Implementing 5S helps eliminate waste, increase productivity, improve safety, and engage employees. It is a low-cost method that is the foundation for continuous improvement programs like lean manufacturing and total productive maintenance.
The document discusses adopting a defect elimination and condition-based maintenance program to achieve the lowest lifecycle costs. It explains that more than 90% of rotating machinery failures are random and unpredictable without condition monitoring. Defect elimination aims to avoid failures from the design process through operation by eliminating any opportunities for defects. Condition-based maintenance allows potential issues to be detected early through monitoring technologies like vibration analysis and oil testing, providing more time for planning repairs before functional or catastrophic failure.
Asset integrity management (AIM) ensures that assets perform their planned functions successfully and productively throughout their lifecycles. AIM programs aim to anticipate safety issues and minimize risks of failure for critical infrastructure. Effective AIM considers risks at all stages from design to decommissioning. While some risks can never be eliminated, systematic risk management can significantly reduce likelihood and impacts of failures.
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingAftab Hussain
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 6. In this session, we will cover Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI webinar offers an in-depth exploration of leveraging cutting-edge technologies for test automation within the UiPath platform. Attendees will delve into the integration of generative AI, a test automation solution, with Open AI advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Throughout the session, participants will discover how this synergy empowers testers to automate repetitive tasks, enhance testing accuracy, and expedite the software testing life cycle. Topics covered include the seamless integration process, practical use cases, and the benefits of harnessing AI-driven automation for UiPath testing initiatives. By attending this webinar, testers, and automation professionals can gain valuable insights into harnessing the power of AI to optimize their test automation workflows within the UiPath ecosystem, ultimately driving efficiency and quality in software development processes.
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into integrating generative AI.
2. Understanding how this integration enhances test automation within the UiPath platform
3. Practical demonstrations
4. Exploration of real-world use cases illustrating the benefits of AI-driven test automation for UiPath
Topics covered:
What is generative AI
Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath integration with generative AI
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Dr. Sean Tan, Head of Data Science, Changi Airport Group
Discover how Changi Airport Group (CAG) leverages graph technologies and generative AI to revolutionize their search capabilities. This session delves into the unique search needs of CAG’s diverse passengers and customers, showcasing how graph data structures enhance the accuracy and relevance of AI-generated search results, mitigating the risk of “hallucinations” and improving the overall customer journey.
Observability Concepts EVERY Developer Should Know -- DeveloperWeek Europe.pdfPaige Cruz
Monitoring and observability aren’t traditionally found in software curriculums and many of us cobble this knowledge together from whatever vendor or ecosystem we were first introduced to and whatever is a part of your current company’s observability stack.
While the dev and ops silo continues to crumble….many organizations still relegate monitoring & observability as the purview of ops, infra and SRE teams. This is a mistake - achieving a highly observable system requires collaboration up and down the stack.
I, a former op, would like to extend an invitation to all application developers to join the observability party will share these foundational concepts to build on:
Sudheer Mechineni, Head of Application Frameworks, Standard Chartered Bank
Discover how Standard Chartered Bank harnessed the power of Neo4j to transform complex data access challenges into a dynamic, scalable graph database solution. This keynote will cover their journey from initial adoption to deploying a fully automated, enterprise-grade causal cluster, highlighting key strategies for modelling organisational changes and ensuring robust disaster recovery. Learn how these innovations have not only enhanced Standard Chartered Bank’s data infrastructure but also positioned them as pioneers in the banking sector’s adoption of graph technology.
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy SurveyTrustArc
How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024?
In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores.
See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe.
This webinar will review:
- The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey
- The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024
- Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program
AI 101: An Introduction to the Basics and Impact of Artificial IntelligenceIndexBug
Imagine a world where machines not only perform tasks but also learn, adapt, and make decisions. This is the promise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), a technology that's not just enhancing our lives but revolutionizing entire industries.
Best 20 SEO Techniques To Improve Website Visibility In SERPPixlogix Infotech
Boost your website's visibility with proven SEO techniques! Our latest blog dives into essential strategies to enhance your online presence, increase traffic, and rank higher on search engines. From keyword optimization to quality content creation, learn how to make your site stand out in the crowded digital landscape. Discover actionable tips and expert insights to elevate your SEO game.
Building Production Ready Search Pipelines with Spark and MilvusZilliz
Spark is the widely used ETL tool for processing, indexing and ingesting data to serving stack for search. Milvus is the production-ready open-source vector database. In this talk we will show how to use Spark to process unstructured data to extract vector representations, and push the vectors to Milvus vector database for search serving.
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdfMalak Abu Hammad
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
“An Outlook of the Ongoing and Future Relationship between Blockchain Technologies and Process-aware Information Systems.” Invited talk at the joint workshop on Blockchain for Information Systems (BC4IS) and Blockchain for Trusted Data Sharing (B4TDS), co-located with with the 36th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), 3 June 2024, Limassol, Cyprus.
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAUpanagenda
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-and-domino-license-cost-reduction-in-the-world-of-dlau/
The introduction of DLAU and the CCB & CCX licensing model caused quite a stir in the HCL community. As a Notes and Domino customer, you may have faced challenges with unexpected user counts and license costs. You probably have questions on how this new licensing approach works and how to benefit from it. Most importantly, you likely have budget constraints and want to save money where possible. Don’t worry, we can help with all of this!
We’ll show you how to fix common misconfigurations that cause higher-than-expected user counts, and how to identify accounts which you can deactivate to save money. There are also frequent patterns that can cause unnecessary cost, like using a person document instead of a mail-in for shared mailboxes. We’ll provide examples and solutions for those as well. And naturally we’ll explain the new licensing model.
Join HCL Ambassador Marc Thomas in this webinar with a special guest appearance from Franz Walder. It will give you the tools and know-how to stay on top of what is going on with Domino licensing. You will be able lower your cost through an optimized configuration and keep it low going forward.
These topics will be covered
- Reducing license cost by finding and fixing misconfigurations and superfluous accounts
- How do CCB and CCX licenses really work?
- Understanding the DLAU tool and how to best utilize it
- Tips for common problem areas, like team mailboxes, functional/test users, etc
- Practical examples and best practices to implement right away
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!SOFTTECHHUB
As the digital landscape continually evolves, operating systems play a critical role in shaping user experiences and productivity. The launch of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 marks a significant milestone, offering a robust alternative to traditional systems such as Windows 11. This article delves into the essence of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, exploring its unique features, advantages, and how it stands as a compelling choice for both casual users and tech enthusiasts.
Cosa hanno in comune un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ?Speck&Tech
ABSTRACT: A prima vista, un mattoncino Lego e la backdoor XZ potrebbero avere in comune il fatto di essere entrambi blocchi di costruzione, o dipendenze di progetti creativi e software. La realtà è che un mattoncino Lego e il caso della backdoor XZ hanno molto di più di tutto ciò in comune.
Partecipate alla presentazione per immergervi in una storia di interoperabilità, standard e formati aperti, per poi discutere del ruolo importante che i contributori hanno in una comunità open source sostenibile.
BIO: Sostenitrice del software libero e dei formati standard e aperti. È stata un membro attivo dei progetti Fedora e openSUSE e ha co-fondato l'Associazione LibreItalia dove è stata coinvolta in diversi eventi, migrazioni e formazione relativi a LibreOffice. In precedenza ha lavorato a migrazioni e corsi di formazione su LibreOffice per diverse amministrazioni pubbliche e privati. Da gennaio 2020 lavora in SUSE come Software Release Engineer per Uyuni e SUSE Manager e quando non segue la sua passione per i computer e per Geeko coltiva la sua curiosità per l'astronomia (da cui deriva il suo nickname deneb_alpha).
2. INTRODUCTION
INSIGHTS
A Reliability Instrumented System
consists of an engineered set of
hardware and software controls
which are especially used on critical
process systems safety instrumented
systems are most often used in
process that is refineries chemical
nuclear etc. facilities to provide
protection such as high fuel gas
pressure initiates action to close the
main fuel gas valve.
High reactor temperature initiates
action to open cooling media valve
high distillation column pressure
initiates action to open a pressure
vent valve a critical process system
can be identified as one which once
running and an operational problem
occurs may need to be put into a
safe state to avoid adverse safety
health and environmental State.
Any consequences a safe state is a
process condition whether the
process is operating or shut down.
such that a hazardous SH and even
cannot occur examples of critical
processes have been common since
the beginning of the industrial age
one of the more well-known critical
processes is the operation of a steam
boiler critical parts of the process
would include the lighting of the
burners controlling the level of water
in the drum and controlling the
steam pressure what it shall for the
functional requirements and how
well it must perform the safety
integrity requirements.
It may be determined from hazard
and operability studies top layers of
protection analysis lopa risk graphs
and so on all techniques are
mentioned in IEC 61508 1508 during
its design construction installation
and operation it is necessary to verify
that these requirements are the
functional requirements may be
verified by design reviews such as
failure modes effects and criticality
analysis. There are various types of
testing for example factory
acceptance testing site acceptance
testing and regular functional testing
the safety integrity requirements
may be verified by reliability analysis
for it that operates on demand it is
often the probability of failure on
demand PFD that is calculated in
the design phase.
The PFD may be calculated using
generic reliability data for example
from O Rhetta later on the initial PFD
estimates may be updated with field
experience from the specific planned
in question It is not possible to
address all factors that advocacy is
reliability through reliability
calculations, it is therefore also
necessary to have adequate
measures in place for example
procedures and competence to
avoid reveal and correct the related
failures.
3. HOW IT WORKS?
The safe state must be achieved in a timely manner or within
the process safety time the correct operation of a sis requires
a series of equipment to function properly.
it must have sensors capable of detecting abnormal
operating conditions such as high flow low level or incorrect
valve positioning.
A logic solver is required to receive the sensor input signals
make appropriate decisions based on the nature of the
signals and change its outputs according to user-defined
logic the logic solver may use electrical electronic or
programmable electronic equipment, such as relays trip
amplifiers or programmable logic controllers next the change
of the logic solver outputs results in the final elements taking
action on the process for example closing a valve to bring it
to a safe state support systems such as power instrument air
and communications are generally required for a science
opera.
The support system should be designed to provide the
required integrity and reliability international standard IEC
61508 in 2003 to provide guidance to end-users on the
application of safety instrumented systems in the process
industries. This standard is based on IEC 61508 a generic
standard for design construction and operation of electrical
flash electronic / programmable electronic systems other
industry sectors may also have standards that are based on
IEC 61508 such as IEC 62,000 and 61 machinery systems IEC
sixty 2425 for railway signalling systems IEC 61508 team for
nuclear systems and ISO 26262 for road vehicles currently a
draft international standard
A huzzah study typically reveals hazardous scenarios which
require further risk mitigating measures which are to be achieved
by sites via a layer of protection analysis Lopa or some other
approved method integrity levels.
Illinois is defined for the sites in their respective scenarios the
integrity levels may be categorized as safety integrity level fill or
environmental integrity level aisle based on hisab study
recommendations and Illinois.
Rating of the site the engineering including the be pcs and thus if
design for each unit operation is finalized sis is engineered to
perform specific control functions to failsafe or maintain safe
operation of a process when an acceptable or dangerous
conditions occur Reliability Instrumented System must be
independent of all other control systems that control the same
equipment in order to ensure Esaias functionality.
It is not compromised SIF is composed of the same types of
control elements including sensors logic solvers actuators and
other control equipment as a basic process control system DP CS.
However, all of the control elements in an SIS are dedicated solely
to the proper functioning of the specific control functions
performed these are called Reliability Instrumented System.
They are implemented as part of an overall risk reduction strategy
which is intended to eliminate the likelihood of a previously
identified SH an event that could range from minor equipment
damage up to an event involving an uncontrolled catastrophic
release of energy and/or materials.
4. NEXT STEP
THE MAIN FOCUS
A Reliability instrumented function or SIF is
defined in IEC code as a function to be
implemented by a sis or the system itself
which is intended to automatically achieve or
maintain a safe State for the process with
respect to a specific hazardous event.
Basically the SIF is an independent safety loop
or an interlock that automatically brings
processes to a safe state in response to specific
events here we have a component of the larger
sis which is responsible for bringing its
particular control group back to a safe State so
this is nested underneath of the SIS so you can
think of this is all like a system and then
maybe there's even a subsystem underneath of
that with the the sis and the SIF underneath of
that so now we're really starting to kind of see
a picture form which brings us back to our
topic of the day which is of course. SIL so that
third level is safety integrity level the safety
integrity level or SIL is the safety integrity level
of a specific safety instrumented function
which is being implemented by a safety
instrumented system so once again we see
that successive tier type mentality continuing
here with sis then SIF then a SIL analysis
underneath of that so in other words SIL is a
measure of risk reduction provided by a
specific safety instrumented function each
device required to perform a safety
instrumented function must have a sylvatica
to the risk that's assigned to the entire system
so what you have is the system and the
conditions that it is exposed to or has to
operate under and that will dictate what the
necessary SIL value needs to be of those safety
instrumented functions underneath of it so as
we said the whole process is simply about
eliminating or reducing risk IEC defines risk as
the likelihood of a defined consequence
occurring within a known period or under
specific conditions this particular calculation is
a relatively simple equation that just multiplies
the probability of harm and the severity of that
harm to come up with that risk factor you can
see from the graphic here that as either
probability goes up or severity goes up so does
your risk so risk equals probability times
severity again a relatively simple equation but
unfortunately the other equations necessary to
determine a sylvalum belen
OBJECTIVES
• To have intensive comprehension
of utilitarian functional safety
concepts and codes (IEC)
• To encourage ability to speak with
safety engineers and specialists in
the field
5. PROCESS
A big project involves overseeing a
lot of moving parts, oftentimes from
different people. To have a successful
rollout, project managers rely on a
well-crafted project plan to ensure
objectives are met on time and on
budget.
A project plan is a formal approved
document which is used to define
project goals, outline the project
scope, monitor deliverables, and
mitigate risks. It must answer basic
questions like what is the purpose of
the project, what activities are
involved, who will be responsible for
what, and when is it expected to be
completed? It is not to be confused
with the Gantt chart, which shows
project deliverables against the
timeline. The said chart is only one
part of the project plan.
A big project involves overseeing a
lot of moving parts, oftentimes from
different people. To have a successful
rollout, project managers rely on a
well-crafted project plan to ensure
objectives are met on time and on
budget. A project plan is a formal
approved document which is used to
define project goals, outline the
project scope, monitor deliverables,
and mitigate risks. It must answer
basic questions like what is the
purpose of the project, what
activities are involved, who will be
responsible for what, and when is it
expected to be completed?
It is not to be confused with the
Gantt chart, which shows project
deliverables against the timeline. The
said chart is only one part of the
project plan.
6. There are different kinds of testing
for instance production line
acknowledgment testing site
acknowledgment testing and
customary practical testing the
security trustworthiness prerequisites
might be checked by dependability
examination for it that works on
request it is frequently the likelihood
of disappointment on request PFD
that is figured in the plan stage.
These can be outlined as takes after:
Poor harmonization of definition
over the diverse gauges bodies
which use RIS Process-situated
measurements for induction of RIS
Estimation of RIS in view of
dependability gauges System many-
sided quality, especially in
programming frameworks, making
RIS estimation hard to
incomprehensible These prompt
such wrong articulations as, "This
framework is a RIS N framework in
light of the fact that the procedure
embraced amid its advancement
was the standard procedure for the
improvement of a RIS N framework"
, or utilization of the RIS idea
outside of any relevant connection to
the subject at hand, for example,
"This is a RIS 3 warm exchanger" or
"This product is RIS 2"
A big project involves overseeing a
lot of moving parts, oftentimes from
different people. To have a successful
rollout, project managers rely on a
well-crafted project plan to ensure
objectives are met on time and on
budget. A project plan is a formal
approved document which is used to
define project goals, outline the
project scope, monitor deliverables,
and mitigate risks. It must answer
basic questions like what is the
purpose of the project, what
activities are involved, who will be
responsible for what, and when is it
expected to be completed?
It is not to be confused with the
Gantt chart, which shows project
deliverables against the timeline. The
said chart is only one part of the
project plan.
"An approach that strays
from the conventional,
coupled with
consistency, enables us
to contribute to the
company's overall
growth and success."
MORE ABOUT RIS