The document summarizes four case studies related to shale oil and gas exploration applications: 1) An application in Lancashire to extend monitoring of a shale gas well was approved with ecological mitigation measures. 2) An application in West Sussex to drill an exploratory borehole was refused due to failure to demonstrate benefits outweighing impacts to the protected landscape. 3) Another application in West Sussex was refused due to unsuitable access and impacts to residential amenity and character from traffic. 4) An application in Wrexham initially refused for being unsustainable and outside settlement limits was allowed on appeal, with the inspector rejecting the local authority's concerns.

1. Shale Oil Exploration and Development
Case Studies
Rachel Hamblin

2. Presentation TitlePlanning Advisory Service: Shale Oil Exploration and Development
Case studies (1)
Banks Enclosed Marsh, Becconsall, Lancashire
•application to retain well site for a further 3 years to allow pressure monitoring of the
Bowland Shale reservoir, followed by plugging and abandonment of the well and site
restoration.
•planning permission granted in September 2014
•comment - applicant provided a unilateral undertaking in respect of offsite ecological
mitigation measures.
Nine Acre Copse, Fenhurst, West Sussex
•application to drill a vertical borehole for the exploration, testing and evaluation of
hydrocarbons for a temporary period of three years.
•planning permission refused in September 2014.
•comment – permission refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate exceptional
circumstances exist and that it would be in the public interest for such exploration to take
place within the protected landscape of the South Downs and due to the adverse impact on
the tranquillity and amenity of the National Park.

3. Presentation TitlePlanning Advisory Service: Shale Oil Exploration and Development
Case studies (2)
Boxal Bridge, Wisborough Green, West Sussex
•application to drill a vertical borehole and contingent horizontal borehole for the
exploration, testing and evaluation of hydrocarbons for a temporary period of three years.
•planning permission refused in July 2014 (appeal lodged)
•comment - permission refused because access considered to be unsuitable in terms of
highway capacity and road safety and on residential amenity through increased noise.
Traffic also held to harm the character of Wisborough Green and Conservation Area.
West of Commonwood Farm, Commonwood, Wrexham
•application to drill exploration borehole for core sampling of coal and site restoration.
•planning permission refused by the LPA and allowed on appeal
•comment - permission initially refused because proposal considered to be i) in an
unsustainable location and ii) industrial development outside recognised settlement limit.
LPA also held that the geophysical survey did not provide sufficient information in respect of
the impact of drilling upon the movement of gas. Appeal allowed in October 2014 - Council’s
concerns rejected by Inspector.

4. Presentation TitlePlanning Advisory Service: Shale Oil Exploration and Development
Case studies (3)
Findings
•Becconsall permission approved despite widespread concerns about shale gas extraction
in Lancashire;
•Fenhurst decision turned on the tests at para 116 of the NPPF. Any appeal will be
instrumental in establishing how the Secretary of State considers that these tests should be
applied in the case of shale gas extraction.
•Wisborough Green decision turned on “traditional” highways related issues.
•Wrexham initial decision appears to have been influenced by potential future development
– rather than that proposed in the application.
Overall – while the shale gas debate may have been an influencing factor in some of these
cases, the deciding factors cited are mainly based on “traditional” planning considerations.