Individual tests are administered one-on-one and allow for close examination of examinee behavior, while group tests can assess large numbers simultaneously but provide less accurate information. Some key differences are that individual tests are more time consuming and require a trained examiner, while group tests have simplified administration, more objective scoring, and establish norms from large samples. Both have advantages and disadvantages depending on the testing needs and environment.

1. TERM PAPER
SUBJECT: (PSY294) PSYCHOMETRICS
TOPIC: INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP TESTS
SUBMITTED BY
DEVIREDDY DINESH
(11502811)
SECTION : M32A84
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF
SAJAD HUSSIAN
(ASSISTANT PROFESSOR)
DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY
LOVELY PROFESSIONAL UNIVERSITY

2. INTRODUCTION
Individual Test and Group Test
The term intelligence refers the individual differences in mental ability.
Intelligence test can be administered individually or in group.
Distinction between individual and group tests:
Individual Tests: A test can be said individual test in the sense that they
can be administered to only one person at a time. Many of the tests in
these scales require oral responses from the examinee or necessitate the
manipulation of the materials.
Individual intelligence tests are preferred by psychologist in clinics,
hospitals and other settings where clinical diagnosis are made, and
where they serve not only as measures of general intelligence but also as
means of observing behavior in a standard situation.
Group Test:
Group test was developed to meet a pressing practical need. Group test
can be administered to a group of persons at a time.
Group tests were designed as mass testing instruments; they not only
permit the simultaneous examination of large groups but they also use
simplified instruction and administration procedures. There by requiring
a minimum of training on the part of examiner.

3. Individual Tests:
The first tests that were prepared were individual. The ideal of preparing
group test was motivated by economy and mass-scale testing work. Binet’s
test was individual, and so was Terman-Merril Stanford Revision. Individual
tests are most reliable but these consume more time and energy. These are,
however, useful in making case-studies or individual studies of behaviour
problems or backwardness.
The tests prepared in the beginning were individual verbal i.e., where some
sort of language (the mother-tongue of the child) was used. Each question in
Simon-Binet or Stanford Revision test is in verbal form. The child has to read
the question or listen to the question and answer in language.
But suppose the child is not fully conversant with the language of the
examiner, or he is illiterate. In that case verbal tests do not serve the purpose.
Hence non-verbal or performance tests have been prepared. Here the tasks set
up require the child to do ‘something’ rather than reply a question.
The child may, for instance, fit in a wooden board with depressions in some
geometrical forms, some wooden shapes like triangles or rectangles or
circles. He may put some cubes in descending or ascending order of size. He
may assemble certain disintegrated parts to form full designs or pictures. No
language is used here. Instructions also can be had through demonstration or
action.

4. A number of performance tests have been prepared. The most important
are:
1. Alexander’s Pass-a-long test.
2. Koh’s Block Design test.
3. Collin and Drever’s Performance Tests.
4. Weschlers Performance Test.
5. Terman and Merill’s Performance Test.
6. Kent’s Performance Test.
Kent’s test is used for clinical purposes. It consists of five oral tests and seven
written tests, each requiring one minute.
Individual performance tests have the disadvantage that these take a lot of
time. Their reliability is also questioned on the ground that temporary
response sets or work habits may play a major role in determining score. The
habits rewarded in one test may lead to a low score or more scores on
another.
Again, the intelligence measured by performance tests is not quite the same
as tested by Binet and others. Some psychologists have even questioned
whether performance test batteries measure general intelligence at all. Further
details about performance tests are given below elsewhere.

5. Group Tests:
These are more helpful as these deal with large masses of subjects such as in
schools, industry, army and public. Under favourable administering
conditions these are reliable and have high predictive validity, and can be
compared favourably with individual tests.
The Army Alpha and Beta were the most prominent tests in the beginning,
Spearman constructed group tests in which questions were read out to the
candidates. Cyril, Burt prepared group test comprising of large number of
sections each section being a large number of problems of one particular
kind.
His group-test no. 23 comprises 50 same-opposite problems, 30 sentence
completion problems, 30 mixed sentences, 25 analogies and 18 reasoning
problems.
A specimen of Burt’s graded reasoning test is given in Appendix VII.
In the ‘Omnibus’ test or ‘Richardson’s ‘Simplex Text’, the different sections
are not timed separately, but there is a time limit for the whole test.
Army Beta test is the most widely known group performance test.

6. In general, group tests have the following characteristics:
(i) Most of the group-tests have been standardised, and these are commonly
used in educational institutions in the western countries. The directions and
manuals for examiners have been worked out, so that even a lay-man can
administer these.
(ii) Most of the test items in group verbal tests are linguistic in character.
Some of the test items include problems requiring reasoning about numbers,
or geometrical forms.
(iii) Some group verbal tests have been used in measuring scholastic aptitude
also.
(iv) These are convenient in administration and scoring.

7. Comparison of Individual and Group Test:

8. Advantages and Disadvantages of individual tests:
Advantages: Examiner can pay more attention to the examinee.
Examiner can easily encourage the examinee and observe his behavior
during the test more closely.
Scores on individual tests are not as dependent on reading ability as
scores in group tests.
Disadvantages: It is very time consuming
This type of tests requires a highly-trained examiner.
It costs more than the group test.
Advantages and Disadvantages of group tests:
Advantages: can be administered to very large numbers simultaneously
simplified examiner role
scoring typically more objective
large, representative samples often used leading to better established
norms
A highly verbal group test can have a higher validity co-efficient than an
individual test.
Disadvantages: Scores on the group test are generally dependent on the
reading ability.
Information obtained by the group test generally less accurate than the
individual tests
examiner has less opportunity to establish rapport, obtain cooperation,
and maintain interest

9. CONCLUSION : This is the information about the individual test
and group test in psychometrics based upon the problem and its
solutions the test can be taken
THANKYOU